NYSA CTR 1
February12,1996 The Council for Tobacco Research - USA, Inc. Supporting Biomedical Investigation
Abstract
The Council for Tobacco Research - USA, Inc. Supporting Biomedical Investigation 900 3rd Avenue New York, NY10022 Tel:
Fields
- Named Organization
- American Association for the Advancement of Science
- CBS (Columbia Broadcasting System)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Columbia University
- Council for Tobacco Research - USA (CTR) (Formerly Tobacco Industry Research Committee (TIRC))Originally organized as the Tobacco Industry Research Committe(TIRC) in 1954, and renamed Council for Tobacco Research - USA, Inc. (CTR) in 1964.
- John Wiley & Sons (Publisher)
- Kaufman (Advertising Agency)
- Memorial Hospital
- National Institutes of Health
- Sega
- Named Person
- Kestler, Harry W.
- Kingston, Brent R.
- Leet, Hye Young
- Lieberman, Howard B.
- Date Loaded
- 11 Jan 2006
- Box
- 0221
Document Images
ION x XND CELL t~IOL~Y
5~ Ann ~e~, In~, Da~I~
Pp. 35~371
Review Article
Schizosaccharotnyces pombe: A Model for Molecular Studies of
Eukaryotic Genes
YUQI ZHAOt and HOWARD B. LIEBERMAN
ABSTRACT
Several features of the fission yeast Schizosaecharomyces pombe make it exceptionally well suited
for the
study of eukaryotie genes. It is a relatively simple eukaryote that can be readily grown and
manipulated in
the laboratory, using a variety of highly developed and sophisticated methodologies.
Schizosaecharomyces
pombe cells share many molecular, genetic, and biochemical features with cells from multicelluiar
organisms, making it a particularly useful model to study the structure, function, and regulation of
genes
from more complex species. For examples, this yeast divides by binary fission, has many genes that
contain
introns, is capable of using mammalian gene promoters and polyadenylation signals, and has been used
to
clone mammalian genes by functional eomplementation of mutants. We present a summary of the biology
of S. pombe, useful features that make it amenable to laboratory studies, and molecular techniques
available to manipulate the genome of this organism as well as other eukaryotic genes within the
fission
yeast cellular environment.
INTRODUCTION
NItJMEROIIS F-'~XTURE.q OF THE FISSION YEAST Schizosac-
charomyces pombe make it an attractive model system
for molecular genetic studi~ of eukaryotic genes. This
small, relatively simple eukaryote possesses many of the
same fundamental cellular propetlies of larger, multicellular
organisms. However, it can be manipulated in the laboratory
readily and has a relatively short doubling time, making it
amenable to many types of experiments. Furthermore, S.
pombe has a relatively small genome size, approximately
1.5 x 107 bp in the haploid state, which is about three times
larger than that ofEscherichia coli. Allolh~r useful featare of
S. pombe is that it usually exists as a haploid organism. This
characteristic facilitates the creation and identification of
mutants. In addition, ceils c~n be mated to constrt~:t
with desired genetic backgrotmds and to study genes in
haploid a> ~,ell as diploid ceils. Haploids, diploids, and
tetrads can be purillcd and used for subsequent genetic
analysis.
The budding yeast S, wcharomyces cerevisiae has been
studied extensively. Thcretbre, what makes S. pombe, at the
least, another attractive nmdel system for studying eukary-
otie genes? Even though S. cerevisiae andS. pombe are both
ascomycetes, they are not very closely related evolution-
arily. Protein sequence comparisons have indicated that S.
pombe is nearly as distant from S. cerevisiae as it is from
mammals (Russell, tqSg) At the gene level, mammalian
introns can be spliced properly in fission yeast (Kaufer et al..
1985L and inlrons within S. pombe genes are also appropri-
ately spliced when a component of the yeast spliceosome, 02
snRNA, is replaced by a human equivalent (Shuster and
Gathrie, 1990L In addition, mammalian promoter and
poly(A) ~ign~s ,ae l'mtctiortal in S. pombe b~t not in S.
cere~i~tae (Russell, 1950 ). The con~er~ation of gene
ber~.een S, pombe ar~,~ mammals wa~ clearly demonstrated
Center for Rad~ological Research. Col!ege of Ph~ sicia~ and S~rgeor, x. Columbia Uni* or,., ,. N ~ ~
Yo:~.. NY 10032.
~P~eser~ add*e~s: l)¢par~men~ of ecd:amcs. N o.-'r.hweslem Uni~,ers.D Med~¢a! Cen:er. 23~ ,,
~i.-i' .lr:-i', Plaza. CTeica~,. IL f'X)514.
359

~ T
I~ L'q %T'£F~' O E.FECTI ON O~ Zi~\ C F'RO?,$ I I IV - I
s~ L~ clinical ~sol~:~ of ~'-I, i~cl~ding s~n~
n~cleoside in,biter 3' ~d~T.3'-di~eoxy~hymi~i~e (AZ~ or to the
ca~p~unds wcr~ also foun~ to be s}narg~s~ic wi~ A~. 2'.3'-
at (1995] ~e. in pre~). ~ md eo~rkers have
~m~nd~ ~t by "at~ng" ~h~ two zi~ fi~g¢~ of ~V nucle~apsid
protein (NCpT). E~idene* will he presented hhat
~n~O~ of ~e ~-HIV disul~d¢ ~n~ni~ e~t ~e from ~V
N~7 in ~i~o. ~ m~nimmd by ~c zinc-sg~tfie tluor~nI ~r~ TSQ.
S~c~ly si~ di~a~de ~ides ~at ~e ~ot ~6-~1 do not ej~
~. ~r do ~og$ of ~ ~dv~ com~aa~ "xi~ ~c disulfide ~pla~d
wi~ a me~yl~e sat~de. ~* ~ of NCp7 zi~
~mdt$ w~ found to ~ ~n-tat~abte .~M bicx~a~ffl.
mm of ejecdon ~om ~= C-m~ fi~c finger 7-fold f~ ~ ~at ~m
• e N-~. ~e ~v~M ¢om~ were fou~ to inh[bh ~ fine-
~nd~t b~ing of NCp7 to ~ ~A. ~ smfli~ by gel z~t
~, ~ ~elamd well with ~ z~e e~eedon da~. ~afi-~ disulfide
~n~d~ ~peeific~y e~t NC~7 zi~ ~d ~o2ish ~e pro~in% abitiw
to bind V RMA in rico. providing eviden~ for a possible ~tke~ovizA
meeh~ism of aet~n of ~e~ commune. ~ngene~ of
under adv~¢~ preeli~i~l ewluatioa ~ a ~*tcntial chemo~e~py for
g~uked i~u~efieiency
GRO~ArFH PROPERTI~q OF HSIVnot : HIV
CONTAINING THE NEF GENE FROM
PAT/"IC-X3EIqlC MOLECULAR CLONE SFVmnc239,
Yoont, Mi Ran Kangt, Hye Young Leet, Harry W. Kestler, IIIz,
Sung S. R.he~, and Sunyo',mg KimL tInstitute for Molecular
Biology and Genetics, Se~.tl National University, Korea; 2The
Cleveland Clirdc Foundation, US.A., ~San'tsuix$ Biomedical
Re*a=rch Institute, Korea
To elucidate the function of he/, we constructed infectious
chimeric don~ between HIV-I and SIV o~ macaques by
deleting a part of the mf sequence from the HIV-I genome
arid in~Iting the eatlre he[ gene from the pathogenic
molecular clone SlVmac239" resu,tting in H$1Vne[. HSIV
di~ers from SHIV previouMy reported by the fact that our
virt~ contains the HIM-I baeJtboa~ Two full-length proviral
HIV-1 donma, HXB2 and NL432, were used to construct HSIV
by deleting 250 bp of the nef gene startkng from its start ¢odon
and installing a tmique Noti site. This deletion left the HIV-I
lmlypurine tract and the ease U3 and R regio~ intact but
removed the ne, f gene, Th~ con~truct~ were generated for
each proviral done: (1) An~, which has a
the n~ reglorq (2) ~-NgF, which ¢ontalns SIV net in a
• er~e orientation; (3) HSIV-FEN, whir.h harbors SlY n~ in an
antisense orientatlon. Together with the original provlra,l
clones, the~e cor~tructs were transft<:ted tnto the human
embr,/or2e kidney cell line 293T. Ala c~nsWacts produced
I0-30 ng/rrd p2~ a.r~tige~ three days
s~ggesting that the hybrid c~nstnac~ could normally express
and pro<e~ gene products. Fartherm0re, cel~-free vh.-ust~
obtruded ~rom these transfect~ons pro<l~c~vdy
EXPI.IEJ'.',IO~'I OF HIV-I ~ GEI'~E INDUCES ClIAPIGE23. I, '
FISSIO;~ YE~.~F ~¢hlrol|cchuro~¥¢~ 12~_~_~SIMILA.R TO
INDUCED IN IIUMAN CKLLS, Yaq| Z~o'-~o Ji~ ~o'.
O'G~t z. Jun I ~s~', ~,~ g~ Yogtvt-t 'HIM ~m f~ ~ildrca and
~ aS a m~:l S~(~ [o ~dy CCt~ ¢ff~ Of HIV-1 ~
e~pve~ion, ~c ~ ~.~ac '~ cl~ into ~¢~ deriva~v~ of~c inducible
ceil culture.
5 <:

A~ST?-.:~CT~ OF THE -~:-~ CONFE27.NC:
Sessio~ 8. Slide
Virology: Reverse Transcription
and Regulation
Monday, 9:45 a.m.
P.ETI2-.OVI:UL':~, AND 072OXTU.NI:C INEEC"TIOXg
CharacleriT~ti+w~ ~f HIV.I Matdx Function: Analysis 0f
%qral P.e+ertaat+. ERIC O. F~D" AND M&LCOLM A.
NIAID. NIH. h=lh:~a biD
Ihos~ that: i) :,~.<ked virus assembly, ii) rcditcctcd
compar/mcnH. Hi) :nlcrfercd with virus entry, or iv)
blocked Env i.,.U,l:uration into virions without affecting
for two posit+~m 12 mutations which blocked Ear
lncor~oration i~t< :'~ric, a5, ~nd a Gln->Lys s~bstituti~n
I~S[~C 27 (i~ d,c L~A hlgbly-ha~ic do~tln) rcvet~¢d the
undcrslandi~ MA structur~functlon rclalions~ips and
dclincating tim role , MA in [he HW-I life cyct¢ will
21
C)'cle C2 .*.r~c+t in Fk,~I~o

DN,~, £~D CELL
P~. 35~-371
Review Article
Schizosaccharomyces pombe: A Model for Molecular Studies of
Eukaryotic Genes
YUQI ZHAO~ and HOWARD B. LIEBERMAN
ABSTRACT
Several features of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe make it exceptionally well suited
for the
stud.v ofeukaryotic genes. It is a relatively simple eukaryote that can be readily grown and
manipulated in
the laboratory, using a variety of highly developed and sophisticated methodologies.
Schizosaccharomyces
pombe cells share many molecular, genetic, and biochemical features with cells from multicellular
organisms, making it a particularly useful model to study the structure, function, and regulatio~ of
genes
from more complex species. For examples, this yeast divides by binary fission, has many genes that
contain
introns, is capable of using mammafian gene promoters and polyadenylation signals, and has been ~ to
clone mammalian genes by functional complementation og mutants. We present a summary ofthe biology
of S. pombe, useful features that make it amenable to laboratory studies, and nmlecuim" techniques
available to manipulate the genome of this organism as well as other eukaryotic genes within the
fission
yeast cellular environment.
INTRODUCTION
NUMEROUS FI~ATURES OF THE FISSION YEAST Schizosac-
charomyces pombe make it an attractive model system
for molecular genetic studies of eukaryofic genes. This
small, relatively simple eukaryote pos~sses many of the
same fundamental cellular properties of larger, multicellular
otganisrns. However, it can be manipulated in the laboratory
readily and has a r~latively short doubling time, making it
amenable to many types of experiments. Furthermore, S.
pombe has a relatively small genome size, approximately
!.5 >: 107 bp in the haploid state, which is about three times
larger than that of Escherichia call Another useful future of
S. pombe is that it usmally exL,'ts as a haploid organism. This
ch~,'acteri~tie facilitates the creation and identification of
mutants. In addition, celIs can be mated to cotmruct strains
wilh desired genetic backgrounds and to study genes in
haploid as ~©I1 as diploid cells. Haploid% diploids, and
tetrads can be purified and used for subsequent genetic
analysis.
