Lorillard
Fields
- Author
- Stone, C.J.
- Area
- LIFE SCIENCE LAB 20/BASEMENT GMP
- Document File
- 88976173/88976285/I1729.004
- Request
- R1-058
- Alias
- 88976243/88976244
- Type
- LETT, LETTER
- LIST, LIST
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- Recipient
- Henry, C.J.
- Recipient (Organization)
- Micro, Microbiological Associates
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Named Person
- D, R.M.
- Author (Organization)
- Dabt
- Lor, Lorillard
- Characteristic
- ILLE, ILLEGIBLE
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- Site
- G41
- UCSF Legacy ID
- maj90e00
Document Images
v q6- --- - - -
4w...we' A Division of Loews Theatres, Inc., Research Center, 420 English Street, P.O. Box 21688,
Greensboro, North Carolina 2742C
July 12, 1983
Microbiological Associates
5221 River Road
Bethesda, biD 20816
~
Dr. Carol J. Henry
Dear Dr. Henry: -
The following is a list of comments and questions for draft
reports 1-1729.003 and 1-1729.004, Comparative Toxicity of Test
Cigarette Smoke with Reference gigarette Smoke After Inhalation
in Mice and Rats with LRC materials D6 and D10, respectiveli:
1-1729.003
i
fJ
l~ ri _
'~ ~-
1. On page 12, paragraph 3, line 13: the text should read "for
~" mice exposed to cigarette D10, the mean was significantly
lower than the reference."
2. On page 12, paragraph 6, line 6: although the one unre-
covered covered survivor mentioned here is noted in Table 5F for
Group 6, it would be helpful to report that this survivor
was from Group 6 (D6 cigarette) in this section as well.
3. In Table 2C, there seems to be disagreement with Table 3C as
~4
in Table 2C seems to have been the non-survivor as evidenced
~
to which animal died. Animal #1073 which is reported to
have died during exposure in Table 3C seems to have received
~jmaximum exposure as shown in Table 2C, whereas animal #107
8
`J~.., V by the smaller numbers of exposures and puffs received.'
J
'' 1o Please clarify. ~~
4.. In Table 3G: Why was the body weight fo~' 1#.1097
omitted for Day 1? Which animal was the one survivor in
this group as referred to in Table 5G?
1-1729.004
!
.`
C.,
J
'
rt
1
\
~.~
1. On page 6, paragraph 1, line 3: received is misspelled..
, GO
2. On page 12, paraqraph 6, lines 4-7: according to Table 5, 00
the observations mentioned do not appear in all the smoke-
~ ~
exposed groups as is reported here. The observations of
"occasionally trembling" and "fur soiled" are not reported N
~
in Table 5. ~ W
~

Dr. Carol J. Henry
Page 2
July 12, 1983
3. In Table 3A and 3C: only 2 animals were taken off test to
be sacri~iced for enzymatic evaluation of tissues, and one
other animal died during exposure. Likewise, in Table 3B,
one animal died during exposure, but 3 animals were taken
off test to be sacrificed for enzynatic evaluation of
tissues as specified in Protocol Amendment 1601.004-2.
Please clarify.
4. In Table 5A, under Observations Inmediately After Exposure,
'r column 3: the notation "D5/5" is used for "runny noses."
j.z' tJhat does "D" represent?
5. In lable 6, column 3, lineq 2 and 3: superscript
.
be rnoved to the right for Group 2 and 3. .
If you have any questions, please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
Connie J. Stone, Ph. D. , D.A. B. T.
/tb: 2
3
Z
ria
should
