NYSA TI Multipage 2
Neoplasms, "and Control Groups 2
Abstract
Antibodies t~o Epstein-Barr Virus in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Other Head and Neck Neoplasms, "and Control Groups 2,=
Fields
- NYSA numbers
- 3028 B1793 03B
- Named Organization
- Johns Hopkins University
- Date Loaded
- 27 Jan 2005
- Box
- 0453. PR Pubs. -AHD/SMS (11)
- Folder
- Scientific Perspective Back-Up Larynx
- Division
- Public Affairs
Document Images
Antibodies t~o Epstein-Barr Virus in Naso-
pharyngeal Carcinoma, Other Head and Neck
Neoplasms, "and Control Groups 2,=
* l~cccivc~ September 29, 1969: accepted Octobc~ 6, 1969.
~ Inv~6ga~o~ ~pportcd by Public H~th S~icc ~anU
PH~3~77 ~d PH~2~5 ~ the
Br~h Emp~c ~ Campai~ f~ R~ ~c Swc~h
from ~= ~a~on~ Imt~ of H~.
Ph~ade]phi~ ~d ~h~l o~ ~edicin~ Univ~;W of
Pennsyh.ani~ Ph~addphla, P~n~
~ Roy~ Hong gong 2~key Oub Im~t~tc of
Que~ Eli~ Hmpi~, K~l~n, Hong gong.
~ Insti~t de Recherches $ci~d£qu~
~dl~ju~ Franc~
~ ]n~mt O~tavc Ro~ ~'~cj~, F~c~
I Dep~tm~t of H~d ~d ~e~ S~g~, ~yatta
Radoa~ Hospi~, ~akobi, K~y~
t Dcp~t of Tumor 3;do~,
~{cdic~ ~oo~, St~hd~ Swcd~
IAgC, Lyon~ Fr~c~
~ Pzs~ address: ~umhe~e~ K~o~nska Ins~tute,
S~hd~ Swede.
~ We ~l~uHy ac~owledge the
s~t~ce of ~c Adam, ~
AngOla Pactzd, and H. C. Kwh."
.NOTICE Ir;;.; :Z - "" . B'- PROTECfED.
: ~,~CO.P..Y.RIGIII" tA,,' UITLE IZ U, S. ~ _I).:~'_
T104132447

~n pat;enN w;l~ neoplasms o~h~r lhan NPC. ~e si~nffi~nce and
lions o~these/indin~s are discu.ed.~J Nat Cancer In~ 44: ~5-~31,1970.
THE EPSTEIN-BAILR virus (EBV) was shown to
be etiologically related to infectious mononucleosis
(I-3). This i:indin~ does not preclude the pos-
sibility that this virus or a varlant of it is also
involved under as yet undefined conditions in the
gcnesls of two malignancies~ i.’., Burkitt~s lymphoma
(BL) and nasopharyngcal carcinoma (NPC). Such
a link is suggested among others by the fact that
African patients wlth either of these tumors ahd
Chinese NPO paticnts,'~cncr.alIy possess anti-
bodies to EBV-related. antige'.ns, usually at re-
mark.ably higher titers than appropriate controls.
These antibodies arc detectable by: a) indirect
immunofluorescencc tests on acetone-fixed smears
of cells from EBV-carrying ceil lines (d~ 5)..There
is evidence that .this test mcasux'es~ essentlaIIy,
antibodies to RB viral antigens (6); b) indirect
immunofluorescencc or~ more dependable now,
blocking of dlrcct immunofluorescencc reactions
with llve cells from 1"~.BV.-positive blastoid cell
lines (7~ ~). This technique detects antibodies to
ceil membrane ant.igcns which are largdy distinct
from viral antigens but apparently EBV induced
(9~ 10);. and ~) doublc-di~uslon precipitation tests
~v'ith concentrated extracts from EBV-carrying
cell lines (11). Thls technique most likdy measures
yet other components of the EBV-related antigen-
antibody spectrum (1~.
In a previous stu.dy (13) and work to be reported
elsewhere~ results obmlned by these three tests
with sera from a limited number of African an.d
immunofluoresccncc tests on fixed cell smears
which measure antibodies mainly to Epsteln-Barr
virus (EBV) antigens and is most readily suitable
for large-scale testing. Numerous sera each from
a) NPO patients, b) patients with other naso-
pha.ryngeal neoplasms, or carcinomas or other
neoplasms arising elsewhere in the head and neclq
and ’) various control groups were tltrated for
antibodies to EBV. Results reaffirmed the remark-
able predominance of high tlters in the N.P(3
group and showed also that the incidence of high
titers increased as the disease advanced.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
~ra.~Thesc were ~btalncd from patients with
carcinomas and other neoplasms of the nasopharynx
and other parts of the head and neck. ~
"'.Th~ ~ were kindly fur-
nighed by Dr. F. ]3. Bang and Dr. S. R. S. Rangan~
"Johns Hopkins University, School of Hygiene,
Baltimorc~ /d'aryland. The patients wcrc classified
as to the primar~ sltc and h|stopathology of the
tumor. As a rul% these dam became available for
correlation only after the. serological tests had been
performed.
"Control scra wcrc obtained from blood relatives
and neighbors of East African NPC patients who
Chinese i~aticnts with IN.PC~ other n.coplasm~ or resided near Fort Hall and IGambu in the high-
on- eovlas c wen. h thy ia d oi r:e r .
Chinesc.c~:~atrOl scra were secured
donors, were corrdatcd with each other and with
the histdogical diagnoses. Although the result~ of
the scrolo~6cal tests were generMly "doncordant~
discrcpandes were noted~ as one might expect in
tests measuring essentially different antigcrl-ant{-
body systems. High antibody reaetivh7 by.any one
of the tests was frequent in NPC but was occasional
also in other head and neck neoplasms and con-
trois. The present report is restricted to indlreet
from patients with .non-neoplastlc discases~ family
members of patients, and pregnant women. Indian
control sera were obtained from blood donors and
patients with minor'ill.nesses. The sera werd .sent by
air to Philadc.Iphla undch d~:y-icc rcfrigcration and
used without inactivation.
Titration ~f.antibodies to EBY.~Technlqucs have
been fully described (l~
JOURNAL OF "/"HE NATIONAL CANCER.
T!04132448

NA$OPHARYI~GEAL CARCL~OMA
227
RESULTS
The scrolo~cal results obtained with various
groups of sera are prescnted in table l as to the
distribution of anti-EBV titers~ the geometric
mean ]evel~ and the percentages of negative
scra (~1:10) and sera with high titers (~_ 1:160).
All NPC patients from East Africa and Hong Kong
had antibodies to EBV, 85% at fliers of _>-1 :160,
and the geometric mean lords were'l:394 and
1:340, respectively. Among the French patients,
only 6. were possible NPC cases---obviously too
few for a meaningful analysis. In contrast, patients
with carcinomas in other sites of the head and
neck, or with other" types of tumor~ in the naso-
pharynx or elsewhere in the head and neck,
whether" from East Africa, Hong Kong, India, or
France, had generally lower titers oi" even no
antibodies to EBV. Only from 9-27% (mean
13%) had fiters >_ 1 : 160, and the geometric mean
alters ranged from 1:28-1:80, with a mean of
1:36, which was nearly ten times lower than the
mean alter of all NPC patients (1:348). Sera from
control individuals in Africa (family members and
neighbors of NPC. patients), Hong Kong (family
members of patients, pregnant women, and
l~atients with non-neoplastic diseases), and India
(blood donors and patients with minor ilia.eases)
gave results like those from scra of patients with
neoplasms of the head and neck other than NPC.
The percentages with anti-EBV titers _~1:160
ranged from 10-26 (mean I lA%) and the geo-
metric mean titers from .1:35-I :46 (mean 1:57).
The results obtained with the control group were
comparable to'those in the controls for Burkitt's
lymphoma patients (5").
The histology of NPC was described most fre-
quendy as anaplastlc, undifferentiated, or poorly
differentiated, and only occasionally as moderately
differentiated. It was usually specified as squamous
or epider.moid. Among patients grouped according
to the histologlcal appearance of the carcinomas,
no significant differences became apparent in the
distribution of anti-EBV alters.
Information on the NPC patients from Hong
Kong included the stage of their disease (14, ]$).
Serological data were correlated with this "disease-
stage" classification (table 2), and the incidence
of high anti-EBV thers showed successive increases.
from 44.5% in stage I to 100% in stage V. The
geometric mean anti-E, BV alters ros.e stepwise from
1 : 103-1 : 788 as the disease advanced.
The results were not influenced by the sex or
the age. of the Chinese NPC patients. In this
series, male exceeded female patients by a factor
of slightly greater than 2. Only 7% were under the.
Tx~,~ 1.--Anti-EBV titers in patlent~ ~Sth nasophar3mgeal carcinoma (NPC), neoplasms at ot.her sites
of head
and neck (Olq), and controls (CO)
2~um- Number with mat~-EBV titers of
Sourc~ Group bet
Geomegrlo Pereen$
~10 10 20 40 80 160 320 640
1280 2560 giter ~10 ~160
East A~rlca NPC 70 0 1 1 2 (; 9 14
18 18 1 1 :.394 0 85. 7
ON* 69 5 5 9 25 16 - 4 4
1 0 0 1:44 7.2 13.1
COt 105 7 18 24 29 21 8 3
.0 0 " " 0 1:38 6.7 10.5
Hong Kong NPC 165 0 '1 2 9 13 35 29
41 30 5 1:340 84. 8
ON 28 0 3 8 9 5 1 2
0 0 0 1:40 0 10. 6
CO 113 9 14 "29 34 16 8 1
1 1 0 1:35 8 9. 9
India ON 22 2 1 2 4 ? 3 2 0 1 0 1:'80
9 " 27. ~
CO 19 0 2 4 7 1 8 1 0 I 0 1:46
0 26. 2
France . NPC 6 0" 0 1 0 2 0 2
1 b 0 1: 61 0 50. 0
ON. 66 10 19 6 13 2 3 2
1 0 0 1:28 15. 1 9, 1
All NPC 241 0 2 4 11 21 44 45
60 48 6 1:348 0 84.2
ON 185 17 28 25 51 30 11 .10 2
1 0 1:36 9.2 13.0 '
CO 23? 16 29 57 70 38 19 5 1
2 0 1:87 6.? 11.4
Carelnom~ at slt~ other tbsn n~ophtt~r~ and neop~s
t Relatlv~ of NPC p~tlents (Emt ~ and Hong
and pregna~t~omen ~on’ ~on~.
VOL. 44~ NO. 1, JANUARY 1970
Tl04132449

age of 30 years and 94,
the4th. 5th, 6th, and 7th de.de oflif~
Among neop]as~ o~er ~an
no~ d~wh~e in ~e h~d and
v~ons t~ of ~rco~ adenom~ m~anom~
fibrom~, etc. ~s group did not include lymph~
~rcom~, redc~um ce~ sarcom~ or H~g~n's
dis~e w~ had been s~died p~o~y for
compa~son wi~ BL and rev~led an~-EBV r~c-
tiom gene~ly like ~ose in con~ol ~oups (5).
~en ~e ~rcinomas other ~an NPO in ~e
present seri~ were separated ~om neopl~ oth~
than c~cinom~ (table 8), ~e dis~b~fion ofand-
EBV tite~ the incidence of high tit~ and the
gcomcwic m~n Icvck were d~cly si~l~
~o ~oups so obmlncd.
~rcinomas o~ ~an NPC wcrc subdiMd~
into ~osc a~slng in ~c p~an~ sinus~, 1ons~
and soft palate, ten.c, oral ~ (not further
specified), and h~opha~ and la~. Tcxt-
fibre 1 shows no difference ~ong ~c ~oups
~ m ~e dls~ibu~on of anfi-EBV fitch. ~rre-
spending dam for the ~PC pa~cn~, included for
comparison, revealed again ~c s~ingly high~
anfib~y levels in t~s mali~ancy.
DISCUSSION
The data confirm carllcr reports on the unusual
frequency of high and-EBV titcrs among patients
DIS'I'RIBUI"ION OF ANTI-EBV TITERS
IN CARCINOMAS OF HEAD AND NECK
ANTI- EBV TITER
TZ.XT-rXO~RZ 1.wDLstribudon of anti-EBV tltcrs among
patients with nasopharyngcal carcinomas and carcinomas
elsewhere in head and neck.
with NPC (8, 10, 13, 16). Most of these patients had
carcJnomas described "as anaplasfic, undiffercnfi- "
ated, or poorly differentiated. When further spedfi-
cations were given, the squamous or epldermoid
type predorrdnated. Similar types of carcinomas
elsewhere in ~hc' head and neck were much less
frequently accompanied by high and-EBV titers.
