Lorillard
Minutes of the Budget Committee Meeting 550112
Fields
- Type
- MINU, MINUTES
- Area
- CORPORATE MINUTES
- Alias
- 03170606/03170607
- Site
- N6
- Request
- R1-003
- Named Organization
- Budget Comm
- Named Person
- Davies, G.O.
- Hopewell, F.
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- Master ID
- 03170331/0755
Related Documents:- 03170331-0343
- 03170352-0354
- 03170366B Organizational Directive No. 12
- 03170372-0373
- 03170374-0375 Proposed Restoration of Historic Lorillard Mill at the New York Botanical Gardens
- 03170379-0380
- 03170396-0397
- 03170425 Untitled Document 03170425
- 03170427-0428 P. Lorillard Company Budget Year 1953
- 03170428A-0432A
- 03170446A-0448B
- 03170494-0497
- 03170499-0500
- 03170506-0507
- 03170510-0514B
- 03170552-0555
- 03170579-0587
- 03170595A-0603
- 03170605
- 03170631-0634
- 03170698-0709
- 03170713-0715
- 03170731-0736
- 03170753-0755 Untitled Document 03170753/0755
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Author (Organization)
- Budget Comm
- Characteristic
- ATTE, ATTENDEE LIST
- UCSF Legacy ID
- rzx41e00
Document Images
/NCORC011A1[D
TOBACCO-CIGARETTES-CiGARS
1!9 ~r~ 40-l `Se~iv oW 1B S VI F/
Minutes of the Budget Committee Meeting
January 12, 1955
lii
Id
Present: Messrs. F. Hopewell, A. James, I. H. Peak, H. F. Temple, F. M. Walson,
J. E. Bennett, J. J. Darby, G. 0. Davies and J, M. Combs.
The Budget Committee met to review and approve the Operations
Budget and Capital Budget for 1955. Mr. Hopewell presided.
The committee approved both budgets and recommended that they be
submitted to the Board of Directors for final review and appnoval.
The Capital Budget was reviewed by location, and major items were
explained by the responsible executives. The budget was approved without
addition or del etion.
A listing of 1954 non-budget items amounting to $1,483,297, was
reviewed, and Mr. Hopewell stated that the number of items and the amount
of money involved indicate a lack of pnoper planning, which cannot be al-
lowed to continue, as it seriously reduces the effectiveness of budgetary
planning. Futzrr e non-budget i tems will be subject to cl oser scruti ny and
approval will be more difficult to obtain.
Each schedule in the Operations Budget was individually reviewed,
and responsible executives were called upon to answer questions.
Mr. Davies made a detailed presentation of the 8nancing operation
and showed the seriousness of the current situation.
Mr. Hopewell stressed the need to defer any item which can be
postponed without harm to the Company's interests, partiaxlarily through
the first quarter of 1955 -while a ccuracy of the operati ors forecast is
being observed.
Mr. Hopewell closed the meeting with a discussion of the need for
sound budgetary policies and emphasized that the cooperation of all persona
present was essential for t he CompaiW t o derive maximum benefits from
budgeting. The points discussed are summarized below:
1. Work sheets must show basis for estimates in sufficient detail
and itemization to'provide information for intelligent approval,
and for the Budget Dept. to make detailed analysis of variances
during the year.

M
Reasons for increase or decrease from current year's operations
should be noted.
2. This year's budget meeting was held later than desirable, and
future meetings will be held in December. Time schedules will
be established in consultation with appropriate executives in
order to consider problems which affect the availability of
infb an a ti on ( su ch as new brand s, volume of s ale s, advertising
and sales promotion).
t
After schedlle is set, it must be adhered to by all departments
to enable completion of budget in time f or desired meeting date.
3. Each month during 1955, major differexi ces between actual and
budget Will be discussed by the Comptroller or Budget Director
with the various department managers and where necessary their
superiors. The object of these disaissions will be (1) the
improv ement of future budgetary procedures; (2) the exploration
of avenues for expe nse control; (3) the determination that excess
expenditures on "allotment" type expenses have been specifically
approved; (4) the determination when expenditures are under
actual if the deficiency will or will not be made up during the
balanr e of the year.
The size of differences on expe nses and sales may determine if
the budget should be revised at a time other than the regular
mid -y ear revi s ion.