The budding yeast Saccharorayces cerevisiae has bex)n
studied extensively. Therefore, what makes S. pombe, at the
least, another attraetive model system for studying eukaty-
otic genes? Even though S. cerevisiae and S. pombe ate both
ase, omycetes, they are not very. closely related evolution-
arily. Protein sequence comparisons have indicated that S.
pombe is nearly as distain from S. cerevisiae as it is from
mammals (Russell, 1989). At the gene level, mammalian
inttons can be spliced properly in fission yeast (Kaufer et al.,
1985), and introns within S. pombe genes axe al~o appropri-
ately spliced when a component of the yeast spliceosome, U2
snRNA, is replaced hy a human equivalent (Shaster and
Gtlthrie, 1990). In ~ddifion, mammalian promoter and
poly(A) signals are fm~cti~nal in S. pombe but nr>t in S.
cerevisiae lRussell, 1989). The conservation of gene activity
between S. pvmbe and rn:~rnmals was clearly demonstrated
Ce~a~r for R~ological Research. College c,t Physician~
'Pre~erl ~dd~zs~: Dep~"tme~ ,~f Pediatrics,
59~4~16

c~'c2 Cell c2,,-Ie control llaman CDC2tls Lee ~d Nar~z 1P5S71
cd,:25 Cell c~cle control Haman CDC25Hu2 Nagata ¢t al. (1991)
~'¢el Cell c:~c]e ¢~ntrol Human WEEIHu Igamshi et aL { I§91 )
rad9 Rafliore~sis ~tan~ Mous~ homo!og~ Zhao a al. (!~2)
urn4 Uracil biosyn~esis M~e ho~log O~i etal. (1~)
by the functional compIementation of a number ofS. pombe
mutants by cognate genes from mammalian cells ~Tablc 1 ).
Schizomccharomyces pombe can therefore provide a novel
host system to investigate the structure, function, and expres-
sion of cukaryotic genes, especially those of mammalian
origin. Many molecular genetic techniques are now available
to pursue these goals.
General reviews concerning aspects of S. pombe cell and
molecular biology, as well as classical genetic approaches to
study this organism, have been publishe, d previously (Miteh-
ison, 1970; Gutz etal., 1974; Egel etal., 1980; Nasim etal.,
1989; Moreno etal., 1991). The goal of this minireview is to
provide an outline of the molecular teelmiques currently
available for manipulating S. pombe in the laboratory and to
draw attention to the usefulness and experimental tractability
of this relatively simple organism for studying eukaryotic
genes of both yeast and mammalian origin.
BIOLOGY OF S. POMBE
Schizosaccharomyces pombe is an ascomycete that di-
vides by binary fission. Hence, it is referred to as a "fission
],,east." Each cell is normally 3-4 I~m in diameter and 7-15
p,m in length. Its specific length corresponds well with its
growth phase in the cell cycle (Mitehison, 1970; Alfu et al.,
1993), which is similar to that of other eukaryotes, "and
includes the Gt, S, G2, and M (mitosis) phases (see Fig. 1 ).
However, S. pombe contains an extended G2 pha~ that carl
make up as much as 75% of the cycle (Mitchison, 1970). In
addition, the S. porabe nuclear envelope remains intact
throughout mitosis. Therefore, all transactions involving the
chromosomes during this phase occur intranuelearly. Fttr-
thermore, there is a delay between mitosis and tl~ complete
separation ofdaughter cells, resulting in the conclusion of Gt
before cellular division is finished. Thus, ceils initially
exidng mitosis contain the 2C content of DNA (Alfa etal.,
1993).
Schizosaccharomyces pombe grows optimally at approxi-
matel~' 3&C in the laboratory and has a doubling time of 2-4
hr, depending upon the genetic background of the cell and the
growth medium used for culturing. On agar medium, S.
pombe forms cream to tan, bubrous colonies fBarnett etaL,
1990).
The life ~,cle orS. pombe ~ haplontic, Le., ascxuaI ceils
are normally haploid IFig. IL Tbere are prirmmly t~o
Ol:-,posite mating t}pes, designated as h ' lheterolhalhc plusl
or h- (hetert-~hallic minus). The most commonly u~d strains
contain the h+s and h-s versions, respectively, of the mating
types. Mating can occur between heterothalli¢ h* and h-
cells or as a self-cross of homothallie strains (e.g., h%,
which possess both mating type characteristics (Gutz etal.,
1974). Mating can be induced by the stre~ of nutritional
depletion (Egel and Egel-Mitani, 1974). Both h÷ and h-
ceils secrete a diffusible mating pheromone that attracts cells
of the opposite mating" type (Egei and EgeI-Mitani, 1974;
Leupold, 1987). Fusion of the two cells results in the
formation of diploid zygotes. Spomlation is followed imme-
diately by meiosis to produce four haploid round or oval
ascospores that are 1-2 Ixm in diameter and enclosed within
an aseus. The ascus wall will disintegrate, and aseospores
will germinate "and eventually divide to foml haploid clones,
when the cells are refed appropriate nutrients (Leupold,
Ascospores
FIG. 1.
Zygote
Meiosis
~"~~S po r u lati o n
The Schizosacd',arom~ces pembe cell cycle.

MODEL FOR ~IOLECULAR STL~IES
2Ual
~a::Iff ct ~., 1994). P-th=t~r '~iI1
c~m~rcially (~ alpha fa:tor is fcrS. cere:isi:eL allowing
g~'a'~ ~st in G~ ~ ~e pa~uit of m~ny
cu~ently im~siMe to
T~e gentle linage ~oups were identified in S. ~mb¢
by ~lysis of recombination t?~uencies ~tween
{Kehli ct aL, 1977; Munz ct at., 1989). Coffes~ndingly,
~ c~omosomes have ~so ~n vis~ized ~ micros-
copy (Robinow, 1977). ~ c~omosomes we~ sub~-
quenfly found to ~ 5.7, 4.6, ~d 3.5 Mb (~gab~s) long,
~fively, ~ ~e~i~ by pulse-field gel elec~ophore-
sis (PFGE; Smi~ et al., 1988). A ~ysicM ~p of the S.
~echmmo~ h~ also ~en ~lis~d ~d it consists
of ~ Not I ~s~cfi~ e~ si~s p~nt wit~
ge~ (F~ el al., 1989). ~is m~es it ~ible to ~sign
ge~ of inte~st to s~ific res~fi~ e~yme-genem~
DNA ~nts by using Sou~em blott~g ~ related
techn~ues (S~lhem, 1975). More ~ 5~ S. pombe genes
Mve ~n idenfifi~ ~ f~, ~d ~e map ~ti~ of at l~t
2~ have ~n ~te~in~. A list of ~own gen~ and, if
~te~in~, ~ir c~omo~ map ~siti~s can ~ found
in Ko~i (1987), Mu~ et al. (1989), ~d Lennon ~d
~hrach (1~2).
STRAIN SOURCES
Schizosaccharomyces pombe can b~ found naturally in a
variety of habitats including arak marshes, molasses, cane
sugar, grapes, apples, palm wine, and Bantubac, r (Barnett et
al., 1990). However, most of the currently studied strains of
S. pombe have been derived from th~ same haploid wild-type
parents, 972h-, 975h÷, and 968h~ (Moreno et al., 1991).
These three strains arc isogenic and were obtained originally
by Leupold (1950) from a culture of S. pombe Lindner str.
liquefaciens (OsterwaldeO. Numerous mutant derivatives
have been created and successfully maintained. Collections
of S. pombe mutant swains have been amassed by and are
available from a variety of organizations, including ATCC
(Am~iean Ty~ Cultu~ Collection, 12301 Paridawn Drive,
Rockville, MD 20852-1776, USA), CBS (Cent~dbure~u
,,'oor ScMmmclcultums, P. O. Box 273, 3740 AG BAARN,
Th~ Neth~lands), and th~ National Collection of Yeast
Cultures (AFRC Institute of Food Research, Colncy Lane,
Norwich NR4 7UA, UK).
CONSTRUCTION OF MUTANT
$. POMBE STRAINS
The generation of a mutant S. pombe strain is normally the
first step toward the initial isolation of a specific gene and the
under~tanding of its biological function. A number of muta-
genie agems can be used to alter me genome ofS. porabe, and
some of these, as well as a procedme to enrich for mutant
c¢lis in a predormnmatly wild-type population, are described
below.
F~be, incl~/l~g h~d;,.,>.~la:~ir2, niuc~s a:iJ. e~yl rc~:h-
an~,ulfe~t~ ~ EMS L ~:~ ?,'-m~lhyl-?,"ni:ro-,~uni~os~g~m:i-
din~ (N~G). EMS is thz most comm:nly u~ed ~gent.
mmagens often used IMorcno ct a[., 19~1}. It ~ferentiMly
i~duces GC-t~AT transitions ~Sega, 1984) and is also
ca~ab~ of generating point mutations in yeast ~t~hon~al
DNA (Smolinska, 1987). In Mditi~n, the num~r of muta-
tions indued ~r su~.iving cell is high, m~ing
efficient at inducing genomic Mtemfiom (Mo~ et
1~1). ~ot~ols t~r EMS mutagenesis ~ ~ found in
Hayles etaL { 19~} and Moreno et at. (1~1). NTG is also a
ve~" efficient mutagen ~M~cno et af., 1~1) ~d is used
often to c~ate mutations. ~e ~¢hanism of mutation
induction by ~G is not clear, M~oa# it h~ ~en s~cu-
luted that this command reacts wi~ DNA to in~u~
d~g DNA replication IAdelberg et aL, 1~5). ~ols
d~fibing the um of NTG have ~en descried by Uemum
~ Y~a#~ (1984) and Moreno et al. (1~1). Me~ for
t~ u~ of nilus acid :~s a mutagen ~e pre~nted by Gu~
(1961) ~d Guglielminetti et al. (1967). ~e use of hydrox-
ylmine is de~fi~d by Guglielminetti et al. (1967).
Physical agents as mumgens
Ultraviolet (UV) light and ionizing radiation le.g.,
X-rays, ~/-rays. etc.) are useful for introducing mutations. It
is known that UV predominantly generates pyrimidine
dimers or pyrimidine-pyrimidone (6-4) photoproducts in
yeast DNA (Bimboim and Nasim, 1974). These lesions can
lead to mutations if not removed (Fabre, 1972; Genmer and
Wemer, 1975). A recent study by Zhao et al. (1994), using a
gene located on a plasmid as a target, suggested that thymi-
dine dimers, in particular, play an essential role in generating
mutations in S. porabe. Ionizing radiation can induce several
lesions, including DNA base damage, but single- and dou-
ble-strand DNA breaks are primarily formed and can also
lead to mutation if not properly repaired (Bomham and
Mitchel, 1991). However, relative to EMS, radiation, in
getmtal, is not an efficient mutagenizing agent and is not used
as frequently as chemicals to alter the S. pombe genome.
Enriched selection qf mutants
Becaus~ induced or especially spontaneous mutatio~s
aris¢ with low frequency, attempts were made to develop
varies methods for the "enriched selection" of fission yeast
mutants. Methods simJk, r in principle to the pe~ieillin tech-
nique for selecting auxotrophic mutants in bacteria, as
des~ibed in the early 1960s (Gorini and Kaufman, 1960),
have been applied to S. pombe. This strategy involves the
of agents that eliminate or 6gnificantiy inhibit the growth of
nonmutated, actively dw~cting cell% while spanng mutated,
nondi~iding cells. 2-D~,ox.~gluconase 12-DG) is tree such
chemical agent and ~t i~ a~ed as a cell division inhibitor.
2-DG inhibits phosphog i acorn atase and ~ha~ blocks cell wall
bio~,nthesi~. Ac:c, cl5 db. ,ding 5. p,~mbe celis, Lrcated wiLh

ZILXO ,~ND LIEt3ERM~N
~rctreated vvifia 2-DG ~ill cnh~¢e ~: s~l=ctl~n { Fere~.ez
el.. 1975; McAtE=)anJ KiI~ey, 1976; SiliCa ~J Far-
er.ezy, 197S1. Thi~ method h~; be2n u:ed ~<ucce~. fulI:, for
and also au~o:rop~s tMe~met, 1985bL
Ino~tol, a vi~in that is ~sentiM for S. Fombe cell
~owth, is mno~er agent us~ for the enriched selection
mut=t ~pulatio~ (Megnet, I ~l. On minimal ag~ devoid
of i~sitol, growing pmtetrophic cells will die d~ to the lack
of ~is vitamin. Nongrowing mutant cells, however, are
e~entially un~u~d dung Nis prc~s ~d ¢~ ~ recov-
e~d by simply adding inositol ~10 days later.
N~edures c~ ~ us~ to enrich for mut~ts ~sing s~nta-
neously or t~se i~uc~ either by chemical or physicM
agents (Megnet, 19~).
MANIPULATION OF S. POMBE DNA
DNA extraction
In general, protocols used for preparing S. cerevisiae
DNA can be readily adapted for S. porabe. Methods for
purifying S. pombe genomic DNA include large-scale
(Durkacz et al., 1985) and mini-scale (Hoffman and Win-
ston, 1987; Rose et al., 1990) preparation procedures. It is
difficult to isolate large amounts of plasmid DNA directly
from S. pombe because of the low copy numbers present
within cells. Plasmids harbored in S. pombe are usually
recovered by transforming purified total DNA into E. coli
and selecting bacterial cells that have received plasmid
(Hoffman and Winston, 1987: Rose etal., 1990; Moreno et
al., 1991). In this way, S. pombe plasmids can be readily
amplified and purified using procedures well established tbr
E. coli (Ausubel et al., 1994). However, transformation of
total DNA into E. coli often results in a low efficiency of
plasmid recovery, perhaps due to unidentified inhibitory
factor(s) in the DNA preparation (Rose, 1987). To circum-
vent this problem, modified versions of the Hoffman and
Winston (1987) protocol were developed by Robzyk and
Kassir (1992) for small-scale preparations and by Zlmo and
Lu (1995) for larger yields. Using these procedures, plasmid
DNA with presumably le~ inhibitors can be obtained and
used to achieve higher transformation effieiencies. How-
ever, a greater problem is the tendency of $. pombe to
multimerize and rearrange plasmids. This problem is more
difficult to solve, but the bacterial swain used for transforma-
tion can influence the efficiency of plasmid recovery (Alia et
aL, 1993). In addition, the recovery of plasmid DNA from S.
pombe by transformation into E. coli is significantly im-
proved by using electroporation rather than other methods of
bacterial transformation.
Methods for DNA tran~Jbrmarion
Variotm methcxt~ are a~ailable for the introduction of DNA
it.to S. porabe. These procedures inclnde the ttse of lithium
acetate (Ito et aL. 1983; OkazaM et aL, 19901 or lithium
chloride (Broker, 19~i7), lhe sphereplast methtxi (Beth arm
~er.tice, If~)2). ~ e~ly ~r~a~0n cx~Vmzn~a Fro-
deced effiN~zi~s of approxima~ely 5 '.: 10
~sIk,~ka'gg of DNA. Later, ~ elfi~e~cy of 7.
~fo~anka~g of DNA w~ obtained ~i~g a
of ~e sph~repl~t m=lk~5 e6ginally dzscfi~d by Beach a~d
Nurse 119811. ~is new pr~ed~ inelud~ the use of the
cationic ~some-fo~ing r~gent Li~fecan/GIBCO/B~
Cat# 18292011). ~is chemicN fo~ cemplexes with
~d cell membr~es, which ~sumably enh~e the up~e
of DNA (Allshi~, 1990). A simil~ t~nsfo~ation effi-
ciency w~s ~so achieved by ~ing ~ improvod lithium
acetic meth~ (Oka~ et eL, 1~). Conventionally,
freshly p~ed comNtent cells ~e ~de I~r tmsfo~a-
tion. However, it was ~cently found that comNtent S.
~e cells, ~ed using t~ spheroplast meth~, can
stered fm~n forat l~t 3 monks without signifie~t loss of
tr~st~ation e~aciency (~aoetal., 1~3). S. pom~cells
~ comNtent by a ~r~ed~e using li~ium acetate can
al~ ~ c~oprese~ed IBr~er, 1~31. ElectroCution is,
however, ~e quickest ~d ~siest meth~ for high-efficiency
t~sfo~afion and may well be the pmt~ol of choice in
~st la~mtoNes utilizing S. pombe.
FISSION YEAST VECTORS
General features
Typical S. porabe cloning vectors are capable of "'shut-
tling" between yeast and bacteria. They consist of an auton-
omous replication sequence (ars), a yeast selectable genetic
marker and unique restriction sites for cloning. In addition, a
bacterial origin of replication (ori) and a selection ~ker for
bacteria (i.e., usually encoding ampieillin or tetracycline
resistance) are Mso part of the vector. A stabilizing element
(stb), which is sometimes added to the vector, enhances the
stability of the plasmid within transformants (Moreno et al..
1991). Depending upon the specific purpose, the cloning
plasmids can be classified as "general cloning vectors,"
vectors for constructing gene banks, or expr~sion vectors
(Russell, 1989). However, this classification is somewhat
arbiwary since, for example, vectors used for subeloning and
for constructing gene banks are essentially interehangeal~le.
Markers for selection in 3"east
It is important to be able to select S. pombe cells that have
received vector DNA. For this Ixtrpose, most vectors contain
a genetic marker that would confer a growth advantage uixm
transfomaanls, relative to cells that have not received plus-
mid. Probably the most widely used selectable rrmrker
systems involve genes that complement S. porabe mutations
which prevent growth on medium devoid of either leueine
(i.e., leul-32, etc.), be~tuie of the lack of 3-isoprop]/lmalate
dehydrogenase, or uracil (i.e., ura4.204, ura4-Dr, ura4-
D18, ttc.), as a result of the inactivity of orotidine-5'-
phosphate decarboxylase (tbr review, see Russell, 1989).
Both the S. pombe teal and the S. certvisiae LEU2 genes
complement the deficiency in leul- fission yeast cells. The
S. pombe ura4 and S. cere~.tsiae URAA genes can comple-
ment the S. pombe uro¢- growth detect. Ho~,'e',cr, the 5".

~:e ~ft~n req~r~fl t~ ~c~v~ f~I! cempl~m~n~cn ~d gc~d
In ~d~i~n to ~ ~puI~ ~Iec~on s~em~, m~y
ethers ha~e ~e~n d~vis~d. Complementafion of S.
ural (S~<a~chi ~d Yam~o{o, 19~2). hi~ (Burke ~d
Gould, 19~}, and h~ (A~lin~o etal., 1~3) cell~ wi~
• e co~nding fission ~east wtld-~ genes, ~ ~'eil ~
~c6-7~M mu~t cots ~5~ ~e cl~ suppressor ~NA gone
sup3-5 (~, 1987), have ~en d~cfi~d. Vectom that m~e
use of ~g-r~is~ce m~kem have Mso ~en u~ for
selecfion of S. ppmbe w~fo~ants. ~is cl~s of m~ke~
incl~e the ~' gone of ~ns~son Tn~3 for seleefi~ of
~sist~ce to ~e =tibiotie ~18 (S~M et M., 19~), ~d~e
BSD gone of~pergill~ terreus for ~lecfion of ~sist~ce to
the fungici~ bl~ticidin S (Kimum etal., 1~). However,
w~ch ever selectable mmker syaem is u~d, ~re must ~ a
low genomie mve~ion fr~y to ~ able to det~t ~e
tmsfo~ation events. Cells containing deleti~s ofge~c
ve~ions of exogenous genes, if coffes~ng e~omo~l
genes exist, ~ ~st suited for ~em stud,s, ~ ~ey have ~e
low~t reve~ion freque~y a~ mud not to undergo gen~
conversion even~ if.e, ~n-reciproeM exch~ge of DNAL
Vectors for library construction and subeloning
When choosing a plasmid to construct a gone bank or to
subelone, a vector that is stable in S. porabe and can carry a
relatively large DNA fi'agment should be selected. The
vector systems developed by Wright and co-workers (1986),
a prototype being pWHS, are particularly well suited for
cloning. Insertions of DNA fragments into the kcI represser
gone within pWH5 will knock out suppression of the tetra-
eyeline resistance gone (under control of the k PR promoter)
~so present on the plasmid. Consequently, only bacterial
colonies transformed by pla.smids containing an insert will be
tetracycline resistant. However, the presence of a S. core.
