NYSA Indexed
[Re: Aircraft Smoking Ban]
Abstract
Thank you for your recent letter concerning the importance of recognizing the rights of airline passengers to have a separate smoking section in an aircraft I agree with the points you raised concerning the necessity of having certain designated areas
Fields
- Box
- 5617. Miscellaneous Issue Material
- Airline Smoking Ban 88
- DOT Appropriations Bill
- NYSA numbers
- 0044 B1793 02C
- Type
- Letter
- Author
- Helms, Jesse
- Damato, Alfonse
- Hughes, Charles
- Recipient
- Hughes, Charles
- Kurtz
- Mozingo, Roger
- Named Person
- Filter, Don
- Hart
- Laiiy, J
- Ntucky, K
- Rose, Charlie
- Named Organization
- Senate Appropriations Committee
- Tobacco Institute
- United States Senate
- Thesaurus Term
- airplane
- legislation
- smoking restriction
- Congress
Document Images
TI0045-1257

LAI~Iy J. HO;=ialv~, K~.NTUCKY'.
PAT 1~0~ E.'tTS, KANSAS
September 21, 1987
Mr. CharlesHughes
Post Office Box 487
Stedman, Nc 28391
Dear Mr. Hughes:
Thank you for your recent letter concerning the importance
of recognizing the rights of airline passengers to have a
separate smoking section in an aircraft.
I agree with the points you raised concerning the necessity
of having certain designated areas on an airplane for smoking,
particularly in light of the problems that can be caused in
flight if someone does smoke in a lavatory. When an amendment
was offered earlier this year to limit smoking on flights of a
short duration, I did not support the amendment, and I want to
assure you that I will continue to oppose efforts to restrict
smoking on airlines.
Once again, thank you for writing. If I can be of further
assistance to you on this or any other matter, I certainly hope
that you will not hesitate to contact me.
With best wishes.
Charlie Rose
Chairman
TI0045-1258

WASH|NGTON~ D.C. 20510
September 8, 1987
Mr. Charles Hughes
P.O. Box ~87
Stedman, North Carolina
28391
Dear Mr. Hughes~
Thank you for your letter regarding legislation to
ban smoking on airline flights. I appreciate having
your commen'ts.
The current airline smoking restrictions which
separate smokers and nonsmokers are reasonable and
favored by the majority of passengers. Every passenger
who requests one is guaranteed a seat in a no-smoking
section even if a smoking section must be reduced or
eliminated.
I have never suggested that there is anything
"healthy" about the excessive use of any number of
products--including cigarettes. I have always
supported the position that the choice to smoke tobacco
or not is a question that should be left to the
indivldual--not the federal government. Until the
majority of the American people decide to make
cigarette smoking illegal, I will continue to fight for
the rights of the farmers in my state to grow a legal
product and make a living.
Again, I appreciate your sharing your views with
me on this controversial and divided issue.
With ~._"~dest r~:g~.rds.
Sincerely,
Jesse Helms
United States Senate
JH/grv
TI0045-'1259

ALFONSE D'N4JAT0
52o HART BUILDING
NEV~ YORK
[202) 224-6542
WASHING'I'ON, DoC. 205t0
September 11, 1987
Ms. V. Kurtz
20083 Suncrest Drive
Booksville, Florida
3~601
Dear Ms. Kurtz:
Thank you for contacting me and please excuse the delay in
replying.
• ~.~= "~'.'~ o~ Representatives passed the amend-
ed va~ ...... ~.9 .... ne Yransportatlon Appropriations Bill,
by a vote o~ 28~-i0~. One of the more controversial amendments
was Ho~~~nt Noo 350. Simply stated, Amendment No. 350
,ba1~s all smokin~.g~n domestic commercial flights of 2 hours or
Forces on both sides of the smoking issue are gearing-up for.
a battle on whether or not this amendment will be included in the
final version of this bill. Smokers are concerned that any type
of ban no matter how limited will eventually encompass all air
travel on U.S. carriers. Many feel that the current regulations
specifying that all non-smokers are guaranteed a seat and relegat-
ing smokers-to one portion of an aircraft are good enough.
Non-smokers argue that the confines of an airplane necessi-
tate a smoking ban. They cite the potential health hazards of
second-hand smoke permeating the cabin, affecting all of the pas-
sengers; especially children. Flight attendants, too, complain
that, due to the nature of their jobs, they breathe in excessive
amounts of passive smoke. Airline pilots, on the other hand, are
worried about potential fires that could be started by passengers
smoking illegally in the lavatories.
H.R. 2890 is currently before the Senate Appropriations Com-
mittee, on which ~ serve. You may be certain that I will weigh
the views of all my constituents as this bill is considered.
I welcome the opportunity to address your concerns.
Sincerely,
Alfonse D'Amato
United States Senator
AD:es
260

• ~ DON FILTER
7"0: :',~ ~',)
El For Your h~formation
[] Hease Handle
6221 Hill Avenue, P.O. Box 7497
Toledo, Ohio 43615
Telephone: (419) 865-1151
TI0045-1261
