Lorillard
Tobacco Institute Newsletter
Fields
- Alias
- 03653903/03653910
- Type
- NELE, NEWSLETTER
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT FILE ROOM
- Site
- N14
- Request
- R1-037
- Master ID
- 03652627/4101
Related Documents:- 03652674
- 03652675-2676
- 03652679-2684 Naleo Update
- 03652732
- 03652746
- 03652770
- 03652780
- 03652783
- 03652792
- 03652793
- 03652794
- 03652795
- 03652796
- 03652797
- 03652799
- 03652802
- 03652803
- 03652811
- 03652812
- 03652813
- 03652814
- 03652815-2816
- 03653039-3216 A Study of the U.S. Tobacco Industrv's Economic Contribution to the Nation, Its Fi Fty States, and the District of Columbia 790000
- 03653397-3485 Report Summary A Study of the U.S. Tobacco Industry's Economic Contribution to the State and Counties of New York 790000
- 03653486 Tobacco Action Network Annual Report 780000
- 03653487 First Annual Report of Tobacco Action Network T.A.N.
- 03653488-3648 Memorandum
- 03653533-3536 781127 Meeting in Trenton, New Jersey Todiscuss Strategy Relating to the Public H Ealth Council Hearing on 781211
- 03653538 Final Tallies/Massachusetts Campaign
- 03653539-3544 Preliminary Report on the Campaign to Encourage A 'no' Vote on the Public Policy Question Concerning Smoking in Public Places Within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
- 03653545-3546 Untitled Document 03653545/3546
- 03653547 Untitled Document 03653547
- 03653548 Untitled Document 03653548
- 03653549 Untitled Document 03653549
- 03653550-3551 Untitled Document 03653550/3551
- 03653552 Police - Can They Enforce Smoking Prohibition Laws?
- 03653554-3557 Dade County Initiative/Status Report
- 03653558 Initiative Petition
- 03653649 Tobacco Institute Newsletter 730000 Thru750000
- 03653650-3657 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653658-3665 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653666-3673 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653673 British Renew Smoking - Cancer Debate
- 03653674-3681 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653682-3687 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653688-3691 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653692-3697 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653698-3703 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653704-3709 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653710-3717 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653718-3725 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653726-3733 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653734-3739 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653740-3747 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653748-3753 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653754-3759 Some Facts About Tobacco
- 03653760-3766 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653767-3772 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653773-3776 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653777-3782 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653783-3788 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653789-3796 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653797-3804 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653805-3812 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653813-3820 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653837-3843 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653844-3849 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653850-3851 Congressional Record - Tobacco
- 03653852-3855 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653856-3859 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653860-3867 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653868-3874 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653875-3882 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653883-3888 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653889-3892 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653893-3898 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653899-3902 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653911-3914 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653915-3918 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653919-3922 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653923-3930 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653931-3934 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653937-3942 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653943-3946 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653947-3950 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653951-3958 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653959-3966 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653967-3974 Tobacco Institute Newsleter
- 03653975-3982 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653983-3990 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653991-3998 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653999-4006 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654007-4014 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654015-4022 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654023-4026 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654027-4030 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654031-4034 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654035-4040 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654041-4046 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654047-4052 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654053-4058 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654059-4064 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654065-4070 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654071-4076 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654077-4081 Congressional Record
- 03654082-4087 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654084-4085 Congressional Record
- 03654088-4093 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654094-4101 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- Author (Organization)
- TI, Tobacco Inst
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Characteristic
- MINI, MINIMUM CODING
- UCSF Legacy ID
- dwj71e00
Document Images
Institute Newsletter
PREPAREO ~FOR ~Y'OUR'~ I NFORMATI ON BY THE: , INSTITUTE STAFF'
! T779 . KSTREET, NJW.', WASHINGTON, D.C. 20008296-849'II
Number 102
July 15',, 1974
I WASHINGTON H,EW'S LONG OVERDUE 1974 report to Congress,
I "The HealthiConsequences of Smoking,," was fi-
l
nally released as Sec. Weinberger asked Congress to set authority to
regulate'"tar" and nicotine content in cigarettes and "other ingredi-'
ents shown to be'injurious to'healthl."
In alstatement,that was picked up by most major newspapers,,,
TI President Kornegay said, "For the' first time in these annuaZl
reports HEW seems to have'shifted at least slightZy, from its usual one-
sided presentation'of scientific evidence about smoking and'heaZth.
The current docuznent'contains repeated:ref,erences to''studies either par-
tiaZ:Zy or wholly znconstistent"with the'"scientzfia judgment' expressed
a decade ago by an advisory, corsnit'tee whose report on smoking and'healt'h'd has been, until now,
accepted'by HEW without qualification. .On the
other hand; by, leaving the responsibility for drafti'ng, the report in
the hands'of,'the Clearinghouse for Smok'ing and'Heal'th; whose mission is
to'propagandize against tobacco, the'Department continues to produce a
document' misleading in important respects. St'ati!ng coneZusions from'
research, never intended by'its authors is j'ust one'inexcusabZ'e excarrpta'..
However, because t'h'is report does tend' to admit tliat' there are unanswered'
questions about smoking,, we hope it will help stimulate the research so
-badZy needed on the subject."'
MEANWHILE, Sen. Helms (R-N.C_) wrote President Nixon~andlasked that he
disassociate h,imself from,the Weinberger recommendation., "I do feeZ that
it' is i,irrportant' to bear in mind," Helms wrote the President, "that Congress,,
after exhaustive hearings..re,7.eeted similar proposals on the grounds that regu-
lation of cigarettes is the function of'the legislative branch, and:not a matter to
be delegated to any agency or department." (Single capies of the Report may
be'obtained by writing The National Clearinghouse for Smoking and
Health, Room 53'9,Westwood Tower, 5401 Westbard Ave., Bethesda, Md.,
20016. TI Newsletter will note when they are available through'the
Gov''t Printing Office.).
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMM'ISSIONi, as recently hinted in Ad-
vertilising'Age magazine (Newsletter 100), decided to limit
application of the "Fairness Doctrine" to broadcast view-
points or editoriaTs'rather than to product commercials thus
reversing its 1967 decision to apply the "Doctrine" to

i
broadcast cigarette ads. FCC'Chairman Wiley saidl,, "We
do:not believe that the fairness,doctrine provides an appropriate
vehicle for the correct'ion of false and mi'sleadting advertising!'
and that if an ad were found to be mi'~slead'ing the prop-
er course wouldl be "to ban it aZtogether, rather than to make its
claims subject of a broadcast debate."
AGAIN, AS LAST YEAR, Re~. Van Deerlin (D.-Caliif.,) tried to,knock, $,1!4!0',-
000 out of the Agriculture appropriation bill' in the House, which he
said would'be usedlas an act of'"hypocrisy"'to pay for advertising of
cigarettes in Austria and Thailand made with:American tobacco--putting
the U.S. in "the role of pusher to young Thais and young Austrians."
Reps. Natcher (D-Ky.)' and Taylor (D-N.C.) gave speeches justifying the
whole Department of Agriculture tobacco program economically, and Van
Deerlin's amendment was defeated on voice vote.
HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS' COMMITTEEin reporting out the annual HEW
money bill,, saild "There is evidence now. .. that susceptibility to
Zung cancer is:in part inherited: ." .,Work is in progress to perfect a
sirnpZe blood,test to detect these genetic differences."
SENATE SOON will debate setting up a Consumer Protection Agency,, de-
signed to intervene for "the public" in regulatory proceedings before
other agencies. Meanwhile, Sen. Mondalle (D-M,inn.) offered an amendtnenti
to provide financiing "private.consumer organizations"' which might also
want:to intervene. In support, he was "proud" to display in the Con-
gressional Record a letter from,Banzhaf, whom Mondale called "'expert
on private litigation in the public interest."
BANZHAF signed himself as,"professor,of law and legal acti-
vism." Neither he nor the senator mentioned that he heads
a potentially beneficiary organization--ASH. In fact,, he
may have derrogated the authority of his own outfit when he
stated,, arguing for multiple representations in regulatory
proc eedings,, " .I't is probabZy presumptious, for any individuaZ
private organization or government agency to presume to represent 'The
Public Int'erest' in any given proceeding."
THREE DAYS LA'TER, taking Banzhaf at hiis word, Sen~. Allen (D-Ala.) ar-
gued that the letter provided further cogent reasons that the CPA
wouldn't work out at all.
SEN. COOK (T2-Ky.) announced that he"s been assured by the
Federal Energy Administration that the tobacco industry will
receive 100% of its present energy requirements and that FEA.
"'realize(s) the importance of tobacco to your state and too
our economy as a whol'e."
FURNITURE MFRS. are faced with,possible Consumer Product Safety Commis-
sion regulation of uphollstery and bedding flammability. So:four of
their trade assns, petitioned: CPSC to ban sale of "any cigarette which
does not discontinue burning if the smoker does not drara on it for some period in
excess of one minute but less than Z0 minutes as determined by the ComPni'ssion,"'
Defending furniture, the assns.said cigarettes are "the prime ignition
source." The petition acknowledge&CPSC',''s recent turndown of "tar"-
nicotine regulation, claimed the agency does have authority to move
on the new front.

GOVT.,"s National Institute on Alcohol~ and Drug Abuse issued a,
new report which said' that heavy drinkers run alfar greater
risk of developing certain cancers thaninondrinkers and added
that heavy smoking combinedi with heavy drinkiingi multiiplies
the risk as:much as 15 times compared with those,who completely
abstain. Dr. Morris E. Chafetz~, director of NIADA, estimated
that the cost of alcoholi-related problems such as accidents,,
lost production, healthiand'mediical care runs in the area of
$25 billion yearly. (A 1966 NIH study pointed out that to-
bacco-related "probllems," comparable definitionally to those
mentioned in the new alcoholi report, cost an estimated $5.3'
billion yearlyY.
REP. MCKhY' (D-Utah), a Mormon, introduced a bill to set up smoking and
no-smoking space in aTl public interstate transportation, aSlleging di's-
comforts and' dangers for nonsmokers andlgiving no indication of'aware-
ness that his proposal is al~ready universalliy in effect.
TRACY WESTEN,identifying himself as attorney for "Public
Communication, Inc.," and'callingiit "a non-profit, public
interest law and media firm", petitioned the Federal Trade.
~Commission to enjoin L&M,from certainicurrent advertisiingi
'' and to require the company to pubZishi"corrective" ade.,
" Among other things he,callled cigiarette smoking "'an addic-
tion. ..as compelling for many smokers as heroin or mor-
phine", and charged that L&M ads.pictoriallly render the
accompanying heal~th:warnings "ineffective."
ANOTHER EMIGRE~: "As several associates have d'one, Gordon Zubrod, diirec-
tor of the treatment division of the National Cancer Instiitute., departs
to become director of one of the multi,-million-dollar, government-
financed Cancer Centers, at U. of Miami. Back in '65 he wrote that
cancer "controZ becomes feasible without proofof the exact nature of the carcinogen,
if one is certain of the set of'circumstances that invartiab'Zy,gives rise to cancer.
3uch,is the situation Lrith respect to cigarette smoking and Zung cancer.,",
NptVSM'OKER! ISSUE
AVIIIDO, U. of'Penn. pharmacologist who has
studied the worTd''s literature on effects of
tobacco smoke on nonsmokers, testifying for Calif. tobacco distribu-
tors before:a state:senate health committee on a smoking-restrictionn
bill similar to Arizona's: "As a scientist, I must seriously question govern-
mental action in matters ofpublic heaZth, (such as the proposed regulation) takenn
in recognized.absence of'reZialile supportive fact. It is my~concZusion that ciga-
re:tte:smoke as encountered in public pZaces does not represent a h'eaZth haaard to
the normal nonsmoker. "' (A "nonsmokers' bill of' rights" failed to pass in
the assembly. Other similar measures are pending in the senate).
LOS ANGELES city council's public health, welfare and envi-
ronment committee propos:edian ordinance to:segzegate smok-
ers in,many public:and'privately owned1buildings.
RIVERSIDE, Calif., board of'supervisors is pondering an ordinance pro-
posed by the city's county health d'ept., that would either ban smoking
in certain publi'c places or provide.machines to filter smoke from the
air.

-4-
I
CARMEL, Calif., city council banned smoking at its meetings',.
A local newspaper reported that the council noted that i~n
addition to being a health hazard, cigarettes were also burn-
ing holes in a new rug,and upholstered'chairs in the city hall.
FOND DU LAC,, Wisc., city, council briefly debated a proposal to ban smo-
ing in its chambers a:ndivoted it down. Insteadliit decided on a volun-
tary agreement to segregate smokers andlnonsmokers.
SUFFOLK COUNTY (Long Island) legislature tabledia tough
smoke-ban proposal when,the county attorney discovered a
legal defect. Possibility for reintroduction of the mea-
sure exiists.
DOCTORS attending a meeting of the Canadian Medical Assn.voted' by a
2-1 margin to ban smoking when they convene because "physicians shouldd
set examples of lifestyles promoting good health."
IN DADE COUNTY' (Miami) FLA., Commissioner Cain, pleased
_-:t, with the 8-01vote by his',colleagQes to outlaw smoking in
supermarkets, said he'll go for health estabIi~shments (in,
cluding doctors'offices) next, then for restaurants. The
M'iami' Herald reacted': "It is discrimination."
Later, the Heraldlpublished' seven citizen lietters, two of them raising.
Caim with Cain, the other five supportiing,him.
ENFORCEMENT: Some argue that unenforceable laws create
disrespect for laws and are therefore worse than none.
In Miami, in the wake of the supermarkets smoking ban,
a newspaper survey of store managers (who would have to
be the enforcers) was' reported: "Most. ..wh'o knew about the
new law don't'expect many probZems with it. But they apparentlyy
don't plan to take a hard Zi,ne on i't, either:n
PALM'.BEACH Post carried a UPI story reporting that St. Petersburg au-
thorities have arrested andifined five smokers smoking illegally--three
in supermarkets,, one in a hardware store and,the fifth an electri.ciann
working inithe rear of a store.
ALLERGIC? More frequently, the claim is made that tobac-
co smoke causes:am allergic reaction. Not so, says Cbhen,
aiChicago allergist, iniToday' s Health., Some persons, he
says, can get a stuffed!-up nose from air polliution, emo-
tional or temperature changes or smoke--but it's'a "non-
allergac" reaction.
AND:A SPOKESMAN, for the National Institute of Allergy and'Infectious
Diseases in Washington, in answer to a query, said it has no figure,
for "tobacco allergy" little evidence to warrant any stud'y of it, andi
althoughisome persons:react to a tobacco extract skin test because of
a protein element,, that disappears in combusion and isn't measurable
in smoke.
"Majority favors banning smoking in public places," said
the headline disclosing results of a poll taken by the,
Springfield Illinois State Register. Perhaps, but we'll
never know. The results were reported as "Yes,". 55%!, "No,"
47% and "Don't know or refused,"'3$'. That,adds to 105%'.

-5-
COUNTERPOIiNTS: Miriam Unger, who sounds like the kindlof smoker you'd'
like to meet, wrote inia Newsda article: ". ..Tabacco smokers don't hold
up candy stores or mug old la s in el'evators. Yet smokers are treated as pariahs
in every public place. ..As for legitimate theatres,in Manhatt'an; forget'it. Yow
can huddle under the marquee om the wiiui'-swept'sidewalk while the virtuous are in=
si:de burnishing their dental work with chocolate nut bars. Trains and'planes have
also segregated the hated smokers--probably in the worst' locations, although, ir¢
the case of the Long Island Railroad'it'.'s difficult to pinpoint where it might be
...Sbme of my best friends are nonsmokers--although I:wouldn't want'my daughter
to marry one. Nonsmokers fZood the 'Letters:to the Editor' columns with, totally
unsubstantiated claims that other people's smoking is injurious to their health. ..
I'pestered t3ie doctor further about'wYuzt percentage of the population suffered from
''smoker alZergy,' 'I've never encountered one in the course of my professional
career,,' he sazd. Just as I suspected 'I'm all'ergic to' has replaced''I don't
like' in the vocabularies of'many people."
MEDI',A
BEAUmIFUL DOWNTOWN BURBANK, the scene of:Tom
Snyder's NBC "Tomorrow Show," played host to
TI's Kloepfer,!UC of Penn.''sAviado,, ASHI's Banzhaf, Silver Hill Foun-
dation"s Tamarimand a Jack:Albert, director of a Smoke Watchers "clin-
ic" in Southern Calif. Snyder spent half of the show"s hour discussingg
quit-smokingiclinics with Tamarin and Albert paying particular atten-
tion to his own smoking habit (he went through a clinic but later took
up cigarettes again--he referred'to them as "coffin nails").
Banzhaf lauded his own plea to FCC to allow counter spots
o to run in light of ciigarette advertising. He calledlthe
move "a little l'etter which everybody, has come to love." Kloepfer,,
however, reminded him~ that FCC had just "junked its decision
...and:decided it was a very, bad idea:," (See story above),.
Aviado said he'd recently attended an ilnternati~onall scientific work:- .
shop to di~scuss whether or not cigarette smoke is harmful to the non-
smoker and that the sci~enti~sts found "there was no evidence at al2 that a
normal'person exposed to cigarette smoke is exposing himself to some sort of a
hazard'." . He further added that "all we! have is suggestive: information based
on measurements of carbon monoxide in the room,, and:if you excuni'ne these reports,
there is no~evidence for believing that there is a health hazard:"
_alkedlabout segregating smokers~. Kloepfer said the
Theg.t
operator of a restaurant should d'ecide whether to segre-
gate, not the,government. Banzhaf, as he's done in recent .
talk shows, complained that on commercial airline flights
"they run the dirty movies on the back of the plane,, so smokers get
to see the dirty,moviues. Us poor nonsmokers have to suffer with the
G-rated' stuff. n
.DESPITE ADECADE OF'WARNING', says George Gallup, there's been no sig-
nificant reductiomih the number of Americans who smoke. His new sur-
vey showed that.,4!a% of,American adults smoke cigarettes andithat the.
U.S. ranks 5th in percent of' smokers among five nations.surveyed.
(Canada, 52% ' smoke; West Germany, 47%; Great,Britain,, 4:6%; Switzer-
land, 41%). Gallup said the percentage of smokers is highest among
men,, those with a high school educationy, people under 50 and those in
the middle i~ncome group.

TI PRESIDENT KORNEGAY penned a guest editorial for U.S'. To-
bacco Journal on the nonsmoker issue. He said the industryy
is committed'to providing scientific truth and added:: "Ntrxnu-
facturers, members of The Tobacco Institute, are increasing their com-
mtitment to this task. We have begum to present scientific testimony
to match the emotional demonstrations of the tobacco foes at public
hearings on the nonsmoker question. ..But the job of combating con-
t'rived propaganda with common sense is so big that every, person rvith,
a pocketbook interest'and a perception of truth has to do part'of'it.
We can retain our pride in the worZ'd'''s best tabacco products and in
our industry's outstanding support of'no-strings smoking and heal'th
research. But that isn't enough. Tobacco foes have descended to the
Z'eveZ of buttons and:bumper stickers, to~letters to the editor and'
marches on,city hall. We must meet them,there."
NEW'YORK TIMES did another "roundup" story on the nonsmoker question!,,
overstatedithe Surgeon General's conclusions on the health aspect, and'
got a correcting letter fromiThe Tobacco Institute.
TRAN'S!WORLD AIRLINES, according to Ad Age, will air,com-,._
mercial advertising on its:in-flight channels. The maga-
zine said,TWA has indicated that it doesn't want ads for
cigarettes or competing air carriers. Other airlines are
reportedly "'exploring the idea," the ad' industry magazine
sa id'.
I
CLEARINGHOUSE Director Horn, at a Chicago news
PEIgPLE'
conference before addressing an AMA symposium
on coronary artery disease, said cigarette smoking causes twice as~many
fatal' heart attacks as lung cancer deaths in the U'.S. H'e said!studiess
indiicate that 2/3 of'heart attack deaths among men in the 45 to 4'9-year
oldlage bracket are chiefly caused by cigarette smoking. Horn also
said that per capita cigarette consumption is soon to return to its
1964 high of 4,100 cigarettes per year. He said smoking is increasing
among womeniand teenage girls while declining among men and' teen boys.
He estimated that 52 millioniAmericans are smokers, but stated that
were it not for the '64 Surgeon General's report, "We would have 70
million to 75 million smokers today."
AT AN IiNTERNATIONAL ANTI-POLLUTIiON CONFERENCE in Paris, two
cancer researchers said,that four of five human cancer-cases
are probably caused by the polluted',envi!ronment, according
to Reuters. Dr. L. Tomatis of the,International Cancer Re-
search Agency, Lyons, France, and S.S. Epsteinlof Case West-
ern Reserve U., Cleveland, noted a clear link between cancer
and the environment., Said Epstein: "There is now Z'ittZe doubt
that many chronic diseases, particularly cancer, are caused by environ-
mental pollutants."
"IT IS KIND' OF' IRONICAL, "' said' Terry in, a Minneapolis speech,, "to see
the tobacco industry advertising the virtue of:l'ow tar low nicotine
cigarettes. Every time it does so,, it affirms the basic contention:
that cigarettes are hazardous."
PROPSOTION:: Robert S. Pless, formerly corporate secretary,,
Larus &,Brother Co., Inc., tio president_

-7-
MORRIS FISHBEIN', one of the old-timers in American medicine, wrote in
& Medical World News editorial, "Practically all physicians now forbid smok,
i.ng for the nursing mother, not for fear that any of the toxic ingredients wiZZ pass
into her miZk, but because the ashes might drop into the baby's eyes."'
hSEARCH
ANOTHER TOBACCO-INDUSTRY-funded research pro-
gram was announced by UCLA noting that the
five-year, $1,.7 million project will study lung defense mechanisms and!
early detection and treatment of cancer. A joint statement noted the
industry belief that "this major new grant expands our support of'independent'
scientific research. It reaffirms our efforts over the past two decades to resolve
questions about smoking and health, in the only way possible -- by independent sci-
entific research.This new grant brings the industry commitment to nearly
$50~ milliom.
LONDON!BROADCASTINGICOMPANY broadcast an appeal by an In-
sti~tute of'Psychiatry researcher for twins and adults who
were adopted to identify themselves to help in a study of
whether the tendency to smoke may be inherited. She saidd
the study is sponsored by the "American Tobacco Council."
Council for Tobacco~Research in,N.Y. confirmed it has made
a grant to the Institute for the purpose.,
THIS SPRING, Feinsteiny the Yale epidemiologist, reported startling,
data showing that the greater the smoking history of a patient, the
more apt he is to be given tests which willl lead' to lung cancer diag-
nosis. Now the American Cancer Society has given an unconscious "push"
to that idea:: In its:journal,, CA, a New York thoracic surgeonladvises
colleagues to ga beyond just chett X-rays to seek lung cancer in "hi~gh-
risk patiients"--and by that he means only the smokers.
FORD MOTOR CO. began anieffort to coax 25 volunteer employ-
ees, identified'by a computer as heart-attack prone on the
,~ti,~basis of conventional "risk factors,," toichange their life-
styles, including smoking. Ford says it's a,possible fore-
i,runner for al!1 its 4,0001corporate hg., employees.
PERPLEXING: UPI, reported' that Dr. Ronald' Collins, a North Carolina
med'ical researcher, told the sixth:Pan-American Congress:on Rheumatic.
Diseases in Toronto that "art'nri'tis victims who smoke appear to su; fer more
., .,"
respiraiory`aiZ'ments than nansmoking arthritis vzctims or'nonarthritic smokers.
UPI said Collins could!not explain the assertion.,
DOES PARENTS' SMOKING cause respiratory ill!s in children?
Antismokers would have you believe so, but four years ago
Environmental Protection Agency researchers reported a
study of Memphis school children which said' no. Now British
Medical Journal has published a study of U.K. youngsters
which also says no:.
HEALT'H ORGANIDZATTiONS'
BIG'STORY about the American Cancer Society's
science writers" seminars--always a major
source of anti-tobacco "'news"--in a sales trade magazine,r focusing on
the 17th one which, was heldinear St. Augustine. Excerpts: ". ..Atways
takes place a week or so before the society's annual fund~raisi,ng drive. ..FZood
of news that' comes out' of the workshops has the entire country thinking, 'cancer:''at
G.:

-8-
r
,j,ust the time ACS launches its annual plea for research (sic) money., ..Week-Zong;
stay at the plush resort and country, club: ..invi'tat'ions are val'ued. ..ACS pays
all the expenses of'doctors who attend. . . Doctors consider their invitations an
honor. ..ACS science editor, AZ'Davis; works closeZy, with each doctor to create,
between,them, a clear, concise account of his work. Papers are then printed and'
synopsized'by editorial workers at ACS. ..ACS provided 4 Telex machines, 2:Xerox
Telecopiers and 6'phones;, plus dozens of typewriters in a press room. ..and a
tstudio' decorated to resemble a living room for tv interviews or filming." The:
story even explained that ACS gives reporters lists of questions to ask
doctors.
ACS ANNOUNCED a joint program with~the U.S. Civil Service
Commission, OTin Corporation and' Honeywell, Inc., for "can-
cer educati~on" among 2.6 million public:and 100,,0001corpor-
ate employees. "Smoking withdirawai clinics" to be included.
T
AXES
NEWSLETTER 100 REPORTED that N.Y. Dept. of Tax-
ation and Finance was using business envelopes
with an imprint urgiing citizens:to report cigarette bootleggiing. Now
the mayor's office is fol'Iowingisuit with this note next to the post-
mark: "Report Cigarette Smuggling To:: 22$-31391."
INDICTED: Four Brooklyn women, on charges of smuggling
four million cartons of'cigarettes into:NYC from North,
Carolina a year ago. BrookLyn"s district attorney told
the New York Times that the smuggled cigarettes cost the
;, state and' city over $9 million in unpaidl revenues,
FORE IGN
IN HONG KONG, a government ad hoc committee onn
cigarette smoking, released recommendations to
the government to deal with the smoking:-heaTthi question and invited
public comment. The committee noted it has already met with tobacco
industry representatives there and said it willi later make recommenda-
tions as to acceptance, modification or rejection of proposed measures.
The chairman of the committee stressed the fact that the gpvernment
has not yet formed a view on the proposals contained in the,report.
While recommending advertising restrictions, the committeee
suggested that taxes not be increasedion tobacco products
because a tax increase would not affect consumption. The
report also said, "It accepts that no evidence has been produced
to show that the inhalation of secondary, smoke contributes t'o the de-
veZopment of lung cancer but considers t'hat,, as a further discourage-
ment to smoking and because smoking in pubZic places undou3t'edZy
causes nuisance to nonsmokers it is appropriate on more general
grounds to consider whether further restraints are required."
THE'LAST'ISSUE of The Newsletter,, number 101, carried with it a copy of ,-~
"Some Facts!Akiout Tobacco."' Since then, TI staff has been made aware
of a typographical error on page one undpr the "Consumption"'headling. W
~
The,correct figure for snuff consumption last year is 25.6 million Vi
<< op und's,, not 6.6 million,as printed ini"Facts." All new press runs of C.:
the information sheet will include the correction.
4--
® I
###
