Lorillard
Tobacco Institute Newsletter
Fields
- Alias
- 03654082/03654087
- Master ID
- 03652627/4101
- 03652674
- 03652675-2676
- 03652679-2684 Naleo Update
- 03652732
- 03652746
- 03652770
- 03652780
- 03652783
- 03652792
- 03652793
- 03652794
- 03652795
- 03652796
- 03652797
- 03652799
- 03652802
- 03652803
- 03652811
- 03652812
- 03652813
- 03652814
- 03652815-2816
- 03653039-3216 A Study of the U.S. Tobacco Industrv's Economic Contribution to the Nation, Its Fi Fty States, and the District of Columbia 790000
- 03653397-3485 Report Summary A Study of the U.S. Tobacco Industry's Economic Contribution to the State and Counties of New York 790000
- 03653486 Tobacco Action Network Annual Report 780000
- 03653487 First Annual Report of Tobacco Action Network T.A.N.
- 03653488-3648 Memorandum
- 03653533-3536 781127 Meeting in Trenton, New Jersey Todiscuss Strategy Relating to the Public H Ealth Council Hearing on 781211
- 03653538 Final Tallies/Massachusetts Campaign
- 03653539-3544 Preliminary Report on the Campaign to Encourage A 'no' Vote on the Public Policy Question Concerning Smoking in Public Places Within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
- 03653545-3546 Untitled Document 03653545/3546
- 03653547 Untitled Document 03653547
- 03653548 Untitled Document 03653548
- 03653549 Untitled Document 03653549
- 03653550-3551 Untitled Document 03653550/3551
- 03653552 Police - Can They Enforce Smoking Prohibition Laws?
- 03653554-3557 Dade County Initiative/Status Report
- 03653558 Initiative Petition
- 03653649 Tobacco Institute Newsletter 730000 Thru750000
- 03653650-3657 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653658-3665 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653666-3673 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653673 British Renew Smoking - Cancer Debate
- 03653674-3681 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653682-3687 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653688-3691 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653692-3697 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653698-3703 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653704-3709 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653710-3717 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653718-3725 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653726-3733 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653734-3739 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653740-3747 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653748-3753 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653754-3759 Some Facts About Tobacco
- 03653760-3766 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653767-3772 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653773-3776 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653777-3782 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653783-3788 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653789-3796 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653797-3804 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653805-3812 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653813-3820 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653837-3843 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653844-3849 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653850-3851 Congressional Record - Tobacco
- 03653852-3855 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653856-3859 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653860-3867 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653868-3874 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653875-3882 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653883-3888 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653889-3892 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653893-3898 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653899-3902 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653903-3910 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653911-3914 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653915-3918 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653919-3922 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653923-3930 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653931-3934 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653937-3942 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653943-3946 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653947-3950 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653951-3958 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653959-3966 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653967-3974 Tobacco Institute Newsleter
- 03653975-3982 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653983-3990 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653991-3998 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653999-4006 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654007-4014 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654015-4022 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654023-4026 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654027-4030 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654031-4034 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654035-4040 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654041-4046 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654047-4052 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654053-4058 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654059-4064 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654065-4070 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654071-4076 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654077-4081 Congressional Record
- 03654084-4085 Congressional Record
- 03654088-4093 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654094-4101 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
Related Documents:
Document Images
nstitute NeWVslletteir
PREP'ARED FOR YOUR INFORMATION BYTNE INSTITUTE STAFF177S N.STREET; ..N.W.,.. WASHINGTON, D.O.:
20D06I 396-6M91'
Number 67
February 8!, 1973
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION turned down a petition from Ban¢haf"s Ac-
tion,on~Smokingiand Health,which hadirequested that FTC move im-
mediately to~ban "little cigar" broadcast,ads. In ainews release,
the Commission said any action on "little cigars" shouldibe handled
by;Congiress, not by Administration action under FTC at this time.
*** *'*~a *** **~
LATEICOUNT ON THE MAIL at the Civil Aeronautics Board!: Some 2500
members of the public want a complete smoking prohibition on air-
craf't; another 5,000 favor the CAB's proposed smoker-nonsmoker seg-
regation rule (whether they would inilight of the recent all-airline
voluntary segregation is a question),,, and about 1,35&oppose any CAB
rule.
REP. YOUNG (R-FLai.)', REINTRODUCED his "Nonsmokers,Relief
Act" onithe opening day of the 93rd Congress andlsaid:,
"The right not to smoke should be basic, yet each,day
nonsmoking Americans traveling on planes, trains, and
busses are forced to inhale noxious fi:mes comingifrom
smoking passengers." The bill requires smoker-segrega-
tion on all public conveyances.
THE FBI, POSTAL AUTHORITIES and top TAX' and LAW OFFICIALS'from seven
Eastern states met for a two-day conference late last month in an
effort to cut down cigarette smuggling by organized criminals., The
meeting,, held!in Albany, was'organized by New York state tax Commis-
sioner Norman Ga'11man at Gov. Rockefeller's diirecti~on. Accordingi
to GalTman, smuggling has cost his state an estimated $85 million
in tax revenues.
The Chicago Tribune editorial that highly praised the tobacco i~ndus-
try:'s Harvardiresearch grant (Newsletter, 66) was reprinted in the
Baltimore Sun.

-2
"THERE IS A DISTINCT SUSPICION," said the Columbus Dis-
~a~ in,an editorial, "that the eight tobacco firms
sponsoring the Harvard study believe they cannot be hurt
additionally by claims against the hazards of smoking.
Thus the findings of the researchers may mitigate the
role of:smoking in damagingihealth...Such a research,
project cannot help but uncover more medically signilfi-
cant data and the tobacco firms are,to be commendedide-
spite what anyone may read into their intentions."'
The,Spriingfieldl,, Mass., Union also commented on the!Har-
vard project: "What the five-year study proposes is to
clarify the relative impact of various enuironmental'
factors, as well as smoking, on susceptibility to the
diseases. With the prestige of Harvard Medical School
behind it, the outcome should be significant, but unlikely
to produce great change in the nation's smoking habits."
*~~ *** **~.
EMBROILED OVER A SMOKING BAN PLEA in the state house, Nebraska legis-
lators have added the question of proper attire to the debate and
the LincolniStar is apparently fed up with,ths situation. "The smok-
ing controversy," the Star saidlin an editorial, "is probably the
least important of those in which, the Legislature should,be ernbroiled..
From the standpoint of the surgeonigeneral's warning,, it,would be up:
to the individual lawmaker to decide whether he wants tolprotect his
healthi. And as cavernous as the chamber is,, smoke dissipates fast
enoughinot to offend the nonaddict. Nor can the question of dignity
seriously be tied to tobacco and dress shirts and ties., The Legis-
lature should be grown up enough,not to have to enforce a dress
code on,itseTf."
MEA:NWHILE A,NO-SMOKING RESOLUTION WAS DEFEATED by the
Bellevue, Nebr. city council after a dentist/councilman
said he didn't believe a minority should control the
air others breathe. The resolution said smoking,does
not conform with "proper dignity and decorum" in the
council chambers.
The Calif. Democratic State Central Committee VOTED TO ABOLISH "smoke-
filled" rooms. Members voted1433-284 to prohibit cigarette, cigar
and pipe smoking indoors at Committee meetings, and urged the legiis-
lature to ban smoking in public places.
Madison, Wisc., City Council also jained the legislative
"ban" wagon and on a 12-10 vote disallowed smoking in
council chambers with al$25 fine for violiation of'the
rules. ALSO IN THE MIDWEST, the Iowa Senate voted' 28-2q,,
and':the House 54-411,, to continue to permit smoking during
sessions.

(Not'prrnQed adGvaernmentexpense)'
ilJllited Staces
ofA'merica'
PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF' TIdEI 92 d CONGRESS;, SECOND SESSION
BPEECHBYREPRESENTATIVE,
DAVID E! $ATI'ERF'IPsLD ILI
. OF
EION. W. C. (DAN') DANIEL
a~, vnicnvu..
~ IN TIIE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Wednesd¢y, Oetober18; 1972
Mn DANIEL of Virginia: Mr. Speaker,
recentiytheHonorableDAVm E. Sa'rTER-
>lrIhl.D II7, who so ably represents Vii-
ginia'S Third District in this body, ar]-
dressedtheCorporation Center forSci-
Sci-
entific Research Relative to Tobacco-
Identifled, for fairly obvious; reasons as;
CORESTA/TCRA-at a Jointconference held in Williamsburg, Va.
This was a fitting location for such a
meeting, since the Vii'ginfaColony intro-
dilced tobacco to, Europe, and an apt
e:holce: of speaker, since Representative
SexrERFlEin shares with other Members
who represent tobacco-growingand proc-
essitlg districts a~ grave concern for the
abuse-possibly undeserved-which has
consistently been heaped on this impor-
tantilld{tstry;, - - -
Instead of; concentrating his remarlds
on ttieeconomlc impactof thisagricul-
tural commodity, which 4s sizable, Can-
gZE55mansASTERFIELnidj5Cll59ed at length
the growingbody of',apinion which is be-
ginning to have second thouglits'~. about
the medicalimpact ofcigarette smoking.
Mn S;trraR'r1El:b strikes to the heart of
the problem and throws'out a challenge
to his audien¢e early, in his; statement
when hesays:
The truth of the matter f6 that'. the polit-
1ca1 controversy~ exists ~beeause there are vast
gape In our knowledge about smoking and i
healthand that theexistence~.oLthesegaps
haa~~.beendenied fortoo longby those who
have anonscientiacstake~~.ln attacking~..to-
bacco: Makemo m1.9takeaboutit, well.mten-
ttoned forces; are at work throughoutt2ie
world to impose a~guiltyverdictupon smak-
ing-Wlthoutdueprocese of aclence:
Since Mr. SArTExeIECa's statement and
the testimony by experts atthe ~~. time of
hearings on the conques'~.t of'. cancer bill
have not received as wide distribution as
have the claims~~. of other experts who
seem bentl on Outlawingcigarettes, I in.
clude his entirestatementinthe RECOwn
at this'~. point, so that M'embersof the
Congre'ss may~ benefit from this other'~
side of the story:',
$PEECH'. BTRrpaS9CMArr- DAVin E.
8drrmrre[.o III
am pleased to,Joln with Dr: Hahn and
Isr'. &Iedmansegg Inwelcomingyou to this
Joint Conference of CORESTA and TCRC.
ItlagoodtohaveyouherelnWffilamsburg dealingwiththelssueafsmokingandhealth.
where theearlyrootaofourNationtookhold., I', orilywtsht:hls fact could somehow make
- Williamsburg holds'.. a special meaning 1tawayintothegenerel'massmediaandilato
formeaealegtelator:forltwas~here,ur1e19; publlcdlscusslon.Buttheotistacleseregreat,
thattheHouseof Burgesseeof'Vlrglnia; our' I realise:They have to do w1ththe babltei
ffrstrepresentatlvelegislatlvebody; wascon- andpreJpdicea ofthe press~ credlbilityand
vened. Ibad the rare privllegeot~serving In with so-called news values, mcludmg thei
that body; now called the klrginia~ General preferred treatment oftenglventliose wbo
A'ssembly, which lathe! oldest contmuouwattack zather thantothose whomustdefend
leglstativebodyinthenewwor7d. suchattacka.. ItisslgniBlcantthatthtaconlerencebringe
Nevertheless;greater obstacles thanthese,
together representatlves from~ mdustry~ heve given wayto hoaest me'n arllling to
academl8 andgovernment. Iam encouraged e=presstheir honest dissent. SOenaeln the
by the opportunity1t provdd-for' enllght- marketplace of ldeas-aoientllic, onpolltlcal-enedi
communlcatlon bet¢aeenthese sectors have never been an Instrument of change.
ofoursoelety--communlcationwhich must After all', the wallsofdericho dldinotcometir nurtured 1f'ttie
great tobacco lndustryot tumbling down until the Ram's horn bLew,
thls world Is toflourish. loud and:flear:
Dr. Wakeham orfginally suggested' that'I, In 1989; theCongresaofthei IInitedStates;
discuss the unIversality of tobacc+o and;oL after lengthy testimonyfrvm scientists on
course, the complexion ofthi9 audienoese~rves all i sides of the smoking and health con-
toremind one of'th'at unlversallty.Iam toldi traversy; went on reoord tuurgetheGovern-
that~more thaa45natlons ere represented bymeat tnldentlfy, aadc10se Lhegapsln~~ our
the partlcipants 1nt'his conferenoe:. Th'fakaawledge.I~commend all ofyou here totl®yfact alone
speaksmoreclearlythan Iicouldi for your eHorts tod0 so; Forw9thout, soltdever hope ta of the true
universal tmpact of , scientific truth, developed through good re- thetobaccaIndustrythrougLout
theworld. seaschand testedin thecruckbleof'.open~tlls-Thelanguageof tobacco is'unlversal, trade
cussloID,pollcymakers~willneverknowwhere
m~tobaeco~lb universallthe~~. objective oteca- togo. Andas~~.theold talmudlcsaytng~~.puts It,
"
'
nomlc, advancement in thisgreaV lndustry
1sunlversal.
However, theraisanothere1ement, lnthe
tobacco lndustry, an unwelcome elemeat;
whioh 19 equaily'universal innature'. ThatIe thethreat to the entite industry Implicit
In contravarsy over the relationshipbetween
smoking and haalttr:1'here Is no questlan
but that the tobacco lndustrysaa. whole
1lundersevereattack.
Althougtl ~that attack f.spresentlydltected'.
agamstthecigarette lndustry, Iam certain
that 1f It should ' succeed those who have
1nstlgated itw4l1 find awaytofocusa new
attack upontheremaining segments'. of the
tobacco industry, The, danger ofthle, 1s
seil-evSdent:
Thesmokingand health question1s bbth
apallticaland aaclentlflo controversy. Ult1+
mstedy;,I am hopeful that thebrlgHt; i1gbU
of scientific research will dissipate the polit-Icalfog that surrounds it.
The truth of th'ematter ts that the pollt-lcal controveirsy eaists'. because there are
vastgaps mour knowledge about smoking
and healthand that theesistence of. tbese
gaps',has been deniedlfor too long bythoee
who have a non-sclenttHe stake in attaek-
1ngtobacco. Make nomLAtake about1ti
well-lntentioned forcea areat workthrough-
out theworldto imposea guilty verdict upon
amaking-withoutdue procesaofeelence.
AS' alegislator, my major concern ls t'o prei-
vent~ a stampede that will condemn ~ tobac,co
on-less;than-onclustve evidence: Fortu-
nately, I amnotl alone. Manyof myfellow
Representatlvee ~ Jo1n me m~ this i strugglei to
prevent a non,selenttHcedictfrom forei-cdosing thesoarch, forsclentlhc truth.
I am encouraged bythefactthatmanyof'
you andi yourcolleagues: in the aclentificcommunlty havedeep reservations about the nature
ottheevtdence used againsttobacco:
I am aware of; the amount of private crlti-
clamleveled against much of the research
ffyou don
t knowwhere you are going, any~
road will take you thiere
Nearly, nlne! years ago with the issuance of:
theeurgeon general'sreport, one such roadl
wes selected, notknowingwhatcaused lung
cancer~ or other major dlseases, a politico-
medical arm of government launched I
AmerlcadOwn t(ie, antl-smokingroad!Tfiat
road clearly leade to the destructton~ of, the
tobacca ~Sndustry:
Itna'gme whatwouldhavehappenetl had
there been no actlve resistanee movement on
the po11t1cal i and scientific franta. The to- ~
tiacco mdustry mlght, well! have! vanished
Iromthe~ecenei. And it that had happened;,
Itwouldihave been toolate to apalogtza for~
tobacco's untimeily demLta when~ just this
year the ~.Natlonaal Academy of; Sciences pub- ~
lletied a massive study which charges thatair
pollution is the probable ; cause of lung
cancer.
This report Is a~model ofisctentlHC cautlun,
carefully ~avoldmg even the semblance of sen-
sati0nalistatement aimed atcreating panic
In thepublle~ As a scienti8c documentIt
stands In marked contrastto thevarlous sur.
geon geneiral's reports' on smoking and
health. Is 1t notsttangei that this,oHlclal has
Iailed to wage war on pollution as~. he has
upon cigarette emokmg, which ~. he elassified
as~. beingfar worsethan drug atld!cttonor
automobile accidents, or aicohollsm or air
pollution? I think It fs-nd frarJelg I
can-~
not~ understand It.
I would like to list a few~ major points
made by~theNational Academy, of Sfiemces:
panelists:.
They concluded that It 1s~ "likely" that
deaths ~ from lung-cancer would deerease'~. It
alt~ pollution were aubstantially, reduced in
urbanareaa.
'I4tey,said thatalthough'there ts,no "con-
c1us14e~~.prooC" thatair pollutioncauseslung
cancer~ the xeport pointa outAhat the disease
1& twice ascommon-ong city dwellers-
rural residents'~.and is~ most com+non ln ~ areas
494+403-31439 . '

2 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD! ;~ s, ,, , 1, ,(r~ii
of citles':where:generalHndustrlel polluttonis~~ documents~prepared~s by, tbe',surgeoni general.
worse'. The: same~evidence was~ in.existence..f3ome~.
Wh11e, theyy noted that: cl'garette~~e smoking of~. St has been~ around for years. Can the~
appears to be~~.a~majar.factor'1n the~mcwease', surgeonn general+-fndeed ca- the sclentl8'c
of'lung~eancer; they.potnted:mrt:that:smok-~ communlty-aHord~to be objeatlve'.regarding~
1ngg alone cannot~acoount for the dlferent: air.pollutlon'and~r not: be:ab)ectlve regarding~
rstes m urban and~ rural areae:. amoking?~ Cann the a01cda1'~ government atti-
Th'ey'repurted.that:studles of: Immlgrants~ -tbde be:dlfferentYtom..shytock'sR~-0an ecdea-~
have shown an~ Sncldence off lung'g cancer' tlflc' truth-like~ the'e quallty' of ini
~
somewhere:between the rates'.ln their' caun-~ strained?~~ Orr must iti not~ droppeth llke'.the~e
tiy~ of origin andd those Sn the ~ country, of gentle'e ralns~ from heaven hlnpartlallyy on all
destlnatlon.. The; alderr they ~ are'~, when' they those below?' .
migrate, the cl'oser'~r thedr' lung' aancer rates Pertiaps,~ distance from' the'e battle may be
are to'o their'home countr6es..In some ~cases the secret of objectivity, Iibave~, observed~thati
where the:llrng cancer~~rate~waa much higher~ ~~ when~ tobacco: Se'. the'~ subject of hearings or'
ini tbee country~of'' origlnl.rates' among~ mI-~ ~discuss7on, many~ emfnent~ sclentists and
granta~~ have: deereased.d aigaiacantl"veni
though~ thelrr cigarette~.e smoking lncr:eased,,
thepanelmid~. ~ ..
They.reported'that:°Sn'no: in.wance has ex-~
posure to a apecl8'c polycyclic azomatlci by-
drocarbon rmchh as benzo(a)pyrene~, been'
provedd to have eansed.canoerd In man."..
.. Benzo'~(a)pysene fe', a common~ingred'Sent'.
ef ~~ polluted~ alrr and; totiaccoo smoke'~. It ~ has
been.cited year~after.year'1n'surgeon gen-
eral's reporte' ae'~s a~ prlmee suapect.t causingg
eancer.. in smokeas: And this bas~ been done
despite two'~piecee': of', evidence whlch~ er'e~fn
conflict ~ w'ithh that; ~conclusion.. ~ _'- -~
~ Flrst;, over' iSA00M times's mare benzo(a)-
pyrene ~.Is released Into the ambient air by all
sources of: lndustrial ipollution thanby, burn~
ing',all the ~. clga'.rette: tobacco produced :.ln the'.
IIhlted Statea'. . ~
6econd, and'~ perhaps more Important', . re-
search search c'onducted by'the. Ameriean Cancer'~
Society baa's vlttuallyy exonerated the aub-~
stance- as'.a euspect. T1tie~ AC9~S studied ~8,000
roofing workers;.for example, who: breathe,
heated'~ fumes's o4~~f tar containing-'200~. tlmes'~
more benzo(a)pyreae~ than the maximum
levels ln~a lafge'. Industrial city, orthe ~equiv-
alent of 706' clgarettes, a' day:,. These~ ex-
posed' workera amazingly~had no greater.ln-~
cldence ~. of lung cancer ~~ than , the~ general
populatlon.
~ I'applaud the National Academy of Science
panellsts, even though they~ ~were'~e dealing
with air pollution~ I', am happy, to ~see that ~~
their objectivity and cautlon has.a "fall out"'
physicians find It:dlIDcult, to utter any,etate-
ment.that'~ could: be used in defense: of~to-
bacco. Yetj when ~ theyy are ~ deialing with ~ an-~
other subject, thia la no~ longer' the cme:
'. For' examp,le; , during hearings: on the ~: con-'
qvestlat:cancer bill m~3eptember' of.last year',
a former president' of~the'.AmerScan Cancer'
6oc:lety~boldly~stated~y that:cigarettes~cause'Q
lung~.cancerg i2p to thls'point, he had devoted
hls.testimony~to the~.need.to.flhd''.the esuse!
of eancer, the~~e problema'- mvolved~ and, the
need for ~ upwards: of. e' blillen doliarss too re-
search search the mystery; But: he', hadd no,doubt
when It came to ~cigarettes. , ~
r When ~ I'I challenged him to name the agent
Sn~ clgarettes~ which causes~ cancer,., be' ad-~
mitted it has~ never'r been dedned, end' con-~
tended~ that the', s6atistleail assocletion ~: wae ~
etrong',evidence ~to'~his mind.
~
7, Representatlve Pem: Rooxas,.thechairman
of:thef subcommittee; who~Qoes.not represent
tobacco growerethenalso asked'h'im to~c9ear
up his previous statement. "Either ~ we: do ~
know,~ ar.wei don't know." hee aa1d. ~~
-~ To which, th'Is.distinguis'hed physlclan. and
dedicated opponent of'f tobacca,repl'ed--and .
I quote~ hls's exact words'.: -
=~~ "2:thmk.we'.can,state now'that we~.do~.not~e know the.precise cause of malignant changes ~
within the cell:. We know'~ a~numbera of' re:-~
mote~~ cauaes established by, atatlsticsl i meth- ~
ods'.by'the'~correlatlmn between exposure to~o
the cause and thee oecurrence: , . . ~ ~ . .
"We. -know. a number of lhtermediate~e
causes,..pastlcularlp 1niexperlmental cancers'~i
effect, upon'n the . c4garette: controversy. But I'I one can take a human cell.lme', and expose Stt
wonderas many.of:youdowhy'such oJec:-to amonk'eyvirus and,get prafound',changees
tlvity and: caution did not reveal~ ltaelf'' mn ln the:cellIpattem.
' i I ' J ,. : . .. . ..
, I90~ 093~-31499~. c a-_):~~ ~,.. r rlv:.
r;
.1r..,t :s1Mf f;crr: ).:f°'-r;7. -a~~ r T t, ' >.r.~s 1 rtr.
, . .
c',,.:,.
, hl
t.~:A ..5'.. . O~'(
~
atlr.-rd
ern.t
;q ~.aa' 11o~Yca S ,lur... f sd :-~
~Irf~ :. o_ 1.D~ 3;da~~7at^} o~(fr t3 teWC! :~ .~ S ii~[c:~~. 1,1.~P°:
":...It f;:
'~.:; 1, ~. - , .
~ . 'a) x(~,i: Ft:... ~.:. f' , f.' . .
......
., .
~
~
IP.~ . .1 9. . . 11
.... -,> !_rvIJ.^.:::.eA .1I:SI.~'1.~
1
-~1........ If"r .;3e1".1]e)~~b".:L.
~ , .~.Ata . ,: T_IYn4-.:"f ..~.:1 . '>'.~1'SI : '..rlrI f'. ....
. :a:1t e?rn:r'o~ r. 11 ~ ry'.c.-1 ,i ^ lf - . ..rl~
l
,.
lh'!. -:F.2 te :t -_ . lar~ .
t
.
t~,.;t~ .. .. ...
.,..n' 1::Ir -:;1 L...,. . , ..
°But:I~would'agree'. with~you.,-that we do
not have full and precise~,knowledge of Jpstl
exactly~ what, causes.thei cancer.'" .
Sometimes, thee dYstance- of'f sheer mlles': (or~,
perhaps's anotherr cu1ture~~) ~ lentlb objectivity.
All tbingsi Chlliese:seem'to have.great, news'
value:these days:.eo lt,was.amusing~.to:read
a repart'i of' the trai a~~ medical dalega-
tlon visitmg~~g thla country~ from~ the: People's~
Republ lc: of .. ChShe. .
To a question about:cigarettes',, the Chlnese
specialist ln,lnternal~imedlcM1ne~.a~doctor lisu
Chia-Yu., who~is a:spoke man.for ~t1iee deSega-
tidn-and a~smoker hm>_self:-replled:. I', quote
from the~ news article which reported~, the~.
Incttlent:
"Well, I~I ycnow~smoking~w will: doo no ~oad'd
for' me, but not muchh harm:. I: consider,"
said. Bsu, "of'course', to:patlenfs I may,advlse.
hlm, "Don't ~~ smoke, , at least~ not. smoke too~o
much!'. But anyway,, Ii d'on't'~ think. itt does'~
much ~~harm to~ you 1f', you're ~healthy."
The fact ~~of this conference:and~'thls'e meet-~
ing: today, wSth ~the ~representatlces from~ our'
umversStles lndustryy and gosernment'~ 15 a
liopeft:l s'iga. It ~ mdlcates that't we can join
together to dlseuss'~. common, technical prob-~
lems~ sndi.hopefully,.to~ find answers's to: the
questlons clouding our~fut~e: @uestlo-that
anly ~ tbe~ scientlfie: communlty ~ can . resol vee
Questions whlch ~1t must resolve. ~~
And.so dn,this' cllmate-removed from the
battle so too speak-I', offeu' a challenge.
Why: don't~ you~ '~ an ofHclal liody-take
the' necessary, steps to'. complei all ~ the ~ data ,
that ~ does nott support the: aotl.smoking posl-~
tlon and translate 1t:lnto lnformatlon w'hlch
your representatlves'can use~ln,tbeir leglsla-~
tive: bodies.
As'.. Professer, Stafford Beer told,a.group~of'
Congressmen some~time'e ago; "We can~ gem-~
euate~ data~ Indefinitely; wei can eixchange data ,
forever;~,we~can store~data, retrleve;,and file,
them away;,but we have'.to~e ask.why:,The~k purpose ~ is's regulation . and that meana ~ trans:-
latlhg data.lnto dn'focmatlon. Ihformatlon 1ss
what changess us. .. .' .. .' .
- So far the. Snformatlan~ on. smokingg has's
been one-slded...It: Is'~now' time.to aedresa the ~.
balance:by.cnmpiling and actlvatlhg the ~data ~.
which.wlll present the others4de', of.the~.quea',
~
tion: You,bave neard.my challeage-I~.hope'
you. wtll respond.
.. . ..r. : 1~(
V I

-3-
Bangor, Maine, News editorially jeered at no-smoking "do-goodors"
and said: "'Suddenly those who would deny us the sovereign right of
contented self-destruction are organizing with a vigor and determi-
nation that is scary. No-smoking activism~is emerging as a national
vogue that is sweeping the country, not unlike a sky full of locusts.,
Slowly, but inexorably,, the no-smoking signs are becomingias common
as Tom Eagleton buttons and hula-hoops."'
Colorado Springs Gazette-Telegraph published a letter
from an avidianti~-smoker who cited a~multitudp of
studies condemning the use of tobacco. In aniunusuall
response, the editor quoted Rosenblatt, as cited in TI's
"Cigarette Controversy" booklet, who called the ciga-
rette smoking/lung cancer concept "a colossal blunder."
He had said that 20 years ago he "challenged the valid-
ity of the incrimination of cigarettes..." and "I still
find the conclusiions impossibie to reconcile with the
biologic behavior of,these diseases."
THE CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSN. prepared and releasedito media "as a
public service" allengthy piece on smoking and health. Reporting
nothing new, the story says smoking has bad effects oniunborn chil-
dren, on ch:ildren,whose parents smoke at home,, on women generally
(it notes that more ti.han: 3(%'' of U:.S'n women are, smokers):, and on, the
nonsmoker. "...When you succeed in breaking the habit," the story
concludes,, "you have provided a positive model to the younger chil-
dren in the household, who, in turn, will be less likely to become
smokers.'"
London Sluiday Times containedia lengthy story by a British
medical columnist on a,nicoti.ine chewing gum that alleg-
edly helps smokers quit cigarettes. According to the re-
port, smokers who average about &pack a day promptly cut
down to about one cigarette aiday if they chew the nico-
tine gum.
THIS DIDN'T TURN UP in the 1973 HEW smoking-h,eaLth,reportr "Emphy-
sema" declared WilTiamiA., Briscoe, M'.D., "is a normal aging phenom-
enon." That was his conclusion as co-chairman of an,emphysema sym-
posium two years ago, published last year with a grant from the:
Council for Tobacco Research.,
QUOTE FOR SPEECHWRITERS: Everyone knows that Pres.
Eisenhower warned~in his Jan. 17, 1961 farewell,address
of the "Ynilitary-industrial complex."' But his next
paragraphiwas to warn of the "danger that public policy
couldlitself become the captive of,a scientific-techno- C
W
~
logicall elite."
.~+
O
AFTER SURVEYING DRIVERS iniCalif.,, Wash. and Wisc., the Farmers~In-
surance Group, an L.A.-based company, concludedithat drivers who
T

-4-
smoke cigarettes are nearly twice as likely as nonsmokers to be in-
volved in an auto accident,while driving. The company is now,offer-
ing insurance reductions of up to $50 a year in 17'states to non-
smokers., Sem.: Moss had a Washingiton Post story reporting the new
rates inserted into the Congressional Record.,
NAT'L SAFETY'COUNCTL ASKED brewers and distillers to
label alcoholic beverage containers with a~cautionary
statement saying excessive drinking will impair dlriving,
ability. Cbuncil President H;oward Pyle said,in a state-
ment that 56,700 persons died in U.S. traffic accidents
last year and that alcohol was a factor in at least half
the deaths.
"The tobacco industry is rolling along but,it"s still gathering Moss"--
Sen. Moss,, that is, according to the Greensburg, Pa., Tribune-Review.
"Yesterday,"'the newspaper said in an editorial,, "Moss and his back-
ers wanted to censor cigarette,advertisements. Now it's little ci-
gars. Anditomorrow. Who knows?' As with,every other endeavor gov-
ernment,involves itself ini, censorship tends to expand both its au-
thority and:its scope. Carried very far in the field,of advertise-
ment, government,censorship could cripple the free: press by depriv-
ing it of aivital source,of revenue."
**~ **~ *** ~**
AT TI'S 15TH ANNUAL MEETING,, its Board,of Directors elected Louis.
F'. Bantle of U.SI. Tobacco to Board membership, and to the Executive.
Committee, replacing,Louis A. Bantle who retired. Tributes were
paid to Bantle and other retirees: Addison Yeaman~of B&W, veteran
of service on the Committee of,Counsel, and,Edtaard RaQland, vice
president of The Institute since its foundling; and to the late
Robert Walker,, chief executive of American Brands.
Reappointed,chairmen of major committees were Jack:
Roemer (RJR), Counsel; Charles Wade (RJR), Communica-
tions, and John,Murphy (L&M), Budget. Officers re-
elected inclluded,Horace Kornegay, president,, andiMr.
Murphy, Treasurer.
**~ *** *** ~~*
COLUMNIST BOB SYLVESTER wrote in the New York:Daily News of'a friend's
response when he gets in a taxi with a no-smoking sign: He tells the
driver he,"s allergic to tipping.
###
GJ
.~.
~.
~~~J
