NYSA CTR 1
MUTGEN 00_02 Multiple pathways of deletion formation in Escherichia coli Elias Balbinder
Abstract
Department of Biochemi.~try, Biophysics and Genetics and Colorado Cancer Center, Univ.ershy of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 East 9thAvenue, P.O.
Fields
- Named Organization
- American Cancer Society
- National Science Foundation
- Singer
- University of Colorado
- Named Person
- Nagel, Rosa
- Smith, Gerald R.
- Date Loaded
- 11 Jan 2006
- Box
- 0001
Document Images
© I$~3 F_~e~=r S~i=nc~ Ik~bI~h~rs B.V. All ri~.ht~ re.fred 0165-1218193/$~D&0~
• MUTGEN 00~02
Multiple pathways of deletion formation in Escherichia coli
Elias Balbinder
Department of Biochemi.~try, Biophysics and Genetics and Colorado Cancer Center, Univ.ershy of
Colorado Health Sciences Center,
4200 East 9thAvenue, P.O. Box B 121, Denver, CO 80262, USA
(Received 24 June 1992)
(Revision received 29 December 1992)
(Accepted 11 January 1~93)
Keyword~: Deletions; Palindromes; SOS repair; Tnl0 excision; RecBC; Mutant selection for deletion
enhancement
We are investigating the mechanisms for deletion formation through the use of mutants which
alter
deletion frequency together with well characterized systems for deletion detection. We report here
on
three mutations which were isolated for their ability to stimulate deletions in plasmid pMC874 (dli
mutations). The mutation rec-2251 (formerly known as dlil) is a new allele of recBCD, a group of
genes
coding for the polypeptide components of the major recombination enzyme complex in E. coli; the
second one, dli2 may be a new allele of uvrD, which codes for DNA heliease lI; and the third one,
dli3,
has the phenotype of a mismatch repair mutation. Here we compare the effects of mutations in
SOS-repair genes to those of the dli mutations on three different deletion events: (a) the deletion
of
short (60-100-bp) palindromic and non-palindromic inserts in derivatives of plasmid pBR325; (b)
larger
(600-800-bp) deletions in plasmid pMC874; and (e) the excision of the Tnl0 transposon from chromoso-
mal sites. Our results indicate that some form of SOS processing stimulates the loss of palindromes
but
not non-palindromes in plasmid pBR325 derivatives, and that RecA is necessary for UV-induced
excision of Tnl0 but this event is inhibited by UmuCD or its homolog MueAB. Each of the dli
mutations
showed unique effects on different classes of deletions. Mutation rec-2251 stimulated specifically
deletions in pMC874 but had no effect on the deletion of non-palindromes in pBR325, and reduced the
incidence of the other deletion events tested including loss of palindromic inserts in pBR325 as
well as
Tnl0 excision. Mutation dli2, on the other hand, stimulated all deletions tested to varying extents,
while
dli3 did not affect markedly deletion formation in pBR325 plasmids but had a large stimulatory
effect on
both deletions in plasmid pMC874 and Tnl0 excision. These results reveal that (a) some SOS-repair
functions participate in deletion formation, (b) mutations selected for altering the incidence of
one class
of deletions may have totally different effects on other deletion events, and (e) the differences in
mutant
Correspondence: Dr. Elias Balbinder, Department of Bio-
chemistry, Biophysics and Genetics and Colorado Cancer
Center, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200
East 9th Avenue, P.O. Box B 121, Denver, CO 80262, LISA.
40000107

194
behavior may result in part from the ability of some pathways to discriminate among different
deletion
intermediates such as hairpins or cruciforms formed by palindromic sequences vs. transient seconday
structures stabilized by direct repeats flanldng non-palindromic sequences.
Although the e~stence of large genetic alter-
ations such as deletions, duplications, inversions,
translocations, etc. has been known for more than
fifty years, interest in their study has increased
over the last decade because of their role in
cancer and genetic disease (Callahan and Camp-
bell, 1989; DeKlein, 1987; Yunis, 1986). These
alterations are generally considered to arise by
poorly defined processes akin to "illegitimate re-
combination" (Franklin, 1967), meaning events
which differ from homologous recombination in
not requiring extensive genetic homology or recA
function. It is clear today that the situation is
much more complex, and that genetic rearrange-
ments can arise through a variety of mechanisms,
none of which are yet well understood.
