Lorillard
Voter / Consumer Research Nyc Smoking Restrictions Topline Results
Fields
- Alias
- 92103110/92103117
- Type
- REPT, OTHER REPORT
- QUES, QUESTIONNAIRE
- Area
- SIMEONIDIS,NICK/LATERAL FILES
- Site
- N102
- Named Person
- Glullani, R.
- Request
- R1-037
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- Named Organization
- Ny City Council
- Author (Organization)
- Voter Consumer Research
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Master ID
- 92102551/3120
- 92102552 Facsimile Form
- 92102555-2559 Testimony of the Hotel Association of New York City Before the New York City Council
- 92102567 Fax Cover Sheet
- 92102568 Patents Granted to or Licensed to Lorillard From 850101 to 940112
- 92102569-2570 Untitled Document 92102569/2570
- 92102571
- 92102607
- 92102608
- 92102613
- 92102620
- 92102621
- 92102625 Kathy Ireland Contract
- 92102642 Telecopier Message
- 92102643-2674 Int. No 232 A A Local Law to Amend the Administrative Code of the City of New York, in Relation to Smoking.
- 92102683 Facsimile Transmittal
- 92102684 Antitrust Civil Investigative Demand No. 10987
- 92102687 Untitled Document 92102687
- 92102688-2689 Why Californians Should Vote Yes on Prop 188
- 92102690-2691 California Prop 188
- 92102692-2696 Proposition 188 Q & A
- 92102897-2898 Brown & Williamson Cid Production
- 92102914 Facsimile Transmittal
- 92102915-2916 Brown & Williamson Cid Production
- 92102924 Telecopier Message From the Tobacco Institute
- 92102925 Arizona Legal Analysis
- 92102926-2935 Arizona Results / 000800 Survey
- 92102940 Fax Cover Sheet
- 92102955 Nyc Conference Call
- 92103002 Nyc Conference Call
- 92103020-3022
- 92103029 Facsimile Transmittal
- 92103030-3032 Antitrust Civil Investigative Demand No. 10987
- 92103036 Telecopier Message
- 92103037-3038 Grassroots New York City
- 92103052-3055 Ets Facts Special Issue
- 92103056 Background Information the Survey of the Science Advisory Board of the Center for Indoor Air Research by Majority Staff, Health and the Environment Subcommittee, Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives
- 92103058-3060 940000 Research Agenda Request for Applications
- 92103061-3062 Survey on the Health Effects of Environmental Tobacco Smoke
- 92103063 Survey of Ciar Science Advisory Board
- 92103064 Smoke & Mirrors: Epa Wages War on Cigarettes If We Said It, You Might Not Believe It.
- 92103065 Smoke & Mirrors: Epa Wages War on Cigarettes Secondhand Smoke: How Much Are Non-Smokers Exposed to?
- 92103066-3067 Were You Misled? Today, Read Another Side of the Story About Secondhand Smoke.
- 92103075 Telecopier Message
- 92103076 New York City - Points on Smoke-Free Air Act
- 92103077-3088 Points on Smoke-Free Air Act
- 92103089 Telecopier Message
- 92103090-3091 A Smoke-Free Society in A Free Society? the Case Against Smoking Bans
- 92103092 Telecopier Message
- 92103093
- 92103094-3095 A Smoke-Free Society in A Free Society? the Case Against Smoking Bans
- 92103104 Massachusetts Medicaid Legislation
- 92103105-3107
- 92103108 Telecopier Message
- 92103109 New York City Pre-Test Polling Results
- 92103119 Civil Investigative Demand 10987
Related Documents:
Document Images
Voter t Consumer Research
NYC Srnokhtig Restrictions
Topline Results
Helto, I'm from Voter I Consumer Research, a national survey research
company. We'ra doing a public opinion survey in your area. I need to speak with the
; youngest (rnalelfemale) available now who is 18 years old or older. This person must
I be registered to vote at thie address
QA. Thinking about last year's elections for Mayor and City Council, did you vote in
these elections last November, or did you rsot have a chance to go and vote? (IF DID
NOT VOTE, A3K.) Is there another registered voter available right now? (IF YES,
REPEAT QUESTION, IF NO, TERMINATE)
1 Voted (CONTINUE)
2 Did not vote (TERMINATE)
01.
02.
3 Don't know (TERMINATE)
4 Refused (TERMINATE)
Do you feel things In part of New York City are going In the right direatlon, or do you
feel things have pretty serlously gotten off on the wrong track?
t Right direotion 41
2 Wrong track 38
3 Don't know 22
4 Refused -
Do you have a fevorable or unfavorable impression of Rudolph Gluliani?
I Favorable 52
2 Unfavorable 30
3 No impression / no opinion (VOLUNTEERED) 13
4 Not aware I not familiar with the name (VaL) .
5 Don't know 4
8 Refused 1
C)
20'd 900'oN 2I:Z b6,1i l(lr TILZ-998-008:QI ajnjtjsul oaaEqol ayl

