Lorillard
States' Statutes Regulating Smoking in Public Places
Fields
- Type
- REPT, OTHER REPORT
- BIBL, BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT FILE ROOM
- Alias
- 03739168/03739179
- Site
- N14
- Request
- R1-004
- R1-037
- Copied
- Ahs
- Document File
- 03738759/03739179/S and H Re Allergic Responses Effect of Smokers on Non-Smokers Vol 1 82-77.
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- Named Organization
- Legislative Research or
- Ny Port Authority
- Trans Hudson
- Civil Aeronautics Board
- Legislative Assembly
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Author (Organization)
- Legislative Administation Comm or
- Legislative Research or
- Characteristic
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- Master ID
- 03738724/9179
- 03738726
- 03738727
- 03738728
- 03738729
- 03738730
- 03738731
- 03738732
- 03738733-8742 Proposed Rule 101-20. 109-10 Regulations of Smoking
- 03738744 Rules Proposed to Curb Smoking in Federal Offices
- 03738745
- 03738746 Smoking Ban Sought
- 03738747-8758 Use of Tobacco Practices, Attitudes, Knowledge, and Beliefs United States - Fall 640000 and Spring 660000
- 03738759 S&H Re: Allergic Responses - Effect of Smokers on Non-Smokers Volume I - 770000 - 820000
- 03738760 Prior Correspondence to 770000 Has Been Destroyed, As Authorized by Mr. A.J. Stevens.
- 03738761 Effect of Smoke on Nonsmoker
- 03738764
- 03738765
- 03738766-8767 San Mateo County Firefighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo Defendants and Respondents Order to Show Cause in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 288890
- 03738768-8779 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo, Et Al., Defendants and Respondents. Declaration of Leo C. Middendorf in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 288890 Exhibit B Employment Requirements - Physical Standards, No-Smoking Clause
- 03738769-8771 Exhibit D
- 03738772-8773 Exhibit E
- 03738774 Exhibit F
- 03738775 Exhibit C
- 03738776 Exhibit B Employment Requirements - Physical Standa Rds, No-Smoking Clause
- 03738780-8786 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo, Et Al., Defendants and Respondents. Declaration of John Mollinelli Jr. In the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 268890
- 03738782 Exhibit G
- 03738783 Exhibit H
- 03738784 Exhibit I Nepotism
- 03738785 Exhibit J
- 03738786 Proof of Service by Mail
- 03738787-8820 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners, Vs. City of San Mateo, Defendants and Respondents. Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief and for Writ of Mandate and Declaratory Relief in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo
- 03738821-8839 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo, Defendants and Respondents. Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief Petition for Writ of Mandate in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 268890
- 03738837 Verification
- 03738838-8839 Exhibit 'a' Employment Agreement
- 03738840-8841 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03738842 Memorandum to the Committee of Counsel
- 03738843-8860 Irene C. Parodi Petitioner, US. Merit Systems Protection Board and Office of Personnel Management Respondents Opinion Appeal From the Merit Systems Protection Board Argued: 820210 Submitted 820413 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Mspb No. Sf 83i Lo9012 No. 80-7671
- 03738862
- 03738863-8864 Ashrae Seeks More Ventilation in Comm. Bldgs.
- 03738865
- 03738868-8872 Mind If I Smoke?
- 03738873-8876 The Perils of Second-Hand Smoking
- 03738883-8884
- 03738885
- 03738886-8887 He Wants Cigarette and Choice of Seat
- 03738889
- 03738890-8891
- 03738892-8893
- 03738894-8895
- 03738896
- 03738897
- 03738898
- 03738899
- 03738900
- 03738901-8902
- 03738903
- 03738904-8905 TI Newletter
- 03738906-8914 Smoking in the Workplace
- 03738915-8916
- 03738917-8920 Greater Rockford Food Service, Etc., Plaintiff, Vs Joseph Orthoefer, Etc, Et Al, Defendants. Memorandum of Decision State of Illinois in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit County of Winnebago No.76-2447
- 03738921-8922 Greater Rockford Food Service Plaintiff, A Chapter of the Chicago and Illinois Restaurant Association, A Not-for-Profit Corporation, Plaintiff, and City of Rockford, A Municipal Corporation, Intervening Petitioner, Vs. Joseph Orthoefer, Administrator of the Winnebago County Health Department, Et Al., Defendant. Judgement Order State of Illinois in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit County of Winnebago in Chancery No. 76-2447
- 03738923
- 03738924-8925 If You're Hooked on Gigarettes, Read on
- 03738926
- 03738927
- 03738928
- 03738929-8932 Business Smoking Survey
- 03738933
- 03738934-8935 Smoking in Public Places ... Professors Disagree
- 03738936
- 03738937
- 03738938-8939 Statement of the Pennsylvania Tavern Association with Respect to Smoking Ordinances and Laws.
- 03738940-8941 Nonsmokers Try to Clear the Air
- 03738942-8943
- 03738944
- 03738945-8947 A Smoker's Lament
- 03738948
- 03738949-8950
- 03738951
- 03738953 Matter in Dispute Between Cala Foods. Inc, and Retail Clerks Union Local 648 Involving the Discharge of Jack Hamm
- 03738954-8975 in the Matter of Arbitration Between Cala Foods, Inc. And Retail Clerks Union Local 648 Concerning the Termination of Jack W. Hamm Opinion and Award of John Phillip Linn
- 03738976
- 03738977 Experts Defend Public Smoking
- 03738978-8979 Panel Told Smoking Not Hurting Non-Smokers
- 03738980-8981 Conclusion of Mcaward Case in East Boston District Court Involving A Non-Smoking Passenger on Board American Airlines Flight, Boston Logan Airport, 780515
- 03738982-8984 the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Vs. John Mcaward, East Boston District Court, East Boston, Massachusetts, 780711
- 03738985-8986
- 03738987-8988 Cigarette Smoking the Facts About Your Lungs
- 03738989-8990 Companies Put Up the 'No-Smoking Sign
- 03738991
- 03738992 Smoking Limits Aim of Director of Health Agency
- 03738993-8994 Winnebago County Smoking Ordinance
- 03738995-8998 Winnebago County Smoking Ordinance
- 03738999-9001 Ordinance
- 03739003
- 03739004-9006 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, V. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Complaint State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75ws4270
- 03739007-9009 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, Vs. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Answer State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739010-9012 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, Vs. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Amended Complaint State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739013-9016 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, Vs. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Answer to Amended Complaint State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739017-9019 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, US. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Order State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739020-9021 Wm. T. Mccracken Vs. O.B. Sloan Plaintiff's Document List North Carolina Mecklenburg County in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739022-9023 Effect of Smoke on Non Smokers
- 03739025-9026 Arbitrator Bars General No-Smoking Rule
- 03739027-9054 in the Matter of Arbitration Between Schien Body & Equipment Co., Inc. And United Steelworkers of America, Local Union No. 8557 Fmcs No. 77k17279 No Smoking Rule Grievance No. 77-1 Decision of Arbitrator
- 03739057-9058 Alexandria Smoke Eaters Can't
- 03739059
- 03739062 Lighting A Fire Under Smokers
- 03739063 Lighting Up? Bounced Out
- 03739064
- 03739065 Virginia Town Bars Smokers As Firemen
- 03739066-9067
- 03739068-9069
- 03739071-9072
- 03739073
- 03739074
- 03739075-9076 Smoking Restrictions Are Proving Popular But Hard to Enforce
- 03739080 Federal Judge Cites the Constitution in Refusing Smoking Ban in Public Building
- 03739081 Return to Prohibition: Smokers Arrested, Fined and Jailed in Chicago
- 03739082 Today's Anti-Smoking Prohibitionists Follow Path Blazed by Carry Nation.
- 03739083 Police - Can They Enforce Smoking Prohibition Laws?
- 03739084-9085 Lawmakers Balk at Excessive Smoking Bans,
- 03739086
- 03739087-9091 Kentucky Department of Labor Occupational Health Newsletter
- 03739092-9093
- 03739094-9095
- 03739096-9098 Dining Out: Should Smokers Be Segregated?
- 03739099-9100 Second-Hand Smoke - Is It Harmful?
- 03739101
- 03739102-9103
- 03739104 Smoking Ruling Irks Gasp
- 03739105
- 03739106 A Puff for Duffy
- 03739107 Judge Nixes Nonsmokers' Court Suit
- 03739108 A Smoking Issue Ignites
- 03739109 Pipe Smoker Is Assaulted; Man, 62, Is Arrested
- 03739110 2 'no Smoking' Cases Doused
- 03739111-9112 Members of Gasp Make Citizens' Arrests of Smokers in Orange County
- 03739113-9114 Two-Year-Old Smoking Ban Works - Even If It Is Unenforceable
- 03739115 His $100 Goes Up in Smoke
- 03739116 No Smoking
- 03739117 the Smoker in Elevator Case
- 03739118 Did Smoke Get in the Eyes of Justice?
- 03739119 Chicago Court's A Drag for Subway Smokers
- 03739120 Smoking Wasn't Worth It
- 03739121-9122 Smokers Facing More Restraints, Stiffer Penalties
- 03739123 Give That Man A Big Cigar?
- 03739124 Slavney's Stogie Gets A Grievance
- 03739125 Lights Out From Court, Complicates His Problem
- 03739126 Smokers Court Gets Tough
- 03739127 No Writing on the Wall Puts Legal Smoke in Their Eyes
- 03739128 City Smoking Ordinance Ruled Valid, Trial Is Set
- 03739129 Fired Up, Newsman Smokes Out Co-Worker
- 03739130 First Person Tried Under No-Smoking Law Acquitted
- 03739131 74 Held in Violation of New Smoking Law
- 03739132 the Case Hinged on Fire
- 03739133 Smokers on Bus Are Sentenced
- 03739134 City's No-Smoking Law Gets Court Test
- 03739135 Dup of Id 03739128
- 03739136-9137 Judge Chides Nations Conscience in Beach Smoking Verdict
- 03739138-9140 All Aboard for Chicago's Costliest Puff
- 03739141 Smoker Meets His Match in Court
- 03739142 Cigaret on An Elevator Costs Him $250 Fine
- 03739143 Smoking Landmark Case
- 03739144 Lack of Respect for Laws May Be Test Case
- 03739145 Nabbing Smokers Is Easy As Netting Smoke
- 03739146-9147 Gasp Still on War Path Even After Losing Case
- 03739148
- 03739149-9150 Newsletter
- 03739151
- 03739152-9153 They Fume About Smokers
- 03739154-9155
- 03739156-9157
- 03739158
- 03739159-9160 No-Smoke Break
- 03739161
- 03739162 Is Tobacco Smoke A Aealth Hazard to Nonsmokers?
- 03739163
- 03739164-9165
- 03739166 Smoke Billows From City Ordfnance Hearing
- 03739167
Related Documents:
Document Images
b
I N F 0 R=+1 A T I 0 N A L R E P 0 R T
STATES' STATUTES REGULATING
STIjUKIidG IN PUBLIC PLACES
Iegislative resea _rd'-;
i.d20 state capftci,'saiem, oregon 97310
phone (503) 378 8871
JANUARY 14, IL977
76: 69
.r
Legis!acive Research is a componer.t of the Legislative Administration Cemq:ittee
op

C
LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
leyislative Researcti wa5 cre<,f~d wiLhin Lhe lv()isldtivc~ Ur.i in-
istration Committee to conduct non-partisan research on subjects of
interest to members of the Legislative Assembly. All Legislative
Research reports are initiated by members or comnittees of the
Legislative Assembly and are of a non-confidential nature. Requests
staff in order to avoid duplication of research efforts.
for items to be researched are coordinated with other legislative
Reports of the Legislative Research office include RESEARCH
REPORTS, RESEARCH MONOGRAPHS, and INFORMATIONAL REPORTS. RESEARCH
REPORTS are extensive considerations, including analysis, of a topic;
RESEARCH MONOGRAPHS are limited considerations of a specific issue;
and INFORMATIONAL REPORTS include either a description or compilation
of materials available or a discussion of an issue using available
'published information with no original research or analysis.
r

C
STATES' STATUTES REGULATING
.Sb10KING IN PUBLIC PLACES
(76:69)
The Legislative Research Office was asked to provide
information on the;statutes of those states which prohibit or
limit smoking in public places. The statutes of 26 states
were°located and are summarized in this informational report.
They are varied in purpose, with some prohibiting smoking as
a fire hazard, others as a health hazard, and still others as
a public nuisance.
It should be noted that the state statutes are not the
only restrictions on smoking. There are federal regulations,
such as the Civil Aeronautics Board requirement that all public
carriers provide adequate no-smoking areas to accommodate all
passengers who wish to be seated in such areas. State regula-
tory boards and commissions often restrict smoking, such as
the Oregon Fire Marshal's requirement that theaters
meet certain
fire codes in order that smoking be allowed. City and county
governments may prohibit smoking - in various facilities, such as
the prohibition on smoking in department stores in Chicago. It
should be further noted that the information contained in this
report is a compilation of the statutes and is not an assessment
of the level of enforcement of the statutes in the respective
states.
legislative research

' Alaska. Smoking is banned i.n Alaska in: (1) elevators,
(2) limousines for hire, (3) buses, (4) trains; (5) state-
~ .
operated ferry vessels, (6) indoor public places of entertain-
ment or recreation, including libraries, museums, concert halls
and theaters, (7) public schools, (8) state public meetings,
C9) health care institutions and health care laboratory waiting
rooms, rest rooms, lobbies and hallways, and (10) any place of
business where posted by the person responsible for that
business. Public buildings and hospitals are required to pro-
vide reasonable smoking areas unless prohibited for public
safety or the preservation of the buildings and their contents.
The penalties are a civil fine of not less than five dollars
nor more than $25 for each smoking violation and not less than
$10 nor more than'$100 for each failure of a person to post no
smoking signs in areas under his control where smoking is
prohibited.l
Arizona: - The statutory prohibitions against smoking in
Arizona are similar to those in Alaska, with smoking banned in:
. . - _. . .. _. _ . . ,_ ,. _ .
or'concert ha~lls, (6) buses which are used
by or open to the public, (7) waiting rooms, rest rooms, lobbies
or hallways.of any health care institution, (8) public waiting
rooms of any health-associated laboratories or facilities, (9)
public
school
waiting rooms of any medical practitioner, and (10) public
buildings. Some exceptions to otherwise prohihited
lAlaska Statutes, sections 18.35.300 to 18.35.340.
2
(2) indoor theaters,`(3) lib'raries, (4) art
areas
.
I
}eaislative research

are allowed if they are designated as smoking a-reas. Viola-
tion of the no-smoking statutes is a misdemeanor punishable
by a fine of not less than $10 nor more than $100.2
California. Smoking is regulated in California in (1)
public schools and (2) public carriers. For schools and
community colleges; smoking is prohibited except in areas
otherwise designated by the governing board of the school
district. Violation of the statute is "good" cause for
suspension or expulsion. With regard to common carriers, the
law provides that all trains, buses, planes and streetcars
with departure within the state must provide posted no-smoking
3
areas.
Connecticut. Smoking is regulated in (1) public convey-
ances and (2) public meetings. For public conveyances, including
buses and trains, smoking is prohibited in areas not especially
designated for smoking. Violators may be fined not more than
$25. Smoking is prohibited at public meetings in public
buildings where a no-smoking sign is posted. The fine for
violation of the public meetings smoking ban is not more than
$54
Delaware. Smoking on public trolleys and buses is pro-
hibited in Delaware.
$5 nor more than $25.5
The fine for violation is not less than
2Arizona :Zevised Statutes, section 36-601-01.
3AnnotateJ California Codes, Education, section 106~i2.5 and Public
Utilities, section 561.
4Connecticut Revised Statutes, sections 53-198 and 1-21b. -
SDelaware Annotated Code, section 11:1326.
3-
legisl.itive research
{

\,
Florida. Smoking is prohibited
Violation is a misdemeanor in the second degree
_z .
by a fine not to exceed $500.6
in elevators in Florida.
Geor ia. Smoking i s proh ib ited
and punishable
in Geor~ia in (1) elevators,
(2) public transportation vehicles, and (3) any area used by
or open to the public which is clearly designated by a no-smoking
sign. Violation is punishable by a fine of not less than $10
nor more than $100. Georgia also recognizes the right of local
lati.~;naking bodies and state agencies to designate other no-smoking
areas.7
Hawaii. Smoking could be recognized as a public nuisance
in Hawaii and county councils are authorized to make ordinances
resticting such nuisances.8
Iowa. Iowa, like Hawaii, has a broadly worded public
nuisance statute which could be construed to include smoking
"in any place to the prejudice of others." The fine for viola-
tion of the public nuisance statute is not to exceed $1,000 or
imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year.9
where smoking is posted as being prohibited.
machine shops, and
or other buildings
No-smok:ng signs
must be posted in all cases. The fine for smoking
area is five dollars,10
bFlorida Statutes Annotated, section 823.12.
Code of Georgia Annotated, section 26-9910.
i n a no-smoki.ng
gfIakaii Revised Statutes, section 46-17. The statute refers
to
"noise, smoke, dust, vibration, or odors which constitute a public
9nuisance" (emphasis added).
Io~;a Code Annotated, section 657.2(2).
lOl,Iain Revised Statutes, section 25-2433.,
-4-
3eg.islath-e research

C
-T
Aiassachusetts. Smoking is banned or regul"ated in a broad
variety of facilities in Massachusetts, including: (1) polling
-t
places, (2) public meetings, (3) elevators, (4) suPerinarkets,
(5) certain mass transit conveyances, (6) museums, (7) libraries,
(8) hospitals, (9) nursing homes, (10) certain public convey;tnces,
(11) theaters, (.12-) public halls, (13) special halls, (14) factories;
(15) workshops, (16) mercantile establishments, (17) docks, wharves,
and warehouses, (18) school buses, and (19) buildings used to
stable horses or mules unless those buildings have been made fire
may be designated. In addition to those areas listek', the Board
of Fire Prevention is authorized to make such regul;'ions against
smoking a-; deemed necessary for the public safety. ~~ines for
violations range from $20 to $200, the latter for smoking in
stables.ll ,
resistant. For many of the facilities, special smoking areas
Michigan.
Smoking is prohibited in Michigan in (1) public
elevators and (2) any room, hall, place, or auditorium where a
be held during the course of the day ~ The penalty for smoking
boxing, sparring, or wrestling exhibition is being held or will
in an elevator is $50 or 90 days,imprisionment.
for the enforcement of the boxing and wrestling resf--iction li
S
with the promoter who may lose his license if there is a violation.12,
Massachusetts General Laws, sections 54:73, 270:21, 148:28,
90:7B, and 272:86 (C) and (F).
12biichigan Compiled Laws, sections 408:820 and 431:124.
11
5 - . ~~~} ie$islative research

1- 1
Minnesota. The prohibition against smoking in public
Mississippi.'_'Smoking a cigar or pipe on passenger buses
places in Minnesota incluides, but is not limited to: (1) public
. -~ meetings, (2) restaurants, (3) retail stores, (4) offices, (5)
public conveyances, (-6) schools, (7) hospitals and nursing homes,
and (7) auditoriums, arenas, and meeting rooms. Excluded are
private offices occupied exclusively by smokers, even though
non-smokers may visit these offices. Violation of the no-smoking
statutes is a petty misdemeanor and any state or local board
health can obtain an injunction against furt.her violati.ons.
l3
Violation of an injunction is contempt of court.
or coaches while
of
in service on any state highti:,ay is prohibited
in Mississippi. Before a violation can occur, the driver must
request the passenger to stop smoking. Violation is a mis-
demeanor which is punishable by a fine of not more than $500 or
not more than 30 days in jail or both.l4
Nebraska: With the exception of designated smoking areas,
smoking is prohibited in (1) hospital patient rooms and patient
areas,. - C2) elevators, :(3) indoor theaters, .(4) libraries, (5)
=art museums,-.;.[6}" concert halls, anc'. (7) puhlicc
signs must be posted in -'eleyatoi's.
. _ __. . _: .
15
1
0 nor ,nore than $100.
is a fine of not less than ~
13
Diinnesota Statutes Annotated, sections 144.412 to 144.417:
14mississippi Code Annotated, section 97-35-1 (4), (7).
1SRevised Statutes of Ncbraska, section 28-1031.01.
6-
legisiative research -
f

New Jersey. Smoking on buses, trolly cars and railroad
passenger cars with no-smoking signs posted is banned.' Vio-
a
lators are deemed disorderly persons and may be fined not more
than $25. In addition, the statutes grant the New York Port
Authority and its Trans-Hudson Corporation authorization to
prohibit smoking i~n any facilities owned or operated by the
authority in New Jersey. The penalty for the first offense
is not to exceed $50 or 30 days or both with greater penalties
for subsequent offenses,16
New York. - Smoking is prohibited in (1) any form of mass
transportation and (2) any indoor facility while in use by the
public. As is the case with many of the other states' statutes,
certain areas, such as rest rooms and lobbies, may be excepted.
The fine for violators is not less than $10 nor more than $100.17
North Dakota. Persons responsible for public buildings in
North Dakota are authorized to post signs for smoking and no-
smoking areas. Smoking in a no-smoking area is a class B mis-
demeanor which is punishable by a fine of not more
.an individual or $1,000 for an organization.18
Ohio. A person on a street car in Ohio must st.jp smoking
when requested to do so b;- the driver or other person in authori;y.
Failure to do so is punishable by a fine of not more than $10.19
16
New Jersey Statutes Annotated, sections 2A:170-65, 32:1-146.4
and 32:1-146.5. 0
~,
17New York Annotated Code, Public Health, section 1399-o,p,q. -13
18North Dakota Century Code, section 48-05-07. W
190hio Revised Code Annotated, sections 4951.57 and 4951.99(c). ~
~
~
7 - ~'4~kpnr~ legislative research
10

Oklaliorra. Smoking and no-smoking areas are detiignated
in permanent indoor public areas in Oklahoma by the persons
.`
respontiib]e for i.hosc arc,s. SrIcli nrcas include (1) c7cvators,
(2) theaters, (3) libraries, (4) art galleries, (5) museums,
(6) concert halls, (7) buses, and (8) roller skating rinks.
Violation of the smoking ban is a misdemeanor punishable by
a fine of not less than $10 nor more than $100.20
Oregon. Smoking is banned in (1) elevators, (2) hospital
rooms in which more than one person is accommodated, and (3)
meetings of any public body in Oregon. There is a $10 fine
for persons smoking in elevators and at public meetings and
a $100 fine for persons in authority failing to post no-smoking
signs in elevators. Illegal smoking in hospital rooms is a
misdemeanor for which the maximum fine is $250.21
Pennsylvania. Smoking is banned in Pennsylvania in any
auditorium, movie theater, or the balcony or gallery of any
theater. In addition, city councils are empowered to ban
smoking in retail stores with 25 or 'more 'employes or the
capacity to accommodate 300 or more_persons.
Excepted from
this provision'are restaurants, rest rooms, beauty parlors,
.
executive offices and designatea smokzng rooms.
O
W
200k ~
lahoma Statutes Annotated, section 21-1247. W
210regon Revised Statutes, section 479.015, 441.815, 441.990, ~
192.710 and 192.990.
22
Pennsylvania Statutes Annotated, sections 35:1225 and 53:3702.
8
22
r
.
Iegislative research
