Center for Tobacco Research
[Analytical Alternatives to Radioimmunoassay: a Review]
Fields
Annotations
- 1. Castro, A. Author
- Affiliation:
Univ Miami School of Medicine
- Affiliation:
- 2. Malkus, H. Author
- Affiliation:
Univ Miami School of Medicine
- Affiliation:
- 3. Monji, N. Author
- Affiliation:
Univ Miami School of Medicine
- Affiliation:
- 4. Voigt, W. Author
- Affiliation:
Univ Miami School of Medicine
- Affiliation:
Document Images
H K321 91 068
ANALYTICAL ALTERNATIVES TO RADIOIMMUNOASSAY:
A REV IE6V
A. Castro, N. Monji, W. Voigt and Ii. Malkus
Department of Pathology
Hormone Research Laboratory
University of Miami, School of Medicine
Miami, Florida
71I3STRACT
Radioimmunoassay has been used increasingly in recent years
as an analytical technique for the detection of minute.quantities
of substances in numerous body fluids.' It is high ly sensitive
and specific. This procedure, however, has several disadvantages,
such as radioactive hazard, waste disposal, licensing, FDA
regulations over instruments and reagent production, and the short
shelf life of reagents. Thus we have reviewed analytical
alternatives to radioimmunoassay to consider the possibility for
the development of methods capable of performing quantitative
assays which will. detect level of substances with less than
10-9g/ml. In all immunoassay techniques reviewed, the use of
radioactive material is avoided.
CTR MN C0\FIpENTIAL- MINNE-93TA TOBACCO LITIGATION

H K021 91 069
INTROI)UC'TION
During the past few years, radioimmunoassay has become one
of the most rapidly growing analytical techniques used in the
clinical laboratory for the detection of minute quantities of
steroids, hormones, peptides, drugs, and other substances 'in body
fluids (Anderson and Breillatt 1971; Belanger et al, 1976; Castro,
1974; Castro 1975; Castro et al, 1974a; Castro et al, 1974b; Castro
et al, 1973a; Castro et al 1973bs Castro et al, 1974c; Castro and
Prieto, 1975; Castro et al, 1977). This technique has proven to
be highly sensitive and specific due mainly to the homogeneous
antibody. Also, the use of gamma-emitting isotopes for labeling
(i.e., 125 I) renders detection relatively simple. FIowever, these
labeled reagents have several disadvantages, such as short shelf
life, radioactive hazard, expensive equipment, and inefficiency in
the total number of disintegrations measured.
Analytical alternatives to radioimmunoassay -tacr detection
method, light scattering and slide-based techniques and isodensity
analyses - have been thus studied to determine the feasibility of
developing new approaches for the measurement of minute quantities
of substances;which could be free from the above mentioned restric-
tions. Such.methods
urine. cerebrospinal
-9
of 10 g/mh,-:Plasma
significant
trace
-:~.:
vitamins, tllerapeutic
Castro, 1973a=;^ Castro
et at. 1972)
could perform quantitative assays on serum,
fluid and/or saliva for substances at levels
and serum antigens considered to be clinically
levels include endocrine hormones, steroids,
drugs; and drugs of abuse (Castro, 1974;
and Prieto, 1975; Cheng et al, 1973; Chung
2
CTR M CDNFTDENTIAL ~ MZNhiE-MTA TC1Z3ACCQ LITxGATION

N K321 91 070
Most chemical analyzers presently in use are based on spectro-
photometry (colorimetry or fluorometry) and have a measurement
range of 10-6 to 10-9g/ml in concentrations. Several automated
immunoassays have been developed for the measurement of various
proteins in which the antigen-antibody complexes are determined by
their light scattering ability. Many non-radioactive labels, such
as enzymes (Castro et al, 1977), coenzymes, proteins, particles,
bacteriophages, and fluorogenic compounds, are also used. These
labels have'a longer shelf-life and less complex end point detector
than the isotope labels. Also, some of these assays do not
require separation of antibody bound and free fractions.
Other direct measurement techniques (i.e., gas chromatography,
liquid chromatography, differential pulse polarography, etc.) lack
specificity for the detection of trace quantities of substances
(steroids, hormones, etc.). On the other hand, indirect measurement
procedures using the antibody-antigen (tag) reaction are highly
specific and it now appears that any type of molecule (hapten) can
be attached or tagged to a protein carrier or synthetic polypeptide
(inununogen) and used to induce in animals antibodies specific for
the antigen determinant group. These determinants include sugars,
peptides, steroids, drugs, purines, pyrimidines, etc.
In the present review on immunoassays all the techniques
employing radioactive material are avoided. This advantage eliminates
not only the radioactive hazard to laboratory personnel, the
psychological implication involved and the problems of waste
disposal, but also eliminates licensing, strict F.D.A. regulations
on the manufacture of. the instruments and reagents, and the short
shelf life of reagents. -
G.T_R IrtN CDNF4TXNTI'a. : M14ESCtTA MfiACC0.L.I'LT.GAT11CN

A. Tag Detection W32 19 1O71
A substance or substances other than that being measured
sometimes interferes and reduces the limits of detection of a
given method. Thus, only new immunoassay methods which are
highly specific are outlined herein.
i. Electrochemistry - Although there are many variations of the
polarographic chemistry technique (Schneider and Sehon, 1961), it
essentially involves electrolysis of an electrolyte solution in a
fine bore glass capillary cell using a dropping mercury electrode
and a non-polarizable electrode. From the resulting current-voltage
characteristic curves, or polarograms, the identity and concentration
of the electro-oxidizable or -reducible substances present are
determined. As many as six substances can be identified from a
single polarogram with detection limits in the ppb range. However,
sensitivity is low, about 10-sM."
Oxygen interferes with polarographic analysis; however, if the
quantity of 02 in the sample is known, the characteristic half-voltage
parameter can be correlated to a well-defined substance concentration.
Since the antibody bound hapten is polarographically inactive, free
concentration of a polarographically active hapten can be determined.
With this technique, separation is eliminated in the characteri-
zation of the antibody-hapten interaction. Good agreement between
polarographic determination and conventional quantitative precipitation
has been shown (Zikan, 1966). Cost of equipment is low although
advanced methodology is necessary to lower the limits of detection.
4
LTR M a2wFIDENrLQt :r PITNNESQTA. TLI6'ACCQ LITI+CATILiN

N K3 21 91 072
ii. Spin hlagnet.ic Resonancn - Spectrometers, or spin resonance
instruments are capable of measuring several parameters related to
the precision of magnetic subatomic particles about an applied
steady magnetic field. "Free" electrons, protons and nuclei have
not only an intrinsic spin magnetic moment but mechanical spin
angular momentum around the magnetic axis.
Electron spin resonance (ESR) has been applied to drug screening.
In this method, known as FRAT (free radical assay technique),
replacement of spin-labeled analogues of hapten bound to an antibody
produced against the hapten with unlabeled (free) hapten results in
immediate increase of characteristic ESR triplet signal to yield
the free hapten concentration in the sample (Leute et al, 1972).
Reducing detection limits by ESR, however,
mentation costs.
will increase instru-
iii. blagnetome-'try -*In this method, either the magnetic moment
(magnetization/uhit sample volume) or the magnetic susceptibility
(magnetization/magnetic field) is measured. Iron or any molecule
with a permanent magnetic dipole moment could be used as
the tag.
With magnetometry, antigens or antibodies are tagged with a magnetic
label. After separation of bound and free fractions the concentration
of antibody bound..magnetic tags is determined in a magnetometer
through a calibration curve of concentration vs. magnetization
(Williams and Chase, 1971).
iv. P'luorometry - There are several variations of this method:
a. An.antigen is labeled with a fluorochrome and a
procedure similar to radioimmunoassay (competition, separation,
measurement) is followed. A fluorometer is used for measurement.
5
CTR W .CONF'...MEh1T1'FL' MTNNESOTA TOEAGGO LITTMTIDN

H K321 91 073
an<1 sample level is calibrated ng:iinst fluorescence intensity.
Intensity measurements, however, are unreliable (Cukor et al, 197G).
b. When the antibody is bound, fluorescence quenching
of a fluorophored antigen occurs. This method also can be
undependable in its intensity measurements due toquenching
reactions (Ullman et al, 1976).
c. A method of fluorescent polarization is used. The
assay principle is similar to the FRAT. When fluorochrome labeled
antigen or hapten is attached to a large antibody molecule,
polarization of fluorescence results. Replacement of labeled
antigen or hapten with unlabeled one in antibody bindinc, sites
results in inhibition of polarization (Dandliker and Saussure. 1970).
The sensitivity of this assay so far is similar to other currently
available fluorometric technique. As the change in molecular
tumbling is dependent upon the difference in molecular weight
between the bound and unbound fluorophore the method is limited to
compound of molecular weight of 20,000 or less.
v. Enzyme Immunoassay Techniques - Assay procedures using
antigens, haptens or antibodies labeled with an enzyme have heen
applied to the measurement of substances in biological'fluids.
These enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) are specific and highly sensitive
for the identification and measurement of various substances.
The assays are relatively simple and inexpensive. Extensive
reviews on this subject have been reported (Wisdom et al, 1976;
Schuurs and van Weemen, 1977). Although, EIAs are as sensitive
comparable radioimmunoassay, labeling and conjugation are
complicated. They are more susceptible to interference than
6
as
CTR M CDh1F".3DWMq...= -MIhlNESOTA TOBACCO LITIGATILIN

H i(321 91 074
other immunoassays. On the othoi- hand, all clinical chemistry
laboratories have the equipment necessary for enzyme determinations;
no special radioactive materials and handling procedures are
required and the photometric detection can be easily automated.
There are several types of EIA.
a. Competitive EIA for antigen. Labeled and unlabeled
antigens compete for binding sites on a limited
number of antibodies.
Solid phase or specific second antibody is used for separation.
Enzyme activity is determined and related to the concentration
of the unlabeled antigen (Engvall et al, 1971). This procedure
is similar to the classical Yalow and Berson (1960) radioinununo-
assay. In the sequential saturation variation the labeled
antigen is added after antigen-antibody binding takes place
(Castro, 1975). This is analogous to the sequential radio-
immunoassay (Hales and Ran31e, 1963).
b. "Imrr.unoenzymometric" assay for antigen. In this
method, antigen reacts with excess labeled antibody. Excess
solid phase antigen is added after incubation. The solid phase
antigen and the free labeled antibody remaining react. After
separation of the solid phase, enzyme activity associated with
soluble antigen is measured and related to antigen concentration
(Maiolini et al, 1975).
c. "Sandwich" EIA for antigen. In this method the
antigen has at least two binding sites. Antigen reacts first with
excess solid phase antibody. Fllowing incubation and washing,
the bound antigei, is treated with excess labeled antibody.
7
CT!? Mh1_LCtWICEPtTIAL. MINh1E'SOTA TCOACC:O LITICATICN

N K321 91J75
After another washing the bound l abel is assayed providing a
direcL quantitati.ve measure of the antigen present (Maiolini and
Masseyeff, i975)'.
d. EIA for antibody. Antibody to be quantitated is
first bound with excess solid phase antigen. After incubation and
washing, labeled second antibody specific for the first antibody
is added. Following further washing the bound label is assayed.
This provides a direct measurement of the amount of specific
antibody present (Kato et al, 1976).
e. Homogeneous EIA for haptens. In this EIA, separation
of bound and free label is not required as the technique depends
on inhibition or activation of the enzyme label by antibody
binding. In the first of this type of assay, a morphine der.ivative
was attached to lysozyme (Rubenstein et al, 1972). In a later
assay, phenobarbital derivative was attached to glucose 6-phosphate
dehydrogenase (Rowley et al, 1975):
f. Homogeneous reactant-labeled fluorescent immunoassay.
In this system, no conjugation of hapten to enzyme is needed.
Instead the hapten is covalently linked to fluorescent dye/enzyme
substrate conjugate. This hapten/fluorescent dye conjugate is
non-fluorescent under assay conditions and react with the enzyme
to yield fluorescent products. When the hapten/dye conjugate.
reacts with an antibody produced against the hapten, a complex
forms that prevents interaction of the bound conjugates with the
enzyme. In competitive binding reactions, hapten/dye conjugate
displaced by non-conjugated hapten in the sample reacts with the
8
CTR MN CDh1UMNUMV.. MINN~SOTA TOBAC,CO LITTGATIOh!

N K321 91 076
enzyme to give fluorescence which yield estimation of the hapten
concentration in the sample (Watson et al, 1976; Burd et al, 1971).
g. Other. EIAs. Three more EIAs for antibodies have been
r.eported. (Schuurs and van Weemen, 1977). In one of these methods,
labeled and unlabeled antibodies compete for solid phase antigen.
In the second method, labeled antigen reacts with it. In both
methods the quantity of antibody is determined by
measuring enzyme
activity in the free.and bound fractions after centrifugation.
In the third method, homogeneous EIA technique is employed using
phospholipase.C as a labeled enzyme and erythrocytes as substrates
(Wei and Riebe, 1977).
vi. Viroimmunoassay - The principle of this assay uses the
phenomena that bacteriophage-anti-phage complexes cannot adsorb
onto bacteria or inject their nucleic acid to produce plaques on
a layer of agar seeded with bacteria. In the assay, various
antigens or haptens were attached chemically to bacteriophage;
"anti-antigen" sera to neutralize the infectivity of the coupled
phages before subjecting to the plaque assay. The inhibition of
the neutralii"ation of the antigen-bacteriophage conjugate with
free antigens;was used as an antigen quantitation assay (Iiaimovich
et al, 19704Mray et al, 1975).
This ass=a.y system was shown to be very sensitive but both the
use of microb;iological assay systems and a long incubation period
make this approach of immunoassay rather unattractive to many
immunoassayists.
CTR MN COhlFIaENTTAL- MINNESt?TA TC1BACCLC.LIT7GATI0hJ

I3. Light Scattering Technique_;
Nlt02191077
In this.section, several optical. techniques which depend on
the operational principles of electromagnetic scattering theory
are discussed. These procedures monitor particle size or steric
changes which accompany reactive association of antigens and
antibodies rather than utilizing labels.
i. Ellipsometry - It involves the measurement of the effect
of reflection on polarized light and is used to determine the
thickness and refractive index of thin films with several angstrom
in thickness on solid surfaces and to measure optical constants of
reflecting surfaces.
The ellipsometer has been used to detect immunochemical
reactions at liquid-solid interfaces (Mathot and Rothen, 1969).
It was found that if a properly polarized electric current
(ti300ljamp),was applied during the antigen and antibody adsorption
periods, a clear differentiation was obtained between homologous
and heterologous sera. This current served to induce a substantial
concentration of antigens and antibodies near the charged surface,
at the same time reducing or preventing nonspecific material
adsorption of charge opposite that of the antibody molecules.
Research with this technique has strongly suggested that it is
capable of detecting levels much lower than any other techniques
(Rothen and Plathot, 1971).
ii. "Dip Slide" Assay - in this procedure a discontinuous
surface of.indium is coated onto a glass s.lide to which a
monomolecular layer of antigen is adsorbed. The presence of
homologous antibody is confirmed if, when the slide is dipped
10 ,
CTR MN GOWS4ENU6,,.:_,.WNAIE'SC1TA TL]EACt:O LITICATIC?N
