Lorillard
Tobacco Institute Newsletter
Fields
- Alias
- 03653975/03653982
- Type
- NELE, NEWSLETTER
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT FILE ROOM
- Site
- N14
- Request
- R1-037
- Master ID
- 03652627/4101
Related Documents:- 03652674
- 03652675-2676
- 03652679-2684 Naleo Update
- 03652732
- 03652746
- 03652770
- 03652780
- 03652783
- 03652792
- 03652793
- 03652794
- 03652795
- 03652796
- 03652797
- 03652799
- 03652802
- 03652803
- 03652811
- 03652812
- 03652813
- 03652814
- 03652815-2816
- 03653039-3216 A Study of the U.S. Tobacco Industrv's Economic Contribution to the Nation, Its Fi Fty States, and the District of Columbia 790000
- 03653397-3485 Report Summary A Study of the U.S. Tobacco Industry's Economic Contribution to the State and Counties of New York 790000
- 03653486 Tobacco Action Network Annual Report 780000
- 03653487 First Annual Report of Tobacco Action Network T.A.N.
- 03653488-3648 Memorandum
- 03653533-3536 781127 Meeting in Trenton, New Jersey Todiscuss Strategy Relating to the Public H Ealth Council Hearing on 781211
- 03653538 Final Tallies/Massachusetts Campaign
- 03653539-3544 Preliminary Report on the Campaign to Encourage A 'no' Vote on the Public Policy Question Concerning Smoking in Public Places Within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
- 03653545-3546 Untitled Document 03653545/3546
- 03653547 Untitled Document 03653547
- 03653548 Untitled Document 03653548
- 03653549 Untitled Document 03653549
- 03653550-3551 Untitled Document 03653550/3551
- 03653552 Police - Can They Enforce Smoking Prohibition Laws?
- 03653554-3557 Dade County Initiative/Status Report
- 03653558 Initiative Petition
- 03653649 Tobacco Institute Newsletter 730000 Thru750000
- 03653650-3657 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653658-3665 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653666-3673 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653673 British Renew Smoking - Cancer Debate
- 03653674-3681 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653682-3687 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653688-3691 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653692-3697 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653698-3703 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653704-3709 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653710-3717 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653718-3725 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653726-3733 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653734-3739 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653740-3747 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653748-3753 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653754-3759 Some Facts About Tobacco
- 03653760-3766 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653767-3772 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653773-3776 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653777-3782 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653783-3788 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653789-3796 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653797-3804 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653805-3812 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653813-3820 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653837-3843 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653844-3849 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653850-3851 Congressional Record - Tobacco
- 03653852-3855 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653856-3859 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653860-3867 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653868-3874 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653875-3882 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653883-3888 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653889-3892 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653893-3898 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653899-3902 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653903-3910 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653911-3914 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653915-3918 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653919-3922 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653923-3930 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653931-3934 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653937-3942 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653943-3946 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653947-3950 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653951-3958 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653959-3966 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653967-3974 Tobacco Institute Newsleter
- 03653983-3990 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653991-3998 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653999-4006 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654007-4014 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654015-4022 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654023-4026 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654027-4030 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654031-4034 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654035-4040 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654041-4046 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654047-4052 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654053-4058 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654059-4064 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654065-4070 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654071-4076 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654077-4081 Congressional Record
- 03654082-4087 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654084-4085 Congressional Record
- 03654088-4093 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654094-4101 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- Author (Organization)
- TI, Tobacco Inst
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Characteristic
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- MINI, MINIMUM CODING
- UCSF Legacy ID
- pwj71e00
Document Images
nstitu!te NeWVsletter
PREPARED FOR YOUR INFORMATION BY THE INSTITUTE STAFF
1T781 N'. STREET~, N.W., WASHINGTON,' D.O. 20006: 29blM71'
Number 88
December 17, 1973
IT WAS' FRONT-PAGE'NEWS INiSTOCKHOLM':: Friberq, Cederlof and associates
disclosed mortality figures among 9,000 pairs of identical and fraternal.
Swedish twins'.up to 71 years old whom they've been studying for 11i years.
Their conclusions are that, all told!, higher death rates are associated
with greater smoking. But--among identical twins where one ils a smoker
and the other isni't, there's no di~fference in death rates. "The result,"
said one Swedi~sh,paper, "shows that smoking itself does not cause higher
rate of death,. "
London Times picked up the story, but there was no U.Spublicity,
despite the fact that,AMA's Archives of Environmental Health,
carried an 11-page report by the,researchers,, who acknow'ledged'.
AMA,ERF support for part of their work.
"GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES' are being urgedi to blow the whistle on airlines
that don't segregate smokers from non-smokers," said a UPI story about a
Civil Aeronautics Board memo to its 680 employees asking them to be "ob-
servers" for CAB when they travel by air, and to report to the Board''s
of'fice of consumer affairs on violations of the smoking rules, andlwhatt
action, if'any,, the crews took to stop the violations.
IRATE over the idea of using federal employees as "spies," N.C.
senior Sen. Ervin (D) asked, his colleagues on the Senate floor
if "these bureaucrats will openly announce their presence--orr
whether they will sneak about under cover, perhaps wearing red
wigs and filing top secret reports on the smokers of America..."
He asked the chairman'of the CAB to "call off this activity andd
to stick, to the purposes of the agency." At the end of the week,
CAB wiithdrew its employee instructions.
"IF SMOKING WERE PROHSBITED1IN ST., LOUIS,"'said the'story on the UPI
ticker from that city at 9~:24 a.m.,, "it would cut dbwn the levels of

-2-
carbon carbon monoxide in the air more than a redhction in automobile exhaustt
emissiion, according to a study..." Incredulous, TI staff queried UPIi
at St. Louis at 9:45 for detaiils., Response was that it was a miistake.
At 2:35 p.m. the wire carriedithe new ve:rsion: "A year-long study shows
that a high level of carbon monoxide in a person's blood' is caused more,
by whether he is a smoker or works in an industrial plant than by auto-
mobile emissions in the St. Louis area."
Baltimore Sun reported on a study with similar implications
presented at the American Heart Assn. annual meeting by Johns
Hopkins researchers who comparedlBaltimore auto emiissions and,
heart disease deaths.
***, *~* *** ***
UNRELIABILITY OF STATISTICS tak!en from death,certificates was underscored
iin alM'etropoliitan Life news release last month:
"...When chronic'respiratory diseases coexist with other serious
conditions, it is often difficult to determine which of the sev
eras cond'itions~present was the underlying cause of death. The
statisticians suggest that existing,coding practices may have
the effect of minimizing the danger of such:diseases which, in
one inquiry, were present at the time of death in nine times as
many cases as those in which,they were listed as the:primary
cause."
IN THE JOURNAL OF THEIFLORIDA MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONi,, Dade County Medical
Examiner Davis appealed to the state Diviision of Health to require that
"cigarette smoking"'be listed' onideath certificates when in the judgment
of the certifier it'is a factor in deathifromi"smoking related diseases."
M'eanwhilie, Davis said, doctors should do so on their own.
HERE, IN PART, iis what the Arkansas Gazette reportediabout a speech in
Little Rock by Roger Schmidt, exec., director of the National Interagency
Council on Smokingi &a: Healthr.
"He spoke at the invitation of the Arkansas Interagency Council,,
one of 45 satellites of the natiional organization..,.He saidlthe.
Council was attempting to fight the $9~billiion-a-year tobacco
industry with little capital of its own. The Council's annual
$;45',000 budget comes from a number of the 33' anti-smoking agen-
cies--such as the Lung and Heart Associations--th,at comprise
it.,..He toTdlthe group to:push for state legisllation...similar
to one at New York under which smokers are required,to pay a
higher tax on,cigarettes with a high tar and nicotine content.,
He said.the law had 'brought flack from the tobacco industry'
which is a sure-fire way of telling if antii-smoking programs
are effective."
LAST SEPTEMBER,, Sen., Helms (R-N.C.) delivered a major, speech inithe Senate
on the folly of so-called "tar" and nicotine taxes on cigarettes. TI: has

-3-
completed personal mailing of reprints to each governor, and to every
member of the llegislature:s in 47 states.,
HARVARD'S SELTZ'ER', earlier this year in the: New England Journal
of Medicine, used'.Do111"s data to show that while British doctors'
smoking was lessening,, their heart disease mortality rose.
Other scientists subsequently quarreled' wi~th him in the NEJ
letters columns, and liast'month he replied, explaining further
the statistics, and' concluded: "Unless these conflicts in the
data are satisfactorily dliisproved'or reconciled, the current
enthusilasmifor cigarette smoking as almajor riisk factor in
coronary heart,disease may become an outstandli~ng fallacy of our
era. "'
MEANWHILE, Seltzer told UPI that refuting a,statement from the Public
Health Service or the American Heart Assn. "is like attacki~ng motherhood."'
S'elltzer said, "The young fellows are afraid to make a study -- afraid of
their jobs..,.Why should the Public,Heallth Service be any more infallible
than the Justice Department?"'
LUTHER TERRY'spoke in Denver on "Smokingiand Health--Ten Years
Later", claimed that between 250,000 and 350,000 Americans will
die prematurely this year because of smoking,, and'called for a
new push:to prohibit all cigarette adbertising.
IDENTIFYING BANZHAF as the person "who initiated the legal moves that 1',~1`1_
eventually forcedicigarette ads off broadcast media," Ad Age reported
that he is contemplating legal action against cigarette billboard ads,
"coTlecting photos of billboards in locations where they are seen by chil-
dren." U.S. Tobacco Journal warned in an editoriall that "he be taken
seriously."
MICH'IGAN'HEART'ASSN. has published--and Sencer who, as director
of HEW's Center for Disease Control is Horn's boss, is pushing
its distributilon--a leaflet titled "W'arning: High Blood Pressure
Is Hazardous to Your Health." It says overwei~ght, diabetes or
"excessive" smoking can increase the:risk of strokes, but thatt
untreated high blood pressure is "the,biggest,, singile cause."'
NASSAU ACADEMY OF MEDIC'INEI, Garden City, Long Island, sponsored a Cancer
Preventive Workshop where teenagers cou:Td'view a ten, minute antismoking
fi~Tm that pictured,what Newsday called "the charred lungs of a cancer
patient"'and other "gruesome" scenes of disease victims.
WESTERN MICHIGAN elements of the American,Lung Assn., have broken away and,
are making their own,"Christmas Seal" fund drive in a wide midwestern area,
according to the Lansing State Journal. A spokesmanifo:r the "disaffiliiated
organizations" was quoted as sayingithat ALA has lost touch with community
needs and has become more concerned with its owni"superstructure_" He
said the national organization is removing itself'from direct indlivid'ua1l
service programs, adding, "We have a deep feeling that if you,raise funds

-4-
for special things, you should use them to help people wi~th those spe-
cific problems."'
MEANWHILE,, here is an excerp.t from ALA's newest annual report
showing how ALA's propaganda efforts have proliferated:,
Against Smoking. The, Associations throughout the coun-
try took:part in a variety of educational and other activities; for
example, the C'onnecticut Association published a guide, for stu+
dent leaders of'a school anti-smoking campaign; it was sched=
uled for republishing by National... . Smoking Education Week
in January 1973 was a time of action~ carried out in collabora-
tion with the National Interagency Council on Smoking,andl
Health and its: member organizations; for example, a legislative
briefing for members of Congress was held'in Washing(on: ...
Smoking cessation clinics were held in many places; for exam-
ple, bpy the Telephone Pioneers of America, with Associatiom
help and materials. ... Association people met with the Amerii
can College of ChesrPhysicians and other agencies to work out:
ideas on how physicians and nurses could help patients who:
ought to stop smoking.
Public EdUeation.'"Ten Million Women Have Quit Smok-
ing;' a NationallAssociation leaflet' in newspaper:format, was
distributed in over:three-qparters of'amillion copies in its first
six months. ..."As You Live You~Breathe,'," a picture booklet,
went, to a qpartenr of a milliomn children.... Three of' twelve
monthly health posters and leaflets, a new edition of "Cigarette
Smoking; The Facts," radio and tvmateriais and health columns
for newspapers all were on the anti4smoking theme.... Asida
fromth'ree, taped rad io programs and ian appearance by ahe med-
ical director on the Mike Douglas show, the three television
networks, NBC, CBS and ABC; used National Association anti-
smoking spots 127 times; CBS andIABC'radio used anti-smok-
ing messages 95' times. Local stations used, many more suchh
items, furnished them by, state and local Associations.
CORRECTION: The last issue of the Newsletter included a story about ALA's
fund raising,expenses. It said that in a recent year ALA used $4a,74!1,0000
to raiise $42,335,000. The correct figure should be $10,14'8,000 to raise
$42,335,,000.,
DORN,long ago found a,risk, of smokers (amongiU.S'. veterans) having a
stroke 1.33 times higher than for nonsmokers!; Dolll and H,illl said the ri.sk
was 11.,12',times higher among British,smokiingidoctors; the:Fr:amingham study
put it at three times higher for smoking men~. Now Nomura,, a Johns Hopkins
epidemiollog,ist has reported to the AmerilcaniHeart Assn:., that he has found
the relative risk lower for smokers after studying the population,of a,
Maryland county. But Medical Tribune, a free newspaper sent to alll phy-
siciians:, conceded little in!its headline on the Nomura story. It read:
"Stroke's Link WithiSmoking Held Minimal."
WASHSNGTON!U., researchers Kuo, Rosai and' Tilllack reported' in
International Journal of Cancer on their work to date in iso-
lating glycoprotein from breast cancer tissue, but said'"whether
there is a breast-cancer-specific antigen associated with the
cell membrane remains to be demonstr,ated."' The report acknowl-
edged'suppor:t from U.S. tobacco companies and growers and the
Public HealthiService.
NEW'YORK,TIMES', LONDON'SUNDAY'TIMES and other papers gave readers details
af:new research showing that persons with high,blood levels of an enzyme
ca111edIAHH may be predisposed to lung cancer.. The factor can be determined
by a complicated blooditest. Commenting onithe study, Sir Rich,ard' Doll
said: "If these results are confirmed, about 50 per cent of people cann
smoke withirelative,impunity but the rest must be most careful not too
C.
W
Ln
®
smoke at all. "' Z..7
"NATTONAL COMMISSION ON~EGG NUTRITION" began buying nearly full, pages of
~
newspaper space: (see illustration on p.5:) to tell readers "there is

-5-
ftlestml and the
Egg.
Ml/St2
hWhw mwaau'a. ~Ma'n ~
.a tf CnY
~
'lruien
.
btl N mY.bY 0/abh.1M.. n..wvW~eti.'n.airn~fieN
fOPwnw~crrvaw ~uaa~.piooca~y.~ m. sp ~ d.~..
lavcitl~ w ~v ~.ou~a nin.unM.ye ~.° Kbrii°.`Oa1 N+
w.. [Nti.ae+un~i.mu. E.cuu..
IY.+C.cK'+nwtl~. u. Cu~a~ry Gtt. d W~w~xi~~ bi . Iw ~
~J ~d.PtYAqIN,MTM.Nnn ~~Cn.Nn.JN~M
fbd-.+ar.c...nH.n.Ya
b G...M B4N.'m..cieM1ruol.v~'w.N.T.F.n~
r.y.mo x..rcryrnneCa
]tl]'.mL'1'W'.m. e410.wy~un bu~mma'IV a..
~e. nrqNeY Nex
cq~'M.9MOr~lM ww p~.,..
Tr.Y.l.eM.ryae~rLMe'..MY.. w.Ibrq.q.M.
NATIqNWL LOMMdSSION ON IEGG~NWTRITION',
,.--N ..................-. --------
------------ r~r.-...w..... ~. C
------------ -----------
absolutely no scientific evidence that eating,eggs in any way increases:
the ri~sk of heart disease." New York Times said the ad's are inspired by
&one-fourth drop in per capita egg'consumptioniin the U.S. from'the WW2
peak. "Leading authorities on heart diseases and cholesterol"'said the
Times,, "have called the adls 'irresponsible," 'inaccurate' and a"gross
diistortionlof the facts."" It said that Action on Safety' & Hsalth,
(Banzhaf uses his ASH, acronym for that, too), "'is prepariingi to file a com-
plaint with the Federal Trade Commission, asserting that the ads are
'false,and'imisleadling.,'" Saide o~neadm
I
"'You"ve been meaning to start on that diet because youi're I f~
somewhat overweight but you are awfully fond of many foods 'I

you shoul ~E~ ArtB"5'm'okI~g ~.ybi3'know you 6 've up
cigarette but it is hard. And you probably ack
on drinki somewhat too. It sort of reminds you the old'
saw, 'Everything L like is either illegal, immoral or fattening"
--and makes you wonder what's next!" "What's pext" in the copy
iis eggs, andlthe ads tell readers that eatingAhem does not in-
~
crease chol te
o counts
r
A/.e ~.
C.amwa~zG
M'EANWH'ILEI, Nat'l Assn. of Broadcasters announced a new TV Code policy
pending,"final review" by Jan. 151, whi~ch,will require cigarette smokingi
andihigh blood pressure be referred to as CHD:"r:isk factors" in any com-
mercials which suggest that low-cholesterol oils and margiarines have
heallth,benefits..
**~,
~**
ON THE SMOKER/NONSMOKER ISSUE: emphis Cbmmercial Appeal supported a pro-
posal to segregate smokers at a oliseum i:that city andlsaid that "it
might be a good idea,just to ban smoki /at all coliseum events. That's
been done in theaters for years." : okane Spokesman Review printed a,
reader's letter which said in part:, "Public,establishments which refuse
to prohibit smoking in at least half their area should be deprived of
their 1'icenses to operate on the grounds that their continued'operation
constitutes a clear and present danger to the public health." ...An ASH
associate wrote the Knoxville News-Sentinel and said': "What we really
need are strong laws to require the separation of smokers from other pas-
sengers and provide penalties for those facilities whiichido not effectively
control smokers from harassiing other passengers."...Walnut Creek,, Calif.
Chamber of Commerce polledibus!inesses in,its town about a possiblie city
ordinance to ban smoking in public places~or to segregate smokers., With a
mixed response, the Chamber recommended that the city not enact an ordi-
nance:.
DAVIS, CALIF., well known in the antismoking community for i~ts
early move to segregate smokers, was the subject of'a roundup
story about the Locali legislation in the San Francisco Examiner-
Chronicle. A reporter interviewed several local business en-
trepreneu:rs,andifound varying reactions to Davis' ordinance to
ban smoking in cer:tai~n public places~. Now city councillmen are.
toyingiwith the idea of an all-out ban on smok,ing in public
places. Reaction by restaurant operators was not favorable.
GASP--GYoup Ag;asn,st Smoking,Pollution--held its first meeting last month
in,Fremont (suburban Oakland') Calif. A news story in the Oakliand'Tri-
bune,said: "If'youl're upset,or concerned about tobacco smoke in public
places, here's your chance to rally behind the flag of GASP."
A ONE-DAY ANTISM'OKI'NG CONFERENCE took,place at DePaul Hospital,,
St. Louis, as hospital personnel indicated they had se:nsed' the
"angry mood of nonsmokers who wanted' immediate action taken--
no: ifs, ands or butts~about it," according to the St. Louis
Post-Dispatch. The meeting was one of'three planned nati~onally

-7-
by the American College of Radiology to make hospital employees
aware of the allegedidangers of smoking and to seek bans on
smoking in hospitals throughout the country,, the: newspaper said.
"TRAINS PLANES, HOTELS, insurance companies and corporations hopped on
the no-smoking bandwagon in setti~ngiup segregated areas," said the Chi-
cago Tribune article reprinted in the Detroit Free Press. It,featured
ASH, described the Arizona segregation statute as:"ASH's greatest coup."
COMMENTING ON THE ARIZONA LAW which bans smoking in certain
public places without smoking facilities, the Ft. Wayne
Journal-Gazette said the "Arizona action points up a fact that
generally is known but seldom acted upon.. This is that the
great majority of the public doesn't smoke, andith:at smokers~'
'rights' at best are minority favors accorded by a tolerant
majority."
SMOKING WAS BANNED in the Miami Spri~ngs (Fla.) city council chamber after
the council's unanimous vote. An attempt at,a smoking ban last year hadi
failed.,
A St. Petersburg VFW,post advertised a"non-smokers room"'as a feature of
its weekly bingo game.
THE CLASSIFIED AD IN MS., magazine said, "Nonsmokers:: Fight
pulmonary rape!" It was signed by ASHi. If' youlanswered youu
received,a fund-raising appeal signed by, Banzhaf, several anti-
tobacco leaflets and a couple of'Congressional Record reprints
of speeches by smoking foes in Congress.
ASSOCIATED PRESS distributed aistory about how "Oak Ridge National Labora-
tories, one of the world's largest nuclear energy research institutions,
is putting its talents to work on determining just how hazardous smokingi
is to your health." It said that Michael Guerin,, "a group leader for
ORNL"s bio-organic analysis group," believes that "almost everything in
tobacco smoke i~s potentially hazardous." The story went on: "Guerin
said the laboratories had been keeping their smoke research activities
quiet because the researchers were concerned that it would be considered
a waste of the taxpayers' money." It quoted Guerin as saying that "for
every $10 spent for cig,are:ttes,, only one cent goes for smoking researcti."'
SMOKING'WAS SKIPPED OVER as a major causal factor imthe de-
velopment of Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) by participants at
a seminar conducted by the Epidemiology Branch of the National
Heart and Lung Institute and heldiat NIIH earlier this month.
TI covered the seminar and heard brief inention of cigarette
smoking as a possible causali factor in CHD but all the par-
ticipants agreed that stress was a more probable factor., Out-
spoken anthropologist Dr. Margaret Mead was there and said,
different,peoples suffer from what she called "population,
vulnerability" which may explain high U.S. CHD:death rates.

-8-
Science magazine saidlin an editorial that "about 30 percent of cancer
deaths of men in the United States are attributable to cigzrette,smoking."'
BRITISH MEDIA REPORTED:that Courtauldls h,as agreed to cease its test mar-
keting of "Planet," a cigarette made from a tobacco substitute (Newsletter
87)~. DaiL Mail medical correspondent John Stevenson saidlthe move has
"averted aicrisis of confidence in the 'oure' tobacco industrv."
Courtauld's had a voluntary agreement with the British~govt. to:test market.
"Planet" for only three weeks.
THE BRITISH Sec. of State for Social Services, Sir Keith Joseph,
toldlParliament that there will be a revised "tar"-nicotine liist
appearing early in 1974. Iniaddition,he said the Health Edu-
cation Council is producing a,new antismok,ing filmifor schooll
children and'will also' mount a campaign emphasizing the alleged
dangers of smoking during pregnancy. Sir Keith, also said that
next April a national conference willl open in Lond'on~, jpintly
organized by the Heal!th!Education Council and Action on Smoking
andlHeaDth,,, to focus on publicizing the alleged dangers of
smoking.
ENERGY SAVING coordinators were appointed by two major cigarette companies.
Tobacco Institute did its bit,, too--its offices were cooler and dimmer.
THE ENCLOSED GREEN LEAFLET "Smoker or Nonsmok:er?'" is now available in
quantity'from,The Tobacco Institute., Note that it invites readers to
write TI for a more detaiiled statement on the smoker/nonsmoker questionn
that refutes propaganda currently being circulated throughout,the nation
by tobacco adversaries.,
ALSO, COPIES OF TI'S NEWEST ADDITION to the "Tobacco History Series,"
Louisiana & Tobacco, are now available by contacting, The Institute.
###
I
r-~
