NYSA TI Multipage 2
Missouri Assist Summary T!3052-0334
Abstract
The American Stop Smoking Invention Study for cancer prevention ("ASSIST") is a federally funded, collaborative effort between the National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society, along with state and local health departments and other voluntary o~anizations, to develop and implement comprehensive tobacco control programs in seventeen states, including Missouri.
Fields
- NYSA numbers
- 0398 B1793 02B
- Date Loaded
- 27 Jan 2005
- Box
- 9246. Public Affairs files - Project ASSIST States include: CO, IN, MA, ME, MI, MN, MO, NJ, NM, NY, NC, RI, SC, VA, WA, WV, WI December 1996
- Folder
- MISSOURI ASSIST SUMMARY
- Division
- Public Affairs
Document Images
MISSOURI
ASSIST SUMMARY
T!3052-0334

MISSOURI ASSIST SUMMARY -- LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
The American Stop Smoking Invention Study for cancer prevention
("ASSIST") is a federally funded, collaborative effort between the National Cancer
Institute and the American Cancer Society, along with state and local health departments
and other voluntary o~anizations, to develop and implement comprehensive tobacco
control programs in seventeen states, including Missouri. Missouri Project ASSIST
("MO ASSIST") apparently has engaged in a wide variety of direct and indirect anti-
tobacco lobbying activities at the local level, and planned to do the same at the state
level, according to documents obtained through Freedom-of-Information Act requests and
other public materials.
MO ASSIST's Stated Objective Is To Support Anti-Smoking
Public Policies
MO ASSIST's stated objective is to support policies which:
[R]estrict tobacco industry access to minors, limit exposure to
secondhand smoke, increase economic incentives to discourage
Wbacco use, establish Wbacco-free schools and restrict Wbacco
advertising targeted toward children.
Attachment 1 at 19 (emphasis added): see also Attachments 2, 8.
MO ASSIST equated "policy advocacy" with lobbying:
A leadership training was held.., to educate ASSIST coalition
and committee chairs about policy promotion and media advocacy
. . . [T]he Missouri Women's Network... discussed the
separation of education and lobbying.
Attachment 3 at 3 (emphasis added); see also Attachment 4.
To accomplish its goals, MO ASSIST worked with the Missouri Coalition
on Smoking and Health (the "Coalition"), an existing anti-smoking organization. Indeed,
the Coalition "interact[ed] with the Missouri ASSIST project to consider legislation that
fulfills ASSIST objectives. A number of people sit on both coalitions." Attachment 5
at 3 (emphasis added); see also Attachtnents 6, 7, 8, 11.

2
II. MO ASSIST Planned To Lobby State Legislators
Members of MO ASSIST apparently attended a conference in California
entitled "Increasing State Tobacco Excise Taxes Through Initiated Acts - A National
Training Conference," which was sponsored by the American Lung Association of
Sacramento. Attachment 9. MO ASSIST used federal funds for this activity.
Attachment 10.
IIl. MO ASSIST Lobbied Local Officials
MO ASSIST planned to support a youth advocacy training project which
would culminate in a youth rally. The project was designed to generate support for
youth access ordinances across Missouri. Attachment 11 at 143; see also Attachment 12.
MO ASSIST similarly intended to use $16,000 of ASSIST funds to
support a St. Louis policy advocacy project that would "[e]mpower youth in the
community to speak out in support of local tobacco control public policies."
Attachment 11 at 151. The project's objective was to "[p]ass local ordinances in the St.
Louis metropolitan area identifying enforcement agencies for restricting the sale of
tobacco to minors." Id. (emphasis added).
MO ASSIST'S local coalition in Kansas City was particularly active.
Attachments 15, 16. For example, coalition members apparently retained a consultant to
lobby anonymously:
[The consultant] spoke either directly or through staff to each
councilmember. I did not identify myself as a consultant for this
project, but as a Kansas Citian, concerned with youth tobacco
issues. In each instance my identify was not a factor.
Attachment 15 (attached summary notes) (emphasis added).
MO ASSIST Apparently Used ASSIST Funds For Questionable
Expenses
In 1993, MO ASSIST expended funds on t-shirts, mugs and plaques.
In 1995, MO ASSIST expended thousands of dollars on travel. Attachment 13.
MO ASSIST also: (i) retained consultants to provide training and other services, and
(2) rented expensive conference rooms and banquet facilities. Attachment 14.

Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
ATTACHMENTS
(excerpts only, unless otherwise noted)
Documems
MO ASSIST Action Plan
MO ASSIST Newsletter, Summer 1994
MO ASSIST Quarterly Report, 4th Quarter, Phase I
(July I, 1992- Sept. 30, 1992)
MO ASSIST Quarterly Report, 2nd Quarter, Phase I
(Jan. 1, 1992- Mar. 31, 1992)
MO ASSIST Project Management Plan (Sept. 1993)
MO ASSIST Site Analysis (Oct. 1992)
MO ASSIST Quarterly Report, 2nd Quarter, Phase
I, Year 2 (Jan. 1, 1993 - Mar. 31, 1993) (complete)
MO ASSIST Quarterly Report, 3rd Quarter, Phase I,
Year 2 (Apr. 1, 1993 - June 30, 1993) (complete)
Notice of Gram Awarded to the American Lung
Association of Sacramento (Sept. 30, 1992)
Missouri Department of Health Monthly Expense
Reports for 1993, with two letters dated Jan. 13,
1995 and Aug. 31, 1995
MO ASSIST Annual Action Plan (Aug. 1994)
"Tobacco Road," St. Louis Post Dispatch (Apr. 6,
1996) (complete)
1995 MO ASSIST payments, invoices
Invoices from consultants; assorted bills for
conference rooms
Minutes of Kansas City Worksite Committee
Meetings
Minutes of Kansas City Media Committee Meetings

---

A TOBACCO CONTROL PLAN [] AMERICAN STOP SMOKING INTERVENTION STUDY
TOWARD A
Tobacco Free
MISSOURI
A Partnership Bem, een
Missouri Department of Health and the
American Cancer Society, Missouri Division, Inc.
Produced by
Missouri Department of Health
Bureau of Smoking, Tobacco and Cancer

HOW WI~ CIET THIEKE: THE ASSIST ACTIOH FLAH
A. Community Environment
Policy initiatives and media advocacy are effective means to control tobacco use for the popula-
tion as a whole, including youth, women of childbearing age. and those with a high school education
or less. Increases in tobacCo price~ through taxation are most effective in keeping youth from smok-
ing. Strong clean indoor air policies enforced in public places, including the work place, are most
successful In establishing nonsmoking norms and encouraging cessation by women of c.~ildbearing
age and Lhos˘ with a high school education or le~s.
BACKGROUND
MASS MEDIA. The media play a
critical role in influencing what society
knows, believes and does with respect
to tobacco use. Over the past 2,5
years, media coverage of the tobacco
and health Lssue has helped improve
public awareness of smoldng hazazcls,
sh~ed attitudes about smoking and
lowered the percentage of smokers in
the population. However, the public's under-
standing of tobacco's hazards is still n:markably
limited, particularly among those segments of
the population at greatest ~sk of StudYing --
children, women of childbearing age and those
with a high school education or less. An aggres-
sive media approach can inform the public
about tobacco use, provide information about
smoking cessation ciasses and educate the pub-
lic about policies that regulate tobacco.
Photo:
Kids dding, bike in the shadow of IoominE
ciEaret~e billboard.
The teFm media, a~ used here, Includes news-
papers, magazines, radio, television, billboazds,
newsletters and posters. Missouri has 53 daily
and 230 weekly newspapers, 9-28 radio stations
and 29 commercial and public television sta-
tions. Most of the media is concentrated in Kan-
sas City and St. Louis.
Media offer many opportunities for messages
beyond public service announcements. The me-
dia can focus public debate on tobacco issues

OI MEC-- IVES: Community Environment
Nonsmoking cues and messages in Missouri communities will have increased, and pro-
smoking cues and messages in Missouri communities will have decreased.
There will be substantially increased support for creation and enforcement of public policies
in Missouri tl~at restrict tobacco indust~, access to minors, limit exposure to secondhand
smoke, increase economic incentives to discourage tobacco use, establish tobacco-free
schools and restrict tooa˘co advertising targeted toward Children.
and inform the public about con-
t.roversies surrounding tobacco and
the tobacco companies" unethical
practices. Counter-adverLising and
promotion of special events and
existing smoking cessation pro-
grams are effective ways to carry
tobacco issues to the public.
cific media activities COuld include:
v" Hentions in news programs
and entertainment program-
rhine;
v" Billboard advertising;
v" ",~lagazine" and interview shows (including
radio call-ins):
v" Editorials in television, radio, newspapers
and magazines:
v" HP_,alth and political columns in newspapers
and magazines; and
v" Feature and in-depth news stories in spe-
cialized community newspapers, profes-
sional journals and association newsletters.
t-lass media also can provide an effective way
to influence social norms about tobacco use
Photo:
~V reporter
interviewing
nonsmoking advocate
among high-risk popu-
lations. T1~˘ media can
reach women of
childbearing age with
forceful messages con-
ceming the exposure
of chiidre.n to environ-
mental tobacco
smoke, smoking dur-
ing pregnancy and
ceptive marketing of
tobacco products to
young women.
Nedia exposure of
retailers who sell to youth can increase public
pressure for compliance with the restrictions on
sale to youth. Highlighting tobacco as a drug
during annual events may reach many youth and
parents with a message about the addictive na-
ture of tobacco. Aflgress[ve news stodes, televi-
sion and radio commercials, newspaper featur~
articles and local media (e.g., billboards) can
reach those with a high school education or less.
Radio talk shows, bus placards and small, local-
ized posters offer special access to inner-city
audiences.

The Missouri Legislature
and Iocat p=oveming
councils arc primarily
responsible for the
creation of tobacco-
related pubilc policies.
Photo:
Young. person in balcony of Mo House of
Reps watching legislators
I~JI~LIC FOLICY. Tlqe PIkssouri Le~slature
convenes ~nu~ly from J~u~ un~l ~d-Hay.
~ H~ou~ Senat~ ~ of 54 m~mb~
elected to four-y~ t~. ~e M~ufi House
of E~pr~cn~v~ b ~c up of 163 m~mbe~
who s~wc twmy~ tc~.
~c s~tc ~ dirtied in~ i l# coun~, plus
~ cI~ of SL ~uis. ~g In ~pula~on from
l~ ~ 3.000 to morc ~ on~ ~llion.
p~[~ ~clud~ county ~[o~. ~ coun-
cils. ~yom and O~
~C clotted offici~ ~d public ~enci~
cr~tc and enforce public ~cy ~i~a~ves
cm~ co~c~ ~ p~y
cr~on of ~ba~tC~ public ~li~. Hem-
bexs of ~ss-roots or~nlzatlons, private Individu-
als and professional lobbyists oi~en play a signifi-
cant rote in the creation of laws by supplying in-
formation and feedback to the ejected officials.
The judicial branch, statewifle public agencies
and local enforcement agencies am responsible
for enforcement of polic2es,
Missouri has a moderate statewide law (the
1992 Clean Indoor Air Act) that limits smoking in
public places. A second law enacted in that same
year re, stricts tobacco sales to minors. Missouri
has the sixth lowest tobacco tax in the country
and no state tax on spit tobacco, cigars or pipe
tobacco. Missouri has almost no reslnJcldons on
the placement of tobacco advertisLng.

Because policy initia~ives a[fect the entire Missouri population, they are an effective way to
estab-
l~sh and maintain community norms that affect high-risk populations, i~lajor pro~Iress can be made
Ln
the areas of clean indoor air, tobacco industry access to youth, tobacco-free schools, tobacco
pricing
and tobacco advertising:
Clean Indoor Air. In August 1992. the His-
souH Clean Jndoor Air Act became law. Tl~is rep-
resented a victory for the more than 70 percent
of Htssour~arm who do not smoke. The purpose
of the law is to limit public smoldng to desig-
nated areas. The law mandates that public
places -- including stores, workplaces and meet-
ings of governmental bodies -- may designate
no more than 30 percent of the total area
smokdng, l~ublic places also may be declared
I O0 percent smoke-free. Any person or business
violating the Clean indoor Air act can be fined.
Local law enforcement agencies are responsible
for responding to citizen complaints and for fil-
ing reports for legal act, ion. Local municipalities
may choose to pass more sU~_ngent clean indoor
Tobacco Industry Access to Youth. Ninety
percent of smokers are addicted before a~e 2 I.
In order to control the availability of tobacco to
youth. Hissouri needs to streng~then and enforce
the existing laws and adopt measures to license
retailers for the sale of tobacco. Banning the sale
of tobacco from vending machines, the free dis-
L,-ibu~ion of tobacco products and the sale of
single cigarettes are possible future policy initia-
tives to reduce tobacco use by minors.
air laws.