Spontaneous deletions in prokaryotie replicons
apparently can occur either through the resolu-
tion of unstable transient intermediates formed
in the normal course of DNA metabolism (AI-
bertini et al., 1982; Ripley and Glickman, 1983),
from intermoleeular recombination events (Di-
anov etal., 1991; Mazin et al., 1991; Singer and
Westlye, 1988), or as the result of errors in the
movement of transposable elements (Kleckner et
al., 1979). Deletions of the first two classes occur
predominantly between direct repeats, which are
often flanking inverted repeats (palindromes). In
this case, it has been proposed that deletions
result from the resolution of unstable structural
intermediates such as hairpins or erueiforms (Al-
bertini et al., 1982; Balbinder et al., 1989; Das-
Gupta etal., 1987; Foster et al,, 198l; Gliekman
and Ripley, 1984; Jones et al., 1982; Meulien et
al., 1981; Ripley and Glickrnan, 1983; Singer and
Westlye, 1988; Weston-Hafer and Berg, 1989,
1991). Cruciform structures in plasmids have ac-
tually been shown to exist in rive (Zheng et al.,
1991), but other mispaired intermediates have
proven difficult to demonstrate. The misalign-
ment mutagenesis model (Albertini et al., 1982;
Glic'kman and Ripley, 1984) proposes that tran-
sient deletion intermediates can form on single-
stranded stretches of DNA as the result of slip-
page during replication and that these intermedi-
ates are resolved through several mechanisms,
namely: (a) recombination by enzyme systems
promoting rearrangements at sequence repeats;
(b) misreplication across the base of misaligned
secondary structures; and (c) nudease excision of
the transient intermediate. There is some evi-
dence for (a) and (b) above (Dianov et al., 1991;
Mazin etal., 1991; Singer and Westlye, 1988;
Brunier et al., 1988) but not for (e). It is possible
that all three mechanisms may participate in the
formation of different, or even the same, deletion
events. Another model accounts for deletions
generated by double-stranded DNA breaks be-
tween direct repeats. This postulates that exonu-
dease processing of these breaks produces
single-stranded tails, and the eventual matching
of short repeats within the latter followed by
ligation restores a eovalently closed DNA
molecule missing the segment between the re-
peats (Conley et al., 1986; Pulak and Anderson,
1988). These models apply to deletions arising via
intramoleeular events. However deletions result-
ing from intermolecular homologous recombina-
tion between long (20 bp or more) direct repeats
have been reported to occur in bacteriophage T4
and some ColE1 plasmids (Dianov et al., 1991;
Mazin etal., 1991; Singer and Westlye, 1988). A
special case of deletions brought about by inter-
molecular recombination seems to occur through
the introduction by DNA gyrases and topoisom-
erases of single- and double-strand breaks at sites
of very little sequence homology, i.e. 3 bp (Ikeda
etal., 1984; Ikeda, 1986).
There are eases of deletions in the same repli-
con mediated by different mechanisms depending
on the length of the direct repeats, or other
parameters. To give a few examples.
(A) Brunier et al. (1989) reported that deletion
of inverted repeats in engineered single-stranded
40000108

DNA plasmids in E. coil occurred by a repliea-
tive slippage mechanism between flankSng direct
repeats 9 bp long, but by a breakage znd reunion
recombination proce~ss when the direct repeats
were 18 bp or longer.
(B) The formation of deletions between direct
repeats of at least 20 bp in pBR327 derivatives
was always associated with dimerization of pins-
mid DNA (Dianov et al., 1991; Mazin et al.,
1991), but this apparently occurred by different
mechanisms, depending on the length of homol-
ogy. In the case of ve~j long direct repeats (165-
401 bp), deletion and the accompanying dimeriza-
tion occurred mainly by unequal crossing-over in
a Rec+ background, while with smaller direct
repeats (21 and 42 bp) the deletion frequency was
greatly increased in recB- recC- backgrounds.
This was interpreted as resulting from recombi-
nation events taking place while the plasmids
were undergoing rolling circle replication, which
is inhibited by RecBC nuclease (Cohen and Clark,
1986; Mazin et al., 1991).
(C) There are three different events in Tnl0
excision from chromosomal sites (Foster et al.,
1981): precise excision, in which the entire trans-
posen is removed between 9-bp direct repeats to
restore the wild-type sequence; near-precise exci-
sion which eliminates most of the transposon
except for a 50-bp remnant between short repeats
internal to Tnl0, and excision of the 50-bp rem-
nant between the 9-bp direct repeats. Mutations
isolated for stimulating Tn10 excision from the
chromosome (tex mutations) stimulated precise
and near precise excision, but had no effect on
the excision of the short, remnant sequence
(Lundblad and Kleckner, 1982).
(D) Enzymes which control superhelical ten-
sion can affect the deletion incidence of palin-
dromic, but not of non-palindromic sequences.
Sinden et al. (1991) found that deletion frequen-
cies of palindromic fragments cloned into the
EcoR1 site of pBR325 were increased by factors
between 10 and 25 in strains carrying the topo-
isomerase mutation topAIO, and decreased by
factors of 2-10 in strains carrying the gyrase
mutation g~,rB225. In contrast deletion frequen-
cies of non-palindromic inserts were not affected
by these mutations. In summary, it appears that
deletions as well as other genetic rearrangements
195
are the re.suit of a "grab bag of processes" (Low,
1988) which normally participate in various as-
pects of DNA metabolism and which are yet to
be identified.
A fruitful approach to elucidate deletion path-.
ways is to fo~us on specific events where the
structural parameters are knoxvn or can be con-
trolled, and use mutants to see how they affect
these events. This would include tmoxvn mutants
in genes for DNA metabolism, as well as new
mutants isolated by their ability to alter the inci-
dence of deletion. A number of such mutants
have been obtained using different selection sys-
tems. Not surprisingly the different .approaches
appear to have implicated different genes. With
the exception of the uup mutations (Hopkins et
al., 1983) selected by the stimulation of transpo-
son Tn5 excision on an F' plasmid, and an as yet
unidentified gene between xth and pnc whose
deletion stimulates the occurrence of 1.3-kbp
deletions in a derivative of plasmid pBR322 (Yi,
Stearns and Demple, 1988), all other mutations
thus isolated have turned out to be new alleles of
already known genes. In general these have been
of two types: (a) null alleles in which gene func-
tion is lost, and (b) novel alleles giving enzymes
with new properties. The recovery of null alleles
indicates the presence of functions which nor-
mally act to prevent the formation of deletions.
]n this group we can mention some of the rex
mutations of Lundblad and Kleekner (1982, 1985)
selected for enhancement of transposon Tnl0
excision (texB, texC, texD and texE) which fall
genes for mismatch repair functions; a mutation
in topB, the gene for topoisomerase III which
eliminates the activity of this enzyme and en-
hances deletions in an F'lac plasmid (Whoriskey
et al., 1991; Schofield et al., 1992); and the xth-
pnc deletion mentioned above (Yi, Stearns and
Demple, 1988). In the second group, namely alle-
les giving enzymes with new properties, are the
tex,4 mutations (Ltmdblad and Kleekner, 1982;
Lundblad et al., 1985) which are novel alleles of
recBC, and the new alleles of sbcB, the geue for
exonuelease I isolated by Allgood and Silhavy
(1991) for their stimulation of deletions in plas-
mid pZ157. The presence of mutations of this
type indicates that some functions which normally
do not participate in deletion formation have
40000109

been altered by mutation in such a way that they
now take an active part in forming these rear-
rangements.
Although the isolation of mutants by their
ability to alter deletion incidence has yielded,
thus far, mostly phenomenological information,
these mutants have been extremely useful in
identifying poss~le pathways and will be of great
value for the future study of the molecular mech-
anisms responsible for deletions. One fruitful ap-
proach at this time is to determine the effects of
different mutations on structurally well-defined
deletions. In this paper I review some of our work
in progress to show how a combined approach
using mutations together with well-characterized
deletion substrates can b~. used to identify path-
ways for specific classes of deletions. We will
discuss first the isolation and characterization of
mutations which enhance deletion incidence in
plasmid pMC874 (dli, for "deletion increase'"
mu.tations) and these will then be compared, for
their effects on a variety of deletions, to muta-
tions in SOS repair.
Isolation and characterization of mutations which
stimulate deletions in plasmid pMC874 -- A new
recBC allele
Plasmid pMC874 (Fig. 1) was constructed by
Casadaban et al. (1980). This plasmid carries
pMC874
Fig. I. Structure of plasmid p!k~C874 and two Lac+ revertants. The diagram of p},~C,.q74 has been
slightly modified from Casadaban
et al. (19S0) and the structures of pEB7 and pEBI9 have been arrived at by restrict{on enzyme
analysis (Fig. 2). Both pEB7 and
pEBI9 give a Lac+Kms phenot~e, indicating the deletion of a fragment which joins the "/onr promoter
to the promoterless lac
~peran. Based on restriction anal~[s data, pEB7 has a delet[on of about ~0t} bp and pEB19 a deletion
of about 700-8t30 bp plus an
insertion of cquivaIent size opposite the deletion containing a second Pstl site. Both deletions in
pEB7 and pEB19 eliminate the
BamHl restriction site.
40000110

40000111

TABLE 1
PLEIOTROPIC PHENOTY'PES OF all MUTANTS AND CONTROLS
Strains Geaob~e Phage
Reeomb. Mutator *
T42- Ared- gam-
P1 trar~sd. Rif~ ~ Rifr
EB265 WT - s
ND 1 (34)
EB3L3 rec-2251 (dill) s-m el
0.02 0.2
EB3Z5 dli2 - - ND
4.7
EB335 dli3 l-el ND
24.5
AFT3Z5 WT - s 1
1 (20)
EB934 rec-2251 (P1 323 ×
AFT325) s-m el
< 0.01 0.3
V74 recC343 - - 1
ND
JC54Ol recB21C22 s-m el ND
ND
ND. not done: WT, wild-type.
Plaque sizes of mutant phages on different hosts are indicated as per Schultz et al. (1983), as
follows: el, extra larg/~; I, large; m,
medium; s, small: -, no visible plaques.
* Relative frequencies of Rift with WT = 1- Absolute freq. X 10-~ in parentheses.
carry it, but gives rise to Lac÷ papillae at very
low frequency (!.6 × 10-9) on McConkey's agar
(Balbinder, 1988). Plasmids in these papillae carry
deletions which join the kmr promoter to the
lacZ gcne in pMC874 (Fig. 1). We know from
restriction enzyme analysis (Fig. 2) that there are
at least three deletion-associated events in plus-
mid pMC874 and there may be more. The three
events identified thus far are: (a) a single 600-bp
deletion (pEB7, Fig. 1); (b) a deletion of about
700-800 plus an insertion of equivalent size on
the opposite side of the plasmid (pEBI9, Fig. 1),
and (c) dimerization of the plasmid accompanied
by a deletion of about 700-800 bp (Fig. 2). The
deletion in plasmid pEB7 could be the result of
an intramolecular event, while pEB19 and the
dimer plasmids may represent intermolecular
events.
31 dli mutations were selected for a high papil-
lation phenotype (Balbinder, 1988). 3 of these,
which we tentatively designated dlil, dli2 and
dli3 have been studied thus far. Our results indi-
cate that d]il is a new recBC allele while dli2 and
dli3 are not. The dlil mutation has been mapped
by bacteriophage Pl-mediated transduction and
found to be closely linked to thyA and arg~ at
60.3 rain on the E. coli chromosome, a segment
that includes the recB and recC genes. It has
been renamed rec-2251. The other two muta-
tions, dli2 and dli3 did uot cotransduce, with
thyA or argA. The phenotypes of the strains
containing the mutations dlil, dli2 and dli3
(strains EB323, 325 and 335, respectively) are
shown in Tables 1 and 2. In Table 1 we shmv how
these strains plate certain bacteriophage mutants,
their recombinational ability and whether they
possess a mutator phenotype. In Table 2 we show
how they affect the frequency of Lac-~ Lae+
deletions in plasmid pMC874 and the excision of
the transposon Tnl0 from a chromosomal site,
ga176::TnlO (Tex phenotype). Table 1 also in-
cludes several controls, as follows. (1) Strain
EB934 is a transductant from the cross used to
TABLE 2
RELATIVE FREQUENCIES OF Lac- ~ Lac ~" DELE-
TION IN PLASMID pMC.874 AND Tnl0 EXCISION FROM
A CHROMOSOMAL SITF, (ga176:'.TulO) IN dli MU-
TANTS
Absolute frequencies, expressed as the average number of
papillae per plate for cells growing eonfluently on MeConkel,
agar, are shown in parentheses.
Strain
Gcnotype Lac- ~ Lac+ Gal- ~ Gal+
pMC874 ga176::TnlO
EB265 WT 1 (5.3) I (126)
EB323 rec-2251 72 0.13
V74 recC.~43 ND 4
EB325 dli2 3 > 24
EB335 dli3 63 > 17
40000112

replace recBCD + in strain AFT325 (Amundsen
et al., 1990) with rec-2251; (2) strain AFT325; (3)
EB265, which is strain MCI0fI0 (Casadaban and
Cohen, 1980) carrying plasmid pMC874 and the
ancestor of EB323, 325 and 335 (Balbinder, 1988);
(4) JC5491 0,Villets and Clark, 1969) is a double
mutant for the classical null alleles recB21 and
recC22; (5) V74 carries the ter.A mutation recC343
(Lundblad et al., 1984). RecBCD is a multifunc-
tional enzyme complex composed of the products
of three genes, recB, recC and recD. Null muta-
tions in recBC result in the loss of the enzyme's
nuelease activities and a decrease in recombina-
tional capability, the residual recombination be-
ing due to the recF pathway (Smith, 1988; Taylor,
1988). All the strains in Table 1 were tested for
their ability to plate the bacteriophages T4 2-
and A red-garn- (Amundsen et al., 1990), re-
combinational ability as determined by phage
Pl-mediated transduction, and mutator phenotye
(Lundblad and Kleckner, 1982) measured by the
spontaneous mutation frequency from rifampicin
sensitivity to resistance (Rif~ ~ Rift). The ability
of an E. coli host to plate the bacteriophage
mutants T4 2- and A red-gain- is a useful test
to for ReeBCD nuelease activity (Lundblad and
Kleekner, 1982; Amundsen et al., 1990). The DNA
of phage T4 2- mutants is rapidly degraded by
RecBCD enzyme so these fail to make plaques
on recBC + cells but do on recBC null mutants
(Amundsen et al., 1990). 3. red-gain- can grow
well in recBC- mutants but not in wild-type E.
coli because in the latter the RecBCD enzyme
degrades concatemeric DNA, the only source of
progeny lambda DNA and the A gain gene prod-
uct prevents this from happening (Smith, 1983).
The red- mutation eliminates the red recombi-
nation pathway, which allows the production of
some lambda progeny in recBCD + strains (ref.
above). The null alleles recC22 and recB21 are
deficient in recombination as well as all nuclease
activities tested (Taylor, 1988). The phenotype
conferred by mutation rec-2251 (strains EB323
and EB934) resembles that of the recB21 recC22
strain JC5491 in ability to plate T42- and A
red-gam- (Table 1), and in having a decreased
recombinational ability as reported by other
workers (Willets and Clark, 1969; Taylor, 1988).
Also, like null recBC-, rec-2251 differs from texA
alleles in these respects (Lundblad and Kleetmer,
1982; Lundblad et al., 1984). The latter are un-
able to plate A red-garn- and have normal re-
combinational ability (strain V74, Table 1) and a
normal spontaneous mutation frequency, i.e. no
mutator phenotype (refs. above) while rec-2251
acts as an antimutator, i.e. it shows a decrease in
spontaneous mutation frequency from Rifs to
Rifr. As shown in Table 2, the rec-2251 mutation
also differs from recC343 in having a negative
Tex phenotype, i.e. it inhibits Tnl0 excision while
recC343 stimulates it, as expected (Lundblad et
al., 1984). As shown by strain EB934 (Table 1)
the pleiotropic phenotype conferred by rec-2251,
i.e., ability to plate phages T42- and X red-gara-,
reduced recombinational ability and antimutator
phenotype, cosegregates intact in transductional
crosses. The rec-2251 mutation is the first case of
a new recBC allele recovered by selecting for
enhancement of a deletion event since the rex,4
mutations were isolated (Lundblad and Kleckner,
1982).
The other two dli mutations, dli2 and dli3,
have not been mapped yet but, as mentioned
above, we know that they are not new recBC
alleles. Interestingly however, their phenotypes
(Tables 1 and 2) resemble other rex mutations
corresponding to genes in methylation directed
mismatch repair. The dli2 mutation resembles
the texB/uorD mutations in the gene coding for
helicase 1I in its total inability to plate ~ red-
gam-, mutator and Tex phenotypes (Lundblad
and Kleekner, 1982, 1985). The mutation dli3
resembles phenotypically the mismatch mutants
texC /mutH, texD /rautS and texE /dam (Lundb-
lad and Kleckner, 1982, 1985) in its ability to
plate ,~ red-gain-, mutator and Tex phenotypes
(Tables 1 and 2).
Derivatives of pBR325 used to study deletions
To control the structural parameters of dele-
tions we have constructed derivatives of the plas-
mid pBR325 carrying inserts of different size and
sequence cloned into the EcoRI site of the chlo-
ramphenicol acetyl transferase (cat) gene. This
inactivates the gene and makes the cells carrying
such plasmids sensitive to chloramphenicol (CmS).
Since the only variables in these constructs are
40000113

the size and sequence of the inserts (Fig. 3),
differences in deletion frequency (Cm~ Cmr)
would likely be the result of these parameters.
The construction of the plasmids has been de-
scribed in detail (Balbinder et al., 1989; Sinden et
al., 1991) but is briefly summarized here to hell)
the reader. The relevant features of these plas-
raids are shown in Fig. 3. In both pRS1 and
pRS4, the insert is a non-palindromic 64-bp
HaelIl fragment of plasmid pBR322 with EcoR!
linkers added, but they differ in the sequence of
the insert termini. In pRSI the insert is flanked
by the same 8-bp sequence which includes an
EcoRI site, while in pRS4 it carries an additional
copy of the 8-bp repeat on the 3' side as a
consequence of a 9-bp duplication. Because of
the orientation of the insert in both plasmids, the
terminal homologies include adjacent sequences
to the left of each EcoPd linker which generate
terminal 17-bp repeats (18-bp in pRS4) with a
15/17-bp (or 15/18-bp) homology. In oRS4, the
TABLE 3
SPONTANEOUS DELETION FREOUENCIES × 10-9
(CmS~Crn*) IN PLASMID pBR325 DERIVATIVES IN
DIFFERENT WILD-TYPE E. cofi STRAINS
Plasmid Strain
SC30-RP MC1000
pRS1 13+ 0.6 2.6_+ 0.8
pRS4 985 _+189 648 5:114
pOCEI5 47 + 15 73 +_ 7
FI4C. 241 + 90 614 ::1:159
FI4S 25 + 9 47 + 9O
9-bp tandem duplication creates a second perfect
ll-bp direct repeat xvhich overlaps with the im-
perfect 18-bp one. The presence of the over/ap-
ping direct repeats in pRS4 increased the dele-
tion frequency by more than five hundredfold
over pRSI (Table 3), presumably because of the
possible formation in pRS4 of multiple deletion
intermediates between the terminal direct re-
pR$1
pRS4
pOCE15
FJ~. ~. Relevant sequences of the pBR32~-derJvcd plasmids. (A) Sequencc of
unique ~coR] site o~ the ca~ ~¢ne (bo~ed).
pBR325 8enerafin~ at Ioast o~e such s~te (boxed) at e~ch end. "~e p~'rfect b~rpia str~ctur¢
pot¢~tial[y [ormed in ~OC~15 Js
shown. The e~tcnded direct repeats i~ pRS1 and thc ovcrlappia~ direct repeats of pRS4 arc
u~d¢rlln~d. M~smatches ig the ~ep¢ats
are indicated by asterisks. For more details see text, Balbinder et al., 1989 and Sinden et
ai., 1991.
40000114

peats (Balbinder et al., 1989). The other three
plasmids, pOCE15, F14C and F14S carI3' palin-
dromic inserts differing in size and sequence.
Plasmid pOCE15 contains a 60-bp perfect palin-
drome consisting of an inverted repeat of a lac
operator fragment (Betz and Sadler, 1981; Bal-
binder et al., 1989). Plasmids F14C and F14S
were constructed by Sinden et al. (1991), and
each carries the same 100-bp insert. They differ
in that 14C is a perfect palindrome while the
center sequences in F14S are non-palindromic
(Fig. 3). The spontaneous deletion frequencies of
these five plasmids in two "wild-type" strains:
SC30RP (Wit'Ida et al., 1982) and MC1000
(Casadaban and Cohen, 1980) are shown in Table
3. The results are similar in both strains and in
agreement with previous reports (Balbinder ctal.,
1989; Sinden et al., 1991).
Effect of SOS processing and dli mutations on
the deletion of palindromic and non-palindromic
inserts in derivatives of plasmid pBR325
The participation of SOS processing in dNe-
t.ion formation is discussed in detail in a separate
paper (Balbinder et al., 1993). We want to com-
pare here the effects of mutations in SOS-repair
genes to those of dli mutations to see whether
the same deletions can be brought about by dif-
ferent mechanisms. Table 4 summarizes experi-
ments presented in detail in the report above,
comparing the frequencies of Cm~ ~ Cmr dele-
tions in pBR325 derivatives to those of base pair
201
substitutions in the chromosome (measured from
the reversion of the mutation trpE65 from Trp-
---> Trp+), in SC30RP-derived strains carr~qng
different combinations of alleles for the SOS-re-
pair genes recA, lexA and umuC. The results
show that deletion of the palindromic inserts was
stimulated by overproduction of ReeA*730 and
UmuC+ in ~471::Tn5 mutants, which lack LexA
repressor and are consequently fully derepressed
for the SOS genes (Walker, 1984), but deletion of
the non-palindromic inserts was unaffected (com-
pare strains Nos. 1 and 4, Table 4). The recA730
allele makes a genetically activated RecA* pro-
tein and shows a mutator phenotype, i.e an in-
crease in spontaneous mutation frequency (com-
pare No. 1 to No. 2 and No. 4, Table 4, and see
Witkin et al., 1982; Sweasy et at., 1990). Since the
enhancement of palindrome deletion parallels
that of Trp '--> Trp+ reversion we concluded that
the former is caused by some form of SOS pro-
cessing (Balbinder et al., 1993). However, the
data indicate that there are differences between
deletions and base substitutions. For example re-
placement of umuC+ by umuC122::Tn5, a null
aline of urnuC, reduced both point mutation and
palindrome deletion frequency in plasmid
pOCE15, but the former was reduced by a much
larger factor than the latter (compare Nos. 4 and
5 in Table 4). Also the overproduction of ReeA+
protein in a lexA71::Tn5 strain increased point
mutation Irequency, although not to the same
extent as RecA*730, while not affecting deletion
frequency noticeably (compare Nos. 1, 3 and 4 in
TABLE 4
RELATIVE FREQUENCIES OF SPONTANEOUS Cm~ --* Cm' DELETIONS IN DERIVATIVES OF PLASMID taBR325 ('Fig.
3) AND Trp- ~ Trp+ REVERSIONS IN ISOGBNIC STRAINS CARRYING DIFFERENT COMBINATIONS OF recA, lexA
AND umuC ALLELES
Absolute frequencies are shown in parentheses and are expressed as the number of Cmr revertants per
109 cells for deletions (see
SC30-RP in Table 3), and as the average number of Trp+ revertants per plate for base substitution
mutations. Data from
Balbinder et al. (1993).
No. Relevant genotype Non-palindromos
Palindromes Trp- -* Trp +
recA lexA umuC pRS1 pRS4 pOCE15
F14C F14S revs.
I + + + 1 (1.5) I (985) 1 (47)
1 (241) (1) 25 1 (16)
2 730 + + 1.4 0.9 2.3
1.1 1.4 13
3 + 71::Tn5 + 1.8 0.8 1.5
2.7 0.7 4
4 730 71::Ta5 + 1.5 1.15 14.2
6.2 3 32
5 730 71::Tn5 122::Tn5 ND ND 4.2 ND
ND 1.5
40000115

202
Table 4). Our results also indicate that deletion
enhancement by SOS processing favors perfect
palindromes o~'er imperfect ones (F14C vs. F14S)
and perhaps smaller palindromes over larger ones
(pOCE15 vs. F14C), and that the sequences of
terminal repeats are not important parameters in
this process as shown by the lack of enhancement
of the deletion of the non-palindromic inserts in
pRS1 and pRS4. These observations suggest that
the SOS effect depends on the recognition of
palindromy vs. non-palindromy, i.e. the configu-
ration of the transient intermediates formed on
single-stranded stretches of DNA during replica-
tion, rather than on the sequences of the terminal
homologies or those of the palindromic inserts in
pBR325.
In Table 5 we show how different deletion
events in the pBR325 derived plasmids are af-
fected in strains carrying the different dli muta-
tions. The mutation rec-2251 (strain EB323) had
no major effect on the deletion of non-
palindromic inserts but reduced substantially the
deletion of both perfect palindromes while that
of the imperfect palidrome in F14S was inhibited
by only a factor of two. It is interesting that these
effects are exactly the reverse of those shown in
Table 4 for SOS processing, again suggesting the
possibility that certain enzymes can differentiate
between deletion substrates based on their see-
oudary structure. Table 4 also shows that the
texA mutation recC343 and the null alleles recB21
recC22 have no major effect on the deletion of
the non-palindromic inserts and, perhaps, inhibit
slightly the deletion of the palindromic inserts. In
contrast to rec-2251, all deletion events, both of
palindromes and non-palindromes, were in-
creased albeit to different extents in the presence
of dli2 (strain EB325), while dli3 (strain EB335)
showed no major effect on palindrome deletions
and only minor reductions in the deletion of
perfect palindromes.
Other deletions -- Effects of SOS functions and
of dli mutations on excision of Tnl0 from chro-
mosomal sites and of dli mutations on deletions
in pMC874
In this section we compare the effect of differ-
ent mutations on a variety of deletion events.
Although the results are still incomplete, these
comparisons suggest ways in which different ge-
netic functions could participate in giving rise to
various classes of deletions. The d/i mutations
were selected for the stimulation of Lac-~ Lac+
deletions in a different replicon, plasmid pMC874,
which were larger than the ones in pBR325. Also
as xve have seen, deletions in pMC874 could
result from more than one event (Figs. 1 and 2).
The excision of the transposon Tnl0 from chro-
mosomal sites represents a class of deletions
which differs from those in pBR325 derivatives
and pMC874 in every structural parameter: size
of the deletion, size and sequences of the termi-
nal direct repeats, location on a different repli-
TABLE 5
EFFECTS OF dli MUTATIONS ON DELETION FREQUENCIES IN pBR325 DERIVED PLASMIDS
Strain Allele
Plasmids
Cms ~ Cmr
Non-palindromes Palindromes
pRS1 pRS4 pOCE15 FI4C F14$
EB265 WT 1 (2.6) 1 (648) 1
(73) l (614) 1 (47)
JC5491 recB21recC22 1.15 2.3 0.7
0.55 0.55
V74 recC343 0.4 1.1 0.2
0.3 0.14
EB323 rec-2251 1.5 2.2 0.04
0.05 0.5
EB325 dli-2 22 8.6 3.5
10A 15.4
EB335 dli-3 0.8 2 0.2
0.3 1.04
Relative frequencies of deletion in derivatix'es of plasraid pBR325 in dli and recBC mutants.
Absolute frequencies are shown in
parenthese.s and expressed as the number of Cmr revertants per 109 cells plated (see MC1000 in Table
3).
40000118
