Lorillard
870000 State of the States
Fields
- Type
- REPT, OTHER REPORT
- Alias
- 80420370/80420446
- Site
- G65
- Area
- SPEARS/OFFICE
- Characteristic
- OVER, OVER SIZE DOCUMENT
- Litigation
- Okag/Produced
- Date Loaded
- 28 Apr 1999
- Named Organization
- Amer Cigar
- Asheville City Council
- Assn or Industries
- Bismarck Chamber of Co
- Blue Cross Blue Shiel
- Cgi
- Cincinnati Health Boa
- Citicorp
- Citizens Against Tobac
- Citizens for Courtesy
- Consolidated Cigar
- Covington Burling
- First Bank
- Flue Cured Tobacco Coo
- Fraternal Order Police
- Friends of Tobacco
- Garber Brothers
- General Cigar
- Howard Rubenstein Ass
- Intl Brotherhood Fire
- Leaf Tobacco Exporters
- Los Alamos County Cou
- Middleton Tobacco
- NC Citizens for Busine
- NC Dept of Agriculture
- NC Farm Bureau
- NC General Assembly
- NC Grange
- NC House
- NC Senate
- NC Tobacco Growers Ass
- NC Trial Lawyers Assn
- Nd House
- Nd Lung Assn
- Nd Senate
- Nd Wholesale Grocers A
- Nj Assembly
- Nj Comm on Smoking or
- Nj Gasp
- Nj Health Dept
- Nj Public Affairs Divi
- Nm Assn of Tobacco +
- Nm Hotel Motel Assn
- Nm House
- Nm Human Services Dep
- Nm Municipal League
- Nm Restaurant Assn
- Nm Retail Merchants A
- Nm Senate
- Nonpartisan League
- Norwest
- Ny Assembly
- Ny City Council
- Ny Dept of Health
- Ny Dept Tax + Finance
- Ny Legislature
- Ny Public Health Coun
- Ny Senate
- Oh House
- Oh Senate
- Ok Assn of Tobacco Di
- Ok House
- Ok Retail Tobacco Dea
- Ok Senate
- Ok State Legislature
- or Lung Assn
- or Restaurants + Beve
- Pa Assembly
- Pa Consensus Conferenc
- Pa Fire Chiefs Assn
- Pa House
- Pa House Appropriaions
- Pa House Health + Welf
- Pa Interagecy Council
- Pa Restaurant Assn
- Pa Senate
- Pa Tavern Assn
- Pa Volunteer Firefight
- Pee Dee Tobacco Wareh
- Providence Journal
- Rand
- Restaurants of or Ass
- Ri Assembly
- Ri Coalition on Smokin
- Ri Dept of Public Heal
- Ri Housing Mortgage +
- Ri Senate
- Sandia Labs
- Savarese Associates
- SC Agricultural Commod
- SC Bankers Assn
- SC Budget + Control Bo
- SC Chamber of Commerc
- SC Commission on Alch
- SC Dept Health + Envi
- SC Dept of Agricultur
- SC Farm Bureau
- SC Heart Assn
- SC House
- SC Lung Assn
- SC Restaurant Assn
- SC Tobacco Warehouse
- Southwest Bell
- Teamsters
- TI Labor Management Co
- Tn House
- Tn House Commerce Com
- Tn Press Assn
- Tn Restaurant Assn
- Tn Retail Grocers Assn
- Tn Senate
- Tn Wholesale Grocers A
- Tobacco Associates
- Tobacco Associates US
- Tobacco Growers Inform
- Tx Assn of Business
- Tx Assn of Tobacco + C
- Tx Bowling Proprietors
- Tx Cancer Council
- Tx Gas + Pipeline
- Tx Hotel Motel Assn
- Tx House
- Tx Merchandise Vendors
- Tx Restaurant Assn
- Tx Retail Grocers Assn
- Tx Senate
- US Tobacco
- Ut House
- Ut Restaurant Assn
- Ut Retailers Assn
- Ut Senate
- Ut Taxpayers Assn
- Wall Street Journal
- Women Involved in Far
- Wv Lung Assn
- Asheville City Council
- Named Person
- Cheney, R.
- Kruger, T.
- Lancaster
- Neubauer, J.
- Sullivan, M.
- Kruger, T.
- Master ID
- 80420206/0485
Related Documents: - UCSF Legacy ID
- vae00e00
Document Images
NeW Jersey, page 4
Fire Groups
In 1987 the broad issue of fire safety (not directly related to
"self-extinguishing" cigarette legislation) may become a major
issue in the state capitol. As a result, it is likely that the
subject of "self-extinguishing" cigarettes will be addressed,
too. Although there is no indication now that the issue of
"self-extinguishing" cigarettes is a major concern, it will be
followed closely in the state capitol.
Institute Resources
Legislative counsel has been extremely helpful in influencing the
legislature and securing more favorable outcomes through
amendments to severely restrictive proposals.
Helpful resources include the "Learn Not to Burn" and the
"Helping Youth Decide" programs. The Public Affairs Division has
been working closely with the business community on compliance
with the workplace smoking restriction law which became effective
on March 1, 1986.
ANTI-TOBACCO FORCES
Traditional anti-tobacco forces are very active in New Jersey.
Ms. Regina Carlson, Executive Director of New Jersey GASP, is a
thorn in our side in the legislature, lobbying on behalf of
anti-tobacco bills. She has also worked closely with the state
Health Department to promulgate guidelines to restrict smoking in
the workplace. She also serves on the Department's Commission on
Smoking or Health.
The other traditional groups, including the lung association and
the cancer society, have worked closely with members of the
legislature to promote smoking restriction legislation. However,
it is GASP which is the most visible and active anti-tobacco
organization in the state. The Commission on Smoking or Health
is also expected to urge the legislature to amend present laws to
further restrict public smoking.
TOBACCO INDUSTRY
Brief History of Successes and Problems
In 1985, a package of six smoking restriction bills were enacted.
These laws, which were first introduced eight years before, had
been amended on numerous occasions and were in such a weakened
state that most legislators felt compelled to enact the laws.
Local communities have yet to initiate legislation which is more
restrictive than the state laws.
I
C
c

c
New Jersey, page 5
The state cigarette excise tax question has not been an issue of
major concern as the state has an ad valorem surtax which has not
been increased for some time. There have been no attempts to
promote sampling or ingredients disclosure legislation, and
"self-extinguishing cigarette" legislation has not been a serious
problem in the past. It is not expected to be a problem in the
near future.
major Issues -- State and Local
The Republican Assembly takeover, the 1985 laws and the 1987
elections, make it unlikely that 1987 will be a major legislative
year for the tobacco industry. The state enjoys a budget
surplus, and as a result, taxes are not expected to be a major
concern. Our old nemesis in the Assembly, Martin Herman, was
appointed to the Federal bench and, therefore, a champion of the
anti-tobacco movement does not presently exist in the Assembly.
Outlook
1987 is expected to be a quiet legislative year for tobacco,
although legislative counsel forecasts that attempts to amend the
six restriction laws to make them more restrictive are possible.
Cigarette tax increase legislation is not expected to be a major
issue as the state enjoys a sound fiscal standard.
Local legislation will be promoted by GASP but as yet no issues
have surfaced, and localities are expected to be reluctant to go
beyond state requirements. Most local politicians feel they
should avoid the issue and blame the state for problems which
will undoubtedly arise.
December 1986
C

804203'72
~kd
I

C
NEW MEXICO
(
PREFACE
New Mexico is large geographically, but its comparatively small
population of 1.4 million ranks 27th in the nation. Ethnic
minorities figure strongly in the state's affairs: 33 percent of
New Mexicans are of Spanish origin, 7 percent are American
Indian, 2 percent are Black and 1 percent are of Asian origin.
New Mexico's share of the national cigarette market is
approximately 0.4 percent.
New Mexico's economy is largely based on its natural resources of
uranium, potash, copper, oil and gas. The federal government is
also important to the state, as some of the largest employers are
the Sandia Labs, military bases and defense contractors.
STATE OVERVIEW
Economic Condition and Outlook
New Mexico has been a part of the "Sunbelt Boom" of the past
fifteen years. Its population increased by 28 percent between
1970 and 1980, and another 9.3 percent since then. Nevertheless,
some basic economic problems remain: 17.6 percent of New
Mexicans remain below the income poverty level.
While the economy of New Mexico has recently suffered from a
decline in interest in its natural resources, the state has been
stimulated by an influx of new.industry, particularly "high-tech"
industry in the way of microchip manufacturing. In total, it can
be said that the state's economic outlook for the future is good,
especially in comparison to many neighboring states where
agricultural industries are floundering.
Political Situation
Over 60 percent of registered voters in New Mexico are Democrats.
However, two of the state's three members of Congress and one
U.S. Senator are Republicans. Democrats control the State House
of Representatives (47-23) and the State Senate (22-18).
The 1986 elections changed the composition of the New Mexico
state legislature in such a way as to dismantle the conservative
coalition which controlled both houses for the past two years.
When the legislature convenes in 1987, there will almost
certainly be changes in its leadership positions.
How this different leadership will cooperate with newly-elected
Republican Governor Gary Carruthers (who has never before held
elective office) remains to be seen.

New Mexico, page 2
Significant State Problems
In the past fiscal year, New Mexico experienced a revenue
shortfall of some $50 million; and the state legislature
addressed the problem by approving some relatively minor "revenue
enhancement" measures. Inasmuch as demand for the state's
mineral and petroleum resources remains low, tax collections on
these items will probably continue to be less than state
government needs to meet its budget. With this in mind, the 1987
legislature may again have to make adjustments in its tax
structure.
There exists among many in New Mexico a perception that the
quality of public education offered in the state is poor. In his
successful gubernatorial campaign, Gary Carruthers took advantage
of this perception and made public commitments to improve the
quality and funding of education. Carruthers may recommend major
public education reforms to the state legislature that will carry
a rather large price tag. This eventuality could very well
produce sizeable controversy in the Capitol.
RESOURCES: STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
Tobacco Segments
The only major tobacco-related organization in New Mexico is the
New Mexico Association of Tobacco and Candy Distributors. While
very small, the NMATCD has been an excellent ally of The Tobacco
Institute in past years. Association members and their executive
director, Milt Harshe, are consistently responsive to any TI
request for assistance.
Personnel of The Institute's member companies include a good
number of TAN Activists. These individuals are the major
component of The Institute's awareness system in New Mexico.
Business
Some of The Institute's best friends in New Mexico are in the
business of government, specifically city government. An
excellent relationship began several years ago between TI and the
New Mexico Muncipal League. This relationship includes Institute
participation in the NMML annual conference, involvement in other
conferences and symposia, and sometimes even assistance by NMML
members on legislative concerns. The NMML executive director,
Bill Fulginiti, is a skillful and highly-respected lobbyist in
the state capitol and is frequently cooperative with TI during
legislative sessions.

C
C
New Mexico, page 3
The New Mexico Restaurant Association has proven a valuable ally
to The Institute. NMRA leadership and members were extremely
active in the campaign against a smoking restriction proposal
placed on the 1983 Los Alamos ballot. Their efforts included
contacts with all area restaurants, distribution of "table tents"
and flyers, and development of a newspaper ad urging voters to
reject the anti-smoking proposal. The NMRA has been similarly
cooperative in fighting state level legislation.
The New Mexico Hotel/Motel Association and the New Mexico Retail
Merchants Association usually follow the lead of the Restaurant
Association and can be counted on to be fully cooperative.
Labor
Organized labor groups are neither large nor well organized in
New Mexico. While they will rarely be seen "out front" on a
tobacco-related issue, they consistently oppose any tax deemed
regressive and have provided "behind the scenes" help on
occasion. Should legislation aimed at workplace smoking ever
surface in New Mexico, labor would probably oppose it on the
premise that such matters should be an item for collective
bargaining.
Fire Groups
Firefighter organizations in New Mexico are not important lobbies
in the state capitol. The Tobacco Institute has not had occasion
to cooperate with such groups in New Mexico.
ANTI-TOBACCO FORCES
Affiliates of the American Lung Association have been the most
conspicuous agitators for smoking restriction legislation in New
Mexico. They were visible in the 1985 fight for a statewide
smoking law and were joined in their efforts by the Director of
the New Mexico Human Services Department.
Los Alamos anti-smokers are led by Leslie Ruth Olsher, a GASP
member known to TI from previous battles in the Washington, D.C.,
area. Olsher and her followers are tenacious opponents of the
tobacco industry. In 1982, when the Los Alamos County Council
rejected a GASP ordinance, Olsher successfully spearheaded a
drive to qualify the smoking restricti-0n proposal for a special
ballot election.
c

New Mexico, page 4
TOBACCO INDUSTRY
Brief History of Successes and Problems
The tobacco industry has enjoyed excellent success through the
years against proposals to increase New Mexico's cigarette tax.
The tax had remained at 12-cents per pack for seventeen years.
In 1986, New Mexico's 12 cents per pack tax was lower than any
neighboring state, save Utah which also had a 12-cent rate.
However, in 1986, the New Mexico legislature gave in to its more
influential members and approved a 3-cent per pack cigarette tax
increase to fund health research.
On January 11, 1983, voters in Los Alamos County rejected a
smoking restriction ballot issue by a 55.5 percent to 44.5
percent margin. Opponents of the ballot issue were headed by TI
field staff personnel, with a coalition called "Citizens for
Courtesy and Freedom of Choice."
In 1985, House Bill 48 proposed stringent smoking restrictions
affecting virtually all public places. Private workplaces,
retail stores, restaurants and many other private businesses were
amended out of the bill. As passed, the bill restricts smoking
in government workplaces where more than 15 employees work, in
other government-owned facilities, and in public meetings. House
Bill 48 was dramatically weakened through the work of TI
legislative counsel with assistance from the Restaurant
Association, Hotel/Motel Association and the Retail Merchandising
Association.
Major Issues -- State and Local
New Mexico antismoking groups have expressed much frustration
with House Bill 48, feeling that the smoking restriction law is
much too weak and is largely ignored. With this in mind, it is
very likely that some legislators will be persuaded to introduce
bills in 1987 designed to strengthen the existing law. Such
proposals may present a major challenge.
Given the trend toward local smoking restriction laws in
neighboring states, proposals of this sort should be anticipated
in New Mexico. Prime candidates are Albuquerque, Santa Fe, and
Las Cruces.
Outlook
Given the fact that the tobacco industry "took a hit" in the form
of a 3-cent cigarette tax like last year, it is not probable that
another tax increase will be approved in 1987. Nevertheless, it
is virtually certain that some sort of tax increase bill will be
introduced. With a favorable committee referral, though, such a
bill should not progress far.
C
I
e

C
New Mexico, page 5
An anticipated effort to strengthen New Mexico's "Clean Indoor
Air Act" in 1987 must be taken very seriously. Intensive work
with coalitions and allied individuals and groups may be required
to prevent such a bill from moving through the legislature.
There is cause for optimism in the anticipated fight against
smoking restriction laws in New Mexico cities. No such ordinance
has yet received approval in the state, and through its
involvement with the New Mexico Municipal League, TI enjoys good
relations with a large number of local officials. Battles on this
front will be very difficult for anti-smoking groups.
December 1986
(
c

I
~4/

PREFACE
New.York, second among the states in population, ranks high as an
agricultural state, as well as first among the states in
manufacturing in both number of establishments and number of
employees. Indeed, it is the industrial center of the country,
the commercial metropolis of the United States and a tourist
capital of the world.
C
New York is essentially two states -- upstate and downstate.
Upstate is rural with its fertile soil producing nearly every
kind of fruit, vegetable, grain and forage crop grown in the
temperate zone, excluding tobacco. Downstate is urban with a
diverse populace. Generally, downstate is liberal while upstate
tends to be Republican and conservative.
The second most populated city is Buffalo. It is Democratic and
its political influence is considerable when combined with the
New York City metropolitan area. A glaring example of this was
the 1982 gubernatorial election where Governor Cuomo only carried
the five boroughs of New York City, Albany County, and Erie
County (Buffalo). Cuomo's challenger received a majority of
votes in the remaining 55 counties. Obviously, New York City is
the major political force in the state. In 1986, Governor Cuomo
was reelected with 65% of the vote, the largest margin ever for a
gubernatorial candidate.
STATE OVERVIEW
Economic Condition and Outlook
The economic outlook for 1987 is bright. The state enjoyed a
revenue surplus in 1986 and indications are similar for 1987.
Due to the federal tax reform, the state is expected to generate
additional state tax increases of $2.4 billion in 1987. The
total amount of tax increase projected over the next three years
is $8.3 billion -- a figure which easily exceeds the total of all
tax reductions enacted in New York State in the last decade.
Department of Tax and Finance chairman Roderick Chu is
responsible for the administration of state tax laws and his
agency collects the bulk of all state revenues. Chu's department
prepares the Governor's recommendations for,delivery during his
State-of-the-State Address in which the Governor proposes his
general outline of activity for the year. Governor Cuomo is
expected to paint a rosy picture during his January 6th State-of-
the-State Address.

New York, page 2
The key question in the Governor's Address will be how to return
the revenue windfall from the federal reforms to New Yorkers.
Under consideration will be a reduction of the personal income
tax to a rate of 8 percent; increasing the $900 personal
exemption; corporate tax reform; and other issues of concern to
the Legislature.
The state presently collects a 21-cent per pack excise tax on
cigarettes, yielding in excess of $440 million annually. In 1985
a state sunset tax was made permanent. In 1986, the Governor did
not propose a tax increase, and no state tobacco tax increases
are expected in 1987.
The fiscal year begins April lst and expires March 31st. The
budget cycle in the New York State Legislature traditionally
begins in mid-January and concludes with the adoption of a budget
by the end of March. Unless unforeseen obstacles arise, it is
expected that the state budget will be resolved prior to April 1,
1987.
Political Situation
Legislative power in'New York State is vested by its Constitution
in a Senate of 61 members and an Assembly of 150 members. They
are elected for two-year terms.
The Legislature convenes annually in January and remains in
session until it has concluded its business.
Currently the Democrats enjoy a 96 - 54 majority in the Assembly
while the Republicans hold a 36 - 25 majority in the Senate. All
assemblymen and senators are up for re-election in 1988.
Governor Cuomo was reelected in 1986 for a four-year term but
speculation exists that he will step down to run for President.
If this occurs, Lt. Gov. Stanley Lundine would become Governor.
RESOURCES: STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
Tobacco Segments
The Tobacco Action Network (TAN) in New York State presently has
1,267 activists, of which most are member company employees.
These activists have been particularly responsive to local
legislative activities in their legislative and legislative
support efforts. This past year our TAN activists were mobilized
on numerous occasions to assist with local and statewide issues.
TAN continues to be a cornerstone for our grassroots efforts and
will remain so into 1987.
While 1986 saw only moderate response from our wholesaler,
retailer and vendor segments, an improved working relationship
during the last half of the year should create a more fruitful
and aggressive program of assistance in 1987.
(
c

New York, page 3
C
Business
The business community continues to be extremely responsive on
the issue of public smoking restriction legislation. It has not
been willing to involve itself in any other issues of interest to
the industry. A glaring weakness relates to non-activity by the
business community regarding opposition to workplace restriction
legislation. Outright workplace restrictions are not, in New
York, a motivating influence within the state's business
community.
Labor
Labor coalitions have been helpful in opposing public smoking
restriction legislation. This is true both for state and local
legislative matters. Next year promises greater levels of
activity by labor groups in the state. Through working
relationships with the Labor Management Committee and the New
York State AFL-CIO, it is expected solid cooperation will be
achieved from labor to more favorably affect adverse legislation.
Institute Resources
Legal analyses were provided by Covington & Burling, economic
impact studies by Savarese Associates, ventilation studies by
Gray Robertson's firm, public relations assistance by Howard
Rubenstein Associates, as well as scientific and medical
witnesses provided by TI Headquarters.
This office looks forward to even greater utilization of TI and
member company resources in 1987. -
ANTI-TOBACCO FORCES
In 1986, at the state level, Assemblyman Grannis, the primary
sponsor of anti-tobacco legislation, initiated a major effort to
solicit support from various health organizations throughout the
state. He was in communication with county health departments,
boards of health and other health related associations. Because
of our success in the state legislature in defeating anti-tobacco
legislation over the past nine years, Assemblyman Grannis is
attempting to motivate localities to introduce and adopt local
legislation.
In 1987 it is expected that anti-tobacco forces will push local
legislation and support Public Health Council regulations. GASP,
the lung association and the cancer society are teaming their
forces to conduct an all-out push on local legislative and
regulatory efforts. Additionally, in 1986, they collectively
retained a state lobbyist to promote smoking restriction
legislation and other health-related issues.

New York, page 4
There is little doubt that anti-tobacco forces are more
sophisticated in their approach to promoting anti-tobacco
legislation. 1987 promises to be a much more difficult
legislative year locally as a result of the anti's determina-
tion to promote anti-tobacco legislation and regulations.
TOBACCO INDUSTRY
Brief History of Successes and Problems
New York State is fortunate to enjoy the presence of three major
tobacco companies and several subsidiaries of these companies.
The support provided by these companies has been most valuable in
assisting at the state and local levels. They have been
cooperative and diligent in committing resources.
Local legislation continues to be one of the major problems
facing the industry. It is expected numerous localities will
begin consideration of such legislation. In the state capitol, it
is expected that no major legislative proposals will be adopted.
We have had success in opposing excise tax legislation and that
area will not be troublesome in the near future.
The Public Health Council will be our most serious problem in
early 1987. By working with the Legislature we hope to remove
the Council's supposed authority to enact a statewide regulation.
Major Issues -- State and Local
In 1985, the 6-cent per pack increase in the cigarette excise tax
passed in 1983 was made permanent. No other statewide
legislation has been approved by the legislature.
For the first time in nine years, an onerous public smoking
restriction bill failed to be approved by the Assembly. Problems
exist in two areas, however. The Public Health Council's
proposed regulations could be implemented as early as mid-April.
Therefore, a major effort will be made to prompt legislative
action to preempt this Public Health Council activity.
Our second major problem area will occur in New York City where
Major Koch is actively supporting.a citywide restriction
regulation. Hearings are expected early in the year and every
effort will be made to have the City Council defeat any
restriction regulations. A move to increase the city's local
cigarette tax is also anticipated.
Assemblyman Grannis' "policy bill" is also expected to be
reintroduced and receive legislative consideration should the
Public Health Council issue be deflected by the Legislature.
Grannis is also expected to press on other fronts -- the "I smell
blood" theory. Sampling, advertising, "self-extinguishing" and
ingredients disclosure legislation are all expected.
C
e

(
New York, page 5
Outlook
In the final analysis, 1986 has been a most difficult year. Next
year will be as difficult. Statewide and local legislation and
regulations will be promoted early and often.
Other major issues in 1987: ingredients disclosure, advertising
prohibitions, sampling prohibition, "self-extinguishing"
cigarettes and product liability legislation. The New York State
Department of Health will continue to promote a major campaign
for smoking restrictions in public places and workplaces.
Local legislative battles will arise in such locales as Buffalo,
Rochester, Syracuse, Albany, Westchester, Saratoga and New York
City. It is expected that at least a handful of other localities
will initiate legislation.
December 1986

I
80420,184
.

NORTH CAROLINA
PREFACE
North Carolina has a population of 5.9 million. Because of
ramifications in neighboring states, cigarette tax proposals in
North Carolina are dealt with swiftly and comprehensively.
There are members of the North Carolina General Assembly who
would increase the cigarette tax. There are also a few who would
place restrictions on the use of our product in North Carolina.
North Carolina's market share is 3.4 percent.
STATE OVERVIEW
Economic Condition and Outlook
The budget fo-r fiscal 1986-87 is based on a 6.5-6.8 percent
growth in North Carolina's economy over fiscal year 1985-86. This
growth should bring in $3-4 hundred million in new revenue. Most
of the money is scheduled for education programs. The revenue
projections have been adjusted downward to a 6 percent growth
rate. That means a $40-50 million dollar shortfall for budgeted
programs. The overall effect is all departments. are being asked
to prepare two budgets. One is to be at 97 percent of the base,
the other at 100 percent. The outlook is not bright. 'If the
revenue drops further, the legislature may have to look at some
taxes.
Political Situation
At the federal level, Terry Sanford (D) upset Broyhill (R) for
the U.S. Senate race. This brings a Democrat who will be pro
tobacco. In the House, Lancaster (D), Price (D), Ballenger (R)
and Clarke (D) were elected.
At the state level the Senate leadership is undecided. There are
two strong candidates vying for majority leader. We may see some
strange alliances next session. There should not be any problems
for tobacco. In the House there has been an effort by a small
group of representatives to change the rules and perhaps elect a
new speaker. The outcome will probably be some bruised egos.
while leadership changes very little this session we have friends
on both sides of the fence in the House, therefore, we remain
neutral. Tobacco should not be greatly affected.
C

North Carolina, page 2
Significant State Problems
There are several-issues of interest to business that may be
considered during the upcoming 1987 legislative session.
o Workers Compensation - The state Trial Lawyers
Association is interested in changing the present law
which the business community feels is sufficient.
o Tort Law - The Trial Lawyers Association is also
interested in establishing a "comparative fault"
doctrine in place of the present contributory
negligence, which would adversely affect business.
o Environmental Issues - The present state law provides
that no state standards will exceed Federal standards.
Attempts are being made to change the present law to
increase certain state environmental standards.
o The lottery, which failed on a close vote last session,
will be brought back up this session. It could be a
vehicle which provides the revenue to overcome the
- projected shortfalls.
RESOURCES: STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
Tobacco Segments _
All segments of the tobacco industry are present in North
Carolina. -Each is represented by an organization or association.
The Tobacco Institute staff'has been fortunate to maintain good
relationships with all groups.
Growers organizations include:
N. C. Farm Bureau
N. C. Grange
Tobacco Growers Information Committee
The Tobacco Growers Association of N. C.
Flue-Cured Tobacco Cooperative Stabilization Corp.
Leaf Tobacco Exporters Association, Inc.
Tobacco Associates Tobacco Association of the U. S.,
~+
O
The N. C. Department of Agriculture has always been a staunch
advocate for tobacco. The commissioner has dedicated time and
staff to the protection of tobacco.
N. C. enjoys the residence of six cigarette or tobacco
manufacturing plants. In the past each manufacturer has played a
role in the preservation of our industry. From the seedbed to
the supermarket our industry is well represented.
e

(
c
North Carolina, page 3
Business
There has been little need in recent times"to utilize business
allies in state legislative battles. Since the influence of the
tobacco industry blankets a wide variety of business interests
such as banking, the retail trade, chemical companies, paper
manufacturers, etc., this resource can be effective.
North Carolina Citizens for Business and Industry represents
business in state legislative matters and should be considered a
strong ally on issues of concern to The Institute.
Labor
Labor is not considered a strong resource at the state level and
has not been utilized.
Institute Resources
Our lobbyists have been very effective in the state legislature.
The "Friends of Tobacco," which TI finances, was created for a
legislative support program. It used members and officers of the
various farm organizations to contact state legislators on a
regular basis as well as during a crisis.
ANTI-TOBACCO FORCES
Anti-tobacco forces have been active in Raleigh, Greensboro and
Charlotte. We can expect to hear from them in future sessions.
TOBACCO INDUSTRY
Brief History of Successes and Problems
Throughout the years, all segments of the tobacco industry have
stood strongly in opposition to cigarette taxes and restrictions
at the state and local levels. Last year there was some division
in the ranks because of the anticipated need for revision of the
tobacco allotment program. Most of those problems have been
worked out at the congressional level. Some strong feelings
still remain in certain areas of North Carolina; however, we feel
they can be resolved through good efforts and show of faith on
the part of manufacturers and the farm community.
Major Issues - State and Local
There is a remote possibility we might see the manufacturers tax
introduced again in North Carolina. However, indications from
leadership are that if such a tax is introduced it will not fair
well.

North Carolina, page 4 ( 1
t
There is a small possibility we will see a smoking restriction
bill at the state level. If so this will be brought about by
efforts of the American Lung Association. We expect them to push
their efforts at the local levels.
Asheville is the only locality to consider a smoking restriction
ordinance in the 1980's. In 1984, the Asheville City Council
passed an ordinance to restrict smoking in elevators and certain
areas of hospitals. The original proposal called for
restrictions in retail stores and other public places, but our
efforts helped weaken the ordinance.
The mayor of Asheville stated publicly that the ordinance was a
fire prevention measure considered at the request of the fire
chief and not an anti-tobacco efforts.
Outlook -
Leadership has indicated that they will work with us to prevent
adverse legislation. We are beginning to rebuild our coalitions
this year. If we are as successful as we should be, the tobacco
industry will remain strong in North Carolina.
December 1986 -

0
80420?89
I

`
(
North Dakota is one of the world's largest wheat producers. Only
the state of Kansas produces more wheat than North Dakota. North
Dakota's population over the past 70 years has not changed
drastically. During the early part of the 1900's, North Dakota
had 632,000 people; by 1970 its population actually dropped to
617,000. Today, North Dakota has a population of 670,000 and a
market share of less than three-tenths of one per cent.
North Dakota's political history is unique. Norwegians settled
the eastern part of the state while Germans settled the west.
This mix of ethnic backgrounds produced the famous Nonpartisan
League (NPL), a political movement overtly socialistic. This
political group proposed governmental ownership of grain
elevators and railroads. To this day, North Dakota maintains a
state-owned grain elevator service and a state-owned bank.
North Dakota, until the mid-1970's, was considered an
agricultural, livestock, and surprisingly, a noted center of
sophisticated defense systems (the bulk of the United States
Titan Missile strength is located in silos near Minot).
STATE OVERVIEW
Economic Condition and Outlook
North Dakota's economic condition is generally good with notable
exceptions due to interdependent economic conditions outside of
North Dakota. North Dakotans, as a people, are extremely
conservative and tend not to overextend themselves. This
conservatism carries through to their view of government
intervention in their daily lives.
A case in point is the North Dakota oil industry, an industry of
major proportions several years ago. During the "Arab oil
crisis," known reserves of oil were explored and exploited,
producing major revenues for North Dakota's economy. However,
due to the world-wide oil glut of the 1980's, demand for North
Dakota's oil fell. As a consequence.,.prices for oil decreased,
making oil production in North Dakota unprofitable. Other states
would have overly projected the potential revenues of this new
found resource, but not the people of North Dakota. Although
anticipating major revenues, the legislature was relatively
prudent in its income projections, facing only moderate budget
shortfalls in the wake of a potentially disastrous budget
dilemma.

North Dakota, page 2
The outlook for the North Dakota economy can be termed-
"tentative." There is very little doubt that a major Mid-East
oil crisis could reactivate the North Dakota oil industry.
Unfortunately, with oil selling for barrel prices in the low 20s,
there is very little impetus for North Dakota oil production.
Political Situation: Current and Outlook
If "no man and his property are safe when the legislature is in
session," the people of North Dakota are relatively safe due to
North Dakota's unusual 80-day biennial legislative session.
The North Dakota legislature did not meet in 1986; it will meet
in 1987. However, Democratic Governor George Sinner called the
North Dakota legislature into special session during the first
part of December 1986 to address budget shortfalls.
Incumbent Democrat Governor George Sinner did not face election
during 1986. He upset the Republican incumbent in 1984.
The State Senate, previously controlled by the Republicans, may
now be controlled by a single seat by the Democrats, due to a
one-vote victory by Larry Schoenwald. A recount is underway;
however, Schoenwald appears to be gaining votes, albeit, slowly.
The North Dakota House of Representatives will still be
controlled by the Republicans, although they lost 5 seats in the
general election, lowering their majority to 60-46.
In elections for U. S. Senate and the at-large Congressional
seat, incumbent GOP U. S. Senator Mark Andrews was defeated by
relative unknown Kent Conrad. Conrad, originally a distinct
underdog, took 51% of the vote.
Significant State Problems
North Dakota faces the following problem areas during the next
biennium:
Funding of a coal gasification plant. This plant is being
temporarily funded and could cease operation, causing major
unemployment and revenue reductions.
The farm economy, although more stable than surrounding states,
faces the withdrawal of banking services in rural areas due to
the increasing debt crisis in Iowa and Minnesota. Interstate
banks such as First Bank and Norwest, are closing many rural
branches.
~
Petroleum production. With extremely low oil prices, the oil
industry of North Dakota is literally at a stand still.
C

C
c
North Dakota, page 3
Nuclear waste dumps. An ongoing argument regarding the placement
of high-level nuclear waste dumps in North Dakota.
RESOURCES: STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
Tobacco Segments
There is no tobacco production in the state of North Dakota. The
industry's presence is noted via the tobacco wholesalers and
retailers.
The North Dakota wholesalers, although a small organization, have
been extremely helpful in providing a grassroots political base
for the industry. The association's conventions are well
attended and enthusiasm is considerable.
Business
The North Dakota business community worked very closely with the
tobacco industry during the past legislative session on the issue
of the federal excise tax contingency legislation. The defeat of
this particular bill, and the participation of the North Dakota
Wholesaler Grocers Association and the Bismarck Chamber of
Commerce and Industry, demonstrated support for our industry
beyond the tobacco family.
Labor
Labor's presence in North Dakota is minimal.
Institute Resources
The Tobacco Institute's retention of lobbyists as well as its
honoraria program and membership in statewide business groups
plays a vital role in our legislative profile in North Dakota.
Additionally, the increase in the Institute's contribution to the
North Dakota wholesalers association, will pay dividends.
ANTI-TOBACCO FORCES
The most surprising aspect of the anti-tobacco forces in North
Dakota is their mere existence. In a state which prides itself
on non-interventionist governmental po-licy, the North Dakota Lung
Association can be termed unrelenting. This particular group
meets monthly with the GASP chapter at Lung Association
headquarters in Bismarck. Its membership frequently visits the
State Capitol during hearings and legislative briefings.
C

North Dakota, page 4
The Lung Association of North Dakota boasts 500 activists and is
apparently well-funded with a comparatively sophisticated
membership program.
Additionally, Lt. Governor Ruth Meyers, a cancer victim, has
spurred the legislature into a position of recommending anti-
tobacco legislation. This situation, more than any other, has
the potential of affecting our legislative presence as well as
prejudicing the attitude of the state legislature against our
.industry.
The Lung Association consists of extremely zealous citizens. They
are somewhat outrageous, boisterous, cooperative and
indefatigable. Last year, it was this group, at a hearing last
winter in Bismarck, that pointed to tobacco industry lobbyists
and shouted, "How can you sleep, you merchants of death?"
TOBACCO INDUSTRY
Successes and Problems - History
Our efforts in North Dakota were successful during the past
session in 1985: defeat of the Clean Indoor Air bill and the
proposed 8-cent federal excise tax contingency.
Events of the 1987 legislative session may be related to the
outcome of the December special session. North Dakota faces
severe problems due to the fact that much of its budgeting and
revenue projections depend on the oil severance tax. Oil revenues
are in a depressed state; therefore, the North Dakota legislature
will be searching everywhere for extra revenue. The legislature
did not address the cigarette excise tax during the special
session, thus is very likely to consider an increase in January.
Major Issues - State and Local
The following issues will be at the forefront of our legislative
program in 1987:
Clean Indoor Air Act. The Lung Association has already drawn the
battle lines so our task is clear.
Tax Increase. Due to projected state budget shortfalls, a tax
increase looms on the horizon.
Outlook
The outlook for North Dakota during 1987 is guarded. Our concerns
rest with the onset of a special session to rectify any budget
shortfalls. With this in mind, it is our opinion that careful
analysis be given to budget projections in North Dakota and an
immediate response to those projections.
e
December 1986

80420,194.
I

(
OHIO
(
PREFACE
Ohio's industrial, economic and political base is similar to that
of other large industrial states in the northeast. Politically
the parties and general public are considered moderate to
conservative.
The state's population numbers 10.7 million; it has a market
share of 4.9 percent.
STATE OVERVIEW
Economic Condition and Outlook
Upturns in the national economy have been reflected in the state.
Agriculture remains the state's leading industry. Cities
dependent on heavy manufacturing still suffer the greatest
unemployment; however, the state as a whole has a good economic
outlook.
Political Situation
Traditionally, the political spectrum of the state is mixed. Of
twenty-one U.S. Representatives, eleven are Democrats and ten are
Republicans. Both U.S. Senators are liberal Democrats. The
State Senate remains Republican (18-15) and the House of
Representatives Democratic (60-39). No major changes are
expected regarding leadership posts or committee chairmanships,
with the exception of the appointment of a new House Health and
Retirement Committee Chairman. All statewide offices remain in
control of Democrat incumbents.
Significant State Problems
At the end of 1986 the General Assembly passed major changes in
tort reform; however, Governor Celeste opposed the product O
liability provisions in the measure (SB-330) and vetoed it.
Additional activity on the issue may occur in early 1987. The
state may also choose to reduce income taxes to reflect changes
in federal tax reporting. The Speaker of the House has promised w
no new taxes for 1987. W
RESOURCES - STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
°r.
Tobacco Segments
The tobacco family remains extremely supportive and has taken on
additional responsibilities, including local and federal
mobilization activities.

Ohio, page 2
Business -
Many new business allies have emerged, especially in light of
increased activities at the local level. These include
manufacturers, financial institutions, local restaurant and
tavern associations. Statewide trade associations have remained
supportive; however, due to our final stance against passage of
SB-330 (tort reform/product liability) ally rebuilding activities
will be an absolute necessity during early 1987.
Labor
Last year we intensified efforts to improve relations with AFSCME
and to create contacts with the Fraternal Order of Police.
During 1987 we will target Teamsters and heavy labor for
increased contacts.
Fire Groups
We have enjoyed excellent relations with the International
Brotherhood of Professional Firefighters. We will attempt to
further improve relations in 1987. __
ANTI-TOBACCO FORCES
GASP has emerged as the leading proponent of anti-tobacco
legislation. In 1986 GASP leaders authored and/or advocated
legislation in at least eight localities. Contention for the
statewide president's office has created a great deal of
competition among local chapters.
Ahron Leichtman, president of C.A.T.S. (Citizens Against Tobacco
Smoke), a local organization, is spearheading an effort to make
this a national organization under his direction. He is
attempting to recruit the lung association, cancer association
and various medical associations as acting members into this new
organization, which has the same goals as GASP. To our knowledge
he has been unsuccessful; however, he is very influential with
the Cincinnati Health Board and can take credit for the Health
Board regulation passed in 1985.
TOBACCO INDUSTRY
Brief History of Successes and Problems
At the state level, the only major issue adopted in 1986 allows
voters in Cuyahoga County (Cleveland) to vote to impose a local
excise tax on cigarettes to support the building of a domed
stadium.
(
C

(
C
Ohio, page 3
Local restriction legislation increased dramatically during the
year, with the greatest new threat being posed by the activities
of non-elected health boards. Should Ahron Leichtman be
successful with the anti-smoking video program that we understand
he has presented to the Cincinnati Health Board for their
endorsement and financial assistance, we can expect more health
board action throughout the state.
Major Issues - State and Local
At the state level in 1987, we anticipate the introduction of
legislation regarding cigarette excise taxes, O.T.P. taxes,
smoking restrictions, sampling and advertising bans, as well as a
possible clove cigarette prohibition.
Due to our previous success at defeating statewide smoking
restrictions, GASP and others will attempt to introduce local
legislation before city councils and health boards at an
unprecedented rate.
Outlook
If during early 1987 we are successful at rebuilding legislative
and coalition relations damaged during tort reform activities, we
should be successful at defeating or tabling most of our
statewide legislative threats. At the local level, health boards
and the simple volume of localities undertaking smoking
restrictions will be detrimental. Cuyahoga County may 4lso
consider a local excise tax on the public ballot. Though the
volume of legislation has increased dramatically, we anticipate a
continuation of our successful record of defeating anti-tobacco
measures in Ohio.
December 1986
~

%0
8042p398
-1
w
I

OKLAHOMA
C
PREFACE
Oklahoma, with a 1984 population of 3 million, accounts for about
1.5 percent of the nation's cigarette market. It is a
conservative state in many respects, giving Ronald Reagan huge
majorities in 1980 and 1984, despite the fact that 68 percent of
Oklahoma voters are registered Democrats.
Despite its American Indian heritage, only 5 percent of
Oklahoma's citizens are Indian. They are concentrated in the 2nd
Congressional district (Northwest quadrant of the state), giving
that district the largest number of American Indians of any
Congressional district in the nation.
Any question of which industry is most important to Oklahoma is
answered as soon as one views the state capitol. Active oil
wells are pumping on the capitol plaza itself. Oil, gas and
agriculture are without question the most important elements of
Oklahoma and its character.
STATE OVERVIEW
Economic Condition and Outlook
Like other states that depend on petroleum and agriculture,
Oklahoma is in serious trouble. The state has experienced a
disastrous drop in income tax collections, gasoline tax revenues,
and sales taxes collected.
The reasons for this desperate situation are simple: a farm
economy in dire straits and a stagnant oil industry. Each time
the price of crude oil falls $1.00, the Oklahoma treasury loses
$11 million. Simply put, Oklahoma's financial future can only be
expected to get worse unless the price of oil rises dramatically
and the agricultural industry receives some very good news.
Political Situation
After the recent elections, Democrats remain in firm control of
the Oklahoma legislature; but the Republican party did make some
impressive inroads. The Democratic majority in the State Senate
has been reduced to 31-17 with the election of 15 new senators
this year. Thus, vetos by Republican Governor Henry Bellmon
could be sustained. The House of Representatives holds a firm
70-31 Democratic edge.
Governor..Bellmon is hardly an unknown quantity. He is a former
U.S. Senator and was a two-term governor in the 1960's. His
conservative bent is expected to chafe the legislative leadership
and result in some interesting battles.

Oklahoma, page 2
Significant State Problems
Desperate for funds to keep the state operating and to achieve a
constitutionally-mandated balanced budget, Oklahoma legislators
must totally restructure methods of raising revenue. In 1987,
legislators will also be required to deal with "right to work"
and workers' compensation issues that have the state's unions and
industries in conflict. Finally, there will be many insistent
farmers asking for help with their problems, not the least of
which is a serious water shortage in western counties.
RESOURCES: STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
Tobacco Segments
The Oklahoma Association of Tobacco Distributors, until three
years ago, suffered from inertia and sometimes even seemed to be
working in opposition to The Tobacco Institute on key issues.
However, changes in OATD leadership and improved relationships
with TI representatives have resulted in a strong and effective
alliance. In recent months, the OATD has upgraded its staff by
hiring as its legislative counsel, former chief House clerk
Richard Huddleston. Mary Thurber, who has done such a fine job
as executive director for the Colorado Association of Tobacco and
Candy Distributors, has also been retained by the OATD to handle
its administrative concerns. These moves will unquestionably
enhance OATD's presence in the Capitol and make it an even closer
friend of The Institute.
Oklahoma's vendors have no state association. Nevertheless,
until about three years ago, TI enjoyed excellent cooperation
with several major vendors in the state. Unfortunately, this
relationship has seriously deteriorated, primarily because of
what the vendors view as untimely and unnecessary price increases
by the tobacco companies. A great deal of time and attention
will be needed to repair this relationship.
A few years ago, an effort was made to organize tobacco retailers
in Oklahoma. The Oklahoma Retail Tobacco Dealers Association was
founded by a group of tobacconists in Oklahoma City and showed a
great deal of promise in its first year. Unfortunately the ORTDA
lost its aggressive leaders, suffered from a lack of funds and is
now more or less defunct. Time and funds permitting, it could be
worthwhile for TI to help re-activate this association.
TI member company TAN Activists have been a major asset in
Oklahoma through the years. They form the bulk of The
Institute's "awareness system" in the state and can be counted on
for grassroots political action on very short notice.
(
(
~
{~

C
(
C
`
Oklahoma, page 3
Business
The Tobacco Institute has received little or no assistance in the
past from business-related organizations in Oklahoma. This is an
area deserving of considerable attention in the future. The use
of contacts within the TI member company subsidiaries in the
state would be productive in improving this situation.
Labor
Organized labor is not among the more effective lobbies in the
state. Nevertheless, labor can and should be encouraged to
cooperate with TI, particularly on excise tax issues. This,
however, may be difficult in 1987 because "right to work" and
workers compensation legislation will be occupying virtually all
of labor's time and attention.
Fire Groups
Firefighter groups are not well-organized or very visible
lobbyists in Oklahoma. The Tobacco Institute has not had
occasion to become involved with them in the past several years.
ANTI-TOBACCO FORCES
Groups interested in pursuing passage of smoking restrictions are
either assuming a low profile or are virtually nonexistent.
Affiliates of the American Cancer Society and the American Lung
Association have proposed legislation at the state level, but not
much activity has been seen at the local level. However, such
efforts are just now beginning in Edmond and Tulsa, where some
members of the medical community have begun to agitate for
ordinances.
TOBACCO INDUSTRY
Brief History of Successes and Problems
No piece of smoking restriction legislation has ever been voted
on by either house of the Oklahoma State Legislature, although a
few attempts have been made. Likewise, no local smoking
restriction has yet passed in the state.
Oklahoma increased its cigarette tax from 13 to 18-cents per pack
in 1979, the first increase in eleven years. When the state
legislature passed an omnibus tax package in 1985 (the largest
tax increase in the state's history) the bill called for a
cigarette tax increase only if the federal government decreased
its tax. On the downside of the taxing issue, legislation was
passed in 1984 making cigarettes subject to the state sales tax.
In 1986, a bill proposing a cigarette tax increase to fund health
research was defeated.

Oklahoma, page 4
`
Major Issues -- State and Local
Oklahoma's massive budget shortfalls constitute the major concern
that will face state government in 1987. Other key legislation
facing legislators next year deals with "right to work" and
proposals to increase workers' compensation.
Recent activity by local anti-smoking groups and attendant
publicity serve as indicators that efforts at passing local
smoking restriction ordinances will probably begin in earnest
during 1987. Probable targets are Tulsa, Edmond, Oklahoma City,
and Bartlesville.
Outlook
Given the seriousness of Oklahoma's fiscal crisis, it is
virtually certain that tax increase legislation will be
introduced, and it stands a good chance of passage.
Smoking restriction legislation of some sort is also expected in
Oklahoma but should be contained in committee. Local smoking
ordinances are expected to be proposed in several Oklahoma
municipalities during 1987 and may produce significant
challenges.
December 1986

80420403
V
.J

C
OREGON
(
PREFACE
1.09 per cent*.
With a population estimated at 2.7 million, Oregon delights at
its image as the most environmentally concerned and politically
progressive state in the Northwest. Oregon's share of market is
E.
STATE OVERVIEW
Economic Condition and Outlook
Oregon's economy is, as in its neighbor Washington, in a state of
transition. It is suffering from a serious downturn in timber
economy and is becoming a high tech and computer technology
state. Beyond that comparison the similarities end. Oregon does
not have the stable agricultural economic base of Washington, nor
does it have anything resembling Washington's aerospace or
military economy. Oregon does not have a sales tax; therefore
the state depends largely on an extremely high property tax and a
high personal income tax to fund state programs.
An effort was made this year to add a sales tax to the state's
sources of revenue. However, this effort was soundly defeated by
the electorate at the polls in November. Oregon will, therefore,
have to continue to fund its relatively liberal state programs
with narrow individual taxes, user fees and excise taxes.
Political Overview
In the race for Governor, Democrat Neil Goldschmidt was elected
by a margin of 53-47 per cent over Republican Norma Paulus.
Goldschmidt's election can be termed "no worse" for the tobacco
industry. It should be noted that Goldschmidt, as was the case
with Governor Andrus of Idaho, also served in the Carter
Administration. Mr. Goldschmidt served as Secretary of
Transportation.
With regard to legislative races, 3 Democratic House incumbents
were defeated. However, the Democrats will maintain control of
the lower house by a margin of 31-29. ,
In the Oregon state Senate, the Democrats will maintain their
majority with a margin of 17-13.
United States Senator Bob Packwood (R-OR) was easily reelected.
C

Oregon, page 2
Significant State Problems
Oregon's most significant problem at this stage is its revenue
base. Granted, the timber industry's problems and-a relatively
slow-growth economy are important. However, with a narrow
economic base the state needs to address its priorities in terms
of government spending vs. its lack of a broad-based sales tax.
Since the voters overwhelmingly rejected a sales tax, it appears
the legislature will have to continue to take a"band-aid"
approach to funding. Realization of this problem has not slowed
the proponents of increased state spending for education, state
employees salaries, additional local services and improved state
human services programs.
RESOURCES: STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
Tobacco Segments
What Oregon lacks in an organized wholesaler group it makes up
for in active, cooperative and effective tobacco family support
in the vending industry. The distributors association is
basically non-existent, having been deactivated about ten years
ago. On the other hand, there are several vendors in the state
who can always be counted on to support us in our legislative
efforts. In addition, there are some very active and able member
company employees, who in the past, have been quite willing to
lend considerable effort to our legislative problems.
Business
The Association of Oregon Industries (AOI) is the state's most
significant business organization. It has, in the past, been
ambivalent to our problems. One of the reasons for this is the
large membership of big retailers who would prefer to see state
regulation of smoking in their retail establishments, and large
timber interests who would prefer to see taxes raised from any
source other than their industry. Because of some economic
changes in the state, as well as a change of leadership at AOI,
this organization now appears to be in a position to assist us
more strongly in our efforts in the future.
We enjoy a close working relationship with the two major
hospitality groups, Restaurants of Oregon Association (ROA) and
Oregon Restaurant and Beverage Association (ORBA). These two
groups have been helpful to us politically, have had tobacco
industry spokespeople at their conventions and continue to be
concerned about how tobacco legislation will affect their
members.
C
e

(
(
Oregon, page 3
Labor
Organized labor is an exceedingly important legislative power in
Oregon. We have in the past enjoyed a good working rapport with
labor's capitol lobbyists, particularly on issues such as
workplace restrictions. However, our industry's relationship
with labor still leaves a lot'to be desired. We have good
contacts with a strong teamster local in Portland that has been
considered close to the state employees' legislative
representative during past sessions. Additionally, there is a
small Bakery, Confectionary and Tobacco Workers local in
Portland; however, we have not yet been able to build a
relationship with that organization.
ANTI-TOBACCO FORCES
The major anti-tobacco organization in Oregon is the Oregon Lung
Association. It has had intense support from one particular
state legislator. It is primarily this legislator's efforts,
coupled with Oregon's commonly-accepted environmentalist
attitude, that poses the greatest threat to the tobacco industry.
This is the state that prides itself on leading the Nation in
populist legislative causes such as bottle restrictions,
anti-fluorocarbon legislation, wood stove restrictions and any
other "socially progressive" legislation that will make Oregon
stand out from its large neighbor to the south.
TOBACCO INDUSTRY
Brief History
The Oregon Indoor Clean Air Act was passed in 1981, building on
laws passed since 1973. There had been virulent anti-tobacco
efforts at the state legislature as well as at local levels for a
number of years. Since the Act was passed, there have been no
local efforts at restricting the use of tobacco products in
public places, and the state legislature appears willing to wait
to see how effective the 1981 act will be.
Excise taxes in Oregon have always been popular, partly because
of the state's limited tax base. However, the Oregon legislature
also enjoyed the revenues that the state received from sales of
tobacco products in border communities such as Portland. With a
relatively low tax (9 cents) from 1972 through 1981, sales to
Washington residents generated considerable revenue for the
state.
In 1981, however, the legislature raised the excise tax by ten
cents and no longer appeared to appreciate the benefits of having
a lower tax than its neighbor states. During those ten years,
excise taxes on alcoholic beverages and beer and wine sales also
were raised to levels above the national average.

Oregon, page 4
In the 1985 session the Oregon legislature passed legislation to
increase the state's cigarette excise tax by eight cents, no
matter what Congress might do with the sunset. The public
statements made by the legislature during that session were,
"..Congress has promised to sunset the federal excise tax,
therefore, if they don't lower the federal tax it's Congress'
fault for raising people's cigarette taxes." Accordingly, Oregon
now has a tax that is among the nation's highest.
Outlook: Major Issues - State and Local
Largely due to the defeat of the state sales tax efforts in 1985
and 1986, the legislature had to re-evaluate its priorities as
well as make an effort to re-balance the budget for the biennium.
This will.be a continuing bone of contention during the 1987-88
biennium. There were new pressures put upon the legislature
during the 1985 legislative session which were "held off" until
the referendum on the sales tax. State employee salary hikes,
infra-structure funding problems and increased costs of social
service programs, will all require funding attention by the
legislature.
December 1986
C
C

i
80420408

`
C
C
Pennsylvania is, in virtually every sense, a keystone state. From
the standpoint of culture, politics, climate, economy, and
geography, Pennsylvania presents within its boundaries a
transition and contrast with respect to the nation's concern with
the smokestack industries and the high tech revolution. Also,
the rise and fall of political party fortunes and labor's wane
provide a dramatic impact on the population of 11.5 million.
There are several opposing economic and political forces in
Pennsylvania that combine to make the state as unique socially as
it is geographically. These opposing forces make it difficult to
pigeon-hole the state as liberal or conservative, industrial or
agrarian. Thus, Pennsylvania is a key state in gauging political
and social trends. Its geographic position (it shares borders
with six other states) demands that Pennsylvania be given
attention by any group interested in a national political
strategy and very close scrutiny by those interested in
Mid-Atlantic or regional strategy.
STATE OVERVIEW
Economic Condition and Outlook
Economic conditions vary considerably from area to area.
Pennsylvania presents the contrasts of heavily industrialized
urban communities of waning economic clout, revitalized service
industry-oriented suburbs and rural farming communities.
Pennsylvania is currently experiencing transition pains as it
attempts to weather the crisis of a failing industrial base and
"retools" for a high tech future. The displacement of labor is
particularly acute in the western Pennsylvania areas of
Pittsburgh, the Mon Valley, Johnstown and Clarion. The
Philadelphia/Delaware Valley area has, however, met this
challenge well and is in the forefront of commerce and high tech
industries.
Pennsylvania's agricultural population'has decreased over the
last several years, but the state is still a leading producer of
milk, potatoes, poultry and various fruits. The agriculture
industry in Pennsylvania is comprised of 62,000 farm families
selling more than $2.6 billion in crops and livestock. It also
has the largest rural population of any state in the country.
!

Pennsylvania, page 2
The outlook shows Pennsylvania moving from coal, steel, and
apparel production to electronics-based service orientation. Any
corresponding tax base deterioration will be reflected in further
attempts to increase the excise tax on cigarettes.
The state budget process officially begins in February with the
Governor's State-of-the-State Report. It ends June 30, 1987,
when a 1987-1988 budget must be adopted. On several occasions
the state's budget has been embroiled in politics and has not
been adopted until after June 30.
Political Situation
Legislative power in Pennsylvania is vested by its Constitution
in a Senate of 50 members (currently 26 Republicans, 24
Democrats) and an Assembly of 203 members (103 Democrats, 100
Republicans). Senators serve four-year terms, with one-half the
membership up every two years. House members serve two-year
terms.
The lieutenant governor is the president and presiding officer of
the Senate. The Senate elects a president pro tem, and each
caucus elects from among its members various leadership
personnel. The House is presided over by the Speaker, who is
elected from and by the membership of that body for a two-year
term.
The Legislature will convene January 6, 1987, and will thereafter
meet sporadically to allow committee work on the budget process
and to allow for the House and Senate to prepare their respective
legislative agenda.
In 1987 Pennsylvania will have a new governor, Democrat Robert E.
Casey, and a new lieutenant governor, former state senator Mark
Singel.
While Democrats outnumber Republicans in the state by more than
700,000, the House majority has bounced back and forth between
the two parties, and the Senate has been in Republican hands for
nine years. Prior to 1987, the governorship had been in
Republican hands for eight years, and the two United States
Senators are Republicans, as is the state treasurer. The Office
of Auditor General, is currently held by Democrat Don Bailey.
RESOURCES: STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
Tobacco Segments -
The Tobacco Action Network (TAN) in Pennsylvania presently
contains 824 activists. These activists have been particularly
responsive to our 1986 needs and concerns with respect to H.B.
259 (smoking restrictions) and S.B. 948 (tax increase) through
letter-writing, phone bank operations and other lobbying efforts.
TAN will be a cornerstone for our 1987 grassroots efforts.
C
C

Pennsylvania, page 3
C
(
C
While 1986 saw only moderate response from our wholesaler,
retailer and vendor segments, a more intensified working
relationship engendered over the last year_should create a much
more useful and aggressive response from these groups in 1987.
Pennsylvania is fortunate to enjoy the presence of the cigar
manufacturing industry in the facilities of General Cigar,
Consolidated Cigar, American Cigar and Middleton Tobacco.
Additionally, U.S. Tobacco maintains a cigar manufacturing plant
in Red Lyon. These resources have been of valuable assistance in
defeating legislation at the state and local levels in the area
of public smoking.
.Business
The business community continues to be responsive on the issue of
public smoking restriction legislation. It has not expressed a
willingness to involve itself in other issues of interest to the
industry. However, it is pleasing to note that the Tavern
Association and the Restaurant Association officially came out
against the excise tax increase on cigarettes (S.B. 948) during
the 1986 session. One weakness that has been evident in
Pennsylvania relates to the non-activity by the business"
community on workplace restriction legislation. In fact, the
business community in several areas of the state, Lehigh/
Northampton/Easton Counties in particular, is in the forefront of
adopting, voluntarily, severe workplace smoking restrictions.
Labor
Labor coalitions have been visible in opposing Pennsyl- vania's
smoking restriction legislation at the state and local levels.
Through a long standing working relationship developed by
regional TI personnel, through the Institute's Labor/Management
Committee and various forms of networking, we expect to maintain
this level of cooperation and build further on this groundwork.
Fire Groups
Excellent relationships have been established with the fire
community. Through individual field contacts and in conjunction
with solid input from our Public Affairs Division, we now have
strong professional and personal credibility with the 1987
leadership of the Volunteer Firefighting Association (membership
over 300,000) and the Pennsylvania Fire Chiefs Association. Our
grassroots efforts have resulted in a favorable turnaround by
these two groups from initial support of "self-extinguishing"
legislation to official neutrality regarding such legislation.
1987 will result in a continued high level of activity with key
fire officials.

Pennsylvania, page 4
Institute Resources
Legal analyses, economic impact studies, and state and local
legislation services have been of great benefit.
We have successfully and effectively used the "Helping Youth
Decide" program and the "Voluntary Program for Smokers and
Nonsmokers" in Pennsylvania. The latter program has served to
engender a very close and legislatively profitable working
relationship with the restaurant community.
ANTI-TOBACCO FORCES
In 1986, state Rep. Michael Dawida's public smoking restriction
legislation (H.B. 259) was released from the House Health and
Welfare Committee to die in the Appropriations Committee. This
marks the eighth year that he has introduced this measure.
Through Pennsylvania's Interagency Council on Health, he has been
in communication with local hospitals, physicians groups and
county health departments. Another group, the Pennsylvania
Consensus Conference on Tobacco and Health Priorities, has set up
a state and local Action Plan which began in mid-1986 and will be
in full swing in 1987.
While we have. been fairly successful at the state level, this
success has resulted in increased anti-tobacco efforts at the
local level. 1986 saw local initiatives center on the issue of
tobacco and youth vis-a-vis vending machines. Local
organizations have gone to officials to request passage of
ordinances which would remove vending machines from areas where
minors might gain access to them.
Should these groups attain success in passing such ordinances,
they will then move in 1987-1988 to ban advertising of cigarettes
on billboards, ban vending machines and implement or pass
ordinances restricting or prohibiting smoking in the workplace.
There is little doubt that anti-tobacco forces will continue to
become more sophisticated in their approach to promoting
anti-tobacco legislation in Pennsylvania. 1987 will prove to be
a much more difficult legislative year as a result of the anti's
determination to promote anti-tobacco legislation and
regulations.
TOBACCO INDUSTRY
Brief History of Successes and Problems
In 1987, local legislation will continue to be a major problem.
It is expected that numerous localities will consider onerous
legislation. At the state capitol, however, it is expected that
no major legislative proposals will be adopted. We had
remarkable success in opposing excise tax legislation in 1985 and
1986, and we expect to continue this s-uccess through 1987.
C
C
Ex-

Pennsylvania, page 5
(
Major Issues -- State and Local
In 1986, public smoking and excise taxes were the two major state
level issues. It is expected that 1987 will show increased
efforts by anti-tobacco forces on these issues.
Outlook
In the final analysis, 1986 has proven to be a successful year.
However, 1987 promises to be a most difficult year.
In the process of continuing our major effort to address and
defeat tax and restriction legislation, we will also address and
respond to such issues as ingredients disclosure, sampling
prohibition, "self-extinguishing" cigarettes, product liability
and vending machine prohibition.
We expect our hardest-fought battles in 1987 to be at the local
level, and accordingly, we are gearing our efforts to that end.
December 1986
c

I
v
80420414,
w
I

C
RHODE ISLAND
PREFACE
Under overwhelming influence from Massachusetts and 'Connecticut,
Rhode Island is a state struggling to maintain its own social,
economic, and political independence and identity.
For many years, organized crime activities within Rhode Island
have provided a source for many ethnic jokes and court trials in
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. In recent years those
activities have resulted in a variety of scandals that have had
an impact on business and government in the state.
Like the rest of New England, Rhode Island is enjoying a high
degree of economic prosperity, resulting in considerable tax
surpluses and low unemployment. One problem is how to maintain
this prosperity.
There are approximately one million people in Rhode Island. It
has a 0.5 percent market share and a 25-cent per pack excise tax
on cigarettes. Those taxes are collected on approximately 128
million packs of cigarettes, producing state revenues of
approximately $30'million in fiscal year 1985.- This represents a
decline of two million packs while the state's revenues remained
stable since 1984.
STATE OVERVIEW
Economic Condition
As indicated, the state is enjoying a high level of economic
prosperity like that in the other New England States.
Unemployment is at an all-time low. The state tax surplus
allowed the legislature to enact another substantial tax rebate
in 1986. However, the double impact of federal tax reform and
budget reconciliation may result in a 1987 budget deficit.
The major concern on the economic front continues to be how to
attract new business to Rhode Island; The current business
community is made up largely of long-term, stable employers.
There has been little industrial development in the last ten
years. Part of this has to do with the past importance of the
labor community in the state and the lack of a serious
countervailing effort from the business community.

Rhode Island, page 2
The election of Republican Governor DiPrete in 1984 seemed to
signal a shift in that pro-labor stance. The 1985 legislative
session witnessed the repeal of-the "Striker Benefits Law," one
of only two such laws remaining in the country. That, combined
with the state's 1985 appropriation of $75,000 for
state-promotional ads in publications like the Wall Street
Journal, seems to indicate that the Governor is serious in his
attempt to show the business community that Rhode Island is
becoming pro-business. The 1986 elections may result in a
diminishing of that shift.
Political Situation
At present the political and legislative situation appears fairly
stable. The Democratic majority in the House and Senate was
continued by the voters. Governor DiPrete suffered no personal
setbacks at the polls; however, the voters rejected every other
statewide Republican candidate. DiPrete's standing alone at the
top is likely to result in some isolation and some serous "muscle
flexing" by the Democrats who would like to regain control of the
governor's chair. This could result in some extremes that could
harm tobacco interests.
A certain instability was observed last year when a large
surplus, a Democratic legislature, and a Republican chief
executive converged in a state with an overwhelmingly Democratic
voter registration. The result was a scramble for the
Republicans and their chief executive to appear more liberal than
they would normally. The Republicans had a tendency to actually
take up and champion those issues that were traditionally
Democratic.
For their part, the Democrats attempted to shift more to the
middle of the-road for the benefit of their coalition with
moderate Democrats, liberal Republicans, and the small business
community at large. In the middle of this, both parties
attempted to prove their fiscal responsibility and desire to give
back excess revenues to the people. In many ways those shifting
priorities provided the same type of legislative gridlock that
would have occurred if both of the parties had simply continued
to follow their traditional legislative objectives. While this
can prove helpful to tobacco interests, the 1986 reality was that
everyone sought a moderate stance on which to agree and for which
to take credit. Tobacco issues provided that no-lose compromise
for many legislators. The same or possibly more strident
legislative mix, when combined with the potential for budget
deficit in 1987, might prove more difficult for the tobacco
industry.
The most important political situation in 1986 was the
Constitutional Convention. This convention was the result of a
bipartisan commission chaired by TI's counsel, former Governor
Dennis Roberts.
(
(
e

(
(
c
Rhode Island, page 3
universal in the state.
It is interesting to note that the leadership of both parties
called upon Governor Roberts to orchestrate this most important
commission. This was done in an attempt to avoid the appearance
of any crass political agendas. Respect for Governor Roberts is
Those issues addressed by the Constitutional Convention were: (1)
four-year term for governor; (2) linkage of the governor's and
lieutenant governor's positions; (3) line-item veto; (4)
appointment versus election of the secretary of state and state
auditor; (5) legislative pay; (6) the size of the Rhode Island
Assembly; and (7) the method of electing Supreme Court Justices.
For the most part, the voters rejected all of the substantive,
controversial recommendations and supported the technical
corrections.
Other key political issues involved clearing out political
corruption in the government's housing and transportation
agencies. These will continue in 1987, and an investigation of
the office of defeated attorney general Arlene Violet will be
conducted by her successor at the request of the courts.
Significant State Problems
The major non-controversial problems for Rhode Island will be
those activities designed to stimulate economic growth. One of
the more controversial issues still of concern to Rhode Islanders
and all people in the Northeast in 1987 will be the solid waste
disposal problem. The state has effectively used up all of its
solid waste dump sites and must find alternative sites or
construct an ecologically sound incinerator.
Unlike 1986 and the situation in some of the other-New England
states in 1987, the problem of a budget deficit is a concern in
Rhode Island. For many politicians the problem of what to do
with last year's $50 - $100 million surplus will be replaced by
the opposite problem. Do you tinker with the tax structures?
Raise excise taxes? Overhaul the whole system? Cut programs?
Cut employees? How do you address the problem; and having
addressed it, who gets to take credit or blame for it?
While some of the 1985 legislative scandals were brought to a
close, new ones emerged -- specifically, the conclusion of action
at the Department of Transportation and the Rhode Island Housing
Mortgage and Finance Corporation indictments. A legislative
review of the legal activities in 1985 may produce a certain
amount of reform and restructuring in this quasi-public financing
organization.

