Lorillard
Defendant's Exhibit Aj Why Some 'good' Husbands Run Away
Fields
- Author
- Merson, B.
- Merson, D.
- Type
- NEWS, NEWSPAPER ARTICLE
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT FILE ROOM
- Alias
- 03710302/03710305
- Site
- N14
- Named Person
- Bradley, M.
- Denton, F.
- Goldfader
- Liswood, R.
- Steigman, J.E.
- Weiss, S.
- Xxjohn <Bradley, J.>
- Xxjulie <Bradley, J.>
- Xxkent <Bradley, K.>
- Named Organization
- Family Location Services
- Tracers Company of America
- Wall Street Journal
- Aid to Dependant Children Program
- Bureau of Missing Persons
- Date Loaded
- 12 Feb 1999
- Document File
- 03709922/03711227/Litigation Re Robert Brian Vs Loews Record on Appeal.
- Master ID
- 03709063/1227
- 03709063-9368 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff, Against Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant. Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York Deposition of Robert M. Sandelmann
- 03709369-9408 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff, -Against- Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant. Notice of Motion Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York Index No. 6859/1977
- 03709370-9371 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff, -Against- Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant. Affidavit of Neal Johnston Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York Index No. 6859/1977
- 03709374-9380 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff, -Against- Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant. Affidavit of Neal Johnston Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York Index No. 6859/1977
- 03709381-9383 Robert Brian V. Loews Theatres
- 03709384-9395
- 03709396-9397
- 03709398
- 03709399-9400 Robert Brian V. Loews
- 03709401 Robert Brian V. Loews Theatres
- 03709402 Brian V. Loews
- 03709403-9406 File No. 722 3232 Lorillard Co., Et All
- 03709407-9408
- 03709409-9425 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff, -Against- Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant. Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant's Motion for A Protective Order Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York Index No. 6859/77
- 03709426-9471 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff, -Against- Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant. Notice of Motion Supreme Courtof the State of New York County of New York Index No. 6859/77
- 03709428-9437 Robert Brian Associates, Inc. Plaintiff, -Against- Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant. Affidavit of Neal Johnston Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York
- 03709438 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff, -Against- Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant. Affidavit Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York Index No. 6859/77
- 03709439-9445 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff, -Against- Loew's Theatres, Inc. Defendant. Notice for Discovery and Inspection Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York Index No. 6859/77 Exhibit A
- 03709446
- 03709447 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff, -Against- Loew's Theatres, Inc., Defendant. Notice for Discovery and Inspection Supreme Court of the State of New York / County of New York Index No. 6859
- 03709448-9450 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Against Loews Theatres, Inc., Summons Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York Exhibit B
- 03709451-9454 Robert Brian Associates, Inc. Plaintiff Against Loews Theatres, Inc. Defendant Complaint Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York
- 03709455 Corporate Verification
- 03709456 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff, -Against- Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant. Summons & Verified Complaint Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York
- 03709457-9458 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff, -Against- Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant. Verified Answer Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York
- 03709459 Verification
- 03709460 Affidavit
- 03709461-9463 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff Against Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant Note of Issue Supreme Court, New York County, N.Y. Index No. 6859/1977 Exhibit C
- 03709464-9467 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff - Respondent, -Against- Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant - Appellant. Appellate Division of Supreme Court Held in and for the First Judicial Department in the County of New York 5734 Exhibit D
- 03709468-9470 the Terms of Plaintiff's Contract Exhibit E
- 03709471 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff, -Against- Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant. Notice of Motion and Affidavit Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York Index No. 6859/77
- 03709472-9488 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff, -Against- Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant. Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant's Motion for A Protective Order Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York Index No. 6859/77
- 03709489 Affidavit of Service by Mail
- 03709490-9535 Dup of Id 03709426-9471
- 03709492-9501 Dup of Id 03709428-9437
- 03709502 Dup of Id 03709438
- 03709503-9509 Dup of Id 03709439-9445
- 03709515-9518 Dup of Id 03709451-9454
- 03709521-9522 Dup of Id 03709457-9458
- 03709528-9531 Dup of Id 03709464-9467
- 03709537-9596 Kent Gallery
- 03709597-9614 Kent Gallery Poster
- 03709615-9616 the Kent Gallery
- 03709618-9729
- 03709730-9743
- 03709744-9760
- 03709761-9785
- 03709786-9801
- 03709802-9907
- 03709908-9909 Kent Shopping Bag Sweepstakes
- 03709910
- 03709911-9921 Mr. O'connor's Speech - 740109 Presented at Luncheon Meeting - Mcei
- 03709922-1227 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff - Respondent, Against Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant - Appellant. Record on Appeal New York Supreme Court Index No. 6859/77
- 03709931-9933 Plaintiff's Exhibit 1 Foote Cone & Belding Confidential Account Report
- 03709934-9937 Plaintiffs Exhibit 2 May Condition Letter
- 03709938 Plaintiff's Exhibit 3 Omitted
- 03709939 Plaintiff's Exhibit 4
- 03709940-9949 Plaintiff's Exhibit 5 Kent Promotions
- 03709950-9957 Plaintiff's Exhibit 6 'presentation to Kent'
- 03709958 Plaintiff's Exhibit 7
- 03709959-9960 Plaintiff's Exhibit 8
- 03709961-9962 Plaintiff's Exhibit 9 Kent Castle Contest
- 03709963-9966 Plaintiff's Exhibit 10 Lorillard Steak Knife Promotion for 720300/720400
- 03709967 Plaintiff's Exhibit 10 Two - Sides Hanging Card
- 03709968 Plaintiff's Exhibit 10 Coupon
- 03709969 Plaintiff's Exhibit 10 Display (90 Carton Unit)
- 03709970 Plaintiff's Exhibit 10 Small Card for Pack Sales & Vending Machines in Supermarkets
- 03709971 Plaintiff's Exhibit 10 Salesmen's Brochure
- 03709972 Plaintiff's Exhibit 10 Design Area Display
- 03709973 Plaintiff's Exhibit 11
- 03709973A Plaintiff's Exhibit 11
- 03709974-9975 Plaintiff's Exhibit 12
- 03709976 Plaintiff's Exhibit 12
- 03709977 Plaintiff's Exhibit 12
- 03709978 Plaintiff's Exhibit 12
- 03709979 Plaintiff's Exhibit 12 Kent Promotions
- 03709980-9981 Plaintiff's Exhibit 12a
- 03709982-9983 Plaintiff's Exhibit 13
- 03709984-9987 Plaintiff's Exhibit 14 'relevant, Seasonal, Original' Contests Keep Lorillard in the Public Eye
- 03709988 Plaintiff's Exhibit 15
- 03709989-9991 Plaintiff's Exhibit 16 Kent Castle Promotion
- 03709992 Plaintiff's Exhibit 17 Kent Castle Promotion
- 03709993 Plaintiff's Exhibit 17 Kent Castle Promotion
- 03709994-9995 Plaintiff's Exhibit 17 Kent Cigarettes Promotion
- 03709996 Plaintiff's Exhibit 18
- 03709997-9998 Plaintiff's Exhibit 18 Lorillard & Co. And Design Services (Knightsbridge) Kent Castle Scheme Statement
- 03709999 Plaintiff's Exhibit 18
- 03710000 Plaintiff's Exhibit 18
- 03710001 Plaintiff's Exhibit 18
- 03710002 Plaintiff's Exhibit 18
- 03710003 Plaintiff's Exhibit 18
- 03710004 Plaintiff's Exhibit 18
- 03710005 Plaintiff's Exhibit 18 Lorillard & Co. And H. Margary Esq. Kent Castle Scheme Statement
- 03710006-0007 Plaintiff's Exhibit 18 Kent Castle Scheme
- 03710008 Plaintiff's Exhibit 19
- 03710009 Plaintiff's Exhibit 20 Omitted
- 03710010 Plaintiff's Exhibit 21 Omitted
- 03710011 Plaintiff's Exhibit 22 Coffee 'n Kent Promotion
- 03710012 Plaintiff's Exhibit 22 Kent'n Coffee Promotion Revised Copy Approach Base Display
- 03710013 Plaintiff's Exhibit 22 Kent'n Coffee Promotion Revised Copy Approaches Store Coupon
- 03710014 Plaintiff's Exhibit 22 Store Coupon
- 03710015 Plaintiff's Exhibit 22 Kent'n Coffee Promotion Promotion Procedure
- 03710016 Plaintiff's Exhibit 22 Kent'n Coffee Protion Revised Copy Approaches (Order Form)
- 03710017 Plaintiff's Exhibit 22 Coffee 'n Kent Promotion Costs
- 03710018 Plaintiff's Exhibit 22 Is There A More Effective Way to Spend the Supermarket Merchandising / Advertising Allowance?
- 03710019-0075 Plaintiff's Exhibit 23
- 03710076 Defendant's Exhibit A New Point-of-Sale Displays
- 03710077-0080 Defendant's Exhibit B Lorillard Conference Meetings with Robert Brian Associates, Inc. 700000
- 03710081 Defendant's Exhibit B Menthol & 100's
- 03710082 Defendant's Exhibit B
- 03710083-0084 Defendant's Exhibit B
- 03710085 Defendat's Exhibit B Timetable -- Kent Promotions 700000 - 710000
- 03710086-0087 Defendant's Exhibit C Kent 000600 Review
- 03710088-0090 Defendant's Exhbit C Kent 000700 and 000800 Review
- 03710091 Defendant's Exhibit C Audio-Vend Projector
- 03710092 Defendant's Exhibit C Projection Systems
- 03710093-0095 Defendant's Exhibit C Audio-Vend Commercials
- 03710096-0097 Defendant's Exhibit C Budget Analysis Kent Service Group
- 03710098 Dup of Id 03710092
- 03710099-0100 Defendant's Exhibit C Kent Service Report
- 03710101-0102
- 03710103-0104 Defendant's Exhibit E-1 File No. 722 3232 Lorillard Co., Et Al.
- 03710105 Defendant's Exhibit E-2 File No. 722 3232 Lorillard Co., Et All
- 03710106-0107 Defendant's Exhibit E-2 Letter 720509
- 03710108 Defendant's Exhibit F
- 03710109-0120 Defendant's Exhibit G Kent Promotions
- 03710121-0123 Defendant's Exhibit H Kent's Put It All Together Promotion
- 03710124 Defendant's Exhibit I Prize Structure
- 03710125 Defendant's Exhibit J Contact Report
- 03710126-0127 Defendant's Exhibit K Official Rules and Judging Procedures Purposed for Kent Castle Contest
- 03710128-0129 Defendant's Exhibit L
- 03710130 Defendant's Exhibit M Omitted
- 03710131 Defendant's Exhibit N Loews Corporation, Et Al File No. 722 3232
- 03710132-0140 Defendant's Exhibit N Loews Corporation. Complaint Before the Federal Trade Commission File No.
- 03710141-0149 Def. Ex. O Loews Corporation Agreement Containing Consent Order to Cease and Desist in the United States of America Before Federal Trade Commission File No. 722 3232
- 03710150 Def. Exhibit P the Kent Premium Club
- 03710151 Defendant's Exhibit Q Omitted
- 03710152 Def. Ex. R A Work Study for A Period of One Month - 'kent' Account - 000509 to 000609
- 03710153-0158 Def. Exhibit S-1 U.S. Small Business Corporation Income Tax Return
- 03710159-0168 Def. Ex. S-2 U.S. Small Business Corporation Income Tax Return
- 03710169-0178 Def. Ex. S-3 U.S. Small Busness Corporation Income Tax Return
- 03710179-0184 U.S. Small Business Corporation Income Tax Return
- 03710185-0193 Def. Ex. T-1 Art Estimate Old Gold Filter's 'homerun for the Money'
- 03710194 Def. Ex. T-2 Confirmation Order
- 03710195-0198 Defendant's Exhibit U Promotion Status Report and Correspondence
- 03710199-0215 Defendant's Exhibit V
- 03710216-0217 Defendant's Exhibit W Castle Contest
- 03710218 Defendant's Exhibit X
- 03710219 Defendant's Exhibit Y
- 03710220 Defendant's Exhibit Z
- 03710221-0224 Defendant's Exhibit Aa the National Promotion Audit
- 03710225 Defendant's Exhibit Ab
- 03710226-0227 Defendant's Exhibit Ac
- 03710228 Defendant's Exhibit Ad Omitted
- 03710229 Defendant's Exhibit Ae
- 03710230 Defendant's Exhibit Af
- 03710231-0232 Defendant's Exhibit Ag America's Quality Cigarette Introduces the Kent Gallery
- 03710233 Defendant's Exhibit Ah
- 03710234 Defendant's Exhibit Ai
- 03710235-0238 Defendant's Exhibit Aj Merchandising Opportunities
- 03710239-0242 Defendant's Exhibit Aj the Newport Bonus Carton
- 03710243 Defendant's Exhibit Aj Barbeque Special
- 03710244 Defendant's Exhibit Aj Newport Bonus Carton Offer
- 03710245 Defendant's Exhibit Aj Transistor Bargain
- 03710246 Defendant's Exhibit Aj Newport Record Offer
- 03710247 Defendant's Exhibit Aj List of Premiums
- 03710248 Defendant's Exhibit Aj Newport Bonus Carton
- 03710249-0262 Defendant's Exhibit Aj Package Design Exploration
- 03710263-0273 Defendant's Exhibit Aj Innovations in Marketing
- 03710274-0280 Defendant's Exhibit Aj Other Consumer Promotions
- 03710281-0284 Defendant's Exhibit Aj 'little Wheels for Big Wheels' Win A Newport Oingo
- 03710285 Defendant's Exhibit Aj Win A Newport Dingo 'little Wheels for Big Wheels' Contest
- 03710286-0288 Defendant's Exhibit Aj Win A Newport Dingo.
- 03710289-0293 Defendant's Exhibit Aj 100 Salesmen Will Soon Be Proud Owners of Newport Dingos.
- 03710294-0298 Defendant's Exhibit Aj 'little Wheels for Big Wheels' for You and the Consumer
- 03710299 Defendant's Exhibit Aj Anna Scalfani Where Are You?
- 03710300 Defendant's Exhibit Aj Old Gold Is Looking for People Who Have Inherited A Fortune, But Don't Know It.
- 03710301 Defendant's Exhibit Aj Old Gold Is Looking for People Who Have Inherited A Fortune But Don't Know It.
- 03710306 Defendant's Exhibit Aj Marriage
- 03710307 Defendant's Exhibit Aj Tracer's Tracks Runaway Teens
- 03710308 Defendant's Exhibit Aj
- 03710309-0321 Defendant's Exhibit Ak
- 03710322 Defendant's Exhibit Al
- 03710323-0333 Defendant's Exhibit Am
- 03710334 Defendant's Exhibit An
- 03710335-0340 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff, -Against- Loe W's Theaters, Inc., Defendant. Request for Charges of Plaintiff Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York Index No. 6859/77
- 03710341-0352 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff, -Against- Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant, Defendant's Requests to Charge Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York Index No. 6859/77
- 03710353
- 03710354 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff -Respondent, -Against- Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. Stipulation Settling Transcript Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division : First Department Index No. 6859/77
- 03710355 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff -Respondent, -Against- Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. Affirmation Certifying Record Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division : First Department Index No. 6859/77
- 03710356 Robert Brain Associates, Inc., Plaintiff -Respondent, -Against- Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant - Appellant. Stipulation Relating to Omission of Certain Non-Documentary Exhibits From Record New York Supreme Court Appellate Division : First Department Index No 6859/77
- 03710828-0830 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff - Respondent, -Against- Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant - Appellant, Statement Under Cplr 5531 Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division : First Department 6859 / 77
- 03710831-0832 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff, -Against- Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant. Notice of Appeal Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York 6859/77
- 03710833-0835 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff, -Against- Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant. Pre-Argument Statement Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York 6859/77
- 03710836 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff Against Loews Theatres, Inc., Deffendant Summons Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York
- 03710837-0840 Robert Brian Associates, Inc. Plaintiff -Against- Loews Theatres, Inc. Defendant Complaint Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York
- 03710841-0844 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff, -Against- Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant. Verified Answer Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York
- 03710845-0846 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff, -Against- Loews Theatres, Inc. Defendant, Judgement Supreme Court of the State of New York County New York 6859 / 1977
- 03710847 Robert Brian Associates, Inc., Plaintiff Against Loews Theatres, Inc., Defendant Costs of Plaintiff Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York
Related Documents:
Document Images
t
e
Wh y Sorne
"Coocl"HusbuRds Run Awv
Ify UuNnTll1AsU UE'.V .NFRS0.Y
Y
It was a blazing August morning
But as Mary Brsdley walked up the flagstone path. glancing
at the letters she had just removed from the mailbox, she was
suddenly overcome by a sense of chill foreboding. One envelope
was in the unmistakable handwriting of her husband. Kent-
not from Philadelphia, where he had gone on business, but post-
marked "Grand C'entral, N.Y."
Tearing it o n with trembling finqers, Mary read: "I'm
leaving you. For . It'll be better for both of us, and for
the children. I've sold car, and am mailing their next term's
tuition to the school. I ha 't tuuched the joint checking or
saving accounts. iieep them. I get set, I'll send you what-
ever money I can. Sorry our marrl didn't work nut. I nttrod
it as long as I could. But I can't take , v more. Kent."
At first, Mary felt nothing. She was too ml,etl Iry disbelief
and shock. Kent ceouldn't have left her. Not a?hkr fifteen years
together.
Bewildered and frightened. Mary hurried into the Ttaµse. As
she looked around, the familiar rooms seemed strangelyieny
and she felt lost and alone in a hostile world.
Tragically, she was not alone. In America today there are
over two and a half million women who have been abandoned
by their hunband+. During the coming year, at least 100,000
more men will desert their wives and familie . It is an ever-
expanding cycle that entraps a growing riumher of victims.
Actually even this is only a fragment of the picture. For
desertions are the best-kept secret in the breakdown of modern
marriage: As Solomon Weiss, executive director of the Family
Location Service, explains, "Leia than 25 percent of the women
deserted by their husbands ever come to public nntice-antl
then only unwittinqh', when economic pressure fetrces them
to seek help from welfare agencies or the Kovernmrnt's- Aid
to Dependent Children Program." The wher ?5 percent fight
it out alone, making rtr.ry conceivable sacrifice tn keep the
world from knowing their plight.
What makes hu<bantls run'away? The principal rcaaonr are
infidelity, drinking. gambling, in-law interference and irre.pon-
sibility, reports the Farnily Location Service. But the Family
Location report is bas~l nnly on the runawav husbands who
have become official =tati.:tic.r, mainly men in the lower-income
group. It does nnt cnclude the vast majority whose wives never
report their di;rppearance-among =,ntinned .n page 122
JANUARV 1%B
them thousands of men like Mary's hus-
band. Kent. Such deserting husbands
ate in the middle- and upper-income
groups, and usually eara a minimum of
$10,000 a year. Rising young eaecutlves,
businessmen and profesaionals, they are
of the type conunonly associated with
economic success and domestic stability.
"Shese are the men," says Dr. Babacn
Liswoed director of the Maeriage Coun-
seling Service of Greater New York,
"whom psychologists sometimes refer to
as the 'good husbaoda.' The forces that
impel them to flee are much more eom-
plex aod subtle than those open.ting in
the eaae of the usual runaw,.y hus-
Most of theae "good husb.nds," Dr.
Lisrrood pointa out, are reapected mam-
ben of the eotnmunity who strive to
provide their families with "every-
thing." In their business and ptofes-
sional lives they make keett, objective
decisions as a matter of course. Yet in
some atau of their private lives their
judgments are curiously u»realistie.
Such men allow social pressutes-par-
ticularly status symbols-to dominate
their thinking and spending. Equally
unrealistic wives and meddling relatives
compound the pn-ssure. Often the re-
sutt is an increasing mound of debt,
building up through the yeara. With it
eomes mutual resentment, ene¢tinR a
barrier between husband and wife. Mis-
understandings mtolder and flame. Sex,
instead of bein: ao expreaaion of lo.e,
frequently becomes an unconscious ea-
presaion of hostility.
SYentually any--or aihf thfse pres-
surea touch off the psychic explosion
that hurls a man into the role of rtm-
away husband. It usually happens after
ten to fifteen years of marriage. Often it
is triggered by the man's shattering
tton that he will never be able
to teve his self-impoeed goals.
nting all thaee devious forces
fs the brAkdown in eommunintlon be-
twe.u hm and wife. This was what
Mary waa be R to eetlire that Au-
gust morning as searched for the
reason for Kent's ppeannee. This
had been the'tr 8nt er alone to-
gether. With John and J1tLe away at
camp, she had hoped she'~ttd Kent
might recapture .ama of the Qbaeness
they onae had kTtown. But somehow.
through the years, the same woNji
seemed to have acquired different,
meatunga.
With a pang. she rem«mhered their
last weekmd +nRether. Sunday after-
noon they had quarreled bitterly. it be-
Ran with a remark by Mary that attend-
ing the country-club party the night
h.fore had been a waste of money-
the food and service had been terrtble.
Kent retorted sharply that joining the
club had been Mary's idea in the Mt
place.
'1'hat's when everything went out of
forus. Baariminatlona ne.v back and
forth, each unaware of the preruns
that ware undermining their marriage,
and eaeh, in eagry bewildermant, atrik-
<. ~.,..a.~s.,.

s
ing out at the other. Kent accused Mary
of extravagance. She charged he waa to
blame.
"You and your mother are driving me
hankrupt," snapped Kent.
"Noiwdy has to drive you;" retorted
Mary. "You know all the shortcuts."
She'd had the last word-literally.
Kent did not speak to her for the re-
- mamder of the evening. In the morntng
he studiously ignored her as they sat
across from each ether at the breaktast
table. He was still seething over their
quarrel. Mary could feel her own anger
rising again. But she suppresaed it
"What tune will you be home tomor-
row?" she asked. -
"When I get here," said Kent shortly.
"Arty other questions?"
She wanted to ask why he'd packed
three suits, including a tweed winter
suit for a two-day trip in Attgtut. But
she suddenly remembered, with a faint
feeling of guilt, that she had neglected
to get hts sutnnter suits back from the
cleaner's.
Now, as she compulsively read and
reread Keni s farewell letter. Mary knew
why he had packed the suits. He must
have made up hu mind on Sunday
night that he'd leave her, 'Ihat's when
he had taken the suits out of his closet
right afur their quarreL But it couldn't
have been just the quarrel, she told
herself. Then had been other such ar-
gumenn during the past year. (Like the
wives of so many other "good" hus-
bands, Mary did not recogoisa that in
this repetitious pattern lay part of the
design for disaster.) He11 call, Mary
thought hopefully.
As if in mockery, the phone didn't
ring all day. When it finally did, as she
waa trying to swallow a few spoonfuls
of soup for supper, the words were out
of her mouth before she knew it "Oh,
Kent!" she cried.
"Kent!" said her mother sharply.
"Isn't he home? Wasn't he due back to-
night? Is something wrong?"
"Nothing ... nothing at all:" faltered
Mary. "Kent was delayed by btuinesa
in Philadelphia. He didn't know fcr how
long. He said he'd call. And when the
Defendant's Exhibit AJ
12?O
instinctive ganging up of men against They usually leave because of another
the common eaemy, the wife. The fear woman."
that her secret might be known made "Not Kent!" flared Mary. "If there
Mary break into tears. were another woman, I would have
"The deserted wife." points out Jo-
seph E. Stagtnan. former assistant di-
rector of the Family Location Service,
"may feel shame, gutlt, humiliation,
failure or anger. Often she feels that she
has failed in her marriage, that the chil-
dren will consider her responsible for
the father'a having left, and that her
friends and neighbors will think her
husband walked out on her because she
did not know how to be a good wife."
Fighting down her emb.rrasament.
Mary went to see Frank Denton, Kent's
superior at the advertising agency
where Kent had been a copywriter. "I'm
glad you dropped in, Mary," Denton
told her earnestly. "Because I want to
ansure you that I-personally-had noth-
ing to do with Kent's being passed over
for that promotion."
"I see," said Mary forlornly.
~ -- --°-I
j WRgNINI:! There is no connection between I
fl this magazine and any sa-olled Good I
. Housekeepiog Shop, Good Housekeeping I
~ Stare, Good Housekeeping Distributors, ;
i Good Housekeeping Products, Good House I
+ keaptng Centers, or any product or service i
I usittg the natne Gaoa HaUSEnEEP1Nt. If i
you have anY doubts write or wire Gooa
HousERZEnNa legal Dept., 959 8th Aw.. ~
~, New York, N.Y. 10019. L _ _I
What she saw was her last hope of
finding Kent go glimmering. Although
Kent's letter had plainly implied he'd
left his job, she had clung to the pos-
sibility that he had transferred to one
of the firm a out-of-town offices, and
that Denton would mention this in con-
versation. Instead, Denton said, "Kent
quit so suddenly he didn't give me n
chance to explain why I couldn't help
him."
Mary had known nothing of Kent's
.xpected promotion. He had lonq ago
ceased discusaing his job with her. B!rt
known it"
"Just as you knew he was going to
desert you." retorted her mother. "But
whatever the case, Kent must be found.
You have to be practical, Mary. Not
only for your own sake, but for the
children's. You'll never find Kent by
yourself. You must go to the police."
Relucrarttly Mary went and learned,
to her surprise, what is not commonly
known: The police will not search for
a husband who.deserts his wife. They
will send out a missing-persons alarm
only if they suspect the husband has
been the victim of an accident or foul
play. Even then, if it turns out that the
husband haa vaztished of his own ac-
r.ard, they will not reveal his where-
abouts to anyone, istdudinR his wife,
but merely report that he u urtharmed.
The only exception is when the wife
swears out a warrant charging t+imitul
abandontnent In that case the husband
is hunted down and jailed pending trial. "I couldn't have him arrested!' gasped
Mary. shocked by the vision of public
disCraace.
}(er attitude was typical. Few woman
swcar out warranu against their tniss-
inR husbanda. So few, in fact that the
chnrge of criminal abandonment has
fallen into almost total disuse. Instead,
a deserted wife is advised to file civil
proceedings for nonsupport- Even ff
her husband has fled the state, he no
longer has to be extradited. Beuuse of
reciprocal legislation, he oan ttow be
snmmoned before a court anywhere in
the United States-except the District
of Coltunbia-to arrange for voluntary
support. But first the husband has to
he found. And the police will not do
the searching. That is the wi(e's respon-
sibility.
Where could she go now? Mary won-
dered. And what should she tell the"
ehildren' 7hcy were dne home trom
ramp in a few days. Much arehe lonRed
for their homecomingr she dreaded it
Childrrn were stVtt¢ely intuitive about
phone rang. . . ." with the new house, the new car, and family trottbkS.
"Well, you sound upset," safd her the ehildren's school expenses, she But the'e was no hint of this
when
mother dubiously. knew now that he must have been tbi-Kldren piled out of the bus in front
"No;' said Mary. "Everything is fine." counting heavily on a big salary in-.of the door e:uberant
t1-year-old lu-
It was the first thrnd in the web of crease to pull him out of his Hnazaefal lie. and John, 14, lean
and blond like
lies and evasions which most deserted quagmire. Losing the prom mu.t his father.
wives feel forced to spin to conceal their have been a terrible shuc}s,~I' hat's~~~ ~I'hat's what
Before Mary could even greeri them,
broken marriage. For Mary could not did it," she told ltaraElf. 'T.tat's what Julie was burbling
excitedly, "Daddy
face the reality that Kent had deliber- drove him awlya~'Still, a nagging doubt called me last
night!"
ately left her. She was sure something persisted ,ylAf this could have been the "He called wu," said
John disdainful-
terrible must have happened to himm anl sew ly. "Person to person."
something that had suddenly blinded ch ttight Mary cried herself to With beating heart, Mary
listened to
his reason and judgmcr.t. ]f she co ' sleep. Each mormnR she arose hoping the detailed recital of
the children's
talk to him, find himh she migh e Kent would call. With great eHort, <he conversation with Kent She
wanted to
him see thinRS with new ey managed to go through her routine dai- cry out, "Did he ask for me' Dld
he
The next day she pii several of ly chores and put on a casual face for send his raeards? Did he even
mention
his close friends. were as tactful her friends. Kent was away on a pro- me'" Finally, aa Julie
paused. Mary
aa she tried t : o-they didn't know tracted business trip, she told them. She blurted out, before
she could restrain
Kent was aw y en a businvsa trip. wasn't quite sure when he'd retum. Her hrrself. "Where ws Daddy
calling trotn
One friend. however, didn't bother friends didn't question the explanation. --did he say?"
being dipiomattc. "Sorry. Mary." he But Mary knew her mother would. Julie shook her heed. Mary
turned to
said. "I'm afraid I can't help you." Mary told her the truth. 'It was probe- John. "Did he tell
you?"
Hia bluntnesa devastatee her. Had ably Kent's disappointment over hts "No, Mother. I didn't ask."
John
Kent tronfided in him? Did he and the job." she said defenaively. looked at her curiously. "Don't
yeu
othen know where Kent was? Prob- "Nonsenae," said her mother. "Men know where he is?"
ably. But they weren't tellfng ... the dq+'t leave their wives because of a job. contsnued on page
126

,
I
"Chicago. No . . Philadelphia. Yes.
That's it. Philadelphia."
Julie was now staring at her moth-
er. ioo. -Philadelphia?" repeated John.
"Thats not far. How eotne Dad doesn't
rome home for weekends?"
..Because he cui t" said Mary lamely.
"lYs ... it's just impossible."
What Mary feared had come to pass.
She was sure the children knew. And
as the days went by, she did not dare to
pretend any longer that she was hear-
ing from their father. John-sullen and
withdrawn-never mentioned Kent Ju-
lie did only once. "Is Daddy dead?" she
asked. She stopped playing with her
frienda, and only toyed with her food.
At night Mary could hear her sobbing
in her room. John played hooky frinn
school, and was constantly in fiatfWhts.
That was when Mary realized the time
for hoping and waiting waa past. The
children's weLfare was at stake. Kent
had to be found-and quickly.
Consulting herminister, Mary stresxd
the urgency of her problem. The minis-
ter made several discreet telephone calls
in her behalf. Then he told her that,
while marnage counseling and other as-
sistance were available, there was no
of6cial agency that would search for a
deserting husband. The Federal gavern-
ment-which spends millions to aid
methers of dependent children-has no
such facilities. Neither do public or pn-
vate welfare organisations. The sole ex-
ception is the Famtly Location Service.
But because of its limited staH, it rarely
accepts cases outside New York City.
For Mary the only answer waa a private
detective agency.
The next day ahe visited the New
York City offices of Tracers Company
I "Of t:ourse," said Mary in confusion.
Defendr.nt's L:JiiLit AJ
litter but speaks like a sociologist-
which !te is.
Dur.ng the 43 years of its existence,
his orgattisation has tracked dtwn more
than 75,000 missing husbands. The tna-
lonty were "good husbatttii" like Kent.
From his experience and training Gold-
fader tttidentood that it was not their
wtves they were fleeing from, but an
accumulation of pressures that had
warped their judgment In their confu-
sion, some husbands, before they van-
ished, even persuaded their wives to
have another child. Others, like Kent,
added to their burdens by buying new
tan and new homes in the vain hope
of escaping from reality by changing its
outward trappinp.
Yet even with their warped judgment
these men, when they deaeert, are un-
able to suppress some of the basic
qualities that make them 'good hus-
bands." In more then half the cases,
they do as Kent did: leave joint bank
accounts and insurance policies itttact;
leave the ar, prepay the tuition if the
children are attending a private school;
and write a note or letter of fatevrelL
With Goldfader's assistance, Mary filled
out a detailed dossier on Kent The
questions covered every conceivable as-
pect-hu background, schooling and
hobbies, his employment, financial and
military record. Was he a Ioner or a
joiaer, a talker or a listener? How was
he dressed the day he left? What did he
take? What did he leave? What were
his preferences in music, books and
food; in movies, art and sports? On and
on the questions went-probing, seek-
ing, explonng-until finally Mary lapaed
into weary silence.
"Are you sure you haven't forgotten
something?"persisted Goldfader.
"Sometinxs the most trifling detail may
be the clue that will lead us to your
husband."
Mary hesitated. "My mother stupecta
Kent ran off with another woman."
"I doubt it" said Goldfader.
His asaurance was bwd on the Snd-
ings of psychiautista and marriage coun-
selors, as well as Tracets' records. These
reveal that lea than one percent of the
"good htubands" who run away do so
because of an afSair. What the majority
think they want is symbolic bachelor-
hood.
"How long do you think it will take
to find my husband?" Mary asked anx-
iously.
"Not long;' said Goldfader, "Uniess
he's very much different from the oth-
er:"
Goldfader knew the common run-
away pattern of "good husbands." East-
ernees generally head for California or
Florida; Westenters for Chicago or New
York. Some resume their old occup-
tions. Others turn to new jobs. But the
majority drift along sittilessly, usually
financed by their credit cards, and thus
rarely hiding their ldentiGes.
To almost al1 sooner or Iater, comes
a sinking seme of disilltuionmenl, and
with it the realiaation that in their
flight from reality they have succeeded
only in cutting adrift the basic anchors
of their lives-their vrives and children.
They yearn to go home. But a sense of
shame and misguided vanity forbids it
They feel they can save face only If
they are sought after and found.
Finding Kent however, peoved more
difficult than Goldfader had expected.
Most deserting husbands leave a sub-
conscious trail: telephone t:alls to
friends, an occasional postcard to wives
or children, credit-card receipta that
they know will be mailed to their
homes. Kent had carefully avoided all
this. And when a nationwide check of
hotels and hospitals, morgues and po-
lirr records failed to turn up a eluo.
Croldfader asked Mary to rome In
and see him a4ain. He was convinced
now that she had n"lected to tell him
sumething important
Together they went over Mary's atory
eqain The details ahe geve were the
same. But her viewpoint was somewhat
different Wlth the passage of time had
come a little more insight "Everything
was out of focus with us." said Mary.
"And I probably was as much to blame
as Kent. Without really meaning to. I
guesa I made him feel that getting that
/ob promotion was vitat" She bit her
lip. "But good as he waa t this job, I
don't think it wea tba kind of work
Kent really liked."
"What did be like?" Inquired Gold-
fader.
"We hadn't dfatuased tt for yeats.'
said Mary. "But when we were fitst
married Kent worked for a publishing
firm. He changed his occupation be-
cause it meant a lot more money. But
he often used to say he was aorry he
changad."
"These are the details you forgot to
trll me befoee.' said Goldfader. "It
gives new direction to our search."
Within two days, the search waa over.
The direction was south-Iess than two
milrs froen Goldfader's of9ce. Kent had
never left New York. He had taken
part-time job with a ie::book publisher
and was living In a small. restdenti.i
eriea, an interrtSQESSSii~!}!aT-"
tion that specializes in 6nding miuinR
penona. Here she was interviewed by
Edward Goldfader, the firni s vice presi-
dent, who looks like an Olympic weight
- -------- atter
l~eut7 ~L tes cT~'_ OJ,gS
Sa 15
~~aPVea~ fiarfia $ev,jhati tri~ ~a~J~
M1 5`CdtlcM1~, n~~ty hap~ta {al~ ear `° ac~ t
Ilt4 Secll ~LS~ a~t.
~ p
hea a ars °t t° I``~ nte" e
~aM1~ ye fl SJtOC~ ectable
cr`` U rz'Q
0
0 et 100,
0v
t
1227

I
I
Defe;ndr.atts L.:.`~ibit A.'Z
hotel. Goldfader telephoned Mary the information. "The
rest is up to you." he told her.
"But what should I do?" she asked in crotehuion. "What
should I say to him?"
They were questions Coldfader had been answering for
ycare. "Stay away from your husband's office. Try to meet
him privately. Don't berate him. Don't accuse him. What-
cver you do. let him maintain his diitnity."
At fir.t, the meeting between Mary and Kent was
mrained am they souqht to hide their uncertainty behind
politc, stilted phrases. But only for a few moments. Then
the barrier was swept away by the realization of their.
mutual pain. Still perplexed by the forces that had sepa-
rated them, they knew only that they needed and wanted
each other.
Like so many other "good huabutds," Kent had been
waiting to be found. Ninety percent of the "good husbands"
who run away are reunited with their wives. And less
than one percent ever run away again.
But the statistics do not tell the whole story. "Far too
often." says Dr. Lnwood, "they mean nothing more than
tha: the husband and wife have managed to achieve a do-
mestic truee. Bowing to what they mistakenly believe is
the inevitable, they go on living a life of inner turmoil as
they struggle to maintain an outward peace."
For many others, however, the shock of separation brings
a new awareness. They realize that their reconciliation
has solved nothing, that the forces that had threatened
their marriage still exist-and that their lives could be
happier if they learned to recognize these forces and cope
with them realistically.
Such was the caae of Mary and Kent Convinced that not
only their own future but the future of their children de-
pended on it, they decided to work out their problems
with the aid af a marriage rnunselor. What they learned
could serve as a guide to help other couples escape a sim-
ilar ordeal.
L Never forget that communication is the lifeline of
marriage. When honest communication breaks down, it
sets both partners adrift, so that the words they speak of-
ten become only vague signale, disaatrously mis+under-
stood.
2. Don't lose sight of basic values. They may change as
the family grows and the husband progresses in his ca-
reer. But try to dutinguish what is really important and
what othera believe is important. Otherwise the pursuit of
happiness may turn into nothing more than the pursuit of
status symbols.
3. Remember that a "good husband's" greatest virtuc-
and, pandoxically, his greatest fault-is his compulsion to
give his family "everythinq." Hushand and wife must
learn when to eay "No." This will automatically avoid a
welter of complications, ranging from job problems to a
monss of debt.
4. Beat in mind that relatives are ncither oracles nor---
soothsayen. Evaluate their advicv on its merits.
5. Expect to have occasional disagreements. All marrieti
couples do. But neither partner is ever nlwove in the riqht
Yet, even when you are positive the other is wrons: never
assault his dignity as a person.
The so-<alled "good husband" is a modcrn phenomenon,
reflecting the intricate prensures under which we live. But
by following these few simple rules of behavior he and
his wife might be able to put these pressures into per-
spective. Recognixinet their problems will heighten their
recognition of each othe-anrl les,xn the danger that hid-
den forces will disrupt their lives.
1223
I
WALL aragrr Joutol
"My wife has disappeared. May I speak to the
leatst efficient member of your staff?"
" 1 just want him back for about 10 minutes."
sam.'cn~cx~ms~w~ncri~
J'WI I I tnltpPW:rCrrYtrrWICrTt0r.t3:urrtnrPrrfrtu.ttWaurW1 trc6tfnu~:f~uu:clP.W:LUGWI I I t1YI
fiI I 1L6tntCl.tt11 IttltLLnCttPltL Q
_Wt
~
= TRACERS COMPANY OF AMERICA - O
- _
-
513 MADISON AVENUE NEW YORK, N. Y. 10022
_ Specialisfs in finding#the missing all over the world sinc. 1924 S_
_
iJltl~l'IINlipfd:pFrWipW,AI,I~I:Ntpthpl;ll
I[I:LLLGW:plpl:flippplNOG:f.I:1.I~I:PWW~LIllipppp4G11pM711711:GCi411iI:pW
17IG4LU4pNGpN14~tWWJlppptlW Wp~i
V 1
