Lorillard
Federal Alcohol Tax Facts
Fields
- Type
- REPT, OTHER REPORT
- Area
- SPEARS,ALEXANDER/OFFICE
- Alias
- 87679971/87679972
- Site
- G65
- Request
- R1-004
- R1-037
- R1-132
- R1-037
- Named Person
- Surgeon General
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- Document File
- 87679789/87680362/Missing
- Named Organization
- Congress
- Congressional Budget Office
- Journal of the American Medical Assn
- Natl Commission for Drug Free Schools
- Nbc
- Ny Times
- Wall Street Journal
- 1988 Workshop on Drunk Driving
- Congressional Budget Office
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Author (Organization)
- Center for Science in the Public Interes
- Master ID
- 87679895/0021
Related Documents:- 87679895-9896
- 87679897 Witness List for A Hearing on Preventive Health: An Ounce of Prevention Saves A Pound of Cure Before the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging the Honorable David Pryor, Chairman
- 87679898-9899 Preventive Health: An Ounce of Prevention Saves A Pound of Cure Senate Special Committee on Aging Opening Statement of Senator David Pryor, Chairman 930506
- 87679900-9901 Opening Statement Senator William S. Cohen 'an Ounce of Prevention Saves A Pound of Cure' 930506
- 87679902-9917 Testimony Special Committee on Aging U.S. Senate by Robert N. Butler, M.D. Brookdale Professor and Chairman Department of Geriatrics and Adult Development Mount Sinai School of Medicine
- 87679918-9921 for Testimony Before the Special Committee on Aging: the United States Senate 920513 Preventive and Older People
- 87679922-9932 Statement of the American Association of Retired Persons on Preventive Health Care
- 87679933-9941 Testimony of Dileep G. Bal, M.D. On Behalf of the Coalition on Smoking or Health to the Special Committee on Aging U.S. Senate on Preventive Health Care 930506
- 87679942-9951 Testimony Michael F. Jacobson, Ph.D. Executive Director, Center for Science in the Public Interest Washington, D.C. 930506 Senate Special Committee on Aging Hearing on Preventive Health
- 87679952-9953 Prevention's the Issue Your Money or Your Life Style
- 87679954-9957
- 87679958 Leading Contributors to Premature Death
- 87679959 Leading Causes of Death
- 87679960 Costs: Leading Causes of Death
- 87679961 Proposal for An Annual Surgeon General's Report on Diet and Health
- 87679962-9963 the Coalition for Nutrition Services in Health Care Reform - Position Statement
- 87679964 Stop Coddling the Booze Industry Tax Reform: Clinton Should Raise Rates and Cut Subsidies to Wineries and Distillers
- 87679965 Estimated Number of Deaths Attributable to Alcohol Consumption: United States 860000, 870000, 880000
- 87679966-9967 Alcohol Advertising Facts
- 87679968-9969 National Alcohol Tax Coalition Organizations Endorsing Increases in Alcohol Excise Taxes
- 87679970 Healthy Indulgences Breakfast
- 87679973-0013 Statement of Roger Herdman, M.D. Acting Director Office of Technology Assessment and Maria Hewitt, Dr.P.H. Senior Analyst, Health Program Office of Technology Assessment and Mary Laschober, M.S. Analyst, Health Program Office of Technology Assessment on Smoking - Related Deaths and Financial Costs: Office of Technology Assessment Estimates for 900000 Before the Senate Special Committee on Aging Hearing on Preventive Health: An Ounce of Prevention Saves A Pound of Cure
- 87680014-0016 Statement to the Special Committee on Aging United States Senate Re: Health Effects of Tobacco and Alcohol Upon Senior Citizens
- 87680017-0019 Statement to the Special Committee on Aging United States Senate Re: Health Effects of Tobacco and Alcohol Upon Senior Citizens
- 87680020 Statement by the Coalition on Smoking or Health, on New Estimates by the Office of Technology Assessment on the Costs of Tobacco Use
- 87680021
- UCSF Legacy ID
- nqu21e00
Document Images
~ ~ SCIENCE
SPI ~uBTHE
INTEREsr
~
Nn'hrr ,.r Nutrition Action Healthletter
Federal Alcohol Tax Facts
T'he alcohol in beer and wine is taxed at much lower rates than the alcohol in liquor. This
inequitable tax policy was originally based on a flawed assumption-that the alcohol in hard liquor
is
more harmful than that in a can of beer or glass of wine. 'Ibe amounts of alcohol in a 12 oz. beer,
a
4.7 oz. serving of wine, and a 1.4 oz. serving of liquor are roughly equal-yet each is taxed at a
different rate. In FY 1992 federal alcohol taxes generated $7.9 billion in revenue.
Increased Revenues And Decreased Costs
Based on three different tax-raising formulas, the federal government could net anywhere from
$4.5 billion to $23 billion annually in new revenues. In addition, these same scenarios would reduce
alcohol's costs to society from as little as $2 billion to as much as $12 billion annually due to
decreases
in alcohol-related problems.
Raise Beer And Wine Taxes To Liquor Rate
1 Year 5 Years
Net new revenues: $4.5 billion $22.46 billion
Reduction in alcohol problems: 2.1 %
Reduction in costs to society: $2.2 billion
Adjust All Rates For Inflation 1970-1992
1 Year 5 Years
Net new revenues: $8.7 billion $43.47 billion
Reduction in alcohol problems: 3.8%
Reduction in costs to society: $4 billion
Adjust Liquor Rate For Inflation Since 1970
and
Raise Beer And Wine Taxes To Liquor Rate
1 Year 5 Years
Net new revenues: $23.4 billion $117 billion
Reduction in alcohol problems: 11.5%
Reduction in costs to society: $12 billion
Experts And The Public Support Higher Alcohol Excise Taxes
The Surgeon General's Workshop on Drunk Driving recommended that the federal government equalize
beer, wine, and liquor rates, adjust for past inflation, and annually adjust for inflation.
The Final Report of the National Commission for Drug Free Schools (September 1990) recommended
that the federal government increase taxes to deter young people from using alcohol.
In a December 1992 article in the Journal of the American Medical Association, a compilation of
three
polls showed a 76% approval rating for higher alcohol and tobacco taxes to fund a national health
insurance program.
According to a May 1990 Tune poll, 72% of those polled favor raising taxes on alcoholic beverages.
-over-
1875 1875 Connerticut Auenue. NW. Suite 300, Waslnngton, D.C. 20009-5728 (202) 332-9110 FAX
(202) 265-4954
Exe:utive Director: Midaael ktcobson. Ph.D.

In a May 1990 New York Tunes poll, 80% thought that increasing the tax on beer and liquor was
acceptable.
A spring 1990 Wall Street JournaI/NBC poll found 83% of those polled favoring higher alcohol excise
taxes.
In 1986, and again in 1990, over 70 prominent economists signed a petition to increase alcohol
excise
taxes, and to eliminate or modify the differential treatment between beer, wine, and liquor.
1993 Federal Excise Tax Rates
BEER WINE LIQUOR
12 oz. $.05
4.7 oz.$.04 (80 proof)
1.4 oz.S.12
6-pack .33 750 m1.21 750 ml 2.14
Federal Excise Tax Rates Equalized
BEER WINE LIQUOR
12 oz. $.12
4.7 oz.$.12 (80 proof)
1.4 oz.S.12
6-pack .70 750 ml .64 750 ml 2.14
Federal Excise Tax Rates Adjusted for Inflation and Equalized
BEER WINE LIQUOR
12 oz. 5.33
4.7 oz.S.33 (80 proof)
1.4 oz.$.33
6-pack 1.97 750 ml 1.81 750 ml 6.02
A February 1993 report from the Congnessional Budget Office provides a
deficit reduction option that would equalize the tax rates on beer and wine
to a rate of $16.00 per proof gallon of liquor. This boost would yield new
revenues of $ 22.6 billion in five years.
Excise Taxes And Public Health
The Surgeon General's 1988 Workshop on Drunk Driving concluded that an increase in the
excise tax could have the largest beneficial long-term effect on alcohol-impaired driving of all the
policy
and program options available.
Because higher taxes would increase the cost of alcoholic beverages, they would decrease
consumption and decrease alcohol-related problems. Studies on the effect of increased state taxes on
alcohol found declines in auto fatalities and liver-cirrhosis deaths.
Congress has rarely raised excise taxes despite the facts that inflation was eroding the value of
the taxes and that higher rates could generate billions of dollars in new revenue. Since 1951 the
federal
taxes on beer and wine have been increased only once, in 1990. Over the same forty years, the tax on
liquor was increased slightly in 1985 and again in 1990.
Partially due to the declining value of tax rates, the average price of alcoholic beverages fell
by ~
25 percent behind the overall Consumer Price Index between 1967 and 1982 and has remained at that 0~
level since then. ~
February 1993 ~
N
