Lorillard
The Perils of Second-Hand Smoking
Fields
- Author
- Stock, S.
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT FILE ROOM
- Type
- NEWS, NEWSPAPER ARTICLE
- LIST, LIST
- PHOT, PHOTOGRAPH
- LIST, LIST
- Site
- N14
- Request
- R1-265
- Named Person
- Becker, C.
- Bock, F.G.
- Butler, N.R.
- Feyerabend, C.
- Froeb, H.F.
- Goldstein, H.
- Johnson, S.
- Mahler, H.
- Miller, G.H.
- Naeye, R.
- Russell, Mah
- Speer, F.
- Surgeon General
- Sykes, W.
- Tassinari
- White, J.R.
- Bock, F.G.
- Date Loaded
- 15 Mar 2002
- Document File
- 03738759/03739179/S and H Re Allergic Responses Effect of Smokers on Non-Smokers Vol 1 82-77.
- Named Organization
- Bristol Royal Hospital for Sick Chi
- British Medical Journal
- Childrens Mercy Hospital
- Cooperative Group
- Cornell Medical Center
- Edinboro State College
- Freedom Organisation for the Right
- Illustrated London News
- Inst Natl De La Sante Et De La Rech
- Ny Hospital
- Pa State Univ
- Roswell Park Memorial Inst
- Univ of Ca San Diego
- Who, World Health Org
- British Medical Journal
- Litigation
- Feda/Produced
- Author (Organization)
- New Scientist
- Master ID
- 03738724/9179
Related Documents:- 03738726
- 03738727
- 03738728
- 03738729
- 03738730
- 03738731
- 03738732
- 03738733-8742 Proposed Rule 101-20. 109-10 Regulations of Smoking
- 03738744 Rules Proposed to Curb Smoking in Federal Offices
- 03738745
- 03738746 Smoking Ban Sought
- 03738747-8758 Use of Tobacco Practices, Attitudes, Knowledge, and Beliefs United States - Fall 640000 and Spring 660000
- 03738759 S&H Re: Allergic Responses - Effect of Smokers on Non-Smokers Volume I - 770000 - 820000
- 03738760 Prior Correspondence to 770000 Has Been Destroyed, As Authorized by Mr. A.J. Stevens.
- 03738761 Effect of Smoke on Nonsmoker
- 03738764
- 03738765
- 03738766-8767 San Mateo County Firefighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo Defendants and Respondents Order to Show Cause in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 288890
- 03738768-8779 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo, Et Al., Defendants and Respondents. Declaration of Leo C. Middendorf in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 288890 Exhibit B Employment Requirements - Physical Standards, No-Smoking Clause
- 03738769-8771 Exhibit D
- 03738772-8773 Exhibit E
- 03738774 Exhibit F
- 03738775 Exhibit C
- 03738776 Exhibit B Employment Requirements - Physical Standa Rds, No-Smoking Clause
- 03738780-8786 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo, Et Al., Defendants and Respondents. Declaration of John Mollinelli Jr. In the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 268890
- 03738782 Exhibit G
- 03738783 Exhibit H
- 03738784 Exhibit I Nepotism
- 03738785 Exhibit J
- 03738786 Proof of Service by Mail
- 03738787-8820 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners, Vs. City of San Mateo, Defendants and Respondents. Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief and for Writ of Mandate and Declaratory Relief in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo
- 03738821-8839 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo, Defendants and Respondents. Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief Petition for Writ of Mandate in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 268890
- 03738837 Verification
- 03738838-8839 Exhibit 'a' Employment Agreement
- 03738840-8841 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03738842 Memorandum to the Committee of Counsel
- 03738843-8860 Irene C. Parodi Petitioner, US. Merit Systems Protection Board and Office of Personnel Management Respondents Opinion Appeal From the Merit Systems Protection Board Argued: 820210 Submitted 820413 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Mspb No. Sf 83i Lo9012 No. 80-7671
- 03738862
- 03738863-8864 Ashrae Seeks More Ventilation in Comm. Bldgs.
- 03738865
- 03738868-8872 Mind If I Smoke?
- 03738883-8884
- 03738885
- 03738886-8887 He Wants Cigarette and Choice of Seat
- 03738889
- 03738890-8891
- 03738892-8893
- 03738894-8895
- 03738896
- 03738897
- 03738898
- 03738899
- 03738900
- 03738901-8902
- 03738903
- 03738904-8905 TI Newletter
- 03738906-8914 Smoking in the Workplace
- 03738915-8916
- 03738917-8920 Greater Rockford Food Service, Etc., Plaintiff, Vs Joseph Orthoefer, Etc, Et Al, Defendants. Memorandum of Decision State of Illinois in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit County of Winnebago No.76-2447
- 03738921-8922 Greater Rockford Food Service Plaintiff, A Chapter of the Chicago and Illinois Restaurant Association, A Not-for-Profit Corporation, Plaintiff, and City of Rockford, A Municipal Corporation, Intervening Petitioner, Vs. Joseph Orthoefer, Administrator of the Winnebago County Health Department, Et Al., Defendant. Judgement Order State of Illinois in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit County of Winnebago in Chancery No. 76-2447
- 03738923
- 03738924-8925 If You're Hooked on Gigarettes, Read on
- 03738926
- 03738927
- 03738928
- 03738929-8932 Business Smoking Survey
- 03738933
- 03738934-8935 Smoking in Public Places ... Professors Disagree
- 03738936
- 03738937
- 03738938-8939 Statement of the Pennsylvania Tavern Association with Respect to Smoking Ordinances and Laws.
- 03738940-8941 Nonsmokers Try to Clear the Air
- 03738942-8943
- 03738944
- 03738945-8947 A Smoker's Lament
- 03738948
- 03738949-8950
- 03738951
- 03738953 Matter in Dispute Between Cala Foods. Inc, and Retail Clerks Union Local 648 Involving the Discharge of Jack Hamm
- 03738954-8975 in the Matter of Arbitration Between Cala Foods, Inc. And Retail Clerks Union Local 648 Concerning the Termination of Jack W. Hamm Opinion and Award of John Phillip Linn
- 03738976
- 03738977 Experts Defend Public Smoking
- 03738978-8979 Panel Told Smoking Not Hurting Non-Smokers
- 03738980-8981 Conclusion of Mcaward Case in East Boston District Court Involving A Non-Smoking Passenger on Board American Airlines Flight, Boston Logan Airport, 780515
- 03738982-8984 the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Vs. John Mcaward, East Boston District Court, East Boston, Massachusetts, 780711
- 03738985-8986
- 03738987-8988 Cigarette Smoking the Facts About Your Lungs
- 03738989-8990 Companies Put Up the 'No-Smoking Sign
- 03738991
- 03738992 Smoking Limits Aim of Director of Health Agency
- 03738993-8994 Winnebago County Smoking Ordinance
- 03738995-8998 Winnebago County Smoking Ordinance
- 03738999-9001 Ordinance
- 03739003
- 03739004-9006 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, V. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Complaint State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75ws4270
- 03739007-9009 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, Vs. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Answer State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739010-9012 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, Vs. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Amended Complaint State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739013-9016 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, Vs. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Answer to Amended Complaint State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739017-9019 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, US. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Order State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739020-9021 Wm. T. Mccracken Vs. O.B. Sloan Plaintiff's Document List North Carolina Mecklenburg County in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739022-9023 Effect of Smoke on Non Smokers
- 03739025-9026 Arbitrator Bars General No-Smoking Rule
- 03739027-9054 in the Matter of Arbitration Between Schien Body & Equipment Co., Inc. And United Steelworkers of America, Local Union No. 8557 Fmcs No. 77k17279 No Smoking Rule Grievance No. 77-1 Decision of Arbitrator
- 03739057-9058 Alexandria Smoke Eaters Can't
- 03739059
- 03739062 Lighting A Fire Under Smokers
- 03739063 Lighting Up? Bounced Out
- 03739064
- 03739065 Virginia Town Bars Smokers As Firemen
- 03739066-9067
- 03739068-9069
- 03739071-9072
- 03739073
- 03739074
- 03739075-9076 Smoking Restrictions Are Proving Popular But Hard to Enforce
- 03739080 Federal Judge Cites the Constitution in Refusing Smoking Ban in Public Building
- 03739081 Return to Prohibition: Smokers Arrested, Fined and Jailed in Chicago
- 03739082 Today's Anti-Smoking Prohibitionists Follow Path Blazed by Carry Nation.
- 03739083 Police - Can They Enforce Smoking Prohibition Laws?
- 03739084-9085 Lawmakers Balk at Excessive Smoking Bans,
- 03739086
- 03739087-9091 Kentucky Department of Labor Occupational Health Newsletter
- 03739092-9093
- 03739094-9095
- 03739096-9098 Dining Out: Should Smokers Be Segregated?
- 03739099-9100 Second-Hand Smoke - Is It Harmful?
- 03739101
- 03739102-9103
- 03739104 Smoking Ruling Irks Gasp
- 03739105
- 03739106 A Puff for Duffy
- 03739107 Judge Nixes Nonsmokers' Court Suit
- 03739108 A Smoking Issue Ignites
- 03739109 Pipe Smoker Is Assaulted; Man, 62, Is Arrested
- 03739110 2 'no Smoking' Cases Doused
- 03739111-9112 Members of Gasp Make Citizens' Arrests of Smokers in Orange County
- 03739113-9114 Two-Year-Old Smoking Ban Works - Even If It Is Unenforceable
- 03739115 His $100 Goes Up in Smoke
- 03739116 No Smoking
- 03739117 the Smoker in Elevator Case
- 03739118 Did Smoke Get in the Eyes of Justice?
- 03739119 Chicago Court's A Drag for Subway Smokers
- 03739120 Smoking Wasn't Worth It
- 03739121-9122 Smokers Facing More Restraints, Stiffer Penalties
- 03739123 Give That Man A Big Cigar?
- 03739124 Slavney's Stogie Gets A Grievance
- 03739125 Lights Out From Court, Complicates His Problem
- 03739126 Smokers Court Gets Tough
- 03739127 No Writing on the Wall Puts Legal Smoke in Their Eyes
- 03739128 City Smoking Ordinance Ruled Valid, Trial Is Set
- 03739129 Fired Up, Newsman Smokes Out Co-Worker
- 03739130 First Person Tried Under No-Smoking Law Acquitted
- 03739131 74 Held in Violation of New Smoking Law
- 03739132 the Case Hinged on Fire
- 03739133 Smokers on Bus Are Sentenced
- 03739134 City's No-Smoking Law Gets Court Test
- 03739135 Dup of Id 03739128
- 03739136-9137 Judge Chides Nations Conscience in Beach Smoking Verdict
- 03739138-9140 All Aboard for Chicago's Costliest Puff
- 03739141 Smoker Meets His Match in Court
- 03739142 Cigaret on An Elevator Costs Him $250 Fine
- 03739143 Smoking Landmark Case
- 03739144 Lack of Respect for Laws May Be Test Case
- 03739145 Nabbing Smokers Is Easy As Netting Smoke
- 03739146-9147 Gasp Still on War Path Even After Losing Case
- 03739148
- 03739149-9150 Newsletter
- 03739151
- 03739152-9153 They Fume About Smokers
- 03739154-9155
- 03739156-9157
- 03739158
- 03739159-9160 No-Smoke Break
- 03739161
- 03739162 Is Tobacco Smoke A Aealth Hazard to Nonsmokers?
- 03739163
- 03739164-9165
- 03739166 Smoke Billows From City Ordfnance Hearing
- 03739167
- 03739168-9179 States' Statutes Regulating Smoking in Public Places
- UCSF Legacy ID
- stb74c00
Document Images
FOREST. the Freedom Organisacion for the Right to Enjoy Smoking Tobacco, claims there is no evidence
that'bassive" smoking-breathing other people's smoke-is harmful. But the evidence is growing
Sherridan Stock -. Smoke from any source consists of
ix a scientist and a - minute particles suspended in a
smoker -" mixture of gases that usually
_ . include volatile organic substances
and water vapour. A single cigarette produces about five
million million particles, each measur]ng about 02 ym
amoss. They are droplets of tar, and consist of numerous
chemicals; altogether there are about 3000 different
. chemirzls in cigarette smoke. Some of these chemicals,
including nicotine, are present in the unburnt tobacco, but
most are formed during combustion: Table 1 lists some of
the more toxic ones and shows thetr biological importance,
r Smoking a cigarette produces two main kinds of smoke;
mainstream smoke, which is what the smoker draws into his mouth (and usually on into his lungs); and
sidestream
smoke, which issues into the atmosphere when the
cigarette is held smouldering (or "idling"). From the
passive smoker's point of view, it is side-stream smoke
rather than exhaled mainstream smoke that is the more
important. First, a cigarette produces about twice as much
~ side-stream smoke as mainstream smoke. (Side-stream
smoke may be less conspicuous though, since it is produced
over a far IonSer period-about 10 minutes per cigarette
compared s.ith only 20-30 seconds for mainstream smoke.)
5ecandly, many of the chemicals in tobacco smoke are
presenr in hiKhcr <vncentratiuns in sideatream smoke,
often con,iderably so. Md thirdly, side-stream smoke is
"unfiltered", both by the cigarette filter, and more
importantly, by the smoker himself. whose body retains
substanttal amounts of the constituents of the smoke that
he inhales. ' -
FOREST maintains there is no evidence that passive
smoking is harmful to healthy peopie-althougn the c3se
s seems to be conceded for that large segment of the popula-
tion suiiering from allergies or lung or heart disease. This
assertion is in error; there is evidence. It is also misleading,
for it implies that the relevant data have been sought,
evaluated. and found to be negative. In fact the data are
sparse, and it is this sparsity that is being taken as proof
that health hazards do not exist. Doubtless the same rash
elaim was repeated ad nauseam in connection with many
uther environmental pollutants before their hazards were
appreciated (as in the case of smoking itself). .
It seems at least possible, if not probable, that passive
smoking of sidastream smoke, often heavy, and repeated
over a lifetime, could give rise to the same alarming
spectrum of disease suSered by the smoker himself. The
incidence and severity would be expected to be much fess
among "passve smokers" though; their exposure will
obviously be less intense due to the dilution in ambient aftr
(and of cnurse the "active" smoker also breathes diluted
side-stream smoke). One complicating factor is that low-
level exposure to a toxin can sometimes be more toxic
than exposure to a higher level of the same toxio-pos-
sfhly berause the higher dose kills target cells instead of
setting pernicious metabolic events in train-and it is
believed that this might occur with certain of the chemicals
in tobacco smoke.
. -Studies to establish whether passive smoking could
reuse any of the diseases associated with active smoking
would need to be as prolonged and comples as those
required to demonstrate such disease in smokers. How-
ever, only a handful of such studies has been attempted,
and the results of these are not in the least reassuring.
There have also been many shnrt-term studies, and studies
measuring atmospheric or bodily pollution, though of
course the latter can provide only suggestive evidence of
harmful effects. Some of these are now summarised.
.ei
0

l New S<ientist 2 Oclohcv 1930
Report nn Smoking and 'This risk of bronchitis and pneumonia in the
_ Hcalth covcludes ". .' it is very young is appreciably increased if either parent
possible to .. demonstrate ehanpes in smokes, These illnesses be life-threatenin
psychmnomr _ , g
--Tunctlan at levels of curbon . at this acagen ...' . jnonovide found in passive smnking conditions
. smukers. The reason is not
In active smokers, uarbosyhaemoglobin levels are fre- clear, but Dr Miller proposes
- quently in the a10 per cent range, and in very heavy that long[crm passive smok-
-smokers may even approach 20 per cent. At these levels ing alone could account for
-:mental function-including the abi]ity tu drive-clearly the finding.
deteriorates. Drivers who smoke may thus create risks for 13, Tobacco smoke removes
others. ., . . - d . . negative ions from the atmo-
dn Los Angeles,avhere pollution is a special problem, sphere, which is already
~ research has shown that atmospheric levels of carbon grossly depleted of its
~ monoxide above about A ppm are assnciated with an natural cemplement by
; increase in the overall mortality rate. To what degree, if urban pollution and various
? any, these elevated levels of carbon monoxide me respon- other factors associated with
I sible for the excess mortality is not clear; but an adverse modern. mammade environ-
effect eHect on very ill patients, part.irularly those with lung or ments. Negative ions henefit
J heart disease, would not be unexpectcd. the human body in many
i 10. Passive smoking begins in the womb, and there is little ways, and are necessary for
' daubt that smoking during pregnancy can damage the full mental and physical
y unborn child. The main effects seems to be to retard intra- health. In recognition of this effect
of tobacco smuke, some
uterine growth and development (probably by reducing company executives have installed negative ion
generators
the blood supply to the uterus), with the result (as shown in their offices and cnnference rooms. -
by Professor N. A Butler of the Bristol Royal Hospital for 19- Immunological studies conducted by
Professor Carl
Sick Children, and H. Goldstein) that the babies are borrt Becker and colleagues at Cornell Medical
Center, New
smaller and go into childhood with reduced height and York Hospital, have shown that both active and
passive
with some educational retardation. -- snoking can probzbly sensitise a person to a glycoprotein
Further. in women who smoke there is anfncrease in the found in tobacco smoke. The signincance of
this is not
stillbirth and neunatal death rate. In fact it has been clear, but Professor Becker suggests that
continued
calculated that maternal smoking results each year in the exposure tu tobacco glycoproteln could
damage the arteries
death of 1500 babies in Britain and 4600 in the United of a sensitised subject, and accelerate the
development of
States. Professor R- Saeye of Pennsylvania State Oniver- atherosclerosis_ Further, tobacco
g!ycoprotein contains a
sity College of biediune has demonstrated that much of flavonoid, rutin, which act!vates the blood
clotting system.
the In¢ease in the rxte of stillbirths and neonatal deaths and this might therefore complement the
above effect to
associated wilh maternal smoking probably results from produce arterial thrombosis. Becker also
speculates that
placental disorders, and that the incidence of these dis- persons sensitised to tobacco glycnprotein
mayy as a result.
. orders increzses with the number of years that cigarettes become allergic to a wide variety of
other allergens that
have been smoked. This finding suggests that established contain slmilar glycoproteins.
. smokers who give up smoking during pregnancy-highly 15. According to the World Health
Organisation, "Health
desirable though this may be-might still run the risk of is not only ttie absence of disease and
infirmity, but also
losing their babies through their previous cigaretie con- the presence of full psychological,
mental, and sonal well-
,Sumption. " I - . 1 be+nK'. On the basls of this admittedly broad but none the
~-11. Several studies have demonstrated that children whose less sensible definition, smoking must
damage the health of
. parents smoke, suffer more Inwer respiratory tract disease millions ot people wno do not smoke.
(This concept proved
.~ (eough, whceze. bronchitis, pneumonia) than children to be a significant factor in getting the
Howard County
..; whose parents do net smoke, The same also appears to be Clean Air Act of 1977 enacted, which
requires resraurants,
::Yrue for upper respiratory tract disease (colds, influenza, shops, offices and many other public
places in Howard
' Dhaqrs4i[is. [onsillitisl, and this has recently been enn- County, Maryland, to provide separate
areas for people
firmed by a'study from the Institut Natinnal de la Sante who do not smoke.) :-..`. ,;._.'' - ` et de
la Recherche \tedicale;.which demonstrated that In addition to all this, which I believe will
eventually
children of smokid¢ parents are about twice as likely to be seen as only the tip of the iceberg,
smoking affects norr
.. have their tonsils and/or adenoids removed than children smokers in many other ways-too numerous
to discuss
"whose parents do not smoke. However, other factors be- . here. The main reason for smoking is
vndoubtedly to
sides pas,i.e smokln¢ mav play a part-for evample, if obtain the effects of the psychuactive dru:,
nicotine; people
` smoking induces respvatnry disease in the parent, the have no inclination to smuke materials that
do not contain
~ parent could then infect the child. Yet, even when only such drugs. It is a most terrible
indictment of modern man
parents withuut symptoms are cunsidered,and other cnn- and his life.style that so many people depend
upon a drug
founding factors are mntrolled, the risk of bronctuHs and to the exlent that they are prepared to
sacrifice their
. pneumoma in the very young is appreciablv increased if health and their lives in order to obtain
it, and in the
either parent smokes: convincing evidence of an effect of pivicess are blinded to the mental and
physical harm that
passice smoklne. I'h.ese ilhu-stes con be life-threatcninG at they inflict upon those who have to
live alongside them,
this agc. Furthermore, lower respiratory tract illness in Perhzps I ran end with a nuotation from Dr
H. Slahle:,
the voune appears to give rise to impaired lung function direclorgeneral of the World Health
Organisation, takcn
and hest riise,ese in later childhood and in adulthood, even from his address to the Fourth World
Conference an Smok
o ^ tn those whn du not take up smoking, ing and Health, June 1979~ "Indi-
, 12. In a remarkable new study conducted in Erie County, vidoa7s and governments are com- tf h'e
Pennsylvania. Dr G. H. Mill n '
er at Edinboro State Coll e^e in t lth t h
ca
i a
w
1 ki
is
whose husbands are long-standing cigarette smokers, die, do, it affects the health and the ~~~~ l~
M.
on average, four y'ears earlier than women married to nom quality of life of everyone. .,." 0 =1.=^~
g
.
.
esmo g
i
Pennsylvania, has tlemonsGa[ed that non-smoking w'omcn something that unly indisidunls can

. New Scienust 2 Oetober 1980
- 1. About 75 per cent of nomsmokers find it .
cigarette smoke for two Niroti < ndocF«alksferds Tmm'm(moral oyens!)
hours and then undertook I pbenol Irrnnu.na onnr
mademte excrcise They (L yromoters
experienced pain much GmeemDhme souner than when they had Niveuminer, Hydnclne. Vinyl chloride,
Grcinogent
nut been expused_ Patients ursthan< wi[h thronic bronr.nitis or I py,iLine. AtAeEyEer (Pormahkhyde,
Ttaim or irtlnnu
empnysema would presum- Aceraldenrdcqcrolein/,Hydrogen
ably be affected simll.vly; ryan,de,uiuogeno,adn,Ammem.,
certairdv they ran espe:, earboo mono.me ence nonnus respuatory diss The indunion of n appears <
aior n.qa:
tress in smoky atnmspheres, In'eiation and promotion~A mnar inmamr ie a rnbna c ma ior
e mat brass
and .me nrfIDn5t2nceS aeour rne in en [,aee, tEet b ron. v a r. mr1 ral inie a dor.
reactions cnuid perneps be I m r a Tan^o Oro enaer.ioo r^ne'rcmat^onsme
IifPthreatemng Co e: I
. n < Irtnle en a or~ a e
4. 'Cobacco smoke rontains I prn e tn. . ~ , ~le o .e to mq yoro.~y:mp a als~~.ta >nd naboom j
n u m e r o Y 5 nrnnOy'enic I~a ^ . v me~ a; rnoge am ia oaEl' ot bnnmmg e tn* I
(eaneer-pruduanq/ m
A c ~open ~r s~6v ~uame rG ce aot a noge
sub~ mo-emapo ,.. cn.~a.uaaone. acuon nru e1l
stances,itduding 1000 or so
. tobacco smoke may prr ,Itisashockingthing,blowingsmokeoutofourmouths tnasmnkyr0omsnhaleas
dispase irritated eyes to much benzpyrene in one
both bacterial and viral into other people's mouths, eyes and noses- and having hour as they would
by
f n f e c t i o n s. Contac[dens the same thing done to us.' - Scmuel Johmon smoking four
clgarettes, and
wearerssurferparticulardis- according to the Britsrt
comfort. Other symptoms include headache (32 per cent), Ffedical Journol (1976, Vo] 2, p'te31
benzpyrene from this
. nausea 19 percenUr dizziness or lightheadedness (6 per source is responsible for about two cases
of lung car.cer
eent).loss of inemory, difiieulty in concentration, depressive per year per 100 000 nonsmokers who
receive regular and
personatitychan¢es.doublevisian,andevenblacisoutsy fairly teavy exposure to tobacco smoke. However,
this
2. Peopiee with allergic disease (about 10 per cent of the calculation takes no account of tl:e
other substances in
population), particularly hay fever and asthma suHerers, tobacco smokn associated with cancer, which
could have
are even more likely to suffer symptoms when exposed an additive or even synergistic eHect. Most
cancer
to tobacco smoke. Speer's study has shown that of those resezrcisets now subscribe to the linear
theory of carcino-
non smoking allergic patients adected, 73 per cent com- genesis rather than the threshold
theory-that is, there is
plain of eye Im[anon, 67 per cent of nasal symptoms no "safe" level of a carcinogen.
(sneezine, dripping. stuthnessi, 46 per cent of headache, Nitroszmines are also well represented in
tobacco
46 per cent of coughing. 23 per cent of wheezine, 23 per smoke; these are extremely powerful,
orgxmspecific
. cent of sore throat. 16 per cent of hoarseness. 15 per cent carcinogens in animals, and much
indirect evider.ce sug.
of nausea, and 5 per cent of dizziness. Other people's gests that the same is true in man. In fact
r.itrosan:ines
, tobzcrn smoke is one of the most serious problems asth- and various other organ-specific
carcinogens in tobacco
matic patitts have to faee in daily life. It can precipitate smoke may contribute to smokers'
higher rates of cancer
a Eull-hlown attack in same of the opper digestive and
.., panents, and it has been Table I Somebiologicallyimportantcons[ituentsai aeas,respiratorp
tracti, the pan-
eas, acd the lower uriaary
shnwn to induce or aqgra~ eigarette smoke
- vate symptoms in more than tract. Ritrosamines can be
50 per cent of a>thmatte Sab.wnca Pmaerry p r e s e n[ in sidestream
- children. (When the expo- '>^n'nataeepn^ae smoke in quantities fifty
. sure is from parental smnk- Poi rromrzlc Eydronrbons Cancer initlaeon, times those present in
main-
promoten.
ing the children often show ranor -stream smokc; and a non-
-improvement if therr ~ .... ! °ollo''or smokerinasmokyroomcan
, parents stop smokinq in '
Dibenarridinee. Dibenxonrbssole, and Cancer inichren inhale in one hour nitro-
their presence.) ' amerav.-armes , samines equivalent to fnhal-
' 7- Patients with chronic rynbytindoles MesAylorbssoles, - Councinogens ing the mainstream smoke
. heart or lung disease are ears:noh . from up to 35 fttertipped
- especialfy vnlnerabie..In nne . Nisroe,m;ner, pwonmmato, wnenir, ---GronoaI nr dgarettes,
study, patients with angina Nirk.lmmpounm,Gdmiummmpounm . . Incidentally, people who
pectoris were efsposed to wromnic aminea -Bladder carcmoaem live in Utah but are not
annoying to be fn the presence of a cigarette
smaier. while at least 50 per cent of non-
..mokers say they suder detinite ill effects
from passive emokiny. (About 55 per cent of
British adu!ts are nurtsn:okers.) In one studv
Or F. Speer nt the Children's Mercy
Hospital. Kansas City, showed that of those
healthy (nonUllereic) non-smoker,s a6ected.
69 per cent complain of eye irritation, 29 per
cent of nasal symptoms (itc]ting, sneceinql.
25 per ren[ of cev.hinc, 6 per cent of sore
throat. 4 per cent of hoarseness, and 4 per
eent complain of .vheezine. The main eye
sym_otnms are stinging, itchmg, and watering,
and constant exposcre to
. potycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. which are
probably the most important. Of thcsc hydro-
carbons the most studied, but not necessarily
the most intportantt is benzpyrene; a single
cigarette generates about 130 ng and more
than 100 ng of this enters the atmosphere
directlv in side-stream smoke. Pipe tobacco
liberates considerably more benzpyrene than
the same amount of cigarette tobacco, protr
ably mainiy because tobacco burns at lower
temperatures in pipes. Although tobacco
xsmoking pmduces far less benxpyrese than
~ coal tires or the ubiquitous garden bonfire, the
;difierence is that benzpyrene from tobacco
~smoi:ing is often released
into confi:ted
spaces. Indeed, non-smokers

I
U
li~~WlS~W3 iJr'~3*I9S1?u~1~3G9
r
I.,,y?c ~, ::Mah~,w s~s >
..rts:ava
~~~~~ dm? JA
~I as y~~ p»wu~~ ~
i.~ in:RuwnunoCeinmsw G°L'°Ln-vveeL.
I Frornthe Illustrated London \ews: July 1900,ubove;
; and Seplembe. 1892 (right)-fears were that tFx chotera
1 ePHem,c in fiamourg would spread to England .
'Nicotine is a co-mrcinogen; a substance that
augments the action of carcinogens, of which
there is no shortage in the environment of
-'
yIdtiliditil
.,. -,nusrase socees .. ~ ,
LY C
pELIC10o5 . IMPORT.aIi t "- .
-
~- s t~ a~ - DR, TASSINARL
~
Mormons have u lower incidence of lung cancer than the
general population of the US (the Mormans, who of course
generally are nonsmokers, have an even lower inadence).
It seems possible that reduced passive smoking could at
least partially account for this finding.
5. As already indicated, the partJcles in cigarette smoke
are mnute-indeed. they are in the colloidal sire-range,
and by virtue of their large surface area have tremendous
. adsorptive propeYies. Surface-active agents, which are
abundant in the respiratory system, are readily adsorhed.
They interact with the colloidal particles in cigarette smoke
to form a cantple<, which accumulats with contlnued
exposure. These complexes may irritate the lung lining-
and may even lead to emphysema or possibly cance-
whether formed in the lungs of a smoker, or anyone who
GDEN'
O
ROSE
OTTO DE
CIGARETTES,
PURE VIRGI.~'IA. .
FIRST QUALITY.
.. PURE RIOE PAPE9,
ARE U~RIdALLE9.
tion Atmospherique et Affections Respiratofrs Chroniques,
in which the passive smoking of wives of smoking hus
bands was examined. A further study faund reduced
pulmonary function in children whose parens smoked.
g. About threequarters of the nicotine released by a
filter-tipped cigarette is Rberated into the atmosphere in
side-stream smoke, and Drs M. A, H. Russell of the Institute of Psychiatry and C. Feyerabend have
shown that
most urban non-smokers have nicvtine in their body fluids
for most of their lives. (Passive smoking is virtually
unavoidable in towns.) Nicvtine is an alkaloid with a wide
spectrum of biological activity and is more acutely toxic
than either arsenic or cyanide. However, the latest /1979) US Surgeon Genr.ral's Report on Smoking
and Health cron-
siders that nicotine in the environment is of coacern
inhales cigarette smoke. - because in smokers it is believed to accelerate athero- 6. Non-smokers
who work in smoky offices have Cursch- sclerotic disease. Of more concern perhaps, is the recent--
mann's spirals in their sputum, whereas those who are not finding by Or F. G. Bock at Roswell Park
Memorial Insti- -
exposed to passive smoking do not. (Curxhmann's spiraLs tute, Buffalo, New York. that nicotine is a
coMarcinogen-y ,. ~
are casts of jellitied mutvs which form within the small a substance that augments the action of
carcinogens, of :-
bronchi and bronrhioles of patients with chronic bronchial which there is no shortage in the
environment of indu.s- .
- disorders.) This provids some evidence that passive trlalised societies. smuking can impair the
action of the miaoscopic "hairs" 9. A cigarette generates up to about 70 mg of carban~~ ~
(cr7ia) that line the airways of the lungs, whose normal monoxide, some 50 mg of which is released
in side-stream function is to remove inhaled dust partides and bacteria smoke; the concentration
compares with that in vehide
by propelling them, trapped in a blanket of muaus, up into exhaust. In smoky rooms, like pubs and
conference rooms, the throat where the mucus is (imvluntarily) swallowed ._
thecarbonmonoxidclevelisusuallyabout10-15ppmbutmay
In fact cigarette smoke contains mare than ten chenticals
which poison the atLOn of respiratory cilia, and thus
encourage mucus to stagnate in the lungs of the smoker.
This state renders the smoker more liable to infection, ond
further is believed to facilitate the development of lung
cancer by causing the retention of inhaled carcinogens.
7. In on important new study involving over 2000 subjects,
Drs ], R. R'hite and H. F, Froeb at the University of
California, San Diego, found that non-smokerz who had
worked alongside smokers for many years had significantly
poorer lung function than non-smokers without such
exposure. In view of the particular tests employed, the
tindrn¢s suegmc disease of tae "small" ainvays, which are
broncni and bronchiules of less than two millimetres
diameter-a condition which mzy be related to the
deve!opment of chronic bronchitis. Disturbingly, but not
really surprisingly, the aRUal valus obtained (15 to 20
per cent lower than normal) wese comparable to those
found in aaive smokers smoking up to 10 ciRare;tes a day.
Simiiar resulls have now been reported from a large
French study conducted by the Couperative Group, Pollu-
be much higher, particularly if the air is recirculated with- '
uu[ being adequately cleansed, and in confined spaces such as vehicles, where peaks of up to 95 ppm
have been
recorded in the vicinity of a person smoking a single
cfgareae. (The level in the home of a non-smoker is about 2 ppm, white that of the outdoor air in
London measured '
6 m above pavement level and 10 m from the edge of amzjor roadway averages about 35 ppm.)
Protracted
esposure to such elevated levels can increase the rnneen-
tratian of carboxyhaemoglobin in the blood-and only
modest elevations will impair psychumolor function Ithe
ability to perceive and react to stimuli like light and
sound). Such impatrment could be important in people
driving cars, or nperaling machines. However, researchers
do not agree abnut the m mum carboxyhaemoglobin
level required to impair funeHOm some have tound impair-
ment at a level as low as 2 per cent f which passive smokers
could achieye~, while others believc that 5 per cent is
more realistic (which wnuld not be reached through pas-
sive smnking).
On the basis of the prescnt data the US Surgeon General's
C o~L~_Z+e
REpMY
