Ness Motley Documents
Implications of Battelle Hippo I & II and The Griffith Filter
Fields
- Notes
Issues: H-LC/y, H-CV, F-CTR, P-YTH
Affected Defendants: B&W
- Named Person
- Battelle
- Griffith
- Little
- Moss
- Newberger
- Clay, A.
- Hahn, P.
- Griffith
- Original File
- TobDocs1
- Author
- Yeaman, A.
- Keyword
- Hippo
- nicotine
- ACS
- Battelle
- surgeon general
- TRIC
- AHA
- Kent
- Ravwoflia Alleloids
- TAX
- Battell
- AMA
- Avalon
- Filter
- special
- cancer
- public
- youth smoking
- FTC
- labeling
- lobbying
- motive/profits
- RICO (Utah Complaint)
- nicotine
- Type
- Report
- Alias
- B&W 0376 LB 0376
- Scruggs 421
- Glantz 1802
- 1802.05
- 2401.14
- MN Exhibit 26170
- Scruggs 421
Document Images
~.~, .,,.,, .. IItPLICATIONS OF BAT'rEI4~ I~PPO
~.~:~,~ detemination ~ ~ttelle of the "truquil~lng" function of "
." .
~..~/.~cot~e, ~ received ~ the ~ system in t~ delivered ~ke of .... " '
.~,;~'~ cig~ettes, ~gether with nicotine's ~ssible effect on obeslty~ .-...
~,::.:.~deltvers ~ the ia~stry w~t well ~y ~ its first effective l~t~- ,-'_~
:~'~:~nt of propa~nd~ counter to that of t~ ~er~c~.~cer ~ciety,
:.~:.~?~,..et ~, ~i~ ci~ettes as ~vlng a c~l relationship
~"" ~ ~,~of the 1~. ~e ~ttelle work is not in ~ degree respo~lve ~ '
,~ ~at ~ndic~ent nor to the ~rt e~cted to ~ re~ed by the
~'~g~n ~neral'e ~ttee on ~ok~ng ~d ~alth. I ~uld ~b~t,
.*~,~~.ho~ever, t~t the ~ff~th f~lter offers the brl~e over ~hlch the
• "~.~,~'~dustry ~ght pass from ~ts present terrain of defen~ to a f~eld
~ .~-..
July 17, 1963
I& II ..
:.,-; .~:~,for effective counter attack using the Battellestudy a~ the basic . .~..'
~; ~. ~:,~:we&pon,~ I will assume for purposes of-this note that the "Grlffith ""/~_
:~:,~,..£11ter' is one which permits filtration to specification; it filters-'. :.,
~ ~:~.,".~ selectlvely, both qualitatively ~nd qu~ntltatlvely.: ~.It c~n deliver -:. ~. -~"
!~,i~~;t~ste and nicotine (and nlcotlne in even more effective form)-free '
,~,~'-~:"~.of constituent #1 to infinity, selectlvely. I grossly overstate and
o~.~ .~" oversi~pllfy Dr Grifflth's claim~ deliberately. • .........
• ..- .... ,~,
'~.,-. .. ..,,-. ,. , , . ., . . • ,. ~ ..... , .
.'~.:~',~. The problem is slmple~ If the angers ~re complex.'. Assume the
,A,~.,-'_~,? " Genera/'s Committee concludes (whatever the jargon of- sclentlflC
.,.,~; '~<~ ;',~.~,~-
~..~. ~nalysls and. to whatever degree speclflc) that there is. real and .,..:;-.~.~.
"."~_~.~,~"'~, c.ompelltng evldence 0fa cw,~sa,1 - or even a ,trongly ':pl:edisposing~.~..~
~..'~_'~.,rel.atten between smoking and cancer...,.CardiovascUl~. ~Lisorders
~.~_~.~::~;h~:~Beport; we must f&cs .the fact that & responsible and qualified-
.~:hav~ (.spoken. " One would suppose we would not repeat Dr. Little's,of~ ..~: ~,~
~.~reiterated ",not proven~. ~e ~ould ~pe the ~s~y ~uld act
~:~f~ti~efy ~d not merely r~t defe~ively, ee aust, I ~i~"~'~::
~-.~T~recogn~e 't~t ~ defe~e of the industry ~d in" preservation 'of
~,:~pre~nt e~n~gs ~sit~on, we must either g) disprove ~he th~ry
~.;~,~?,:cgu~l ~lationship or b) ~s~ver the c~clnogen or ~c~gens~ ~..:~
~.~,~-c~ci~gens, or ~tever, and demo~trate o~ ability.to re~ve. ~'?~
.~.:'-~//-.~r neutr~e them. ~is me~s t~ we ~st emb~k -.~n w~tever" ~.~
... ,. ~ fO~ of org~ation - on ~sslve ~d ~pressively ft~ced
:~' ..,~ the" etiology of c~cer ~ it relates to the use of ~b~co; w~t . ~ ",.
. ....~,~constituents or combi~tion of constl~ents in cig~ette ~oke cause.:-.
,,, ?L" . ..
~.,~ -,. or ~ conducive ~ c~cer of .the lung. Certainly one would ~po .~ .~,..
,.)" ' prove there ~s no et~olog~cal factor ~ ~ke ~t the od~ ~e. ,.~'
-.,~ greatly against ~ocess ~n t~t effort. At the ~st," the probabilities'"
"'.: ....~e t~t ~me comblnat~on_of co~tltuents of smoke will ~ found "'.~ "~-
.~:'".. ~, conducive ~ %h, onset of c~er or ~
.crests, .. en, lroment.
~,.,-hi~.;":~":'.. . ~,-,-" ~',.
c~cer is more ~el~ ~ occur.: ,, . ~ ...:..,..,_.,..,:..:. :.~.. .~ .~.
, , ..... _ .. . : -~ ,,,..
;-~.~,.., , -j,,...~.. ~

-2 -

---

---

---
