Lorillard
Marketing Research Project Approval Taste Test Plus T & N Perception Tag-on
Fields
- Author
- F, J.G. <Flinn, J.G.>
- Kaplan, N.J.
- Mau, T.H.
- Alias
- 01842452/01842453
- Type
- MREP, MARKET RESEARCH PROPOSAL
- BUDG, BUDGET/BUDGET REVIEW
- Area
- MARKETING/BASEMENT GMP
- Site
- G42
- Request
- R1-105
- Named Organization
- Burke Marketing Research
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- Master ID
- 01842227/2480
- 01842233 5542 True
- 01842241 5552 Kgl
- 01842257 Marketing Research Project Approval Kent Micr. II 13 Mg. Focus Groups
- 01842261 Marketing Research Project Approval Kent 13 Mg. Tracking Study
- 01842262 Marketing Research Project Approval Kent 13 Mg. Group Sessions
- 01842264 Marketing Research Project Approval Kent Micr. II Recall Test
- 01842266 Marketing Research Approval Kent U Concept / Product Test
- 01842267 Marketing Research Project Approval Kent U Name Test
- 01842268 Marketing Research Project Approval Rent Billboard
- 01842279 Marketing Research Project Approval Taste Test Comparisons Vs. Now / Carlton
- 01842280 Marketing Research Project Approval 85 Mm. Aau Study Wave I
- 01842281 Marketing Research Project Approval Taste Test Vs. Parliment Ultra Light
- 01842282 Marketing Research Project Approval 85 Mm National Aau Study - Wave II
- 01842283 Marketing Research Project Approval Taste Test Vs. Merit & Vantage
- 01842284 Marketing Research Project Approval Taste Test Vs. Decade
- 01842285-2286 "3rd Revision" Marketing Research Project Approval 3 Wave Product Test Panel
- 01842287 Marketing Research Project Approval Exploratory Communications Research for True Advt
- 01842301 Marketing Research Project Approval Newport Lights Aau Waves I & II
- 01842303 Newport Research
- 01842309 Marketing Research Project Approval Newport Lights Portfolio Study
- 01842310 Marketing Research Project Approval Experimental Newport Billboard Research
- 01842311 Marketing Research Project Approval Newport Backup Campaign 5543/877
- 01842313-2314 Marketing Research Project Approval Newport Billboard Phase I
- 01842316 Marketing Research Project Approval Blindfold Tast Test
- 01842333 O. G. Filter Promotion Test Marketing Research Project Approval O. G. Filter Promotion Test
- 01842334 Old Gold Lights Recall Test Marketing Research Project Approval
- 01842335 Old Gold Lights Newspaper Recall (with Kgl 100 Tag-on) Marketing Research Project Approval Old Gold Lights Newspaper Recall (with Kgl 100 Tag-on)
- 01842336 in-Home Product Test Marketing Research Project Approval 'revised Approval Form' in-Home Product Test
- 01842340-2341 'disaster Check' Taste Test Marketing Research Project Approval Old Gold Lights 'disaster Check' Taste Test
- 01842344 Old Gold Filter Recall Test Marketing Research Approval
- 01842345-2346 O.G.F. Vitality Test - Wave I Marketing Research Project Approval
- 01842373 Marketing Research Project Approval 30 Pack Product / Concept Study
- 01842376 Spring Lights
- 01842377 Marketing Research Project Approval 30 Pack Name Sort
- 01842379 Marketing Research Project Approval 30 Pack Creative Focus Group
- 01842380 Marketing Research Project Approval 30 Pack Name Check
- 01842381 Marketing Research Project Approval 30 Pack Creative Focus Group - Phase II
- 01842383 Spring Lights Blind Product Test
- 01842384 Marketing Research Project Request Low T&N Menthol
- 01842385 Marketing Research Project Approval Real Persuasion Test
- 01842387-2388 Marketing Research Project Approval Enriched Flavor I Product Test
- 01842422 Marketing Research Project Approval Smoking Behavior Habits
- 01842427 Marketing Research Project Approval Old Gold Lights Newspaper Recall (with Kgl 100 Tag-on)
- 01842451 Marketing Research Project Approval Kgl 100's Product Test
- 01842454 Marketing Research Project Approval Taste Test Vs. Parliament Ultra Lights
- 01842455 Marketing Research Project Approval Kgl Nat'l Aau Wave III
Related Documents:
Document Images
UaLc _June 1, 1977
hV1ltKI:TING Ia;S1'.AItC13 PROJI:CT APPItOVAI.
(To be filled out; by bfar{:t~tinf; Research Department)
sEVISED (REVISION t1F 5/10/77) REVISED
PROJ1.cz'Taste Test P1 us T R N
J~B ~ 5552/277-__
KG
100'
TITI
h
llJCT
s
L
Perc~tion Ta4-On
Research Design (N, Cclls, E1eKibility, Design, Key Banner Breaks, Methodology, Cities)
In an effort to evaluate the taste perception of our new KGL 100's, we are scheduling taste
~;`'tests in Denver, Colorado starting the w/o 5/1F/77.* More specifically, we will be speaking
to smokers 21 years of age, who smoke at least ; pack of their brand per day. In the actual
taste test, all participants will be 100mm. regular brand smokers (2/3 will smoke a non-menthol
100 product and the remaining 1/3 will smoke a 100mm. menthol brand).
In total, 300 respondents will take part in the taste testing. Those who regularly smoke a
non-menthol 100 will be given KGL 100's and either Lucky 100's or L A M Lights 100's. In the
"menthol cell", KGL Menthol 100's will be tested against Iceberg 100's. All of the 300
participants will be blindfolded during the taste test and will not be aware of the cigarettes
they are smoking. Furthermore, in'an effort to avoid any position bias, the KGL product will
be offered as the lst cigarette tested or as the second, on a rotation basis. Quotas have
..been setup to allow for approximately equal male/female representation in both the menthol
and non-menthol taste tests.
In addition to the taste test portion of the program, these same 300 respondents (plus an
additional 300 85mm. smokers) will he asked a few questions addressed at determininq the tar
evel at which Kent Golden Lights (85mm. and 100mm. products) is currently perceived in the -
market place. Secondarily, an attempt will be made to gauge to what degree some simplistic
(^^n+1rl ^n nev+ nmnnl
- Kcy Criteria For Analysis ~
The primary purpose of the consumer taste test research is to learn whether or not KGL 100'!
`roreferred for taste to a significant deoree vs. selected competitive brands. (In essence,
consumer research is being utilized to reinforce the validity of expert panel testing---
'-'stesting which is being undertaken to support KGL's positioning strategy of "as low as you can go
Rescarch Limitations
(L '
A sample of this magnitude and design should not be viewed as representative of nationwide
erceptions of the cigarette brands being evaluated.
Cost Estimate s13,nnn Research Firm Burke Marketing Research Co.
+ - ld;'o Contingency ycs (R~ no EZj 9% - adul t popul ati on for
Final Report Inc. yes r-( no Ej _,,\ I Incidence __100mm. smokers
.Atanag r/,QssisLant Product 31anagcr
b - 7 minutes
* As they become available
from_the fi-ld
weeks from approved quest.)
Final w/o July 4, 1977
(,, wccl.s from approved qucst:)'
Product mnnnt*cr
*There are many portions of this study, varied in nature and by market, which are ongoi
n
,
:
)ver the next few weeks. As top-line scores be(nme available, they will be presented- tq
IRD will furnish Brand with a final report docuri,_nt - which will include all of the ta
)ercepti on questi ons (85mm -and 1 nomm smnk,ers ) dirri ng the week of 7/4/77, or sooner

ntinued from TASTE TEST PLUS T R N PERCEPTION TAG-ON)
r
MRD #5552/277 fr
communications (i.e. "low tar," "at only 8 or 10mgs. tar" etc.) affect consumer correct
identification of KGL's tar level.
Furthermore, at the request of Brand, MRD has included a Real Vs. KGL taste test
segment to this study. In this portion of the program, 200 85mm. smokers (100 in N.Y.
and 100 in Denver) will evaluate in a blind testing environment, our 85mm. product and a
new competitive cigarette entry - Real.
Key Criteria for Pnalysis
and still get good taste and smoking satisfaction.") The major objective of the "tar and
nicotine" tag-on is to learn if KGL is correctly perceived (vis-a-vis its ranking against
competitive low tar brands) in terms of its tar level.
* We are including the Roosevelt Shoppinq Mall
as a 2nd test location for this study. Approx-
imately ; of the interviewing will he conducted
on Long Island --- and the other half in Denver,
Colorado.
