Lorillard
Tobacco Institute Newsletter
Fields
- Alias
- 03653698/03653703
- Type
- NELE, NEWSLETTER
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT FILE ROOM
- Site
- N14
- Request
- R1-037
- Master ID
- 03652627/4101
Related Documents:- 03652674
- 03652675-2676
- 03652679-2684 Naleo Update
- 03652732
- 03652746
- 03652770
- 03652780
- 03652783
- 03652792
- 03652793
- 03652794
- 03652795
- 03652796
- 03652797
- 03652799
- 03652802
- 03652803
- 03652811
- 03652812
- 03652813
- 03652814
- 03652815-2816
- 03653039-3216 A Study of the U.S. Tobacco Industrv's Economic Contribution to the Nation, Its Fi Fty States, and the District of Columbia 790000
- 03653397-3485 Report Summary A Study of the U.S. Tobacco Industry's Economic Contribution to the State and Counties of New York 790000
- 03653486 Tobacco Action Network Annual Report 780000
- 03653487 First Annual Report of Tobacco Action Network T.A.N.
- 03653488-3648 Memorandum
- 03653533-3536 781127 Meeting in Trenton, New Jersey Todiscuss Strategy Relating to the Public H Ealth Council Hearing on 781211
- 03653538 Final Tallies/Massachusetts Campaign
- 03653539-3544 Preliminary Report on the Campaign to Encourage A 'no' Vote on the Public Policy Question Concerning Smoking in Public Places Within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
- 03653545-3546 Untitled Document 03653545/3546
- 03653547 Untitled Document 03653547
- 03653548 Untitled Document 03653548
- 03653549 Untitled Document 03653549
- 03653550-3551 Untitled Document 03653550/3551
- 03653552 Police - Can They Enforce Smoking Prohibition Laws?
- 03653554-3557 Dade County Initiative/Status Report
- 03653558 Initiative Petition
- 03653649 Tobacco Institute Newsletter 730000 Thru750000
- 03653650-3657 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653658-3665 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653666-3673 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653673 British Renew Smoking - Cancer Debate
- 03653674-3681 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653682-3687 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653688-3691 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653692-3697 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653704-3709 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653710-3717 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653718-3725 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653726-3733 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653734-3739 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653740-3747 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653748-3753 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653754-3759 Some Facts About Tobacco
- 03653760-3766 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653767-3772 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653773-3776 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653777-3782 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653783-3788 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653789-3796 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653797-3804 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653805-3812 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653813-3820 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653837-3843 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653844-3849 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653850-3851 Congressional Record - Tobacco
- 03653852-3855 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653856-3859 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653860-3867 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653868-3874 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653875-3882 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653883-3888 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653889-3892 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653893-3898 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653899-3902 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653903-3910 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653911-3914 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653915-3918 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653919-3922 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653923-3930 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653931-3934 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653937-3942 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653943-3946 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653947-3950 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653951-3958 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653959-3966 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653967-3974 Tobacco Institute Newsleter
- 03653975-3982 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653983-3990 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653991-3998 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03653999-4006 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654007-4014 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654015-4022 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654023-4026 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654027-4030 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654031-4034 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654035-4040 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654041-4046 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654047-4052 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654053-4058 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654059-4064 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654065-4070 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654071-4076 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654077-4081 Congressional Record
- 03654082-4087 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654084-4085 Congressional Record
- 03654088-4093 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- 03654094-4101 Tobacco Institute Newsletter
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- Author (Organization)
- TI, Tobacco Inst
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Characteristic
- MINI, MINIMUM CODING
- UCSF Legacy ID
- bhk71e00
Document Images
PREPARED BY, THE INSTITUTE STAFF TO. INFORM
THE INDUSTRY' OF NEWSWORTHY OENELOPMENTS.
FOREIGN
his doubts about smoking and lungicancer. But it didn't liast,long.
Letters hit editors' desks. Anti-tobacco scientists complained. The
Daily Express saidlBurch has "provoked horror in the anti-smoking lobby"'
and "'lit up a king-size controversy."
Health Minister Owen wrote,Burch to say he's been relying on
the findings of the Royal College of Physicians and is ask-
ing a committee to take another look., Spectator noted the
lack of'"'an experimentally proven relationship" and commend-
edlBurch for declaringithat the emperor has no:clothes-
BACK HOME The Kentucky Post reacted kindly to Burchi. "The strongest argu-
ment we know of'against smoking>" it said,, "came from an i'nvet'erate chewer. He
opined'that it was bound to be a sin to burn up anything that tasted so good."
NEW BRITISH GUIDELINES'for advertising cigarettes (Newsletter
130) were the subject of strong reactions. Action on Sinoking
_._-_-_.-.and Health cal!Ied the new code "grossly inadequate." DaiT
Te2egraph,, which has criticized proposed govt. tobacco re-
strictions (klewsletter 121), complained that "grown men can
take time off from major cares of State to ensure that cigarette ad-
verti'sements should only depict (presumably) the sort of'pa1'e figures
in raincoats and Nationad' Health spectacles who lurk outside dirty book-
shops.,"'
The usually staid Times of London editorialized about:"the new nicotine
man," and said' "degl'amourization could hardly be carried further unless it is il-
licit tol aduerti'se (G(,cigarettes) ) at aT1." It predicted' the cigarette smok-
er to be portrayed in the future will be "condemned' to appear middle-aged,
sallow, without evident success in business or bed, stuck in some dim,occupation~
incapable of:deriving any pleasure from his vice."'
ASHiis testing the new code, says Ad ~, by calling for elim-
ination:of the royal seal from ads for two brands of cigarettes..
LAST NEWSLETTER saidlNBC
N~umber, 131
September 16,
1975'.
reported "'stunned sii-
lence" after EngilandPs Prof., Burch broadoast

-2'-
CAM'PAIiGN, the Britishiad industry paper, reported Sept. 5 that the U.S.
Federal Trade Commission i~s reading the code with alview to drawingiup
similar rules here.
U'.K'., CIGARETTE MFRS., said they"11! drop brand advertising in
ci~nemas except during X-rated programs, andiwilL begin print-
ing "tar"-nicotine yield's onicigarette packs.
LONDONiTSMES said Philip Morris Europe became the first cigarette com-
pany in 11years to "publicize assertions which challenge,prevailimgi
medical opinion" in the U.K. when it circulated a summary of medical
journal reports which do not support the smoking-health causal hypo-
thesis.
Medical' correspondent Oliver,Gillie wrote,two columns sum-
marizing the publication and trying, to debunk it, interview-
ing anti-tobacco dbctors for,the purpose.
LONDON DAILIES said,U.K.'s National Soci~ety of Non_Smokers:vfias~cHose`n'.
next,Ash Wednesday to renew a drive,against vending machines and pub-
1iic smokingi.
NONSWIOKER' ISSUE
STERLING of'Canada's Simon Fraser Univ. wrote
a 15-page "critical reassessment" of the smok-
iing-llung cancer hypothesis in the September American Journal of Public
Health., Weiss, an anti-smoking Philadelphia physician, follows wstha
two-page rebuttal. In the unusual "debate," Sterling appears as a
scientist troubled by lack of support for the hypothesis while Weiss
seems not to want to be bothered with the facts.
Sterling suggests that the American Cancer Society "miIlion
personsP" study can:''t,be compared with the general population
because the ACS volunteers inadvertently selected people dis-
proportionately younger, more educated, taller, white, native-
born,, Protestant,, urban,, nonsmoker and dying more from lung
cancer (three times more for females and twice as oftenifor
males), heart diseases and emphysema. Weiss shrugs it all
off as "obfuscati~on."
ONITHE'WEINBERGER:PROPOSAL to banihigh-"'tar" cigarettes (Newsletter
129) ) , Raleigh, Times sai!d the govt. is "maving to eiiini~riate"the'itiost "'
offensive abuser of the nation"s lungs"...Phoenix Republic criticiz8di
the proposal--but in,defense of freedbm, not smoking itsel!f. It said
"every smoker already knows it"s an expensive,, obnoxious, filthy habit
that almost certainly will,shorten his life"...Olathe (Kan.)' News head-
lined a column: "Big brother is at it again"...A Chicago Tribune col-
umnist wrote that if CIA wants to try again to poison Castro,, they"11
have to send filtered cigars...Miami News said a ban on "high risk
cigarettes" is like a ban on high,calorie whipped cream..
Reaction to Nader call for an endito tobacco "subsidies"': ~
Phoenix Gazette said that the govt., paying for both, tobacco C!1!
"'subsidies" and anti-smoking, programs, is "working against
itself"..,.,Mlilwaukee Journal callled:tobacco supports a"death.
subsidy."' ~
~
0
Bremerton (Wash.) Sun reviewed FTC's quarrel about warning statement
displays, calling it a "worthless requirement."

FEDERAL TOBACCO SUBSIiDY'was subject of debate between Reps.` `' Mathiis (D-Gai. ) and Peyser
(P=N.Y. ) at WOR Radio, N.Y. City,on August 201.
NEW SCIENTIST in U.K. reported an anonymous tip that the director of
the U.S. National Cancer Institute is a "closet cigarette smoker."
__ CHARLES:KURALT.noted.oniCBS.that after you've gotten off a,
plane in Minneapolis, lighting up in the terminal can cost
youla $100 fine. '
CHRONOLOGY OF A',"NEWS" STORY: August UPI item out of San Francisco
said' "a study reported by Blue Cross of Northern California links smoking,to
ulcers" and cited study of 37,000 adults: showing peptic ulcers twice as
prevalent amongimen who smoked as amongithose who dli~d:n't. Blue Cross
told TI it had used the i!tem'in its September 1974!newsletter, picki~ngg
it up from an item in a June 1974, Family Health issue., Fami~l Healthh
story,_in turn, came from aiMarch 1974!Wa11 Street Journal article on
CTR-supported research:by Friedtnan and Seltzer publi~shed in Feb. 28
New England'Journal of Medicine. Only WSJ'had noted the researchers'
caution that "the present findings do not, in our opinion, remove the uncertainty
of whether the relation of smoking to peptic ulcer is causal."
i
FRIEDMAN, the Purdue professor who,published the book "Pub-
lic Poliicy and the Smoking-Healith Controversy" this year,
says in an editorial in the American Journal of Public Health
that "it remains unclear as to whether filters'andlor reduced tar and
nicot'ine content wi11'resu3t in a less hazardous cigarette." He also
says public pol'~icy regarding smoking-health is a failure..
New'Orleans States & Item ran a 22-inch story based on TI's "Facts
About Tobacco."
Said the Kans. City Kansan approvingily, "slowTy, but surely non-
smokers have been asserting their right to breathe clean air..."
FOOD MERCHA'NTS'ADVOCATE reported that the NYC Dept. of Health, "sent 50
or so inspectors into some 460 super markets t'o issue summonses last month for nott
having the ((71o- smoke))' signs posted, or to peopl'e found smoking. SMDKING: So
wei;e jqAep,:dpep in garhage,
dog dungy, an,assortment of insects and rodents,. including
rats and' roaches, and the city is'1'aying off police, firemen and'sani'tationrmen and
the Department of Health ie looking, for SMOKERS in super markets."
DALLAS MORNING NEWS columnist John Anders reported "'a tor-
rent of abuse" after he wrote favorably about smok:ing..,.The
same paper carried an article from free-llance writer M'a'ry
Anne M'arkley about the nonsmoker movement: "The current trend
to ferret out, fine and hopefully shut down smokers has an air of fanat-
icism about it..."
MEDIA
SALT LAKE CITY TRIBUNE ran a poll statewide on
whether Utah~'s law banning smoking in public
places should be enforced. The agree/disagree/undec'iid:ed split was
77/22/1. Among Mormons it was 84'/15/1.Among non-Mormons it was a
stand'off--52y46/2.
USING SURVEY DATA, the Madison Capital Times said "iit is ob-

-4-
vious that a majority of the public would back a smoking
ban" pending in Wisconsin..,. The city outlawed'smoki~ngi in
all medical facilities including waiting rooms, and at any
public meeting of ten or more persons.
MONROE COUNTY (N~.Y.) Legislature voted to forbidIsmokingiin some public
places and restrict it in others, with,penalti~es up to $250:or 15 days
in jail'..
SAN DIiEGO:"S public places smoking ban (Newsletter 130) was
expand'edlcountywid:e:. A TI spokesman told statewide wiree
services the action was "a mockery of personal freedom."'
TERRANT'COUNTY (TEX.) Commissioners Court voted unanimously to take no
action on a no-smoke ordinance.
VOLUSIA COUNTY (FLA.) Council approved an ordinance banning
smoking on,all county owned or operated buses with violations
punishable by a $500 fine, a 60-day jaiT stay, or bo~h '
In some Penn State Univ. facilities smokers were segregated and in
others smoking banned.
A RETAIiL BUSINESSMAN, reports the San Diego Union, is closing
two stores andimoving to another town that doesn't have a no-
smoking'ordinance becaus:ee he: "canlt.imagine a1aw.tha.t.ma..kes one
citizen responsible for what another does."'
WASHINGTDN
ASSISTANT HEW SECRETARY COOPER, who toTd,the
3rd World Conference on Smoking,andiHealth,
last June that "the cigarette kills liots:of people," was quoted last
month by Medical World News: "We have to present a more balanced view of diet
and'of things like smoking so people get a choice of how they want to live their
lives. I'm not sure it"'s our functi'on:to:protect people from themselves. Certainl'y,,
if they want to smoke, they ought to know what the ri'sk is. But' they ought not to
be Zured'into i't' by unbalanced presentat'ion."'
ASST. SURGEON GENERAL,SENCER says the govt, i's checking,up
on the nation's smoking,patterns again (last time was 1970)
with random calls to some 5,000 citizens. Among new ques- mr,,.,,tioris:- Does the-pubiic know alI
it-needs:to-about: smok,ing-
health? Should employers have the right to ban smoking?
FIVE-YEAR'HEALTH BLUEPRINT,, "Forward Plan for HeaIth:--1977-81"
(Newsletter 129), became available to the public under Dept. of Heal!th,
Education, and Welfare publication no. ('OS)76-50024,.
FDA sent a message to U.SI. doctors teliling them that womenn
over 4',0 taking The P'ill'. appear to have a 400% higher heart
attack risk; higher than that if they're fat or smoke or
have diabetes or high blood pressure.,
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION reported to Congress that per capita cigarette
consumption dropped by two last year in~the U.S. while mfrs. spent more
than ever (except when they used radio and TV) to advertise their brands,,
and for the,first time cigarettes accounted for less than half their re-
venues.

-5-
SEN. PiOSS: (D-Utah)' told' Congress it "has utterly, failed to support the effort
to eliminate smoking related diseases from our country." He put a half do2e n
pages of antismoking material into the Congressional Record.,
INDUSTRY
FEDERAL DDSTRICT COURT'in,N.Y. denied motion
by cigarette makers for a temporary injunction
seeking toistop the Federal Trade Commission fromlinstituting penalties
until decilsion (Newsletter 130) is reached on whether companies vio-
lated a 1972'consentr order requiringiheaIth,warnings in advertising.
According to UPI, Judge Charles Tenney said the companies
failed to show they would suffer "irreparabLe damages"'or
a"Yeasonable probability,"'they would win their suit againstt
the FTC.
TELLING THE STORY:~ TI's two movies, "Leaf"'and "Smokingiand'..Healith:--
The Need1to Know",, have been available to community audiences for 11
and 32.months,,.respectively., Each has been shown nearly 5,000 times'.
for a total audience of more than,350,000 persons.,
SPEAKING UP: TI''s communicators, Connie Drath,and Bill Dwyer,,
notified media in California and Oregonithat they'dlbe availi-
able to talk about smokiing-health and nonsmoker questions..
Result was that between A'ugi. 15 and Sept. 5 they logged 15
Tv:broadcasts, 39 radio interviews,, 13'.newspaper interviews
and'speeches at four meetings of tobacco~distributor employees.
RESEARCH
FAILURE TO SHOW health significance of "'tar"
andinicotine levels in cigarettes was reported
in Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Researchers "'smoked"
hamsters~for a year to contrast high- and 1ow-"tar"'effects.
"Tnd'uced alterations,"'said,the investigators, "were inde-
pendent pendent of the type of cigaret'.te."' And,there was no dif-
ference in the "alterati~ons", neither reversal nor advance,,
one year beyond the end of the smoking,. The researchers
said further studies are needed to "elucidate whether the altera-
tions ((,a re),) precancerous or whether they represent only a nonspeci-
fic response t'o smoke irritation."
M'OROWITZ, a Yale biophysicist and biochemist, reported in Hospital
Practice onid'ata he found "hidden"'in Hammond's famous "million per-
sons"' study which indicted cigarettes: The,oftener people ate fried
foods, the lower their death rates; people sleeping more or less than
7 hours'a night hadihigher death rates thanithose who slept just 7;
the shorter people were, the higher their death rates.All of these
were nonsmokers,, and Morowitz said there'd better be further research
on these risks.,
NEWLY:REPORTED METHOD for,the early detection of lung cancer
(Newsletter 130) has been described as:"cumbersome and un-
convincingf' and impractical by Dr. Nathaniel Berlin, director
of'Northwestern University Cancer Center.
TWO RESEARCHERS at Johns Hopkins Hospital Drs. Gail Gurtner and Barry
Burns, say wire service reports', announcedlthey have ev'iTe__nce that
pregnant women who smoke may be depriving fetuses of oxygen critical
to proper growth and development.

-6-.
SYNDICFITED COLUMN by Dr. Walt Menninger saysc.
"Tensions in life take an enormous to11; andia great
deal of disease is the result of'tension. WhiZe it is extremely difficult to study
and'demonstrate, one might speculate that were the smoker unable to relieve some
tension tfirough smoking, the pressures would take their to11'on another part of the
body."
PEOPLE
He con tinued, "I suspect' that certain individuals may live longer
because they,smoke, precisely,because of the tension factors involved'."'
DR. NATHAN SERIFF, a N.Y'., heart and lungispecialist wrote an,anti-
smoking article for American Lung Assn Bulletin but rejectedlthe belief
that smoking is addictive and said:, "very, frequently, the habit is over within
12 hours after a patient is to3d he has a smoking-related illness and must stop."
CAMPAIGN TO PROMOTE observance of new state
norsmoke law,has been launched by the,Central
Branch of the Georgia Lung Assn., according to the Macon Telegraph &.
News., The law (Newsletter 118) outlaws smoking in any public area
where anyone might put up a no-smoking sign. The,Assn. is offering
no-smoke siigns~to businesses, the paper said..
HEALTH aRGANIZATIONS.
"QUIT SMOKINGIRALLY"" iin Chicago was sponsored by the Illinois
Interagency Council on Smoking and: Disease. The Chicago News
said the program consisted of speakers, mobile display units
and "pickets" with,signs, with nearly 300 spectators.
JOHNS-MANVI,LLE was sued for damages inia class
action on behalf of thousands of present and
former employees for asserted failure to warn them that asbestos could'
cause lungicancer among other things.
MI'SCELLANY
!
