NYSA CTR 1
Chapter 40 Use of Predesigned Plasmids To Study Deletions: Strategies for Dealing with a
Abstract
This article is now in press in DRA Replication and Muta~en~sis, a volu~e
Fields
- Date Loaded
- 11 Jan 2006
- Box
- 0001
Document Images
This article is now in press in DRA Replication and Muta~en~sis, a volu~e
of invited contributions to a conference held last ~ove~ber on F1arco Island,FLA.
Chapter 40
Use of Predesigned Plasmids To Study
Deletions: Strategies for Dealing with a
Complex Problem
Elias Balbinde~"
Although the existence of large genetic r~-
arrangements such as deletions, duplica-
tlons, inversions, translocations, etc., has
been known for close to 50 years, the mech-
anisms that bring them about are not yet
understood. Interest in their study has been
increasing in recent Feat's since genetic rear-
rangements in both procaryotes and curacy-
• ores are at the base of important blological
processes (7, 42) and also constitute a major
class of dlsease-related genetic events (59,
57). The complexity of eucaryo¢ic systems
has made it difficult to study genetic rear-
rangements at the molecular level, iv~ost of
what we know today comes from studies
using procaryotic systems. These have iden-
tified some of the important parameters in
rearrangement formation and also brought
about the realization that the mechanisms
responsible for them are exceedingly com-
plex. Major genetic rearrangements can oc-
cur either as the result of the movdment of
transposable elements (transposition; 44) or
naturally from the resolution of transient
.~'1~ ,~alblndee • Department of B|ochem~stry.
B|ophys~cs and Generics. Univcrslty of" C.olo~do
Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80262.
secondary structures formed in the course of
DNA metabolism (1, 17, 22, 43). We are
concerned exclusively with the latter.
Deletions are the most extensively stud-
ied rearrangements, and most of them are
explained by misalignment mutagenesis
models. These are extensions of the model
advanced by Streisinge~ et el. to explain the
origin,of fr~eshift mutatio~ (SD and .~
postu,ate important roles fff~direct and in-
ver~ed repeats. These models are based on
exte~ive sequencing of deletion mutations
and propose either that deletions take place
between direct termin~ repeats and can be
facilitated by the presence of int~'ening
inverted repeats (palindromes) (1), or they
can occur at the end of palindromes ia
absence of direct end repeats (22, 43). Pal-
indromes are believed to stabilize mis~ign-
ments resulting from slippage ~f {ra~iendy
single-stmnded regions during DNA replica-
.tion (1, 22, 43). Tmnsposon excision k a
deletion event t~ing place between dkect
repeats at the end
is considerable support for these m~els (1.
I1, 17, 24, 27, 37, 45, 50, 55)) and they
explain most of the deletions reported to
date. A certain number of deletions can be
-t
40000212
