Lorillard
The Health Consequences of Smoking Cancer and Chronic Lung Disease in the Workplace
Fields
- Type
- PSCI, SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION
- BIBL, BIBLIOGRAPHY
- CHAR, CHART/GRAPH/MAPS
- Site
- G65
- Master ID
- 80409601/0133
Related Documents:
Document Images
CHAPTER 10
COTTON DUST EXPOSURE
AND CIGARETTE SMOKING

Introduction
6
Influence of Cigarette Smoking on the Natural History of1
Bvssinosis.
Cigarette Smoking Patterns Among. Workers Exposed
to Cotton Dust
Acute Effects of Smoking and Cotton Dust Exposure
on Respiratory Symptoms
Effects of Smoking and Cotton Dust Exposure on
Pulmonary Function Tests
Chronic Clinical Effects of Cotton Dust Exposure
Mechanisms of Cotton Dust Lung Injury
Inflammation (Bronchitis)
Airways Constriction
Chronic.Inflamrnatory Lung Destruction
Cotton Dust Exposure and Mortality From~ Respiratory
Disease and Lung.Cancer
Control of Cotton Dust Exposure
Summary and Conclusions

Yam pmGUCUon
Slashing/Wesving
Pl6p9rfiGGp
Mistguaneows
FIGURE: 1.-Byssinosis prevalence by work area and raw
material use
NOTE Avevage prevelPoce mttan. 6.2 percent; ceUonlsyntheiq 4 4 pprcent.
5OUECE:Imtlus enE Suh (1973).
relationship to cigarette smoking is discussed in greater detail later
in this chapter.
Influence of Cigarette Smoking on the Natural History of
Byssinosis
Cigarette Smoking Patterns Among Workers Exposed to
Cotton Dust
The smoking patterns of cotton dust exposed workers have been
reported by a number of authors and are presented in Table 1.
In summary, current studies show that male cotton workers tend
to smoke to a greater degree than do female cotton workers. Male
textile workers in Western Europe and in Canada smoke with
404

tA
TABLE 1.-Continued
Study Number and type
of populatiou
Smoking cheracterieti® (percent)
Cummenfe
Imbue and Suh 10,133 ontton worke
re, Men 78 Smokers include
(1973) _
North Carolina - Women 43 ever smoked
I cig/day for 1
Y.
Berry et al. 14 cotton and 2 maamade Men 75.6 Former emokere
(1974) fiber mills, Grest Britain Wamen 56.5 not reported
Zuekin et n1. Wool workers and controls Workere Men 47
(1976) Women 0
Controle Men 65
Women 0
Khogali 271 ginnery workers, Sudan SM Alrnuet 1/2
(1976) 36.5 emokem enid
smoked <6
cige/day
Jones et al.
(1977)
153 cottonmfll workers,
southeast United States
Card and weave room
warkere, South Carolina
E000Tti0e
Men
Women
SM/ER
70
SM
18-61
15-3.6

TABLE 1.-Prevalence of smoking in studies of cotton workers
Study Number and type
of population
Smoking characteristics (percent)
Schreg and GuBett
(1970) 509 cotton textile workers SM
38 EX/NS
Kari-Koekinen and 987 female cotton workers, 16.9 83.1
Hirvonen (1970) Finlaud Age
17-29
39.8
30-39 141
40-09 9.0
60-46(1 5,0
Merchsnt, 7tiburq
et al. (1972) 436 cottonaynthetic blend
workere, North Carolina SM
64,7 SX
12.0 NS
33.3
Kilburn, Rflburn 1,046 female textile SM
et el. (1973) worken, North Carolina Sym wool wwkere 45.2
- Cottnnmill worken 35.8
Srymczykiewia et 637 men, 2,690 women Men 80.5
M. (1970) Women 8.9
Pox at al, Cotton wnrkets, 35 mills, SM NS EX
(1973) Great Britain 62 31,6 6.3
(7p/day
1-14
38.2
15-24 21
>24 2.8
zoootVoa
Commentn
Percent emuking
<1 pack/day not
arailsble
>639a began
emaking at 15-19
years of age

TABLE 1.--Continued
Study
Number and type
of population
Smoking characteristics (percent) Commenta
Barm®n 70 cottonmill wurkere SM EX
(1979) Men 44 28
Women 58
Sperke and Peters Ccttan duztezpooed worken Men 44 28
(1980) Women 56 -
Grimard and Adams Tertile worke., Cznede Men 76.8
(1981) Women 60.4
Beck et al.
(1982) 118 male and 162 female
cotton t<rt8e workerz Men
Worken
27
Controls 16
Wumen
Workers
31
Controls 43
NO'Ck: SM=Smokeq EX=Ps.moker; NS=Nunemoker.

i
Ptlmer et al. 203 gin workere SM EX NS
(1978) Ginnees 51.1 25.5 23.4
(16.0)' (9.6)
Pree®nen 57.1 19.1 23.8
(7.3) (4.1)
Othere 456 15.1 39.4
(15.3) (8.01
Controle 52.3 192 28.5
(11.4) (9.1)
Bouhuye et al.
(1979) Textile wnrkere, aged Z45,
South Cerolina Women
Carding SM
18 EX
14 NS
68
Spinning 20 10 70
Prepering 17 14 69
Weaving 20 10 69
Othes' 15 11 74
Men
C¢rding
26
M
26
Spinning 37 45 18
Preparing 50 42 g
Weaving 38 37 18
Othem' 20 35 30
donee et sl.
(1979) Cutton and wool/aynthetie
mill wockere
Mill 1 SM'
52.8 NS
47.2
Idil12 66.9 33.1
Mil13 64.8 35.2
),fill4 38.0 62,0
~
I ~
f'000IV0B
'( )=mepv
peck-ycere
(1 pk/dey/yeei)
'Includes cloth
room workets and
miecelleneous job
rategoriee
'Smokem include
esamoke~

Introduction
Exposures to cotton, hemp, and flax dust have been associated
with two acute pulmonary responses: irritant (industJrial)~bronchitis
and chest tightness (byssinosis). These symptoms, often, accompanied
by reduction in lting function, have occurred in 2 to 30 percent of
cotton textile workers within hours of resuming exposure following a
weekend or holiday (Schilling 1956; Morgan et al. 1982). These
elements of the acute cotton dust.pulmonary response may not occur
together, and mayrepresentsesponses of distinct pulmonary mecha-
nisms. The exposure variables or host characteristics that lead to
cough rather than to bronchoconstrictiom are currently under
careful study (Hogg and Eggleston 1984). The effects of cigarette
smoking upon these different responses is also incompletely under-
stood.
In the manufacture. of cotton textiles, cotton dust exposure occurs
most intensely when the tightly packed: bale is opened and when
abrasive crushing and carding removethe "trash" (plant bracts and
other parts, dirt, bacteria, and fungi) and align the fibers for
spinning (IGideom and' Johnson 1978). Normally, as the cotton fibers
are spun, twisted, and woven into cloth, progressively less dust is
generated. By the time cotton cloth is processed, the procedure is
practically free of cotton dust (Kilburn 1983).
Cross-secfional studies have shown that byssinosis prevalence is
greatest among cotton textile workers in the dusty preparation jobs
(e.g., carder, stripper, or grinder) (Figure 1). Byssinosis prevalence
has been related to the.duration of cotton dust exposure, to the
quality of the raw cotton, and to the levels of lint-free cotton dust
(Molyneux and Tombleson 1970;. Merchant,. Lumsden~ Kilburn,
0'Fallon et al. 1973b; Kamat et a1. 1981). At a cotton dust level of 0.2
mg/m' (lint-free dust of approximately 15 µm or less), approximately
15 percent of the cotton textile workers have some grade of
byssinosis (Merchant, Lumsden, Kilburn~ O'Fallon et a1L 1973b).
While a smalli sex-specific effect (male disadvantage) has been noted
(Berry et al. 1974), no age effect has been shown after adjustment for
exposure (Merchant, Lumsden, Kilburn, O'Fallon et al. 1973b; Berry
et al. 1974). Cigarette smoke interacts with cotton dust exposure in
cotton textile workers and has been associated with increased
byssinosis prevalence.and severity (Berry et al. 1974). The frequency
of byssinosis has been eloselycorrelated with the presence of chronic
bronchitis, and both symptoms have been associated'with ventilatory
impairment (Imbus and Suh 1973): Cross-sectional studies have
correlated cotton dust exposure with two components of ventilatory
impairment: reduction in the baseline level of forced expiration and
reversible loss of function across a work shift. The relationship of
byssinosiss and bronchitiss with ventilatory impairmentt and its
403

TABLE 2.-Prevalence. (percent) of byssinosis in nine
exposure groups
Exposure.
(yr)
Number
in group
Observedl
prevalence
Prevalence
adjusted
for age Prevalence
adjusted for
age, miil'type,
and sex
U-4 305 5.2' 8.8 8.0'.
5-9
10-14 155
168 23.3
29.01 20.5
22.3 19.2
21.0
1 fr 19 187. 368 '. 29.5 - 27:5
26-24. 117. 36.8'. 30.9 31.1
2529 115 43.5 40.2 42.4
30-34 94 30.R 30.2 35.1
35-39. 99 35.4 36.5 414
>40 119 336'. 37.7 418
SOI.'RCE: Nolmevx and Tcmbleson f1970).
TABLE 3.-Age-adjusted association of bronchitis and
smoking, by byssinosis status and sex
Brnnchitis Brnnchitis Chi square end!
with byssinosis withuut Hyssino.sl.s odtls ratio for
the associatfon of
$maker N' Present Absent. . N Present Absent smoking/brnnchitls'
Yea
No
Yea
No
Chi 6quare':.
Odds.RBtio''
Chi Bqunre'r.
Odds RStio'!
'
Men
127 55%. 45% 301 46% 54% %°=15.20
33 55% 45% 105 21% 79% OR=2.28
(p <0 0©01)
Women
125 48%. 52% 322 31% 69% X'=21.10
78 33% 67% 268 16% 84% OR=216
(p<0-oW11
X'=2:83 X'=36.8
0R=149 0R=263
(p=0.09) (p<0.0001)
X'=36:3
OR=2.21
(p<0.OW1)
' WeiBhtM by Mantel-Ilaenszel techni4Ve for hysnnmsu freqVenq.
' Weighted by M1fantel-HaPns..rl tArhniqVe fnr cex distrihutinn.
' W.yhted by M1fxn~el-Hxenvr] (achniyye fur fleyuenuy uf Luth by-nueu snd sex.
BOURCEMalyneux snd Tomblesun (1970))
smokers' than among nonsmokers or exsmokers of bothh sexes;
however, these differences were not st'atisticalily significant (Berry et
al. 1974).
411
11

greater frequency than do American workers, with many studies
showingg the proportionof smokers to be we1L over 70 percent.
Acute Effects of Smoking and Cotton Dust Exposure on
Respiratory Symptoms
Thee symptoms oi Monday chest tightness begin gradually,. 3 or 4
hours after the cotton textile worker returns to work. A dry cough
and shortnesss of breath on exertion frequently accompany the
sensation of chest tightness. However, the physiologic reaction
associated with Monday chest tightnesss is not confined to the chest.
A low grade temperature, a 20 to 30 percent increase in the
peripheral white blood cell (polymorphonuclear leukocyte) count,
and a general malaise have been frequently reported. These systemic
symptoms suggest the presence ofl a host inflammatory response;
however, the relationship between these.syst'emic symptoms and the
symptom of chest tightness is not we12 defined.
By 1936, an association had been recognized between Monday
chest tightness and detectable loss of ventilatory capacity and
increased breathlessness (Prausnitz 1936). Recognition that in sus-
ceptible cotton mill workers, Monday chest tightness may be
followed by permanent respiratory disability led to the evolution of a
standard byssinosis case definition. Schilling and colleagues (1ig55)
developed: specific questions concerning. Monday chest tightness,for
the British Medical Research Council's respiratory symptom survey
questionnaire (British Medical Journal 1960). A positive.response to
the standardized questions regarding Monday chest tightness de-
fined the presence of byssinosis.
Molyneux and Tombleson (1970) conducted! one of the first
prospective studies.of byssinosis. At the initial examination, these
investigators interviewed 11,359 workers from 14 cotton spinning
mills and 227 workers from 2 manmade fiber spinning millsin
Lancashire, United Kingdom. Followup examinations were conduct-
ed at 6-month intervals over 3 years, from 1963 to 1966. Byssinosis
and bronchitis prevalence were determined by the use of the Medical
Research Council's questionnaire on respiratory symptoms (British
Medical Journal 1960), to which the Roach and Schilling (1960)
questions on chest tightness were added. Byssinosis wass graded as
follows (Molyneux and Tombleson 1970)1?
Grade 0: No evidence of chestt tightness or breathing diffi-
culty on the first day of the workweek
Grade 1/2: Occasional chest tightness on Mondays
' Nbte: OeHer investigaturs.have used grade 0 to.ind'.catc rhe absenrc of symptoms and grade 3
bvssinosu to
indiceie the prese of chronic uhevuctive pulmanary dl:...e IfY)PIbItlnnhnyv en al 1969t How a r,
this
category would also mclnd& the chronic ubsnructive .pulmonary dlner+e tHnt «curs
secondary.w.c,arecte smoking
smngcottamworkes; slnceCOPD« rsfre9uenalyinalgarettesmukers.notexposed1tocottondust,thiscaugnry
is not'speciic for disease related to cotton dust expasure.
409
11
