NYSA TI Multipage 2
OUR EXPERIENCE WITH THE EARLY DETECTION OF SMALL RESPIRATORY DISEASES (Ni_, Yougosla_,ia
Abstract
In order to establish which method o] examining ~ulmonk: b appropriate for early dia~nosls o/small r, splratory airway di~ease~, w, ~de ex~i~tio~ o~ several ~ou~ by ~ing di]jeren~ ap~r~t~¢s and di[fsr~nt I~sts. " The first group c~ted o[ 1517 young men. We exami~d them by MMFR and FEV~ and estab~d th~ MMFR 25-751FVC had d~covered double number with ~ssened ~aes then In the [oarth ~roup a hundred men. aged 50.
Fields
- NYSA numbers
- 1200 B1793 03A
- Named Organization
- Gastroenterology (scientific periodical)
- University of Texas
- Date Loaded
- 27 Jan 2005
- Box
- 0027. Library/Miscellaneous - 11-21 18205-18817
- Folder
- (no folder name)
- Division
- Library
Document Images
19"/6,
OUR EXPERIENCE WITH THE EARLY DETECTION
OF SMALL RESPIRATORY DISEASES
(Ni~, Yougosla~,ia)
In order to establish which method o] examining ~ulmonk: b appropriate for
early dia~nosls o/small r, splratory airway di~ease~, w, ~de ex~i~tio~ o~ several
~ou~ by ~ing di]jeren~ ap~r~t~¢s and di[fsr~nt I~sts. "
The first group c~ted o[ 1517 young men. We exami~d them by MMFR
and FEV~ and estab~d th~ MMFR 25-751FVC had d~covered double number
with ~ssened ~aes then
In the [oarth ~roup a hundred men. aged 50. were e~amined by plethysmo-
graphy and me~uremen~ o~ closing volume and me establbhed the results o~ MEF
25 and ~ 50 ~ the besl. ~ well ~ IGV wh~e ~ and Rs did not show
~uffic~at s~ceptibility /or small respiratory ai~ay di~e~es. ~ /or e/o~a~ volu~
it showed incre~ing for all. especially
In 1956, Duhois intr~!uced the direct measurement of the resistance
respiratory airway by using phthysmography. For some time it was
thought that the best way of early detection of respiratory disease was
measurement of resistance in it. Soon it was discovered thaf a disease
of respiratory airway can be very significant although the finds of splro~
merry are normal.-This statement mostly refers .to'small respiratory
diseases.
In the year 1950 and 1958, McLean explained pathogenesis of em-
physema and attached great importance to pathological changes in ter-
minal respiratory bronchiole~. Obliteration and obmration of small respi-
ratory airway is a matter under great discussion. It is known that
resistance in small respiratory airway is ten or more times weaker than
the one in big respiratory airway and being like that, i~ is of little
influence in total pulmonary resistance. Because of that fact we cannot
discover ~the disease of small respiratory airway by measurement of its
resistance. On the occasion of routine spirometric examination of small
respiratory airway diseases, classical test of a spirometry are almost always
of a normal value.
During small respiratory airway, diseases~ besides changes in bron-
chioles, peribronchiai changes appear as Well and lessening of pulmonary
T!04231211

522 Basni~ Mil,,nka et coll.
recoil comes as a mmfifestation of that. So. the measurement of com-
pliance, residual volume, FRG and other speeial test were nlade in order
to discover small respiratory disease as soon as possible.'
The test which shows how quickly lungs are empty during" ma_ximal
expiration in the unit of time with re]atiou to volume is the best one.
FEVI, dynamic forced expiratory vtllume per second, is kllowB as a good
one. At forced expiration (FEF) speed V max. of 100 % to 75'% of VC
depends on expiratory musculature previously. V max. 75'°]~ to 25 o-~ of
VC depends higher degree on resistance ill respiratory airway. The
longer expiration, closer to the end of VC (25 %) the greater dependance
of flow on the state of structures and patbophyslologlcal factors of small
respiratory airway.
FEV~ is significant for big respirator)' airways but is not enough
noticeable for small one, because closing of small respiratory airway, at
small volumes, appears at the end of the first second.
In order to mesure small respiratory volumes and closing volumes
as well a lot of more or less promising test have been used in recent
years. Its value is different~ so we tried to examine them on own material
and compare their values.
MF-,THOD AND MATERIAL
We used the best known tests for early diagnosis of small respiratory
airway diseases. We compared the results of the tests for four different
groups of examined persons.
In the first group we compared the results of examination of the
young men who live in mountainous areas with tile youth who live in
the city: all of them were the same age. We compared two groups of
persons, smokers and non smokers, age 30 and 50, as well. We used
mostly maximal midexpiratory flow rate 25-75 % of FVC test, discovered
by Fowler and Leuallen in 1955, then a curve expiring volume and its
MEF 25 and 50% of F\rC.
The group of workers in metal industry, aged 50, was examined
plethysrno~aphieally with the use of closing volume.
We used apparatuses of the type - Vitalograph, Jones Co., Pneumo-
datascreen and Plethysmograph (Jaeger Co.). Closing volume was done
by the helium bolus method with the apparatus of Godart Co.
Spirometric finds of 1517 young men, who live in mountainous area,
aged 18-19, were shown on the table I. We used Vitalograph. MMFR
was counted from the curve of FVC. It is seen on the table that values
of FEW were lessened under 80 % for 10% examined persons, 19 %
persons have lessened values of parameter under 3,51/s. It can be sedn
by comparing these two tests that MMFR was lessened with l0 % persons
who have normal find of FEV~. It can be deduced by this comparison
that the medium segment shows doubled number with suspicion to the
beginni~
cion of
slavian
in tim
group li
datascre.
Thi
smokers
values o
persons .
50% w~
with M1-
with
The
degree o
(who sm,
FEW is
of values.
• is closer
Whe
is seen
was lesse.
seen by
of the te,
. all paran,
The
same bral;
get Co. az
method.
Whe~.
smokers
value$ are
smokers al
percentage
non smoke
The r,
the same,
considerab]
than with
~S for
Tile
as well as
T104231212

of corn-
in order
~est one.
s a good
~- of VG
25 % of
ay. The
~ndance
of small
t enough
.[rway, at
volunles
in recent
material
-espiratory
• different
on of the
ho live in
groups of
We used
discovered
ne and its
examined
., Pneumo-
was done
~o.
inous area,
h. MMFR
that values
~ons, 19 %
an be seen
.% persons
comparison
:ion to the
Early detection of small respiratory diseases
523
beginning of obstructive disease. Our results (19 % young men under suspi-
cion of having early stadium of disease) is on accord with other Yougo-
slavian authors.
]n the second .group we examined young men of the santo age as
in the first group but in co.ntrast to them, the young men of the second
group live in a polluted air city. The apparatus Vitalograph and Pneumo-
datascreen were used. The results of both do not diverge essentially.
The table II shows that 66 young men were examined, 51 non
smokers and 15 smokers with 10-90 cigarettes daily. If we compare the
values of the tests it can be seen that FEW was lessened with 10 %
person~, and MEF 25 % with 35~ ones. It is obviously seen that MEF
50 % was also lessened with 35 % examined persons and the same was
with MEF 25 %. Tlae values with smokers were lessened for 10'% than
with non smokers.
"/'he third group consists of 150 clerks who live in a city a high
degree of air pollution. There were 79 non smokers and 71 smokers
(who smoke 20 cigarettes daily). They were about SI years old (tab. IIl),
FEX,a is ahnost of the same value with both groups. From distribution
of values, which is not shown here it can be seen that FEVt of smokers
is closer to the lower linfit than it is for non smokers.
When MEF-FE, F 25 of smokers and nora smokers are compared, it
is seen that the values are smaller for 24% for smokers, and MEF 50
was lessened for 21'%. MEF was lessened for 16 % smokers. It was
seen hy distribution of values under 80 % FEW and MEF that values
of the tests were lessened more for smokers than for non smokers for
all parameters.
The 4th group consist of metal workers, age 50, 57 smokers~ 35 non
smokers and 8 of them gave up smoking ten years age. All work in the
same branch of industry. Examination were made by plethysanograph Jae-
ger Co. and closing volume by apparatus of Godart Co. with helium bolus
method.
When the diseases of small respiratory airway with smokers and non
smokers were compared, it was seen on the table that the significant
values are just for IGV with P ~ 0.005. When other parameters between
smokers and non smokers were compared it was shown that, concerning
percentage, all values with smokers were in same degree smaller than with
non smokers.
The results of VG and F.EVx for smokers and non smokers are almost
the same, but the values of parameters MEF 50 and MEF 25 were lessened
considerably. MEF 25 and MEF 50 with smokers was lessened for 10 %
than with non smokers and MF~F 50 with smokers was smaller for 90 %,
as for ex-smokers, it was lessened minimally (tab. IV).
"]'he resistance was greater with smokers for than with non smokers
as well as IGV, which is greatly significant with smokers.
Ti04231213

524
Bosn[d Mi[anka ct coll.
Data ]rom comparLton between FEV~ and M.
~o zheor
]00 + 20
80 -- 60
6O -- 45
FEVz
(tot~! =
1517)
1363
121
33
89.8
8
2.2
< z.4
2
0.15
1.7
1
29
lo
MMFR (Max3mul Midexpiratory Flowrate = Fowler).
O.Itz
24
30.3
,,
No smoker 51
TAnLZ lI. -- Data [rom compar,oo
15
Pred. val.
Pred. val.
Meas. va|.
MMFR (25-
<2.5 l/s %
20 1.45
46 38
14 42.5
lung [unction tests (.
"VC FEVt -- . MEF.,.__~
Smoker
Ill. -- Data from compt
VC FEV]
N. ~,
71
Pred, val.
Mess. val.
Pred. val.
Meas.
4.74
4.80
4.a3
4.79
% SD
102 80
99
%
3.8Z ~
4.30 113
3.9
4.06 104
lung function tezts (/
8.87
8.71
7.40
T104231214

° I
A
A
V
V

526
I I
I i
Val
regard t.
the diffi
of smok,
show th
for sma
Discuss
In
in direcl
proporti,
EPI
intrabrol
RFe Oppo
but
I~ l
are small
moves ir~
condition,
close earl
to close
close mot
units is
Closing
and it
In tl
examinin..
seen that
or they
Orl an av
early dia,_
wkhdraw
The
FEV~. O.
examined
the value-
We
it is evide
in the fir,
With
age and •
question
susceptibh
T1042312I 6

Early detection of small respiratory diseases
527
Values of closing volume are not statistically significant and with
regard to 1~ercentage of medium values between smokers and non smokers,
the difference is in the benefit of ~nokers in small degree. C11osing volume
of ~mokers is 25,4-9 ~o of VC with standard deviation of 6.q4.. These results
show that whole closing volume was increased which obviously speaks
for small respiratory, airway disease.
]~'ISC'USSION
In 1967, Mead established that MEF for any pulmonary volume is
in directly proportion with elastic pulmonary pressure and in inverted
proportion with the nfidbetween pressure of alveolas.
EPP (Equal Pressure Point) is a place where, during expiring, positive
intrabronchial pressure and intrapleural pressure equalize and their forces
are opposite. During'quiet breathing EPP is in a big respiratory airways
but during forced expiration it moves towards small respiratory airway.
In 1969 Macklem affirms that EPP of a healthy r/~an moves if volumes
are smaller than 25'% of VC. But with obstruction of RT and RSm EPP
moves into Rt already with larger pulmonary volumes. These are basic
conditions which increase resistance in small respiratory, airways so they
close earlier and that is why we get greater IGV and GV. Airways begin
to close with 46 % of total pulmonary capacity -- Sutherland asserts. They
close more and more with fall of pulmonary volume. A half of pulmonar5,
units is closed for RV. Early closing has been measured by closing volume.
Closing volume shows greater closing during fall of pulmonic elasticity,
and it can be seen in diseases of small respiratory airways.
In the comment of our table, when we compared their values got by
examining different groups with different apparatuses, it is obviously
seen that the values of routine parameter are on the limits of normality
or they were partially narrowed with smokers, 10 % of theoretical values
on an average at the most. But this comparison shows that the tests for
early diagnosis of small respiratory airway diseases have considerably great
withdraw all from nonaaal values (predicted).
The table I shows that MMFR was lessened almost doubly than
FEV~. On the table II FEF 25 and FEF 50 were lessened for 35%
examined persons, while FEVa was lessened just for 10 %. In this way,
the values of both tests can be seen.
We compare both parameters by comparing those two groups, so,
it is evident that FEF 25 and FEF 50 are considerably lower than MMFR
in the first group.
With regard to the fact that these are the young men of thg same
age and the difference is pritty considerable, the most probable is the
question of susceptibility of the test. It is hard to say if MMFR is less
susceptible than FEF 25 and FEF 50 or it is the matter of greater part
T!04231217

.528 BosniE Milanka ct coll.
of persons from city area that I~ave the heginning disease than the ones
from mountainous area. If we consider the values of the tests in the
table III and distrihutive values, we see that FEVt is of equal values
with smokers and non smokers, hut the values with smoker.~ are somewhat
smaller.
The values with smokers are lower for 20 % that with non smokers.
that can be seen by comparing ]:EF 25 and FEF
The 4th group was the oldest of all groups, hut as they work
metal industry about 30 years, it was normal to expect worse results.
There is no great significance between smokers and non smokers, hut
average values show that smokers have worse test values. IGV and Rt
are the only ones significant statistically, while closing volume is not, but
anyway, it is increased three times with all examined persons, slightly
more with smokers. It is seen in thi~ group that the routine tests are closer
to normal values while other tests (FEF 25,' FEF 50. IGV, Rt, Rs and
CV) as more susceptible parameters for detection of changes in small
respiratory airway, more susceptible and they incline to pathological values
in higher degree.
This examination justified, more or less, other authors assertion about
possibility of early diagnosis of small respiratory airway diseases, and
especially this examination told the difference hetween smokers and non
smokers and all others which are open to pathologic agents. Both young
or old men can be obstructive persons.
The conclusion of our work is that the shown parametres confirmed
justification to be used for early diagnosis of disease and that they are
mostly the same. Some of them fit mass use, others are just for clinical
work,
Hospital [or Lung Disease: Knez Selo,
18.000 Ni~, Yougoslarla
(Prim.: Bos.~d dr.
A:
One h.
66 carpet ~,
[actory wet
.411 we
disease due
gu?n~lTary l't
to deterrah,
workers ana
The r,
parameters
Finally
I NTROD UCT:
All int
appearing
other dust:
A rex"
Diseases of
Extrinsic I"
dusts was
(2~ %).
In the
of respirato
inhalation ,
the same p.
and the res
(*) Parth
T!04231218

mucosa! m[crosomes from treated rats in a dose-dependenl
fashion. Maximal stimulation of benzo(a}pyrene hydroxylation
activity (160% above control) was achieved with doses be-
tween 250 and 375 ,ug of penlagastrin per kg body weight,
which was in good agreement with the amount of pentagastrin
reported to stimulate maximal DNA synthesis in the colonic
mucosa (18).
As shown in Table 1, the hydroxylation of benzo(a)pyrene
and a variety of drugs is stimulated by pentagastrin pretreat-
merit but to different degrees, The rate of hydroxylation of
some drugs, especially ethylmorphine, is stimulated after only
a single treatment with pentagastrin. Highest activities were
observed after 3 days of treatment. The hydroxylation rates of
ethylmorphlne and benzo(a)pyrene were most responsive to
pentagastrin pretreatment, Colonic cytochrome P-450 content
was almost doubled and cytochrome P-450 reductaae activity
was increased by pentagastrin pretreatment.
Having shown the dosage and time dependence of the pen-
tagastrin induction of mucosal drug metabolism system activi-
ties, it was important to determine whether pentagastrin induc-
tion involves the synthesis of new enzyme protein as has
already been shown for phenobarbital induction of the liver
drug metabolism system (7) and for the emergence of drug
metabolism activities in neonatal hepatocytes (4}. The inhibitor
of protein synthesis, cycloheximide, was used to examine this
possibility. As shown in Table 2, cycloheximide injected 45 min
before pentagastrin for 3 days completely prevented the induc-
tion of drug metabolism in the colon by pentagastrin as judged
by the elimination of pentagastrin-dependent increases over
the untreated controls in cytochrome P-450 content, cyto-
chrome c reductase activity, or the rate of hydroxylation of any
of a variety of substrates. These data suggest a role for protein
synthesis in induction of the colonic drug metabolism system
by pentagastrin.
Induction of Hydroxylatlon Activities by Cholecystokinin
and Secretin, The data in the experiments described above
show that pentagastrin, a pentapeptide hormone containing
the minimum amino acid sequence required for the physiolog-
ical activities of gastrin (1 1), markedly increases drug metab-
olism activities in the colon through a process involving protein
synthesis. Of the other major gastrointestinal hormones, cho-
lecystokinin has an almost identical COOHoterminal sequence
to that of gastrin. The terminal pentapeptide is the same in the
2 hormones. Secretin, on the other hand, has more sequence
Table 1
Induction of colon microsomal drug metabolism system activities by
pentagastrin
Rals received injections of pentagastrm, (250 Fg/kg/day) for I, 2, or 3 days
and were sacrificed 16 hr after the last injection. Microsomes were 10repared
from the colonic mucosa and assayed for the catalytic activity usir~g various
substrates. The data are reported as I~ercenlage of increase in activity above the
control treated only with 0.9% NaCI solution. Control levels are given in Table 2.
% of increase over control
Hydroxylation activities Day I Day 2 Day 3
eenzphetamine 0 13 17
Ethylmorphine 28 134 278
~-Nitroanisole 6 36 65
p-Nitrophenetole 0 13 22
Benzo(a)pyrene 0 8 e3
System components
Cytochrome c reductase 5 22 29
Cytochrome P-450 content 0 0 77
Benzo(a)pyrene Hydroxylation and Gastrointestinal Hormones
Table 2
Effect of cycloheximlde on inducb'on of colon mtcrasomal drug metaDol~sm
activities by pentagastnn
Animals received either a single i.p. injechon of Denlagastrin (250 g/kg) for 3
days or 2 Lp. injections of cyclohex=mide {1 mg/kg) plus one injechon of
pentagastrin for 3 days. Control rats received vehmle only. The animals were
sacrificed, and the colon microsomes were assayed as described.
Cyclo-
hexlm-
Cyclo- ~de +
hex~m- Penta- penta-
Aclivities Conlrol Ide gastrm gastrln
Benzphetamine=' 0.48 0.47 0.56 0.27
Ethylmorpilinea 0.35 0.52 1.32 0.26
p-Nitroanisoleb 1.42 2.34 0.72
p-Nitrophenetoleb 1.04 0.0£] 1.27 0.62
Benzo(a)pyrenec 3°50 0.03 6.40 2.20
System components
Cytochrome c reductase°' 26.7 t B.6 34.4 21.7
CyIochrome P-450° 13 23 6
a nmol formaldehyde liberated per mit~ per rag.
b nmol p-nilrophenol liberated per rain per rag.
c pmot 3-bydroxybenzo(a)pyrene produced per rain per rag.
d nmoI cytochrome c reduced per rain per rag.
e pmol cytochrome P.-450 per rag.
homology with pancreatic glucagon than with gastrin. Thus, it
was important to compare the actions of these gastrointestinal
hormones with those of pentagastrin. As shown in Table 3,
both secretin and cholecystokinin octapeptide have marked
effects on the drug metabolism activities of the colon. Cyto-
chrome P-450-specific content was increased 2.5-fold by se-
cretin and 1.5-fold by cholecystokinin. With the exception of
its effects on the rates of O-dealkylation, cholecystokinin af-
fects the colon drug metabolism activities in the same direction
as does pentagastrin. Cholecystokinin stimulates benzpheta-
mine hydroxylation a little more and elhylmorphine hydroxyl-
ation a little less than does pentagastrin. The main point of
difference, however, between these highly similar polypeptides
is the marked lowering of O-dealkylation activity after treatment
with cholecystokinin, whereas pentagastrin pretreatment elicits
a modest increase in O-dealkylation of p-nitroanisole and p-
nitrophenetole. Secretin, which is known to inhibit the physio-
logical effects of gastrin (31), stimulates the colon microsomal
hydroxylation of most substrates, with the exception of benz-
phetamine and ethylmorphine. Moreover, the stlmulatory effect
of secretin on O-dealkylation is greater than that of pentagas-
trim
The effect of the gastrointestinal hormones on hepatic drug
metabolism system activities is shown in Table 4. In general,
some of the effects of these hormones on the liver system
parallel their effects on the colon system, while others do not.
O-Dealkylation activity in the liver is not significantly affected
by any gastrointestinal hormone. Pentagastrin does not signif-
icantly alter ethylmorphine metabolism in liver, and cholecys-
tokinin does not alter benzphetamine metabolism. Quantita-
tively, however, the liver responds to these hormones less well
in terms of the percentage of increase than does the colon.
Nonetheless, the control liver activities are higher than the
induced colon activities.
Effects of Tissue Substances on Colon and Liver Micro-
somal Drug Metabolism System Activities. Pentagastrin, se-
cretin, and cholecystokinin show some pronounced specificity
in the hydroxylation activities that they preferentially induce
inter se. They also seem to affect liver and colon systems
APRIL 1981
1409
T!04231221

W. F. Fang and H. We Strobel
differentially. In order to examine further this possible specific-
ity, we tested several tissue substances for their effects on
drug metabolism activity. (Tissue substances, like hormones,
have a broad range of effects but are produced by several
tissues.) We chose 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) and its
precursor 5-hydroxytryptophan, 1 6,16-dimethylprostaglandin
E2 (a stable prostaglandin derivative), and reserpine (a plant
alkaloid) for this study and determined the appropriate dos-
ages. The effects of these tissue substances on colon drug
metabolism activity are shown in Table 5, and the effects on
liver drug metabolism activity are shown in Table 6. None of
the tissue substances induces O-dealkylation in either the liver
or colon systems. In fact, the lowering of activity in pretreated
animals is statistically significant in most cases. Reserpine
pretreatment significantly stimulates colonic ethylmorphine de-
methylation. 16,16-Dimethylprostaglandin E2, on the other
hand, markedly stimulates colonic benzphetamine hydroxyl-
ation (2.5-fold) but inhibits liver benzphetamine hydroxylation.
Table 3
Induction of colon drug metabolism activities by gastrointestinal hormones
Animals received injections el a single dose of secretin (27 Fg/kg), cholecysloklnin octapeptide
(20 ~.g/
kg), or pentagastrin (250 ~g/kg) for 3 days as described in Table 1. Microsemal preparations el the
liver
and colon were assayed tot various drug metabolism activities.
Hydroxylation activities Control Pentagastrin
Secretin Cholecystoklnln
Benzphetaminea 0,48 -~- 0.02b 0.56 + 0.03
0.19 "+- 0.04¢ 0.74 + 0.04c
Ethylmorphinea. 0,35 .'*- 0.03 1.32 ± 0.15c 0.32 ± 0.02 0.45 ± 0.05
p-Nitroanisole° 1.42 ± 0.10 2.34 __. 0.42 t.94 + 0.28 0.39 ± 0.03c
p-Nitrophenetoled 1.04 + 0.17 1.27 --. 0.16 2.26 +_ 0.03c 0.54 ±
0.05c
Benzo(a)pyrenet 3.5 ± 0.7 6.4 "*- 0.50c 6.0 ± 0.4c 7.0 ± 0.4e
System components
Cylochrome P-450 contentg 13 ± 2.0 23.0 ± 2c 31.0
± 3c 21
Cytochrome c reductase/~ 26.8 _ 2.8 34.4 ± 2.2 33.8,
± 1.9 28.6
'= nmol formaldehyde liberaled per rain per mg.
b Average ± S.D. of at least 3 separate determinations of duplicale assay mixture.
c Significantly changed from control group by unpaired t tee1 for at least 3 separate
determinations at p
< 0.05.
~ nmol p-nitrcphenol liberated per rain per rag,
e pmol 3-hydroxybenzo(a)pyrene produced I~er mln !Per rag.
pmol/mg o! colon m~crosomal protein; nmol/mg of hver mmrosemal protein.
o nmol cytochrome c reduced per rain per rag.
Table 4
Induction of liver drug metabolism activities by gastrointestinal hormones
Experimental details are described in Table 3. All activities are expressed in units described
in Table 3 except for the
cytochrome P--450 content which is reported as nmol/m9.
Hydroxylation activities Control Pentagastrin
Secretin Cholecystokinin
Benzphetamine 5.28 ± 0,25e 6.49 ± O,4ta
5.06 ¢ 0.11~ 5.51 ± 0,42a
Ethylmorphine 8.34 ± 0.56 8.61 ± 0.77 9.66 ± 0.84c 7.36
"* 0.82
p-.Nitroanisole 3.50 _ 0.66 2,05 ± 0.16 2.96 ± 0.13
1,89 ~ 0.23d
p-Nitrophenetole 3.36 + 0.21 3.87 ± 0.46 3.37 ± 0.27
4.0 _ 0.82
eenzo(a)pyrene 130.0 ± 10.0 320.0 ± 40.0c
248.02 ± 21.83d 370.0 ± 30.0c
System componenls
Cytochrome P.-450 content 0.76 ± 0.05 0.91 ".*- 0.04
0.97 ± 0.03 0.83 ± 0.06
Cytochrome c reductase t53.4 ± 22.9 276.6 ± 24.6d
154.6 ± 5.3 236.3 __. 21
Average :1: S.D. as in Table 3.
Averages of 2 delerminations of 5 animals each --. variation from the average.
~Significant at p < O.01.
Signlflcanlly changed Irom control group by unpaired t test for at least 3 separate
determinations at p < 0.05.
Table 5
Effects o! tissue substances on colon drug metabolism system
Animals were i~retreated with 16.16-dimethylprostaglandin Ez, serotonin, 5-hydroxyoL-tryptophan,
or reserpine, and the colon microsomes
were assayed for drug metabolism activities. Experimental details are described in Table 1. All
activities are expressed in unite described for
the colon system in Table 3.
Dimethyl-prosta-
5-Hydroxy-L-tryp-
Hydroxylation activities Control glandin E= Serotonin
tophan Reserpine
eenzphetamlne 0.48 +_. 0.02~= 1.18 ± 0.16b
0.39 ± 0.03 0.57 ± 0.02b 0.51 ± 0.03
Ethylmorphine 0.35 ± 0.03 0.37 ± 0.06 0.44 "+- 0.07b 0.62 ±
0.07° 0.65 ± 0.06~'
/>-Nitroanisole 1.42 ± 0.10 0.24:1:: 0.05c 0.27 ± 0.17c 0.286
~. 0.02c 0.26 ± 0.03c
p--Nttrophenetole 1.04 ± 0.17 0.66 ± 0.06
0.08 ± 0.01c 0.28 0.03b 0.54 .+- 0.08b
Benzo(e)pyrene 3.50 :l: 0.70 5.0 ± 0.80
4.40 ± 0.80 5.0 -=- 0.40 7.3 ± 0.50b
System components
Cytochrome P-,450 content 13 d: 2 17" +--. 2
11 ± 1 10 ± 1 15 ± 2
Cytochrome c reductase 25.7 ± 2.8 34.8 ± 2.2
24.8 ± 1.5 31.7 ± 2.6 15,7 ± 1.1b
1410
• Average ± S.D. as in Table 3.
b Significantly changed from control group by unpaired t lest for at least 3 separate determinations
at p < 0.05.
c Significant at ~ < 0.01.
CANCER RESEARCH VOL 41
Ti04231222
