Lorillard
Docket No. 4922, P. Lorillard Company
Fields
- Author
- Smith, E.L.
- Type
- LETT, LETTER
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT FILE ROOM
- Recipient (Organization)
- Perkins Daniels
- Alias
- 85641439/85641440
- Master ID
- 85641376/1456
Related Documents:- 85641376-1456 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit No. 6140 P.Lorillard Company, A Corporation, Petitioner, Against Federal Trade Commission, Respondent. Petition for Review of Cease and Desist Order Entered Against Petitioner by Federal Trade Commission Appendix
- 85641378-1380 United States of America Before Federal Trade Commission in the Matter of P. Lorillard Company, A Corporation Docket No, 4922 Modified Order to Cease and Desist
- 85641381-1387 United States of America Before Federal Trade Commission in the Matter of P. Lorillard Company, A Corporation. Docket No. 4922. Findings As to the Facts and Conclusion
- 85641388-1389 Commission's Exhibit No. 48 Cigarette Facts Unmasked by Reader's Digest Impartial Test Finds Old Gold Lowest in Nicotine Old Gold Lowest in Throat Irritating Tars and Resins
- 85641390-1391 Commission's Exhibit No. 49 Reader's Digest Exposes Cigarette Claims. Impartial Tests Find Old Gold Lowest in Nicotine and Throat Irritating Tars and Resins
- 85641392-1393 Commission's Exhibit No. 50 Are Cigarette Claims True or False?
- 85641394-1395 Commission's Exhibit No. 53 First. Among 7 Leading Brands, Impartial Tests by Reader's Digest Show Old Gold Lowest in Nicotine Lowest in Irritating Tars and Resins
- 85641396-1397 Commission's Exhibit No. 58 Citation. New Old Gold Lowest in Nicotine Lowest in Irritating Tars and Resins in Impartial Reader's Digest Tests
- 85641398 Commission's Exhibit No. 225 J. Walter Thompson Company Old Gold Program 420701 Commercial I
- 85641399 Commission's Exhibit No. 227 Old Gold Program 420715 Commercial I
- 85641400 Commission's Exhibit No. 228 Old Gold Program 420715 Commercial II
- 85641401 Commission's Exhibit No. 229 Old Gold Program 420722 Commercial I
- 85641402-1405 Cigarette Ad Facts and Fiction
- 85641406-1410 United States of America Before Federal Trade Commission in the Matter of P. Lorillard Company, Inc. Docket No. 4922 Stipulation As to the Facts
- 85641411-1412 United States of America Before Federal Trade Commission in the Matter of P. Lorillard Company, Inc. Docket No. 4922
- 85641413-1414 P. Lorillard Company, Inc., A Corporation. Docket No. 4922 Order Rescinding Approval of Stipulations and Reopening Case for Further Testimony
- 85641415-1416 United States of America Before Federal Trade Commission in the Matter of P. Lorillard Company, Inc. A Corporation. Docket No. 4922 Motion to Strike From the Record the 'order' of the Commission Dated 450602, and All Proceedings Taken Pursuant Thereto: and to Proceed to Dispose of the Proceeding Upon the Record As It Existed on 450117
- 85641417-1421 P. Lorillard Company - Docket No. 4922
- 85641422 P. Lorillard Company, Inc., Docket No. 4922
- 85641423-1427 United States of America Before Federal Trade Commission in the Matter of P. Lorillard Company, Inc. Docket No. 4922 Supplemental Stipulation As to the Facts
- 85641428
- 85641429
- 85641430 Docket 4922 P. Lorillard Company, Inc.
- 85641431-1432 Docket 4922 - P. Lorillard Co.
- 85641433-1435 Docket No. 4922 P. Lorillard Company, Inc.
- 85641436 Docket No. 4922 P. Lorillard Company
- 85641437 Docket No. 4922, P. Lorillard Company
- 85641438 Docket No. 4922 P. Lorillard Company
- 85641441 Docket No. 4922 P. Lorillard Company
- 85641442 Docket No. 4922, P. Lorillard & Company
- 85641443
- 85641444 Docket No. 4922 P. Lorillard Company
- 85641445 Docket No. 4922 P. Lorillard Company
- 85641446 Docket No. 4922, P. Lorillard Company, Inc.
- 85641447-1448 P. Lorillard Company, Inc., Docket No. 4922
- 85641449-1450 Docket No. 4922, P. Lorillard Company, Inc.
- 85641451 Docket No. 4922, P. Lorillard Company, Inc.
- 85641452 Docket No. 4922 P. Lorillard Company, Inc.
- 85641453 Docket No. 4922, P. Lorillard Company, Inc.
- 85641454 P. Lorillard Company - Docket No. 4922
- 85641455 P. Lorillard Company, Docket No. 4922
- Document File
- 85640245 /85641512 /Ftc Re: Ftc V. Lorillard (Docket 4922)
- 85640525 /85641511 /Ftc V. Lorillard (Advertising) Docket 4922 54 (J)
- 85640526 /85641510 /202d Federal Trade Commission Complaint 430302 Dorllernumber 49zz Re: Advertising
- 85640525 /85641511 /Ftc V. Lorillard (Advertising) Docket 4922 54 (J)
- Named Person
- Whiteley
- Characteristic
- EXTR, EXTRA
- Named Organization
- Readers Digest
- Date Loaded
- 20 Apr 1999
- Litigation
- Flag/Produced
- Site
- N14
- Author (Organization)
- Ftc, Federal Trade Commission
- Recipient
- Daniels, F.J.
- Brand
- Old Gold
- UCSF Legacy ID
- yrj10e00
Document Images
62
FE,DERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Washington
F. J. Daniels, E'sq.,
Perkins, Daniels,and Perkins,
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York 20, New York
March 21, 1944.
In re : Docket No. 4922,
P. LoriMrd Company.
Dear Mr. Daniels:.
Upon my return to Washington, I discussed with Mr.
Whitel'ey your letter to me dated the 24th ultimo, and your
letter to him dated the 8th instant. We suggest the elimina-
tion of the sent'encc in the lest subparagraph of Paragraph Ten,
set out ini full' in your letter of the 24th ulkimo. In the place
of that sentence, we suggest the following:
"While the tests conducted by the Readers Digest
did show that respondent's 'OLD GoLD' cigarettes con-
tained less nicotine, tars and resins than were contained
in competing brands tested, the differences inthe
amount of nicotine, tars and resins shown by said
tests were so small as not to justify the representation
that `OLD GOLDS' were the lowest in nicotine, tazs and
resins of the cigarettes mentioned in the said! article,
unless such representation also stated that the differ-
ences between the brands tested were small and that
no single brand was so superior to the competitors, be-
cause of the lesser content of nicotine, tars and resins,
as to justify its selection on the ground that it is less
harmful."
In going over the drafted st'ipul'ation agains I notice that
the word "that" beginning the first new paragraph on page 600
~
1-~
CD
I
>9

63
f
should be eliminated and that the first word of the sentence
should be the word "the". The second word' "each" in the last
sentence on page 6, the sentence being completed on the fol~
lowing page, should be eliminated, and in its place should be
substituted the word "all".
If these changes should be satisfactory to you, please advise
me and I shall have the stipulations redrafted to carry the
changes indicated, and I shall send them to you for approval
and signature.
Your letter of the 8th instant indicates that you might
wish to discuss this matter with me and with Mr. Whiteley.
If you do care to discuss the matter with us, we shall be avail-
able for such discussion the balance of this week and until
Wednesday of next week.
Yours very truly,
/S/ EDWARD L. SMITH
Edward L. Smith
