NYSA TI Single-Page 2
J RICHARD BURR S_n_ D_. No_rn_ CA_OtJ_, COMMERCE
Abstract
BURR: Hiking cigarette taxes will promote black market activity and fail to substantially reduce youth smoking.
Fields
- Named Organization
- General Accounting Office
- Government Accountability Office (GAO)
- White House
- Government Accountability Office (GAO)
- Named Person
- Burr, Richard
- Peterson, Alicia
- Date Loaded
- 18 Jul 2005
- Box
- 8188
Document Images
J RICHARD BURR
S~n~ D~. No~rn~ CA~OtJ~,
COMMERCE
HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT
ENERGY AND POWER
OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGA~ONS
angrt nittb
~la~l~ington, ~ 2051.5-3305
1513 Lo~m,~oecrH HOB
W, CSH~GTON. OC 2~15
FAX (202) ~5
(~2} ~20
E.MAIL: Richa rd.Bu ~N C05@mail.h ouse.go~
~ WEST Fm~
Su=~ 50B
PIEDMONT P~ TWO
W~S~QN-SALEM, NC 27
(336l ~1~125
F~X (336) 725~3
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 14, 1998
CONTACT: Alicia Peterson
(202) 225-2071
REPRESENTATIVE RICHARD BURR RELEASES GAO STUDY ON
THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TOBACCO LEGISLATION
BURR: Hiking cigarette taxes will promote black market activity and fail to substantially reduce
youth smoking.
WASHINGTON, DC--Today Represemative Richard Burr (NC-5) released a study by the
General Accounting Office (GAO) of the economic impact of tobacco legislation. On June 19,
1997 Rep. Burr requested that the GAO conduct the study. The report rifled, "Tobacco: Issues
Surrounding a National Tobacco Settlement," addresses questions surrounding youth smoking,
the black market sale of cigarettes, state excise taxes on cigarettes and tobacco-related
employment figures.
"The GAO study illustrates that by increasing the price of cigarettes, we put America in
danger of a flourishing black market for cigarettes, we miss the mark of reducing youth access to
cigarettes, and we force states into a precarious situation of raising billions of dollars in
probable
lost revenue from excise taxes," said Representative Burr.
"As we've seen in Canada, access to cheap contraband tobacco undermined the
government's health policy objectives of reducing tobacco consumption, particularly among
youth. You earmot control the distribution and sale of cigarettes to youth if those cigarettes are
obtained on the black market," Burr continued. The report concludes that any price disparity of
cigarettes between states or countries provides the economic incentives for individuals to profit
from smuggling, therefore encouraging black market activity. Studies show that sharp increases
in Canadian cigarette taxes increased black market organized crime between the U.S. and
Canada. The Canadian government estimated that in 1993, contraband cigarettes made up over
60% of the Quebec market alone.
"A thriving black market for cigarettes does not exist in a vacuum. According to the
Canadian government, international smuggling brought with it an increase in violence, suffering
for Canadian merchants and a loss of 2 billion Canadian dollars in tax revenue in one year alone.
We can't ignore the Canadian example as American legislators work toward responsible tobacco
legislation to reduce underage smoking," Burr stated. The extent ofU.S.-Mexican intemarional
cigarette smuggling is currently unknown, but according to government officials substantial
smuggling exists.
TI30722999

PAGE 2
"Additionally, regarding youth smoking, the GAO report illustrates that the debate in
Congress and the White House is on the wrong track. Is our goal to reduce youth smoking, or to
punish the tobacco industry? l_fmy colleagues in Congress share the American goal of keeping
cigarettes out of the hands of our children, then we need to make sure that any tobacco legislation
does not substitute extracting money from the tobacco industry for the true purpose of
controlling youth access," he continued.
The report shows that increasing the price of cigarettes by $0.62 per pack will reduce all
consumption from 9-16%, increasing each pack by $1.50 will reduce consumption from 19-33%,
and inereas_'mg each pack by $2.00 will reduce consumption from 24-40%. From these figures,
even the best ease scenario would not bring a reduction in teen smoking by the 60% mandated in
a current legislative proposal in Congress. Studies show that if th6 price of cigarettes increased
by 100%, youth consumption still would not fall by 60%. Decreasing underage cigarette use by
this amount is not attainable through the suggested tax. increases. The cost of the inevitable
• penalties levied on the industry for missing these marks would be transferred to smokers.
Further, according to the Tax Foundation, almost 60% of the cigarette excise tax burden falls on
people earning $30,000 or less annually.
"Finally, any decline in cigarette consumption will force states to make up potentially
billions in state excise tax revenue," Burr continued. Nationwide, the cigarette tax hike could
end up costing the states from about $673 million to $3 billion annually in lost income.
T!30723000