Rhode Island, page 4
RESOURCES
Tobacco Segments
The Rhode Island tobacco family is weak. There are few
manufacturer sales representatives. The wholesaler community is
dominated by one major wholesaler, as is the vending industry.
Surprisingly, one of the most recently-organized groups, the New
England Convenience Store Association, is among the more
organized in the state and one of our best sources of legislative
support.
Like the rest of New England, the wholesalers who should provide
us with the backbone of our legislative support program spend
more time in internal conflict, posturing for the manufacturers,
and taking "pot shots" at the Tobacco Institute than in
legislative support. The 1985 split between the four top owners
and managers of CGI Corporation resulted in the creation of a new
and formidable wholesaling entity in the state. The bones of CGI
have since joined with Garber Brothers in Massachusetts. The
aborted creation of the New England Tobacco and Candy-Wholesalers
Association in November in 1985 resulted in even greater conflict
and animosity toward the Tobacco Institute in 1986. '
On numerous occasions, we have been able to organize the Rhode
Island tobacco community for very brief periods of legislative
activity. To date, a cohesive, coordinated, long-term effort has
not been possible. We can, if necessary, draw the family
together to oppose specific legislation, but we cannot keep them
together following the success or failure of our efforts.
Business
Traditionally, the business community in labor-dominated Rhode
Island has enjoyed second-class status. This is partially a
result of the overwhelming dominance of the labor movement in the
state and of disinterest on the part of the business community.
The individual members of that community are prosperous, and
prosperity tends to breed apathy. The realization that a
Republican governor could be elected has resulted in a resurgence
of conservative business activity in the state. Part of that has
come from a new-found strength and the positioning of an advocate
in the chief executive's office. Part of the growth is also a
result of the declining fortunes of the traditional labor
organizations in all of New England.
A specific example of the growing strength of business and the
waning fortunes of the labor movement came in 1985 with the
repeal of the "Strikers Benefit Law." Business had attempted
repeal on numerous occasions without a hint of success. In
1985, not only did labor/Democrats not oppose the repeal, but
they actually involved themselves in the process.
(
(

C
(
c
Rhode Island, page 5
As indicated above, the election and 1986 re-election of Governor
DiPrete, his efforts to attract new business to the state, and
the reduced influence of organized labor may indicate that
business' star is rising in Rhode Island. The voters' rejection
of Republican candidates at the polls, however, may result in a
decline in power for business.
Business support for tobacco is minimal. They view us as a
problem they don't need. In fact, the only way we could get the
business lobbyists to support us at the legislature was to keep
the issue off their board of'directors' formal agendas. They
would have supported a stronger law. ,
Labor
An analysis of labor is essentially a flip side of the analysis
of business. Organized labor suffers from the general prosperity
of the region and the decline in traditional blue-collar
employment. Labor also suffers from its members' primary concerns
away from labor's rights and prerogatives and increased benefits
to issues of on-the-job quality of the environment and other
traditional white-collar concerns. The net effect has been a
decline in their influence, as evidenced in the repeal of the
"Striker Benefits Law" over the substantial opposition of the
labor community. That opposition was so strong that it resulted
in the resignation of AFL-CIO President Ed McElroy from the
Democratic State Committee executive board. Unfortunately, it
appears that there was no discernible consternation among the
Democrats as a result of his leaving. The feeling of the party
is that labor will be back. It has nowhere else to go. The only
consistency between labor and business is on tobacco issues.
Again, we had to keep the executive committee of the state
AFL-CIO from voting on the workplace issue in order to gain their
lobbyist's support.
Fire Groups
We have developed a good, ongoing relationship with Providence
fire chief Michael Moise. That contact has been maintained, and
it is likely that the chief will give us good support on
legislative matters of mutual interest. On at least one
occasion, we have approached him with information on smoking in
the workplace, and he has been receptive.
ANTI-TOBACCO FORCES
The media may be our primary nemesis. The key anti-tobacco
advocate may be a local newspaper, the Providence Journal. The
almost-daily barrage of anti-tobacco news stories and--e-cTitorials
that appears in the Journal influences the perception of the
publi.c and the members ofthe legislature on the environmental
tobacco smoke issue. The Journal is the property of U.S. Senator
John Chafee's family. The senator's anti-tobacco sentiments are
shared by his family and are reflected in the newspaper.

Rhode Island, page 6
In a more traditional manner, the industry faces the Rhode Island
Coalition on Smoking OR Health, composed of a variety of
individual medical practitioners and associations, including the
heart association, lung association, cancer society, and the
State Department of Public Health. Interestingly enough, all of
these groups, including the Department, have full-time
legislative-counsels who work with the legislature on a daily
basis. These individuals and the Department continue to be our
primary source of difficulty at the legislative level. They are
not as well-organized as anti-tobacco groups in Connecticut,
Massachusetts,. and Maine. However, the addition of a number of
lobbyists, one of whom is also a state employee and ostensibly
working for the Administration, helps make up for their lack of
organization.
TOBACCO INDUSTRY
Brief History
Our legislative history in Rhode Island is somewhat checkered.
In 1986, six of thirty anti-tobacco measures passed. One (H
7017) was a resolution commending the work of the.Department of
Health for its anti-smoking efforts. The second (H 7479) was a
resolution extending a study commission, a request routinely
granted by the legislature. The third (H 8497) required tobacco
education in the schools and was not opposed by the industry. S
2271, restricting smoking in the Senate chambers, was part of the
year's rules package. H 7542 imposed a 1.6-cent tax increase but
repealed the earmarking passed during the 1985 session. Finally,
S 2643 required employers to have policies regarding smoking in '
the workplace. Included among the defeated bills was a tobacco
product liability measure. The state currently has a restaurant
restriction law and a law requiring the posting of signs at the
front door of restaurants. Clearly, while enjoying a great deal
of success at the legislative level, we are very vulnerable.
Increasing anti-tobacco activities, combined with the inability
of the tobacco family to work as a cohesive unit, suggests that
more difficult times may be ahead in Rhode Island.
Major Issues -- State and Local
At the state level, our primary challenge will be to defeat all
legislation resulting from the still-operating study commission.
In all likelihood, some expansion of the workplace restriction
will be considered. As a result of tax reform, we may see a move
to increase the cigarette excise tax. In the early part of the
session and again in the later stages, this is likely to become
one of our toughest issues.
C
C
e

(
Rhode Island, page 7
Outlook
In Rhode Island we are likely to suffer from the state's
proximity to larger and more liberal neighbors to the north and
west. The social pressures from Massachusetts and
Connecticut -- combined with the anti-tobacco media, the high
level of prosperity, the interest in a number of environmental
concerns, the desire of the Democrats to regain the governor's
seat with some old-time liberal posturing, and the activities of
the State Department of Public Health -- are likely to create a
volatile year for the tobacco industry. We are, therefore,
vulnerable on some sort of expansion of the workplace
legislation, youth-related issues like sampling and advertising,
and increases in the cigarette excise tax.
December 1986
C

I
~40
,.
I

C
SOUTH CAROLINA
c
PREFACE
South Carolina has a population of 3.1 million. The state relies
heavily on the manufacturing industry and, to a lesser degree,
agriculture and aquaculture. The state's employment in
manufacturing is close to 30 percent, second highest in the
United States. For this reason, the General Assembly is business
oriented with a conservative bent.
South Carolina's market share is 1.5 percent.
STATE OVERVIEW
Economic Condition and Outlook
If the unemployment rate is an indicator of a state's economic
health, then South Carolina is in fair shape with a 5.4 percent
rate -- a rate lower than 29 of the 50 states.
However, unemployment rates do not necessarily indicate fiscal
problems. Spending has risen faster than revenue increases
causing a$60 million shortfall for fiscal 1986-87. When other
economic indicators for South Carolina are taken into "
consideration, it appears that the state legislature should not
be under pressure to raise taxes in the near future. A new
Republican governor has pledged and repledged not to increase
taxes.
On November 5, the State Budget and Control Board proposed and
sent to the General Assembly a $3 billion budget for fiscal year
1986-87. This represents a $181 million increase over the
current budget. Part of this increase - $27 million - will go
toward pay increases for state employees. In addition, the
budget board endorsed an Education Improvement Act Budget of $243
million, up $17 million over 1985. This is to be funded by a
one-cent increase in the sales tax passed in 1986.
There should be little need to consider raising other taxes
during the 1987 legislative session. .
Political Situation
South Carolina voters elected their second Republican Governor
since Reconstruction, meanwhile, changes in top leadership in the
state House of Representatives for the next session are expected.
The South Carolina legislature is overwhelmingly Democratic with
only 22 Republicans out of 124 members in the House and 6 out of
46 members in the Senate.

South Carolina, page 2
Traditionally, Republicans come from the more populous areas of
the state such as Charleston, Columbia, Greenville and
Spartanburg. As a whole,.the legislature could be considered
conservative to moderate in political philosophy.
Significant State Problems
A major problem was addressed with the passage of the Education
Improvement Act of 1984 as South Carolina took a step forward in
improving its low-ranking public education program as well as its
future economic growth. A study by the Rand Corporation of the
educational plans of all states ranked South Carolina as the most
comprehensive.
South Carolina is a much poorer state than is commonly
recognized.. Residents are taxed at a high level compared to
their ability to pay. In terms of per capita personal income,
South Carolina is one of the poorest states in the country.
Most of the recent economic and industrial growth in the state
has been concentrated in 20 counties, leaving the remaining,
mostly rural, 26 counties in bad economic health.
Other issues to be addressed will be disposal of hazardous waste,
more effective law enforcement, the cost of state government,
repeal of the so-called "Blue Laws" which prohibit Sunday
operation of retail stores, and enabling legislation for the
consolidation of political subdivisions. . -
RESOURCES: STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
Tobacco Segments
A major tobacco-producing state, South Carolina has a strong
coalition of agriculture-related organizations which have
maintained an active role in opposing smoking restriction and tax
increase legislation.
The South Carolina Agricultural Commodity Commission for Tobacco,
headed by State Senator Tom Smith, and the South Carolina Farm
Bureau Federation have been our strongest allies in legislative
battles at the state, local and federal levels. They are a
source for strong grass roots involvement, with members in every
county in the state.
Another important source of legislative support comes from
Commissioner of Agriculture Les Tindal who has opposed cigarette
tax increase efforts and public smoking restriction legislation.
Other agricultural-related organizations which have played a role
in defending the industry are the South Carolina Tobacco
Warehouse Association, Pee Dee Tobacco Warehouse Association and
Women Involved in Farm Economics, (WIFE).
11
(
e

South Carolina, page 3
(
C
Member company sales representatives have assisted in legislative
contacts mainly in the more populous areas such as Columbia,
Charleston, Greenville and Spartanburg.
There is no wholesale distributor association in the state.
While the tobacco-producing area is geographically large, the
population, and as a result, the number of legislators
representing the area, is small compared to the remainder of the
state. In any event, the legislature can be looked upon as a
resource for strong tobacco allies. In the House, there are 25
members representing tobacco producing areas and in the Senate,
10 members.
Business
The South Carolina Restaurant Association has been the most
outspoken ally in opposing smoking restriction legislation
affecting restaurants. However, as soon as restaurants are
dropped from such legislation, the group disappears.
Other business-related associations which sometimes can be relied
on for assistance are the South Carolina Bankers Association and
the Chamber of Commerce.
In the past, the business community has taken a-backseat to farm
groups in opposing anti-tobacco legislation. Farmers tend to get
the "sympathy vote" because of the hard times they have
experienced in recent years.
Labor
Labor has very limited impact in South Carolina.
Fire Groups
These groups have very limited impact in South Carolina.
Institute Resources
T: I. economic impact studies on tobacco have been the major
issue-related resource requested and used by tobacco area
legislators in their efforts to debate anti-tobacco legislation.
The Farm Bureau and the Department of;Agriculture rely heavily on
T. I. for this type of support material as well.
Also playing an important part in our efforts are T. I. campaign
_contributions and financial support for agriculture-related
functions, such as the annual Salute to Agriculture and
Aquaculture attended by most legislators. '

South Carolina, page 4
ANTI-TOBACCO FORCES
Voluntary health groups including the South Carolina Lung
Association, South Carolina Heart Association and the American
Cancer Society are starting to take a more active role in efforts
to restrict smoking in public places.
As a result of their combined efforts, legislation was introduced
in both the House and Senate to restrict public smoking. In
addition, an ordinance patterned after the state bills has been
passed by the Richland County Council.
Another factor in the upsurge of this activity is the new South
Carolina Lung Association executive director, who came from the
West Virginia Lung Association and was actively involved there in
attempting to pass the West Virginia Clean Indoor Air Act.
Also supporting passage of anti-smoking bills: Blue-Cross and
Blue Shield, as well as two state agencies, the South Carolina
Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse and the Department of Health
and Environmental Control. The latter agency has- banned smoking
in all its offices across the state.
Representatives from each of the above-mentioned groups testified
in support of public smoking legislation at hearings held by a
Senate subcommittee and by the Richland County Council.
The danger from these groups is not their legislative influence,
which is lacking, but the publicity they have generated on the
public smoking issue.
TOBACCO INDUSTRY
Brief History of Successes and Problems
The last successful attempt to raise the cigarette tax was in
1977 when the legislature passed a one-cent increase to
seven-cents per pack. The extra penny was to fund agriculture
research in the state and was supported by former Commissioner of m
Agriculture Bryan Patrick. ~O
In recent years there have been several attempts in the House,
through amendments to appropriations bills, to raise the tax, but ,~
none has passed. lV
0~
C
C
A public smoking bill was reported by Senate Committee in 1986,
but died on the Senate contested calendar. This was one of
several restriction defeats since 1977.

C
South Carolina, page 5
Major Issues - State and Local
In 1987, cigarette tax increases will not be a major concern in
the legislature, but public smoking restriction bills will be.
With the passage of the Richland County public smoking ordinance,
we can expect similar activity in Charleston, Greenville,
Spartanburg and Columbia.
Outlook
With respect to state bills to restrict smoking or increase the
cigarette tax, the prognosis is excellent for the industry.
Local issues, however, could become a growing concern.
December 1986
(
C

80420428

SOUTH DAROTA
C
PREFACE
Quite possibly the most solvent state government in mid-America,
South Dakota, has emerged relatively unscathed during the past
recession.
South Dakota, the home of the Sioux Indian nation, is more
western than mid-western. With legends such as "Wild Bill
Hickock" and the exploits of General George Armstrong Custer,
South Dakota's origins harken back to the,days of the "Wild
West." Many of the original settlers came from the westward
treks of Minnesota, Wisconsin and Illinois settlers. South
Dakota's population is relatively unchanged since the turn of the
century.
South Dakota has become extraordinarily Republican and
interestingly atypical to its neighbors to the north and east.
South Dakota never had much use for the Farm and Labor Party of
Minnesota nor did it ever accept the socialism exhibited in North
Dakota. Although strongly Republican, South Dakota has elected
some of the most liberal officials in the country, not the least
of whom was Senator George McGovern.
South Dakota has a population of 680,000 people and a market
share of less than three-tenths of one percent. Its Governor,
George Mickelson, is Republican and both legislative houses are
overwhelmingly Republican. For the past several years, outgoing
Governor Janklow emphasized a program of attracting business to
the state of South Dakota by means of public sector "incentives."
Incentives such as no state income tax, property tax amnesties
and statutory changes giving business enterprises added incentive
to come to South Dakota are all hallmarks of his administration.
Janklow could not run again for reelection in 1986 due to
constitutional prohibition.
South Dakota is a state of many inconsistencies. It has a
legislature controlled by Republicans, a Republican governor and
extremely conservative fiscal policies, but it is the same state
that continually reelects liberal Tom Daschle, former
Congressman, now newly elected U. S. Senator.
STATE OVERVIEW
Economic Conditions and Outlook
South Dakota's economy is not typical of its neighbor states.
South Dakota realized its dilemma several years ago: an image of
a "do nothing" state that was "50th in everything."

South Dakota, page 2
With the emergence of Governor Bill Janklow, many of these
problems were brought to the forefront. A relatively famous flap
ensued between Janklow and the equally excitable Minnesota
Governor Rudy Perpich when Janklow, attempting to lure business
to South Dakota, began a concerted effort to romance Minnesota
businesses to his state. Governor Perpich, although initially
amused, became irritated to the point of calling South Dakota
"our nation's 50th state...50th in education, 50th in industry,
50th in farming, etc." Janklow, spotting an opening for
publicity, went out to prove that South Dakota was not only a
good place to live, but a good place for business to flourish.
Janklow immediately embarked on a program of economic development
using public sector "pump priming" as the catalyst for change.
Tax considerations were dangled before multinational
corporations, South Dakota's lack of a state income tax was
highlighted and Janklow's effusive demeanor and behavior pleased
big business executives who were flattered that a state governor
would show up at their doorsteps asking for business. Janklow's
gamble paid off and big business did come to South Dakota.
CitiCorp, the major new industry, was successful in leading the
way for dozens of other smaller industries to South Dakota.
South Dakota's unemployment rate ranks among the lowest in the
country with major city Sioux Falls boasting of "full
employment."
The outlook at this time continues to be rosy and the businesses
just keep on coming. South Dakota's absence of a state income
tax is enough to attract those executives in the $100,000 to
$200,000 a year salary range._ Its "liberal" interpretations of
state banking statutes make it a haven for interstate banking and
venture capital groups. Its overall focus can be termed
"information age" rather than "industrial age."
Political Situation: Current and Outlook
The race for Governor, although considered initially to be a
Republican runaway, was relatively close. Republican candidate
George Mickelson garnered 52 per cent of the vote to Democratic
challenger House Minority Leader Lars Herseth. It is important
to note that both Mickelson's and Herseth's fathers were South
Dakota governors in years past.
With regard to the House of Representatives, the Republicans
enjoy a 48-21 vote margin.
In the Senate, the Republicans enjoy a lop-sided 24-11 majority.
It is interesting to note some of the changes in the 1987 South
Dakota legislature: anti-tobacco activists Senators Gary Hanson
and Randy Austad, son of the state's most vocal anti-tobacco
spokesman, were both victorious.
(
c
(23

South Dakota, page 3
(
To make matters worse, several "friends of the tobacco industry"
were defeated in their bids for reelection. Senator Don
Peterson, Chairman of the Taxation Committee, Senator Tom
Krueger, Representative George Dunn, and Representative Dean E.
Wieczorek were all defeated.
As the legislature is overwhelmingly Republican, the new Governor
George Mickelson will enjoy an essentially veto-proof
legislature.
In the U. S. Senate and House races, Congressman Tom Daschle
(D-SD) upset incumbent Senator James Abdnor (R-SD) by a margin of
52-48 per cent. The race for the U. S. House seat was won by
Democrat Tim Johnson by a margin of 62-38 per cent.
Significant State Problems
The most glaring problem facing the state of South Dakota is the
quality of its public education system. That system, considered
by most to be one of the worst in the country, has come under
fire from education leaders and legislators.
The second most significant problem facing South Dakota is the
constant wrangling over nuclear waste dumps in that state. This
has been a major issue during the past two legislative sessions
and will continue to be an issue during 1987. .
RESOURCES: STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
Tobacco Segments
There is no tobacco farming in the state, therefore, the tobacco
industry is represented through the wholesaler and retailer
segments.
Wholesaler support during the past several years has been
erratic. As in other states, when threatened with a lowering of
the discount rate or a total abolition of the minimum mark-up
law, the South Dakota wholesalers became parochial in their view
of the tobacco industry. Their inability to work closely with
tobacco industry operatives forced the industry to temporarily
withdraw financial contributions to that state's association.
There have been new and recent overtures for a rectification of
this situation.
Business
The South Dakota business community is unique. The low
population in that state means that chambers of commerce and
business associations tend to be loose confederations emanating
primarily from Sioux Falls, Pierre and Rapid City.

South Dakota, page 4
The industry's business contacts have been good and it is hoped
that they will continue during the 1987 legislative session.
Labor
Labor is a minimal force in South Dakota politics.
Institute Resources
The Tobacco Institute will continue its legislative efforts in
South Dakota by securing the best possible lobbyists to represent
our interests.
ANTI-TOBACCO FORCES
Although defeated for the past four legislative sessions, a Clean
Indoor Air Act will again be introduced during the 1987
legislative session.
The anti-tobacco movement in South Dakota is considerably more
subdued than in surrounding states. It is no secret that
Governor Janklow was no friend of tobacco. It is unclear as to
the disposition of newly-elected Governor Mickelson.
TOBACCO INDUSTRY
Success and Problems - History
With the passage of an 8-cent cigarette tax increase during the
1985 session, the tobacco industry took some lumps. However, in
consideration of the better-than-average economic situation in
that state, a tax increase proposal would be less difficult to
deal with in 1987.
On the other hand, a problem does exist with the tobacco segments
of our industry in South Dakota. Efforts will be undertaken to
reopen lines of communication with the South Dakota wholesalers
in our grassroots program for 1987.
Major Issues - State and Local
The following issues will confront the industry in South Dakota
during 1987:
Smoking Restrictions. Efforts to pass a restriction bill will be
intensified during 1987.
Tax Increase. Unlikely, although always a possibility.

C
South Dakota, page 5
Outlook
It is our expectation that the major issue on the horizon will be
a statewide workplace smoking bill. During the 1985 legislative
session, the industry barely survived a Senate vote on this
issue. It is quite possible that there could be serious problems
regarding workplace smoking during 1987.
December 1986

I

Tennessee, is essentially three geographical and political
states: East Tennessee, Middle Tennessee and West Tennessee. The
East is feisty and Republican, Middle Tennessee is Democratic to
the extreme. West Tennessee has a mixture of Democratic and
Republican politics. These factors are most important when
viewing a statewide race.
(
The state's market share is 2.2 percent.
STATE OVERVIEW
Economic Condition and Outlook
Tennessee will finish the fiscal year with approximately a $22
million shortfall. This will be taken from the rainy day fund.
Currently revenues are up 25 percent, but that is not expected to
hold. To meet fiscal needs, Tennessee must maintain a
six-percent growth. The highway fund is in need of attention,
and the legislature is expected to tap the gasoline and diesel
fuel tax.
Presently, Tennessee has no personal income tax. This issue will
come up again either in 1987 or 1988.
Political Situation
The 1986 legislative elections had less impact on the General
Assembly than did the gubernatorial election. The 1986
legislative session began with 23 Democrats and 10 Republicans in
the Senate and 61 Democrats and 38 Republicans in the House. The
numbers will remain the same in 1987. Four incumbents were
defeated in the August primary and two incumbents were defeated
in November.
The 95th General Assembly will have 18 freshman legislators, 14
in the House, four in the Senate. One of the freshman senators,
Senator Randy McNally (R-0ak Ridge), served in the House during
the 94th General Assembly.
The gubernatorial election was important to the House for one
major reason: the loss of Ned McWherter as House Speaker and the
( corresponding gain of McWherter as governor.

Tennessee
In some cases, this may change the dynamics of lobbying on
business legislation. Governor Alexander, by endorsing or
opposing a bill, directly affected the vote of a vast majority of
the 38 Republican legislators. Those 38 votes are now much more
difficult to orchestrate. Possibly of more importance to
business is the ability of the new Democratic governor to help or
hurt business legislation. Although Alexander could command 38
Republican votes, Mcwherter can command 61 Democratic votes.
House Democrats have elected new House leadership.
Representative Ed Murray (D-Winchester) was elected Speaker.
Murray is an attorney and the former chairman of the House
Commerce Committee. He is a close ally of McWherter's and is
expected to maintain a close relationship with the new
administration. He is a moderately pro-business legislator.
Representative Lois DeBerry (D-Memphis) was elected Speaker
Pro-Tem. Ms. DeBerry defeated former Speaker Pro-Tem Steve Bivens
(D-Cleveland).
Speaker-elect Murray will announce his selections for committee
officers and membership after the House meets to organize on
January 13, 1987. He has been quoted in the media as saying "I
don't anticipate any dramatic changes" in committee composition
or leadership.
There is considerable speculation, however, that Murray may not
_reappoint House General Welfare Chairman Paul Starnes
(D-Chattanooga) or House Finance Chairman John Bragg
(D-Murfreesboro). Starnes and Bragg both announced early for
Speaker but withdrew from the race before the caucus meeting.
The state Senate is currently the scene of the most bitter
leadership race in anyone's memory. Lt. Governor John Wilder
(D-Somerville) is being challenged for re-election by Senator
Riley Darnell (D-Clarksville). Wilder, who has served as Lt.
Governor since 1970, longer than anyone in Tennessee history, has
lost the support of a majority of the Democratic caucus.
Regardless of the final outcome in this battle, the state Senate
will be, badly divided and bitter feelings will remain.
Significant State Problems
During the 1986 session, the legislature continued to work on
problems of prison reform. Another area of concern for state
officials in 1987 will be the funding the career ladder for
teachers.
Another major problem will be health care cost containment.
Medicare/Medicaid are facing financial problems. The state may
have to address cutbacks in federal funding of various programs,
as well as revenue sharing for cities.
C

Tennessee, page 3
<
RESOURCES: STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
Tobacco Segments
Tobacco remains a very important cash crop for Tennessee. Over
the years we have had the support of various wholesalers and the
farm bureau.
Business
We are fortunate to have a strong relationship with:
Tennessee Restaurant Association
Tennessee Wholesale Grocers' Association
Tennessee Retail Grocers' Association
Tennessee Press Association
Texas Gas and Pipeline
These organizations have either directly or indirectly assisted
with our efforts to control taxes and restrictions in Tennessee.
Labor
We received no apparent support from labor organizations in
recent tax battles. We have not developed a rapport with unions
in Tennessee, as we have always been closely aligned with
agriculture.
Fire Groups
Although we have assisted several fire groups in Tennessee, we
have not asked them to come to our aid on local issues except in
Memphis, where they gave.token assistance.
ANTI-TOBACCO FORCES
We may see another attempt to introduce anti-tobacco legislation.
There is growing anti-tobacco sentiment in the media and at the
university locations such as Knoxville, Chattanooga, and at
Vanderbilt in Nashville.
TOBACCO INDUSTRY
Brief History of Successes and Problems
During a special session in December 1985, the tobacco industry
came together and defeated a cigarette tax proposed by Governor
Alexander. During the regular session in 1986, we defeated in
committee a bill to ban smoking in hospitals.

Tennessee, page 4
In January 1986, smoking restrictions were imposed in restaurants
in Memphis. The restaurant association did not hold up their end
of the argument against restrictions.
The Davidson County Commissioners passed a resolution requesting
action by their delegation and the state legislature for a
cigarette tax. This tax would finance fire and police pay
increases. It is not likely to get much attention during the
1987 legislative session.
Outlook -
We do not anticipate a serious threat to cigarette taxes during
the 1987 session. We do, however, expect another effort to be
made by anti-tobacco forces to ban or restrict the use of
cigarettes and other tobacco products. The strength and unity of
our allies in Tennessee suggests we will not have much trouble
defeating such legislation.
C
December 1986
~

I
FF
v
4
80420439

C
TEXAS
(
C
PREFACE
Texas is the third most populous state in the nation. Population
projections through 1990 predict that, at that time, Texas will
follow only California in population. One result of this growth
is the expected addition of up to four new Congressional seats in
Texas, bringing the total to 31. These additional seats would
give Texas the second largest delegation in Congress.
This tremendous population growth is reflected in the growth of
major cities. Houston is presently the 4th largest city in the
nation, Dallas is 6th and San Antonio is 10th. Texas has a
market share of 6.6 percent. _
A large number of these new citizens arrived in Texas from the
Northeast and Midwest. Many new arrivals come from states which
provide a wide range of services for their citizens.
Historically, Texas has provided few such state services. The
result: the state is now spending in new areas for its
citizenry.
The expectations of these new arrivals, along with their great
numbers, have caused the state to appropriate funds at an ever-
increasing rate.
STATE OVERVIEW
Economic Condition And Outlook
The economy of Texas continues to stagger. Historically, Texas
depended solely on the revenues from the oil and gas industry and
related fields to finance state government. Since 1980, however,
the oil and gas industry has been stagnant.
The state comptroller estimates that 40 percent of the state
sales tax receipts are directly related to the oil and gas
business. The recent slump in this industry has been financially
devastating to the State of Texas.
As a result of the two special legislative sessions in 1986, the
deficit for the 1986-87 biennium was cut from approximately $3.5
billion to approximately $1 billion. The state comptroller
projects that a 1988-89 budget funded at the 1986-87 level would
produce a $5-7 billion deficit unless there is a dramatic upswing
in the price of oil, which is unlikely.
Unemployment figures for the state continue to hover around nine
percent with certain areas such as Houston and the Rio Grande
Valley in double figures.

Texas, page 2
Political Situation
The November 4th elections brought ex-Governor Bill Clements (a
Republican) back into the Governor's mansion. The incumbent,
Governor White (a Democrat), was blamed for the continuing poor
economic climate as well as the enactment of tax increases in
1984 and 1986.
The recent elections showed no other changes in statewide offices
or the Legislature. The Speaker, Lt. Governor and all major
Legislature leaders were re-elected. The Democrats continue to
dominate both the House and Senate. The Republicans picked up
one seat in the House to increase their total to 56 of 150. The
Senate split continues at 6 Republicans and 25 Democrats.
It must be remembered that neither the House nor Senate operates
on a majority/minority party basis. Republicans hold committee
chairs in both the House and Senate even though both the Speaker
and Lt. Governor are Democrats.
Governor-elect Clements has appointed as his chief of staff
Hilary Doran, an R.J.R. lobbyist.
Significant State Problems
Money will be the primary concern of the Legislature when it
convenes in January of 1987.
Governor-elect Clements ran on a platform of no new taxes.
However, on the day after the election, he stated that the
Legislature may have to look at new sources of revenue.
The 1986 special session raised the sales tax by 1-1/8 percent.
The tax increase is to sunset on August 31, 1987. There has been
speculation, however, that the sales tax will be made permanent.
Talk has also centered on broadening the sales tax to include
presently exempted items, such as attorney and doctor fees,
architect fees, advertising, etc. Every presently exempt item
will be considered except food and medicine.
In addition, we can expect the Legislature to consider increasing
cigarette and OTP taxes.
RESOURCES: STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
Tobacco Segments
Statewide smoking restriction legislation introduced in 1985
necessitated a broadening of our traditional ally network.
The Texas Association of Tobacco & Candy Distributors (TATCD)
continues to provide great support on both the local and state
level"s. TATCD will remain a strong ally.
(
(
C

Texas, page 3
(
Member company employees will remain very active. Certain member
company PACs in Texas should also help our cause.
The Texas Merchandise Vendors Association is a small, mostly
full-line vendor group has never been very helpful on the state
level. We do receive help from several cigarette vendors, many
of whom are not TMVA members.
There is no statewide retailers organization in the state, and as
a result, their help is often hard to mobilize. Retailers have
proven to be of more help on local issues.
Business
The following groups have proven reliable allies when facing
local or statewide smoking restrictions:
A. Texas Restaurant Association
B. Texas Association of Business
C. Texas Bowling Proprietors Association
D. Texas Retail Grocers Association
E. Southwest Bell
F.' Texas Hotel/Motel Association
(
C
During the past year the Texas Cancer Council, a legislatively
funded coalition of our traditional opponents, has met with all
of our allies in an attempt to address their concerns with regard
to smoking restriction legislation.
It is extremely doubtful that we will be able to count on any
help from the above mentioned groups with excise taxes. All of
these groups will face tax increases in their business.
Labor
Personal relationships with organized labor are very solid, but
we have not had an occasion to call upon them for legislative
assistance.
While labor should be opposed to excise taxes, they and their
supporters in the legislature have been among the biggest
proponents of projects which tobacco taxes were earmarked to
fund, i.e., additional funding for education during the 1984
special session and indigent health care in the 1985 regular
session.
Fire Groups
TI has not given support to any fire departments in Texas. Also,
we have never faced any serious problems with
"self-extinguishing" legislation.

Texas, page 4
ANTI-TOBACCO FORCES
The 1985 Legislature created and funded the Texas Cancer Council.
As previously mentioned, the Council has been working diligently
to co-opt our traditional allies.
The Council's legislative program calls for the passage of a
Clean Indoor Air Act (including the workplace) and a doubling of
the cigarette tax to 41 cents per pack.
In 1986, every major city in Texas enacted some form of smoking
restriction ordinance. Unless a statewide smoking restriction
bill is enacted by the next Legislature, we will, in all
probability, continue to see many of the mid-sized cities (i.e.,
Lubbock, Amarillo, Texarkana, etc.), as well as suburban cities,
propose ordinances.
TOBACCO INDUSTRY
History of Successes and Problems
In 1975, the Texas Legislature passed legislation restricting
smoking in elevators, buses, theaters, museums, etc. We defeated
attempts to broaden that legislation in 1981 and 1985.
We expect another effort to regulate smoking in public places in
1987. Members of the Legislature have not viewed smoking as a
major problem. Those states which have passed restrictive
legislation are perceived here as liberal/progressive states.
That perception has helped kill such legislation.
However, that view may be changing. With "middle America" and
additional conservative states beginning to enact such
legislation, it is becoming more acceptable. Also, as more local
areas of Texas enact ordinances, the legislators from those
cities will be less prone to view such ideas as "wide-eyed."
Prior to 1984, Texas had not had an increase in its cigarette
excise tax since 1971. Because of fiscal problems, we can expect
excise tax problems in the next legislative session.
We do not look for any "self-extinguishing" or sampling issues in
1987. We do look for continued local activity in the major
cities of Texas, especially the Dallas/Fort Worth area.
December, 1986

80420444
/

C
UTAH
(
PREFACE
Utah is one of the bastions of western conservatism. The Mormon
Church continues to dominate economically, socially, and
politically. The Mormon tenets of clean living, hard work and
big families are visible throughout state society. Curiously,
only about half the population of this state is thought to be of
Mormon religious persuasion. The Utah Mormon influence is
evident in surrounding states of Nevada and Arizona and perhaps
most strongly in Idaho.
Utah, with the nation's lowest per capita cigarette consumption,
has a four-tenths of one percent share of market. Agriculture and mining are no longer the
predominant industries
in Utah. Transportation, a rapidly growing industrial base and
wholesale and retail trade now rank above agriculture and mining
in employment and contribution to economy. Over 20 percent of
Utah's working population is employed by government.
STATE OVERVIEW
Economic Condition and Outlook
Employment continues strong in Utah as it has for the past few
years. Unemployment in late 1984 stood at 5.6 percent compared
to the 7.1 percent national average. It is projected that Utah's
population will grow from today's 1.7 million to 2.7 million by
2010. Most of this growth will come from natural population
growth for the next ten years. This signals an expectation of
continued-prosperity for the citizens of Utah.
The Utah economy in 1986, however, failed in many respects to
live up to projections, leaving the state budget substantially
short in the current fiscal year. This seems only to reflect
overly optimistic views held by the state's fiscal officers.
Political Situation
While Utah remains a predominantly Republican state, Democrats
made significant inroads during the 1986 elections. A new
Democratic Congressman joins the previously all Republican
Congressional delegation.
In the state Senate, still safely Republican, two new Democratic
senators were elected making the ratio 8 Democrats to 21
Republican.

Utah, page 2
Similarly, the House of Representatives remains in the Republican
column, but 13 new Democratic representatives were elected
bringing the count to 27 Democrats versus 48 Republicans.
It is difficult to project what this will mean in terms of 1987
legislation, since party designation in this state really does
not mean much in terms of philosophical orientation to issues.
Significant State Problems
Money, how to raise it and how to spend it, will be the major
issue in 1987. Governor Bangerter's election promise of "no new
taxes for two years" expires in 1987. Facing certain revenue
shortfalls, he can be expected to make up for lost time.
Cigarette, other tobacco products and other sumptuary taxes will
be very vulnerable.
Education and how to finance it will continue to be a major
problem in this state. In 1995 there are projected to be 57
percent more school-age children in the state than in 1980.
Environmental concerns, including the proposed location of toxic
waste dump sites in central and southern Utah, will be an issue
in the coming Legislature.
Action on the AMA anti-smoking guideline proposals must be
considered likely.
RESOURCES: STRENGTHS/WEAKNESSES
Tobacco Segments
The tobacco family is very limited in Utah. Tobacco wholesalers
are few in number but have been very supportive, even though no
formal organization of wholesalers exists. Member company
personnel have consistently shown interest and a willingness to
do what they can.
Business
As would be expected in a Mormon state, general business
organizations, chambers of commerce, etc., are not inclined to
take positions in defense of tobacco. We are developing direct
relationships with the Utah Taxpayers Association, Restaurant
Association and Retailers Association. Such groups can be useful
when they can find a general business position to take to help
defend us.
Labor
Utah is one of 19 "Right to Work" states where no employee can be
forced to join a union in order to be employed. As a result,
labor is not very organized nor considered a significant factor
in the state.
C
.
C
