Lorillard
the Demographics, Psychographics and, Activities / Interests of True Smokers, Competitive Smokers, and Smokers in General
Fields
- Alias
- 87011929/87012024
- Area
- ADVERTISING/BASEMENT GMP
- Type
- MRRT, MARKET RESEARCH REPORT
- CHAR, CHART/GRAPH/MAPS
- Site
- G1
- Named Organization
- Sri Intl
- Master ID
- 87011929/2024
Related Documents:
Document Images
(
r
c
THE DEMOGRAPHICS,
PSYCHOGRAPHICS AND,
ACTIVITIES/INTERESTS
OF TRUE SMOKERS, COMPETITIVE
SMOKERS, AND SMOKERS
IN GENERAL
l
~
~
Q
N
Ma
Cp
W
0
JuLY, 1986 PREPARED BY: DFS DORLAND
# 68173 RESEARCH
JC/cs

J
Tv:
From:
Subjecr:
rrm r?" &r.r
Dancer Fitzgerald Sample, Inc.
Client Memo
Andy Pasheluk Date: 7/21/86
Chris Nunes
Analysis of True Sm okers Based on Simmons and Va1s Data
As an aid to F'87 planning, this forwards an analysis of True
smokers based on Simmons and Vals data recently completed by our
Research Department.
Background
As part of F'87 planning, DFSD has completed an analysis of True
and competitive smokers based on Simmons/Vals data designed to
improve the targeting of media and promotion programs to key
prospects next year. This information augm ents 1985 switching
data which confirms that True's primary target audience for 1987
should remain the same as in 1985-86.
The 1985 Simmons/Vals data base on line at DFSD was utilized for
this analysis and includes 19,159 adult respondents (18+) who
were interviewed from- August 1984 to June 1985. Demographic
profiles based on Simmons data and Psychographic profiles based
on crosstabs with the Vals segments have been provided for the
following smoker groups:
1. Total Smokers
2. Heavy (30+ cig/day) vs. moderate (20-29 cig/day) vs.,
light smokers (10-19 cig/day)
3. Lo Fi vs. Low Tar vs. ULT smokers
4. True Smokers
5. Marlboro and Marlboro Lights smokers (opportunity target
based on switching study)
6. Vantage, Merit and Benson & Hedges sm okers (com petitive Low
Tar/ULT families)
7. Now, Carlton and Barclay Smokers (competitive ULT smokers)

,
Page 2
IMPLICATIONS
Overall, this analysis appears to provide support for exploring
the following m arketing opportunities previously discussed!;
1. Tie-In Promotions: Simmons/Vals data indicates heavy
smokers (30+ cig7day), including True smokers are heavy
users of beer, wine and coffee. An opportunity exists to
attract heavy smokers by pursuing tie-in promotions within
these product categories.
2. Male-Oriented Promotions: Simmons indicates the bulk of
heavy smo ers are m en. An opportunity exists to build incre-
mental True volum e, which traditionally skews female, by
targeting m ale-oriented promotions to heavy male smokers.
3. True Sweepstakes/Contests: The Simm ons data indicates True
smokers generally enter contests and sweepstakes more
frequently than competitive sm okers. An opportunity exists
to reach True smokers in a unique way with travel-oriented
contest/sweepstakes which tie into the "Journalist"
cam paign. This suggests that the Overseas Press Shop
promotion would appeal to True Smokers.
4. Adults 50+ - Simm~ons data indicates that over 35% of True
smokers are in the 50+ age group, which is higher than
Vantage, Merit, B&H, Carlton and Barclay. The Switching
Study indicates a-similar level. An opportunity exists to
broaden reach of the Parent True franchise by targeting
specific publications' to this group (50 plus, etc.).
5. True Gold Franchise Study: analysis of Simmons/ Vals data
indicates there are differences between low tar and' ULT
smokers. Subsequently, it is conceivable that demographic/
psychographic differences will exist between True Gold'and
Parent True smokers. The True Gold franchise study now in-
progress should help better identify the differences between
these two smoker groups.
Andy, you will notice there are other implications highlighted in
the analysis which are som ewhat more subjective and hypothetical
in nature. For this reason, we have chosen not to highlight
them here. However, we look forward to having your reaction to
these areas as well.
Best regards,
qt!LLI
CN/pr
cc: J. Daghlian T. Bohan D. Cimine C. Boudreau
K. Curren S. Strohm I. Weinblatt E. Meyer
H. Westphalen M. Jeary B. Tucker
S. Benson M. McDonald B. Lynch

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE NO.
INTRODUCTION ........................................ 1
Background ....................................... 1
Purpose ........................................... 1
Method ........................................... 1
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ................................. 2-5
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS ........................ 6
DETAILED FINDINGS ................................... 7-26
f
I Total Smokers ............................... 7-12
II Heavy, Moderate and Light Smokers .......... 12-13
III Menthol and Non-Menthol Smokers ............ 14
IV Lo-Fi, Low Tar and ULT Smokers ............. 15-16
V True Smokers............................... 17-18
VI Marlboro and Marlboro Lights Smokers....... 19-20
VII Vantage, Merit and Benson & Hedges Smokers. 21-23
VIII Now, Carlton and Barclay Smokers ........... 24-26
c
TABLES
APPENDIX Descriptions of VALS Segmentation
Procedure and VALS Types

c
INTRODUCTION
k
~. _.. ... ......~..,... ..-:~.,

-1-
r
t
t
E
(
BACKGROUN'D
In order to make effective marketing and media decisions for the
True brand, the Agency utilizes all available sources of category,
brand and user information. Last April, 1985 DFS' Dorl;and Research
put together a brand profile analysis using Lorillard brand
switching data which proved to be helpful in providing concise brand
profile information. Another data source available to the Agency,
but not yet fully utilized is Simmons/VALS.
DFS Dorland Media uses Simmons data for media purposes, but the
Agency has not utilized Simmons/VALS data for its demographic,
product usage and attitudinal/lifestyle information which can
provide a richer understanding of smokers in general, as well as
brand users.
PURPOSE
The purpose of conducting this analysis is to...
gain a better understanding of smokers in general and by the
amount and types of cigarettes smoked, e.g. lo-fi, low tar or
ULT and menthol and non-menthol cigarettes.
develop a more comprehensive profile both demographically and
psychographically of the True smoker in order to target our
marketing efforts most effectively in 1987.
investigate the key similarities and differences between the
True smoker and competition which could yield valuable
marketing and promotional opportunities for the True brand,
especially Marlboro which is a,.major source of business for
the True brand as indicated in the June 1985 Brand Switching
Study. This data may provide insights as to ways to approach
Marlboro smokers through any specialized promotional efforts.
METHOD
The'1985 Simmons/VALS d'ata base, which is on line at DFS Dorland,
includes 19,159 respondents and is projectable to the population.
aged 18 years and older. A personal interview was conducted to
obtain demographic information and a self-administered questionnaire
was left with the respondent to record product and attitude data.
The interviewing process for the entire sample was conducted from
August, 1984 to June, 1985.

(
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
c

-2-
SLTMMARY OF FINDINGS
I
GENERAL SMOKING CATEGORY
Smokers, in terms of their demographics, are equally male and
female, tend to be younger to middle aged with about two-thirds
of all smokers between the ages of 18 to 44 years and downscale
in terms of education, employment and household income when
compared to non-smokers. In terms of their psychographic
profile, smokers represent a wide range of lifestyles from the
very affluent Achiever segment to the lower socio-economic
Sustainer group. And while psychographically smokers are,
overall, similar to the population as a whole, smokers have a
somewhat higher concentration of Emulators and Sustainers'
lifestyles than do non-smokers.
There are some differences in the profiles of the heavier versus
lighter smoker. The heavier smoker tends to be ritore male, middle
aged with higher household incomes. The heavier smoker profile
also has a higher concentration of Achievers (24%), hard-driving~
individuals who are affluent and successful. Heavier smokers
also are the heaviest consumers of coffee. In contrast, lighter
smokers tend to be more female, either very young or old with
lower household incomes.
TAR LEVEL
The most pronounced profile differences, however, are noted by
tar level categories. Lo-fi smokers, on one extreme, have a
young, male, downscale profile. In contrast, the ultra low tar
smokers' profile is to the other extreme skewing older, more
female and more educated and upscale. The low tar smoker profile
is more moderate falling in between lo-fi and ultra low tar
profiles. Low tar smokers are equally male and female and young,
to middle ages. These three profiles are briefly summarized
below.
Lo-fi smokers:
Slightly more male (56%)
Younger with over half under age 35
Downscale in terms of education and! incomes
High concentration of Sustainers (19%), Emulators (16%)
- and
a sizable proportion of Belongers (30%)
Least active overall, but interested in hunting, fishing
and motorcycling.
Heavy consumption of beer

-3-
Low Low Tar Smokers:
Equally male and female
. Young to middle age
Downscale in terms of education and household incomes, but
better educated with higher household incomes than lo-fi
smokers.
High concentration of Emulators (14%) and sizable
proportion of Belongers (35%) with some Achievers (19%)
Overall, average in activities, but more involved than
lo-fi smokers
Above average consumption of beer, coffee and liquor
Ultra Low Tar Smokers:
Skews more female (61%)
Older
More upscale in terms of education, occupation, household
incomes
Skews A/B Counties; Metro Central City
High concentration of Achievers (27%), Societally Conscious
(14%) and sizable proportion of Belongers (30%)
~
Much more active indexing above average on most activities/
hobbies, sports attendance, domestic and foreign travel.
9 Heavy consumption of coffee, liquor, and wine

TRUE SMOKER PROFILE
Overall, True Smokers are representative of the ULT category in
terms of demographics and lifestyle. Like other ULT smokers,
True smokers are...
r
more female (61%)
older with 60% between the ages of 35 and 65,
better educated,
with higher household incomes.
The only notable demographic characteristic is that True smokers
are more concentrated in the Northeast and less in the West
versus the ULT category in general and the population as a whole.
.Psychographically, the True profile consists of a substantial
number of Belongers (36%), the middle class, traditional value
group, Achievers (23%), hard driving, successful, affluent
individuals, and an above average number of Experientials (14%),
who are attracted to what is new, different and unusual. It is
interesting to note this concentration of Experientials among the
True franchise. We can hypothesize that Experientials may be
attracted by True's unique laser cut filter.
Product usage and leisure activities of True smokers were
investigated to explore possible product tie-ins and promotional
ideas. This analysis reveals that True Smokers appear to be
fairly out-going and active with above average interest in
community affairs, live theater, classical concerts and foreign
and d'omestic travel. However, participation in sporting
activities or sports attendance is fairly low due to the female
skew of the True franchise. True smokers are more apt to have
hobbies like gardening or cards. They also tend to buy state
lottery tickets and enter contests and sweepstakes. Consumption
of distilled liquor, wine, beer and coffee is fairly high.
