NYSA Indexed
STATEMENT OF REP. JAMES H. SCHEUER SUBCOMMITTEE ON AVIATION OCTOBER 7, 1987
Abstract
Lor thin opportunity to support of a smoking ban on all domestic airline Bach year americans take more than 300 million plane trips and airline cabins are the workplace Lor about 70 000 attendants The airliner cabin environment aireotty affects the
Fields
- Box
- 5617. Miscellaneous Issue Material
- Airline Smoking Ban 88
- DOT Appropriations Bill
- NYSA numbers
- 0044 B1793 02C
- Type
- STATEMENT
- Author
- Scheuer, James H.
- Named Person
- Bach
- Bucks, George
- Dole, E
- Koop, Everett C
- Named Organization
- Academy Of Sciences
- National Academy Of Sciences
- Senate
- Surgeon General
- Thesaurus Term
- government agency
- airplane
- indoor air quality
- research activity
- anti-smoking advocacy
- Keyword
- Environmental Tobacco
- Author (Organization)
- House of Representatives
Document Images
George Bucks 202/225-.5473.
Mr. Chairman, Thank you £or thin opportunity to
support of a smoking ban on all domestic airline-fl£ghtso Bach
year americans take more than 300 million plane trips, and airline
cabins are the workplace. £or about 70,000 ~llght: attendants. The
airliner cabin environment aireotty affects the health of eve.zyone
on board.
~or ~oo long, we have been led to believe that, when we
boarded a c~eroial airliner, we bad a choice het~esm a smoking or
non-smoking section. After scores of snient££ic s~udies, we
know ~hat the only real choice a person has on a commercial flight
.is between smoking and passive smoking -- and as tar as one's
health is concerned, that's no choice at all.
The ~atlonal Academy of Sciences in its report; Environmental
Tobacco Smo~e: Measurlna ExPosures an~ Assessln~ ~ealth Effects,
estimated that passive smoking (breathing environments/ tobacco
smoke) is responsible £or approximately 2~4~0 lung ~ancer deaths
aen~sl-lyo This compares to between 1,300 and ~,7~0 new caner
cases (all sites) resulting from toxic air pollutan~s in ~he
general environment.
The enclosed envlrosmen~, llm~ted ventilation and close
prox£mi~ of passengers aboard airplanes makes passive smoking
unavoidable. A~rplanes also have tmiqse clime%Is conditions such
as I~ relative hnmldlty and high levels of ozone which may
exacerbate the effects of passive smoking by passengers and crew.
Surgeon General C. Everett Koop's 1966 report, The Health
Conseonen~es of Tnvoluntar~' gr~ok~.na, provided a er~.tical ~evlew of
the available evidence pertaining to the health e£fects of passive
smoking. The Repor~ represented the work of more than 60
scientists, representing a variety of d~scipllnes. The Report
concluded ~hat passive smoking is a cause of disease# including
lung oanoe~ in healthy nonsmokers.
The Surgeon General's Report declared that the simple
separation of smokers and nonsmokers within the same air space may
reduce, but does not eliminate, exposure of ne~smokers to environ-
mental tobacco smoke.
In. 1986, the National Academy of Sciences completed a
Congresslonally-mandated study on airline passenger cabin air
quallty. The Study concluded that, for health and safety, reasons,
al~ smoking aboard domestic commercial flights be prohibited. The
nclentlf~o panel concluded that both passengers ~ members
were harmed by drifting smoke in aircraft cabins and that cigarette
smoking posed a significant fire hazard on board as well.
In response to that report, I've introduced legislation, The
Airline Anti-Smokin~ Ae~ (H.R. 432) to b~n smoking on all domestic
airline £1igbts. This legislation would lessen Irrltati4a and
d~scc~fort to passengers and crew, reduce potenti~l healg_k hazards
T!0045-1337

:~.~,~.'. ~.-...... ~ ...... . .. ........ .~.... ............
~.~-+_~-~.~.~+++..,
.... ~"- " : "" ~'. "': : .-~. '~ . "~ .~.: " ~echaps aos~ ~11£ng~ £s ~e ~docs~
H.R. 412 has rece£ved
• " • • . . . . . -~ ..... ~.~ ~e ~oc£a~£on or
~1£9h~ ~end~s (22,000 s~ong) and ~e
.... ~ £s ~e Ma~£onal Aca~em~.o~
Sc£ences' c~clus£on ~a~ ~
attendant~ ~h~e the same amount o~ smoke at work as .someone
ltvin_a with a c.ack-a-da_v smoker.
• Recently Tr~spor~atton Secre~a:~ EItZ~ Dole re~ec~ ~e
on ~1 domest£c fl£ghts within ~e U.S. Clea=ly~ no
solution to ~£s heal~ ~=ea~ is forthc~ng. Sin~ the A~in-
istca~ion won't act+ Congress mus~
~e: the pa8~ 10' years~ at~tudes a~u~ smoking ~ p~l~c
plaeen have changed. Currently, onlF 26t
popela~£on are :egula: ~oke:~ -- and that level c~tn~es to
decline. Nonsmokers are no longer ~ust tr:ikake5 ~stanaers when a
~oke¢ ltgh~ up in a p~bl£e place. We n~ kn~ that the non-
smoker's health is at risk ~¢ougb unavo£dable ~ss£ve ~oking.
~£s is e~ectally true In the closed envtro~ent of
cabin.
~e aouse £n ~ul~ app:oved ~ ~enen~ ~ok£ng
~omestic ¢ligh~ of two hours or less -- and ~e Senate App¢op
~tations Co, tree recently app~ove~ a similar ~¢ee-year
~n o~er sim¢iar actlons, Air C~a~a h~ £nstitute~ smokeless
El£ghts ~tween Mew York ~d Toronto, and ~ust last week, Call-
~o¢n£a legislators pass~ a smoking b~ on in-state flights,
effective Janua~ 1, 1988.
~ ~e Surgeon Gene~al s~ted: "~e =ight of ~e smoker to
~oke stops at ~e po£nt where his or her smoking ~ncreases ~e
d£sease r~sk in ~ose ~cup~tng ~e s~e enviro~ent.
Let's keep the clouds outs1~ of the a~rcraft where they
belong.
T10045-1338
