Lorillard
Mind If I Smoke?
Fields
- Author
- Schneider, K.
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT FILE ROOM
- Alias
- 03738868/03738872
- Type
- NEWS, NEWSPAPER ARTICLE
- Named Organization
- Bell Telephone
- Civil Aeronautics Board
- Communication Workers of America
- Enviromental Improvement Associates
- Gold Creations
- House Medical Affairs Comm
- Medical Univ Hospital
- Natl Interagency Council on Smoking
- Nj Bell Telephone
- Pee Dee Tobacco Warehouse Assn
- Piccadilly Cafeteria
- RJR, R.J.Reynolds
- Roper Hospital
- SC Electric + Gas
- SC Lung Assn
- Senate Medical Affairs Comm
- Southern Bell
- St Bartholomews
- St Francis Xavier Hospital
- TI, Tobacco Inst
- Veterans Administration Medical Cen
- American Lung Assn
- Civil Aeronautics Board
- Copied
- Froeb, H.F.
- Stevens, A.J.
- White, J.R.
- Stevens, A.J.
- Named Person
- Allen, H.E.
- Anderson, J.T.
- Calvert, J.M.
- Froeb, H.F.
- Gooch, M.N.
- Gore, G.E.
- Gruccio, P.A.
- Leland, J.M., J.R.
- Marcus, L.J.
- Mclees, W.A.
- Nast, L.E.
- Robinette, B.K.
- Shimp, D.M.
- Spieler, G.
- Stephens, F.F.
- Stine, G.B.
- Surgeongeneral
- Tompson, C.G.
- White, J.R.
- Wise, T.D.
- Wolfe, V.V.
- Anderson, J.T.
- Document File
- 03738759/03739179/S and H Re Allergic Responses Effect of Smokers on Non-Smokers Vol 1 82-77.
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- Request
- R1-004
- R1-037
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Characteristic
- ILLE, ILLEGIBLE
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- Site
- N14
- Master ID
- 03738724/9179
Related Documents:- 03738726
- 03738727
- 03738728
- 03738729
- 03738730
- 03738731
- 03738732
- 03738733-8742 Proposed Rule 101-20. 109-10 Regulations of Smoking
- 03738744 Rules Proposed to Curb Smoking in Federal Offices
- 03738745
- 03738746 Smoking Ban Sought
- 03738747-8758 Use of Tobacco Practices, Attitudes, Knowledge, and Beliefs United States - Fall 640000 and Spring 660000
- 03738759 S&H Re: Allergic Responses - Effect of Smokers on Non-Smokers Volume I - 770000 - 820000
- 03738760 Prior Correspondence to 770000 Has Been Destroyed, As Authorized by Mr. A.J. Stevens.
- 03738761 Effect of Smoke on Nonsmoker
- 03738764
- 03738765
- 03738766-8767 San Mateo County Firefighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo Defendants and Respondents Order to Show Cause in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 288890
- 03738768-8779 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo, Et Al., Defendants and Respondents. Declaration of Leo C. Middendorf in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 288890 Exhibit B Employment Requirements - Physical Standards, No-Smoking Clause
- 03738769-8771 Exhibit D
- 03738772-8773 Exhibit E
- 03738774 Exhibit F
- 03738775 Exhibit C
- 03738776 Exhibit B Employment Requirements - Physical Standa Rds, No-Smoking Clause
- 03738780-8786 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo, Et Al., Defendants and Respondents. Declaration of John Mollinelli Jr. In the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 268890
- 03738782 Exhibit G
- 03738783 Exhibit H
- 03738784 Exhibit I Nepotism
- 03738785 Exhibit J
- 03738786 Proof of Service by Mail
- 03738787-8820 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners, Vs. City of San Mateo, Defendants and Respondents. Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief and for Writ of Mandate and Declaratory Relief in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo
- 03738821-8839 San Mateo County Fire Fighters Local 2400, Plaintiffs and Petitioners Vs. City of San Mateo, Defendants and Respondents. Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief Petition for Writ of Mandate in the Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo Case No. 268890
- 03738837 Verification
- 03738838-8839 Exhibit 'a' Employment Agreement
- 03738840-8841 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03738842 Memorandum to the Committee of Counsel
- 03738843-8860 Irene C. Parodi Petitioner, US. Merit Systems Protection Board and Office of Personnel Management Respondents Opinion Appeal From the Merit Systems Protection Board Argued: 820210 Submitted 820413 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Mspb No. Sf 83i Lo9012 No. 80-7671
- 03738862
- 03738863-8864 Ashrae Seeks More Ventilation in Comm. Bldgs.
- 03738865
- 03738873-8876 The Perils of Second-Hand Smoking
- 03738883-8884
- 03738885
- 03738886-8887 He Wants Cigarette and Choice of Seat
- 03738889
- 03738890-8891
- 03738892-8893
- 03738894-8895
- 03738896
- 03738897
- 03738898
- 03738899
- 03738900
- 03738901-8902
- 03738903
- 03738904-8905 TI Newletter
- 03738906-8914 Smoking in the Workplace
- 03738915-8916
- 03738917-8920 Greater Rockford Food Service, Etc., Plaintiff, Vs Joseph Orthoefer, Etc, Et Al, Defendants. Memorandum of Decision State of Illinois in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit County of Winnebago No.76-2447
- 03738921-8922 Greater Rockford Food Service Plaintiff, A Chapter of the Chicago and Illinois Restaurant Association, A Not-for-Profit Corporation, Plaintiff, and City of Rockford, A Municipal Corporation, Intervening Petitioner, Vs. Joseph Orthoefer, Administrator of the Winnebago County Health Department, Et Al., Defendant. Judgement Order State of Illinois in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit County of Winnebago in Chancery No. 76-2447
- 03738923
- 03738924-8925 If You're Hooked on Gigarettes, Read on
- 03738926
- 03738927
- 03738928
- 03738929-8932 Business Smoking Survey
- 03738933
- 03738934-8935 Smoking in Public Places ... Professors Disagree
- 03738936
- 03738937
- 03738938-8939 Statement of the Pennsylvania Tavern Association with Respect to Smoking Ordinances and Laws.
- 03738940-8941 Nonsmokers Try to Clear the Air
- 03738942-8943
- 03738944
- 03738945-8947 A Smoker's Lament
- 03738948
- 03738949-8950
- 03738951
- 03738953 Matter in Dispute Between Cala Foods. Inc, and Retail Clerks Union Local 648 Involving the Discharge of Jack Hamm
- 03738954-8975 in the Matter of Arbitration Between Cala Foods, Inc. And Retail Clerks Union Local 648 Concerning the Termination of Jack W. Hamm Opinion and Award of John Phillip Linn
- 03738976
- 03738977 Experts Defend Public Smoking
- 03738978-8979 Panel Told Smoking Not Hurting Non-Smokers
- 03738980-8981 Conclusion of Mcaward Case in East Boston District Court Involving A Non-Smoking Passenger on Board American Airlines Flight, Boston Logan Airport, 780515
- 03738982-8984 the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Vs. John Mcaward, East Boston District Court, East Boston, Massachusetts, 780711
- 03738985-8986
- 03738987-8988 Cigarette Smoking the Facts About Your Lungs
- 03738989-8990 Companies Put Up the 'No-Smoking Sign
- 03738991
- 03738992 Smoking Limits Aim of Director of Health Agency
- 03738993-8994 Winnebago County Smoking Ordinance
- 03738995-8998 Winnebago County Smoking Ordinance
- 03738999-9001 Ordinance
- 03739003
- 03739004-9006 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, V. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Complaint State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75ws4270
- 03739007-9009 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, Vs. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Answer State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739010-9012 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, Vs. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Amended Complaint State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739013-9016 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, Vs. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Answer to Amended Complaint State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739017-9019 William T. Mccracken, Plaintiff, US. O.B. Sloan, Defendant. Order State of North Carolina County of Mecklenburg in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739020-9021 Wm. T. Mccracken Vs. O.B. Sloan Plaintiff's Document List North Carolina Mecklenburg County in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division 75 Cvs 4270
- 03739022-9023 Effect of Smoke on Non Smokers
- 03739025-9026 Arbitrator Bars General No-Smoking Rule
- 03739027-9054 in the Matter of Arbitration Between Schien Body & Equipment Co., Inc. And United Steelworkers of America, Local Union No. 8557 Fmcs No. 77k17279 No Smoking Rule Grievance No. 77-1 Decision of Arbitrator
- 03739057-9058 Alexandria Smoke Eaters Can't
- 03739059
- 03739062 Lighting A Fire Under Smokers
- 03739063 Lighting Up? Bounced Out
- 03739064
- 03739065 Virginia Town Bars Smokers As Firemen
- 03739066-9067
- 03739068-9069
- 03739071-9072
- 03739073
- 03739074
- 03739075-9076 Smoking Restrictions Are Proving Popular But Hard to Enforce
- 03739080 Federal Judge Cites the Constitution in Refusing Smoking Ban in Public Building
- 03739081 Return to Prohibition: Smokers Arrested, Fined and Jailed in Chicago
- 03739082 Today's Anti-Smoking Prohibitionists Follow Path Blazed by Carry Nation.
- 03739083 Police - Can They Enforce Smoking Prohibition Laws?
- 03739084-9085 Lawmakers Balk at Excessive Smoking Bans,
- 03739086
- 03739087-9091 Kentucky Department of Labor Occupational Health Newsletter
- 03739092-9093
- 03739094-9095
- 03739096-9098 Dining Out: Should Smokers Be Segregated?
- 03739099-9100 Second-Hand Smoke - Is It Harmful?
- 03739101
- 03739102-9103
- 03739104 Smoking Ruling Irks Gasp
- 03739105
- 03739106 A Puff for Duffy
- 03739107 Judge Nixes Nonsmokers' Court Suit
- 03739108 A Smoking Issue Ignites
- 03739109 Pipe Smoker Is Assaulted; Man, 62, Is Arrested
- 03739110 2 'no Smoking' Cases Doused
- 03739111-9112 Members of Gasp Make Citizens' Arrests of Smokers in Orange County
- 03739113-9114 Two-Year-Old Smoking Ban Works - Even If It Is Unenforceable
- 03739115 His $100 Goes Up in Smoke
- 03739116 No Smoking
- 03739117 the Smoker in Elevator Case
- 03739118 Did Smoke Get in the Eyes of Justice?
- 03739119 Chicago Court's A Drag for Subway Smokers
- 03739120 Smoking Wasn't Worth It
- 03739121-9122 Smokers Facing More Restraints, Stiffer Penalties
- 03739123 Give That Man A Big Cigar?
- 03739124 Slavney's Stogie Gets A Grievance
- 03739125 Lights Out From Court, Complicates His Problem
- 03739126 Smokers Court Gets Tough
- 03739127 No Writing on the Wall Puts Legal Smoke in Their Eyes
- 03739128 City Smoking Ordinance Ruled Valid, Trial Is Set
- 03739129 Fired Up, Newsman Smokes Out Co-Worker
- 03739130 First Person Tried Under No-Smoking Law Acquitted
- 03739131 74 Held in Violation of New Smoking Law
- 03739132 the Case Hinged on Fire
- 03739133 Smokers on Bus Are Sentenced
- 03739134 City's No-Smoking Law Gets Court Test
- 03739135 Dup of Id 03739128
- 03739136-9137 Judge Chides Nations Conscience in Beach Smoking Verdict
- 03739138-9140 All Aboard for Chicago's Costliest Puff
- 03739141 Smoker Meets His Match in Court
- 03739142 Cigaret on An Elevator Costs Him $250 Fine
- 03739143 Smoking Landmark Case
- 03739144 Lack of Respect for Laws May Be Test Case
- 03739145 Nabbing Smokers Is Easy As Netting Smoke
- 03739146-9147 Gasp Still on War Path Even After Losing Case
- 03739148
- 03739149-9150 Newsletter
- 03739151
- 03739152-9153 They Fume About Smokers
- 03739154-9155
- 03739156-9157
- 03739158
- 03739159-9160 No-Smoke Break
- 03739161
- 03739162 Is Tobacco Smoke A Aealth Hazard to Nonsmokers?
- 03739163
- 03739164-9165
- 03739166 Smoke Billows From City Ordfnance Hearing
- 03739167
- 03739168-9179 States' Statutes Regulating Smoking in Public Places
- Author (Organization)
- Charleston SC News + Courier
- UCSF Legacy ID
- uby61e00
Document Images
/U
LEGAL ISSUES n 7,1-
~
.~---~`~~--
~ V
~~o ke-eL
. -
~~
'
it iefiht lt
Thiss no anssu o rgs.s an issue of health and courtesy.
lf one person doesn't want you
r. to smoke, you shouldn't smoke.'
By KEITH SCHNEIDER'
Stat( Reporter
Thursday did It. Thursday Feb. 28 - the
day Lehan 1. Marcus decided he'd suf-
fered his last headaches; wiped away the
last tear from his watering eyes; washed
his ]ast shirt which smelled as if it had
hung In a bar all day; inhaled his last
.
breath from the cloud of cigarette smoke Smokmg" lt says
G
,
, , ._
loitering in translucentcolum ns about his Marcus says the smoking in the repair
'
He
desk.d had it It was time ta speak up. , - service bureau bothered him from the first 3_
Until that day, Marcus was simply an _ day he started working for Southern Bell: 1~'
other emolovee at out ern eIl's'Pepper- 1.
+
'
'
q
hen you
t want to kick
,
re new you don
am Work Center in North Charleston - a, too much. But every day I would leave '
s
ou re atrevearo es
, - -- desk there and feel depressed. The smoke really
technician working alongside 35 other em- made me sick."
ployees in the center's windowless repair Then came Thursday. "The air condi-
fervice bureau. tioner never worked properly in the room
Now Marcus knows he Is cast in two That day it wasn't working at all. I wasn't
more roles - hero and villain - as he the only one getting sick. There were
leads the stron est challen e mount others. I sat at my desk and breathed that
a atn g, q rscrulralioar.ing stuff all day and I decided something had
smoking employees to practice their habit ' to be done."
If
the
case
is
~e5' ' The foilowing Monday Marcus returned
settle7c'4r'court,''court, where it to.work armed with a petition' "We the
ap Parc r" hP . Hg y a^a~ e.undr<tg~ reo,~est hat a no smokina
state~Ct:Aationai Hea_lth and Safetystat- ru(e be tuted_in_the_r.epair_~rrise
utes bv including smo_ke ~ a toxic sub bureau. dangerous ~o~he
stance that shoul be banned from the . health of the smoker... re-breathed smoke
s'or m y~gTve non-smoTctog can aggrava e ef- afi lth conditions of the non-
.propor.ents the legal foothold they need to V smokers ... It Increases the carbon manox-
enact a statewide Clean Indoor Air Act - ide content of the work place and may
CHARLESTON, S. C.
NEWS & COURIER
D. 66,4G0 - S. 96,741
CNARLESTON METROPOLITAN AtEA
;v 10 '~ 3r;
prohibiting smoking in public places. At' a~ headachesanddecreasedproductiv-
stake: the health of South Carolinians and .. Ity - with the medical knowledge of the ~
the future of the state's S2C0 million dollar.' effects of smoking on smokers and non-
tobacco crop. t smokers It is in the company's best Inter-
A smoker for most of his adult life. est to discourage it In the work area."
~arcus says he quit before moving from lyfarcussigned first, (ollowedby?0other
feA York to South Carolina three years pmpta~s b7c(p3m `wo. supet
^+1s9ts
ago. "I quit because it was hurting my -wer e~f the next four months,
health." he says. "But tt doesn't really the petition circulated throughout the corn-
matter whether I quit or not. I breathe so pany -(rom Marcus' lirstlevel supervi-
much smoke at work, it's like I'm sitting in - sor all the way to Atlanta and Southern
i giant ashtray." Bell president LE. Nast-
The repair service bureau at Pepper- By June, the company bad formulated
dam Work Center is a large room, scarred ' its response. ' They offered to segregate
'iy the ei(ects of tobacco. There are brown ' -
marks on the orange carpet where hot
~shes burned until spent. Unwatchfd butts -'. (See Page 4-E, Column 0
'It's just harassment as far as i'm
concerned. If they re going to
out/aw tobacco, they should out-
law liquor ~oo. That's more of-
fensive to me.'
~
.melted large holes in plastic sheets pro-
tecting the tops of test desks. Gray ash
dusts computer cards held upright in cir
cular files. The room smells of smoke.
There is an irony to this room too. At one
,end is a door opening into a smaller room
~e
~
~
containing sophisticated switching equip-
ment piled high with miles of electric A
There is a stgn posted there
"No
cable
I
,

C
Just
10 years ago a nonsmoker
asking a smoker to stop puffing in
public would have caused a reaction
like this: "Are you kidding? Beat
It." Embarrassed, the non-smoker
would have retreated to the nearest
open window.
Not anymore. Not since research
ers compiled reams of medical evi-
dence linking smoking to a host of
killers: cancer, emphysema, stroke,
heart disease. Statistics released by
the National Interagency Council on
Smoking and Health say 350.000
Americans die prematurely from the
effects of smoking. The report says
$8 billion in health care expenses is
directly related to smoking. More
than s15 billion is lost by industry
through employees who smoke and
are Involved in accidents, extended
smokers from non-smokers." says
Marcus, "but that wouldn't do any
good because the room is set up for .
different people In different jobs.
They also tried to fix the air condi- '
tioner, but It still doesn't work some
days."
"We trted to work out a solution '
Says ames :a a vect, enera ,
mana ero~disfnution~$out ern
-SeTi-~a~ ln _nlu_mh_ia_, "tS~O,I_
fered to move e~m loyees to different
_,sections. T ll-C ctrculationin the room
was'checke an it u_beTleiba
envttqpmentyiists~ay it~tas to be, I
don't know what else would be in
order."
io~n, the Communt- r smoker It s my life and my lungs.
cation Workers of i's I'll take my chances."
LEIiAN J. ~ America, and was Until recenUy, the non-smoker had
MARCUS lj:urned down, "I ~' no response except to say the smoke
guess they're hurt his eyes. But In 1973 two re
caught in the middle," explains Mar- , searchers from London's St Bartho-
ens. "The Union represents smokers ; i lomew's Hospital wrote a report
and non-smokers." I saying non-smokers who breathe
"I don't really buy the union's ' smoke from lit cigarettes and ex-
reasoning either," says Brenda K- ' haled breath face the possibility of '
"Cookie" Robinette, 33, a test desk j, serious health hazards-The research
technician who has never smoked. ; - says carbon monoxide levels in the
"This is not an issue of rights. It's ' blood of non-smokers are raised sig
an Issue of health and courtesy. If nificantly when in the presence of lit
one person doesn't want you to ' cigarettes. Long-term chronic expo-
su to m k tn ublic laces and
re s o e
smoke, you shouldn't smoke I suffer
from migraines and there is nothing
worse for migraines than breathing
cigarette smoke."
"I guess the only thing we can do
now," says Marcus. "is go to court."
"If he takes us to court that's his
right," says James lf. Leland Jr.,
division manager for Southern Bell's
coastal division- and the man serv-
ing as the company's spokesman on
this Issue. "We've got 1,400 employ
ees in the Lowcountry and a lot of'
~ them smoke. A lot of them don't
smoke. But there are certain things
we are not going to recognize as
company pattcy. We are not going to
recognize this minority of people
who want to eliminate smoking for
everybody.
"Some of the people in there are
smokers and they have rights too. I
am a smoker myself. I just left a
meeting with 15 people. I'd say a
third of them smoke. We're not going
to eliminate smoking' in there be-
cause some don't like it- I'm sure
some don't. But I smoked my pipe
and let spirals go up to the ceiling
anyway.'
"What's in or ;- Illness or who work below their pro-
der," answers ductive potential-
~`Marcus, 'is to All the bad news has caused the
prohibit smoking smoker 'to listen. Last year, the
in that room." He American Lung Association released
:, and many other : a study which says 33 percent of
--employees are , adult Americans smoke. That figure
.
the
=dissatisfled with isdown from 42 percent in 1964
,
~
-.~the company's ?. year of the first Surgeon beneral's
respon -Report on Smoking thatiinked ciga-
~y~ hel lfarcus rette smoking with lung cancer. .
.~ urned to his un I "Wltat's tt7p probtem?" asks the
: ~.
i.
p p
the work place, says the report, may
; , result in "appreciable long-term
~ negative health consequences."
Other reports followed. The latest, .
released In March by James R.
/ White and Dr. Herman F. Froeb,
measures the effects of passive
smoking by non-smokers chronically
exposed to co-workers' cigarettes.
pipes and cigar smoke. The re-
searchers tested 2-100 middle-aged
workers and concluded "chronic ex-
posure to tobacco smoke in the work
environment is deleterious to the
non-smoker and significantly re-
duces small airways function in the
lungs." Reductions in small airways
function, note the authors, often
precedes such crippling diseases as
emphysema.
All of a sudden the non-smoker
breathing the smoke of others in
public places apparently has a rea-
son to be worried. Yet. waving scien
tifle evidence in the face of a man
who needs a cigarette is like trying
to stop a charging tiger with a water
pistol. Medical research had to be
translated into law.
Cd beginning of the transttion oc-
curred in December 1976 in a small
New Jersey courtroom. There, Don
na M. Shimp, a 44-yearold service
representative with Yew Jersey Bell
Telephone; hauled stacks of medical
data, dozens of expert witnesses and
the telephone company before Supe-
rior Court Judge Philip A. Gruccio
and convinced him her healLh was,
being ruined by all the smoking at
her work place - a phone company
store in ;ttillville, N.J.
Mrs. Shimp based her case on law
common not only to New Jersey, but
also to every state in the nation:
Every employer must provide his
employee with a safe place to work
tree of hazardous and toxic materi
ais. Mrs. Shimp told Gruccio that in
15 years with the company she en-
countered chronic heavy cigarette
smoking at work which caused her
nose to bleed, her eyes to tear, head
aches, nausea and stomach distress.
. 14ost alarming though - her corneas
were beginning to erode because of
the smoke.
Gruccio ruled the telephone com
pany must provide Mrs. Shimp with
a smoke-free work environment
And in a written decision, Gruccio
left no doubt that the health rights of
the non-smoker prevail:
- "There can be no doubt that the
by-products of burning tobacco are
toxic and dangerous to the heaith of
the smoker and non-smoker.
- "It is clearly the law that an
employee has a right to work in a
iafe envuronmenL An employer Is
under ap affirmative duty to provide
a work area that is free from unsafe
conditions. -
- "The evidence Is overwhelming
and clear- Cigarette smoke contami-
nates and pollutes the air, creating
a health hazard not merely to the
smoker but to all those around her
who must rely upon the same air
supply."
The decision In Shimp vs. yew
Jersey Bell Telephone lent new
strength to groups seeking to estab-
lish laws against smoking In public
-places. To date. 32 states and the
DLstrict of Columbia have passed
legislation limiting smoking in en.
closed public areas. In 1976. `tinne-
sota enacted the most rigorous laws
in the country against smoking In
, public. Smoking is outlawed in all
public buildings, theaters corridors,
elevators, buses and taxis.
The law requires empioyers to se-
gregate smokers and non-smokers in
work places. Restaurants are re-
quired to have a smoking and non
smoking section Nebraska enacted
a similar law last year. And New
York's House of Representat ves re-
centty voted to establish a Ciean
Indoor Air Act. A contirtnation vote
by Che Senate is expected soon.

. Ofore than 500 cdue2ies and munte-
fpalitles have passed non-smoking
legts:ation. Airlines are increasing
(heir nd-smoking sections while the
Civil Aeronautics Board is deciding
whethEr to ban smoking on domestic
nights altogether. Smoking Is al-
lowed on interstate buses only in the
last three rows. Thousands of restau-
rants have added non-smoking sec
tlons. -
Despite the nationwide movement,
South Carolina has enacted little no
smoking legislation.
It's not that there wasn't Interest.
In 1977, Beaufort County enacted the
state's first Yo Smoking Ordinance
to regulate smoking In pubilcowned
or public-supported places. The ordi-
' nance limited smoking to designated
areas and provided penalties for vio-
lations. Smoking is prohibited in ele-
vators, county council chambers,
county courtrooms, county public li-
( braries, public meetings in public
supported facilities- public waiting
rooms In public-supported facilities
and in buses operating In the county.
There are designated areas for
smoking In most Beaufort County
buildings. Violation of the ordinance
may subject a person to 15 days In
jail or a S50 fine.
The three-yearold ordinance, says
Gerhard Spieier, a Beaufort County
staff inember, "has worked out very
well. In the beginning some fun was
made. But the signs have been ob-
eyed on the whole."
A month after Beaufort County
passed the no smoking ordlnance.
Dr. Gordon B. Stine, then a ChaHes-
ton County councilman, introduced a
nearly identical measure to county
; council. By 3tay, county council
scrapped the proposed ordinance In
favor of adapting a resolution to
encourage regulating smoking In
public buildings and public-support
ed buildings. The resolution was
adopted. There are, however, no
penalties for smoking In areas
d marked with No Smoking signs.
Stine, now county council chalr-
man, is still disappointed: "If It were
up to me. there would be no smoking
In public places, period. From a fire-
safety angle, you're endangering
many lives. From a healthsafety
angle, you are definitely endanger-
ing your own life plus the person like
myself, who doesn't smoke.
Later that year. In September,
Sen. T. Dewey Wise fD-Charlestonl
wrote the state's first Clean lndood
Air Act based primarily on the Beau-
fort ordinance. The bill was studied
by the Senate Medical Affairs Com-
mittee and released to the Senate
floor where it died when the legisla-
ture went home during the summer
of 1978.
Last. year. the bill was reintrod-
uced into the House Sfedical Affairs
Committee. It died there.
Herman E. Allen, smoking In their rooms. .~nd In
executlve director I rooms with more than one bed, the
S h C hts f m-smoker are para-
o th
o-
t
uon ana ine uul a -«-s1, .,1-~ ~~,~ ,--° -
major supporter, ' are obeyed, "for the most part." it
, the tobacco peo- Is still difticult to enforce the rules
le have been suc- when a smoker becomes beligerent.
!
p
~ *- cessful in killing 'There aren't any punitive penal-
; this bill." The rea-
~ son: South Caroli-
~ na's fluecured tles," says ~IcLees. "If a smoker
BRENDA K.
ROBINETI'E
tobacco crop an Insists on smoking we can t prose
nually generates cute. We can suggest he stop. 1t an
more than $200 etnpioyeecontinuestosmokewecan
million for the do something about that."
state'seconorny. The issue of wheth- It's no simpler at any of the other
er smoking should.be outlawed In area hospitals. St. Francis Xavier
Hospital and the Veterans Adminis-
~ tration Medical Center have en=
(See Page 12E, Column 1)> forced stringent no-smoking
+ regulations for some time:
- , In February, Roper Hospital
: : ~ .,,,~ ~ i _ ~ changed its smoking regulations to
i~~ ~ match those at the Medical Universi-
. tY Hospital.
Elrewhere in the county, no-smok-
Contfnued From Page 4 E
public isyet another attack on their
livelihood, say tobacco growers.
In April, Carroll G. Tompson, ex-
ecutive vice president of R.J. Rey
nolds Tobacco Co', summed up his
feelings before the annual meeting of
the Pee Dee Totiacco Warehouse As-
sociation: "Two issues are plaguing
the tobacco industry. The taxation of
our products and the health issue.
Anti-smoking zealots are making
smoking difficult and even embar-
rassing for our customers."
F. Frank Stephens, one of the larg-
est tobacco~ growers in the Dillon
area, says antt-smoking legislation.
would be "discriminatory." "It's
just harassment as far as I'm con-
cerned." says Stephens. "If they're
going to outlaw tobacco, they should
outlaw liquor too. That's more offen-
sive to me."
Tobacco growers have effectively
stalled passage of the Clean Indoor
Air Act. "As far as the legislature is
croncerned, the issue is dead," says
Allen. "But we're going to put the
bill in the hopper again next fall. I
still think there is a lot of interest In
the rigpts of nonsmokers."
If Charleston County Is any Indica-
tion, the interest is more than just
passing. Despite the reluctance of
state and county legislators to pass
an act with penalties, many private
businesses and health) facilities are
creating smoking regulations.
By far, the area's most rigorous
no-smoking regWations are In force
in Lowcountry hosoitals.
At the Medical University Hospi-
tal, executive administrator WUliam
A. McLees says the hospital began
enforcing its no-smoking policy in
the summer of 1977. Smoking is not
permitted by staff inembers pa
tients or visitors in corridors, eleva-
tors, stairways, clinic waiting
rooms, nursing stations or any office
where there is direct contact be-
tween staff and patient. No tobacco
producs are soid in the hospital..
i
C
ar
ng
~ ot the ou
~}, lina Lung Associa- mount.
Ing rules are less vigorous. Last year
the Coastal branch of, the S.C. Lung
Association polled Lowcountry res-
taurants and discovered slightiy
more than a dozen offer diners a
choice between smoking and no-
smoking sections. "There were
many customers who were offended
by cigarette smoke," explains Gary
E. Gore, manager of the Piccadilly
Cafeteria in Charles Towne Square.
"Some people actually get sick when
they smell smoke."
Small business proprietors are be-
ginning to post No Smoking signs in
their stores. "I posted my sign be-
cause I'm pregnant and the smoke
bothers me tremendously," says
Vicki V. Wotfe; owner of Gold Crea-
tlons In the City Market. "Whea
customers comein with a cigarette I
ask them to put it out. The men are
nice -about it. The women can be
ugly. One lady said. "Weil. see if I'll
shop in here anymore. I said: "Lady.
do I look hungry?"
City of Charleston fire regulations
prohibit smoking in movie theaters
and in Gaillard Municipal Alidito-
rium except in designated areas.
Also, smoking is not permitted an
South Carolina Electric and Gas
operated buses.
That regtilatlan is particularly dif-
ficult to enforce. "We have had two
complaints ihis week from people
who found the smoking obnoxious'
says Jay Thomas Anderson, an
SCE&G executive assistant. "It's
very hard for operators to stop the
bus and tell someone to get off be-
cause he is smoking."
In talking to those people who have
taken active steps to regulate smok-
ing in their business areas, one of the
first things they mention is the help a
statewide law would give. That is
where Lehan Martvs and 20 other

. . ~-..~
repair service bureau employees people feel it would be very hard on
come in. them not to be able to smoke while
With the help of Donna Shimp and working since they've been able to
Environmental ImproJement Asso- all this time.
ciates, a non-profit corporation Mrs. . "But whatever decision is made by
Shimp formed to help people in NIar- the majority I will go with.. Maybe
cus' position, Marcus will challenge If they did stop the smoking In here it "
South Carolina's common law re- might do me a little good. I'm not
garding employment safety. - stupid enough to say it's not injuring '
"I would be eatremeiy surprised it my health. I'm quite sure it is. It's a
Southern Bell allows this case to dirty, nasty habit and it might be to
reach court," says Mrs. Shimp. Wa advantage if it goes the other
"The evidence is very clear. Second- Lehan Marcus Is convinced Ic wilL
hand smoke is an occupational
health Ee says he has no other choice. He
hazard." likens passive smoking to long-term
At Pepperdam, Marcus' col- homicide. "Someone who smokes in
leagues who smoke aren't sure he public is pointing a gun at your heart
will win. It's a difficult decision and , and lungs. It might not go off today
a touchy subject because both sides or even in a year. But you know .
have a right to the way they feel," breathing all that smoke isn't any
says Mary Y. Cooch, repair clerk good for you. You also know it might
and smoker for 37 years. "Some kill you."
. . .'-~

---
