Jump to:

Lorillard

the Health Consequences of Smoking Part 1 of 4

Date: 19710000/P
Length: 468 pages
03765074-03765541
Jump To Images
snapshot_lor 03765074-03765541

Fields

Area
LEGAL DEPT FILE ROOM
Type
PSCI, SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION
BIBL, BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAR, CHART/GRAPH
Alias
03765074/03765541
Site
N14
Named Person
Yamamota
Amacher, R.H.
Anderson, W.H.
Anthonisen, N.R.
Asnes, D.P.
Auerbach, O.
Avtandilov
Ayers, S.M.
Baker, C.
Balazs
Bargeron
Bellet, S.
Berkson, D.M.
Best
Bing, R.J.
Blair
Blesa
Bock, F.G.
Boren, H.
Borhani, N.O.
Boutwell, R.K.
Bradess
Bratic, E.
Bunn
Burn
Carlysle, K.
Cederlof
Cook, D.G.
Cooper, T.
Cornfield, J.
Dalhamn, T.
Dayton
Dement, M.E.
Doll
Doyle
Dunn
Earl, C.J.
Epstein, F.H.
Falk, H.L.
Ferris, B.G., J.R.
Fitzpatrick, M.J.
Fletcher
Frazier, T.M.
Friberg
Garfinkel
Goldsmith, J.R.
Greenspan
Gsell
Hammond
Hanna, M.G., J.R.
Hariyama
Hecht, A.W.
Higgins, Itt
Hill
Hoffmann, D.
Holbrook, J.H.
Horn, D.
Hutchings, R.S.
Irving
Israel, R.A.
James
Jandl
Jennings, J.M.
Johnston, N.S.
Kahn, H.A.
Kannel
Keller, A.Z.
Keys
Kien
Kirsner, J.
Kjeldsen
Knox, D.L.
Kolbye, A.C., J.R.
Kotin, P.
Krumholz, R.A.
Leaders
Leb
Liebow, A.A.
Lilienfeld, A.
Long
Macmahon, B.
Mclean, R.
Mcmillan, G.C.
Mitchell, R.S.
Murphy, E.A.
Nadeau
Paffenbarger, R.S., J.R.
Paul
Peterson, W.F.
Peters, J.M.
Petty, T.L.
Plair
Rand
Rapaport
Regan
Reid
Ritchie, M.H.
Romero
Rosenmann
Ross
Sackett
Saffiotti, U.
Saphir
Schuman, L.M.
Shapiro, S.
Sherrod
Shimkin, M.B.
Shopland, D.R.
Spain
Stamler, J.
Strobel
Strong
Talesnik
Taylor
Tibblin
Travell
Truett
Underwood, P.B., J.R.
Van Duuren, B.L.
Victor, M.
Viel
Vonahn
Watts
Weir
West
Westfall
White, R.W.
Wilens
Wing
Wynder, E.
Recipient
Steinfeld, J.L.
Document File
03763512/03766002/S H Re 1979 Surgeon General S Report.
Date Loaded
05 Jun 1998
Named Organization
Bureau of Foods
Case Western Reserve
Ca Inst of Technology
Ca State Dept of Public Health
Chicago Board of Health
Chicago Peoples Gas
Chicago Westen Electric
Coke
College of General Practitioners
Council on Epidemology
Danish Twin Registery
Division of Vital Statistics
East Orange Va Hospital
FDA, Food and Drug Administration
Harvard School of Public Health
Health Insurance Plan of Ny
Health Research Foundation
Health Services Administration
Hew, Dept of Health Education and Welfare
Hri, Health Research Inst,Roswell Park
Inter Society Commission for Heart
John Hopkins School of Hygiene and
John Hopkins Univ School of Medicin
Kettering Medical Center
Marquette School of Medicine
Mayo Clinic
Mcgill Univ
Medical Center of Ny
Medlars System
Mental Health Administration
Natl Air Pollution Control Administ
Natl Center for Health Statistics
Natl Center for Health
Natl Clearinghouse for Smoking and
Natl Heart Inst
Natl Heart + Lung Inst
Natl Hospital
Natl Inst of Child Health + Human D
Natl Library of Medicine
Natl Research Council
NCI, Natl Cancer Inst
Niehs, Natl Inst of Environmental Health Sciences
NIH, Natl Inst of Health
Nj Va Hospital
Ny Univ Medical Center
Oak Ridge Natl Lab
Peoples Gas Light
Philadelphia General Hospital
Public Health Service
Regional Medical Program of Tx
Sgc, Surgeon General's (Advisory) Comm
St Vincent's Hospital and Medical C
Twin Registries of Sweden
Univ of Ca San Diego
Univ of Chicago School of Medicine
Univ of Co Medical Center
Univ of Louisville School of Medici
Univ of Mi
Univ of Mi School of Public Health
Univ of Mn School of Public Health
Univ of Pittsburgh Graduate School
Univ of SC Medical Scool
Univ of Wi
US Government Printing Office
US Natl Academy of Sciences
US Veteran Twin Registry
Va Hospital
Veterans Administration Central Off
Veterans Follow-Up Agency
Wa Hospital Center
Webb Waring Inst for Medical Resear
Western Collaborative Study Group
Western Infirmary in Glascow
Who, World Health Org
Wood Va Hospital
Ahf, American Health Foundation
American Heart Assn
Arteriosclerotic Disease Branch
Bureau of Adult Health + Chronic Di
Litigation
Stmn/Produced
Author (Organization)
Health Services Administration
Hew, Dept of Health Education and Welfare
Mental Health Administration
Public Health Service
Characteristic
OVER, OVER SIZE DOCUMENT
Master ID
03764103/6002
Related Documents:
UCSF Legacy ID
bmu51e00

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 11: bmu51e00 Log in for more options!
Contents Page iii': ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................. v Chapter 1. IlltrodUction .............................. ..1. Chapter 2. Cardiovascular Diseases ...................... 15 Minter3'. ChronicObstructi~v~eBronchopulm,onaryDisease .................................. 135' Chapter -i: Cancer ................................... 231 C'~;ai~tcr 5. Pregnancy ................................ 385 Chamer• Fil Peptic Ulcer .............................. 419. Chaq)rer 7., Tobacco~ Amblyopia ........................ ~ ~ ~ 431 0 a. iz
Page 12: bmu51e00 Log in for more options!
CHAPTER 1' General Consideratibns; Preparation of' tlhe Present Doowment„ and Summary of the Report
Page 13: bmu51e00 Log in for more options!
¢n IL._ ~ ~o %J
Page 14: bmu51e00 Log in for more options!
1 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS T': nia jor develbpment in the modern historyoftlhee#fectsaf ,rr,oK} ng on health occurred in 1950 with the publication of four rr"r( •,r~~rt.ive studies on smoking, habits among lung cancer pa- twn, -;:,nd among controls (I„ 4, G„7)., At that time,, the question. ":1rt, smokers more likely to get lung cancer thani nonsmok- on; .1;rhough some epidemiologists were satisfied that the an- .,~~ r r•t in the affirmative, others turned for confirmation to inwhaeh t'hesmoking habits of' large popula- t: :. r, - record'ed and the populations followed to identify sub- ~~,, The first report of Hammond and Horn in 1954t_~. si~,•nificantlyelevated overall death rates for smokers, to nonsmokers.. This elevation in death rates, almost ,.c-niined to those,whosmoked!cigarettes, together with~the:c- r-)r a ~;radient according to the amount smoked, changed ~-ion f rornione concerning only liang, cancer to one concern- r;ai (ieath rates and from one concerning smoking, to one. coTacer:nedd with cigarette snaoking:In effect, the question : r:.•. .'L)o cigarette smokers have higher overall death rates ,.,,n:.niokers and'smokers, of pipe& and cigars?;" theimbliicationi of thel:at'er reports ofthe majiorprospec-:r. ;adie in the late 1950's and,early 1960's, it became clear that cIWart•t,e. ;mokers had higher overall death rates than nonsmokers, a-, v:ril as higher death rates from a number of individiZaI causes of deuth..The question then becazne,"Why?,"«'hen the Advisory Committee on Smoking and Health to: the Surgeon General was established in 1962, it undertook the evalua- tion of the scientific evidence up to that time. The:conclusion of the Cc,ngmittee in its 1,9~6'4I Repbrt was that: "`Cigarettesrnoking, is a health hazard of sufficient importance in, the United States to war- rant appr opriateremedial action.'"" Not onlxdid theC~ommitteeconclud'e that the evidence clearly showed that male cigarettee smokers do in fact have higher death rates than nonsmokers butt that the convergence of epidemiological, experimental, and path- olUricad evidence also clearly imdicateda a cause-and-effect relation- ship for several, of the implicated diseases,, particularly cancer of tlhelung and, chronic bronchQtis,,, In several ot'herimportantdis- eases, the evidence oni biornechanisrns to explain epidenlio]ogical 3
Page 15: bmu51e00 Log in for more options!
associations was felt to: be inadequate at that time to draw firm, conclusions about a cause-and-effect relationship. Three and one-half years later:,, when The Health Consequences of Smoking : A Public Health Service Review, 1967' was publi'shed;, the conclusions of'the 1964 review were taken as a starting, point,, and the nature of the task of interpreting the scientific evidence was& restated as follows : 1. How much mort'ality and excess disability are associated with smoking?' 2. How much of this early mortality andl excess disability wouldl not have occurred if people had not taken up~ cigarette smoking?' 3. How much of this early mortality: and excess disability couldd be averted by the cessation or Vreduction of cigarette smoking,?' 4'. What are the biomechanisrns whereby these effects take place andl what are the critical factors in these mechanisms? That and subsequent reviews in 1968 and 1969 have provided some answers to these questions, particularly in summariziing the evidence for various theories as to how cigarette smoking affects the human~ organism to: produce elevated disease and death rates.. At least five different processes have been suggested whereby: cigaret!te smokers experience higher mortality or morbidity rates than do nonsmokers, 1. Cigarette smoking initiates a disease process by producing progressive irreversible damage. In this case, the total effect would be approximately proportional to: the total accumulated' dosage experienced over the years. Cessation of' smoking leaves impaire& function which does not improve appreciably but does not continue to deteriorate from continued exposure to cigarette smoke. How- ever, such function may deteriorate through aging or through exposure.to other harmfull agents. It appears that such a relation- ship probably exists for chronic obstructive lung disease and posr sibly for the development of atherosclerotic heart d7sease.. 2. Cigarette smoking initiates a disease process with continual repair and' recovery until some critical'! point is reached at which the process is no longer reversible: The totall effect would therefore be affected', to some extent by accumul'atedl exposure but would be affected also by the level of' contemporary smoking. Cessation of smoking, would result in a rapid reduction of risk provided the critical levell ini'tiatimg, an irreversible process has not been . reached. The evidence supports this kind of mechanism accounting both for the high d'ose-response relationshipl in lung cancer and for the reduction in risk frorn lung cancer among ex-smok:ers: 3. Cigarette smoking promotes a disease process either by provi:ding positive support to the development of a pathological condition or by interfering witlh and diminishing the normal capa- . 4
Page 16: bmu51e00 Log in for more options!
0 bAl.,IN , ,:, rF-„ ~.,-tranism to cope with and defend against adiseasefi.,r ~~ "f i~ i1 maV take place by promoting the development of a ~t;c1i ;~• ~+1 ,ii<e:rsetoaclinficaIlyrecognizable one, by promoting a, ;t:,te to a more severe form, or by increasing fatality rat.* ;,•%-O,•+~ disease states. This type of mechanism could ae- ~s;a„~t~rrr+rle~tl, ~7 increased mortaIi~tyratesfora numberofse- ., r~ :+ + s i or which there is no evidence that cigarette srnoking, r•++IEPin init'iating, the disease.S~ome of the ex~cessmor- W. , :!i n i ectious respiratory disease and from coronary heart take place through thi'& kind ofmechanssmf t r;c smoking produces a set of temporary conditions ,A i~:, rr+=,~ ~c the probability that acrit'ical event wil'loccurwith:o~. 6i.-~abili'ty and possibly fatal consequences. For example,, ~ ir4ence to support the theory that each cigarette cani pro- -t of condi'tionswhichincrease the probability of m~yocar-s., : ~vo through increased demand for oxygen at a time when is ,iiminished. Presumably,,once the supply/demand irmL :..+... :+11(?t,.iated, the probability of myocardial damage would normall level. Cessatian of' smoking should have an. ,~r,~'X+iiate effect of'reduci'ng the risk sharply for morbidity produced through this mechanism. r. cLe smoking, may be artificially related to excess dis- icath b~~ way of a clbse association with some other con- ~' --s;)o,-;ure which is found at a high levell in smokers, but ii:~ ni+ kers„and is itself responsible for the disease. The one ;, ,ieath for which cigarette smokers have elevated deathh generally interpreted in this way is cirrhosis of the :::cti mo;t heavy consumers of alcoholic beverages are smok- +i:+i >iince aleohol consumption is an important part of' the nat produces cirrhosis of the liver, the high rate of cirrho- .,r7if4ias,rcigarettesmokersi~sdiscounted as,resulting, from thisni, ci ()f artificial relationship. Some authors have proposed that there may be genetic factors that link smoking andi certain diseases in this fashion., Obviously, the cessat'iion, of'smokingwoul~dhave no effect on morbidity or mortality from diseases which are artificially related to smoking.. These different ways in which, cigarette smoking can be related t'oie1e%,ated morbidity and mortality rates are important considera- tions in attempting to estimate the potential public health benefits of giving up smoking. Fbr some types of relationship, there would haeno benefsts;for some,, rather small benefit'~s~~;for some,substan- tial' benefits, taking piace over a long period of time; and for others, substantial benefits taking place rather rapidly. During the past few years, a sharp reduction has taken, place in the cigarette smoking habits of the U.S'. population. The hTla- 5'
Page 17: bmu51e00 Log in for more options!
tional Center for Flealth~ Statistics has recently published a com- parison of smoking habitls in the U.S. in 1955 and! 1966 based on two large scale! household! surveys! (5). These! showed a drop, in, cigarette consumption in men under 55 years of'age but no appre- ciable change among those 55 or over. Among women, every age group showed an increase in the eleven year period. A recent sur- vey conducted for the National Clearinghouse forS'moking and~ Health, based on, a much smaller sample (approximately 5,000 intlerviews), was conduetied' in the Spring of 1970 (3) (itable 1). Eveni with the smaller number of cases„ it is clear that a much larger drop took place in the four years from 1966, to 1970 than in the eleven years fromi 1955 to 196'6. The drop extendedl to the age group 55-64 among men, again with no appreciable d'rop among men over age 6'5'. For the first time, the increase in, smok- ing among women leveled off,, or even dropped slightly among women under 55. The increase among women over 551 was of a lesser magnitude than previously observed. TABLE 1. Percentage of Current Smokers of' Cigarettes (regu- larly or oc~casional'ly)! by sex and age. U.S., Surveys: 1955axtd. 196B (CPS-Current' Polrutation Surueys) and 1970 (1VCSH- Surveyconducted for National Clearinghouse for Smoking & Healtli).' Male Female. A'Se. CPS 1955~~ CPS 196I6~ NCSH 1~970~. CPS 1955~ CPS' ~1966~ NCSH 1970 18-24 ---------- 53.0 48;3 2 47.0 33.3' 34.7 '31,1 25-34 ---------- 63.6 58.91 46.8' 39.2 43.2 40.3 35-44 ---------- 62.1 57.01 48.6' 35.4 41.1 39.01 45-54 ---------- 58.0 53.1 43.1 25171 37.3 36,0 55-64 ---------- 45.8 46.2 37.4 13A 23.0 24'.3 65 - ---------- 25.8 24.6 23!7 4':7 8.11 11.8 '1955' surveyy basedd onn approximately45;000 persons; 1966 survey,basedl onapproximately. 35,0000 persons; 1970 survey basedd onn approximately 5~000 persons. " Fist imated. With the massive changes in smoking behavior which have taken place among adults in the past few years, largely as an expression, of the desire to protect health, changes should be ex- pected in mortality rates among those groups which have experi- enced the greatest reduction bothiln accumulated dosage: and in concurrent dosage. An analysis of U.S: mortality rates for 1970 and the years to follow will provide a, very valuable addition to the knowledge concerning the effects of smoking on death rates. PREPARATION OF THK PRESENT' DOCUMENT Following the publication of Smoking and Health-Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon, General--.iln 1964, the fol- 6
Page 18: bmu51e00 Log in for more options!
ents were published as reviews of'the medical litera- •,r., r, nin~* the health consequences of'smoking, as called for Lai«-89-9!2: 1. 1T,_allth Consequences of Smoking, A Public Health Serv- 1.e~-iew: 19671. Flealth Consequences of Sinoking; 1968' Supplernent to ;., 1967 PHS R'eview.. ll alth Consequences of Smoking, 1969 Supplement to 11,67 PHS Review. -,, ti-)cumentsr.eviewed themedicallitleraturee which had =,'idished since the original Surgeon General's Report. This ot' publhshing a supplement to a supplement has become irtrticularly ini the light of the lackof availability of the rovie«•.s to the general! public: Therefore, when Public .. ...;-'°2''was signed i'ntolawon Apri~l1, 1970 calling, , for an:, ":(,ilth interval between the last report andl the new re- ; ~ itci'sion was madeto~ review the entirefieldl with em- ; u,e most recent additions to the literature.. ~,.~innad Clearinghouse forSmokin'g and Healthi ha& the 1 , ,i;iit% - forcontinuousrnonitoringandr cornpilati~on of the rarure on the health consequences of' smoking: This is through several mechanisrns: +<t:~ntifac r~eviewcorporation is on contracttoext'ract amti- :nukintr and health frorni the medical, and scientific litera- :a World. This organieationi provides a semi-weekliy acces- ith abstracts and copies of the various articles. Trans- :ffe: oalled for as needed. A;rticles of pertinence are identi- ;%. :t .,~eries of code words and phrases, \iitional Library of Medicine; through the Medlars sys- the Nationali Clearinghouse for Sinokiing and Healthi a r'. r: i;lY li:;ting, of articles in the smoking and health area. These. "re iv\ric«-ed,andpertiinentarticles aa•eord'ered•. Staff members keep, up with the current contents of inedical ;cierltific literatur•eand identify articles of pertinence. Ihi~i'tialdraft's,of'the present reviiewwereprepared by Clearing- house stafff and consultants who reviiewed the previous report's and i'ripntifi'ed those articles which have been important in, the develop- nw>>t of knowledge ini this fie1dL These were abstractedl and' placed. into tabularr form, andl a draft text of the report was prepared. 1•he tirs ', drafts of' the individual chapters were sent to experts for review;, criticism, andl comment with respect to the articles re- viewed,, those articles not included, andl conclusions. The drafts were then revisedi on the basis of these comments and rewritten, until' they met with general approval of the reviewers. The final'. 7 I ~% .
Page 19: bmu51e00 Log in for more options!
d'rafts were reviewed' as a whole by the Directlor of the Nationall Clearinghouse for Smokingandl Health, the: D!irectoroftheNar tional Cancer Institute, the Director of the National Heart and Lung, Institute, the Director of the National Institute of Environ- mental Health Sciences, and by six additional experts both within and outside of the Public Health Service. SUMMARY OF THE REPORT CARDIOVASCULAR DISEA'SES Coronary Heart Disease 1. Data frorn numerous prospective and retrospective studies confirm the judgment that cigarette smoking is a significant risk factor contributing tlo the development of coronary heart disease, including fatal CHD and its most severe expression, sudden an& unexpectedi death. The risk of CHD incurred by smoking of pipes and cigars is appreciably less tliani that incurred' by cigarette smokers. 2. Analysis of' other factors associated' with CHD1 (highi serum cholesterol, high biood' pressure, and physical inactivity) show that cigarette smoking operates independently of these other fac- tors andl can act jointly with certaini of them to increase the risk of CHD appreciably. 3. There is evidence that cigarette smoking may accelerate the patliophys'iol'ogical changes of pre-existing coronary heart disease and' therefore contributes to sudden death from CHD. 4. Autopsy studies suggest that cigarette smoking is associated withi a, significant increase in atherosclerosis of the aorta andl coronary arteries. 5. The cessation of smoking is associated with the decreasedl risk of' d'eathi from CHiD. 6. Experimental' studies in animals and humans suggest that cigarette smoking may contribute to the deveiopment of'CHiD and/ or, its manifestations by one or more of the following rnechaniisms : a~ Cigarette smoking, by contributing: toi the release of catecho- lhmines, causes, increasedi myocardial wall tensilon„contractionvel'ocity; and heart rate, and'thereby increases the work of the heart andl the myocardial demand for oxygen and other nutrients. b:Amongilndividualswith coronary atherosclerosis, cigarette! smoking appears to create an iinbalance between the increased needs of the myocardiumi andl ani insufficient increase in cor- onary blood& flow andl oxy genation. c. Carboxyhemoglobin, formed from the inhaled carbon mon- a.
Page 20: bmu51e00 Log in for more options!
P linishes the availability of oxygenito the myocardium ;,,l.;o contribute tolthe development of atherosclerosis. ~, •1,ilirmc~~nt of pulmonary function caused by cigarette ma s contribute to arterial hypoxemia, thus reduicing ~-:1,1,nn~t of ox~~y~gen, available t~o~~the~myocardi,um~o r!I- ~~iuoking may cause an increase in platellet adhesive- . .,1rirh might contribute tolacute thrombus formatiom ~';~tratr»ient' of'R~ecent A~ddi.tions~ toKnoivl'edg,e Relati'rzg~ ~,>>(l C'orona7y Heart Disease.-A number~ of~~ epidemi- ti~~;have~ prov~idledl additional evid'enc eence conc~erni~ng~ciga~- r. as a significant risk factor in the development of perimental studies on animals have suggested that ciga- king, particularly the absorbed nicotine and carbon mon= ',ntril,utes to the development of' atherosclerosis. ~rr>:clilar Disease~ : i-r,m numerous prospective studies indicate that ciga- ::i, ,, iy associated with increased mortalit'y, from cere- (6,ease. -iniental evidence concerning~ the relationship of srnok-~ ~; ck,•,1ei,rovascul~ar disease is, at~ present insu~Pficient to: a11bw~ concerning, pathogenesis., However, some of th~e~ ~~ --,gical cons~~it3erations~ discu~ssed' concern2ng, CHiD~ may~ t r.:,in to the relationship of smoking and CVD, particularUy .. inriarctian.~ t'ic Aortic Aneurysm smoking has been observed to increase the risk of ~:n>>onsyphilit'iic aortic aneurysm. , ~lib,,~ rad Vascular Disease. 1'. llnta, from ai number of retrospective studies have indicated tl,at cigarette smoking is a likely risk factor in the development of E eripherall vascular disease. Cigarette smoking also appears to be al factor in the aggravation of peripher.all vascular disease. 2. Cigarette smoking has been observed to alter peripheral blood iiuw and peripheral vascular resistance. CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE BRONCHOPULMONARY DISEASE 1. Cigarette smoking is the most important cause of chronic obstructi~~~e bronchopulmonary disease im the United States. Ciga- rette smoking increases tlhe risk of d~ing fromi pulmonary ernphy- senra and chronic bronchitis. Cigarette smokers show an increased prevalence of respiratory symptoms, including coughy sputum pro- 9 .4.~;.-r "'Nv:,.177" 4' WL ,.9s-..:

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: