Lorillard
Sarah M. Persley, Plaintiff, V. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Defendant. Order Re: Duplicative Filings. Cv 97-2696 Jmi (Rck)
Fields
- Author
- Ideman, J.M.
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT. FILE/BASEMENT GMP
- Type
- PLEA, PLEADING
- Site
- G29
- Request
- R1-080
- Named Person
- Ideman, J.M.
- K, R.C.
- Persley, A.
- Persley, S.M.
- Stdenis, S.
- Document File
- 96773799/96773880/Litigation Sara Guzman V. Philip Morris Court Papers - Volume II
- Date Loaded
- 06 Dec 2001
- Named Organization
- Bw, Brown & Williamson
- Ca
- Usdc Cd Ca
- Litigation
- Feda/Produced
- Author (Organization)
- Usdc Cd Ca
- Characteristic
- EXTR, EXTRA
- Master ID
- 96773800/3879
- 96773800-3879 Index of Pleadings Case Name: Sara Guzman V. Philip Morris Court: Superior Court State of California, San Francisco Case Number: 300200
- 96773802-3803 Sara Guzman, Plaintiffs, V. Phillip Morris Tobacco Company, Defendants. Joint Stipulation to Dismiss Lorillard Tobacco Company, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and Liggett Group, Inc., Without Prejudice. Case No. 300200
- 96773804-3805 Sara Guzman, Plaintiffs, V. Phillip Morris Tobacco Company, Defendants. Proof of Service. Case No. C-99-01797 Mmc
- 96773807-3811 Sara Guzman, Plaintiffs, V. Phillip Morris Tobacco Company, Defendants. Order Denying in Part and Granting in Part Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. No. C-99-071797 Mmc
- 96773812 Erler V. Philip Morris, Et Al.
- 96773813-3827 Nan Erler, Plaintiff, Vs. Phillip Morris Incorporated, Defendant. Order Denying Defendant's Renewed Motion to Dismiss and Granting Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice. Case No. 98cv138
- 96773828-3837 Sara Guzman, Plaintiffs, V. Phillip Morris Tobacco Company, Defendants. Reply Memorandum in Support of Certain Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(C)). Case No. C-99-01797 Mmc
- 96773838-3839 Sara Guzman, Plaintiffs, V. Phillip Morris Tobacco Company, Defendants. Supplemental Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Certain Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(C)). Case No. C-99-01797 Mmc
- 96773841-3854 Betty Jean Myers, Plaintiff, V. Phillip Morris, Inc., Defendants. Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. No. Civ-F-99-5449-Rec-Ljo
- 96773858-3859 Fibreboard Corporation Plaintiffs, V. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Defendants. (Proposed) Order Sustaining Defendants' Demurrers to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint. No. 791919-8
- 96773860-3862 Sara Guzman, Plaintiffs, V. Phillip Morris Tobacco Company, Defendants. Federal Certificate of Service by Hand-Delivery and U.S. Mail. Case No. C-99-01797 Mmc
- 96773863-3864 San Francisco Summer Program
- 96773865-3875 Sara Guzman, Plaintiffs, Vs. Phillip Morris Tobacco Company, Defendants. Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. No. 99 1797 Mmc
- 96773876-3877 Sara Guzman, Plaintiffs, Vs. Phillip Morris Tobacco Company, Defendants. Order Denying Certain Defendants Motion for Judgement on the Pleadings. No. 99 1797 Mmc
- 96773878-3879 Sara Guzman, Plaintiffs, Vs. Phillip Morris Tobacco Company, Defendants. Federal Certificate of Service by U.S. Mail. No. 99 1797 Mmc
Related Documents:
Document Images
i
2
3
4
S
6
plaintiff asserts that a racant asandmsnt to Cal. Civ. Code q
1714.45 which repeals the statutory bar to suits aqainst tobacco
manufacturers applies to her casa. She is aistaksn.
The amendad version of Cal. Civ. Code S 1714.43 did not take
ettsct until January i, 108, sonths aftar this Coart closed
Plaintiff's case. Said amandaant aontains no axprsss dsclaration of
retroactivity, and tharetors can only be applied prospectively. Sss
Cal. Civ. Cods S 1'714.43 (as amended)J tY ili4 Cal. Civ. Cods f 3
('(n]o part of (th. California Civil Code] is retroactivs, unless
expressly so daelarad'). Accordinqly, Plaintiff oan not revive hsr
wrongful death action with this legislative aasndaant.
a.
rn. otri-sf t.W IMI..
The Court has taken pains to aeeoaodats the =p s& Plaintiff in
this case - both becausa she is not represented by counsel and
because of the natura of har claiss. _xonatheless, this Court oaa not
parmit Plaintiff to abusa the judicial process and harass Dafsndant
with any sors frivolous filings.
Thersfors, tIIis court hereby oa11s Plaintiff's attention to Local
Aules 17.9 aad 27&, under which the Co4lrt- fay institute a va%atioqs
litigant peiiay, and to 29 U.S.C. f 1!=q, tmdsr rhieh the Coart.may
imposa sanctions against any party rAo vaxati,aasly saoltipiies
proceedings. Plaintiff is directed to exercise qrsat Cars and
deliberation before filing any future docgasats with this Court.
24
25
24
27
28
ZT S1 so oaDnp.
DdTme February 10, 199s
Jassa x, ttsas
Onited States ®istrict Judge
3

Plaintiff souqht $10 lillion in dasaqcs.
Thia Court grantsd Defsndant's .otion to dississ for failure to
state a clais, pursuaat to Fsd. A. Civ. P. 12(s)(s), an Au4ust 13,
1997. The Court found that Qal. Civ. Coda f 1714.45 qranted tobacco
sanufacturars and ssllars iauaity tses product liability actions.
Qi l.arAe v. Gvana.211~rela. *ne., 14 Cal. 4th fas. 2002 (1997). The
Court disaissad Piaintiff's olaias ritb pre1udias.
On octobar 20, 1997, this Coart heard PLintiff'a Xotion. for
Reconsideration of the Court' au9ust 13, 1997 Order disaissinq
Plaintiff's ease. tindinq that Plaintiff 'aeraly re-alleqe[d] the
arqaYSats which she set forth in opposition to Defandaict's aotion to
disa.iss,' tttis Court denied Plaintiff's aotioa by Order dated October
31, 1997.
On Novasb.r. 17, 1907, Plaintiff filad a aotion for °ra-
reconaideration.' The Court dcnl,ad this action as 'ispropar insofar
as this Court previously denied P1aiAtiffts sotion for reconsideration
on Odtoher 31, 1l97.'
A. rti. saa e..wt es e.t. et.r. eee. e 2'ia.as oea._vet tavi:n
On Jaeua=y 230 1lf7, Plaintiff filed a dewf.at entitled rltaquest
for Judicial ltotiae Plaintiff Sarah Parsley SiqU4sts !or
xaaonsidaratioei artd Relief iraa Court ordar" ('Plaintif!'s Raqusst') .
Plaintiff ssaks to have this Court revisit lts Aova:bar 4, 1997 ddenial
of Plaintiff's tirst sotion for raooosideration. Citisq Cal. Civ.
Coda S 1714.45, P1aiAtiff mtkes the instant raenlast basad on 'the
aserqencs of nav aatarial facts or a chsnqa of lav oeeurriaq after the
tiaa of deeision.' tlaintiff's Request at 1-2.

0 '
lYYTliL01$:~1ICT0~.:. `[T~.-:
9NITED ST7ITES DZBTRICT CopRT
CF1iTPJLL DZSTRIQY 0F CALIlORK211 '
SAPAtY x. PERSbEIIe ; CV 97-2s9i J= (Rdt)
Plaintiff, r o2aLt 1Et oQPLSCar2ei ZSLtXOs
r
v. )
r
BROWK E WSLLIAFLSOK TD8AC00 )
O®RP.,
r
) .
D.rafd.aRt. r
r
12 2s >oDtiiY oRDSitfD7
Tha Court is in raesipt oi a doeaaant liisd by LStil sA Plaintiff
SARltH PatSLEY satitlsd 'RsQsssst for Judicial Kotios Plaintiff Sarah
Perslay Raqu.st !or Rsooasidarttioit and Relief lrroa Court order.` The
Court is also in reosipt of Dslaadust DRXW i iiEfd.iAtt80K 1=8uco0
coAP.'s "oppositioa to'PlsiatilSls (Uird) ltotioa for
Racoasid.ratioa,' aad the dsalaration of Snsaa St. D.nis in snpport
sls.raoS.
'PlaintilF Parslty lilad h.r tirst Cofplaiat in this action oss
April la, 1997. Pltinti!f allaqad that Datandaat Erovn ti williamson
Tobaooo Corpe e thrott4)+ its tobaooo produCts, vs'oA4lqlly oausW tha
dsath of P1aiAtilt~s hasbaad Arthur Parslsye ~~~ in 11ti4s+t 1996.
0.1
C:c
C}'i
U1
EXHIBIT B
