Lorillard
Smokers Facing More Restraints, Stiffer Penalties
Fields
- Author
- Debes, C.L.
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT FILE ROOM
- Alias
- 03739121/03739122
- Type
- NEWS, NEWSPAPER ARTICLE
- Named Organization
- Ash, Action on Smoking & Health
- Assn for Commerce + Industry
- Assn for Nonsmokers Rights
- Associated Press
- Chicago Ritz Carlton
- Chicago Transit Authority
- Circuit Court of Cook County
- Detroit Pontial Stadium
- Group Against Smokers Pollution
- Mn Board of Health
- Natl Restaurant Assn
- New Orleans Superdome
- Pillsbury
- TI, Tobacco Inst
- American Lung Assn
- Named Person
- Decavalcante, K.
- Duffin, A.
- Frankl, A.
- Kahn, P.
- Kristan, J.J.
- Moore, J.
- Surgeon General
- Zurkowski, L.
- Document File
- 03738759/03739179/S and H Re Allergic Responses Effect of Smokers on Non-Smokers Vol 1 82-77.
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- Request
- R1-004
- R1-037
- R1-127
- R1-129
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Author (Organization)
- Associated Press
- Characteristic
- ILLE, ILLEGIBLE
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- Master ID
- 03738724/9179
- 03738726
- 03738727
- 03738728
- 03738729
- 03738730
- 03738731
- 03738732
- 03738733-8742 Proposed Rule 101-20. 109-10 Regulations of Smoking
- 03738744 Rules Proposed to Curb Smoking in Federal Offices
- 03738745
- 03738746 Smoking Ban Sought
- 03738747-8758 Use of Tobacco Practices, Attitudes, Knowledge, and Beliefs United States - Fall 640000 and Spring 660000
- 03738759 S&H Re: Allergic Responses - Effect of Smokers on Non-Smokers Volume I - 770000 - 820000
- 03738760 Prior Correspondence to 770000 Has Been Destroyed, As Authorized by Mr. A.J. Stevens.
- 03738761 Effect of Smoke on Nonsmoker
- 03738764
- 03738765
- 03738766-8767 San Mateo County Firefighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo Defendants and Respondents Order to Show Cause in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 288890
- 03738768-8779 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo, Et Al., Defendants and Respondents. Declaration of Leo C. Middendorf in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 288890 Exhibit B Employment Requirements - Physical Standards, No-Smoking Clause
- 03738769-8771 Exhibit D
- 03738772-8773 Exhibit E
- 03738774 Exhibit F
- 03738775 Exhibit C
- 03738776 Exhibit B Employment Requirements - Physical Standa Rds, No-Smoking Clause
- 03738780-8786 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo, Et Al., Defendants and Respondents. Declaration of John Mollinelli Jr. In the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 268890
- 03738782 Exhibit G
- 03738783 Exhibit H
- 03738784 Exhibit I Nepotism
- 03738785 Exhibit J
- 03738786 Proof of Service by Mail
- 03738787-8820 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners, Vs. City of San Mateo, Defendants and Respondents. Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief and for Writ of Mandate and Declaratory Relief in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo
- 03738821-8839 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo, Defendants and Respondents. Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief Petition for Writ of Mandate in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 268890
- 03738837 Verification
- 03738838-8839 Exhibit 'a' Employment Agreement
- 03738840-8841 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03738842 Memorandum to the Committee of Counsel
- 03738843-8860 Irene C. Parodi Petitioner, US. Merit Systems Protection Board and Office of Personnel Management Respondents Opinion Appeal From the Merit Systems Protection Board Argued: 820210 Submitted 820413 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Mspb No. Sf 83i Lo9012 No. 80-7671
- 03738862
- 03738863-8864 Ashrae Seeks More Ventilation in Comm. Bldgs.
- 03738865
- 03738868-8872 Mind If I Smoke?
- 03738873-8876 The Perils of Second-Hand Smoking
- 03738883-8884
- 03738885
- 03738886-8887 He Wants Cigarette and Choice of Seat
- 03738889
- 03738890-8891
- 03738892-8893
- 03738894-8895
- 03738896
- 03738897
- 03738898
- 03738899
- 03738900
- 03738901-8902
- 03738903
- 03738904-8905 TI Newletter
- 03738906-8914 Smoking in the Workplace
- 03738915-8916
- 03738917-8920 Greater Rockford Food Service, Etc., Plaintiff, Vs Joseph Orthoefer, Etc, Et Al, Defendants. Memorandum of Decision State of Illinois in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit County of Winnebago No.76-2447
- 03738921-8922 Greater Rockford Food Service Plaintiff, A Chapter of the Chicago and Illinois Restaurant Association, A Not-for-Profit Corporation, Plaintiff, and City of Rockford, A Municipal Corporation, Intervening Petitioner, Vs. Joseph Orthoefer, Administrator of the Winnebago County Health Department, Et Al., Defendant. Judgement Order State of Illinois in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit County of Winnebago in Chancery No. 76-2447
- 03738923
- 03738924-8925 If You're Hooked on Gigarettes, Read on
- 03738926
- 03738927
- 03738928
- 03738929-8932 Business Smoking Survey
- 03738933
- 03738934-8935 Smoking in Public Places ... Professors Disagree
- 03738936
- 03738937
- 03738938-8939 Statement of the Pennsylvania Tavern Association with Respect to Smoking Ordinances and Laws.
- 03738940-8941 Nonsmokers Try to Clear the Air
- 03738942-8943
- 03738944
- 03738945-8947 A Smoker's Lament
- 03738948
- 03738949-8950
- 03738951
- 03738953 Matter in Dispute Between Cala Foods. Inc, and Retail Clerks Union Local 648 Involving the Discharge of Jack Hamm
- 03738954-8975 in the Matter of Arbitration Between Cala Foods, Inc. And Retail Clerks Union Local 648 Concerning the Termination of Jack W. Hamm Opinion and Award of John Phillip Linn
- 03738976
- 03738977 Experts Defend Public Smoking
- 03738978-8979 Panel Told Smoking Not Hurting Non-Smokers
- 03738980-8981 Conclusion of Mcaward Case in East Boston District Court Involving A Non-Smoking Passenger on Board American Airlines Flight, Boston Logan Airport, 780515
- 03738982-8984 the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Vs. John Mcaward, East Boston District Court, East Boston, Massachusetts, 780711
- 03738985-8986
- 03738987-8988 Cigarette Smoking the Facts About Your Lungs
- 03738989-8990 Companies Put Up the 'No-Smoking Sign
- 03738991
- 03738992 Smoking Limits Aim of Director of Health Agency
- 03738993-8994 Winnebago County Smoking Ordinance
- 03738995-8998 Winnebago County Smoking Ordinance
- 03738999-9001 Ordinance
- 03739003
- 03739004-9006 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, V. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Complaint State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75ws4270
- 03739007-9009 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, Vs. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Answer State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739010-9012 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, Vs. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Amended Complaint State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739013-9016 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, Vs. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Answer to Amended Complaint State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739017-9019 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, US. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Order State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739020-9021 Wm. T. Mccracken Vs. O.B. Sloan Plaintiff's Document List North Carolina Mecklenburg County in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739022-9023 Effect of Smoke on Non Smokers
- 03739025-9026 Arbitrator Bars General No-Smoking Rule
- 03739027-9054 in the Matter of Arbitration Between Schien Body & Equipment Co., Inc. And United Steelworkers of America, Local Union No. 8557 Fmcs No. 77k17279 No Smoking Rule Grievance No. 77-1 Decision of Arbitrator
- 03739057-9058 Alexandria Smoke Eaters Can't
- 03739059
- 03739062 Lighting A Fire Under Smokers
- 03739063 Lighting Up? Bounced Out
- 03739064
- 03739065 Virginia Town Bars Smokers As Firemen
- 03739066-9067
- 03739068-9069
- 03739071-9072
- 03739073
- 03739074
- 03739075-9076 Smoking Restrictions Are Proving Popular But Hard to Enforce
- 03739080 Federal Judge Cites the Constitution in Refusing Smoking Ban in Public Building
- 03739081 Return to Prohibition: Smokers Arrested, Fined and Jailed in Chicago
- 03739082 Today's Anti-Smoking Prohibitionists Follow Path Blazed by Carry Nation.
- 03739083 Police - Can They Enforce Smoking Prohibition Laws?
- 03739084-9085 Lawmakers Balk at Excessive Smoking Bans,
- 03739086
- 03739087-9091 Kentucky Department of Labor Occupational Health Newsletter
- 03739092-9093
- 03739094-9095
- 03739096-9098 Dining Out: Should Smokers Be Segregated?
- 03739099-9100 Second-Hand Smoke - Is It Harmful?
- 03739101
- 03739102-9103
- 03739104 Smoking Ruling Irks Gasp
- 03739105
- 03739106 A Puff for Duffy
- 03739107 Judge Nixes Nonsmokers' Court Suit
- 03739108 A Smoking Issue Ignites
- 03739109 Pipe Smoker Is Assaulted; Man, 62, Is Arrested
- 03739110 2 'no Smoking' Cases Doused
- 03739111-9112 Members of Gasp Make Citizens' Arrests of Smokers in Orange County
- 03739113-9114 Two-Year-Old Smoking Ban Works - Even If It Is Unenforceable
- 03739115 His $100 Goes Up in Smoke
- 03739116 No Smoking
- 03739117 the Smoker in Elevator Case
- 03739118 Did Smoke Get in the Eyes of Justice?
- 03739119 Chicago Court's A Drag for Subway Smokers
- 03739120 Smoking Wasn't Worth It
- 03739123 Give That Man A Big Cigar?
- 03739124 Slavney's Stogie Gets A Grievance
- 03739125 Lights Out From Court, Complicates His Problem
- 03739126 Smokers Court Gets Tough
- 03739127 No Writing on the Wall Puts Legal Smoke in Their Eyes
- 03739128 City Smoking Ordinance Ruled Valid, Trial Is Set
- 03739129 Fired Up, Newsman Smokes Out Co-Worker
- 03739130 First Person Tried Under No-Smoking Law Acquitted
- 03739131 74 Held in Violation of New Smoking Law
- 03739132 the Case Hinged on Fire
- 03739133 Smokers on Bus Are Sentenced
- 03739134 City's No-Smoking Law Gets Court Test
- 03739135 Dup of Id 03739128
- 03739136-9137 Judge Chides Nations Conscience in Beach Smoking Verdict
- 03739138-9140 All Aboard for Chicago's Costliest Puff
- 03739141 Smoker Meets His Match in Court
- 03739142 Cigaret on An Elevator Costs Him $250 Fine
- 03739143 Smoking Landmark Case
- 03739144 Lack of Respect for Laws May Be Test Case
- 03739145 Nabbing Smokers Is Easy As Netting Smoke
- 03739146-9147 Gasp Still on War Path Even After Losing Case
- 03739148
- 03739149-9150 Newsletter
- 03739151
- 03739152-9153 They Fume About Smokers
- 03739154-9155
- 03739156-9157
- 03739158
- 03739159-9160 No-Smoke Break
- 03739161
- 03739162 Is Tobacco Smoke A Aealth Hazard to Nonsmokers?
- 03739163
- 03739164-9165
- 03739166 Smoke Billows From City Ordfnance Hearing
- 03739167
- 03739168-9179 States' Statutes Regulating Smoking in Public Places
Related Documents:
Document Images
C1sY.1tYL L. UE1t1:S
4xaoclalyd I'rc. µ7it"r
James Muorc Ilt a ciga-
rette. took a lo.n.q drog and
stepped aboard a euhway
train. Mnmcnta later, he
was under art'cst.
The next day, after
spending a night in Jnll. he
appeared in Itranch 95 of
Circuit Court of Cook
County, commonly known
as Smokcra' Court.
Some x00 pcrsons were
arrested last year for
llghting up on Chicnl;o
Transit Authorit) lrains
and buscs, a petty offcnsc
puniahnhic by fines of $30
to $300. Those !ikc Moore
who couldn't post i25 bond
spent a nlg~!t behind bors.
Similarly, tobacco smok-
en across the nation arc
encountering new re-
straints and stiffcr penab
Ues for indiscriminate;y
tndulging their habil.
An Associated Press sur-
vey shows that since mid-
19iJ nearly half the atatcs
1n the country have en-
acted laws restricting
smoking in public placcs.
Although enforcement is
normally lax, penalties
lange from token fines lo
60 days In Jail.
Federal regulations
Iimit smaking on airlines
and inlerstatc buses and
tralns. whllc pending law-
aults seek to outlaw the ni-'
cotine habit at New
Orlcans' Superdome and
Detroit's Pontiac Stadium.
Scores of restaurants
provide separate seating
for nonsmokers. Students
at several colleges and
universitles have voted to
ban the weed in class-
rooms. Some employcrs
forbid smoking on the Job.
Behind the curbs are a
growing numhcr of nuns-
mokcrs who say they are
entitled tu breathe smuke-
free air.
"For ycars smokers
have been able to sn ukc
wherever they aantcd,"
says Kare DcCavnlcnntc,
smoking and hcnlth con-
suitant for the American
Lung Assoclatton. "Now,
we're trying to switch that
around."
While C`hicngo'e crack-
down i.% unusually tough,
the nmoktng arrests dratn-
allse the chnnge.
"It Just didn't make
sense," sald Moore, a
I
1
hnusctn n t ChIcngu'e
nr
lUts Cnrlton who waa
nabUcd early this year. "It
w,1.9 kinda 1lncon9cloua to
light up. I gucy9 I knew It
was against the law, but
nobody ever paid alten-
lion."
Ilcfore the city's smok-
Ing ordinance was tough-
cncd, said one la.v
enforcement officinl,
"emokers were treated
like JaywalkcrA or aplttcra
- they wcre virtually Ig-
nored."
Only n few yenrs ngo-,
the Idea that ncnsmokcrs
const!tutcd a silcnt maJor-
lty whose rights were
bcing dcnled was almost
unheard of.
Mlss DcCavalcnnte
traces active participation
In a nonsmokcre' rights
movement to "the 1972
surgeon gtncral's report.
It included the first hard,
scicntific facts on the ef-
fects of secondhand
smoke.
"Whcrt Joe Citizen got
wind of It, he said, 'Hey,
that's me.' People uho had
always becn bothered by
smoke found out they wer
cn't alone."
Evidence that simply
breathing tobacco smoke
may be physically harmful
- "Involuntary smoking"
as It was callod by one gov-
crnment report - led
many nonsmokers to re-
evaluate the habit they
previously considered
merely annoying.
Today, a proliferation of
groups with such likely
namcs as ASH - Actton on
Smoktng and Hcalth;
GASP - Group Agntnst
Smokers' Pollution; and
ANSR - Association for
Nonsmokers' ttights - nc-
tlvetv cncournse nunemok-
ere to assert their right to
brcathe smokelesa alr.
The tobacco industr,v
says lhcre's no evidence
lh.tl hculthy nonsmoKCrs
are hnrmcd by being near
smokers.
The 1975 eurgcon gcner-
al's report sald, "Tubncco
smokc can t;c a slFnificnnt
source of atrnoapltcric pt4-
lullon In enclu+cd arc,s."
Ilut wlth inconchislvc slvc cid
cncc to dnte, nudicNl rc-
scn nhera are trytng lo
determine whclher ..rc
ondnan:l smoke Is dnngrr-
ous to all ut,nsmokcrs ur
nn Irritant only in peraoC'
wilh resplrntury and heart
allments.
A nonsmokcre move-
menl slo{;an, colncd by a
Drentwoud, N.Y., housc-
wifc, has bccn uned In rc-
cent ycars by countlc.s
nonsmokcrs who Inform
Cc.mlly, frlends and total
slrangcrs "1'cs, I do mind
if you smokc."
The firm, but polltc ap-
proach Is recr.mmcnded
by. moat nonsmokers'
CroupA.
Ncverthcicas, lhc movc-
mcnt also h,tis Its mllilants
who c:nploy quch tactics
as hiding ashtrays, un-
corkinb bo:ties of am-
monia whcn smokers 1!ght
up and carrying Iltlle fans
to blow the stuff back tnto
the othcr guy's face.
A Flint. ti(ich., school-
teacher recently endured
smoicc drlfling from an ad-
joining booth at a restaur-
ant throughout his mcal.
Upon finishing, he walked
over to the smoker and
dropped some gnawed
chicken bones on her plate.
"Ma'am, you've been giv-
ing me your garbage for
quite a while," he said. "I
thought you might llkc
some of minc."
Unaccustomed to such
rebuffs, even in lheir
milder forms, some of the
natlon's cstimaled 52 mfi-
lion smokcrs respond bet-
ligcrcnlly.
When Mlaml GASP
members donned gas
masks at a sports event to
prolcal heavy smoke and
poor ventilation, pastpres-
idcnt Arthur Frnnkl re-
calls that "one fellow to
show his hostility put three
cignrcltes In hls mouth
nnd lit them."
In F.ast Hnrtford, Conn.,
an angry smokcr took a
I
I
w~i
~
~
~
CQ
~
~
('D
tn
~
1
t1
\
~

4
I -
r
`
ph}siciarn to court, charg-
Ing he s,rayed her with a
d!sinfectant. After a three-
day trial. Dr. Joseph J.
Kriatnn, who Insisted he
merely doused the ciga-
rette, was acquitted by a
Jury of one cigarette
amoker one pipe emoker,
one cigar amo!ter, two
exsmokers and one person
who had never smoked.
Leonard Zurkowski, who
opened a no-ernoking tav-
ern In Milwaukee last
~r..r, c,id tt,c bar "uas a
grcr,t suc-css until one
niRht a bunch cf kids came
In, llt their eigarettee and
said we couldn't tell them
not to amoke.
^ltihen I told them their
rlghl to amokc stopped at
my nrse, they busted the
p:Uce up."
Deeoite auch incldents,
organized oppoa:!ion lo an-
tismoking 1egS~latioh was
minimal until recenltv,
coming mos;'.y frcm clgar-
, c~garetle-:.nd pipepuff-
Ir.g lawmakcrs. Defea;ed
bil;s «ere rei^troduced
time and agala, with In-
crcasing succcss
For r~ccrdes, the only
s^:oking regulations on
state books aere a Maine
la%% .erittrn In 1StH to pre-vent fires In millyarda,
stables and cecred
br.dges and a 1511 Utah
s:au°e thet ~ras !argel, Ig-
norcd.
In c.trly 1073. Arizona
became the'first atate to
enact IrFialatinn to protect
:Io^sm-kel i.
The hills principal lob-
b, ist w~.s a S-_ ottsdnle,
Arie.. uoman u-ho sa.. !.cr
Incu/,r!nc:t! In nor..mok-
cr~' right,- teg1 n e!tcn c-
bcsl friend dird of lung
cnncer at nge ^-9. It con-
trolled ,mnking In con-
ftned places such as
zztEeI.Co
elevators,thoaters,librar-
lee and bunca.
California and Connecll-
Cut, where the state hcalth
commlasioner carries his
own "no smoking" sign to
public meetings, followed
suit the same year by re-
.atricting smoking on com-
mon carriers. Oregon
issued a ban at meetings
of public bodies.
Seven etalea were added
to the list In 1974. Nona-
mokers' rights groups In
F!orida pushed for a law
that made iig!nine upln el-
evators an offcr:se puniah-
nbte bv a $300 fine or 60
days In fail.
The upswing In antia-
moking Icglslallon moved
Ir.to 1975 with the introduc-
tion of more than 400 bills
In 0, states. Many states
strengthened existing
In«s, and a dozen enacted
new bans. Including the
niost extensive yet: Ihe
Minnesota Clean Indoor
Air Act.
"This law ts a total rev-
ersal of the bnslc phlloso-
ph~. that smokers can
smoke whcrever there
isn't a 'r.o smoking' sign,"
sald I.s sponsor, Slate Rep.
Phyllis Kahn. 'The law
statcs specifically that
smoking is prohibitcd ex-
ccptin designated areas."
Hut If 19T3 wae a boom
year for lawa geared to
nonsmokcrs' rtg'tts. it also
'
was the year many bust-
nesses started taking a se-
rloua, and rather
dtsapproving, look at the
Issue. It CONts money to set
up special amoking areas.
Critlcs, Including many
lawtnakers. point to wlde-
spread lack of prosecution
under the laws and claim
they are unenforceable.
"It's silly to have a regula-
tion lhat can't be en-
forced,'' said one
California legislntor.
Anne Duffin of the To-
bacco Institute ngreed.
"You can't legislate cour-
tes-v," she said. "And
thnt's what these laws
amount to."
The National Restaurant
, Association has a poeltlon
statement oppoeing
"govcrnment mandated no
smoking sections."
Lawmakers In states
with emokinr bans eay en-
forcement Is dlfficult, and
most states don't even at-
templ it.
"It's the people In the el-
evators, the cicrks In the
stores and the nonsmokcrs
in the chee_koct lines, who
ty their remarks to offend-
ers are enforcing the law,"
said a Dade County, Fla.,
commissioncr.
The controversy haa
been particularly keen In
Minnesota, where the
Clean Indoor Air Act took
cfleet in August.
The Plllsbury Co., which
employs 900 persons at Its
national headquarters In
Minneapolis, Inltlally esti-
mated It could cost the
company {500,000 a year to
comply with the acl'
rcqulrrment of segregnled
smoking arens In offices
and factories.
After a trial period,
though, a Pillsbury
spokesman said "thc law
Is working out fairly well.
It's helped nonsmokers
greatly and although It
may cost us some money.
the problem Is more health
than dollars."
Despite Pillsbury's ac-
ceptance, the state's Asso-
clation for Commeres and
Industry conslders the rer-
ulations "unduly restr/c-
tlve."
Mlnnesola's restaura-
leurs are especially upset
with a requirement that
they segregace their amok-
Ir ); and nonsmoking cue-
lomers.
Still, a Minnesota Board
of Ilcalth spokesman aald
that it recent hearings to
clarify specifics of the act,
"The restaurant industry
was solidly against It, but
the ordinary citizens ap-
p)nuded It, and the great
majority of the teetimor.y
was for strict enforce-
ment."
'For years, smokers have been
able to smoke wherever they
wanted. Now, we're frying to
switch it around.'
- Conrulfanf for
Americon (un9 Aftociofion
6 0 9 ~ ~
