Jump to:

Lorillard

Philip Morris U.S.A. Today Issued the Following Statement

Date: 10 Aug 1995
Length: 3 pages
89278481-89278483
Jump To Images
snapshot_lor 89278481-89278483

Fields

Area
SPEARS,ALEXANDER/OFFICE
Alias
89278481/89278483
Document File
89278327/89278506/Briefing Book the Food and Drug
Administration and Tobacco Regulation the Tobacco
Institute 950900
Type
PRES, PRESS RELEASE
Litigation
Iwoh/Produced
Characteristic
EXTR, EXTRA
Site
G65
Named Organization
FDA, Food and Drug Administration
PM, Philip Morris
Usdc Middle District NC
Author (Organization)
PM, Philip Morris
Named Person
Clinton
Kessler, D.
Master ID
89278328/8505

Related Documents:
Date Loaded
12 Feb 1999
UCSF Legacy ID
ist20e00

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: ist20e00
August 10, 1995 CONTACT: (212) 907-5830 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE PHILIP MORRIS U.S.A. TODAY ISSUED THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT: Today Philip Morris U.S.A. joined the four other major U.S. cigarette manufacturers and an advertising firm in filing suit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina in order to stop the Food and Drug Administration from proceeding on a course of action that clearly is illegal. Philip Morris U.S.A. is the domestic tobacco subsidiary of Philip Morris Companies Inc. The suit follows FDA Commissioner David Kessler's releasE3 of proposed regulations governing cigarettes. The regulations are based on President Clinton's decision to allow FDA to assert jurisdicfion over cigarettes under a fede ral law that gives him power to regulate medicines, medical devices and pharrnaceutical products. The purported justification for FDA regulations is to prevent minors from smoking. - Ori the issueE of youth smoking, we share a common goal with all Americans: minors should not smoke and should not have access to cigarettes. We support a number of steps, both voluntary and legislative, that will make a real difference on this issue. We will fight against the idea that the FDA is the right way to make a difference on youth smoking. We will fight just as vigorously for our alternative program, which combines state level regulation andienfon:ement with voluntary efforts to make a real impact an this critical social issue. Having opted to pursue more federal regulation, the Administration has ensured that the more effective and expedient course of cooperative ac:tion takes second place to those who want to expand the federal bureaucracy and its unwanted intrusion into the private lives of adult Americans. The Administration's decision is ail the more trout:.ng in light of the fact that Philip Morris, several weeks ago, committed itself to a comprehE:nsive program, Action Against Access, designed to prevent kids from obtaining c:igarettes by any legal means. Once all the elements are implemented, the result WILL be a retail 1
Page 2: ist20e00
environment where it should only be possible to purchase ci garettes when proof of age can be checked in person. Just this week, the first packs and.cartons of Philip Morris U.S.A. cigarettes came off the manufacturirng lirre bearing the new notice: "Underage Sale Prohibited." Philip Morrig U.S.A. has already discontinued free cigarette sampling to consumers and distriizutiarr of cigarettes through the mail in the United States. Philip Morris U.S.A. is implementing programs to deny merchandising benefits and participation in our retail incentive programs to stores fined for or convicted of selling cigarettes to mirrors.. We are working to place minimum agei of purchase signage in over 200,QM retail autiets around the country, and we are working on education and compliance seminars for retailers and law enforcement officials. We also are beefing up our already aggressive efforts to prevent the use of our cigarette brand names or logos on any item marketed to minors, including video games and toys. These are actions we have been able to undertake on our own. Working with retailers, state policy makers, law enforcement officials and others throughout the United States, we are committed to the enactment of reasonable state legislation to license all retailers who sell cigarettes, accompanied by enforcement mechanisms, notification procedures and strong sanctions for violations. We are also supporting enactment of state IegislatiorT to prevent purchase of cigarettes by minors from vending machines, state legislation to ensure that all cigarettes at retail are in sight of or under the control of a sales clerk and the mandatory posting of minimum age- signage. These are among the ways to deal with the challenge of youth smoking without creating thethneat ta personal liberty and the affront to common sense that the FDA regulation woukt create.. The stated goal of preventing youth smoking is a laudable one - but it does not justify Commissioner Kessler's decision to defy 80 years of clearly stated FDA and Congressional policy. - If the goal is to prevent the sale of cigarettes to minors, we believe common-sense approaches will work best. As we said when we announced our program on youth 2
Page 3: ist20e00
access, the best way to keep kids away from cigarettes is to keep cigarettes away from kids. This lawsuit is = about youth smoking. We believe this lavrsuit is our only option in the face of an illegal action that, if successful, even Commissioner Kessler has admitted could lay the groundwork for far more radical action in the future -- action that could ultimately lead to more severe restrictions or a ban on the sale of cigarettes to adults. ### 3

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: