Lorillard
Tobacco Institute Newsletter
Fields
- Alias
- 03653777/03653782
- Type
- NELE, NEWSLETTER
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT FILE ROOM
- Site
- N14
- Request
- R1-037
- Master ID
- 03652627/4101
- 03652674
- 03652675-2676
- 03652679-2684 Naleo Update
- 03652732
- 03652746
- 03652770
- 03652780
- 03652783
- 03652792
- 03652793
- 03652794
- 03652795
- 03652796
- 03652797
- 03652799
- 03652802
- 03652803
- 03652811
- 03652812
- 03652813
- 03652814
- 03652815-2816
- 03653039-3216 A Study of the U.S. Tobacco Industrv's Economic Contribution to the Nation, Its Fi Fty States, and the District of Columbia 790000
- 03653397-3485 Report Summary A Study of the U.S. Tobacco Industry's Economic Contribution to the State and Counties of New York 790000
- 03653486 Tobacco Action Network Annual Report 780000
- 03653487 First Annual Report of Tobacco Action Network T.A.N.
- 03653488-3648 Memorandum
- 03653533-3536 781127 Meeting in Trenton, New Jersey Todiscuss Strategy Relating to the Public H Ealth Council Hearing on 781211
- 03653538 Final Tallies/Massachusetts Campaign
- 03653539-3544 Preliminary Report on the Campaign to Encourage A 'no' Vote on the Public Policy Question Concerning Smoking in Public Places Within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
- 03653545-3546 Untitled Document 03653545/3546
- 03653547 Untitled Document 03653547
- 03653548 Untitled Document 03653548
- 03653549 Untitled Document 03653549
- 03653550-3551 Untitled Document 03653550/3551
- 03653552 Police - Can They Enforce Smoking Prohibition Laws?
- 03653554-3557 Dade County Initiative/Status Report
- 03653558 Initiative Petition
- 03653649 Tobacco Institute Newsletter 730000 Thru750000
- 03653650-3657 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653658-3665 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653666-3673 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653673 British Renew Smoking - Cancer Debate
- 03653674-3681 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653682-3687 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653688-3691 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653692-3697 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653698-3703 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653704-3709 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653710-3717 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653718-3725 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653726-3733 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653734-3739 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653740-3747 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653748-3753 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653754-3759 Some Facts About Tobacco
- 03653760-3766 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653767-3772 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653773-3776 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653783-3788 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653789-3796 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653797-3804 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653805-3812 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653813-3820 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653837-3843 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653844-3849 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653850-3851 Congressional Record - Tobacco
- 03653852-3855 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653856-3859 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653860-3867 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653868-3874 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653875-3882 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653883-3888 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653889-3892 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653893-3898 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653899-3902 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653903-3910 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653911-3914 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653915-3918 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653919-3922 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653923-3930 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653931-3934 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653937-3942 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653943-3946 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653947-3950 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653951-3958 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653959-3966 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653967-3974 Tobacco Institute Newsleter
- 03653975-3982 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653983-3990 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653991-3998 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653999-4006 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654007-4014 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654015-4022 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654023-4026 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654027-4030 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654031-4034 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654035-4040 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654041-4046 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654047-4052 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654053-4058 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654059-4064 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654065-4070 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654071-4076 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654077-4081 Congressional Record
- 03654082-4087 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654084-4085 Congressional Record
- 03654088-4093 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654094-4101 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
Related Documents:
Document Images
PREPARED !YTHE INSTITUTE STAFF"TO INFORMI
THEI INDUSTRYOFNEWSWORTHYDEVELOPME'.NTS;
HEALTH ORGAW I ZAT I ONS
Number 124,
June 3, 1978'
THANK'S, JACK: It took little intuition to ap-
preciate several years ago that the well-organ,
ized and financed nonsmoker movement was designed to achieve what the
direct health scare hadh'tt Ending the social acceptability of tobacco.
Last month, Jack L. Hoffman, Portland attorney and incoming presid'ent
of the American Lung Assn.,, laid it out neatly in an interview with the'.
Oregonian:
"Probably the only way we can win a substantial reduction ((in smdking)),"
he was quoted as saying, "is if we can somehow make it' nonaccept'abZe
socially. This is what happened'to snuff and chewing tobacco. i'in,reaZ:Zy
enthusiastic about this approach...,.We thought the scare of medical sta-
tist'ics and'opinions ruoubd'produce a'major reduction. It didn't."'
A, JACKSONU'ILLE,, FLA.,, PAPER' reported that ALA "is eonsidering a Zeuasui!t
against the Tobacco Institute, according to Mrs. Jean Vanderslice, consultant for the
FZorida Lung Association." The story says ALA objects to TI"s leaflet, "True?
__False?...Tobacco Facts." The paper quoted Dr. Joseph B. Stocklen of ALA
as saying the leaflet contains "distortions'and'm~.srepresentatzons tit appar-
ent'Zy reflect anxiety over successes achi'eved by organizations working for federal,,
state and local regulations to protect nonsmokers' interests."
TEACHING KIT for junior high school sci~ence classes preparedd
by the American Cancer Society have two lessons: 1. What
Is Cancer? 2. What Is The Relationship Between Smoking and
Cancer? Among stated objectives of the package: "to name cer-
tain factors.,..associ'ated with eancer such'as air pollution, impure faod,,
and smoking.,..°
MEDIA.
NEW SCIENTIST, a leading British magazine which
recognizes there's a controversy over whether
smoking causes illness, ran a short editorial in which a Dr. Donald.
Gould gave U.K. cigarette manufacturers hellifor failing to give in to
sweeping govt, self-regulatory demands. Two weeks later it published.

-2-
a letter from a Red Bank, N.J., man, Frederik Pohl, who said it's
true" that smoking causes illness.
POHL describes himself' in Who"s Who as 55, an author and' ed-
itor, a prize-winning science fiction writer and a member of
the New York Academy of Sciences. Here's what he wrote in~
New Scientistt
i
Sir,-I must protest against the stagger.
ingly sanctimonious tone of' your anti-
cigarette e'ditoriall (Comment, 17 April,,
p ll5). I am sure there are many evils's
im the world, and if' Dr: Donald Goullil
f'eels himself obliged to spank us alll
soundly and send us off to bed to make,
us better personsI'. Udo nosupposeI. cann
stop him. But' I' wonder that he limits;
himself to cidarettes. My cigarette may
endanger, my healtii;, but it'i is hardly
likely to liee morethan iaminor annoy.,
ancetoyou.; while:your:liquorande petrol,,
in the process of killing you, stand a fair
chance,of taking me along. I do concedee
the annoyance. But there too; other
people's indulgence: in driving', and, in
drinking, both separately and incom-bLnation, has cause,d' me a fair share of'
that commodity, ranging, from a brokenn
wrist when a drunken dt6vcr lost control
and' hit' a car~ in which I was a passenger
through any, number ofl killed' pets and
damaged property down to the: party
guest who vomits: all over my living'
room. Ii can only wander at the selec-
tivity of Dr Gould's passions.
lIe whines that the British agarettee
manufacturers resist printing on the
packet flaps the words "Danger: aga;
rettes cause lung cancer, bronchitis,
heart'disease:'" I do nott know what
reason the manuf'acturrrss give,, but. I
canthinkof'one. The: sta.tement iss nott
true. Itt iscertainly so that'.t they may beacoutributinG factor in somee circum.
.
stances, and perhaps even, a significant
one, but the poor fool who trusts the
implications, of'thef siatemc.nt_. DrGaultl.
endorses and hopes to avoid' a runny
nose or a cough forever by ref'raining,
from dgarettess is . outt of luck.
I hold no brief' for cigarette manufac-
turers, or for advertising,of any sortl But
I:like Dr Savonarola Gould even less.
Frederik: Pohl'
"b
KNIGHT F'EATURES~SYNDICATE article addressing subjject of accidents among
the retirement age group stated: "If'you're a smoker, you may' feel' smug in
the knomledge you have'Zasted this long without getting cancer;, heart disease, or
the other ailments the'surgeon general says can come from smoking. But, the acci-
dent'experts say the odds of being felled by smoke or being roasted alive increase
dramatically as a smoker gets older."
AN ARTIiCLE' in the Journal of the American Medical Assn,. by
Dr. Rauscher, director of the National Cancer Institute,,con-
tained this passage: "At present, the types'of cancer that ean'be
directZ'y reZated'to knoren carcinogenic exposures are (1) Zung in its
relation to cigarette smoke and certain other inhalation hazards (par-
ticuZarZy'asbestos, chromates, and'radioactiue materials); (2) skin, as
it relates to a variety of crude tar products and radiation; (,3) bladder,
in relation to aromatic canines and their derivati'ves;, (4) leukemias, in
reZation to radioactive materials; and (5) mesotheliomas,, as they relate
t'o asbestos. Recent research',has pinpointed the common plastic'feedstock,
vinyl chlorti;de as a cause of angiosarcoma of'the: liver in,mark'ers inn
certain chemical plants."'
PICK UP THE JUNE' ESQUIRE. You'll fiindlon p. 14',5 aidelightful piece,.
"In Praise of Smoking," by a New Havenisurgeon andlreguliar contributor,
Richard Selizer. Sample:: "Let no meddlesome man caution me against the extrav-
agance, the ,1nz~uriousness, of tbbaceo."'
DENVER PAPE'RS'reported that a152-year-oldiex-employee of a
Dow Chemical uranium processing, plant has lung cancer and'ils
before the Colo. Workman"s Compensation Boardiclaiming inad-
equate on,the-job protection from radiation. He''s also al
cigarette smoker, the papers saidi.

-3-
FIVE-YEAR AD BAN on cigarette advertising dropped by Better Homes &
Gardens. Turn-about based omeconomics, Ad Ace reported!.
LONG EDITORIAL DISCOURSE on tobacco in the Freeport (Tex.)
Brazosport Facts includedi: "...the limited bans like the Houston
ordinance, and the disapproval of a growing majority of non-smokers, may
gradually take the pleasure out' of smoking and ereat'e a general social
pressure for non smoking."
COLUMNSST' for the Flint (Mich. )' Journal says: "7 hope there is, some activist
nicotine fiend out'there,who will get cracking and form a group to protect the inter-
ests of smokers. These nonsmokers could get so powerful that one day they'd have us
all'up before firing,squads., And not allow the traditional courtesy of a last ciga-
rette,on grounds that it is harmful to our health."
HEADLINE in Los Angeles Times: "Texas House Bans Smoking!But
Not Guns."'
PHILOSOPHICAL POINT in a Richmond News Leader editorialz "No government
has any legitimate business!in attempting to forcividuaZs to be "safe''through
statutes and laws. And the reason for that is as fundament'al as it is clear: No
government knows better than the indivtidual what is in the inda:vidual's best inter-
est. Generally; government tends to be on it's firmest ground when,it seeks to pro-
tect the individual'from ot'hers;, similarly; government tends to be on its weakest
ground when ti't seeks to protect an individual from hiinsel'f: "
FOREIGN
TAR AND NICOTINE TABLES for 109 brands of ciga-
rettes issued by the Department of Health andi
Social Security in England showedlaverage tar yield' had been reduced
by about a tenth since,testing began three years ago.,
The Department also said that in the future it would display
a new health warning: "Danger: cigarettes cause lung~cancer,,
bronchitis, heart disease."
Posters and leaflets to be distributed to doctors, dentists,, chemists
and other health centers will carry the advice: "Stop smoking, but if youu
cannot, reduce the risk by smokzng a brand of cigarettes in a lower tar group~thann
you use at present; amoke fewer eigare:ttes and'take fewer puffs; db not inhale; leave
a longer stub;; and'remove the cigarette from your mouth between puffs."
TOBACCO1TAX INCREASE has resultedlin "millibns'of smokers"
cutting down or stopping smoking, according to the.London Daily
Express. A spokesman of a manufacturer is quoted, "Sales for
the industry as a whole have dropped by between,1A and 15 per
cent." The Guardian says the situation is temporary an&such
fa11s in demand level out,within six months.
"NO,SMOKING" BAN~, also according to the Dai~l Express, at Wallingford
town hall, Oxon,, is,to be lifted because bookings for social functions
dropped.
rybNSW1OkER' ISSUE
SMOKING BAN BILLS advanced in both Illinois
(Newslietter 120) where a bill was favorably, re-
ported by a Senate committee and Rhode Islandi (Newsletter 1122) where
the state Senate approvedia bill and sent it to the House.

-4-
IN CALIFORNIA: Sharp exchanges between Orange County Board
of Supervisors members and the audience punctuated hearings
on amendments to a 1974 no-smoking law (Newsletter 96):.
Culver City, Council is consideringirecommendation (Newsletter
104) to limit smoking in certain confined public places.
San Diego is considering expandiing,its tough no-smoking law
TNewsletter 120) to include restaurants unless owners estab-
llish separate no-smoking areas.,
MICHIGAN: Saginaw City CounciL defeated by one vote--fromia nonsmoker
--a proposal to ban smoking during the council's meetings. A Wayne
County Board' of Commissioners' committee approved a proposal to ban
smoking in rooms smaller than the 550-seat main auditorium of the City-
County Buildingi. The sponsor of the resolution said: "I believe that Wayne
County, can set an example for other governments in the Detroit area whose nonsmoking
members must wade t'hrough,smoke t'o see who is talking,or even to read papers im front
of'him."
AND:TE?4AS: Houston City Council voted unanimous final ap-
proval of an ordinance banning smoking in many public,and
private areas, which takes effect with posting of no-smoking
signs. The ordinance allows 30 days for,posting in super-
markets, designated areas of certain retail stores,, hospitals,
nursing homes, passenger elevators, theaters, libraries and
display areas of museums. A proposed ordinance before the
Lubbock City Councili to prohibit smoking in elevators, res-
taurants, theaters, buses and public meeting places,, unless
special areas are set aside for smokers, drew strange re-
sponses. There were smokers who believed the curb was neededd
and nonsmokers who found the idealof additional govt., con-
trol of any kind more offensive than smoking if, wheniandi
where one wished.,
TWO:WITP!1ESSES waited to testify before an Qhio: Senate committee on a
smoking bam bill. Phil Smith, of the Ohio Assn. of Tobacco Dilstribu-
tors, was against it. Gene Gorrow, an unemployed social worker,, was
for it., According to the page one story i~n the Columbus Dispatch, a
senator had to step in to prevent a pushing match when Gorrow tried to
snatch away Smith's cigarette.
. . _... _.. . ___ . ..-.,.. _ _ ,. ,,,, .-. -._...;_.., .. ~.. ;~ - -
LETTER TO EDITOR'of a metropolitan Denver newspaper, the
Times-C'a11,,from a Boulder County Health Department employee
addressed the subject of requests for mandatory no-smoking
sections in food establiishments. The writer said, "The trend
nationally and'localay is to adopt anti'-smoking, lau:s; as,is evi;~~denced by
the new Boulder City mzti-smoking,ordinance., N1any people, however, feel
we have too many lizWs,.; or that' anti-smoking, laws unjustly infringe on
the rights of private business. " He went on to~ urge a, voluntary
approach andiconsideration of laws onliy if it fails.
BUSINESS WEEK carried a page regardiing anti-smoking crusade by non-
smokers that was mostly Banzhaf. TI,'s Kloepfer was quoted on points
regarding ambiguous research and segregation of,smokers.
EDITORIAL in the Columbus (Ga.) Enquirer concludes nonsmokers
should'be protectedi, but not at the total expense of'the
smoker.

-5-
BUSINESS EDITOR'of'the Lafayette (Ind.) Journal, S Courier wrote that a.
Caliifornia-based insurance company had expanded its nonsmoker discounts
into the areas of auto, homeowner and renter insurance with premiumicuts
up to 25%.
MEDICAL EDITOR of the Seattle Times says there is:no signn
that busine:ss.places and smokers have,stampeded to folilow
the new Washington smoking regulation:(Newsletter 119).. He
also reported'that a spokesman of the Board'of Health said
few conmplaints had been received.
ERIE COUNTY, N.Y., requires 80% of the space at public:gatherings to be
set aside for nonsmokers, and the firemen in the town of Evans are burn-
ed up. The local fire companies hold bingo games to raise funds for
equipment, and1told,the town board that the ordinance is cutting atten-
diance.
WHAT'S THE MOTIVE? Rosoff's restaurant in NYC announced it
plans to expand its no-smoking area because of customer re-
sponse but the manager also noted:nonsmokers eat faster.
WA'S H I'N GTONI
DEPT. OF JUSTICE moved that U.S. District Cburt
in,Washington:ho:Td up further action on,the Con-
sumer Product Safety Commission matter (Newsletter 122)unt,il pending
congressional activity is completed., The Senate and House have identi-
cal! bills that:would affirmithat the CPSC has no authority over tobacco
and legislativel'y:moot the court's decision in the so-called Moss case.
"THE SAD PART," editorialized the Fort Wayne (Ind'.) News-
Sentinel which reviewed the history of the flap over CPSC's
jurisdiction on tobacco, "we are hiring with our tax money people
in government to do this kind of hair spl,itting:"
USDA,SECRETARY Butz,'declared a Washington commentator, says what he
thinks. And here's what he said in a Winston-Salem~news conference:
"I know the health faddists and those people haue now:got this littZ'e
thing on every package of cigarettes and every advertisement: Every tiine
they put tit' on, the oansurnption goes up. But--I''ve made this steztementa,
and I mean,every word of it,,that as Z'ong as tobacco i's not decZared
ilZegaZ,,and it has not been that, we'Zl do everything we can in this De-
partment' of Agriculture to~keep this tobacco industry healt'h'y,"'
On a questi~on as to1whether there will be a law banning cigarettes, Butz
said,, "No sir,, there are too many members of Congress who smoke."
TAXES
the state cigarette
now 1q1cents.
MARYLAND LEGISLATURE, in aispecial session,,
finally settled onia 4-cent-a-pack increase in
tax,that became effective June 1. The total'~ tax,is
BANZHAF'S ASHisays inia direct mail'fund raising letter that
the organization: is also working for new taxes~on cigarettes.
The solicitatio:n almost gileefulily states:, "Remember, each dollar
raised:on:cigarette taxes is money,you don't have to pay..."

-6-
"QUIT!" CAMPAIGNS.
RADIO STATION WCBS, New York, is broadcasting
a five-tilmesra-day, month-long "Quit Smoking
Clinia" i~n June with the assi~stance of the Cancer Society and the Heart
and'Lung A'ssociations.,
SMOKERSIVACATION CLINIC INC'_,,in Great Neck, N.Y., advertises
a new wrinkle for those who want to learn how to quit at "a
carefully selected paradise vacation spot." Their brochure
says, "We'll be happy to ga over the possibilities of aitax
deduction for our program..."
ACTOR CHUCK'CONNORS is on:the road and TV promoting Schick Centert for
the Control of Stnoking.Schick-reformed Connors, well!-known as "The
Rifleman", even gags on gun smoke according to the Fort Worthi(Tex.).
Press.
PEDPLE
DR. LAURIE MOORE, new president of the Tidewater
Chapter of the Va. Lung Assn., declared there
is probably twenty times greater concentration of gases in the smoke
from a cigarette than,in the smoke from a plant the federal govt. would
close down for polluting the air, according the the Newport News (Va.,)
Times-Herald.
DR. HUGHiC. KIGER, retiring director of the Tobacco Division
:of USDA,'s Foreign A'griculturaL Serv3ce,: was honored for 30
years of'outstanding service at a dinner given by The Tobacco
Institute on May 27. His successor has not been named.
RETIRED:: Al Forsythe,, longtime counsel for U!.S. Totiacco, member of TI"s
committee of counsel, officer of the Sierra Club and Friends of the Earth.
HEAVY DRINKERS AND' SMOKERS over 4',5 need periodic screening
for cancer of the tongue, Dr. Condict Moore of the University
.of Louisville (Ky,.)' School of Medicine asserted during ann
international symposium on cancer of'the head and neck. The
Medical Tribune which:reported the meeting, held in Montreux,
Switzerland, noted Moore also said, "AI great many second-stage
cancera can b'a avoidad if'the patient decides to stop smoking.,"'
RESEARCH
taking The Pill are
they are al!so heavy
report.
MI SCELLANY
A,TEAM INCLUDING SIR RICHARD DOLL reported in
the British MedicaL J~urnali that youngi women
at greater risk of heart attacks, the more so if
smokers. Engli~sh an&U.S. newspapers covered the
PHONED-IN COMMENT FROM'A CHEST PHYSICIAN during
aiPeoria radio talk-show appearance of TI's
William Dwyer: ". ., .you quote your statistics and you quote your studies, Some
of t~em are very honest and some of'them I,just can't go along with. I aZ'so see
studzes that are in our journals that are aZso~dishonest and prejudiced toward the
opposite end where the study i:'s obviousZy biased against tobacco. Z°..hat's very true,
and I can't deny this myself."
