Tobacco Institute
This Is a Tobacco Advertisement Before H.R. 5041
Fields
- Named Person
- HHS
- US Supreme CRT
- Aclu
- Wa Legal FNDN
- CNCL Economic Advisers
- Koop
- Litigation
- DOJ CIVIL
- UCSF Code
- aab40c00
- Type
- Newsletterpamphlet
- Request
- DOJRFPIIIH2C
- Date Produced
- 01 Feb 2002
- Date Loaded
- 14 Jun 2002
- 15 Mar 2003
- Area
- TI STORAGE BOX 8241
- Author
- Amer Advertising Federation
- Amer Assn Advertising Agencies
- Assn Natl Advertisers
- Magazine Publ Assn
- Outdoor Advertising Assn America
- Point Purchase Advertising Inst
- Freedom Advertise Coalition
- Box
- 343
Document Images
T10993-0556

This is a tobacco advertisement before H.R. 5041.
CMD Wa
On Ifvr'I0
M
Cl'%O~;~`.~
SURGEON GENERACS WARNING: Smoking
Caises Lung Canaei, Hezii DIseese.
Emphysema, And May Complicata Pregnancy-
T10993-0557

This is a tobacco advertisement after H.R. 5041.
WARNING:
Cigarettes Kill
CAROLINA
CIGARETTES
WARNING:
Cigarettes Kill
CAROLINA
CIGARETTES
INSWnIrNrF~IryI!,lyInyduyansllyl.
snl 9cemi-. ribm mlli Nniqrv~ny Mr i
i
ib 9pgm8y m~In CriMIA9 Nf9k. Mlii
AeUI I IUNOL INIUNMNI ION AEOUTAEU
er HHS IryixM1 IrrNrspmsi Lyt ynr
LN1WrymrurmIosiyl. rySlsnsGLlMn
mm, onmNivny ren .. n I
n rMn s yllrrvd NoG[ Mnumm ml Noll.
bm.ncqmicrmcynvmiocrosruna
20 CLASS A CIGAFEiTES
ADDITIONAL INfURMATION REQUIRED BY HHS Yhr Iryyrl snl cotl Opsdnh drlnyd got
ehsg in yhr opinion Ng IYV, id yhr motly hsntdomr plrtlmysylpn og Mr riprgsvr sa vlrryrl yttr
trdlhnrt. Rge Ulakua semes u6lree weuggls presebls a retresgu6g serut nclterbm
agreeabkr'ryt II Ige Irtlubart ub everl resoect Ut us tgus sinewgal clblratlutlirt tlr.oarlyre
Available from your local retailer
Color? Prohibited. Pictures? Prohibited. People? Prohibited.
Trademark Logos or Symbols? Prohibited. Slogans? Questionable ...
H.R. 5041 combines draconian warning format
requirements with drastic restrictions on ad content.
These restrictions would render tobacco advertising
virtually useless. Indeed, the content control restric-
tions would prevent producers of a legal product from
using traditional visual techniques to communicatc
with consumers of that product. The bill is, in effect,
proposed government censorship of commercial free
speech. It would violate the First Amendment of our
Constitution and would establish a landmark precedent
for restricting or banning the advertising of countless
other legal products.
H.R. 5041 IS AN ADVERTISING BAN IN
SHEEP'S CLOTHING. YOU HAVE OPPOSED AD
BANS IN THE PAST. DO NOT BE FOOLED BY ,
THIS THINLY VEILED IMPERSONATION.
T10993-0558

Seven reasons why H.R. 5041 should be rejected.
1. H.IL 5041 Does Not Just Propose Restrictions.
It Creates a De Facto Ban.
The restraints imposed on tobacco product advertis-
ing by H.R. 5041 would render such advertising
virtually useless. The bill would not allow the
manufacturers of these legal products to com-
municate with their consumers nor use advertising
to compete for a larger share of the available
market.
2. H.R. 5041 Would Prohibit Unconstitutionally the
Use of Pictures and Illustrations.
The U.S. Supreme Court has stated affirmatively
that pictures and illustrations "serve important com-
municative functions" and are "entitled to the First
Amendment protections afforded verbal commercial
speech:" This conclusion applies directly to the
specific restraints that would be imposed by H.R.
5041.
3. The Bill Seeks to Lower Communications Aimed
at Adults to the Level of the Sandbox.
The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that in an effort
to protect the young by restricting advertising, the
government cannot "reduce the adult population [to
seeing] only that which is fit for children:' Adults
lawfully entitled to use tobacco should not be denied
truthful, non-deceptive information about its avail-
ability simply because tobacco advertisements may
be seen by minors who cannot legally purchase the
products.
4. H.R. 5041 Fails to Pass Constitutional Muster.
The American Civil Liberties Union, the Washington
Legal Foundation and numerous other constitutional
authorities have testified that the massive scheme of
governmental censorship proposed by H.R. 5041 is
unconstitutional. The bill is "broader than reason-
ably necessary" to advance the goal of reducing
smoking. Also, there is no evidence that the
restraints imposed by the bill would significantly
advance the government's interest. The President's
American Advertlsing American Association Associatinn of p7agazine Pubtishers Outdoor Adverlising
Federation ofAdvertising Agencies National Advertisers Acsociation AssocialionofAmerica
1400 K Street, NW 1899 L Street, NW 1725 K Street, NW 1211 Conn. Ave. 1212 New York Ave., N W
Suile1000 Suhe700 Suiie601 Suite4t16 Suite1270
Washington,D.C.20035 Washington, D.C.20036 Washington, D,C.20096 Washinglon, D,C.20036 Washington.
D.C. 20005
(202) 898-0089 (202) 331-7345 (202) 785-1525 (202) 296-7277 (202) 371-5566
Council of Economic Advisers concluded that bans
and restraints on tobacco advertising have not
worked in foreign countries. Why would they work
in the United States?
5. H.R. 5041 Would Not Decrease Overall
Consumption of Tobacco Products.
Supreme Court precedent clearly establishes that the
government bears a heavy burden of proving that its
proposed censorship will directly advance the pur-
ported goal of reducing tobacco consumption.
Numerous studies confirm that children's attitudes
and behavior regarding smoking are developed
primarily through experience with parents, other
family members and peers-not advertising. In fact,
even former Surgeon General Koop found: "There
is no scientifically rigorous study available to the
public that provides a definitive answer to the basic
question of whether advertising and promotion
increase the level of tobacco consumption."
6. H.R. 5041 Would Undermine Existing Federal
Legislation.
A purpose of the Federal Cigarette Labeling and
Advenising Act was to prevent "diverse, non-
uniform and confusing cigarette labeling and adver-
tising regulation." H.R. 5tk11 would authorize state
and local governments to ban or restrict the tobacco
advertising that is currently allowed by Congress.
7. Tobacco Advertising Today, Alcohol and High
Cholesterol Foods Tomorrow. What Next?
Precedents established by passage of H.R. 5041
would set the stage for similar restrictions and bans
on the advertising of other legal products considered
unacceptable by some members of society. Once
opened, the censorship door may never be able to
be closed.
Every American adult has the right to receive infor-
mation about legal products through truthful and
non-deceptive advertising.
Express your objection to H.R. 5041 now.
FREEDOM
TO
ADVERTISE
COALITION
Point of Purchase
Advenising Institute
66 N. Van Brunt Street
Englewood. NJ
07631
(201)894-8899
T10993-0559