Votr / Consumer Research " Page -2-
Toplin. Results VCR6d48 / NYC
03. One issue I would fike to ask you about is smoking in public places. As of today, what
is your feeling about restrictions on smoking in public plaoes -- would you say that
currently restrictions on smoking in public place® oro too strict, are about right or are
not strict enou9h?
1 Too strict 20
2 About right 30'
3 Not strict enough 41
4 Don't know 3
6 Refuaed °
Let me aek you about some of the reetrictRons on smoking that are in effect in New
York City today. Please tell me for each of these whether you feei theee regulations
are too restrictive, about right or whether smoking there should be further restricted.
04. Under current law, restaurants must have a non-smoking section large enough to seat
elf non-smoking customers. (PROMPT IF NECESSARY:) Do you feel this Is too
reatrktlve, about right, or should emoking be further reetricted?
Q,6,
I Too restrictive 4
2 About right es
3 Need further reetriotions 29
4 Don't know 1
6 Refused ;
Currently, non-smoking employees have a right to work In smoke-free areas. (PROMPT
IF NECESSARY:) Do you feel this in Too restriativa, about right, or should smoking be
further restricted?
1 Too reatriotive 3
2 About right s8
3 Need further restriotione 21
4 Don't know 3
6 Refused ~
b0'd 900'oN bI:Z b6.IT -i(lf IILL-998-008:QI . aln1ti.sul oooPqol aql

Voter / Consumer Research Page -3-
Toplln. Rsulhs VCRea4e / NYC
Qe. As a general rule, wh®t do you think New York City's policy on smoking in public
places should be -- (ROTATE 1- 3)
1 A complete ban on smoking anywhere non-amokera
may be present 28
2 Limit smoking to designated smoking areas 83
3 Smoking in public places should not be restricted 9
4 Don't know 1
a Refused
People have proposed a number of further restrictions to be placed on smoking in
public plaoes. I would like to tead you a number of these proposals, and ask you for
each one whether you strongly favor, vomewhet favor, somewhat oppose or strongly
oppose each one. (RANDOMIZE Q07 - 008)
07. Banning the sale of cigarettes and making smoking completely lilegel
1 Strongly favor 17
2 Somewhat favor 8
3 Somewhat oppose 23
4 Strongly oppose 60
6 Don't know 5
8 Refused -
n8. Abolishin9 separate smoking / no smoking
all public places
araas and completely bannin9 smoking In
1 Strongly favor 34
2 Somewhat favor 15
3 Somewhat oppose 17
4 Strongly oppose 31
5
C Don't know
Refused 3
S0'd 900' oN t-rT:Z
b6. II 'i(lr IILZ-998-008:QI a-~n}tisul 0o32q01 a4i

Yoter I Consumer Rese.rch PaQe -4-
Topr4+. R..utta YCR8448 / NYC
aS. Under current law rsstaurants have to have smoking and non-smoking sections. Wouid
you favor or oppose a proposal to force restaurants to have a separate enclosed room
for smokers with a separate ventilation syetom. (IF ANSWERED ASK:) And do you feei
strongly ebout that?
1 Strongly favor 64
2 Somewhat favor 18
3 Somewhat oppose 8
4 Strongly oppose 17
5 Don't know 1
® Refused .
n10. Under current law, smoking in the workplace is allowed only when all employeee agree
to it. Would you favor or oppose a new proposal to restricting smoking in the
workplace to nrie enclosed room on each floor with a separate ventilation system. (If
ANSWERED ASK:) And do you feet strongly about that?
1 Strongly favor 54
2 Somewhat favor 21
3 Somewhat oppose 8
4 Strongly oppose 16
6 Don't know 4
6 Refused -
011. The new proposals to reatrict smoking tn public places that I mentioned would
effectively ban smoking in these public places because the requirements are very
expensive arrd difficult to Implement and it will be easier and oheaper for restaurants
and workpiaces to ban smoking entirely. In view of this, do you support the new
restriotions being proposed or do you feel these now restrictions are going too far?
1 Support new restrictions 48
2 New restrictions are going too far 46
3 Don't know
4 Refused
6
90'd 900'oN bT:Z M1T -inr IIZZ-998-008:QI ajna.Tjsul o33Pqol ayy

voter / Conaum4r Rt.eerch
Toplh» Rs.ult.
PaBe -6-
VCR9rd8JNYC
Q.12. Ale:, current non-smoking requirements in New York City are already among the
toughest in this country. The naw proposals would make amoking restrictlons in Nsw
York the toughest restrictions short of a complete bon. Again, in view of this, do you
support the naw restrictions being proposed or do you feel these new restrietions are
going too fer7
1 Support r>dvr restrictions 63
2 New restrictions are going too far 42
3 Don't know 6
4 Refused '
For each of the following statements, please tell me whether you strongly agree,
somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or strongly dieagree with that particular
statement. (RANDOMIZE Q13 - Q16)
013. Employers should be allowed to set aeide separate smoking areas, as long as all
employees working In the area agree.
I Strongly agree 54
2 Somewhat agree 27
3 Somewhat disagree 5
4 Strongly disagres 13
6 Don't know 1
S Refused -
014. Smokinq should be allowed In enclosed private off(ces.
1 Strongly agree 37
2 Somewhat agree 23
3 Somewhat disagree g
4 Strongly disagree 27
5 Don't know 4
.
8 Refused
ZO' d 900' oN SI : Z tr6.I I ~f1I' I IZZ-998-008: QI ajna. tTsul ooo>?qol ayl

"~ Votr / Con.urrar Raaeerch Aepe -e-
Toplfn. R..uR. VCR9"8 / NYC
Q16. Smoking should be allowed in restaurants as long as thera is enough ventilation to
make surs that non-smoking customers aren't bothered.
1 Strongly agree 51
2 Somewhet agree 19
3 Somewhat disagree 8
4 Strongly disagree 23
5 Don't know 1
0 Refused -
016. Changing the subjeot s little bit in oiootiona for office candidates positions on a number
of different issues. In eieotione for offices like mayor and city oounoii member of New
York City, which of the following issues is most important in making up your mind
which candidate to vote for (ROTATE 1 - 6)
Q17.
1 Their position on tax Increases S
2 Their position on balancing the city budget 13
3 Thelr position on New York's pubEic schools 23
d Their position on crime 48
5 Their position on smoking restrictions 3
8 Other (VOLUNTEERED) 2
7 Don't know 3
8 Refused +
And of this same Ilst, which issue Is second most Important? (RANDOMIZE REMAINING
ITEMS)
I Their position on tax increases 18
2 Their position on balancing the city budget 19
3 Their position on New York's pubtio schools 29
4 Their position on crime 28
5 Their position on antoking restrictions 3
0 No second mention (VOLUNTEERED) 2
7 Don't know 1
8 Refused
80'd 900'oN ST:Z b6,II Inr IILZ-998-008:QI a1na.t1sul OjoEq01 ayl
-~

Vota ! Conaumer Rer+earoh P.gs -T-
TopIlM Rosufts YCR9d4e / NVC
Q18. And would you be very likely to vote for, somewhat likely to vote for, somewhat likely
to vote egeinst or very likely to vote against a candidate for office who took the
position that current restrictions on srnoking in public plaoea are adequate and no
further restrictions are needed - if the iseue doesn't much matter to you, just say so.
1 Very likely to vote for 15
2 Somewhat likely to vote for 14
3 Somewhat likely to vote againet 8
4 Very likely to vote aQainst 11
6 Doesn't matter (VOLUNTEERED) 43
e Don't know 8
7 Refused
Now, just a few rrwre guestions for statisticef purposes ....
C119. Are you registered to vote as a Republican, a Democrat, or something else?
1 Republican 20
2 Democrat 97
3 Indepsndent 7
4 Other 3
b Don't know 2
0 Refused 2
QZ0. On political (ssues, do you consider vouraeff very liberai, somewhat liberal, somewhat
conservative, or very conservative? (READ CHOICES 1,2,4,AND S! ALTERNATE TOP
TO BOTTOM, BOTTOM TO TOP)
1 Very liberal 13
2 Somewhat liberal I Moro liberal than ooneorvative 33
3 Moderate (DO NOT READ) Q
4 Somewhat conservative / More conservative than liberai 31
5 Very conservative 12
0 Don't know 4
7 Refussd I
(0
N
~
O
GJ
~
~
a)
60'd 900'ON SI:Z
b6 , I I -inr
IIZL-998-008:QI aa.na.t}suI oooEqol ayl

Voter ! Consumer Rseeeroh P+ge -9-
Topllne Results VCR9448 ! NYC
C21. Are you yourself a smoker, a former smoker or have you never smokad?
I Smoker 22
2 Former amoker 33
3 Non-smoker 46
4 Don't know
5 Refused
a22, What is your approximate age?
1 18-24yeara 7
2 26-34yeara 23
3 35 - 44 years 20
4 45 - 54 yeara 18
5 56 - 84 years 12
d OB and over 1 S
7 Refused 2
(123. Are you, yourself, of Hispanio or I.atino descent for example, Mexiaen, or Puerto
Rican, or Cuban, or -- or are you not?
I Yee {GO TO 425} 17
2 No (GO TO 0,241 82
Not sure (GO TO C.24)
Refused (GO TO 024)
n24. (ASK IF (123 = 2 OR 3 OR 4:} Is your raoial or oth-lio heritege white, black, aeiatio,
or what?
1 White 52
2 Black 28
3 Asiatic 1
4 Other 1
5 Refused 1
025. Sex (BY OBSERVATION)
I Male 47
2 i=emale 53
900' oN 9T: Z b6. TT -lnr TILL-998-008: QI a-+n1.tqSUI oo3Qqnj aqi
