Lorillard
Cigarette Excise Tax Factsheet California
Fields
- Alias
- 03676162/03676175
- Master ID
- 03675660/6240
- 03675669-5672 Memorandum to State Activities Policy Committee From the Tobacco Institute Executive Committee
- 03675676 Support of Federal Regulations Division (and Other National Projects)by State Activities Division
- 03675677-5678 Federal Labeling Legislation 830000
- 03675679-5681 Contacts Federal Labeling Legislation 830000
- 03675682-5685 Contacts Federal Excise Tax 820000
- 03675686-5694 Tobacco Action Network Mobilizations
- 03675695-5696
- 03675697 Report on Directives From 830304 State Activities Policy Committee
- 03675698-5705 Minutes of the State Activities Policy Committee of the Tobacco Institute
- 03675706-5710 1. Tobacco Action Network Membership Levels
- 03675711-5712 2. Tobacco Action Network Mobilization Guidelines
- 03675713-5714 3. Tobacco Action Network Communications
- 03675715 4. Tobacco Action Network Survey Proposal
- 03675716-5720 Tan Survey
- 03675721-5728 5. Tobacco Action Network Retiree Letter
- 03675722 Memorandum
- 03675729-5743 6. Alliances and Coalitions Supplier/Subsidary Program
- 03675744-5749 Alliances and Coalitions National, Regional and State Summary
- 03675750-5768 8. Political Action Committees
- 03675769-5770 Consumer Tax Alliance
- 03675772 Memorandum to the State Activities Policy Committee From the Tobacco Institute Executive Committee
- 03675774 Memorandum to the State Activities Policy Committee From the Tobacco Institute Executive Committee
- 03675779 Memorandum
- 03675780-5801 Tobacco Issues in California A Report of the California Task Force on Tobacco Issues
- 03675802 Memorandum
- 03675803-5810 Dup of Id 03675698-5705
- 03675811-5815 9. Task Force Report
- 03675819-5832 Smoking in the Workplace
- 03675833 Iowa Lobbyist
- 03675834 Memorandum
- 03675835
- 03675836
- 03675837
- 03675838-5840
- 03675841-5842
- 03675843-5844
- 03675845-5846
- 03675847-5848
- 03675849-5854 830304 State Activities Policy Committee Meeting
- 03675855-5856
- 03675857
- 03675858-5859
- 03675860 Proposed Agenda State Activities Policy Committee 830304
- 03675861-5870 Exhibit 1 Tan Review Orc Recommendations - TI Implementation
- 03675872
- 03675873-5874
- 03675875-5883 Dup of Id 03675861-5870
- 03675884 Exhibit II 830000 Recommendations for Tan
- 03675885-5899 Exhibit III Mobilizations Tobacco Action Network
- 03675900-5902 Exhibit IV Consumer Tax Alliance A Proposal
- 03675949-5950
- 03675953
- 03675954-5955
- 03675956-5960 State Activities Policy Committee 830107 Meeting
- 03675961 State Altivities Policy Committee
- 03675962 New York Position Papers
- 03675963-6001 Tobacco Industry Positions on New York State Legislation
- 03676030-6032 State Activities Policy Committee Agenda
- 03676033 Los Alamos State Activities Policy Committee
- 03676034
- 03676035-6042 Los Alamos the Situation
- 03676043-6240 State Activities Policy Committee 830107 Meeting
- 03676045-6050 830000 Legislative Outlook Report From State Legislative Counsel
- 03676076-6077 Proposals and Staff Recommendations/ Use of Communications Strategies Against State Excise Tax Proposals
- 03676078-6084 Summary of Proposals Received Use of Communications Strategies Against State Cigarette Excise Tax Proposals in 830000
- 03676085-6101 Proposal Grassroots Lobbying in California for the Tobacco Institute
- 03676102-6126 the Tobacco Institute A Public Relations and Advertising Proposal
- 03676127-6138 Proposal Submitted by Executive Public Relations Corporation to the Tobacco Inst-Itute
- 03676139-6161 A Public Relations Program for the Tobacco Institute
- 03676197 Measure A No
- 03676198 Vote No
- 03676199 Unnecessary
- 03676200 Vote No on Measure A
- 03676201 4 Solid Reasons to Vote No on Measure A
- 03676202 Measure A Would Bring You
- 03676203 on Tuesday, 001102, Vote No on Measure A
- 03676204 Measure A Would
- 03676205-6215 820000 Elections Assessment by State Legislative Counsel
- 03676216-6221 820000 Elections Summary Report on Political Contributions
- 03676222-6229 820000 Elections State Government Trends
- 03676232-6236 Tan in the Tobacco States -NC/SC/Ga/Va/Wv/Tn/Ky
- 03676237-6240
Related Documents:
Document Images
G
0
CIGARETTE EXCISE TAX FACTSHEET
CALIFORNIA
C
NOVEMBER 1982 .

.TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. POTENTIAL TAX REVENUES AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
II. CALIFORNIA AND THE CIGARETTE TAX
III. BOOTLEGGING
IV. COMPARATIVE REVENUE
V. IMPACTS OF AN INCREASE IN THE CALIFORNIA CIGARETTE EXCISE TAX
VI. THE BURDEN OF EXISTING TAXES

. POTENTIAL TAX REVENUES AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In 1981, California grossed $280,626,000 in cigarette taxes
when the average retail price was 66.4 cents per pack.
During FY 1982, the average retail price increased
and state tax revenues from cigarettes slipped to
$279,207,165.1 On January 1, 1983, an eight-cent increase in
the Federal Excise Tax will hike cigarette prices still
further, and it is reasonable to expect sales to decline.
Any further increase in taxes at the state level would push
cigarette prices toward the level of $1.00 in California, a
price that may act as a psychological barrier which could
further dampen sales. Raising the tax rate inevitably
depresses sales, thereby causing revenues generated by the
increase to fall short of expectations. Compounding this
fact with expected consumer resistance to a $1.00 selling
price could very easily be adverse to the state in attempting
to generate additional revenue because the tax base can be
eroded by decreased sales.
For California specifically, cigarette demand will decline
2.5 percent for every 10 percent increase in real price,
according to a statistically unbiased econometric model.
Therefore, it can be expected that addition of the eight-cent
Federal Excise Tax increase to the current average retail
price on January 1 will lead to a decline in legitimate 1983
cigarette sales in California of about 94 million packs, even
though the number of smokers in the state will increase.
This decline will probably consist of an actual cutback
combined with increased smuggling. As a result, wholesalers'
and retailers' basic income would be cut by $13 million
in 1983.
1Revenue figures verified by Business Taxes Division,
California Board of Equalization.

II. CALIFORNIA AND THE CIGARETTE TAX
California has been taxing cigarettes since 1959. In that
period, the tax rate has climbed from three cents to ten
cents a pack today. To date, this tax has generated more
than $4.4 billion in gross.revenues for the state of
California.
In the fiscal year ending June 30, 1982, gross revenue from
the cigarette tax in the state amounted to $279 million, an
increase in revenue of more than 330 percent from 1960.
C

C
III. BOOTLEGGING
One indirect measure of bootlegging is the degree of
deviation of a state's per capita cigarette sales from the
U.S. average. States losing sales through bootlegging would
be expected to have per capita consumption below the national
average, whereas states which are the source of the illegal
cigarettes are expected to have per capita figures ranging
above the norm. Data for 1982 show that overall per capita
consumption in California is 115.4 packs. The U.S. average
is 133.1 packs.
According to a report produced by the Advisory Commission on
Intergovernmental Relations, and updated by the Federal
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, California lost an
estimated $19.9 million in cigarette revenues through
bootlegging, most likely smuggling from Mexico, in 1979.
This loss represents an estimated 4.4% of total cigarette tax
revenues for the state for that year.
Any further tax increase would depress legal sales in
California and would lead to increases in bootlegging and
further losses in expected.revenue. In other states where
high cigarette taxes exist, the criminal element has become
involved. If California were to raise its tax on cigarettes,
the state could probably expect a bootlegging problem of
major proportions.
~

TABLE I
CALIFORNIA AND SURROUNDING STATES, CIGARETTE TAX DATA, 1982
Cigarette
Sales State
Total Tax
1982
State Tax Rate Tax Per Pack Difference
Oregon 19.4 * None 19.0¢ +4.0~
Nevada 10.0 4~ 14.0 -1.0
Arizona 13.0 3 16.0 +1.0
California 10.0 5¢ 15.0
1982
State Tax-Paid Sales Per Capita Difference
Oregon 135.3 packs +19.9 packs
Nevada 165.1 +49.7
Arizona 113.5 - 1.9
California 115.4
* Tax rate raised from 9¢ in June 1982.

TABLE II
a, since
ional
jed here
.LECTED SALES AND GROSS RECEIPTS TAX REVENUE, 1981
Percent of Total f their
Tax Revenue (000) State Revenue 4.0
)nal
1980- 1981 1980 1981
~
:1s
$ 854,185
$ 839,317
4.4%
4.1% below
3e taxes
: 446,262 460,447 2.3 2.2 ily 31.0
:s 269,044 283,898 1.4 1.4 of
: Bev 138,902 141,752 0.7 0.7 seem to
:ls 126,306 133,288 0.6 0.7 ie for
iral Mark
ient et
35,844
46,248
0.2
0.2
:ilities 19,028 23,805 0.1 0.1
)n ~xes,
.cuZture Dept.
14,781
15,143
0.1
0.1
: U.S. Bureau of the Census, State Government Tax
)ns in 1981.

_____Y._____IMPACTS OF AN INCREASE IN THE CALIFORNIA CIGARETTE EXCISE TAX
\
Higher cigarette taxes will have effects on those persons
directly involved in the tobacco industry in California, and
on those indirectly involved such as convenience store
operators and small retailers.
Higher cigarette taxes and the resulting decline in the
purchase of tax-paid cigarettes will also reduce state
revenue from other sources, such as the general sales tax,
corporate income tax, and the individual income tax. For
example, cigarettes are traffic-builders for the state's
43,943 retail establishments which sell cigarettes. When
people reduce purchases of cigarettes, or turn to bootlegged
cigarettes, the revenue derived from the sales and profits of.
other products suffers as in-store traffic declines. In
addition to retailers, California has 216 primary tobacco
wholesalers and 95 other large grocers, drug and
miscellaneous wholesalers who handle cigarettes across the
state.
Decreased consumption due to a higher cigarette tax rate will
affect supermarkets and convenience stores as well.
According to the September 1982 issue of Supermarket
Business, tobacco products account for'14.83 percent of all
non-food'sales in the United States. Forty-four percent of
the cigarettes sold for domestic consumption are sold in
supermarkets. Those cigarettes and other tobacco products
account for 3.51 percent of all supermarket sales. In
convenience stores, excluding gasoline sales, cigarettes are
the number one product sold. Tobacco products comprise 16.1
percent of the gross profit dollars of convenience stores,
according to Convenience Store News (June 14, 1981).

VI. THE BURDEN OF EXSITING TAXES
The California cigarette tax is already a regressive and
inequitable tax. The cigarette tax discriminates against the
more than six million residents of the state who smoke, but
the tax falls most heavily on thos4 least able to afford it.
Because the percentage of income devoted to buying cigarettes
falls as income rises, California cigarette taxes are already
levied at higher effective rates on the disadvantgaed and
those on fixed incomes than on the more affluent. Any
increase in the current tax rate will add to the tax burden
on the lower income groups and will contribute further to the
overall regressivity of the California tax structure.
In 1981, 25 percent of what California smokers paid for a
pack of cigarettes went to the Federal and state governments
in the form of taxes. For a family.with two pack-a-day
smokers, the following chart illustrates the burden of
cigarette taxes in California as they fall on different
income levels at the current rate. (See Table III).
Sixteen percent of California families have an average buying
income of less than $8,000 per year. It is these families
who will suffer the most from an increase in the cigarette
tax rate. A family with an income below the poverty level oi
$5,000 per year with two pack-a-day smokers pays almost five
times as much of its income for the pleasure of smoking as
does a more affluent family making $25,000 a year.
In addition, for those elderly California residents living on
a fixed income, any increase in the California cigarette tax
rate may take away this last affordable pleasure.

Median household effective buying income in California is
$23,018 per year. Under the current tax the average
household with two smokers is required to pay $167.90 in
taxes on cigarettes a year for the pleasure of smoking. On
January 1, 1983, when the Federal Excise Tax hike of eight
cents per pack goes into effect, this same family will pay
$226.30 in taxes for its cigarettes.
~
