Lorillard
Tobacco Institute Newsletter
Fields
- Alias
- 03653718/03653725
- Type
- NELE, NEWSLETTER
- CHAR, CHART/GRAPH
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT FILE ROOM
- Site
- N14
- Request
- R1-037
- Master ID
- 03652627/4101
Related Documents:- 03652674
- 03652675-2676
- 03652679-2684 Naleo Update
- 03652732
- 03652746
- 03652770
- 03652780
- 03652783
- 03652792
- 03652793
- 03652794
- 03652795
- 03652796
- 03652797
- 03652799
- 03652802
- 03652803
- 03652811
- 03652812
- 03652813
- 03652814
- 03652815-2816
- 03653039-3216 A Study of the U.S. Tobacco Industrv's Economic Contribution to the Nation, Its Fi Fty States, and the District of Columbia 790000
- 03653397-3485 Report Summary A Study of the U.S. Tobacco Industry's Economic Contribution to the State and Counties of New York 790000
- 03653486 Tobacco Action Network Annual Report 780000
- 03653487 First Annual Report of Tobacco Action Network T.A.N.
- 03653488-3648 Memorandum
- 03653533-3536 781127 Meeting in Trenton, New Jersey Todiscuss Strategy Relating to the Public H Ealth Council Hearing on 781211
- 03653538 Final Tallies/Massachusetts Campaign
- 03653539-3544 Preliminary Report on the Campaign to Encourage A 'no' Vote on the Public Policy Question Concerning Smoking in Public Places Within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
- 03653545-3546 Untitled Document 03653545/3546
- 03653547 Untitled Document 03653547
- 03653548 Untitled Document 03653548
- 03653549 Untitled Document 03653549
- 03653550-3551 Untitled Document 03653550/3551
- 03653552 Police - Can They Enforce Smoking Prohibition Laws?
- 03653554-3557 Dade County Initiative/Status Report
- 03653558 Initiative Petition
- 03653649 Tobacco Institute Newsletter 730000 Thru750000
- 03653650-3657 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653658-3665 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653666-3673 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653673 British Renew Smoking - Cancer Debate
- 03653674-3681 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653682-3687 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653688-3691 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653692-3697 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653698-3703 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653704-3709 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653710-3717 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653726-3733 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653734-3739 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653740-3747 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653748-3753 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653754-3759 Some Facts About Tobacco
- 03653760-3766 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653767-3772 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653773-3776 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653777-3782 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653783-3788 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653789-3796 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653797-3804 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653805-3812 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653813-3820 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653837-3843 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653844-3849 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653850-3851 Congressional Record - Tobacco
- 03653852-3855 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653856-3859 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653860-3867 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653868-3874 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653875-3882 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653883-3888 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653889-3892 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653893-3898 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653899-3902 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653903-3910 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653911-3914 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653915-3918 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653919-3922 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653923-3930 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653931-3934 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653937-3942 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653943-3946 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653947-3950 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653951-3958 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653959-3966 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653967-3974 Tobacco Institute Newsleter
- 03653975-3982 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653983-3990 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653991-3998 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653999-4006 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654007-4014 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654015-4022 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654023-4026 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654027-4030 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654031-4034 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654035-4040 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654041-4046 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654047-4052 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654053-4058 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654059-4064 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654065-4070 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654071-4076 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654077-4081 Congressional Record
- 03654082-4087 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654084-4085 Congressional Record
- 03654088-4093 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654094-4101 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- Author (Organization)
- Hew, Dept of Health Education and Welfare
- TI, Tobacco Inst
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Characteristic
- MINI, MINIMUM CODING
- UCSF Legacy ID
- ehk71e00
Document Images
PREPARED 6Y. THE'~, INSTITUTE'~.. STAFF TO: INFORM
TME'~. INDUSTRY' OF' NEWSWORTHY DEVELOPMENTS~~
RHSEARCH
tween smoking and lung
Number 128
July~ 2~9!, 1975~
THE MAP ON THE BACK PAGE--fascinating to those
concerned with the asserted association:be-
cancer--is adapted from the "Atlas" just pub-
lished by the National Cancer Institute.
What you see is~the counties where,, by statistical test,
lung cancer death, rates for white males from 1950-69 were
significantly higher than in alll other counties in the U.S.
The rates were calculated from all cancer death certificates;
the locations were ascribed "to the county of usual,resiidence
given on the certificates."
ELEVEN YEARS AGO the Surgeon General''s Advisory Committee linked smo-
king to lung cancer, mainly because statistical studies of white males
showedian association., The new county dataiweren't available to in-
fluence,that judgment.,
Nor do they offer strengthening of the:smoking-1!ung cancer
hypothesis. To take a striking example::
~ Of 64 counties in Louisiana, 38 are i~n the highest 108%
lung cancer death,rate bracket compared with the U1.S. as a,
whole; of these, 13 are in the top 1%. Yet, according to
official tax',records compil'ed by the Tobacco: Tax Councill,
per capita cigarette sales~duriing the period ranged between.
82 and 1201packs per year.
~ Wyomingihas no counties with elevated' lung cancer deathh
rates. More than half are below the U.S., average. At thee
same time,, its per capitaicigarette sales ranged from 121 to
144' packs.
LIiKE AN INCREASINGIAMpUNT of research since the Surgeon General"s re-
port, the geographic tally seems to raiise far more questions than it
answers. As the authors of the new study put it::

-2-
"The maps for lung cancer indicate that excessive mort'adity,is not
limited to highly populated urban areas where cigarette smoking and air
pollution are most,prominent...Further st'.udies are needed' to identify
the environmental and'demograph'ic factors contributing to the increased
risk of 1ung,cancer:in these predominantly rural' and port areas."
A "FACT SHEET" issued'by'NCI sai&its scientists found high rates of
lung.,, liverandr bladder cancersin:"coun.t'ies with significant employment.in.t the chemical
industry" and "above-average lung cancer death rates in counties
where a significant percentage of the work force is engaged in smelt'ing and'refining
oflcopper, lead and zinc ores. Arsenic,, a known human cancer-producing agent, is ann
airborne byproduct of the smelting operation."
AN NCI SPOKESMAN said single copies of the "Atlas" are avail-
able free from NCI and that larger orders will be taken by
the Superintendent of Documents at the Govt. Printing Office
later. Meanwhile, readers interested in additional copies
of a map adapted1from this Newsletter are invited,to re-
quest them from The Tobacco Institute..
TAKINGITO TASK the "neither balanced nor accurate" report of a Britilshh
researcher on stop-smokingimethodology in an earlier edition of Amer-
ican Heart Journal, H;arvard"s Car1 Seltzer wrote in the,same journal::
"The history'of inedicine_throughout the centuries contains many examples
of evangelical fervor for:etiblogic or therapeutic'theories that were
later shown to be:wrong. A prime responsibility of epidemiologists is
to maintain the skepticismof science amidst the passions of evangelism.
If smoking is related to CHD ((coronary,heart disease)) in only a limited
segment of the population, the peopLe who are not at risk wi11'hard7y
be benefitted'by blunderbuss interventions aimed at everyone. If:smo-
king is not causally related to CHD, the true situation wi1'1' never be
discerned'unless investigators observe the cardinal scientific principle
of ruling out,count'er-hypotheses. Unti1' conclusive proof is available,
the health of the public and'the welfare of'science demand'a balanced
consideration of all the available evi'dence:"
IN A'N' INTERVIEW with,the Jerusalem Post last,month,SeTtzer said:
"Scientific truth has never been attained by regarding it:as a political'i:ssue to bee
settledlby a democratic process of'majori'ty vote or opinion." He al'lso stated,,
"The current' dogma that cigarette smoking, is a major ri'sk factor inicausing,disease
may'become:an outstanding fallacy'of our era."
HOUSTON CHRONICLE reported'that Eugene Jacobson, identifiedd
as chairman of the physiology dept, at the U., of Tex~. med-
ical schooli, has "discovered" that nicotine suppresses'a
natural' antacid and in that way causes uTcers of the small
intestine.
A UNIV. OF COPENHAGEN researcher, Bo Holma, reported'to last month's
3srdiWorld Conference',on Smoking and Health that in a1survey of olderr
neighborhoods im that city, beer drinking, substandard housing and
dampness were better predictors of respiratory symptoms than cigarettee
smokingi. Holima's text, just now availabLe, says smoki~ng,i!s hazardous,
but that the study "demonstrates the necessit':y of considering locad' circumstances,,
habit's, standards of'Iiving:, housi'ng> etc.,in evaluating the relative iinportance of
the effect of smoking on health.'"'

-3-
GERMAN TfJBACCO COMPANIES announced they will increase smoking;-hea7th
resear-ch support with contracts to,domestic and foreign institutions
supervi~sed by a council of independent scientists, phasingiout the i~n-
dustry"s own Research Institute..
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES has scheduled a vote
this week on its version of the Consumer Pro-
duct Safety Commission Improvement Act (Newsletter 126) which provides
a blanket exemption of "tobacco and tobacco products." The Senate
passed a similar measure July 18 which amended the exemption (Newsletter.
125) to alilow the CPSC jurisdiction to consider regulating cigarettes
as an "ignition source" (Newsletter 112) as long as any resulting stand-
ards would not increase the "health risks" of cigarettes. Should the
House measure pass, a conference between the House and Senate would be
required to resolve the:differences in the two bills.
WASHINGTON
REP. PEYSER'(D-N.Y:.) offered alfloor amendment to knock out
rice, peanut and tobacco price supports and'acreage controls
during debate on the agriculture appropriations bill. He
withdrew it after brief debate during, which no one supportedl
it. Rep. Jenrette (D-S.C.) attackedi"anti-tobacco zealots,"
evenireferred to the recent 3rd World Conference on Smoking
and Health::
"You and'I and'every,other taxpayer contributed our share to pay for
this silly conference. T'he affait cost U.S. citizens more than $250,000.,
The money went from,HEW to the American Cancer Society, and from there
" into the expense accounts of about 150 foreign' delegates who were paid'
air fare and'$50 a day for Iiving and food and beverage expenses at:the
WaIdorf Astoria.," .
USDA FOREIGN AG SERV'SCE termination of cooperative tobacco market de-
velopment program (Newsletter 126) provoked this remark by R. Lionel
Van Deerlin (D-Calif'.) in the House of:Representatives:, "The sums involved,
were modest,,in comparison with other programs. But the principle was 1'arge indeed:
While banning cigarette commercials from airwaves in this country, our Government
was not only encouraging such advertising abroad'but actually helping to pay for it."
He called the expenditures "international pay,ola." .
BIG SLOGAN of the antismoking drive has been "100,000 doctorss
have quit,smok,ing. Maybe they know something you don"t."' It
was based on a survey done for the Clearinghouse for Smoking
and Health years ago, but never published. Last year a Clear-
inghouse spokesman said' it was so full of,mistakes it was a
"waste" of time and money. Now, according to Medical WorTd
News, it"s~due for an update, with~embellishments. The re-
port says Chilton Research Service will survey 20,000 physi-
cians, dentists, nurses and pharmacists on their smoking habits.
U.S. SENATE CONFIRMEDiDavid Mathews as Secretary of Health, Educatiionn
and'WeTfare July 22 by voice vote.
NEW SM'OKE-BANILAWS IN'EFFECT:, Delaware now
bans smokingion street cars and buses. Idaho
law whichibecame effective,this month,prohibits smoking at public meet-
ings in government owned buildings. Massachusetts governor signed a
law July 17, to become effective 90 days later, to restrict smoking,to.
NbNSMOKER' ISSUE
Gi
Q

-4-
specifically designated areas only, if any, in museums, libraries,,
hospitals, nursing homes trains, planes and other mass transit con-
vey:ances. The law has no penalty provisions for violations.
Minnesota"s "C1ean Indoor Air Act," primarily a bill to seg-
regate smokers and nonsmokers in public facilities, classifies
violations as a petty misdemeanor. A,liaw which becomes ef-
fective next month in Nebraska defines smokingias "dangerous
to the health,and welfare of each person" and requires the
posting of no-smoking si;gns.in "any hospital patient,room or
patient area, elevator, ind'oor theater, library,, art museum,
concert hall or bus..." New North Dakota law requires the
"governing authority or person having responsibility for the
supervision of any publicly owned building" to "designate by
sign~those areas within such building where smoking of to-
bacco products shall be prohibited or permitted" beginning
this month.
MICHIGAN HOUSE approved1two bills by large majprities which would re-
quire restaurants with a capacity of 50 or more patrons to provide
special nonsmoker sections and to prohibit smoking at hospitals except
in designated areas. The bills were,referred to the Senate for con-
sideration.
NEW PROPOSALS: A bill was introduced in the Alabama House,of
Representatives which would declare smoking in certain public
places a misdemeanor andiproviding that violators would be,
subject to fines of $10 to $100., The San IDiego County (Calif.)
Board of Supervisors is considering an expansion of its no-
smoking ordinance (,Newsletter 90). -
YORK (Pa.) CITY:COUNCIL members skirmished over a proposed bill which
would have made smokingior carryiingia lighted cigarette,cigar, pipe,
or other tobacco in ch:ambers a crime punishable by,fine or imprison-
ment.
One member suggested1that,the removal of the smoker from the
room woul'd' be more appropriate and another said smoking should,
be allowed in chambers since smokers as well as nonsmokers
helped pay for the building. The author of the proposal said
he would give the matter further study and try again.
PROPOSALS REJECTED:, 'In California, the Fullerton City Cbuncil rejected
a ban on smoking in public places fashionediafter the Orange County
ordinance (Newsletter 125) and the Sen Francisco Board of Superuisorss
turned down a proposed ordinance to prohibit smoking in public places
andicertain retail establi~shment and other places of public assembliy.
SEVERAL MONTHS after the City Council declined to act on a
smoking ban (Newsletter 123) in public places, the Council
Bluffs (Iowa); Nonpareil concluded in an editorial,,'"Despite
warnings about the dangers of smoking, its prohibitions in.certain
places and restrictions on advertising>,one reality remains clear: some
people will smoke no matter what. But do:nonsmokers have to stiffer for
that, at least in crowded, pub3ic areas?'"'
(TI notices this editorial is only a sllightly localized

-5-
version of one appearing around the country with identical
copy and, in many cases,, the same headline.,)
MARYLAND~'S NO}SMOKE LAWS (Newsletter 1!21)' have been in effect since
July 1 and the Washington Post says they probably will never be strictly
enforced. State Delegate Steven Sklar,: who pushed for the smoking laws,
told a Post reporter, "The whole intent of the legis3ation is to make smoking less
socia32y acceptabde. We want to decrease the opportunities to smoke as much as pos-
sible."
LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS quoted by Houston~(Tex.) Post say
that city's no-smoking ordinance (Newslletter 124) will rank
with the ban on spitting on the sidewalk, a law all police
cadets, learn in the, academy but "never waited around, for someone
to spi t,so we could make an arrest."
THE PRECEDENT'SET by Baltimore, which~has had an ordinance banning smo-
king in elevators since 1974,, is not interpreted as very encouraging
regarding the,enforcability of the new state law according to a column
in the Baltimore Morning Sun., The writer says most smokers obey no-
smoke signs but those who don't are sufficiently large enough in num-
ber to:make the city law largely ineffective. He asks, "When was the
last time you saw anyone ejected ('by force, if necessary,' the city
ordinance says) or even told to leave an elevator because he was smo-
king?"_ ,
REGIONAL CHAPTER OF ASH writes the Baltimore Evening Sun to
ask the paper to advise.readers of the new Maryland no-smokee
laws, then proceeds to lecture that, "At least thirty-four mi1-
3ion Americans, or one in every six, are physicaLly,sensitive to tobacco
smoke."
The: writer' says, "Symptoms suffered by,second'-hand'smokers include:
headache, nausea,, wheezing,: coughingy watering,,burning eyes, elevated
blood'pressure and'increased'heart strain, hives, sinus congestion, in-
creased susceptibility,to colds, etc., etc."
NEW YORK Dept. of Health spokesman admitted'to Yonkers Herald Statesr
man that enforcement of the state's new,smokingiban llaw (Newsletter
121), which provides for fines from $10 to $1,00, will be diffiicult.
"We:do~not have the manpower to do this.. We are extremely overburdened. It is
hoped the presence of the law wi11'act as a deterrent."
Th& police chief in White Plains said, "We really, won't have the
time to do just'' that--enforce the 1aw, but if we do see someone we will'
ask them to extinguish the cigarette."
MILWAUKEE JOURNAL reports that a survey of'23'general hospitals in Mil-
waukee and Waukesha Counties made by GASP shows few have banned'smokingi.
Twenty-two,discourage smoking by signs or reminders by staff, only six,
have outlawed smoking by patients, and all permit visitors to~smoke--
somewhere.
CONTINUING STUDY pertaining to "on-going changes in the social
controli of cigarette smok,ing"' was updated' in a recent Social
Problems article by Elane Nuehring,, Fla. State: Univ.,, and,
GeraTd! Markle, Western Mich. Univ., which noted:, "...ant'i-smoking

-6-
forces are now agitating for new and'stronger coercive legislation.
Thus, efforts in the near future to regulate the sale of cigarettes
should'serve as good ind,icators of the probable success or failure of'
the whole anti-smoking movement."
THE FUROR in~the press over nonsmokers' rights, Kansas City Star assoc-
iate editor Bill Vaughan observes, seems to center around restaurants
and he conclude s: "What I'suspect'is that every diner has habits that irritate
the people around' him., The only solution I can see is to surround each table withh
a wall'..."
HtA'LTH ORGANIZATIONS
CHARITY: Iit"s good to know that your Christ-
mas Seal donation helps pay the expenses of a
free restaurant guide. This step toward conquering respiratory dis-
eases comes from the Washington Lung Assn, in Seattle which:, according
to a news account, will be glad to send you a li~st of restaurants with
separate seating for nonsmokers. A stamped, self-addressed return en-
velope is not necessary.
~' Not to be outdone,, FANS (Fresh Air for Non Smokers), described
in thie Beverly, M'ass., Times as "a division of the American
Lung Association,"'reports it has a computer compiling lilsts;
of restaurants to be available to nonsmokers,
"PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICIALS," writes Dr. Naomi Blluestone,of the NYC Dept.
of Health in the: New: Englandl Journal of Medicine "want people fixed,, well,
functioning optimally, perceiving,maximally,, enjoyxng and experiencing 1'ife to the
fullest of their varying potentials. We intrude this ethic upon them even as they
blow smoke in our faces, and'like as not, we puff'back into t'heirs., Sometimes I
wonder if we are not all just a bunch of busybodies with unbridled rescue fantasies."
INDUSTRY
TI"S SOUTHWEST A'REA:MANAGER,, Dan Aiverson, inn
a speech to the Colorado Sprinqs Executive Assn:
.,.These tobacco issues should not be seen or perceived as feuds simply,between
cigarette makers and'emotional' crusaders.. It's much larger, because liberty is
involved."
PACIFIC COAST AREA MANAGER, David McLean, notes in a news re-
Ilease there is an ironic twist in the timing of anti-smoking
organizations' efforts: "'In thisbicentennialperiod; when mostRmer-icans are looking back to the
hi'storical: origin,of our individual'rights
and Iibertiesy, it is paradoxica3 that some groups are seeking,to persuade
government,to pass oppressive 1'aws to restrict our individual:rights and
persona3'Iiberties."'
"THE ART OF SPOKESMANSHIP" was the subject of'a paid-attendance seminar
in Chicago organized by the Public Relations Society of America.: TII's
Connie Drath and Bill Dwyer were invited lecturers and their remarks
were front-paged in aisubsequent PRSA,newslietter., The report said they
"noted that thei'r speaking engagement's include numerous small groups:since they,cany tie this in
with media contact' schedules., They pointed.out that some organizations
restrict speakers to 'Iarge audiences' leaving untouched'persons in many sma11 but
valuable audiences."
i
"QUIT" CAMPAIGNS
READERS OF'THE GREENVILLE NEWS have,been in,
vited to join a newlyformed "SOS"' (Smokers

-7-
On Strike) Club sponsored'by the Piedmont Branch of the South Carolina
LungiAssociation.
Schick,Centers announced the opening of three temporary stop-
smoking centers in California that Alex Reuss, president of.
Schick Laboratories, call!edi"part of Schick's recently d'e-
veTope&Field' Therapy Unit program," according to the San Fran
cisco Daily Commercial News.
TAXES
"NUISANCE TAXES" PACKAGE passed by the New Jer-
sey Senate includes a one-cent increase in cig-
arette tax. The package was designed to make up funds slashed from
state budget by Gov., Brendan Byrne. The proposal is pending beforee
the state House.,
DISTRICT OF'COLUM'BIA Mayor has signed increasedltaxing auth-
ority bill recently passed by city council. The measure,,
containing an increase from six cents to 10 cents in the.
District cigarette tax, now goes to Capitol Hill for a re-
view by Congress.
MEDIA.
"THE QUESTION ARZiSESa,"'ponders a Baltimore
Morning Sun editorial, is it literally possible
for someone to "smoke himself (or herself) to death?' Researchers hedge their ans-
wers a bit in an effort to be scrupu3ousd'y fair,:but there seems no doubt the pos-
.sibi'Iity exists."
M'I SCELLAW~Y'
THE CHURCH BULLETIN of Church of 0ur Lady of
Angels, Brooklyn, N.Y.,had an item on alcohol
'.which said, "Whoever heard'of'anyone being charged'with causing a h'ighway, deathh
because h'e,smuaked a cigarette? Whoever heard of',a man puffing a cigarette and then
going home,and chopping up his family?' Whoever heard'of a cigarette emboZdening a
punk to:shoot a merchant in a hold-up? Whoever heard'of a family,broken up because
of'smoking:? Whoever heard'of a man insulting hi's guests because he picked:up a cig-
arette?" Thee arti!cleconcl!udes., "Byy comparisonn with~d a1'cohol' andnarcotics,. to-
bacco is benign..."
#4 #

a
CANCER MORTALITY, 1950-69, BY COUNTY
TRACHEA, BRONCHUS & LUNG
SOURCE:
At1as Of Cancer Mortality For U.S. Counties: 1950-1969
U.S. Department of HEW Publication No. (NIH) 75-780
SZLCS9co
I
WHITE MALES.
