Jump to:

Lorillard

John G. Allman, Plaintiffs, Vs. Philip Morris, Inc., Defendants. Civ. Case No. 94-0504-Ieg (Cm) Class Action. Larry Allan Higley, Plaintiffs, Vs. Philip Morris, Inc., Defendants. Civ. Case No. 94-0510-E(Ajb). Class Action. Stipulation and Order Regarding Case Management Issues

Date: 27 Apr 1994 (est.)
Length: 7 pages
92385610-92385616
Jump To Images
snapshot_lor 92385610-92385616

Fields

Author
Berman, S.W.
Cauley, S.E.
Coughlin, P.J.
Friedman, A.S.
Gonzalez, I.E.
Healey, C.J.
Hynes, P.
Mansfield, A.M.
Steiner, R.G.
Weinberger, R.D.
Weiss, M.I.
Yates, A.G., J.R.
Area
LEGAL DEPT FILE ROOM/LATERAL FILES
Alias
92385610/92385616
Type
PLEA, PLEADING
Named Organization
Amer, American Tobacco
Batus Tobacco Services
Brooke Group
Bw, Brown & Williamson
Ctr, Council for Tobacco Research
Hill Knowlton
Lig, Liggett
Lm, Liggett & Myers
Loews
PM, Philip Morris
RJR Nabisco
RJR, R.J.Reynolds
San Diego Superior Court
TI, Tobacco Inst
US Tobacco
Ust
Usdc Sd Ca
Named Person
Allman, J.G.
Cauley, C.R.
Cordova
Gosling, T.R.
Higley, L.A.
Kiessel, C.
Document File
92385597/92385759/Litigation Re: Higley V. P.M., Et Al Court Papers@ 92385598/92385758/Litigation Re: Higley V. P.M., Et Al Court Papers
Date Loaded
05 Jun 1998
Request
R1-004
Litigation
Stmn/Produced
Author (Organization)
Ctr, Council for Tobacco Research
Hagens Berman
Hill Knowlton
Lig, Liggett
Lm, Liggett & Myers
Loews
Lor, Lorillard
Luce Forward
Milberg Weiss
PM, Philip Morris
RJR Nabisco
RJR, R.J.Reynolds
TI, Tobacco Inst
US Tobacco
Usdc Sd Ca
Ust
Wright Bonds
Alfred G Yates + Associates
Amer, American Tobacco
Batus Tobacco Services
Bonnett Fairbourn
Brooke Group
Bw, Brown & Williamson
Characteristic
MARG, MARGINALIA
Master ID
92385609/5616

Related Documents:
Site
N14
UCSF Legacy ID
lur50e00

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: lur50e00
SmMa y: 4. 1994 2;47PM SHOOK RIAIRDY & BA'GON', i 2 3 5 6 e 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ..,.,....N o. 2 9 2'1' ---p. 3/9 -. V=TED STITES DISTRICT COURT JOM G.ALLUyt, T• R0M1LD GOSLING) and CLAIIDI]l. IiCZESSEL, . Oa Behalf of ) Tbemsalves -aiad 1111 Otbars ) Similarly situated, ) ~ plairstitts, ) ) va. ) ) PsLL" MoMts, tNc. , PSiLIp ) ) -MoMss 'cOWANISS, rxC. , -ssoosE GSODr, LZ'D:, .-LIGGm-GA0vP, IxC., ) L~IG~G~~~'~i'v3~~ i71D1[Y53~ TGBACCO_CA., ) /reii.iiiV~i~ tMMS, iaC. ,TI`...'. ]USRT~G~I~T TO~Bii~J 7ICCC COW1~NY, Ig~C. , ) R.J. i~i~ia~il +v3MwrOCQ. , /= ) NABISCO, INC. , tTST, IliC. , Q. S. ) TOBACCO Co ., HATQS, INC •, 8Ao9oN 19) ) VILLM.,OWT+QH7lCCO C03tP . ,Iam 'CORPOBSTION, TOEJICCO ) 'CD. . K=Lt, i WQiQLTCN, INC. , ) "TOMACCO I+iSTZTOT4, INC. , and ) "CODiNCn FOg-TQHACCaO * RFSEA&CS, ) Defsndanta. ) IMY JIZSM HZGLYY atid CARQLYbT R. ) Civ. Caaa No. `CAyi;EY, On'Bahalf of 'Thamselves and AU C?th=s Sfailarly ) ) 94-o3io-g,*~Ja, 8itvatad, ) « .= ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ~ 'PSIZ.IP NoRB= , INC. , PBILIP .KORRIS CO~AiTIF.B r INC., EitOGEE ) ) . i t , GiGODP, L'1'D: , LZGGSIT GROIIP, INC. , ) LZG4E'iT ]U1'D 1lYSSS TOBACCO CD.. ) A30=CAN SRaitiDS, INC., T3HE ) AXttGN TOBhCCO CoCPAIsY, nrC., R.s. AsuxoWS TOBACCO CO., &JR y ) -o ra jDIBISCO, INC. , IIST, INC. , II. S. 1 'TO9ACCD CO. , DATQ9, a'iC. , SROfilbt it) w N WILW-lYQON TGBACC4 COitP., IAVS.S `G~iii1TIQ1[I *I+aitIlJAiiD TQSACCO ~ ) o+ r 0 .. Co• , 8= & XROTiTLTaK, INC., "TOBACCO IXSTITOTE, I2tC• , and f ) COUNCIL FOR' TOBACCO R'gS$ARCS, I ) nelenaanta~ ) ORIGiNAL
Page 2: lur50e00
S~tT Ma:y, 4. 19S4 2: 47PM SHOOK HARDY & PnCON'; "~1C1Gf :. „ No.2927.."F, 4/9 STTP .~TI N&M ORDSR AWOING CASE 1!!_aN1yG1= ISM= 2 Plaintiffs John G. allman, T. Ronald Gosliaq and 3 Claudia Tiessel, Larry lilian Higley and Carolyn R. Cauley 4 (Maiotitfs•) and defendants Liqqett Group InC., Philip Xorris 5 Yx:eorporatsd, The Ameriean Tobacco Coaapatsy, R. J. Reynolds 6 Tobacco Co., Qnited Stataa To bacco Company, Browsa & williamson 7 Tobaaco Corp., Lorillard Tobacco Company, Still i Ynowltozt, Smc. , 8 . Ths Tobacco IAStitZita, IIlc. , amd The Council for Tobacco Research 9 - VSk, Inc. (•Defez:dants'1, hereby stipulate as follows: 10 1. Within t,et: (10) days of the exQcutior: of this ordez, 11 Plaintiffs vill dismiss vithout prejudfca the folloirinq entities 12 froY the above-captioned caeas: PIiILIP KoRRIS COKPAIZBBS, INC. , 13 "HRO= GRGLTP, LT'D. , LIGG$TT aiID XYEi9 I'OHACCO CCti. , 11XF.RICM ... ' ' 14 . BitANDBI IlTC. 1 RJjt NABISCO, I3iC.1 C~'iT, TJi'C., BATQS, INC. a=Id ZAiPES 15 Esic), CORPOWIaDI (collectively, the "Dismissad Det.ndants"). 16 'Within ten (1G) days of execution of this orde=,. Plaintiffs and 17 the Dismissed Defendants vill axecute mutually acceptable tolling 18 agreements which viT,l expire eighteen (1s )months; €rova the date 19 this order is executed. The tollSaq agreements will not affect ~. 20 any `tatute- of lisitatian or other de=.nae that existed as of tb 21 date tha &LIM vomplaint Yas filed. 22 2. Plaintiffs vill file and serve an amartd4d cosplaint in 23 ALbM vhieh adds the icle . plaintiffs arld any additional named 24 plaintiffs to &LIM on or before 3tiprfl 29, 1994. Dataadants' 2.5 counsel aFee to accept service of the amar,ded complaint. The 28 ]I-tSjjsy complaint will thereafter be dississad. Defendants tiill 27 hsve uatil 3uly 15, 1994 to answer, move or othervisa respond to 24 the amended coaplaint in A11=13. 1 9238S612
Page 3: lur50e00
SENf Hi~a,y. 4. 1994 2:~4~7PM SH00K, H'R~DY &~ DUNi'; ~ 2 3 4 5 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 i8 19 W 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 _U161 'to 2927'1'a~P. 5/9: a-' z 3. Any additional plaintilfs vho are repras.nt.d by counsel in &LUM or Ria ev who assert the saae cla3,as as the ~ plaintiffs in AJ= or xi=, vill be added by aa4ndmmt to the &JIM eoaiplaint as additl clacs sepresantitives. Any additional counsel for such plaintiffs will enter appezraaces in ALUM. Mis provision vill not preclude the addinq of additional plaintiffs in aJIM on or befora 3uly 15, 1994. 4. In the avant Defendants file a motion to disaiss, and . aubject to the Gourt's calendar. the briefing schedule for tha motioA to dismiss is as follows: Notion Filad and served Jtvly 15, 1994 opposition Filed and served August 13, 1994 Aeply filed and served septaab4r s, 1994 r .~ . 84aritw Segtsmb4= 19, 1994 ,• . :. 5. Tte-partiea'agrsa that the discovery produc.d ita•dsta "in the action, CerdQ v. lr.iaaett _ Grotm et al, Sai1 DiQgo S06Tior - f. Court Case No. 651824 shall be da8msd to Constitute discovery applicablo in &Umu, auhjoct to the tsrs of all lattar agreemeats, stipulatfons and protective orders agreed to and/or entered in tte .=daya action. Plaintiffs vill not : ~ ' .' r~ ' N otba~cvis: seek to repeat that dl~scovary in ~. Piaittti~ts '~ will aot eircuz•rsat this agraesvent by seeXing discovery ia CR Q=dWM that is not relevant to the allegations raised in N QwAm. At the saas tim+s, however, discovery in 92 ~,ffi ongoing and nothing in this agrsoaant precludes Plaintiffs f=oa seeking a fur taer agreement froa Datorsdaats or moving the Court that futurs discovery received in CardQVa be deeaed applicabla to g11M. sy this agraem4nt. Defendants do not waive any objection 2
Page 4: lur50e00
BnVT M4. 19'94 2.48PM SHOOK HIRDY & BAGON I 2 3 4 8 7 a 9 10 t5 1s 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 21 --UirsioN o. 2 9 2 7~*.'zP. 6/91 c. D as to the adaissibility of such discovery in any proceeding or at trial. 6. TArouqti October l, I994, discovery in AIIM'Yin be limited to Plaintiffs' receipt of the ov doc~aDts and the service of requests tor, but not the taking of, any third party discovery. After Octo]aer L, 1994 and pandinq a decision by the 'Court on class csrti=icatioa, discovery in ALZmn will be l,iaitad M .. ~ .. s:. 'to Deta,ndants' discovery related to certification issues and the takinq of thi:td party discovery. A11 parties reserve all rights and objoctions, including any objectioies to class certification or third party discovery. 7. lfie parties agree to the following discovery and 'briefing schedule for class certiPication issues: plsintitts• sotion served J111y 15, 1994 Dsteadantsf discovery Commeaces on the date the Conz* issues a final docision vhich orders Datendanta to at3sVar tbs eovpl.zfnt. (*necision Data*). Datazi4ants' discovery stsst be complated within 60 days of the Decision Date. Plaiatitts" aotion filed On Septsiaber 19, 1994 or tbe Decision Date, vhichevar is later. Defandants' opposftiob Filed and served 90 days from the Decision Date. Plairltitts' reply Siked and served 111 days from tbe Decision Date. Searirnq date To be sst by Court. 8. Each party and tha Dismissed Date.odasita will praserw ., its documants which are relevant to the claims in A11,= durinc . ~ the psndency of the litigation. ~ N 4a ~ o+ ~ w 3
