Lorillard
New York City: Smoking-Attributable Mortality, Morbidity and Economic Costs
Fields
- Author
- Shultz, J.M.
- Type
- SCRT, SCIENTIFIC REPORT
- CHAR, CHART/GRAPH/MAPS
- FOOT, FOOTNOTE
- CHAR, CHART/GRAPH/MAPS
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT FILE ROOM
- Alias
- 85648421/85648437
- Site
- N14
- Named Person
- Browner
- Hodgson
- Kopstein
- Rice
- Schweitzer
- Sinsheimer
- Surgeon General
- Vogt
- Hodgson
- Named Organization
- Kaiser Permanente
- Mn Dept of Health
- Natl Center for Health Statistics
- Ny City Dept of Health
- Mn Dept of Health
- Date Loaded
- 12 Feb 1999
- Document File
- 85648249 /85648723 /Legislation Re: Nyc Smoking Restriction Proposal Volumeii - 860501
- 85648250 /85648722 /Legislation Re: New York Citysmoking Proposal Volume II 860501
- Master ID
- 85648375/8442
Related Documents:- 85648375-8442 Report of the Mayor's Committee on Smoking and Health
- 85648377-8393 A Local Law - Draft to Amend the Administrative Code of the City of New York in Relation to the Control of Pollution From Smoking.
- 85648394-8398 Memorandum in Support
- 85648399-8415 A Local Law to Amend the Administrative Code of the City of New York, in Relation to the Control of Pollution From Smoking.
- 85648416
- 85648417
- 85648418-8420 Mayor's Committee on Smoking and Health List of Speakers Hearing of 860519 Board of Estimate Chamber City Hall, City of New York
- 85648438 41 Cfr Part 101-20 Smoking Regulations
- 85648439 Appendix H Contents
- 85648440 U. S. Army Tobacco Cessation Program
- 85648441 U. S. Army Tobacco Cessation Program
- 85648442 Proclamation
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Author (Organization)
- Mn Dept of Health
- Characteristic
- EXTR, EXTRA
- ILLE, ILLEGIBLE
- UCSF Legacy ID
- mog40e00
Document Images
i
AET, EIIDLY' F
NEW YORK CITY:
SMOlCING-ATTRIBUTABLE MORTALITY, MORBIDITY
AND ECONOMIC COSTS
Prepared' by:
James M. Shul tz M. S.
Mi'nnesots Department of Health
Minneapol is,, Minnesota
May, 1986

1.40 INTRODUCTION
1.1!0' SMOK'.I'NGrA'TTRIBUTiABL.E MORTALITY
. Csya~;at.`_2 smckiny' is the chief, sinqle pre.entable 'cause of
death in the l'Jni tzd States. A seri es of Surgzon GeneraL '_.
Repcrts on smoking and health has implicated cigarette'
smo4::ing as a principal cause of death of 'S0.0c.i0Americ_n-
each year. This fiy,ure rep:re=_ents the sum of e=_timate= c:f
smok:irng7athributab:le mortality from heart disease--1,0,000
deaths (USDHHS, 1980, cancErs of murl ti p1'e sites--1'0, 0-~i
deaths (USDHHS, 19SC), and chromic obstructive lung dis_ase--50,,ri00 decths !'tJSDHHG 1984') .
Recent e:stimates have
pL acad' annaial nati onal deaths f rom smok: i ng at 314,000
(Dffi'.c.e of Technology Assessment, 1985a) and 270.000 (F:ice.
Hodqson Sinsheimer and Ecrowner, 1985). respectively.
1.20 HEALTH ECONOMICS AND EP'IDEMI!OLOI6Y'
The ca'Tculation of "costs of iilness" has been reFined a'nd'
aystemat:ced during the last two decadles. This endeavor.
drterm'ininq'the costs of all diseases in the aggregate.
dzterminlnq, the-costs of major categories of diseases
(canccrs, h,Part disease), andl determi'ning costs of d'isease_
by primary cost sources (hospitals'~ phy_ician fees, nur_in,-
home co4tsJ has app.ropriateTy residedl a~ithin the purviie"-~f
heel th ecQnomi cs'.
F'r-imaril y wi'thi'n the last decade, several attempts ha.e bwen
made to translate the health toll from cigarette =_mckinq
:nt_o economic cost estimates. Calcul ation of the cost:s o:f
_m.o!.ing requires brid'qi'ng across the disciplines or health
economics and epidemiolog;.°. This merger of ev:pertise is
necessary to define causal 1inb.ages brtwc:en =_moi!ing and
multiple diseases, and-t` provide quantitative estimctG= of
theproportions of disease cases attributable to smohi;ng..
1.30 COMPUTER' SOFTWA'RE FOR MORTALITY, MORBIDITY, ANIDi
ECONOMIC COST CALCULAT IDNS
5af:ni.ny the dliaease impact of smoking for the group under
study can be f'aci 1 i tated b: appl yi ng state-of-thc--art
p.aN,aqyd for ease of use byy heal th
prorassionais:. Computer spreadsheets used for New Citv
3.'c'.t l±t. l1'n' s hd.y been dE:`+'t`31 opFed at the ML (?1'nE?si7t,a De,''Jor t,iT.-r" t
,,,4 ' I-;eal th Qhu1. tc , 198341 whTcfi compute sToPi ny-spec i f. c
85648422

disease i,:Tp;_tLt, incRsl_Fe.' reca11i;1 u'Fijat,ad b`.~` Rice and
colleaaucs CF:xce Hc:;dy :on', Sir7sheimer, rind Bro:,,rer, ±JST,.
2'. 00-.NEW YORK CITY: SMOKING-ATTRIBUTABLE MORTALITY
CiT`ulation of smo4:inq-attributable mortality requires nP
definiti!on cf the set of diaqnoses causally linledto
.ci.garettz smoking,,, i_) an estimate of the relati .e r:>!-: ronr
siTloke.rs coillpared to nonsmokers for e~c;h d'idglnosis, ard ' !7;
inf ormwa't ion on smick ; nq' prevaT emce rates.
Lorrent smokers are at increased risk for muLtiple dices=_=,
primari ly from three dliaynostic cateqories: neoplasms
respiratory d.iseases, and', cardiovascuolar di=_ea=_es. Fcrmer
s:okars are al so at el evated ri sk compared to never smoE er-,
for a period of time po=_t-cessation. That time period
varies by di:agma5is and by level of lifetime tob'acco smoE>:e.
enwosure. Data from several 1arge prospective epidemiologic
studias whi'ch e;ramirrined' the impact of smoking on multipl'ee
d'iseasz outcomes permit estimation of relative ri=_l.s for
both current and former smokers for approa: i matel y Cfi
d'iagno=_es.
c^.1CQ THE DIAGNOSIS SET
The drzA3nasrs set u'sedl f'or New York Ci ty caLcul ations 1 s
identicc,l to that used by Rice, Hodgson, Sinsheimer, cnd'
Browner ('1955) .- Earl i er stud i es have i ncl ud'ed addii t i on all
smoE:inng-r'elated'~ diaqncases (Rice and Hodqson, 19S7; MD'H.
T%4) . The diagnosi=_ set used. by F;i'ce and colleaqucs r_s
generally distinquished by robust relative risk estimate-,
typ.ically derived from"inulti'ple prospective stad'ies.
The folTowinq, diagnoses are inc1!udzdl in"the campuntations:
ICD-9 C
d no
Di
is
o
e
1*1l ;i-<~1C ag
s
F'espiratory tuber'c'uI'osi s.
1 4 Ci -14!9 Cancers of the L i p, oral cavi ty, phar,;n~:
1 !~%'? Cancer of' the esnphayus
151 Cancer of the stomach
157 C.nnc'er of the pancreas m'
161 Cancer of the 1ar vn:: tJT
Cancer s of the-1 unq, trache a, bronc_nus ~,
1 J'( / Cancer of' the uterine cervl:: ~
~9N9,
Cancer
of
the kidney W'
Ah .'
~'.
Qa~ .:

C
Hypertc+is ion _
tsche:n'ic heart disea5e
C'ardiac arrest
Carabro.rescular d'ise~~se
AtfieroslIerosi s
Aortic aneurysm
4?~u-4W 7' F'neumoni a; i nf Z uen: a
4?1-4!aC Chronic bronchitis, emph>/se,ra
4!95 Chronic ai'rways ob=tructi'on~
5 71 1-C'4 Ul cers
The e::'clusion of' liver cirrhosis (appearing in e:~rlier7
iss r'e-asonabl!a because of' the strong, covar'iation ,f
and aicoha1l c(Jr'i5UiTlptYon. Other dliagniJses, T1asV iTe'rlt,
inclusioni in f'utur'e calculations. Peripheral vascular
disease (ICD-9 Code: 44.C) appears to have a stronq 1l1nG: to
smoking (USDHHS, 190-') but reZati~xe r'is4:: estimates are
generally: 1'ack:ingi. Attributabl'e risks have rerFntly been
estimated for per'i'natal and early childhood' cnnditions
l i nE: ed to maternal smoG~i ng (Mc Iintosh, 198'4 ). Di aynosEs to
consider for inclusion are: short gestation andilow birth
weight (ICD~9 C,3(Je: 7-,:r), respir'story di's'tresss s;zndrcme
('I1CD-9 Code: 76?) , re=_p i ratory cond'i t'i ons of the ne~jt,orn
Code: 7'70), and suddP-n infant death svndrome ~'IC'C-'=
Code: 792.!:}) .
Cor7,.ersel;:, hypertension iis i~ncPuded by Rice end coPlea,;-;es
.
bPcause of modest relative risks in several major stuid:es.
Hbwever, the 1acE:: of consi'Stant e-vidence for a cau=_ai
relationship between smok:i'na and hypertension was noted in
the 19S'_ Surgeon Gereral "s Report (USDHHS, 19s') . That
report did concede a'possiblv causal relationship between
s,nol,: ing arrdi ear ly stroke (pri or to ape, -55) . The R;'i d'a, et
al'. , methodbloy,y includes all ages in calcuIlaticns o+
sm'oking-attri!butabl'e' czrebrova=_cuTar diseases.
Finallyr chronic airways obstruction (ICD-9' Code: 496 + :,a--
incliuded' i'n addition to emphysema and' chroni_c bronchi:ti=.
In Minnesata and presumably elsewhere, when a patient
presents with chronic obstruct.ive Zung disease (CDLZ%
symptoms, the physician may attempt' a d'iff'erential diagnosis
to classiify the patient as havingchronlic bronchlitils or
emphfsema.. Very of ten, the case i s not easi l'y cl assi f' i ed
into one of these categories and' is classified instead a=_
r_hron tc airways obstruction.
W
2.20 ' RELATT VE R I SI` EST IMA'TES C11 .
. ~

!r ~`r e'ach' dl 7g r, 0-s 1' =_ 1'n th P_ =a1cu, la tl~7ns't rZla '-_ 1ia' irl SI
estimates are a,Iailablr fr-om major lenigitUdinal epldem.e-'
1ogilc StUdl'es and' these estimates are th'cr-7l.(yhl :
in a series of four Surgeon General's Reports !UEDHE'uJ, 13'',;
USDHHS, 199C': USrJHHS, 199''; USDI-IHS, 19°4) . 1'ni previ'cus wor:.
iF:it_e and Hcdgson, 198__;, MDH, 1984) relative ris4:s u(sea were
d1:3',,:,G or T1ed1.3n vdil.leS from' si_lmmar/ tables app',.?_arI!'iq ' ..:.
report?s cf ttie Surg,eoni General. In the Upolat.ed wC;i-:: _
F'ice. Hodyi>>n,i Sinsheimer, and Browrner t t Mr; , rr: l4+ ,.';~
risks for each diagnosis are .actlny: 'i
Accardingto the meth:~t ~ ;,;_,_
. L car, ( epu.,r t ,
~,~.
L.~_1'ijl L: '~. ~1a7~_. 1..~~~'~~}' «ai~l lIlc?. :. i..~, -. ~ _.~. ~~ fi _. 1~-... -..`~.rc-' -.'
. _,. ~
Jht la'iJ~ ......, .~ + ~ .~~.1_..
T:i:: ,'Lri:a 'L :3e1-;rl-'r --l:e?c ~ ". _ ~ - . . . .' ,.,': P ., ._., "..' , _ _~:
. ^.I ....j C:r~ ! ~.1 ~-a!"t. F-'h.`, :Sli~=1..a~1"i'- =f~.~~a.t_~~'i.,
1:-Pj "t_-Llt::, 1jr; t.Cd' ..i
:
r,rm
r:S4Cs f,.;r- fT JL a"j-:I1,J5i:S we;r~?' f,7r c_,-.eIlh.
,:al
~ _-
~
EW `i~t7F.'F' C 1 T'' . 1 `~94
":
EW4
tb
-..-3':~~.i
.,h ~ r 2:,
JC?:At'h,s yimony nan s ni_74 er-s
J.i..'7
t, t.,. _aIm-yaars of observation in stuld~r i
person-years for smokers in StUid.. i
person-years -for nonsmo4::ers in studyi
2.30 SMOKING PR'EVALENCE' RATES.
Smoking, preva'lence rates usedl in the spreadsheet
calculations are 1984 New York: Cit, , rates based an
projection of' large sample data to the entire popu:ation r=t
New York City. These numeric and' percentage zstimat=s or
cc:crrent, former, and ne:er 3mo4:ers were calculated b,
,:ip:d'emiol'ogists at the New York City Diepartment of Hralth.
'
-
'
T,b.a~ _.'H.
SMQF ING F
EE
.'ALENCE F:MTES
"1A LF_8: a''-_4 2 5 -_4' 7 5 -4 4 45 -6 4 ~~+ ~',

;:,JF:FEVT . 6 5 '. 7'1.5~.. 'O W=,. ii.'S7.: 21.15.
FORMER . e.67 -O. 08 :. 21. 17 26.71 40.75
NEVER 5;'.68 42.22 34.00~~4'. 1C 78. W
_
'
.
,
^i
~
'. .
T
~
^
_. ..
.... ~
~.
~~ ~
~
:
' FEMC,LES
_
-
~4 -
4
.
.J J~`t
'7" ~v;
~
'7..J''t
6W
. CUF:F'EhiT 26.62% =3.'u?;'. _. 16;. Em.27% 1 a'.W:
FORMER 12494 11,51 M I6.54 1b.?6 22. 4'
NEVER 60. 44l 54. 8C' 50. 20 51. -7 6'.7"' .
2. 4'O ATTR I BUTABG.E R ISY< CA4.CULAT IDN
The critical cal!cuTation in this spreadlsheet is the smokiny-
attributable fr.,cticn of deaths from each smoking-related
dia.gnosis. The attributab1'e ri5l: calculation manipulatcs
the data elzmenf s di scussedl above; for each di agnosi s in the
diag;nosis set, the gender-specific smo~~!;ing-attri5atable risl::
i s calicuTated from currant, former and never smcker
prevaLence rates and from current and' former smcG er
rei''ati fe risl;s according Wthe following formula:
CpO +p 1( RR 1) + Q 4RR'_')7- I
Httributab1!e F:i sk = ---------------- -----
Cpca' + p1 (F:R1) + pZ'CRR2) 7
where:
p!'i: - percent of never smokers in group under stud-i
p l: percent of' current smok ers i n group under =_tud'/
p2': '- per-cent of former smokers in group under st+_id,
RR2: weiyhted relative risk for former smokers*
. RF'1: weighted relative risk for current .smckerst
* rel ative to never smoE! er=_
2'.60 DA'TA SUMMARY
Tab l e r^..6r+: ANNUAL SMOFr.:I'NG-ATTFi I L+<UTF',BLE "1OFi'TAL I,T`+
roEW YORY CITY
. m
AGE GF:GUF' MALES FEMALES FOTN' SEYEJ ~
~
20-a- 7294 1954 112 4 3

ZO:-'44 48` 177 :5'
45-64
., 897
l.=u5--' .-. 3.'
1
4~J..,7~
2.50 SUMMAFeY OF METHODS
i+rom g:nder-spec't f lc siToki,ngprt-"6val,enice rat,r=5 f(or =orr -'o"
and former =_mokers ('for al L ages _0-and over, for a,;e 0- -
6F, and far aqes 6C-and over) and gendcr-spar_i f u<< mor ta1 t`.
data for C0' d'iagnoses, es.timates of s!moGrinq"attrtbutabl _
rort a1 i t.y wern computed for mal es, fema'1 ts, and both :,emAr= 7E
b: i ndli , i dua'1 ddagross s, by d i agnost i c cat:egory, and f or the
t,_t,aii dii,,,gnov:s sYt. The numbersof deaths are presente.d tn
?y'e b'.racE, ets: : 0-441 4'5-54, 6C-74,
of these bracr:e'ts, a'ges 2~~:> and over.,
75 andi over
3.00: NEWYORkC CI?Y: Sf9OK'IN6-ATTR'IBUTABLE
. YEARS OF'POTEN'TIAL LIFE'LOST (YPLL)
3.10 METHOD'OLOCiY' AND SOFTWARE OPERATI'ON'.
tssi~_~e's inuolved in the cal'cul ation of
_nok:.nq-autributa'b1e mortality are' g,ermane to the
.:a'1zur: xtion' of years of potential 1'ife lost.
hi._..-i7t .. .Ji.i se~nC.e Wll-1w 1995s. I,1~9~O..cJb~.J'~.
Havi^g d!ef'ined the diagnos'is set of diseases cauu_aI1v 1tnl=t
to sanoking, and ha4ing inserted the two comp'on?n* .:ar:;tlps
of the attributable ris1: formula--smoF:_ing p,~reval:ence, rat__
and gender and d i seaye-spe'c &ic, wce,i ghted'. rel at i4n r i=',
est'imates--smoking-attributablr mortality ha'= been
cal''culated4 Cigaret te smok i ng i s tCnown to ca!_~Ja' nr~m :r _:=e
mortali ty i n the sense that nonsmoker=_ are 1 ess L:. Wel , t.=
dl e f'rom certal n s+To4: i ng-rCl at'zd diseases and ntilnsilrihet' _. "; .:;
do succumb to thes= di ag'noses yeneral l y d'i e at amor-_
e-.
.;d r-;nced age than th'ra.~i r coun terp<art s who amoke. Hawe',
re1ative ris1:; data' bu a:aa isy only a.nailable for a.mal 11
na,nber <<f :dia'ynose_. Estima:ti'on of e:;cas=_ smoking--
,ttl.rt ib~':;t.abte mcrtaliity by age of' death has been perfvr,ra.-'
f'c,r r_;rrcer-= c_~f sa:era'1' s'ites (Coll and F'etW. 1TE'Li', for
Lsclhow.c heart disasse !^1DH, 1184), and for botlh cacaer _ :'
lJ,(',`~ ,1f RtL~O ar,~d~ n~a'.l.l.r.~.6ig'l-Dn^3 1~1?35i, d~:.di, rYG1t, osr3 nCl.o.-
:p<-VIc y.c re::at7..C' "l si> data (a?;.Sept fur- t'wio, alE rang_-

C
a.hy.a 1 i ed~d t..i7 i.si=.h~aiG~1, -., h~ _ .. - _. : . _.- _ _:c3~, . 0. - sd annd 6J+I 1 . 4~~1
t..^.=.
yasis for the skra..d _nart +.h-drL<_qw, the' wcr'k of h-hE=_.
~LinVestity.ytCr'a c_.n i.,? _. ..:_yd to undc?'"ast1,^=t^a YPLL,. .`.c
l iimif:,lng a'ssu!amF't ionl-1!S t;'+at, for each SiT,(DkLny-;^'e,.I at=6
d!lngnos'17, tirlre smWE:ing-,3tF_r.:,b'ut3bl,e fr'.y,i=tlon r7f ijeatfis.[ s
dii=_tri'biited_ in e;:act prapm_rtion to the di stribution cf al i~
d.=_ .,th.s Fr- ..m that cause. Th iazverrtuates a consar : at i._
e,;timnaa' of Y'PLL based on the' prc_iumption of a
di ..prroN'mr}i ]nate amount of earU':' death from"s,nokTngi.
rates for r_urr?nt and f,orrner smoE:ar-, and aye and yendo.- -
sFeci f l c mortaL i t}; data fcr thE' dl agnes:. s set--chE:
-:=r'?a1sheet s[7ft.Wctr-n interlial'1'y' ca1L:l.llatrr_'s siTlokinqattribatable mc,rta;:ity f'or
males and females' bl rndi . Z_r_.1.
di3".1'UzI','s.. Re5.1.(jc?nt .. l,nthiespr-andshe.e'tn are tC1b.l,es .. ot'
,<ptcted years of' iifa remainin'y for males and f'erri;les b. 5-
y,.r age', jroUp. F'.r each d2'aLqnosl s, tCr' e'aCh' c-year a'yc
groufa, the software multipli'es the number of deaths in thw
aNl t b;. the :exprzcted years of I i f'e rem,,i niny for that age Jf
d'e.'ath, and mul tipl i es thi s product, in turn, by the smo4: ing-
afi.t.ributable risk for the d'iagno=_is. YPLL estimates are
aqgregated into four age brracke}':.; 20-44, 45-641 6C-74, 70
.A rrd1 o:.er. These age br<_,chet.s are summed to pro~ide the
estimate of totall smoking-attiributable YF'LL for- each
Using f'Jew Yurk City data--gender-specific smuki'ng pre:a
di.aynosi's.
The spreadsheet provi des gender-speci f i r_ `rF'LL e'sti mate _.~or
thQse age brackets by individual diagnosis nndl 5-> diay zstic
crateg¢,ry. and' dlspllys total smcF:lng-attribUtable YPLL.
Fur: -ha_rmore', these data ?.re al3o pr,-sen'ted tor bcrhisr ez-
combinrd.. Additronai't f, all data-is computed' baaedl on twoo
e`_s w'f nati'onal ye-zr=.-o'f-e>:p'ected-life-remaini'ng data
MCH.:, 10''34'1 re'siid'ent in the spreadsheet: all races
cr_anbi'ned and' whites.
3.20 DATA' SUMMA'RY
''ab~1 e 1~~.CAz ANNUAL SMDKI NG-H~TMI SUTM~LE~.
1"EraRS' QF' F'OTE"1TINL LIFE LOST (`rPLL)'
F:ELAT I VE TO EXPECTED YEAF:S OF LIFE FE"'?!5L;;!_:
New `!'crG:. Cvty (IifE' e;:p:ectancy for all r,___:
AGE C;FOUF f1A LES
FEt1ALES ' RQTH '_ E'! E' ;
_ 9`* 111_5C b:4o5 ' 1,'=71-"
_>,:
~ -4 4 1,_~r_,._ ,
.
4.a--'a.1 J1P/4
~.
- i 7?~. ~.~. _.'t~J'4
` CV7
14M.,

4.00 NEWYORK CITh':' SMOKIh1IGr-ATTR'IHU'TAEtLE
DIRECT HEALTH CARE COSTS
4.1C1 DIRECT COSTS'
:rjl~u}: ing-<ittv i',:;Lttablt-~ direi_t c7sts ira ~r,u]_`._., __ ?,...
th,e , ,?:.1.o^'',, d'.i.3g inus .1.° anld t:rC?a ,t'i71en1"_ ~f S7ic.r! ;i y-..:..._ _-_..
~1~:da~=~l ~llll iT?GLi=a1 condltlloris., r'1,11'e:_'_ l ~D`:>It._=
inedi~.= al c=.'i'e^-per'sonai'; l1e;.~1,tj-i, :`
lln .1~_lr~I'ry sUch c17st t=t='nt.e?rz _irs hGSpltct.lTze,tlGn,, SlLtr~c~tL=~i}'
L1in'Tc-=i1 care?, nttr'siny' hiome cc7re, home health c-;r_., ser:ic~~
ro+ prlmarv ph, sic.ilans and': jpecial ist:s, servic;~~ of non-
p'hysician h,,al1th practitioner-s, and medl =atiorr co=_ts.,
,?Lrrect costs al'.sn inctt_tde the "St_spport" costs o+ proaram
a.d;ni^isrration, resear'ch, public he'aTth acti:rtie~, and
maaiir_al f,~tt_i l ities constrt_iction costs,
a...riie;- =_''_tdi:es ap!plked the "mortali'ty ,_'cmparlson"
tA3f:1hi:db1'oM3'f lL!:Ce dn'tr' jL.t`lwelt.'.er, 1977; F';1't=e and Hr;d4,s''._-.
which as=_umed that the proportion u+
attr iL-1_ttab ae ;ncrta'1 it f fur 1' aryz dise;,se grrurp.=_
,~.- a arc::;y tor esti.matiny the proportron of smaL. Ln~
~it;~ rlbi_t} - afl'i r3' t~:~~t.'~,. i i re rCi=trnt.) y ~_Lpt~r ~ded' m~?t!z ;i;ci ~,~'. =r
~'1~i:~; an d' CJ11?,agU.ts s :19SJ)' applLa~ dlrect' me_is1jrc_ :at
di~f~?r er~tia'1 medical care t_ttili-ation by cur;^'ant ard
._,n.~Eers relative to never smokers. ' MeCica1 uti1l~~,ti.cn h,
a~nc4. ina st?:tt!rs was obtairred from speci al anal .se= o+
t1~Lii.~n~.T Heal'th Int'er~iew Si_tre^a erf data. The met`Icd ent,lla
=.tzps,
(1) Di fferences be+:wken smol ;Ar=_ and ne,-er smc~ ar ; 1 n
capita rates of' ut'11 ilzation of hospital carF and ph ;s; -,
services were e::amined b.: age and gender cateq,-~r-le,s ,:nd
tested f'mr stati=_ti'caI =_ignir'icance.
(~? Attributable risk., a me'asure of the ma;:irnal pr,,G~r'.i ~r
uf hospiital utllization and physiJciani servrt_es attrlb..t~:a:_
tG S,nol: tnL] waa t_al cu1 ated . The Treva1 ence r,_te usatd w.: =_ `.t,et ccinfi';.nCct
proportion of c;urr'ent and former smc~.et"S .-
jJ_i~?ntl'a,l si71~_4rc~c-~ of Ova)rrst,lifla't,lon). Pela'tl,:?, r:Sl s
0-4tCJ the attr:bU.table rls:E> farmula were srrrO~:er' C=ne_-'
=mcE,er ratios f,3r hospital' daj+= and ph'y_ici,an
;) =rc,E iny-<;ttrihUtable hospital diiz.= __ acd
r'~~~. UR1_At~-?~i]. +'~-Dr tha~* d L S:Ca~S??' rQ ur~l.:-5~ c'F 7- ~C,7~p L
85648429

.CcU'1at.=rrV ~.~ in~v 1,~:.~ p
att.ribt:rta'ble sr.I-
:~<a: tstfs f,zr tha
condi t l o rs ~.b`r aye ; g vrr.cG?r- -.±
(4? (tii3es, 17-64 ~e'ar=- 'UFre' =oiT14TY-?s ~cdtr't'ta s:lng 1e Crc f:-
r s; =ttnc ; w;t'hi a.ail:;ble t--, ealth rr.ar~ _ast dat; vt
l.3kJie ' fL,r z gr?,s 6-4 r and under at3,=c_' OL-
a ~Q
(c E-tima+lit:~n rf s;noG:i'n~-attriU+_ttabl'e dir-pct herlth -ara
crs`= wr.s acc-lt-lpltshed' using the following cor,.~ent-Lon:
-'p:t '.<Kl L',t} L e--r1,i r, i_frS:l ny hojne,, and other Fri-, teSls 1 arl-3 L
=er~ice cc_it_ u4rre estimated Usi'lllig the attributable' rls. L.~r
It:,_;pital ph:;sician ser.icas an'd' drt_ty _osts w_-r :
Asti.,natr-d tht_' attribL.itablre risl:: for physician .1s.ti-i.
Thi = procr.li,rw repre-ents an irnportant upqrade o-f =,,noG in-3-
at'tri~utat,l'e LQ'I method~.5'1oy,1, the shi.' ft from trcrtal ityr to
inurbid'i t,t rnea>.ures ~f ;d''irot_t ;.osts'. Hhwe,rer, use of
t:torbid'it/ comparisoni5 is not aComplete solutlon. Exce=_s
l;~rb:c~lty in :--_in;:;G ers is not as well, doCLlmentedb'y age,
gender, arrdl dl aqncai s code as e ccess mortal i ty. Data on use'
134"::t_Ltt7=1t1'~pnf mr?d1 =-31 ser_..iliCes 1s partl'CLIl':c;r1'V sP:4?1-ch'J.
ruurthermori:?, thP logic of cost estimation a=_=_umes that, for
a,;i ,e;-i degr~2e af i l ln?_s, smol!:er , and nons;-~
:.it ct7iTlp?ra't:e ra'tes. Thl's ass!!lTiptLC.- 1=,
m .
+ vU;-h.,+=^'t ed'' ',.- . ~loyt., artd Sch,W-?'i yzt~r'' 3 ( 1'3Q.) stLtd , u+
51C:F:ltiy, =^_'n.rci,- -t li=t C5 and Utlllzat'lon' pat'iFr'1E
_tr,11 F:uis:- r-F'erm'ar~ntheallth p1<,n picpcllatiun. ~;r . ra
~-,ad, --r-- e-rs; r.:f ~To-= hospital d~; = 1, ?r:/~J person-.ear u
=,-iri'..iyT :; t(:. n7 n=in0 V ?r=- ',1r- =s f,h'a 'n ?,'.pect'ed:l and' ;o4.1'tac;tl,-?nt
-_t:.ilL-ation' drd n';-,t difiar between current and neoer
S . Sm-;F.er swere .ess l il: el to see~ preventl.,e'
;-ai error in the appl'ica'ticin of prevalence-bas _c-, 1-1., I
,rc-:t`,'cds to lifestyl!e beha~iors such as cigarztte
:ric:ude i'1l imprecisiLn in a'ttribi-~'table r1sE! e=_tim~te=. t'~`,`'
i~ncompl'ete data on dlfferential mcrbidity for smoVers and
n,onsmokers, (3) inc~mnl~_te d'atc on p~;tt.ern= ot
util'iaation by smotring statL.ts, (4!" the gross agyr'egatlc~n n-
econQlmilc dc3ta NJhich pcj,71 s ci'..,:Sts f:-3r l:ar.~ra i_at?y:or'ies _
d'i sease rather than f or i rrd i' .1 d~taI d'l seaJe=_ . (1S ~ erri-or : n
the under'1ying tot.aL L0[1 astimates, and' (,3) error
lnt,
U; es-trapol'a'tilny from national data: to the yroup undler-
St.i-ol
:;.
(z
4.20 METHODOLOGY AND SOFTWARE OPER'AT I'ONI N'
~.
dlt . vuPP: _ed for' r9ewi _,_ -,. ~
L'-....11 .3~L'.:- Jr-i ~ ~i~T ]L "r...='L..*_ Fn.R~~A.y r~n, cc;/"~-- L:7~B t--:1 ~r~ L'1"1~-2 ~
t_~r`2 ~-. :...=r-. r ~
.;C