..~In fact~ the percentage of scra from th~s group of
patients with fitcrs ~_1:160 was only slightly
higher than that in the control series, i.e., relatives
TA~ 2.--Rdation of stage of NPC to anti-EBV levels (Heat Kong patients)
Number of
Anti-gBV Geometric
Stage patients
tlters mean anti-
~l:-lO0, (~) EBV titer
Confined ~o NP ~nucosa ~)
44. 5 1:103
Tumor extended to adjacent parts bdow base of skull without
bone involvement and/or mobile nodes in upper cervical region ~
above skin crease extending from below laxyngeal prominence
backward ~ound neck 16 8~. ~ 1:235
Bone aed/or cranial nerve involvement ~nd/or mobile nodes
in reg|~ns between upper cervical and supraelavioular fossae ;
and/or ~xed nodes above supraelavieular lessee 86 8L 5 1:288
~nvolvem~nt of nodes in supraclavicular fossae irrespective
of local extent of primary tumor ~ 97. O 1:595
Hematogenous metastases or involvement of nodes or skin
below the clavicles 10 100 1:788
165
8~. 8 1: 310
l.II.
All paticnt~
i
~OURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INST1TO'I1~
T104132450

~ASO~n-Z~RYtCOZ~L C~CmO~.A 229
" TAZ~ 3.---Comparison of p~t~en~ with c~cinom~ of the n~oph~nx ~P~, p~ wi~h carcinom~ arising
' at oth~ si~ of bead and neck (OC), and patien~ with tumom oth~ than earc~nom~ (O~
Number with snti-EBV ti~ers of Geometric
Neopl~m Number mea~
Percent
~10 10 20 40 80 160320 640 1280 2560 ~10 ~160
NPC 241 0 2 4 11 21 44 45 60 48 6 1:348
0
OC 129 15 22 14 84 26 ? 8 2 1 0 1:41
1L? 13.9
OT" 52 3 6 9 15 12 4 3 0 0 0 1:43
and nclghhors of NPC patients, patients with non-
neoplastic d~e~ blo~ donom, and pre~ant
women,
M~t ~ were t~ted ~out ~ow]cdgc of &e
~ini~l or hlstolo#cM diagnose. F~ermor% ~c
dlagnos~ of mmc pafien~ considered inifi~y to
be NP~ mbsequenfly were .~anged when ~e
~stolo~ w~ r~iewed ~out prior ~owlcdge of
the ~olo#~ data. ~en ~ ~fimatc dini~
and Mstol~ diagnos~ w=e co,dated wi~ ~c
sero]o~, most pafienm who no longer qud~
for ~c ~ ~tcgo~ had low anfi-EBV titers
(~:m).
Scrim ~ ~om several ~i~n NPC pafienu
were co,cacti for several mont~ and t~ted; as
in patlcnts ~ BL (5~ ~$)~ the titers remained
. constant or, at most~ showed minor, possibly tech-
nic~ fluctmfions. B~ore any form of g~en~
the ~ouping of ~e Hong Kong NPC pa~enu into
stag~ I-V (I4) revealed, however, successive
creas~ in ~e incidence ~f ~gh anfi-EBV
and in ~e geome~c m~n lev~ as ~e d~e
advanced~ ~or~ ~e app~ent constancy of
titem i~ ~e ~ri~n NPG pafien~ ~ght conceiv-
ably be rdated to a reduction in ~e canc~ c~
populafio~ wi~ a eog~ponding de~e in
EBV-relat~ an~gens for anfib~y
and to i~osuppr~sion~ as a reset of chem~
~a~y or mdio~erapy. F~ hor~onml smdi~
of pafien~ ~e in pro~ to ass~ ~ po~ib~i~.
In an~ ev~ ~e persistence of ~gh anfi-EBV
leve~ ~ ~.~o m~ignanci~ con~asU wi~
ebse~afiom ~ ~ecfious mononucleosis. In ~
dls~s% w~ ~ ~ecog~zed mos@ ~ong adol~
cen~ and ad~ of ~gh socioeconomic
antib~im to EBV are formed d~ no~ and, ~t~
passing p~ fit~ tend to ~t genera~y at low~
.~ough r~dfly detectable leveh fo~ y~, ~ not
for lge (~). C~dho~ pri~ ~V ~ec~o~
VOL. 44~ NO. I~ ~ANUARY 1970
common under low socioeconomic conditions and
generally unrecognized, seem to account for most
of the persisting low antibody levcls in populations
at large (S).
The data presented suggest some association of
EBV with NPC. This suggestion is further based
on the results of two other serological tests measur-
ing chiefly antibodies to other EBV-rdatcd anti-
gem: g) the precipitation of antigens extracted
from EBV-earrylng Burkitt tumor cell lines
and b) the demonstration of antibodies to mem-
brane antigens of cultured blastoid cells of EBV-
carrying lines derived from Burkitt's lymphomas
(7-10), leukocytes of infectious mononucleosis
patients (17), and now also _NPC (18).
EBV replication presently appears restricted to
cells of the lymphoreticular systcm and thus~ if
oncoger~c or cocarclnogenic, could well be in-
volved, in the etiology of BL. There is presendy
no explanation why NPC should show the ap-
parent association with EBV, whereas carcinomas
elsewhere in the head and neck do not. A sug-
gestion has been made that NPC might arise
from thyrnlc remnants of the Waldeyer ring (19).
NPC is known to be intcrsperscd~ as a rule, with
variable amounts o.f lymphoid clcments~ but car-
cin'bmas arising in other parts of the Waldeyer's
ring~ such as tonsils and back of tongue~ in which
the carcinoma cells are similarly interspersed with
lymphoid tlssue~ are much less frequently associated
with a high titer of antibodies to EBV-rdated
antigens. Furthermore., according to-Teoh (~0),
the presence of both lymphoid and epithelial
structures was not observed in NPC metastases
othcr than those in lymph glands.
Posslbly~ EBV plays merely a passenger role in
NPC. The increase in anti-EBV titers with ad-
vancement of the disease does not differentiate
between a passenger role and a causal relationship.
o o
T!04132451

In ~th~ case~ |ncreas~ngly more viral antigens
would pr~umably becom~ available for sfimulao
~on of antibody formation as the tumor rrm~
enlarges. The sarr/~ question has ~risnn with regard
to BL. Pa~ent~ with ~is malignancy also reveal
hlgh antibody ac6vhies to EBV-related antigens.
If the virus were merely a passenger in these
lymphomas, other tumors, such as lcukcm|~s,
rc~iculum cell sarcomas~ Hodgkln's d~scasc, and
muhiplc myclomas should offer similarly favorable
habitats for EBV, which, indeed, they do not (5).
There is cvldcncc for a possibly genetically
dctcr~ncd predisposition to develop NPC among
Chinese (]5). Such a prcd|sposi6on could b’
assoc|atcd with factors which pcrmh EBV to have
either a direct function in" the transformation of
target.cells or a priming role for subscqucnt action
of carc.~nogcnlc or cocarclnogcnlc agcnts.~pr~-
fcction~ and patterns of EBV-rclatfid scrologlcal
rcactlons in a population at high risk, such as
that of Hong Kong or "Singapore, mi~mh~p
c''=~ ......... "-- ~ _.:.₯ LC .....
REFERENCES
(I) I'~ O.~ Hr~z.~ W.~ and Dm~x~ V.: Rela~ou of
B~kiR's ~umor-~iated h~-~ v~ to
~fio~ monvnude~..P~ Nat Acad ~ USA
59: ~I01, l~. '
(2) N~, J. C., Mc~, R. W., Hxsm, G.,
~d ~ W.: Infccdo~ mononuclem~. Cl~ic~
m~mdom ~ rdadon m EB ~ andb~.
"(3) G~ P., H~ D., Mov~ R. A, and
~ E.: I~6o~ ~ononudeo~: complem~t-
~g ~u~i~ to h~-Jike ~ ~iated
B~ ]ymphom~ ~cnce 161 : 17~175, 1968.
(~) ~ G, ~d H~ W.: I~unofluvr~cncc
~ d~ivcd ~m B~kiR'z lymphoma. J B~t 91:
(5) H~ G., ~, W., ~roRv, P., D~u~ V.,
~ ~" B~kiu'a lymphoma and con~ol ~ou~
J Nat ~nc~ I~t 43: 1147-I157,
V~ ~d H~ O.: ~mp~a6~ studF of
t~ B~kht minor c~h by I~ofluo~c~
u~o~aphy, ~d ~on ~o~y. J V~
!: 8~7, 1~7.
ET. AL.
(7) Kr.zm, G., Kt.~m; E., and ~,~, P.: S~h for
h~t d~ ~ BurHU lymphom~: mcanbrane
immunofluo~c’ t~ on blopsi~ and ~ue
cul~ lin~ Can~ R~ 27: 251~20, 1~7.
(~) K~, O., P~sos, G., H~, O., H~s~, ~.,
Go~s~m, G., ~nd ~rro~v, P.: Relation ~twc~
Epst~-B~ vir~ and c~l memb~e immunw
fluo~ence in B~kht tumor c~l~ III. Comp~n
~f H~Hng of d~t membrane ~mmunofluor~
cencc and ~6-EBV rcacfivi6~ of di~c~nt
J ~ ~cd 129: 697-705, 1~9.
(9) K~m, G., P~, G., N~o~m, J. S.,
3. 3-, K~m, E., H~, G., H~, W., and
CL:rro~, P.: Rda~on be~e~ Epst~n-Ba~ viral
and c~l memb~n’ immunofluo~ence of Burkitt
tumor celk. L Depend~ce of c~ membrane
immunofluor~ence on pr~ce of EB
~p Meal 128:1011-1020, !~.
(10) P~A~sos, G., ~, O., H~ G., H~, W., and
CLarion, P.: R~a6on between Epst~-Ba~ ~r~
and c~ ~embrane i~munofiuor~cc ~ Burkltt
minor c~is. IV, D~a6on be~e~ anu~o~
r~ponsible for membr~e and ~ i~un~
fluo~ce. J ~p Med 129: 707-718,
E., G~o, O., W~L~sSO~, B.~ and
P.: P~cipha~g ~fibody in human ~m
an~g~ pr~t in "cuh~ed B~klu'z lymphoma
c~ls. F~ Nat Acad Scl USA 55: 169~!7~,
19~. -
(12) K~m, G., ~r~o, P., Hz~, G., H~, W.,
GEz~mo~ G.~ and O~, L. J.: EBV-~iated
s~ologi~ pat~ns ~ a Bur~tt lymphoma patient
d~g r~ion ~d recurrence. Int J Canc~
4: 41~21, 1959.
(13) ~ Sc~ ~., Fgme~’, S., K~, G.,
W., H~, O., ~ ~, O., ~r~o~, P., ~d
Ho, H. C.: Epst~n-B~ v~
~6body pat1~ ~ carcinoma of ~’
spa~. ~ Exp ~uno]. In
(14) Ho, H. C.:. CHnlc~ $~mg of n~opha~'ngc~
no~ ~ use at ~e Medlc~ and H~ Depa~m~t'
lns~mte of Ra~o]o~, Hong Kong. In pr~p~fion.
(15) ~: Pa,~ II: C~c~ of N~opb~n~ UICC
Mono~ S~I~, Vo[ 10.;'Nin~hIn~at Canc~
~ngr ~a~, R. J. ~, ed.). B~]~, Heid~,
New York, Spzing~ V~lag, 1~7, pp
(16) H~, W., ~d ~, G.: ~t ~ of lhe"
h~-group v~ ~a~ed wi~ c~m~ of ~e
he~topole6c $yste~ In P~6v~ ~
~. New Yor~ Academe Pr~ In~, 1~, pp
l 0~124.
E~t~-B~ v~ ~d c~l mem~r~c immun~
fiu~ence ~ B~Hu ~mor e~ls. II. ~mpa~on
JOURNAL OF TIi~ NATIONAL CANER INSTITUTE
i
Ti04132452

NASOPHAP~3~'N~ EAL ~ARCINO}~A
231
of ~ and sera from pat~r_n~ w~th Burldtt',
]ymphoma and. infcct~ous rnononur-Icm~. J ~xp
]vfcd 128: 1021-1030, 19~8.
(18) o~. T~ G.~ .AJ~R.OS~OHT, J. C., Ho, H. C.," and
Kw.~, I'L C.: Lymphoblasto|d lransformat~on and
prese.nc~ of herpes ~ viral par~de~ in a Chlnesc
nasopharyngcal turnout cuhur~! h ~t~. Nature
(London) RRl: 770-77}, 1g59.
(1~) W~ss-r~m, 1’. B.: The s|tc of o~q~n oF anaplas~ic
tumors o1" ~hc pos~cr]or nasal space../'n Cancer in
Africa (Clifford, P-I Linsdll C. A., and Timms,
G. L., cds.). Nalrobl, East African Pub! Home.,
! 968., p. 393.
(20) Tzo~, T. B.: Epidcrrfioid cardnoma of the naso-
pharynx a.mong Chinese. J Path Bact 73: 451-465~
1957.
VOL. 44~ NO. I~ ~]ANUARY 1970
T!0.4132453
