Lorillard
Smoking Restrictions Are Proving Popular But Hard to Enforce
Fields
- Author
- Kennedy, S.
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT FILE ROOM
- Alias
- 03739075/03739076
- Type
- NEWS, NEWSPAPER ARTICLE
- Site
- N14
- Named Person
- Arnold, J.
- Arnold, R.
- Campbell, K.
- Carnes, B.
- Fundenberg, L.
- Gordon, J.
- Hickman, D.
- Kaye, L.C.
- Marten, M.A.
- Nader, R.
- Simek, W.
- Stroud, F.
- Vilnius, D.
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- Document File
- 03738759/03739179/S and H Re Allergic Responses Effect of Smokers on Non-Smokers Vol 1 82-77.
- Request
- R1-004
- R1-037
- Named Organization
- Ak Lung Assn
- American Cancer Society
- Assn for Nonsmokers Rights
- Comm Insuring + Guaranteeing Anyone
- Consolidated Cigar
- Federal Aviation Comm
- Federal District Court
- Group Against Smokers Pollution
- Health Dept
- Hitch Inn Rail Bar
- Lung Assn
- Ma Bay Transportation Authority
- Mi Wayne County Health Dept
- People United to Fight Fanatics
- Characteristic
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Master ID
- 03738724/9179
- 03738726
- 03738727
- 03738728
- 03738729
- 03738730
- 03738731
- 03738732
- 03738733-8742 Proposed Rule 101-20. 109-10 Regulations of Smoking
- 03738744 Rules Proposed to Curb Smoking in Federal Offices
- 03738745
- 03738746 Smoking Ban Sought
- 03738747-8758 Use of Tobacco Practices, Attitudes, Knowledge, and Beliefs United States - Fall 640000 and Spring 660000
- 03738759 S&H Re: Allergic Responses - Effect of Smokers on Non-Smokers Volume I - 770000 - 820000
- 03738760 Prior Correspondence to 770000 Has Been Destroyed, As Authorized by Mr. A.J. Stevens.
- 03738761 Effect of Smoke on Nonsmoker
- 03738764
- 03738765
- 03738766-8767 San Mateo County Firefighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo Defendants and Respondents Order to Show Cause in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 288890
- 03738768-8779 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo, Et Al., Defendants and Respondents. Declaration of Leo C. Middendorf in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 288890 Exhibit B Employment Requirements - Physical Standards, No-Smoking Clause
- 03738769-8771 Exhibit D
- 03738772-8773 Exhibit E
- 03738774 Exhibit F
- 03738775 Exhibit C
- 03738776 Exhibit B Employment Requirements - Physical Standa Rds, No-Smoking Clause
- 03738780-8786 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo, Et Al., Defendants and Respondents. Declaration of John Mollinelli Jr. In the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 268890
- 03738782 Exhibit G
- 03738783 Exhibit H
- 03738784 Exhibit I Nepotism
- 03738785 Exhibit J
- 03738786 Proof of Service by Mail
- 03738787-8820 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners, Vs. City of San Mateo, Defendants and Respondents. Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief and for Writ of Mandate and Declaratory Relief in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo
- 03738821-8839 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo, Defendants and Respondents. Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief Petition for Writ of Mandate in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 268890
- 03738837 Verification
- 03738838-8839 Exhibit 'a' Employment Agreement
- 03738840-8841 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03738842 Memorandum to the Committee of Counsel
- 03738843-8860 Irene C. Parodi Petitioner, US. Merit Systems Protection Board and Office of Personnel Management Respondents Opinion Appeal From the Merit Systems Protection Board Argued: 820210 Submitted 820413 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Mspb No. Sf 83i Lo9012 No. 80-7671
- 03738862
- 03738863-8864 Ashrae Seeks More Ventilation in Comm. Bldgs.
- 03738865
- 03738868-8872 Mind If I Smoke?
- 03738873-8876 The Perils of Second-Hand Smoking
- 03738883-8884
- 03738885
- 03738886-8887 He Wants Cigarette and Choice of Seat
- 03738889
- 03738890-8891
- 03738892-8893
- 03738894-8895
- 03738896
- 03738897
- 03738898
- 03738899
- 03738900
- 03738901-8902
- 03738903
- 03738904-8905 TI Newletter
- 03738906-8914 Smoking in the Workplace
- 03738915-8916
- 03738917-8920 Greater Rockford Food Service, Etc., Plaintiff, Vs Joseph Orthoefer, Etc, Et Al, Defendants. Memorandum of Decision State of Illinois in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit County of Winnebago No.76-2447
- 03738921-8922 Greater Rockford Food Service Plaintiff, A Chapter of the Chicago and Illinois Restaurant Association, A Not-for-Profit Corporation, Plaintiff, and City of Rockford, A Municipal Corporation, Intervening Petitioner, Vs. Joseph Orthoefer, Administrator of the Winnebago County Health Department, Et Al., Defendant. Judgement Order State of Illinois in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit County of Winnebago in Chancery No. 76-2447
- 03738923
- 03738924-8925 If You're Hooked on Gigarettes, Read on
- 03738926
- 03738927
- 03738928
- 03738929-8932 Business Smoking Survey
- 03738933
- 03738934-8935 Smoking in Public Places ... Professors Disagree
- 03738936
- 03738937
- 03738938-8939 Statement of the Pennsylvania Tavern Association with Respect to Smoking Ordinances and Laws.
- 03738940-8941 Nonsmokers Try to Clear the Air
- 03738942-8943
- 03738944
- 03738945-8947 A Smoker's Lament
- 03738948
- 03738949-8950
- 03738951
- 03738953 Matter in Dispute Between Cala Foods. Inc, and Retail Clerks Union Local 648 Involving the Discharge of Jack Hamm
- 03738954-8975 in the Matter of Arbitration Between Cala Foods, Inc. And Retail Clerks Union Local 648 Concerning the Termination of Jack W. Hamm Opinion and Award of John Phillip Linn
- 03738976
- 03738977 Experts Defend Public Smoking
- 03738978-8979 Panel Told Smoking Not Hurting Non-Smokers
- 03738980-8981 Conclusion of Mcaward Case in East Boston District Court Involving A Non-Smoking Passenger on Board American Airlines Flight, Boston Logan Airport, 780515
- 03738982-8984 the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Vs. John Mcaward, East Boston District Court, East Boston, Massachusetts, 780711
- 03738985-8986
- 03738987-8988 Cigarette Smoking the Facts About Your Lungs
- 03738989-8990 Companies Put Up the 'No-Smoking Sign
- 03738991
- 03738992 Smoking Limits Aim of Director of Health Agency
- 03738993-8994 Winnebago County Smoking Ordinance
- 03738995-8998 Winnebago County Smoking Ordinance
- 03738999-9001 Ordinance
- 03739003
- 03739004-9006 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, V. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Complaint State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75ws4270
- 03739007-9009 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, Vs. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Answer State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739010-9012 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, Vs. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Amended Complaint State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739013-9016 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, Vs. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Answer to Amended Complaint State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739017-9019 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, US. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Order State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739020-9021 Wm. T. Mccracken Vs. O.B. Sloan Plaintiff's Document List North Carolina Mecklenburg County in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739022-9023 Effect of Smoke on Non Smokers
- 03739025-9026 Arbitrator Bars General No-Smoking Rule
- 03739027-9054 in the Matter of Arbitration Between Schien Body & Equipment Co., Inc. And United Steelworkers of America, Local Union No. 8557 Fmcs No. 77k17279 No Smoking Rule Grievance No. 77-1 Decision of Arbitrator
- 03739057-9058 Alexandria Smoke Eaters Can't
- 03739059
- 03739062 Lighting A Fire Under Smokers
- 03739063 Lighting Up? Bounced Out
- 03739064
- 03739065 Virginia Town Bars Smokers As Firemen
- 03739066-9067
- 03739068-9069
- 03739071-9072
- 03739073
- 03739074
- 03739080 Federal Judge Cites the Constitution in Refusing Smoking Ban in Public Building
- 03739081 Return to Prohibition: Smokers Arrested, Fined and Jailed in Chicago
- 03739082 Today's Anti-Smoking Prohibitionists Follow Path Blazed by Carry Nation.
- 03739083 Police - Can They Enforce Smoking Prohibition Laws?
- 03739084-9085 Lawmakers Balk at Excessive Smoking Bans,
- 03739086
- 03739087-9091 Kentucky Department of Labor Occupational Health Newsletter
- 03739092-9093
- 03739094-9095
- 03739096-9098 Dining Out: Should Smokers Be Segregated?
- 03739099-9100 Second-Hand Smoke - Is It Harmful?
- 03739101
- 03739102-9103
- 03739104 Smoking Ruling Irks Gasp
- 03739105
- 03739106 A Puff for Duffy
- 03739107 Judge Nixes Nonsmokers' Court Suit
- 03739108 A Smoking Issue Ignites
- 03739109 Pipe Smoker Is Assaulted; Man, 62, Is Arrested
- 03739110 2 'no Smoking' Cases Doused
- 03739111-9112 Members of Gasp Make Citizens' Arrests of Smokers in Orange County
- 03739113-9114 Two-Year-Old Smoking Ban Works - Even If It Is Unenforceable
- 03739115 His $100 Goes Up in Smoke
- 03739116 No Smoking
- 03739117 the Smoker in Elevator Case
- 03739118 Did Smoke Get in the Eyes of Justice?
- 03739119 Chicago Court's A Drag for Subway Smokers
- 03739120 Smoking Wasn't Worth It
- 03739121-9122 Smokers Facing More Restraints, Stiffer Penalties
- 03739123 Give That Man A Big Cigar?
- 03739124 Slavney's Stogie Gets A Grievance
- 03739125 Lights Out From Court, Complicates His Problem
- 03739126 Smokers Court Gets Tough
- 03739127 No Writing on the Wall Puts Legal Smoke in Their Eyes
- 03739128 City Smoking Ordinance Ruled Valid, Trial Is Set
- 03739129 Fired Up, Newsman Smokes Out Co-Worker
- 03739130 First Person Tried Under No-Smoking Law Acquitted
- 03739131 74 Held in Violation of New Smoking Law
- 03739132 the Case Hinged on Fire
- 03739133 Smokers on Bus Are Sentenced
- 03739134 City's No-Smoking Law Gets Court Test
- 03739135 Dup of Id 03739128
- 03739136-9137 Judge Chides Nations Conscience in Beach Smoking Verdict
- 03739138-9140 All Aboard for Chicago's Costliest Puff
- 03739141 Smoker Meets His Match in Court
- 03739142 Cigaret on An Elevator Costs Him $250 Fine
- 03739143 Smoking Landmark Case
- 03739144 Lack of Respect for Laws May Be Test Case
- 03739145 Nabbing Smokers Is Easy As Netting Smoke
- 03739146-9147 Gasp Still on War Path Even After Losing Case
- 03739148
- 03739149-9150 Newsletter
- 03739151
- 03739152-9153 They Fume About Smokers
- 03739154-9155
- 03739156-9157
- 03739158
- 03739159-9160 No-Smoke Break
- 03739161
- 03739162 Is Tobacco Smoke A Aealth Hazard to Nonsmokers?
- 03739163
- 03739164-9165
- 03739166 Smoke Billows From City Ordfnance Hearing
- 03739167
- 03739168-9179 States' Statutes Regulating Smoking in Public Places
Related Documents:
Document Images
4
'Smo.fzing Restrictions
A re Proving Popular
~:'B ut Ha rd to Enforce
C
By SHAWN KENNEDY
The rising aggressiveness of the non-
=amnker, abetted in part by evidence that
.other people's furning tobacco holds the
potential for harm, ha3 reached the point
" that 33 states and many more cities and
counties,have adopted some form of re-
:" ttrictions on smqjU&jp,~public places.
~ wAe'!!f"fltg''t~3tes ar,Zlroader than
f>~ Federcal 1 l§
l,~t,i"~tlPat started it all,
' an~"StFiei°s are just so much legalistic
flab. But whatever the scope of the laws,
there Is agreement among concerned indi-
s viduals as well as antismoking groups
that enforoing the statutes Is almost im-
possible, that compliance, then, is mostly
a matter of public cooperation and that
~ even if the laws are weak public support
for them is growing by the day.
While the American Cancer Society is
' pleading with smokers to "quit for your
own sake," sponsoring the "Great Ameri-
' can Smoke-Out" today as the latest event
In the society's 25-year crusade against
smoking, nonsmokers are becoming less
timid about saying, in effect, "Smoke if
you want, but not around me."
Medical evidence that the toxic sub-
stances produced by tobacco can affect
nonsmokers under certain conditions led
to Federal restrictions on smoking in pub-
lic areas. In 1973, with Arizona first,
;ttatei and localities began following until
today there Is an array of statutes that
Continued on Page B13. Column 1
N, T.C. NOTrrtOLbERt: Jule af In a trllrte t. Juk
farCer, whn lxot CUy 11aIt on propo+ed 3-7rar moratorlum.
C)ly 1?a1I, Frt., Nor. 1lI, 1p:30 A,M ; no Tund tntdng. Ad
Hoc Commtt'ro to honor Drr. FutKr-B9B-4093.-Advt,
t - -- .,--__.,_~+...........a~r........+..+~- --- - - i._..i.~
C
.

.
~
Curbs on Public S
Popular but Ar
.
.
Continued From Page Alta11 ~ ort of the Federal model or go well
oc d it.
be}
1
But wr et.het statutes are broad or tmit-
ed, Wa;ter Simek, the fire marshal in St.
cho the words
ed to
N
i
l
moking Prove
e Hard to Enforce
illion smokers have not been nearly
53
m
so zealous as nonsmokers. An organiza-
tion calling itself C.LG.A.R.S. (the acro-
~nym, which stands for Com
' mittee Insur-
nn., seem
e
;
I
Pau
C
ing and Guaranteeing Anyones Right to
Smoke, also reflects the group's sponsor-
hip-the Consolidated Cigar Corporation
held an organizational meeting in New
! of otcers who are supposed to see tha~ York City in June 1976 and has not met
"
1 the iaas are carried out:
Enforcement-I since.
i rd sa'~ it's impcssible."
; L'sPerkeiey, Calif., where the ordinance
I proci=:^g for a£50 fine has been in effect
But in Lubbock, Tex., Judle and Rick
Arnold six months ago organized
P.U.F.F., an acronym for People United
. mnce Juty, it is tne responsibihty of both I to Fight Fanatics. The group has 500
: the Pci:ce and Health Departmects to en- i members nationwide and a representative
force the law. So far there have been I in Washington to keep them informed
r no more than a handful of arrests. of proposed legislation regarding bans on
il 'Trre major problem is that there Is~smoking and such diverse other matters
no way the police could ever find every- I as the 55-mile-an-hour speed limit. The
-e who is vtoiatir.g the ordinance," satd , group, whose founders do not smoke, ex-
t an
!"}lere ce Stroud, the Heal h Depattment pects to be expanding its membership and
= director. - publishing a newsletter soon. /
be'kelees Police Captain, Darrell Hlck- Smoken seem to consider from a legal
man. added: "It's sornewhat like someone point of view any lack of action in court
h
t
t
f
us
t
e a
a
- ealit^g about a car biocking a driveway;I cases or any mamtenance o
or
l
- f
by the time the police come the car has + ~e,
Indifferent Lobbyists -
]r'crcement becomes even more erratic
whe_. it is up to restaurant managers,
zetaii store clerks and bus end train
opera-Drs to see that the no-smoking
a!gn9 are observed.
"We don'; have the forces to enforce
this law," said Ken Campbell, director
-..of p.~::ic relations for the Marachusetts
ay Z~nsportation Authority. A state
s:at_e Lprc:~ibits smoking on buses and
~St^a .$. In some cases, Mr. Campbell
yknotei. ii e bus cr train driver stops the
t~enir ~.rtil r~. <.nnkor ennc "aut these
ases Lce rare and at :.he driver's discre-
on.' a
As countervailing lobbyists, the nation's
nLOn matters as a s e
cuo m legis
their position. In New Orleans, for exam-
ple, Judge Jack Gordon of Federal District
Court ruled against a group of nonsmok-
ers who contended that their rights bad
been violated when they were forced to
inhale tobacco smoke while attending
sports and entertainment events in the
New Orleans Super BowL
And more recently the Federal AvlaHon
Commission rejected a move to ban
smoking in the cockpits of commercial
airplanes as well as prohibit pilots from
smoking eight hours before takeoff. The
move, undertaken by Ralph Nader, held
that smoking was particularly dangerous
for the pilots and therefore could jeopard-
ize the safety of the passengers as well.
Ironically, the antismokir.g groups that
fought to get the laws on the books now
~ -
THE NEW YORK TIMES, THURSDAY NOVEMBER 17, 1971
admit that tDs statutes maka ]Ittla differ
eneR - _ L
'They put up a aigtt and a law-abiding
citizen will abide. But there'a no one to
enforce it," said Lok Fundenburg, acting
director of the Lung Association in
Kansas, where smoking is illegal in public
places such as elevators theaters and ii-
braries and carries a 52`5 fine if the per-
son in charge of the building has posted
a no-smoking sign.
Leo C. Kaye, the executive director of
the Alaska Lung Association and of a
local lobby called G.A.S.P. (Group Against
Smokers' Pollution) has felt similar frus
trations but has discove M a way of pres-
suring those responsible for enforcement
When a nonsmoker complains nbout
violations In certain buildings, Mr. Kaye
reminds the people who are responsible
for building maintenance of the law and
he continues to do so until the ordinances
are enforced
Protecting Nonsmokers' 'Rlght.'
"So far the soft approach has worked,°,
ha taid
Betty Carnes, a Scottsdale, Ariz., ornf-'
thologist who joined the crusade against
smoking after watching a 29-year-old
friend die of lung cancer, puts little faith
in either the entismoking ord,nances or
the arrest records of the enforcers.
Int lawa atop abort of banndng smoking
ie grocery stores. Mrs, Carnes'A friend
walked out, leaving a cartful of groceries
in the aisle, when a clerk Ignored her
appeals for he'.p ifn the matter.
qVhen several people ara invo:ved It
Is often peer group pressure that per-
suades a smoker to stub out his cigarette.
A group of patrons at the Hitch Inn
Rail Bar in Afton, Minn., decided to do
soalething about the pipe smoker who
had wandesed into the nonsmoking sec-
tion. After he ignored their requests that
he leave, they promptly hustled him to
the door and threw him out-without
opening it first
While such drastic measures by militant
nonsmokers may be rare, verbal confron-
tations are common nowadays. In the
past nonsmokers may have been embar-
rassed to "make a fuss," but now, said
Douglas Vis.ius: health education director
for Micsigan's Wayne County Health De-
partment, "s:nokers are starting to feel
the pub!ie pressure, to feel mtoking is
sociallv negative behavior." He added,
"hlinety-five percent of them know that
It's not good and when nonsmokers speak
yp'it adds to their smoking problem."
'YThere's been a tremendous turnaround
fn tlte last two years," noted Mary Ann
Mart~a a program associate for the iung
c~ "I don't care how many laws you have, i asbo tion and director of the Assocla-
if you don't have people in the state be- tiap'9or Non-Smokers' Right.s, "Eben
hind the laws the law isn't worth the reaise that there should be a
paper It's written on," said Mrs. Carnes. ha an smokang in aome public-placea.^
The citizenry must support the spirit as crtg of the icsae,' saldMr. Vilni-
we11 as the specifica of the law, Mrs. as, 'k that-anoking san be 3.rmfttl to
Carnes believes, If what she holds to be le for two reasons lyrst the rhildren
the r ghu of nonsmokers are to be pro- in e hames of mtokers ha;e t.cice as
tected. -. -, m - respiratoty Illnnses as vther cfii-
Mrs. Carnes tells the story of a frlend dr and'carboa mnamcfbeSs-Jzarrmihl
wno asked a smoker next to her in a to people with respiratory tdiseases or
"
It tas-oome~down+l~ a
supermarket check-out line to observe a hesit trotrbie.
no-smoking sign. "It's not the law," the I ou4ition of life, but until teerstty.the
amoker responded tersely. Apparently he I s.mbkvbad eontrol tn the mortsiUSat
i was aware that in Arizona the antismok- and the nonsrnoken did not.^a?,y y_1 )
©