visiae 2p, element in this vector appears to lead to frequent
rearrangements. Recently, a new vector (peNS) with similar
features, except for the presence of a S. porabe arm in place
of the S. cerevisiae 2p, and a suppressed transposon-derived
neomycin resistance gone instead of the regulmed tetracy-
cline-resistance gone, has been described tbr use with S.
pombe (Weilguny et al., 1991 ). Another series of plasmids
(Barbetetal., 1992), derived from pUC 19, and containing S.
pombe arm and the E. coli lacZ gone for blue-white screen-
ing to detect the presence of inserts, has also been developed.
In addition, Cottarel and co-wafl~ers (1993) have developed
a set of multicopy plasmids (pSPI, pSP2) that 'also contain S.
porabe arsl.
Plasmids ealmbte of supporting the maintenance and rep-
lication of several hundred kilobase pairs of DNA, such
the yeast artifi~al chromosome (YAC) vectoes for S. cere-
visiae (Burke et t~l., I987L have, in addition, been devel-
oped for S. pombe tHahnenberger etal., 1989; Allshire,
i990). Ordered YAC~ PI~ and cosmid clones, bearing large
fragments of the S. pombe scheme, have been generated by
two independent genome studies, conducted at the Imperial
C:mcer R~,earch Fund in London (Hohetsel etal., 1993;
N~' York togcth:r
~e~e m; vM~ble
inter~t.
Expression vectors and other specialized ptasraids
Kxi~ression vectors have also been develo~d to mediate
transcription of cDNAs of interest by inclusion of promoter
sequences in plasmid~. For example, the S. pombe adh
(alcohol dehydroge, ase~ sere prom,~ter has been used. In
addition, unlike for the yeast S. cerevisiae, promoters from
many different organisms are also capable of driving tran-
scription in S. p~mhe. The SV40 early promoter is active in
S. pombe and has been used in several fission yeast vectors,
ineludingpSM2andpDB248(KauferetaL, 1985;Moreno et
aL, 1991). This promoter mediates transcription constitu-
tively at a relatively low level, and is about 500-fold less
active than the adh gone promoter (Forsburg, 1993). Even
the tomato nia gone promoter functions in S. pombe and a
vector making use of this regulator), region has been con-
structed (Truong etal.. 1992). Interestingly, the human
immunodefieiency v~ru.~ long terminal repeat promoter
(Toyama et al., 1992), tile hunmn chorionic gonadotropin
alpha gone promoter, and human cytomegalovims promoters
(Toyama and Okayama, 1990) are extremely active in S.
pombe. Several of these promoters could potentially b~ well
suited for expressing human genes in fission yeast, especially
when high levels of transcription may be important to
achieve cross-species biological activity.
Inducible promoters have also been described for S.
pombe vector systems. For example, the promoter for the
fructose bisphosphatase gone is capable of driving transcrip-
tion of S. pombe genes in a controllable fashion (Hoffman
and Winston, 19891. cDNAs fused to this promoter can be
induced by glucose repression over a 100-fold range. This
allows tight control of gone expression levels by the manip-
ulation of growth conditions. However, the drawback of this
system is the very slow growth of S. pombe on glycerol. A
tetrucyeline-inducible promoter, which is a derivative of the
cauliflower mosaic virus 35S gone, was also used for gone
expression studies in S. pombe (Faryar and Gatz, 1992).
Likewise, a glucocorticoid-respoosive promoter from the rat
glueoeoaieoid receptor gone has been used for an inducible
promoter system in S. pombe (Heard etaL, 1990). However,
probably the most popular vectors currently used for regu-
lat~l expression of cDNAs in S. pombe are t~ pREP/pRIP
series of plasmids (B~.~i e2 ~I., 1993; Maundrell, 1993). They
contain the thiamine-repressible nmtl gone promoter from S.
pombe. The pREP plasmid and derivatives replicate extra-
chromo~omally, whereas the pRIP plaxmid lacks S. pombe
arm and therefore tend~ to integrate into the chromosome.
Systematic modification of the nmtl promoter region in
pREP has resulted in ~he generation era series of derivatives
that together provide :~ aide range of regulated expression
levels for a DNA sequence of interest. Although repression
in this s~,stem is xtct c,,~plcIe, m~mduced baseline levels of
expression are ~e~ k,,~

ger.c~e of S. ~-~e at a s~ecitic si:~. Keer.~y ~d Bceke
(I~4) b~va ~vcIwed vact~ f,~r ~-~e~ i~Ik, n via
k~m~.,~a~ recombination m:o lcal ~=d ura4 gone regien~.
MecMnisms that ~iaze ~get~ integration e~en~, ~d
• eir useNIne~. ~e ad&essN ~elow in
~spla:e~nt.
N¢¢ ~1 veeto~ for use in & p~e se~'e to faei~ the
cloning ~d ~pre~i~n of genes. Some have mo~ s~ciN-
iz~ functions. For exmp~, a shuttle v~t~
to d~ect mamge~sis in S. po~ h~ ~n de~d
a aL, 19~1. ~is v~tar, ~RI, ~plieat~
~ E. cofi cells ~ ¢~es ~n E. coli ~NA su~p~ssor
ge~e ~ the mutagen t~get. By using ~g
o~ or induced mu~ons of ~ supF ge~ gene~d in S.
pombe ¢~ ~ deteet~ ~r in~uc~en ~t~ a ~mbi~
bac~a~pl~mid K~IFKY241 re~er system (~
aal., 1~2), by sel~g fornNi~ie~id~si~tbactefiN
calls ~or by ~ning for wNte coloNes on 5-bmm~
cMom-3-indolyl-~-D-gaNctopy~
~-~iog~act~yr~side (I~) ~ ag~ (i.e., the I~Z-
phenot~).
MOLECULAR CLONING OF
S. POMBE GENES
Several strategies used routinely for the isolation of S.
pombe genes are described below. Metho~ employed to
construct S. pombe genomic DNA libraries (Beach et al.,
1982; Wright et al., 1986) or eDNA libraries (Fikes et al.,
1990; Olesen et al., 1991) have been described previously.
In addition, cloning by nucleic acid hybridization and poly-
merase chain reaction (PCR) are also possible, but are not
unique to S. pombe and will not be addressed in this section.
Cloning by functional complementation
Molecular cloning by functional complementation is the
mo~ lmpular method for isolating S. pombe genes. In brief,
a genomic or eDNA library is introduced into $. pombe cells
containing a mutation in a gone whose wiki-type
is to be isolated. Traasformaals receiving plasmid are
lectad by viflue of a gea~ on the library vector that provides a
growth advantage. Cells receiving the geae of interest, and
therefore having a rescued murat phenotype, c~n eilber be
sel~-~d simullaneonsly with selection for receipt of pl~mid
or tramformant populations can be screened at a later date for
the presence of the gene of interest and, consequently, a
complanented mutant txhenotype.
Many features of S. pombe make it amenable to the
functional complementation approach for gene cloning. The
genome size of ~his organism is relatively small so that a
manageable number of transformants can be generated and
soreemxl to identify a gene of interest successfully. Because
the $. pombe haploid genome is 1.5 × I ~ kbp long, approx-
irrmtely 1,500 plasm~ds containing 1O-kbp inserts v, ould
theoreticalb represent one librat)' of DNA. However, for
screening purposes, at least three to tour timeg that number
~hould be tesled to ensure a high probability of obtaining
~St o:ic sro~~ in ~= ak~nce of 5elec~e gre~N (Rus~II,
19891. ~s
~Ween loss of pI~m!d ~d loss of~ phenog;ge ~c-:iated
wi~ a clon~ gent, ruling out t~ ~;~ibility of isNating and
~g gentle reverts. Wi~ lib~ m~e in rela-
tively l~ge ~ectom, such as pDB248, them have ~en
~ol~ed incidents of re~ge~n~ o~ed in pl~mi~
rec~ve~ ~ E. coil ~eyer et aL, 1986; H.B.L. =d Y.Z.,
~publis~fl da~l. However, ~c u~ of libmes ~ in
relatively s~l venom, s~h ~ pUR ( B~t el al., I ~2), in
c~binatian wi~ r~oveD" in E. coil s~in J~26 {a recBC-
s~), f~ ex~ple, e= vi~ly climate ~e ~tentiM
~gemen~ ~t ~ ~c~ (A~ a al., ! 985; ~N a al.,
1~3). ~hegchia coil HB 101, a re~ - recBC* s~in, has
M~ ~n u~d succe~lly for pl~mid recove~ (Ok~i
al., IN). ~e m in,t, active DNA fmg~nt is i~lated,
sub~nt stu~es, m~ng u~ of ~ ~nspl~ement
techniques (~ ~tion on Gone ~nspl~e~nt, ~low),
whe~by the No~ gone mplae~ i~ homolog~s counter-
p~ in ~e germ, c~ confi~ ~at t~ isolated gone is the
wiM-~ vemion of ~ altered Mlele.
Alternatively, cr~s-sNcies complemenmfion strategies
c~ld ~ K~d to cloue S. ~e genes. Schizoxacc~romy-
cespo~e urn1 ~ ~o3 were cloud by funcfio~ comple-
menmtion of co~e~dMg g. coil mumn~ (Ya~om e~
al., 1981; N~sM ~ Ym~to, 19~). Saceharo~ees
cerevisiae h~
p~ ge~. Ge~ enc~ing alc~ol dehydrogen~ (Rus-
sell ~ HMI, 1983), ~om-#~ate isomer~ (Rus~ll,
1~5), ~ ~e C&42p ~ase (Miller and Johnson, i~)
from & ~mbe have, for ex~ple, Men cloud by comple-
~n~tion of eo~es~n~ng S. cer~,isiae mutm~. The
tenfiM ~blem with ~ing ~is m~ is that ~c~pfion of
S. p~be ge~s in $. cerevisi~ is usu~ly ~M ~d
incident (Ru~ll, 1983, 1985). A morn ~fi~s pr~lem
¢o~e~ ~e p~v~e of in~ons wi~ S. ~e genes
that Lack ~liee con~us ~ne~s ~ogni~ble by S.
eer~isi~e (Rus~ll, 1989). E~Nent ~d ~eu~e s#ic~g
wouM ~ ~ to nerve g~ ~p¢~sion ~d ~emfore
~ co~l~nmfion. To c~mvent
lores, S. p~ c~A lib--, driven by a S. eerev~iae
pm~r, have ~y ~n ~et~ ~ ¢~ m i~lme
~ fi~ion ye~ ge~s by reNuing mu~t pMno~s in
b~ing y~t ~es
el., 1~1).
ANALYSES OF A CLONED GENE BY
MUTAGENESIS AND TRANSPLACEMENT
Once a gene is isolated on a plasmid, aside from the
deterraiaation of its DNA sequence/Maxim and Gilbert,
1977; Sa~ger et al.. I977"), functional domains and biologi-
cal actMty can be ch,~'a(:lenzed asing a variety of mutagcn-
esis technklues, either alone or in concert with germ trans-
placement.

S. FI2MBE. A .'~IODEL FOR ~IOLECUL.~R S'TEDIES
:qi.~
=~z~ f~n~on. If a cDNA
f~m containing a geze of interest is cloned, at l~at one
of ~verM tech~ques mast
pr~i~ lc~fioa of ~e gene. Fmgment~ of
DNA c~ ~ su~lo~ed ~ ~d in vivo for acfivib, after
MLng ~sfm~ imo ~e appropriate murat ~lls, t~by
I~ali~ng g¢~ ~on to a subfmg~nt of
DNA isolmed. As ~
~mly in~ed into ~, ge~mic DNA
~ ~ co~l~ %5~ 1~ ~ retenfi~ of ~on, a~n
~fiMng ~gions ¢mc~ for acfi~ty =d m~t l~ely ~siding
wi~M ~e ~ of int~st (~e~ et M., 19~; Snyder a al.,
1986; Huis~ a al., 1987).
Mmy t~h~qu~ m avMlable to ~tcr ge~s in vitro, ~ a
st~ tow~ ~ ~mb~s~nt of s~cmwd~fi~ ~lafion-
ships by co,lining s~cific alterations
~fion of ~fivib,. S~veml of ~ ~,#es co~nly u~ to
alter a relmi~ly smMl, def~ regi~ of a ge~
fi~d in Ausu~l et al.
quences left intact ~r sy~emafi¢ ~g~fion wi~ exonu-
cl~s, ~ ~n~ ~ming ~ of a ~ of in~r~t,
~ ~ ~ed for ~tivity
back~unds.
P~mially, genes ~uM also ~ mumgeMz~ in vivo,
whil~ ~iding in ~
~fiMd f~ using synt~tic oligonucleoti~s, ~ sho~ as 20
bp, to ~ffo~ site-d~t~ m~e~sis,
buffing y~t S. cerevisMe. ~se stall DNA ~nts
haw ~n ~nsfo~ into S. cereviMae, ~d inse~on
muttons in g~o~c regions h~dog~s to ~ tmnsfo~-
ins DNA ~v¢ su~u~tly ~¢n i~nfified (M~h~ et
al., l~g). AI~u# ~is has not yet ~n ~ffo~ in
fimion y~, i~ ~¢~
im~ to do ~ s~ in S. po~e.
Gene transplacement
Another powerful aHxoach to analyze g¢ne function in
yeast involves the creation of dismp6on mmants tagged with
a marker that can be used for ~leclion (Roth~in, 1983;
Stmhl, 1983). "l'his rr~thod consists oft~ physical intetra!m.
tion of a clomxi germ in vitro and the replacememt of the
inherent cellular g,ne with tim modifmd version (i.e., trans-
pl~men0. A ramkxn piece of DNA er ideally a selectable
rrmrker such as S. porabe leul or ura4 (Grimm et al., 1988),
or the corr~pom~ng S. cerevixiae functionalcognat~ LEU2
or URA3 (Beach and Nur~, 1981; Los~on and Lacro~te,
1983), Call l~ il~rted within a gone. However, if ore ofth~
aforementiomxl markers is used, the S. pombe genes are
preferr~ be.cau.~ the lmdding yeast germs are expressed
~.aldy in f'~fion yeast and would, therefore, not provide a
strong s~lection for an insert present as a single copy (see
section, Matker~ foe selection in yeaxt). Iftl~ goal is to create
a true ~null" mutation, part or all of the open re~ing frame of
the gone of interest can be ~leted Mfore the interscuing
piece of DNA is in_~z~al. However, r¢gatdles~
r.c,t s~I~c~b'~c on i~ c~wa. f~nhz~c, rc. hh~ ~-ker ~-~uld tag
• ~ gen~ of ~tere~t so ti~at it could t~ ~te¢~d e~ily
progeny of genetic cro~se~, a usefal fea~re for subsequent
studies ~volving strain con~waction.
DNA con~ng an autonomous replica~on ~quence
(ars) t~ to replicate ind¢~ndently of ~c S.
c~mosomes. When DNA d~void of ars is ~ into
g. pombe, the DNA cannot rcpli~te unle~ it inte~tes into
• e genoa, htegmtion can ~xear mdomly, md m sites tMt
~ no signifi~nt homulogy to t~ exoge~us, ~o~ing
DNA. Howev~, ~e DNA ~mn also ~ ~et~, via ho~l-
ogous ~combimtion, to a genomic re#on tMt h~
in commn. ~ latter integration e~ents, ~ well ~ the
p~ie~ ge~c s~ctures generate, ~ su~ed by
Ro~mM (1~1). S~veml events ~¢ ob~'ed ~ter ~for-
m~on ~ a ~cul~ pl~mid, devoid ofar, md c~tMning
~ a gone of interest (altered in vigo if ap~p~te) =d a
~l~tabM m~ homologous to gen~ l~amd in a chromo-
rome. A s~# reciprocal exchmge ~tween ~ ~l~mble
m~er or the gone of interest, and a c~es~nding site in
germ, will r~ult in the intention of~e fl~mid adj~ent
to ~ genomic site having s~es in commn. ~-
times, multiple tandem integrations of ~ plmmid ~
~m~fively, tMre will ~ a replacement of ~e ~i~table
m~ in ~ g~no~ by only the m~er ~ the plasmid,
probably ~ia gone conversion or a double crossover. If t~
pl~d is inifiMly line~zed with a r~ct~n enzyme at a
sire ~ ~ clon~ yeast DNA a~acent to t~ gone of ~temst,
~fom ~sfo~ng ~lls, the same even~ c~ ~cur, but the
relative ~encies will differ. A signific~tly l~ger pro~r-
fion of inm~t~ns will ~cur at the site of~e ge~ ofint~st
in t~ genome, ~d the overall efficiency of ~o~ation
will inc~ d~aticMly. ~e ~sition of t~ cut in t~
pl~mid ~d ~ length of s~nces homlogom to t~
g~me will aff~t ~e frequency of ~c inte~ti~ events,
M~ugh ~owl~ge of these p~ete~ will not Mways
~t a g~ ~iction of tM ~sfomtion out~.
S~m bl~ ~flyses (Sout~m, 1975) cm ~ u~ to
~ce~ ~ namm of the integration
H~s intention events ~ ~c~ at a hi~
q~y ~ $. ~. Tmnsfo~ c~ ~ ~ for ~is
~ of inm~on or. alt~ati~ely, a s~ial v~tor-host
s~ ~v~ by G~len et al. (1~3) ~ ~ ~ to
~l~t ~y for such events. Howev~, regals of
w~r~ ~eefion system is u~d, ~ ~pl~nt by
homI~s ~ombin~iun c~ ~ ~comgefl if li~
~r ~ e~l~ DNA is u~d ~ ~ ~le-s~
DNA e~, ~nding to tM ~t~on si~ of im~t,
~ ~ ~ ~e exogenous DNA u~ for ~f~ti~
~R~te~, 1~1). In ~e ye~t S. cer~i~i~, ~ v~t ~r-
i~ of in~n e~en~ ~cur at sit~ ~1~o~ to ~e
~co~g pi~e of DNA ~Ro~stein, I~1). For S.
~l~om ~ombina6on e~en~ c~ M less f~m even
w~n ~ ~ e~ of tr~sfo~mg DNA ~ ~mologous to
c~~ DNA regions. G~ ~d Kohli 119~
• at in~on of the ura4 gem into a co~s~ing
~e mu~t ~cu~ed ~ia homologom ~imfion,
~sL 67% of ~ time. Gral:¢~ e~ ul. (I~3) ~zed
~0~22