Page 5: lur50e00
-inT Mar: 4. 1994! 2:48PM' Su^~K HARDY & BACONa; Nu. 2927 ~P. ?/9 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 19 20 21 22 23 24. 25 26 27 .'DATED: Apri11994 9. DTo party vill move to transfer these cas.s to a district other than the Southero District of Calitornia. Without prejudice to any right or objsction, including without lisitation, obj'eetions as to ju,aisdiction, the parties .gr.e that -venue in these cases is appropriate in the Southern District of California. Nothing stated herein shall prealuda any party fram as8ertinq any position vith raspect to any motion hrought by any third party in any district. 10. The parties reserve all rights, defenses and objections, including vithout limitation, the right to request 'moditication of the schedule set forth herein for good cause shovn. ."PR+OVED AI3 To FoRK 3n CONTENT: 1II+5MG flB;ISS SERSBAD BY][ES & LER1CH PATBIt:R J. COIIGHLIN Ai"- K. MUFtBLD RANDI D. WIMC82RGIIZ 600 West Broadvay,fiuite 1500 San Diaqo, Ca 92101 TQlephone: 619/Z31-105a 14ILBE= NBISS B$ASH7lD 8YI'i85 ic LEtLMM MBLYYN Z. 1PSIaS PATRICIA AYMS Ooe Pennsylvania Plaza New York, ,TY 10119-0165 Talepb=4: 212/594-5300 BODt717~`iT, F~BOVStK, pAIBD1~lR, SIffir=, xNER & FAY, P. C. Jh1iDR8W S. tX33MK1N 4041 N. Central AvenUa Slzits 1100 Phoenix, AZ 65012-3311 Telephone: 602/274-1100 4
Page 6: lur50e00
. SmM_a_y. 4. 1 994 2:48PM SHOOk HARDY & BAGOY•; 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 DAT3'rD: 1lpril ~?-_ 1994 14 ~ 15 18 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 rf~ 28 -4,010'No.2927".,,..P 8/9 71Li'83D G. YATZS, JR . i u.F= 6 . Y3tiTES , JR. 519 Alleqher:y Suildit:q 429 Forbea Avenue pittabargh, PA 15219 Telephorts: 412/391-5164 IUIGERS ic BEiM 3TEVEli yT. 8P.f00x 1301 Fittn AvelYUo 8uit,a 2929 Se,attle, iSl 95101 Telephone: 206/623-7Z92 WRIGHT i BONDS STEPSE'X $. CAULEY 212 Center Street Centre Piaee, Suits 900 Little RaC1C, AA 72201 Telephone: 501/376-2500 Attmrnaya for Plaintiffs LL1CE, PdMURD, HmV=09 & SCiIPpS RGSgRT G. MIM CmaSTOPHZR s:w'xaAm Attorney for Delendant TSY AM=CAbt TC87lCC0 CMA91Y' and authorised to anter into thfs Stipulation on behalf of defendants LIGGBTT OOtiP IIQC. , PSTLIP liGjiR2S ZITODItPO~iiTSD, R. s. RSYN=S TOBACCO 00. 82ATLS TOBACCO CO"AmY, 83iOMN a LA T4$A= CD"., T,BgTT?1RD TOBACCO C0mp"Y, RILL 6• XXGifJ.TOxr IYC., THS TO89.CCO ZliSTITQI3, INC. , AM TS$ CCUliCI7L FOA TOBACCO RF.SB.A= ~ U!", IXC. , PSIISP lioMtl5 CMPIIXIFS, IItC., SAr001CZ G~OL~P, LTD. , LIGGETT JViD X7t23tii TC8i1CC0 C0. ; Awm=CAW m1135, ZNC. , RJA NUISCO. I1tC. , IIST, I7fC. , 9=8 TOBACCO 89ZnC8s, IHC., and LOEi19 CORPOItATION ~o N ~ Cn o0 m C4 5
Page 7: lur50e00
4. 1994 2:48PM SHOOK HARDY & B'AGON~ Q$ja'Ffl 3 4 6 ? 9 10 11 12 13 27 2B -9lsr'o4`No. 292'7""P. 9/9~" ' ~~ CaSa sigm'.ur0 Pa4~= ~ i,pul,atiaa~~asA lord•r~ iD ~ ~ac~°a~erat I 9'-0504-IE~ (C~t~ and -~... ~ v~. S: = Diat: Court Gasa' No. Dist. Court Cas4 lta. 94- ' OSlO-S~]~i.TB~ „ 6

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: