Tobacco Documents Online

Demographic Comparison of Knoxville to Cities 2-6 Environment Knoxville El Cities 2-6 SJS S/NS NS/S NS/NS Environment (Home/Work) S = Smoking IVS = Non-smoking This document contains data of a preliminary nature and is subject to revision and correction oVez4zse

3 Demographic Comparison of Knoxville to Cities 2-6. Sex Sex ~ ~ This document contains data of a preliminary nature and is subject to revision and correction tVazLzse F `~' « - Z

Demographic Comparison of Knoxville to Cities 2-6. Race 2 N rr 2 Race This document contains data of a preliminary nature and is subject to revision and correction zfiez4zse

Demographic Comparison of Knoxville to Cities 2-6, Ag e This document contains data of a preliminary nature and is subject to revision and correction E~BZ~z69 F ~ ~ Lf

Demographic Comparison of Knoxville to Cities 2-6 Education 60 50 ~ 40 c w ~ 30 a. 20 10 0 Knoxville ~ Cities 2-6 O GJ ~ °115v , q C~~~ao ° °~Q\o G ~ av a, ~° 4 ° 5 Co~ Education This document contains data of a preliminary nature and is subject to revision and correction

Demographic Comparison of Knoxville to Cities 2-6, , Household Income Household Income This document contains data of a preliminary nature and is subject to revision and correction S~BZl.,z69 ~ictv:~e ~ h

1993 CIAR Air Quatity Study 9fi?z4z68 Particle Phase Results City 1 Knoxville, TN

1993 CIAR Air Quality Study Vapor Phase Results City I Knoxville j TN m m A ~~~z~zse

Interim Report No. 1 DETERMINATION OF HUMAN EXPOSURE TO ENVIRONMdrNTAL TOBACCO SMOKE Initial Summary of City No. 1 Dati Roger A. Jenkins, Ph.D. and Michael R. Guerin, Ph.D. Co-Principal Investigators Primary Contributors: Andi Palausky' Amy B. Dindal' Charles K. Bayne, Ph.D.2 Richard W. Counts, Ph.D? 'Chemical and Analytical Sciences Dirision ZComputing Applications Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory November 5, 1993 To: Dr. Max Eisenberg Executive Director Center for Indoor Air Research 1099 Winterson Rd. , Suite 280 Linthicum, MD 21090 Internal Charge No. 3390-2407

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY a= = An initial review of the data acquired from City No. 1(Knoxville, TN) has been conducted. When compared with subjects recruited from Cities 2 - 5, the Knoxville subject population is slightly more female, younger, has somewhat more high school education but le:-s college education, and has less family income. The recruiting procedure was modified prior to subject testing in City No. 9 (Daytona Beach), to enhance inclusion of subjects which would be exposed to ETS. This was based on low cell populations in Cities 5 & 6. Some irregularities were observed in Ci,!ies 9 and 10, suggesting that some of the recruiting may have been conducted in a non-random fashion Depending on the impact on the study, and the reliability of the data, it may be necessary to consider adding a 13th city to the study. Salivary cotinine levels for City No. 1 indicated that at least 7 of the subjects must be considered mis- classified with regard to their smoking status. Median salivary cotinine levels for population cells comprised of the remaining particfpants seemed to be ordered as a function of the expected duration of smoke exposure for participants in those cells. Regarding smoke exposure itself, ETS exposure levels collectively were low, but approximately 10 times greater in smoking environments than in non-smoking environments. INTRODUCTION This is the first in a series of periodic status summary reports describing the results of a study designed to determine human exposure to environmental tobacco smoke components. The focus of this report is a preliminary and brief examination of the data generated from the first city in the study, Knoxville, Tennessee, although additional observations have been made as well. It is critical to note that all of the data described in this report is of a preliminary nature, and is subject to revision. EXPERIIVIENTAL Subjects (approximately 100 per city in each of twelve cities) ar.- recruited by a local marketing research firm under subcontract to the prime marketing research subcontractor, Bellomy Research, of Winston-Salem, NC. Subjects are to be contacted at random and screened through an initial telephone interview. Participants are to be included in the study on the basi,; of the following criteria: Non- smokers, at least 18 years of age, with no tobacco or smoking cessation aid (nicotine patch or gum) use within the past 6 months. They are to work a minimum of 35 hour; per week outside the home, and are not to be members of certain advocacy professions (eg. legal, EPA, OSHA) or groups (eg. Action on Smoking and Health, American Lung Association). If the subject passes all of the screening criteria, and is willing to participate in the study (the subject is told that the objective of the study is to assess personal air quality), the subject is placed in a population cell (ie. smoking and non-smoking home and workplace), based on his/her responses to certain questions. On the evening of the subject's first day of participation in the study, the subject arrives at the test site, and is re-screened to verify the accuracy of the telephone questionnaire. That evening, the subject watche;> an instructional video, answers another questionnaire, receives the sampling pump systems, and provides an initial saliva sample. Upon arriving at work on the morning of Day 2, the subject begins using a personal sampling pump, and begins to. fill out a "workplace diary" sheet. At the end of the workday, the subjects turns off the workplace sampling pump, completes the workplace diary, dons the "home" pump (which is outfitted with a larger battery pack for longer duration sampling), and goes t,ome via the store, restaurant, etc, conducting normal activities. At bedtime, the subject removes the home pump, and sets it alongside the bed, as it continues to sample. On the morning of Day 3, after arriving at work, the subjects turns VRAFr.• .v data is of a prawwy naron and subjea to rau,vn ane conocrkn! 89272849 1