Lorillard
Companies Put Up the 'No-Smoking Sign
Fields
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT FILE ROOM
- Type
- NEWS, NEWSPAPER ARTICLE
- Site
- N14
- Copied
- Judge, C.H.
- Spears, A.W.
- Stevens, A.J.
- Spears, A.W.
- Request
- R2-001
- Named Person
- Bell, J.
- Brause, A.
- Brown, D.H.
- Dooling, M.W.
- Gregory, D.C.
- Hempel, G.
- Kadish, E.
- Loveday, P.L.
- Miller, J.
- Nethercutt, J.B.
- Smith, J.R.
- Brause, A.
- Document File
- 03738759/03739179/S and H Re Allergic Responses Effect of Smokers on Non-Smokers Vol 1 82-77.
- Date Loaded
- 01 Mar 2000
- Characteristic
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- Litigation
- Fali/Produced
- Named Organization
- Aluminair Standard Glass
- Bonne Bell Cosmetics
- Ca Clean Indoor Air Comm
- Crown Insurance Services
- Cybertek Computer Products
- Dartnell Inst of Business Research
- General Foods
- Group Against Smoking Pollution
- Intermatic
- Johns Manville
- Merle Norman Cosmetics
- Natl Interagency Council on Smoking
- Neon Electric
- Norweco
- Sears Roebuck
- Speedcall
- United Steelworkers Local 12282
- Bonne Bell Cosmetics
- Master ID
- 03738724/9179
Related Documents:- 03738726
- 03738727
- 03738728
- 03738729
- 03738730
- 03738731
- 03738732
- 03738733-8742 Proposed Rule 101-20. 109-10 Regulations of Smoking
- 03738744 Rules Proposed to Curb Smoking in Federal Offices
- 03738745
- 03738746 Smoking Ban Sought
- 03738747-8758 Use of Tobacco Practices, Attitudes, Knowledge, and Beliefs United States - Fall 640000 and Spring 660000
- 03738759 S&H Re: Allergic Responses - Effect of Smokers on Non-Smokers Volume I - 770000 - 820000
- 03738760 Prior Correspondence to 770000 Has Been Destroyed, As Authorized by Mr. A.J. Stevens.
- 03738761 Effect of Smoke on Nonsmoker
- 03738764
- 03738765
- 03738766-8767 San Mateo County Firefighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo Defendants and Respondents Order to Show Cause in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 288890
- 03738768-8779 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo, Et Al., Defendants and Respondents. Declaration of Leo C. Middendorf in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 288890 Exhibit B Employment Requirements - Physical Standards, No-Smoking Clause
- 03738769-8771 Exhibit D
- 03738772-8773 Exhibit E
- 03738774 Exhibit F
- 03738775 Exhibit C
- 03738776 Exhibit B Employment Requirements - Physical Standa Rds, No-Smoking Clause
- 03738780-8786 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo, Et Al., Defendants and Respondents. Declaration of John Mollinelli Jr. In the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 268890
- 03738782 Exhibit G
- 03738783 Exhibit H
- 03738784 Exhibit I Nepotism
- 03738785 Exhibit J
- 03738786 Proof of Service by Mail
- 03738787-8820 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners, Vs. City of San Mateo, Defendants and Respondents. Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief and for Writ of Mandate and Declaratory Relief in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo
- 03738821-8839 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo, Defendants and Respondents. Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief Petition for Writ of Mandate in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 268890
- 03738837 Verification
- 03738838-8839 Exhibit 'a' Employment Agreement
- 03738840-8841 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03738842 Memorandum to the Committee of Counsel
- 03738843-8860 Irene C. Parodi Petitioner, US. Merit Systems Protection Board and Office of Personnel Management Respondents Opinion Appeal From the Merit Systems Protection Board Argued: 820210 Submitted 820413 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Mspb No. Sf 83i Lo9012 No. 80-7671
- 03738862
- 03738863-8864 Ashrae Seeks More Ventilation in Comm. Bldgs.
- 03738865
- 03738868-8872 Mind If I Smoke?
- 03738873-8876 The Perils of Second-Hand Smoking
- 03738883-8884
- 03738885
- 03738886-8887 He Wants Cigarette and Choice of Seat
- 03738889
- 03738890-8891
- 03738892-8893
- 03738894-8895
- 03738896
- 03738897
- 03738898
- 03738899
- 03738900
- 03738901-8902
- 03738903
- 03738904-8905 TI Newletter
- 03738906-8914 Smoking in the Workplace
- 03738915-8916
- 03738917-8920 Greater Rockford Food Service, Etc., Plaintiff, Vs Joseph Orthoefer, Etc, Et Al, Defendants. Memorandum of Decision State of Illinois in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit County of Winnebago No.76-2447
- 03738921-8922 Greater Rockford Food Service Plaintiff, A Chapter of the Chicago and Illinois Restaurant Association, A Not-for-Profit Corporation, Plaintiff, and City of Rockford, A Municipal Corporation, Intervening Petitioner, Vs. Joseph Orthoefer, Administrator of the Winnebago County Health Department, Et Al., Defendant. Judgement Order State of Illinois in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit County of Winnebago in Chancery No. 76-2447
- 03738923
- 03738924-8925 If You're Hooked on Gigarettes, Read on
- 03738926
- 03738927
- 03738928
- 03738929-8932 Business Smoking Survey
- 03738933
- 03738934-8935 Smoking in Public Places ... Professors Disagree
- 03738936
- 03738937
- 03738938-8939 Statement of the Pennsylvania Tavern Association with Respect to Smoking Ordinances and Laws.
- 03738940-8941 Nonsmokers Try to Clear the Air
- 03738942-8943
- 03738944
- 03738945-8947 A Smoker's Lament
- 03738948
- 03738949-8950
- 03738951
- 03738953 Matter in Dispute Between Cala Foods. Inc, and Retail Clerks Union Local 648 Involving the Discharge of Jack Hamm
- 03738954-8975 in the Matter of Arbitration Between Cala Foods, Inc. And Retail Clerks Union Local 648 Concerning the Termination of Jack W. Hamm Opinion and Award of John Phillip Linn
- 03738976
- 03738977 Experts Defend Public Smoking
- 03738978-8979 Panel Told Smoking Not Hurting Non-Smokers
- 03738980-8981 Conclusion of Mcaward Case in East Boston District Court Involving A Non-Smoking Passenger on Board American Airlines Flight, Boston Logan Airport, 780515
- 03738982-8984 the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Vs. John Mcaward, East Boston District Court, East Boston, Massachusetts, 780711
- 03738985-8986
- 03738987-8988 Cigarette Smoking the Facts About Your Lungs
- 03738991
- 03738992 Smoking Limits Aim of Director of Health Agency
- 03738993-8994 Winnebago County Smoking Ordinance
- 03738995-8998 Winnebago County Smoking Ordinance
- 03738999-9001 Ordinance
- 03739003
- 03739004-9006 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, V. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Complaint State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75ws4270
- 03739007-9009 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, Vs. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Answer State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739010-9012 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, Vs. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Amended Complaint State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739013-9016 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, Vs. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Answer to Amended Complaint State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739017-9019 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, US. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Order State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739020-9021 Wm. T. Mccracken Vs. O.B. Sloan Plaintiff's Document List North Carolina Mecklenburg County in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739022-9023 Effect of Smoke on Non Smokers
- 03739025-9026 Arbitrator Bars General No-Smoking Rule
- 03739027-9054 in the Matter of Arbitration Between Schien Body & Equipment Co., Inc. And United Steelworkers of America, Local Union No. 8557 Fmcs No. 77k17279 No Smoking Rule Grievance No. 77-1 Decision of Arbitrator
- 03739057-9058 Alexandria Smoke Eaters Can't
- 03739059
- 03739062 Lighting A Fire Under Smokers
- 03739063 Lighting Up? Bounced Out
- 03739064
- 03739065 Virginia Town Bars Smokers As Firemen
- 03739066-9067
- 03739068-9069
- 03739071-9072
- 03739073
- 03739074
- 03739075-9076 Smoking Restrictions Are Proving Popular But Hard to Enforce
- 03739080 Federal Judge Cites the Constitution in Refusing Smoking Ban in Public Building
- 03739081 Return to Prohibition: Smokers Arrested, Fined and Jailed in Chicago
- 03739082 Today's Anti-Smoking Prohibitionists Follow Path Blazed by Carry Nation.
- 03739083 Police - Can They Enforce Smoking Prohibition Laws?
- 03739084-9085 Lawmakers Balk at Excessive Smoking Bans,
- 03739086
- 03739087-9091 Kentucky Department of Labor Occupational Health Newsletter
- 03739092-9093
- 03739094-9095
- 03739096-9098 Dining Out: Should Smokers Be Segregated?
- 03739099-9100 Second-Hand Smoke - Is It Harmful?
- 03739101
- 03739102-9103
- 03739104 Smoking Ruling Irks Gasp
- 03739105
- 03739106 A Puff for Duffy
- 03739107 Judge Nixes Nonsmokers' Court Suit
- 03739108 A Smoking Issue Ignites
- 03739109 Pipe Smoker Is Assaulted; Man, 62, Is Arrested
- 03739110 2 'no Smoking' Cases Doused
- 03739111-9112 Members of Gasp Make Citizens' Arrests of Smokers in Orange County
- 03739113-9114 Two-Year-Old Smoking Ban Works - Even If It Is Unenforceable
- 03739115 His $100 Goes Up in Smoke
- 03739116 No Smoking
- 03739117 the Smoker in Elevator Case
- 03739118 Did Smoke Get in the Eyes of Justice?
- 03739119 Chicago Court's A Drag for Subway Smokers
- 03739120 Smoking Wasn't Worth It
- 03739121-9122 Smokers Facing More Restraints, Stiffer Penalties
- 03739123 Give That Man A Big Cigar?
- 03739124 Slavney's Stogie Gets A Grievance
- 03739125 Lights Out From Court, Complicates His Problem
- 03739126 Smokers Court Gets Tough
- 03739127 No Writing on the Wall Puts Legal Smoke in Their Eyes
- 03739128 City Smoking Ordinance Ruled Valid, Trial Is Set
- 03739129 Fired Up, Newsman Smokes Out Co-Worker
- 03739130 First Person Tried Under No-Smoking Law Acquitted
- 03739131 74 Held in Violation of New Smoking Law
- 03739132 the Case Hinged on Fire
- 03739133 Smokers on Bus Are Sentenced
- 03739134 City's No-Smoking Law Gets Court Test
- 03739135 Dup of Id 03739128
- 03739136-9137 Judge Chides Nations Conscience in Beach Smoking Verdict
- 03739138-9140 All Aboard for Chicago's Costliest Puff
- 03739141 Smoker Meets His Match in Court
- 03739142 Cigaret on An Elevator Costs Him $250 Fine
- 03739143 Smoking Landmark Case
- 03739144 Lack of Respect for Laws May Be Test Case
- 03739145 Nabbing Smokers Is Easy As Netting Smoke
- 03739146-9147 Gasp Still on War Path Even After Losing Case
- 03739148
- 03739149-9150 Newsletter
- 03739151
- 03739152-9153 They Fume About Smokers
- 03739154-9155
- 03739156-9157
- 03739158
- 03739159-9160 No-Smoke Break
- 03739161
- 03739162 Is Tobacco Smoke A Aealth Hazard to Nonsmokers?
- 03739163
- 03739164-9165
- 03739166 Smoke Billows From City Ordfnance Hearing
- 03739167
- 03739168-9179 States' Statutes Regulating Smoking in Public Places
- Author (Organization)
- Business Week
- UCSF Legacy ID
- tml13c00
Document Images
03738990
~
u
c
N t_
cn -
C

SOCIAL ISSUES
Companies put up the `no-smoking' sign ~t-e-s"d
sl
Growing numbers of cnmpanirs are
payinq lheir workers to stop smoking on
the job-at least 3% of all U. S, compa-
nies and fi% of Canadian mmpanies.
scmrdinp to the Dartnell Institute of
Business Rescarch in Chicapo. Their
rationalc: Smoklnp is not only physically
unhcalthr for the.vorkcs hut eonomh
cally unhealthy for the enmpanies-
CuttinR dm.n on smokir.p "hovtv
prodnctivily, imprnves worker morale,
reduces fires, lowers maintenance and
cleanup costs, and cuts ahsentee{sm;'
sny's James R. Smith, directar of
research and educatienal pro¢rams for
the Group Against Smoking Pollution
(ansr) in BerkeleS. Calif. Moreoveq an
insurance agency has offered Gardiner
Ilempel, preslJrnt of Speedcall C,urp, in
Hayward, Calif., a 5' rate reduetion an
his employec hcalth care uP,crape since
Sperd<all's bonus plan went into efrect
in 1n7,.
"Thc lungcin<cr rate of smokers is
six times as high zs for nonsmnkers;'
says Michael W. Dmtlinq, president of
Crmen Insoian<e Srrvices in San Rafae l,
CaliL, the apency that mzde the offer.
"The fiavre has prow n to a point where
,e simply can no Innger i4 nre iC"
rmmeeiate rewards. The ~.idespresd
use-and suaess-nf the financial in-
~
Y
y
t
,
SpeeCCell employee..eceive a $1 bonus lo, each week
they no not smoke. Last year the payaut'rvzs $9,8268
formed smokers get a Soc-amhuur r
ed
after six puli-free months. Bvt Spe e
call's 36 workers can ~lip on and off the
centives nisas an inescapable question, wagon, receiriug $7for a nunsmnking
Why should lifelonp smokers be willing ' week even if lhey failed to quallfy the
to quit for what amounts to coqwrale
brihrq when they did not quit for the
sxke of their health' The answer
appcars to lie in the immediacy of the
reaard. "Dollars in your porket are
apparently m re of an immediate con-
cern than thinking about qettinp car.cer
20 years dowvn the line;" says Paul L.
f.nveday, campai¢n director of Califor-
nia's Clean Indoor Air Committee.
'Tloney talks;- s'rys Adrienne Brause of
the Ne.+York City-based National
lnteragency Council nn Smoking &
Ilealth. "Its whal wc all react to."
hloncy seems to IM talkln¢ to smokers
roast Lm mnsL Cylrrtek Cmnpnter Prnl-
ucLr Inc., a loa Angcles soflware houce,
offers its ldU U.S. empleyees a$500
"health lnnus' to quiL smoking for a
yrar. So far, 32 rvnrkrrs haie collected.
At Inlermatm Inc, in Spring Lrnve, III.,
President James Miller "heF' his 900
emplayres up to 7100 apiece that they
could not slo} oR the weed for a year. Of
64 takors, 25 wnn thc het plus their
share of an extra $1.000 that Miller had
set asidc to bc divirlcd among the
winnnrs. At Norweroln Spnkane,Wash.,
nnnzmokcrs rollect $10 a month. And at
Ncon Fleclric Ca+rp. in tlouslon, re-
week before. Ifempe.l's payout came to
$9,RY.8 last year.
Many of the Prcgrams use gimmichs
rather than slraightforward bonuses-
For a while, Jess A. Bell, preside.nt of
Bunne Bell Cosmetics Co. in Lzkewoal,
Ohio, paid hea.y smokers on his exeeu-
' tive team to quit-hut required them to
donate the money to charity if they
bnekslid The eaecutives aRreed to stop
smoking for petiods of thres months to a
year, dependinp on their own vie.vs of
their hardihood. Last year, F.ugene
Radish, president of Aluminair Stan-
dnrd Class Co. in Gnllup, N. M., aqrecd
to pay omplopres who swnrr olf lobacro
the amount thcy .vould ha,c spcnt on
ci¢are¢es. The bill cnme Iq $1,440.
Rebele._ Some of the cou.y'e biggest
eompanirs ha" hecome involved in the
camplun, allhnnph zeIdnm on a bonus
bnsis. General Foods Corpp pald head.
quarlers employces i While Plains,
N. Y., part of the cost nf hreek-the-hablt
dossus. The New York City hranch nf
Sears, Roeb,ck & Co. rehatrd the non-
smokiny clinic fee to anc emplm,ee who
remaiced a nonsmoker for elx months-
A few progrsms drsl in penaaics
rzther than rewards. Asbestos producrr
xl.
,l
~
_
Johns-Mavville Carp.. of
~ hittletaa Co'.o., r cenll,y
banned snmkinp ineiL< 14
planls acrnps thu rmmtn'
snd-in whnt is appsrenLly
the firstcorporalr n of
this kir.d-announceJ lhnt
it uould no longer hlre
smokurs for ils R,nCrL
pcrsin work feme in ache;I.os operatlnna. The comVa-
ny cited findin¢, that Imr-
snns who hoin wnrk in
asbestas planL anrl smokr
h.u"e a B2 dnns hiui~cr
chanee o.r yeuiug car.rer
lhan nonsmoking workers
(wha run highur nsk= than
the gencnJ puhliri in any
ca.<1.
'Cold turkey.' l7nion5 harc
already fouµht the pn9ov
at two plantx. At Iknl:on,
Tes., an arbitrator ruled
aCaiust Lrxal 1a09 of thr
Internatiannl Aswciation
of Machiaist., but le liil-
Icrica, Mass., lhe Cnisd
Stcclaorkers' L.raal 122P2
Jo:rns-
u'on a re uest for sn'.oar~e a a,
Aan~ille. said arbl[zator I)a rid H.
Hrown, was "p!acinµ u vl uc restra m
' m 'n
led
lne n rvnus systmn n[ the add m
smuknr. . It is onjcst for Jo'nnw
Manclllr to now say tto uarrrn: ~wrkrrs
who smnkc], `Cnld tnrkuy ar fnrfeit your
joh: "'Che eamp:my, akich loso a
appeal to federal district murt and is
now considerinq further aplwals, says
that smo'uurs do nnt facc inslant dismis-
sal, but Lhat It uill handle each viulation
nn a casa-hy'-casc basis-
Not so nt hledc Nor.van Comtctics in
.
Los Angeles, where Chairman 3 E.
Nethercutt hns ended smokinq every-
where but in the hmch room, distribufd
$10 qoarterly dividcnds for nanv:wkir.p,
and threatened Wc Insunt firing of
violazors- So fnr, only ane of 5011
emplqers haz q~dt r.nher than a rrrpl
thcse lerms. Slrnledl'. Ilcmlad dnr.v
not believe in such draconlan mcasures-
"f don't favor tohd hans;' he say-s.
"Smnkers 2re 0. K. It's just that non-
smnkers are mnro fl. K."
Thcy not only are :nure 0. R; appar-
ently, nunsmnkers aISn rrcelvc nnex-
peeted LencGlc in addltion to monry. A I
Cybcrlsk's le:s Angclcs unit, where 2<I
out of 4.5 employees so .a'<ed, hut only
fouu currontly dn, Ile:ek C. Greqory,
vice-presldent of develupment s _
prnudl;:' "I've cut eigSe minutes oR my
daily 4 hmi. run.
SOCIAL ISSUES
!t 6USINESS WEEN: May 29, 1978
rz
