Lorillard
Alexandria Smoke Eaters Can't
Fields
- Author
- Cue, E.
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT FILE ROOM
- Alias
- 03739057/03739058
- Type
- NEWS, NEWSPAPER ARTICLE
- Named Organization
- Alexandria Fire Dept
- American Civil Liberties Union
- Dc Fire Dept
- Fairfax County Fire Dept
- Copied
- Stevens, A.J.
- Named Person
- Davis, P.O.
- Jones, K.
- Rule, C.
- Schroeder, R.E.
- Selden, L.
- Webster, M.
- Document File
- 03738759/03739179/S and H Re Allergic Responses Effect of Smokers on Non-Smokers Vol 1 82-77.
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- Request
- R1-004
- R1-037
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Author (Organization)
- Wa Post
- Site
- N14
- Master ID
- 03738724/9179
- 03738726
- 03738727
- 03738728
- 03738729
- 03738730
- 03738731
- 03738732
- 03738733-8742 Proposed Rule 101-20. 109-10 Regulations of Smoking
- 03738744 Rules Proposed to Curb Smoking in Federal Offices
- 03738745
- 03738746 Smoking Ban Sought
- 03738747-8758 Use of Tobacco Practices, Attitudes, Knowledge, and Beliefs United States - Fall 640000 and Spring 660000
- 03738759 S&H Re: Allergic Responses - Effect of Smokers on Non-Smokers Volume I - 770000 - 820000
- 03738760 Prior Correspondence to 770000 Has Been Destroyed, As Authorized by Mr. A.J. Stevens.
- 03738761 Effect of Smoke on Nonsmoker
- 03738764
- 03738765
- 03738766-8767 San Mateo County Firefighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo Defendants and Respondents Order to Show Cause in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 288890
- 03738768-8779 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo, Et Al., Defendants and Respondents. Declaration of Leo C. Middendorf in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 288890 Exhibit B Employment Requirements - Physical Standards, No-Smoking Clause
- 03738769-8771 Exhibit D
- 03738772-8773 Exhibit E
- 03738774 Exhibit F
- 03738775 Exhibit C
- 03738776 Exhibit B Employment Requirements - Physical Standa Rds, No-Smoking Clause
- 03738780-8786 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo, Et Al., Defendants and Respondents. Declaration of John Mollinelli Jr. In the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 268890
- 03738782 Exhibit G
- 03738783 Exhibit H
- 03738784 Exhibit I Nepotism
- 03738785 Exhibit J
- 03738786 Proof of Service by Mail
- 03738787-8820 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners, Vs. City of San Mateo, Defendants and Respondents. Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief and for Writ of Mandate and Declaratory Relief in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo
- 03738821-8839 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo, Defendants and Respondents. Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief Petition for Writ of Mandate in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 268890
- 03738837 Verification
- 03738838-8839 Exhibit 'a' Employment Agreement
- 03738840-8841 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03738842 Memorandum to the Committee of Counsel
- 03738843-8860 Irene C. Parodi Petitioner, US. Merit Systems Protection Board and Office of Personnel Management Respondents Opinion Appeal From the Merit Systems Protection Board Argued: 820210 Submitted 820413 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Mspb No. Sf 83i Lo9012 No. 80-7671
- 03738862
- 03738863-8864 Ashrae Seeks More Ventilation in Comm. Bldgs.
- 03738865
- 03738868-8872 Mind If I Smoke?
- 03738873-8876 The Perils of Second-Hand Smoking
- 03738883-8884
- 03738885
- 03738886-8887 He Wants Cigarette and Choice of Seat
- 03738889
- 03738890-8891
- 03738892-8893
- 03738894-8895
- 03738896
- 03738897
- 03738898
- 03738899
- 03738900
- 03738901-8902
- 03738903
- 03738904-8905 TI Newletter
- 03738906-8914 Smoking in the Workplace
- 03738915-8916
- 03738917-8920 Greater Rockford Food Service, Etc., Plaintiff, Vs Joseph Orthoefer, Etc, Et Al, Defendants. Memorandum of Decision State of Illinois in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit County of Winnebago No.76-2447
- 03738921-8922 Greater Rockford Food Service Plaintiff, A Chapter of the Chicago and Illinois Restaurant Association, A Not-for-Profit Corporation, Plaintiff, and City of Rockford, A Municipal Corporation, Intervening Petitioner, Vs. Joseph Orthoefer, Administrator of the Winnebago County Health Department, Et Al., Defendant. Judgement Order State of Illinois in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit County of Winnebago in Chancery No. 76-2447
- 03738923
- 03738924-8925 If You're Hooked on Gigarettes, Read on
- 03738926
- 03738927
- 03738928
- 03738929-8932 Business Smoking Survey
- 03738933
- 03738934-8935 Smoking in Public Places ... Professors Disagree
- 03738936
- 03738937
- 03738938-8939 Statement of the Pennsylvania Tavern Association with Respect to Smoking Ordinances and Laws.
- 03738940-8941 Nonsmokers Try to Clear the Air
- 03738942-8943
- 03738944
- 03738945-8947 A Smoker's Lament
- 03738948
- 03738949-8950
- 03738951
- 03738953 Matter in Dispute Between Cala Foods. Inc, and Retail Clerks Union Local 648 Involving the Discharge of Jack Hamm
- 03738954-8975 in the Matter of Arbitration Between Cala Foods, Inc. And Retail Clerks Union Local 648 Concerning the Termination of Jack W. Hamm Opinion and Award of John Phillip Linn
- 03738976
- 03738977 Experts Defend Public Smoking
- 03738978-8979 Panel Told Smoking Not Hurting Non-Smokers
- 03738980-8981 Conclusion of Mcaward Case in East Boston District Court Involving A Non-Smoking Passenger on Board American Airlines Flight, Boston Logan Airport, 780515
- 03738982-8984 the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Vs. John Mcaward, East Boston District Court, East Boston, Massachusetts, 780711
- 03738985-8986
- 03738987-8988 Cigarette Smoking the Facts About Your Lungs
- 03738989-8990 Companies Put Up the 'No-Smoking Sign
- 03738991
- 03738992 Smoking Limits Aim of Director of Health Agency
- 03738993-8994 Winnebago County Smoking Ordinance
- 03738995-8998 Winnebago County Smoking Ordinance
- 03738999-9001 Ordinance
- 03739003
- 03739004-9006 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, V. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Complaint State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75ws4270
- 03739007-9009 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, Vs. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Answer State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739010-9012 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, Vs. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Amended Complaint State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739013-9016 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, Vs. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Answer to Amended Complaint State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739017-9019 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, US. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Order State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739020-9021 Wm. T. Mccracken Vs. O.B. Sloan Plaintiff's Document List North Carolina Mecklenburg County in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739022-9023 Effect of Smoke on Non Smokers
- 03739025-9026 Arbitrator Bars General No-Smoking Rule
- 03739027-9054 in the Matter of Arbitration Between Schien Body & Equipment Co., Inc. And United Steelworkers of America, Local Union No. 8557 Fmcs No. 77k17279 No Smoking Rule Grievance No. 77-1 Decision of Arbitrator
- 03739059
- 03739062 Lighting A Fire Under Smokers
- 03739063 Lighting Up? Bounced Out
- 03739064
- 03739065 Virginia Town Bars Smokers As Firemen
- 03739066-9067
- 03739068-9069
- 03739071-9072
- 03739073
- 03739074
- 03739075-9076 Smoking Restrictions Are Proving Popular But Hard to Enforce
- 03739080 Federal Judge Cites the Constitution in Refusing Smoking Ban in Public Building
- 03739081 Return to Prohibition: Smokers Arrested, Fined and Jailed in Chicago
- 03739082 Today's Anti-Smoking Prohibitionists Follow Path Blazed by Carry Nation.
- 03739083 Police - Can They Enforce Smoking Prohibition Laws?
- 03739084-9085 Lawmakers Balk at Excessive Smoking Bans,
- 03739086
- 03739087-9091 Kentucky Department of Labor Occupational Health Newsletter
- 03739092-9093
- 03739094-9095
- 03739096-9098 Dining Out: Should Smokers Be Segregated?
- 03739099-9100 Second-Hand Smoke - Is It Harmful?
- 03739101
- 03739102-9103
- 03739104 Smoking Ruling Irks Gasp
- 03739105
- 03739106 A Puff for Duffy
- 03739107 Judge Nixes Nonsmokers' Court Suit
- 03739108 A Smoking Issue Ignites
- 03739109 Pipe Smoker Is Assaulted; Man, 62, Is Arrested
- 03739110 2 'no Smoking' Cases Doused
- 03739111-9112 Members of Gasp Make Citizens' Arrests of Smokers in Orange County
- 03739113-9114 Two-Year-Old Smoking Ban Works - Even If It Is Unenforceable
- 03739115 His $100 Goes Up in Smoke
- 03739116 No Smoking
- 03739117 the Smoker in Elevator Case
- 03739118 Did Smoke Get in the Eyes of Justice?
- 03739119 Chicago Court's A Drag for Subway Smokers
- 03739120 Smoking Wasn't Worth It
- 03739121-9122 Smokers Facing More Restraints, Stiffer Penalties
- 03739123 Give That Man A Big Cigar?
- 03739124 Slavney's Stogie Gets A Grievance
- 03739125 Lights Out From Court, Complicates His Problem
- 03739126 Smokers Court Gets Tough
- 03739127 No Writing on the Wall Puts Legal Smoke in Their Eyes
- 03739128 City Smoking Ordinance Ruled Valid, Trial Is Set
- 03739129 Fired Up, Newsman Smokes Out Co-Worker
- 03739130 First Person Tried Under No-Smoking Law Acquitted
- 03739131 74 Held in Violation of New Smoking Law
- 03739132 the Case Hinged on Fire
- 03739133 Smokers on Bus Are Sentenced
- 03739134 City's No-Smoking Law Gets Court Test
- 03739135 Dup of Id 03739128
- 03739136-9137 Judge Chides Nations Conscience in Beach Smoking Verdict
- 03739138-9140 All Aboard for Chicago's Costliest Puff
- 03739141 Smoker Meets His Match in Court
- 03739142 Cigaret on An Elevator Costs Him $250 Fine
- 03739143 Smoking Landmark Case
- 03739144 Lack of Respect for Laws May Be Test Case
- 03739145 Nabbing Smokers Is Easy As Netting Smoke
- 03739146-9147 Gasp Still on War Path Even After Losing Case
- 03739148
- 03739149-9150 Newsletter
- 03739151
- 03739152-9153 They Fume About Smokers
- 03739154-9155
- 03739156-9157
- 03739158
- 03739159-9160 No-Smoke Break
- 03739161
- 03739162 Is Tobacco Smoke A Aealth Hazard to Nonsmokers?
- 03739163
- 03739164-9165
- 03739166 Smoke Billows From City Ordfnance Hearing
- 03739167
- 03739168-9179 States' Statutes Regulating Smoking in Public Places
Related Documents:
Document Images
,
t W .~ Ll2J L Lt~~~ . "~ ~~: ~'~.~e ~~R 1~
1 ~: n..~a W t:/
:
By Eduardo Cue
R-asl:: _: on Post Y:riter .
Smokers who .~: ould like to join the Alexandria
Fire Dcparttnent as fire faghters had better
make a\en Year's resolut:ca to quit puffing.
The departm.ent, in a re-.llatiou that may be
the first of its ki:<d in the r.ation, is requiring-
as a condition of emplo,-:r:cnt that new fire
fighters sign papers plc,_!.in3 they willl not
smoke on or off duty. -
Alexandria Fire Chief Charles Rule eeplained
that under Vir.-inia's Hear: and Lung Act fire
tual suicidall death," Chief Rule said yesterday.
The chief emphasized that he is not trying to
impose his personal beliefs on am one--hc was
a pipe smoker for 23 ycars until he c;u'st last July.
He and other Alexandria of:`iciat; Eaid they were
trying to protect the firefi,;hter' health and save
-the city money.
Alexandria personnel director poife E. Sc hroe-
der said that in the last three years the majority
of disability cases in the'city h_%-e becn due to
heart and lung diseases and tia: this hcs cost
the city an additional $1N,C00 in pension ber.ef:ts.
fighters who suffer from pulmonary diseascs or Spokesman for the Fairfax County and District
heart attack are presumed to be incapaciated 'of Columbia fire departments sa:3 yesterday their
as a result of their job and can thus retire with
an extra large pension.
"It's a known fact that s-nokino is hazardous
to your health, so why shoa'd we subsidize the
deterioration of the heart and lun.'s and even-
departments were studying the Alexandria reg-
ulation with an eye to impleir.ent?n.a a similar
rule. But .lIontoomery and Prince Gcorgcs County
-see S3IOI:ERS, E?, Col. 3
o I
~ ~-rr 1 ~~ a [~~~ ' l J
1 ~J 1~1`~ 1 'V~~1'G`l1'J v! QJ ~' ~J li
S-M0,:L1:S, Fro.n E1
fire officials said '-hey had no plans
to impose such re>=ictions.
. Sgt. Kenneth Jones of the Fairfax
County Fire Dep ~-t.^.icnt said he re-
cently completed a renort on the de-
partment's physical fitness Y-ogam
and added that aa Alesancy:a-style
smoking ban is "under consc :ction
and review."
~
Alexandria's Ci:ief Rule said this
was an anpropria'e time to :__ue the
smoking regulatioz because the dc-
partmer.t has bce7: in the prccess of
revic,.cin~ its mcdical stanc':ar;_ and is
in the process of hirino 12 new fire
fi;hters. The ch'.e: said 10 fire
fighters had b^~un v:orl: on `.:~,nday
and all had a_rc~d to si^z t`~ _;apcrs
stating t'.:,~y %,.ou'.d not s:-:o?:e.
Of the 10, ho.:e:er, onl:: '.':cltael
Webster, 22, was a s:no'.-:er. 1: eSster
said yesterdny that he had to
beconce a fire fi ::,er since he v.as 10
years o'.d and did not mind up
smo.l-in.- to achie:e his goal. He said
he snlol:^ I a p: r=: of ci~arc'-tcs a day
w
before lie quit Nov. 30 and had often
tried to quit smolcing before.
"It's, ooino pretty oood," he said of
his latest attempt. "I haven't touched
a cioarctte yet. Ciose, but not yet," he
added. -
Webster said he docs not believe
the fire department is infringing on
his personal rights by forbidding him
to smoke, but he also admitted that if
he nared to he could probably det,
away with smoking off duty. "
The - constitutionality of the new
re,,u'.atioz is uppermost on the minds
of Alesanur ia officials, but they say
they are confident that the rule.rould
«-ithsta::d a court test. Asked what
cons:itutional problems he fores~.S,
personnel director Scnroc-ler replied:
"I'm not sure that thcre are an~. 1'.'e
place a11 kinds of conditions on pcon:c
in terms of employment." Srhroc('.cr
explained that Alexandria has weight
requil-etaent for all fulitime city e:n-
ployces. ~~0G1,UEo
Lawrence Sc-lden, cltairnnan of the
board of the Northern V~r_i::i1 c'.:ap-
,
w
ter of the American Civil Liberties
Union, said lie v:as 'shocled" by the
smo:-;no prohibi:ion durin., off duty
hours, but added that he %': ou'.d have
to study the iss.:e carefuliy before
mafiing a judgment as to its constitu-
tionaiity. ~ _
Chief Rule said the smo:;ers ban
ca:r.e about as a result of co nsulta-
tions with Dr. Paul 0. Da:is, who
heads a private consulting firm on the
physical fitness of public sa:ety em-
plo.-ces and v:ho helped de:e'.oo the
Alexandria department's f;tncss pro-
gram. -
Davis said Iaboratory tes'-s show
conr..ai%cly that the on-t.`.e-;ob per-
for.;nrince of firef?^hters w:io smoke
fails to mcasurc up to the pe.formance
of r.en-stno~crs. Furthcr;::nr?, Da~-is
said, fu'.ly h:ilf of the fircf:_`'crs who
die on the job c::~ of heart a't icks.
Davis has fi;;urcs Fi:o«ing
that t'.e dirert cc.st to a ci:y for one
..c firc.i;htcr ,:'..o retires ~<<.,use of
heart or lult; d`.,case is ;"-",0.000 a
y ca r,
r
r
! .
.
191
I

03739058
