Jump to:

Lorillard

C.T.R.

Date: 17 Mar 1972
Length: 2 pages
03662857-03662858
Jump To Images
snapshot_lor 03662857-03662858

Fields

Type
REPT, OTHER REPORT
Master ID
03662523/3441

Related Documents:
Site
N14
Alias
03662857/03662858
Litigation
Stmn/Produced
Request
R1-037
Named Organization
Ctr, Council for Tobacco Research
Characteristic
MARG, MARGINALIA
Date Loaded
05 Jun 1998
Area
LEGAL DEPT FILE ROOM
UCSF Legacy ID
xbi71e00

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: xbi71e00
.% i .a FILE NO TE March 17, 1972 C.T'.R. ~ Recently, a proposal by the Lorillard Company stated "substantial l'ong-range and' specific planning of research activities by CTR is necessary to attempt to achieve specific, realizable goals. " This suggestion is specifically allied to a sQcond one, namely the need to '`.'identify those g~aps__in_ knowledge which existt in the areas of cancer, non-neoplastic pulmonary diseases and cardiovascular diseases as related' to smoking. " We wouldU certainly support these suggestions, but would, offer the view that more effective planning may be achievable if the phrase - identificat'ioni of the gaps in knowledge - could be more clearly related to the objectives governing the CTR program. It is our und'erstanding that the program may be broadly described as a"n indepth study of the total effects of smoking; this covers not only the implied medical hazards, but also the benefits which are associated with smoking. More specifically, we understand that this aim should be researched by CTR ini essentially three directions.: To define the effects of cigarette smoke on the hum_an system - where the. major concerni is Nrhole smoke and'biological systems withi physiological and pathological similarities to the human system. Certainly, the overriding principle is relevancy to, human experience. To define motivational meclianism and benefits of smoking - there is increasing need for a properly coordinated program into the reasons for smoking, and the complex interaction of subjective psychological factors andobjective pharmacological effect of smoking. To conceptualize and explore hypotheses, other than direct causation,, relative to the Smoking/FIeal'th problem byepidemiologicaly and other appropriate methods - to some extent, the id'ea of searching the gaps in knowledge could be fruitfully explored in at least three directions: (a) To establish, a respected foru m for critical evaluation of epidemiologic data, both past and future. (b) To study the random /non-randorn theory and properly assess the merits of the susceptible minority concept'. &'~~ ; l -z. 7. l 7''-
Page 2: xbi71e00
C = ( (c) Tod'~eterminetheextent that sources, other than: cigarette smoking, can contribute to those diseases which are claimed to be contributed to by cigarette smoke. It is our feeling that the Lorill'ard~ proposal will provide the greatest divid'end if applied within the above framework. Since only by having a clear picture of the directions of the CTR program as a wholle;, is it possible to improve the targeting and setting of priorities for three to five-year-long research programs.

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: