Jump to:

Lorillard

Docket No. 4922, P. Lorillard Company

Date: 21 Mar 1944
Length: 2 pages
85641439-85641440
Jump To Images
snapshot_lor 85641439-85641440

Fields

Author
Smith, E.L.
Type
LETT, LETTER
Area
LEGAL DEPT FILE ROOM
Recipient (Organization)
Perkins Daniels
Alias
85641439/85641440
Master ID
85641376/1456
Related Documents:
Document File
85640245 /85641512 /Ftc Re: Ftc V. Lorillard (Docket 4922)
85640525 /85641511 /Ftc V. Lorillard (Advertising) Docket 4922 54 (J)
85640526 /85641510 /202d Federal Trade Commission Complaint 430302 Dorllernumber 49zz Re: Advertising
Named Person
Whiteley
Characteristic
EXTR, EXTRA
Named Organization
Readers Digest
Date Loaded
20 Apr 1999
Litigation
Flag/Produced
Site
N14
Author (Organization)
Ftc, Federal Trade Commission
Recipient
Daniels, F.J.
Brand
Old Gold
UCSF Legacy ID
yrj10e00

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: yrj10e00 Log in for more options!
62 FE,DERAL TRADE COMMISSION Washington F. J. Daniels, E'sq., Perkins, Daniels,and Perkins, 30 Rockefeller Plaza„ New York 20, New York March 21, 1944. In re : Docket No. 4922, P. LoriMrd Company. Dear Mr. Daniels:. Upon my return to Washington, I discussed with Mr. Whitel'ey your letter to me dated the 24th ultimo, and your letter to him dated the 8th instant. We suggest the elimina- tion of the sent'encc in the lest subparagraph of Paragraph Ten, set out ini full' in your letter of the 24th ulkimo. In the place of that sentence, we suggest the following: "While the tests conducted by the Readers Digest did show that respondent's 'OLD GoLD' cigarettes con- tained less nicotine, tars and resins than were contained in competing brands tested, the differences inthe amount of nicotine, tars and resins shown by said tests were so small as not to justify the representation that `OLD GOLDS' were the lowest in nicotine, tazs and resins of the cigarettes mentioned in the said! article, unless such representation also stated that the differ- ences between the brands tested were small and that no single brand was so superior to the competitors, be- cause of the lesser content of nicotine, tars and resins, as to justify its selection on the ground that it is less harmful." In going over the drafted st'ipul'ation agains I notice that the word "that" beginning the first new paragraph on page 600 ~ 1-~ CD I >9
Page 2: yrj10e00 Log in for more options!
63 f should be eliminated and that the first word of the sentence should be the word "the". The second word' "each" in the last sentence on page 6, the sentence being completed on the fol~ lowing page, should be eliminated, and in its place should be substituted the word "all". If these changes should be satisfactory to you, please advise me and I shall have the stipulations redrafted to carry the changes indicated, and I shall send them to you for approval and signature. Your letter of the 8th instant indicates that you might wish to discuss this matter with me and with Mr. Whiteley. If you do care to discuss the matter with us, we shall be avail- able for such discussion the balance of this week and until Wednesday of next week. Yours very truly, /S/ EDWARD L. SMITH Edward L. Smith

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: