Lorillard
Economic Justification for Worksite Smoking Policies
Fields
- Author
- Tollison, R.D.
- Wagner, R.E.
- Alias
- 88772573/88772584
- Type
- REPT, OTHER REPORT
- BIBL, BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Area
- CROUSE,WILLIAM/BASEMENT GMP
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Characteristic
- EXTR, EXTRA
- Site
- G10
- Named Organization
- Auburn Univ
- Bureau of Economics
- Clemson Univ
- Cornell Univ
- Fl State Univ
- Ftc, Federal Trade Commission
- George Mason Univ Fairfax Va
- Office of Technology Assessment
- Presidents Council of Economic Advisors
- Southern Economic Assn
- Tulane Univ
- Tx A+M Univ
- Univ of Ca Irvine
- Univ of Va
- Urban Inst
- Va Tech
- Bureau of Economics
- Master ID
- 88772371/2597
Related Documents:- 88772371-2597 United States Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Tobacco Smoke: A Compendium of Technical Information Comments of the Tobacco Institute 900205 Reviewers' Statements
- 88772372-2379 Comments on Chapter 3
- 88772380-2396 Review of: Environmental Tobacco Smoke A Compendium of Technical Information
- 88772397-2403 Reactions to Environmental Tobacco Smoke: A Compendium of Technical Information Chapter 4: Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Cancer
- 88772404-2418 Comments on Environmental Tobacco Smoke: A Compendium of Technical Information Chapter 4: Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Cancer
- 88772419-2433 Chapter 4: Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Cancer - Environmental Tobacco Smoke: A Compendium of Technical Information
- 88772434-2442 Statement
- 88772443-2466 Critique of the Report Entitled Environmental Tobacco Smoke: A Compendium of Technical Information U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chapters 5-8
- 88772467-2481 Environmental Tobacco Smoke: A Compendium of Technical Information Technical Review
- 88772482-2494 Review of: Environmental Tobacco Smoke A Compendium of Technical Information
- 88772495-2500 Comments by Dr. Guy B. Oldaker III on Chapter 5 Measuring Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke
- 88772501-2504 Comments with References on 'measuring Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke'
- 88772505-2512 Comments by Dr. Guy B. Oldaker III on Chapter 6 Exposures to Air Pollutants
- 88772513-2530 Comments by Dr. Guy B. Oldaker III on Chapter 7 Exposure Assessment in Passive Smoking
- 88772531-2533 Comments on Chapter 7: Exposure Assessment in Passive Smoking
- 88772534-2540 Review of Chapter 8 by D. Hoffmann, K.D. Brunnemann, and N. J. Haley of the Draft Compendium of Technical Information on Ets Edited by the Environmental Protection Agency
- 88772541-2553 Critique of Environmental Tobacco Smoke: A Compendium of Technical Information Chapter 9: the Effects of Passive Smoking and Day Care on Respiratory Illnesses in Children
- 88772554-2572 Evaluation of Appendix 10: Economic Justification for No Smoking Policies at the Worksite
- 88772585-2596 Review of: Environmental Tobacco Smoke A Compendium of Technical Information
- Named Person
- Ault
- Behrens, R.
- Buchanan, J.M.
- Ekelund
- Jackson
- Kristein
- Luce
- Rice
- Saba
- Saurman
- Schweitzer
- Tollison, R.D.
- Wagner, R.E.
- Weis
- Behrens, R.
- Date Loaded
- 12 Feb 1999
- UCSF Legacy ID
- hgh30e00
Document Images
t
once it is recognized that indoor air contains numerous other
things, the relative significance of cigarette smoke
diminishes even further, which in turn makes even less
plausible the claim that smoking is a sionificant source of
ventilation costs, in most cases.
In sum, there is no economic justification for
workplace smoking rules, except those ru:les which have been
voluntarily adopted by firms and workers in the absence of
government policy. Firms have clear incentives to produce
their output at least cost. In this respect, even if smokers
are more costly employees (a point of view with which we
disagree), they will be employed because they add more to a
firm's revenues than to its cost, i.e., !:hey are productive
workers. To focus on the alleged costs of hiring a particular.
type of worker is totally beside the point. The point is to
hire the best workers, among which will often be found
smokers. Whether through open competition for workers or
through collective bargaining, the prope:- approach to
workplace smoking is to allow companies and employees to
decide upon the appropriate smoking policy on a
company-by-company basis. Government is not required to solve
this problem.
11

I
Reference s
1. Ault, R.W., R.B. Ekelund, J.D. Jackson, R.S. Saba and
D.S. Saurman, "Smoking and Abse
Study," Auburn, Alabama (1988). nteeism: An Empirical
r
1 2. Luce, B.L. and S.O. Schweitzer, "Smoking and Alcohol
i Abuse: A Comparison of their E conomic C onsequences,"
New England Journal of Medicine 298, 569-571 (1978).
3. Kristein, M.M., "How Much Can B usiness Expect to Profit
From Smoking Cessation?" Preve ntive Medicine, 12:
358-381 (1983).
4. Office of Technology Assessment , U.S. Congress,
"Smoking-Related Deaths and Fin ancial Costs."
Washington., D.C. (OTA Staff Mem orandum 1985).
5. Rice, D.P., T.A. Hodgson, P. Si nsheimer, W. Browner and
A.N. Kopstein, "The Economic Costs of the Health Effects
of Smoking, 1984" The Milbank Quarterly, 64: (4)
Cambridge University Press (1986).
6. Weis, W.L., "No Ifs, Ands or Buts: Why Workplace Smoking
Should Be Banned," Management World, 339-44, (Sept.
1981).
i
12
t
