Tobacco Documents Online

0 C D R A F T AJS/pm 5/14/796) ) f ) The Honorable Joseph A. Califano, Jr. The Secretary of Health, Education and We 1 tare Washington, D. C. 20201 Dear Mr. Secretary: I refer to your letter of April 26, 1979. For many years Lorillard has avoided directing the appeal of its advertising to young persons. -That undertaking began in the mid-1960's with the voluntary adoption by the major U.S. cigarette manufacturers of the Cigarette Advertising Code and was the result of the Industry's own initiative -- without the involvement of Government. Lorillard continues such~ avoidance today. Almost ten'years ago, on July 22, 1969, the then-Chairman of the executive committee of the Tobacco Institute, speaking for Lorillard and the other major U.S. cigarette manufacturers, advised the Consumer Subcommittee of the Senate Commerce Committee as follows: "With respect to cigarette advertising in [non-broadcast] media, it is the intention of the cigarette manufacturers to continue to avoid advertising directed to young persons;; to abstain from advertising in school and college publications; not to

l - 2 - distribute sample cigarettes or engage in promotional efforts on school and college campuses; [and] not to use testimonials from~athl!etes or other celebrities who might have special appeal to young people..." 1 who are 25 years or older. Since the mid-1960's when depicting models in adver- tising, it has been Lorillard's practice to use only models Everyone agrees that children should not smoke, ing Lorillard and the entire tobacco Industry. However, peeple why children begin to ~ GC 1u d - / - ,~,, ~ (~QP°`~'~}°"" smokej One portion of the recentliy-rel'eased HEW Report of the L Surgeon General on Smoking and Health, at page 16-12, indicates that"~e following,variables influence the decision to smoke: peer pressure, best friends who are smokers, parents who smoke, adolescent rebellion, imitation,of adult behavior and misconceptions concerning the risks of smoking." The Report identifies"social pressure and imitation of peers or family members who smoke"' as being among the major variables contri- buting to initiation of smoking.

c Mass nftedia advertising makes an easy and tempting target, but its influence is uncertain. Again, according to the 1979 Surg'eon General's Report (pages 17-5, 17-6): "Smokers depicted in films and television as well as cigarette advertising which tends to portray smokers in interesting and exciting environments suggest that attractive, desirable people tend to smoke. This would logically be expected to influence children and teenagers much as the media and advertising affect the behavior of adults. Yet, the relationship between exposure to the mass media and the initiation of smoking is difficult to isolate from the other concurrent influences to which the child is exposed. In fact, a variety of ...,pocial influences may interact to psychq influence some children to begin smoking." M---- -• - - } -tPlPVi~inn int ; y . director of HEW's Office of Smoking and Heal , expressed the view that it is incorrect to b e advertising as the initiator of smoking amo eenagers. "Advertising is cer- "If we can understand on

c e e f. Bottom ne 4 0 sion torillard is strongly of the view that cigarette advertising is a competitive instrumentality of the free market system. We utilize it in a manner intended to persuade adult smokers to switch from one brand to another. We neither direct the appeal of our advertising to children, nor do we encourage them to start to smoke. In sum, Mr.