Lorillard
Untitled Document 04330401/0410
Fields
- Author
- Chilcote, S.D., J.R.
- Area
- TOTI/OFFICE
- Type
- LETT, LETTER
- Recipient
- Ave, J.R.
Related Documents:
- 04330311-0320
- 04330322-0331
- 04330332-0333
- 04330334-0378 Appendix B: Elements of Positive Strategy New Iwitiatives for Industry Action
- 04330379 Tobacco Institute Communications Task Force
- 04330380-0386 Communications Task Force Conclusions and Recommendations
- 04330390-0391 Communications Evaluation Task Force
- 04330392-0393
- 04330394-0410
Document Images
8' - 1 Budget
Although the Communications group has a defined operating
bud'get to fund planned.activities, historically, supplemental
funds can be obtained to support attractive opportunities
or rebuff detractors.
We suspect.that the unearmarked $7$0,00:0 is a contingency'
reserve for this purpose.
At any rate, if the Flanning Process outline in 5-1-A
is followed, the construct of the budget will become clear
,j k
to all.and individual budget items understable and controllable.
n

7 - 1 Programs
We applaud the insight revealed in this section.and agree
with the direction suggested.
On. Point #2, 7'-Il-A, we think no more than twe.representatives
of the tobacco industry should comprise the media team.
(Minor point admittedly, andl may be more a matter of style.)

9I - 1 Information Resources
We agree with the overview and the point that.a knowledgable
staff professional shouldievaluate information upon receipt.
We should also encourage the CTR information be. reviewed
and put.into some recognizable, usable form for retrieval,
understanding and media story use.

10 - 1 Products
Point #1: Speakers Program. We agree that this is one of
our strongest proactive efforts to influence
opinion. We agree that this effort should be
expanded.
Point #2:: Advertising. We agree..
Point #3:: Publications. The publication unit is doing,a
commendable job, but we believe that the
evaluation regardLing their non-contemporary
look and copy is subjective. A look to
properly staffing that unit might be warranted.
(4-1-B).
Point #4:: News Communications. We agree with the evaluation
but question why B'urson-M'arste]ller isn"t addressing
this shortfall.
Point #5: Films. We agree.

J. Robert Ave
January 201, 198'3
P'a g e Z
distributed but entirely within the tobacco "family"' such
as TAN communications. The publications group maintains
sensitivity to needs. reported from the field and the member
comparnies, and observes long-standing procedures covering legal
clearance of all of its. materials.
I know youiare familiar withithe speakers' work, which is en-
gendered through a.variety of promotional and follow-up
techniques employed by the support staff, who report, as you
will note on the organization chart, through Sparber rather than
Merryman because of the latter's necessary absence on the road
some 60 percent of the time.
Other than the broadcast or print interview engagements made and
kept by our speakers, and occasionall media questions which reach
them in the office as a result of their field contacts, media,
relations are maintained from ai single desk--- a procedure
understood throughout the TI staff -- to avoid any problem,s of
inaccurate or imprudent responses to media inquiries. This
function includes preparation and distribution of TP news
releases.
As I told'you, we.are ready to respond promptly to the particular
interests of the members of th,e review group~.
Cordially,
.
F Samuel D. Chil'cote Jr.
SDCjr:,mss
Enclosures
9
D
W
W
6
F
6
ro

11 - Measurement of Results
We agree with the overview but would addlthat results
of various research.is detailed to member companies
through their members on the communications committee.
Not always are these results printed, because some don't
lend themselves to other than an oral presentation.
Point #1: On the need for a "baseline public opinion study",
perhaps the ongoing Roper Study fills:this need.

5 - 1 Process & Procedures
Perhaps not totally formalized, but still apparently'
in existence, is a system.which recognizes the value
of integrating "objective development, planning,
accountability, etc."' as evidenced by exhibits 6-1-D,
11-1-G, 111-1-I.,
Point #1:: We agree that this type of formalized structure
to focus efforts would improve the results obtained, and
the prototype process outline (',5-]1-A) should be presented
as a basis for the TZ's development of a similar but
specific one for their use.
Point #2: We agree. Again, more formalizediprocedures
would be beneficial.
Point #3: We agree.

4 - 1 Staffing
While we agree that the in-house staff appears small in
relation to the monumental tasks to be accomplished, the
existence of an outside resource in the form:of a sophisticated
PR Agency (Burson-Marsteller) has the potential.of extending
the staff's reach.
We should.examzne whether the more extensive use of B-M for
ongoing activities might he a better solution to cyclical
staffing needs. Without such examination, however, we feel
that a number of news writers need be utilized, a massive
desk effort, to create the features, releases, etc. directly
to the daily and weekly newspapers across the country.
In point #1,. we applaud the productivity of the limited
Publications.staff, but question whether the bi-monthly
Tobacco Observer editor has to be solely concerned with
its' publication to the exclusion of all other activities.
On the other hand,. Anne Duffin"s memo ('4-1-B) is.an orange
flag regarding possible excessive demandis made on this
department. Althoughy there may be some other explanation
of the high personnel.turn-overl
On point #2,, we agree that the "'speaker's" program significant
contribution could be further enhanced by increasing the staff..
Point #3 clearly recognizes the workload on the existing staff..
~
Staff enhancement and.better orchestrated use of Burson- r
c.,
~
Marsteller might significantly improve the pro-active ~
6
productivity of the department. CJ'

THETOBACCC) INSTITUTE
18-5 c srJPE:PT suIiTlncHSr
l1', A511IAGT ON'. UC'_UUrni
_'U_'15;-qtt[IO HO(I d:4dl'J-H
January 20, 19,83
Mr. J. Robert Ave
Executive Vice President - Marketiing.
Lori'll.ard., A Division of
Loews Theatres, Inc.
666 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10103
Dear Bob:
SAMUEL D. CFnLCOTB',JR.
Prc>idenl
Following up on.our phone conversation yesterday I have set.
up and am enclosing a package of background information on the
PR Division, with sufficient copiies to enable you to share
them with other members of the review group as you choose.
The enclosure consists of a:division organization chart backedi
up with descriptions of each position.
R'egarding the Divis9ion's mission, it is "'communications t'o
achieve greater objectivity regarding tobacco-related contro-
versies in public opinions andpolicies."
The division does not operate with a set of written procedures,
which is relevant to one of the questions that arose in our
conversation. Because of the relatively small number of persons
involved, each has a clear understanding of the methods of
operations and the tasks to be performed in each area. G'enerally,
I can describe the operating procedures as follows. As you know,,
the director is one of the five senior people who report to me.
Bill Kloepfer is, of course,, working continuously with the three
vice presidents in his division, and in the case of Pete Sparber's
areas of special projects such as advertising, opinion research
and the fire prevention progra2n, shares responsibility for the
executions. He also is the direct conduit to the Communications
Committee,, andi in a necessary' but not directly related capacity,
acts a~s TI's principal. contact with INFOTAB and sister associa-
tions abroad.
The publications operation is clearly defined and includes all
published material!s, except news releases, coming from The Ihstitute..
"'Publications," in this case, do not include ma!terial widely

6 - 1 P1ans
We agree with the innate wisdom contained in the overview.,
An update of the long range plan and a semantic review
of terminology would be beneficial - eg., adding the
words "help to" to the objective "maintain the social
acceptability of smoking".. (Point #1).
On the.other handi, the looseness of the accountability
function allows the assignment of any appropriate person
available at that.point in time, since as noted earSier,
the staff is such a small and closeknit.groupt
on Points #2 and #3:: We agree..
