Tobacco Institute
Abstract Form
Fields
- Named Person
- League, J.
- Healthy Buildings Intl
- Bogart, J.
- Turner, S.
- Mo, T.E.C.
- EPA
- Litigation
- DOJ CIVIL
- UCSF Code
- aaa40c00
- Type
- Other
- Request
- DOJCRFP
- Date Produced
- 13 Nov 2001
- Date Loaded
- 14 Jun 2002
- 15 Mar 2003
- Area
- TI STORAGE BOX 9241
- Box
- 313
Document Images
V
L . -
Abstract Form
Papernumber 90-92.6
Authot'sname Simon Turner
Type your abstract single-spaced in the blue box below. Do not use small type since your abstract
will be reduced
by 40%. Do not exceed the limits of the box. At the top of the box, type the title of the paper in
upper- and lower-
case letters. Follow the title with a comma and then the name of the authors Underline the name of
the speaker.
Put a comma after the author and speaker, and then type their affiliation and then their complete
mailing address.
Example
Biological Remediation of Underground Storage Facilities, John D. Bogart and iames R. League. Mo
Tec, Inc., P.O.
Box 338, Mt Juliet, TN 37122-0338
Underground storage facilities take many forms. Any breach in the integrity of an underground system
leads to
serious problems. Mo Tec, Inc. has developed biological treatment techniques to remediate sites so
contaminated.
Virtually any organic material is biodegradable if treated appropriately. Mo Tec uses enhanced
landfarm tech-
niques, liquid solid contact digestion and a combination of techniques called the slurry hold drying
bed process.
This technology was commercially applied to a wood treating plant in Tennessee. The major target
material to be
treated was creosote sludge designated K-oDl by the EPA. The process achieved 98-99% removal
efficiency. Besides
eliminating toxic materials, the physical bulk was diminished as 4500 cubic yards were treated in a
pilot study.
Only 9-15 cubic yards of residual material was measured.
'OP5~5
Two Indoor Air Investigations -- Oceans Apart, Simon Turner, Healthy Buildings
International, Inc. (HBI), 10378 Democracy Lane, Fairfax, Virginia, 22030, USA
This paper presents two case histories of similarly sized yet contrasting buildings recently
studied on the east and westEoat of the United States. Both buildings had been the
subject of identical complaints by occupants yet they have been selected here to demonstrate
their completely different engineering characteristics and basic causes of these complaints.
One reflects its east coast heritage in its age (more than 50 years old), its occupants
(government employees) and its ventilation system which was powerful, dirty and poorly
~fitte¢: Equally, the west coast building symbolized its location; new, mirrored sealed
windows and clean systems but with high levels of recycled air, an obstructive VAV system
and some design flaws. This paper questions the use of occupant questionnaires in such
cases and uses these contrasting buildings to highlight the need instead for careful
evaluation of the air supply systems themselves, as well as routine on-going "proactive"
monitoring. The different filtration systems in use also demonstrate the need for a new
standard test method for HVAC filters which reflects their ability to specifically remove
respirable sized particles. Both these buildings were studied in July, 1989.
nl~Pw*^xwu ~
T10991-0498
