Jump to:

Lorillard

Marketing Research Project Approval Enriched Flavor I Product Test

Date: 11 Aug 1977
Length: 2 pages
01842387-01842388
Jump To Images
spider_lor 01842387_2388

Fields

Alias
MRD55461677
Type
MREP, MARKET RESEARCH PROPOSAL
BUDG, BUDGET/BUDGET REVIEW
Area
MARKETING/BASEMENT GMP
Site
G42
Named Organization
Newman Stein
Request
R1-354
Date Loaded
14 Mar 2002
Master ID
01842227/2480

Related Documents:
Litigation
Feda/Produced
Characteristic
ILLE, ILLEGIBLE
Brand
Golden Lights
Kent
True
UCSF Legacy ID
xdq54c00

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: xdq54c00
ENRICHED FLAVOR PRODUCT TEST C" 0 Menthol White Tip Totally T & N Blind Disclosure KGL KGL vs. vs. Test Test Prod. Prod. Non Menthol Menthol White Tip White Tip Totally T & N Totally Blind Disclosure Blind Paired comparison test - WATS screening for SHF smokers households - Mail product - WATS call back acements 240 240 ( ~~tions proximate reening 20% oker list ficiency d 75% of F smokers ing non nthol okers/ 200 200 1335 1335 via lisrof SHF smoking True True KGL KGL vs. vs. vs. vS. . Test Test Test Test Prod. Prod. Prod. Prod. 240 240 240 240 200 200 200 1335 1335 AGE 21 - 55 ~4 z Men Women ill be obtained from non menthol screening. C 0 Non Menthol Test Product Cork Tip KGL White Tip Tota ly Blind 200 * 1335 01842388
Page 2: xdq54c00
Date 8/11/77 FLIRKETINC RESEARCR PROJECT APPROVAL (To be filled out by 6farkcting Research Department) I'ROJECT h:nriched Flavor I ~ ODUCT Enriched Flavor I TITLE Product Test JOB IJ 5546/1677 tescarch Design (N, Cclls, F.legibllity, Design, Key Banner Breaks, Methodology, Cities) A paired comparison in honie product test will be conducted among smokers of 10 or more cigarettes per day between the ages of 21 and 55. This test will contain 6 test cells as follows: (1) KGL vs test prod. (non menthol, white tip - total].y blind) (2) KGL vs test prod. (non menthol, white tip - blind w/T & N Ns) (3) True vs test prod. (non menthol, white tip - totally blind) (4) True vs test prod. (non menthol, white tip - blind w/T & N #s) (5) KGL vs test prod. (menthol, white tip - totally blind) (6) KGL vs test prod. (non menthol, cork tip - totally blind) Each cell will be comprised of 200 low tar smokers (total N = 1200) -~ male and hfemale. Screening will be taken from Lorillard name bank via WATS lines from New York. Also by WATS line there will be a reminder call and call back interview. All products will be 85mm soft pack. .cy Criteria For Analysis rall product preference rall taste preference Action Standard - Parity with KGL :escarch Limitations •. ost Estimate $53,500 Research Firm - 1Q^, Contingency yes a] 1na1 Report Inc. yes UQ no `/ no ~ Incidence .~ ~ repared by: _ W. Do le .t4, Length Int. pproved by: ~- (I tl Open r•.nds / # Banners ~nrkcting Rcscarch Director Topline 'roduct hlanaCcr •r Final ( ~"~ ~~ oup ProducL Manal;cr ~ ~ . Newman-Stein N/A Lorillard Name Bank 15 minutes 6 2 6 ois423s7

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: