Lorillard
Toxicity of Reference Cigarette Smoke After Inhalation in Mice Following A 14 Day Smoke Adaptation Period
Fields
- Author
- Henry, C.J.
- Area
- SPEARS/OFFICE
- Alias
- 01320355/01320402
- Type
- SCRT, SCIENTIFIC REPORT
- BIBL, BIBLIOGRAPHY
- CHAR, CHART/GRAPH
- BIBL, BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Site
- G65
- Named Person
- Applebaum, J.
- Bales, R.
- Cassarett
- Dansie, D.R.
- Doull
- Haworth, S.R.
- Henry, C.J.
- Minnemeyer, H.J.
- Stone, C.J.
- Bales, R.
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- Document File
- 01320346/01320402/1601007 D3 and D4 Protocol and Final Report
- Request
- R1-004
- R1-039
- R1-040
- R1-058
- R1-132
- R1-039
- Named Organization
- Cumberland View Farms
- Process & Instruments
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Author (Organization)
- Micro, Microbiological Associates
- Quality Assurance Assn
- Master ID
- 01320346/0402
Related Documents: - UCSF Legacy ID
- jju81e00
Document Images
I-1725 .007
y
L
7:1-.~ ~ .. . .. ~ ~ .~ .. ~~ .,. . . . .. . . . . . . . . .~ ..~ .._..~ :.~
X
L.
0
?
i
0
e
Toxicity of Reference Cigarette Smoke
After Inhalation in Mice Following a
14 Day Smoke-Adaptation Period
.-Fina1 Report
For
Lorillard Company
420 English Street
Greensboro, North Carolina 27420
By
Microbiological Associates
"' 5221 River Road
Bethesda, Maryland 20816
r

,
.;;
,
I-172 5 . 007.
q
g
Table of Contents
Pa ge
,.
i«&i~;
. Data Page 3
. '`,'Introduction 4
,:Purpose 5
F'
t
. r_Reference Cigarette Characterization
~~
V. x..-Test Description
., VI. ',Materials and Methods a
: . :.. . : ~ ~ .
~iS~-c~~f~
VII. ";Results and Discussion 11
~
13
IX . References 14
~. .
X. Quality Assurance Statement 15
VIII. ```_ Conclusions

ai
N
1
i
zr
10.
:
~;.
~
-172 5 . 00 7
,
I. DATA PAGE
Cigarette Identity: Reference
yD,ates"Samples Received: March 26, 1982
Date Sample Returned: Retained in storage
Initiation Date: May 5, 1982
Completion Cate: See Review Completed Date, page
,
MA Experiment Number: I-172 5.007
15
:114A Notebook Number : 172 5.007
~
y~Ni.
~,"".Archives Location: . 5221 River Road, Bethesda, Maryland 20816
r~~
Sponsor: , Lorillard Company
420 English Street
_.
P.O. Box 21688
Greensboro, North Carolina 27420
r
Authorized Representative: Harry Minnemeyer, Ph.D.
Connie Stone, Ph.D.
Testing Facility: Microbiological Associates
~~N > 5221 River Road :
`' Bethesda, Maryland 20816
Lead Technician: David R. Dansie
~.y~.L2ti
Study Director: Carol J. Henry, Ph
x.
r
~-~O~1~ X-..
-J6'vv-ii:

°'Rodents are sensitive to certain components in smoke and
by previous exposures to smoke. The dose of srioke tolerated
resistant to others and this sensitivity seems to be altered
j3by naive rodents can, therefore, vary from the dose of smoke
be exposed to known toxic (60-100% mortality) doses of smoke. -
The results from naive and adapted animals can then be directly
mortality) doses of smoke for over 14 days, the animals can then
conditions. By exposing animals to known non-toxic (zero
:responses may also vary with the cigarette type and exposure
,'tolerated by "adapted" or previously exposed animals. These
compared.

;The purpose of this study was to determine whether exposure
These data will be used to establish doses and regimen for sub-
to single acute exposures using doses from Protocol 1601.001.
of known toxic doses of smoke.;:"Adapted" animals were challenged
to non-toxic doses of smoke over 14 days reduced the mortality of
vsequent studies.

. CIGARETTE CHARACTERIZATION
"Approximately 2000 reference cigarettes were received by
a reqistrv number of 2. Preliminary characterization of the
Microbiological Associates on March 26, 1982, and were assigned
confirmed by the sponsor. The sponsor specified storage at room
particulate matter (TPM) per cigarette. These data were verb ally
rette filter, yielding an average of 22.1 + 1.6 mg wet total
~'required to smoke the cigarette to within "'0.5 cm of the ciga-
mm water. When 4 cigarettes were sequentially burned on the
Walton Horizontal Smoking Machine, 8 puffs/cigarette were
reference cigarette indicated a resistance-to-draw (RTD) of '"100
temperature and no expiration date was provided.
h
h
i
l
of t
i
For t
e purposes
s study, t
e test art
e was stored
c
h
~° in the original cellophane sealed boxes in a secured area at room
L
temperature. ~ ~

~'"` In'order to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) that
will be used in long term studies, it is necessary to perform
rpreliminary experiments to assess the lethality of the reference
,cigarette smoke through acute toxicity studies. This was ex-
pected to yield a dose of smoke which would be toxic to the ani-
mals during a one day exposure. It was then necessary to es-
tablish whether the toxicity and resulting mortality observed in
Knaive animals after a single acute exposure could be altered if
animals had been "adapted" to smoke. This was accomplished by
exposing the animals over 14 days (5 days/week) to a dose deter-
mined in Protocol 1601.001 and 1601.001-M1 to be approximately
one-half the MTD over 1 day (MTD-1 day). The animals were then
°challenged with single acute doses known to be toxic. Five doses
I of smoke were used for the challenge, varying in smoke concen-
tration, number of repeated exposures, and number and length of
rest periods between exposures. Mice were observed for mortality
and toxicity responses, weight changes, level of carboxy-
hemoglobin (COHb), and general physical conditions during the 14
day adaptation period and during and after the challenge ex-
vposure. Smoke-exposed groups were all compared to a sham-exposed
'tcontrol group, which was treated identically to the smoke-exposed
;groups but no cigarettes were used in the smoking machine.

BC3F1/Cum mice,'females
8-12 weeks old
Sendai vaccinated
Cumberland View Farms,
Clinton, Tennessee
Smoke Generation Equipment:
Walton Horizontal Smoking Machine (Walton)
Stock-like neck holders
Process and Instruments Corp.
Brooklyn, New York
Materials: Heparinized blood collecting tubes (250 ul)
IL-CO-Oximeter
Metophane anesthetic
Methods
Animals were obtained from a source monitored and known to
be free of adventitious agents, vaccinated against Sendai virus
healthy animals. Mice were observed for signs of illness, un-
usual food and water consumption and other signs of poor health.
The animals were judged to be healthy prior to utilization in
this study.
and quarantined for 21 days. Stringent disease control pro-
cedures were followed during quarantine to assure the use of
.libitum, except during exposures on the smoking machines.
environmental contaminants. Water and food were provided ad
certified laboratory rodent chow which had been analyzed for
cage in polycarbonate autoclavable cages with filter top cage
.lids. Corn-cob bedding was used and animals had free access to
humidity, and a 12 hour light7dark cycle. Mice were housed 6 per
Animals were housed in an AAALAC-accredited facility with a
controlled environment of 74 + 5 oF, 50 + 2 0% relative
Animals were ear tagged and randomly assigned to 6 groups
of 6 animals each using the stratified sequence randomizaton
technique. Smoke exposures were performed over 14 days (5 days/
week) for Groups 1-5 using the following dose regimen: 10% smoke
concentration, 30 seconds smoke alternating with 30 seconds air
over 8 minutes, 8 puffs/exposure, 8 minutes exposure alternating
with 16 minute rest, 6 exposures per day. This dose had been
determined in Protocol 1601.001 and 1601.001-t41 to be approxi-
mately one-half the MTD-1 day. Sham-exposed (no cigarette) con-
trols were exposed simultaneously on another smoking machine. On
the 15th day, the mice were challenged using 5 doses of reference

cigarette smoke (see Dose Regimen Chart, page 10) for approxi-
Animals were observed for any unusual general physical condition
exposure on Days 7, 14 and 15, and 2 4 hours post final exposure.
weighed 24 hours prior to the first exposure, immediately after
. the level of carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) determined: Animals were
'and 3 sham-exposed mice were bled from the retroorbital sinus and
:on Days 7 and 15, 3 surviving smoke-exposed mice-fran each group
during adaptation and challenge. Immediately after the exposure
at which each exposure was initiated and completed, the number of
exposures, and the total number of puffs were recorded both
mately 140 minutes or until all mice/group died. The time of day
'~'during and after the exposures.
Exposure controls consisted of age matched, weight matched
animals, the machines set and run, but without cigarettes.
mice loaded onto smoking machines, treated exactly as the test
posure. A description of animals which died is given in terms of
estimating the causes of death. COHb levels are presented for 3
survivors from each group immediately after exposure on Days 7
and 15.
.'immediately after exposure on Day 15 and 24 hours post final ex-
survivors is given in terms of their physical appearance, both
P
;,using a t-test (Armitage 1971). A group description of the
ences between naive (I-1725.001) and adapted groups were com ared
by each animal in each group during adaptation and challenge are
presented and.discussed. The mean and standard deviation for the
number of puffs received by each group is computed and differ-
The The number of exposures and total number of puffs received
survivors 2 4 hours post final exposure. .The weight at death is
given for animals which died during an exposure.
posure, immediately after exposure on Days 7, 14 and 15 and for
Controls
The individual animal weights, the group means and standard
deviations are presented for 24 hours prior to the first ex-
Criteria for Determination of a Valid Test
None of the sham-exposed animals should die or show signs
of toxicity. COHb levels in sham-exposed animals should be less
than 4%. The COHb levels in the smoke-exposed groups should be
statistically (p <0.05) increased relative to the sham-exposed
controls. -

Dose Regimen for Acute Toxicity
for Reference Cigarettes
Length of Total Total
time exposed No. of No. of
Group Treatment to smoke exposures puffsa
1 '3 0$ smoke
( "' 12 ug TPM/ml ) ,
30/30, 8 puffs/
exposure, inter-
mittent, 8 min
rest between
exposures
2 `20$ smoke
('"8 ug TPM/ml),
30/30, 8 puffs/
exposure, inter-
mittent, 8 min
rest between
exposures
3 "10 $ smoke
("4 ug TPM/ml ) ,
30/30, 8 puffs/
exposure, inter-
mittent, 8 min
rest between
exposures
4 '20$ smoke
(-8 ug TFM/ml),
30/30, 8 puffs
exposure, 8 min
rest after every
two 8 min consecu-
tive exposures
5 -10$ smoke
('"4 ug TFM/ml ) ,
30/30, 8 puffs/
exposure, 8 min
rest after every
two 8 min consecu-
tive exposures
6 Sham exposed,
136 min,
I:o cic?ar?tte
'"36 min 9 "72
'36 min 9 `72
"3 6 min 9 72
"48 m.in 12 "96
'"48 min 12 '"96
NA NA NA
Puffs are defined to be the number of times air is forced
tr.rough the cigarette or cigarettes (2 or 3) pd aced in each
cigarette holder. One "35 ml puff of smoke wil1 be generated
from 1, 2 or 3 cigarettes resulting in '"10$, 20%, or 30% (v/v)
smoke concentration.
i
10 '

I-172 5 . 007
VII. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
BC3F1/Cum mice were quarantined for 21 days prior to
utilization, during which time their health status was evaluated
by observation. The animals were judged to be healthy prior to
initiation of this acute toxicity study.
The animals were exposed "nose-only" over 14 days (5 days/-
week) to whole cigarette smoke generated from the reference ciga-
rette on a Walton Smoking Machine at approximately one-half the
maximum tolerated dose for one day (r4TD-1 day). Groups of animals
were then exposed for one day to five doses of smoke, varying in
smoke concentration, number of exposures and puffs, length of
time between exposures, and were compared to a sham-exposed (no
cigarette) control group.
Tables 1A-6A document the initial and final exposure time
each day for rats on test in all six treatment groups. Exposures
started on May 19, 1982, and continued daily, 5 days/week,
(except for holidays and weekends) until June 3, 1982. Animals
were not treated on May 31, 1982. For this study, the 14 day
adaptation period is as follows: Day 14 is designated--as the
last day of adaptation, Day 15 as the challenge exposure day,
and Day 16 as the final observation day.
The number of exposures and number of puffs of reference
cigarette smoke received by each animal in each group are pre-
sented in Tables 1B-5B. No animals died in the sham-exposed
group or exhibited any overt signs of toxicity. Mice exposed in
the challenge treatment to 30% smoke, 9 exposures, or 20% smoke,
12 exposures did not survive the entire exposure (Groups 1 and
4, Tables 1B and 4B). Mice exposed to 10% smoke concentration
for 9 or 12 exposures survived the entire challenge treatment
(Groups 3 and 5, Tables 3B and 5B), as well as mice exposed to
20% smoke concentration for 9 exposures (Group 2, Table 2B).
These data suggest that the MTD-1 day for adapted animals is the
9 exposures of 20% smoke used in Group 2.
The individual body weights of the animals are given in
Tables 1C-6C. Sham-exposed mice showed little change in body
weight during the adaptation and challenge period (1% or less,
Day 0 to Day 15, Table 6C), followed by an approximate 8%
increase during the 24 hours after the final sham treatment.
Mice in the smoke-exposed groups also showed little increase (3%
or less) in weight from 24 hours prior to exposure (Day 0)
compared to 24 hours prior to the challenge exposure (Day 14,
Tables 1C-5C). The weights either at death immediately after
challenge exposure on Day 15 (Groups 1 and 4) or 24 hours after
final exposure on Day 16 (Groups 2, 3 and 5) also showed 4% or
less increase in body weight in the respective groups compared to
body we ights at Day 0.
11

I-172 5. 007
The sham-exposed group had COHb levels of less than 4%
(Table 6D). The average COHb levels for the 5 smoke exposed
groups during the adaptation period ranged from 22.3-25.5% COHb
(Day 7, Groups 1-5, Tables 1D-5D). The COHb levels in 3
survivors immediately after challenge exposure on Day 15 were
56.3+14.4$ COHb for Group 2, 26.6+1.1$ COHb for Group 3 and
38.6+9.3$ COHb for Group 5(statistically different from
sham-exposed control, p <0.05, t-test, Tables 2D, 3D and 5D,
respectively). The COHb levels for Day 15 for Groups 2 and 5
were also statistically increased over their respective levels on
Day 7 (Table 7D, p <0.05, t-test).
A general description of the response of the animals to
smoke is given for each group in Tables 1E-6E. All smoke-exposed
animals demonstrated struggling and irregular breathing to some
extent during the adaptation exposures. Mice which survived the
challenge smoke exposures (Groups 2, 3 and 5, Tables 2E, 3E and
5E) were lethargic, uncoordinated, trembling, unable to walk and
were lying prone, cold to the touch and had swollen noses.
Twenty-four hours post challenge exposure, s urviving mice
appeared normal.
The number of puffs of reference smoke receivedby the
adapted mice to this Study were compared to the number of puffs
received by naive mice in a previous study (I-1725.001). The
means for each group are presented in Table 8. The adapted mice
accepted significantly more puffs than the naive mice in 3 groups
(Groups 1, 2 and 5). Group 3 received the same amount in both
experiments. At the doses used in Group 2 and 5, 60-100% mor-
tality was observed in naive mice, while zero mortality was ob-
served in adapted mice. These results suggest that adaptation to
a low smoke dose over a 14 day period has the potential to in-
crease survival significantly.
12

I-172 5 . 007
VIII. CONCLUSIONS
The criteria for a valid test were satisfied in that no sham
exposed animals died or showed signs of toxicity and the COHb
levels for the survivors in smoke exposed groups were signifi-
cantly greater the sham-exposed group.
The results of this 14-Day Smoke Adaptation-Challenge Study
of Reference Cigrette show that mice are able to accept higher
levels of smoke after adaptation than without adaptation. This
increased tolerance resulted in 100% survival in two adapted
groups (Group 2 and 5), where 100% and 60% mortalty,
respectively, were previously observed (I-1725.001). While the
dose of smoke which the animals received was increased in adapted
Groups 1 and 4 (only Group 1 was statistically significant), the
adapted animals did not survive the entire dose regimen used in
these groups.
Moderate levels of COHb were observed in the survivors in
the smoke exposed groups (26-56% COHb). The mice which died did
have convulsions and were quite agitated, similar to naive mice
exposed to the same dose levels, suggesting that nicotine toxi-
city was not altered (Cassarett and Doull, 1975). Animals gained
little weight during the adaptation period. Survivors of the
challenge treatment also gained little weight. Mice appeared
normal within 2 4 hours post-challenge exposure, similar
to naive animals which survived in the previous study
(I-1725.001).
The results suggest that the maximum tolerated dose for
a single acute exposure will be higher for adapted mice. Thus at
least two dose regimens of the reference cigarette (Groups 3 and
5) should be used to provide information for characterization or
other test cigarettes. The dose regimen used in Group 3(10$
smoke, 9 exposures) yielded 100% survival after a single acute
exposure of naive or adapted mice while the dose regimens used in
Groups 2 and 5(20$ smoke, 9 exposures and 10% smoke, 12
exposures, respectively) yielded toxicity (as determined by
mortality) after a single acute exposure of naive mice but not of
adapted mice. The use of at least two of these dose regimens is
suggested for all subsequent studies comparing the toxicity of
test cigarettes with the reference cigarette.
13

I-172 5. 007
IX. REFERENCES
Armitage, P., Statistical Methods in Medical Research, New York:
John Wiley and Sons, pp. 99-104, 1971.
Cassarett, L.J. and Doull, J. Toxicology, New York: MacMillan
Publishing Company, Inc., pp. 237-437, 1975.
14

QUALITY ASSURANCE STATEMENT
Study Title: Toxicity of Reference Cigarette Smoke Af ter Inhalation in
' Mice Following a 14 day Smoke-Adaptation Period
Study Number: 1-1725.007
Study Director: Carol J. Henry, Ph.D.
Initiation Date: 05 May 1982
Review Completed Date: 06 July 1982
This study has been divided into a series of phases. Using
a random sampling approach, Quality Assurance monitors each
of these phases over a series of studies. Procedures, doc-
umentation, equipment, etc. are examined in order to assure
that the study is performed in accordance with the Good Lab-
oratory Practices regulations and to assure that the study
is conducted according to the protocol.
The following are the inspection dates, phases inspected,
and report dates of QA inspections of this study.
DATE OF REPORT SUBMITTED TO
INSPECTION PHASE INSPECTED STUDY DIRECTOR MANAGEMENT
18 May 1982 Protocol 18 May 1982 18 May 1982
02 July 1982 Final Report 02 July 1982 06 July 1982
This report describes the methods and procedures used in the
study and the reported results accurately reflect the raw
data of the study.
06 July 1982
Quality Assurance Date
RA/QA Department
15

Table 1A
DAILY RECORD OF INITIAL AND FINAL EXPOSURE TIMES FOR MICE
Group Number: 1
Adaptation Regimen: 10% smoke ("4 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke
30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure,
8 min exposure alternating with 16 min rest,
6 exposures/day, 48 puffs/day.
a
Date Initial Time
on Test Final Time
on Test Total
(Min/Day)
5/19/82 1:37 3:47 130
5/20/82 8:51 10:59 128
5/21/82 8:56 11:06 130
5/24/82 8:56 11:04 128
5/25/82 8:48 10:58 130
5/26/82 8:57 11:06 129
5/2 7/82 8: 58 11: 05 127
5/28/82 9:02 11:12 130
6/1/82 9:32 11:40 128
6/2 /82 8 55 11: 08 133
Challenge
Treatment Regimen: 30% smoke (-12 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke/
30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure,
8 min exposure alternating with 8 min rest,
9 exposures/day, 72 puffs/day.
6/3/82 9:27 9:54 27
a
Animals not exposed on May 31, 1982.

Table 2A
DAILY RECORD OF INITIAL AND FINAL EXPOSURE TIMES FOR MICE
Group Number: 2
Adaptation Regimen: 10% smoke ("'4 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke
30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure,
8 min exposure alternating with 16 min rest,
6 exposures/day, 48 puffs/day.
a
Date Initial Time
on Test Final Time
on Test Total
(Min/Day)
5/19/82 1:38 3:48 130
5/20/82 8:51 11:00 129
5/21/82 8:56 11:06 130
5/24/82 8:56 11:05 `129
5/2 5/82 8: 53 11: 02 129
5/26/82 8:57 11:07 130
5/27/82 8:58 11:06 128
5/28/82 9:02 11:10 128
6/1/82 9:32 11:40 128
6/2 /82 8: 55 11:18 143
Challenge
Treatment Regimen: 20% smoke ('"8 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke/
30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure,
8 min exposure alternating with 8 min rest,
9 exposures/day, 72/day.
6/3/82 9:15 11:32 137
a
Animals not exposed on May 31, 1982.

Table 3A
DAILY RECORD OF INITIAL AND FINAL EXPOSURE TIMES FOR MICE
Group Number: 3
Adaptation Regimen: 10% smoke ("'4 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke
30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure,
8 min exposure alternating with 16 min rest,
6 exposures/day, 48 puffs/day.
a
Date
Initial Time
on Test ~
Final Time
on Test
Total
(Min/Day)
5/19/82 1:42 3:51 129
5/2 0/82 8: 55 11: 04 129
5/21/82 8:56 11:06 130
5/24/82 8:57 11:06 129
5/25/82 8:57 11:07 130
5/2 6/82 8: 58 11: 07 129
5/27/82 8:59 11:06 127
5/28/82 9:03 11:11 128
6/1/82 9:33 11:41 128
6/2 /82 8: 55 11:10 135
Challenge
Treatment Regimen: 10$ smoke ("'4 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke/
30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure,
8 min exposure alternating with 8 min rest,
9 exposures/day, 72 puffs/day.
6/3/82 9:01 11:17 136
a
Animals not exposed on May 31, 1982.

Table 4A
DAILY RECORD OF INITIAL AND FINAL EXPOSURE TIMES
Adaptation Regimen: 10% smoke ("4 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke
30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure,
8 min exposure alternating with 16 min rest,
6 exposures/day, 48 puffs/day.
a
Date Initial Time
on Test Final Time
on Test Total
(Min/Day)
5/19/82 1: 45 3: 54 129
5/20/82 8:56 11:05 129
5/21/82 8:56 11:05 129
5/24/82 8:57 11:06 129
~
5/2 5/82 9: 03 11:12 129
5/26/82 8:59 11:07 128
5/2 7/82 9: 00 11: 08 128
5/28/82 9:03 11:11 128
6/1/82 9:33 11:41 128
6/2 /82 8: 56 11:10 134
Challenge
Treatment Regimen: 20% smoke ("'8 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke/
30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/expos ure
8 min rest after every two 8 min consecutive
exposures, 12 exposures/day, 96 puffs/day.
6/3/82 9:19 10:53 94
a
Animals not exposed on May 31, 1982.

Table 5A
DAILY RECORD OF INITIAL AND FINAL EXPOSURE TIMES FOR MICE
Group Number: 5
Adaptation Regimen: 10% smoke ("'4 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke
30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure,
8 min exposure alternating with 16 min rest,
6 exposures/day, 48 puffs/day.
a
Date Initial Time
on Test Final Time
on Test Total
(Min/Day)
5/19/82 1:48 3:57 129
5/2 0/82 8:56 11:12 136
5/21/82 8:55 11:04 129
5/2 4/82 8: 58 11: 07 129
5/26/82 9:07 11:15 128
5/26/82 8: 59 11: 08 129
5/2 7/82 9:00 11:08 128
5/28/82 9:03 11:12 129
6/1/82 9:33 11:41 128
6/2/82 8:56 11:1C 134
Challenge
Treatment Regimen: 10% smoke (-4 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke/
30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure,
8 min rest after every two 8 min consecutive
exposures, 12 exposures/day, 96 puffs/day.
6/3/82 9:07 11:25 138
Animals not exposed on May 31, 1982.

Table 6A
DAILY RECORD OF INITIAL AND FINAL EXPOSURE TIMES FOR MICE
Group Number: 6
Adaptation Regimen: Sham-exposed control,
no cigarettes
a Initial Time Final Time Total
Date on Test on Test (Min/Day)
5/19/82 1:55 4:10 135
5/20/82 9:00 11:16 136
5/21/82 8:48 11:05 137
5/24/82 8:45 11:01 136
5/25/82 8:43 10:58 135
5/26/82 8:45 11:01 136
5/27/82 8:44 11:00 136
5/28/82 8:46 11:11 145
6/1/82 9:20 11:36 136
6/2 /82 8: 46 11: 00 134
Challenge
Treatment Regimen: Sham-exposed control,
6/3/82 no cigarettes
8:44
11:06
142
a
Animals not exposed on May 31, 1982.

I-1725 . 007
Table 1B
TOTAL NUMBER OF EXPOSURES AND PUFFS RECEIVED BY MICE
Group Number: 1
Adaptation Regimen: 10% smoke ('"4 ug TPM/ml) 30 sec smoke/
30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure,
8 min exposure alternating with 16 min rest,
6 exposures/day, 48 puffs/day.
Animal Total Number
Number of Exposures Number of
Exposures/day Total Number of
Puffs/Received Number of
Puffs/Day
0217 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
0218 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
0219 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
0220 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
0221 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
~
0222 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
Number of
Survivors:
6
Challenge
Treatment Regimen: 30% smoke ('"12 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke/
30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure,
8 min exposure alternating with 8 min rest,
9 exposures/day, 72 puffs/day.
0217 1.0 - 8.0 -
0218 1.0 - 8.0 -
0219 1.0 - 8.0 -
0220 2.0 - 16.0 -
0221 2.0 - 16.0 -
0222 1.0 - 8.0 -
Group Mean: 1.3 - 10.7
S.D. 0.5 -
.
4 1 -
~
Number of
Survivors:
0 O
QD

I-172 5 . 007
Table 2B
TOTAL NUMBER OF EXPOSURES AND PUFFS RECEIVED BY MICE
Group Number: 2
Adaptation Regimen: 10% smoke ('"4 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke/
30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure,
8 min exposure alternating with 16 min
rest, 6 exposures/day, 48 puffs/day.
Animal Total Number
Number of Exposures Number of
Exposures/day Total Number of
Puffs/Received Number of
Puffs/Day
0223 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
0224 60.0 6. 0 480.0 48.0
0225 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
0226 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
0227 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
0228 60.0 6.0 480.0 ` 48.0
Number of
Survivors:
6
Challenge
Treatment Regimen: 20% smoke ('"8 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke/
30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure,
8 min exposure alternating with 8 min
rest, 9 exposures, 72 puffs/day.
0223 9.0 - 72.0 -
0224 9.0 - 72.0 -
0225 9.0 - 72.0 -
0226 9.0 - 72.0 -
0227 9.0 - 72.0 -
0228 9.0 - 72.0 -
Group Mean: 9.0 - 72.0 -
S.D. 0.0 - 0.0 -
Number of
Survivors:
6

I-172 5 . 007
Table 3B
TOTAL NUMBER OF EXPOSURES AND PUFFS RECEIVED BY MICE
Group Number: 3
Adaptation Regimen: 10% smoke ("'4 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke/
30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure,
8 min exposure alternating with 16 min
rest, 6 exposures/day, 48 puffs/day.
Animal Total Number
Number of Exposures Number of
Exposures/day Total Number of
Puffs/Received Number of
Puffs/Day
0229 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
0230 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
0231 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
0232 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
0233 60.0 6.0 480.0
w 48.0
0234 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
Number of
Survivors:
6
Challenge
Treatment Regimen: 10% smoke ("`4 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke/
30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure,
8 min exposure alternating with 8 min rest,
9 exposures/day, 72 puffs/day.
0229 9.0 - 72.0 -
0230 9.0 - 72.0 -
0231 9.0 - 72.0 -
0232 9.0 - 72.0 -
0233 9.0 - 72.0 -
0234 9.0 - 72.0 -
----- ----- ----- -----
Group Mean: 9.0 - 72.0 -
S.D. 0.0 - 0.0 -
Number of
Survivors:
6

I-1725.007
Table 4B
TOTAL NUMBER OF EXPOSURE AND PUFFS RECEIVED BY MICE
Group Number: 4
Adaptation Regimen: 10% smoke ('"4 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke/
30 sec air, 8 puffs/exposure, 8 min expo-
sure alternating with 16 min rest, 6 expo-
sures/day, 48 puffs/day.
Animal Total Number
Number of Exposures Number of
Exposures/day Total Number of Number of
Puffs/Received Puffs/Day
0235 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
0236 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
0237 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
0238 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
0239 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
0240 60.0 6.0 480.0 " 48.0
Number of
Survivors:
6
Challenge
Treatment Regimen: 20% smoke ("8 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke/
30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure
8 min rest after every two 8 min consecutive
exposures, 12 exposures/day, 96 puffs/day
0235 8.0 - 64.0 -
0236 1.5 - 12.0 -
0237 1.5 - 12.0 -
0238 1.1 - 9.0 -
0239 1.5 - 12.0 -
0240 1.4 - 11.0 -
Group Mean: 2.5 - 20.0
S. D. 2.7 - 21.6
Numbe r of
Survivors:
0

I-172 5 . 007
Table 5B
TOTAL NUMBER OF EXPOSURES AND PUFFS RECEIVED BY MICE
Group Number: 5
Adaptation Regimen: 10% smoke (8'" ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke/
30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure,
8 min exposure alternating with 16 min
rest, 6 exposures/day, 48 puffs/day.
Animal
Number Total Number
of Exposures Number of
Exposures/day Total Number of
Puffs/Received Number of
Puffs/Day
0241 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
0242 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
0243 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
0244 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
0245 60.0 6.0 480.0 48.0
0246 60.0 6.0 480.0 "" 48.0
Number of Survivors: 6
Challenge
Treatment Regimen: 10% smoke ("4 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke/
30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure,
8 min rest after every two 8 min consecutive
exposures, 12 exposures/day, 96 puffs/day.
0241 12.0 - 96.0 -
0242 12.0 - 96.0 -
0243 12.0 - 96.0 -
0244 12.0 - 96.0 -
0245 12.0 - 96.0 -
0246 12.0 - 96.0 -
----- ----- -----
Group Mean: 12.0 - 96.0
S.D. 0.0 - 0.0
Number of
Survivors: 6

Table 1C
BODY WEIGHTS OF MICE
Group Number: 1
Animal Body Weight (g)
a b b c d
Number Day 0 Day 7 Day 14 Day 15 Day 16
0217 17.0 15.3 16.8 16.8
0218 20.2 19.1 20.2 20.4
0219 18.6 18.1 18.9 18.9
0220 16.7 16.0 16.7 16.7
~
0221 17.9 17.3 18.2 18.0
0222 20.2 18.3 20.7 20.5
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Group
Mean:
18.4
17.4
18.6
18.6
S.D. 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.7
a
Twenty-four hours prior to first exposure
b
Immediately after daily exposure
c
Immediately after challenge exposure
d
Twenty-four hours post final exposure

Table 2C
BODY WEIGHTS OF MICE
Group: 2
Animal Body Weight (g)
a b b c d
Number Day 0 Day 7 Day 14 Day 15 Day 16
0223
0224
0225
0226
0227
0228
Group
Mean:
S.D. 19.3
19.2
18.9
19.4
18.6
20.7
----
19.4
0.7 18.4
18.3
17.1
18.0
17.7
20.1
----
18.3
1.0 19.7
19.7
19.0
20.0
19.0
21.1
----
19.8
0.8 19.1
19.5
18.3
19.3
18.7
20.2
----
19.2
0.7 19.3
20.2
18.9
19.2
18.5
21.1
----
19.5
1.0
a
Twenty-four hours prior to first exposure
b
Immediately after daily exposure
c
Immediately after challenge exposure
d
Twenty-four hours post final exposure

Table 3C
BODY WEIGHTS OF MICE
Group: 3
Animal
Body Weight (g)
a b b c d
Number Day 0 Day 7 Day 14 Day 15 Day 16
0229 19.4
0230 19.5
0231 21.0
0232 19.2
0233 16.4
0234 18.5
----
Group
Mean: 19.0
S.D. 1.5 18.3
18.7
20.7
17.5
16.2
17.3
----
18.1
1.5 19.9
19.2
21.7
19.4
18.0
18.4
----
19.4
1.3 19.1
19.0
21.2
19.0
17.0
18.0
----
18.9
1.4 19.4
19.4
21.6
18.8
"17.4
19.0
----
19.3
1.4
a
Twenty-four hours prior to first expos
b
Immediately after daily exposure
c
ure
Immediately after challenge exposure
d
Twenty-four hours post final exposure

Table 4C
BODY WEIGHTS OF MICE
Group: 4
Animal Body Weight (g)
a b b c d
Number Day 0 Day 7 Day 14 Day 15 Day 16
0235 20.3 19.6 20.3 20.7
0236 18.3 17.6 18.3 18.3
0237 19.9 19.6 20.7 20.7
0238 16.7 16.7 17.7 17.9
0239 19.9 19.0 20.8 20.8
0240 18.1 17.3 19.4 19.1
Group
Mean:
18.9
18.3
19.5
19.6
S.D. 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3
Twenty-four hours prior to first exposure
b
Immediately after daily exposure
c
Immediately after challenge exposure
d
Twenty-four hours post final exposure

Table 5C
BODY WEIGHTS OF MICE
Group: 5
Animal
Body Weight (g)
a b b c d
Number Day 0 Day 7 Day 14 Day 15 Day 16
0241
0242
0243
0244
0245
0246
Group
Mean:
S.D. 18.5
19.5
18.5
18.6
20.6
18.9
----
19.1
0.8 18.2
18.5
18.6
17.7
19.2
18.7
----
18.5
0.5 19.5
18.7
19.2
19.1
20.3
19.1
----
19.3
0.6 19.5
18.5
18.7
18.7 ~
20.1
19.3
----
_
19.1
0.6 19.4
18.8
19.1
18.2
20.2
19.8
19.3
0.7
a
Twenty-four hours prior to first expos
b
Immediately after daily exposure
c
Immediately after challenge exposure
d
Twenty-four hours post final exposure
ure

I-172 5 . 007
Table 6C
BODY WEIGHTS OF MICE
Group Number: 6
Animal Body Weight (g)
a b b c d
Number Day 0 Day 7 Day 14 Day 15 Day 16
0247 20.3 18.7 20.0 18.8 20.6
0248 19.0 17.2 19.0 18.4 20.2
0249 19.5 18.1 19.9 19.4 21.3
0250 18.2 18.0 18.7 18.6 20.0
0251 19.5 18.6 19.7 19
5 20.9
.
~
0252 15.8 15.2 15.8 15.7 17.3
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Group
Mean:
18.7
17.6
18.9
18.4
20.1
S.D. 1.6 1.3 1.6 1.4 1.4
Twenty-four hours prior to first exposure
b
Immediately after daily exposure
c
Immediately after challenge exposure
d
Twenty-four hours post final exposure

Table 1D
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN LEVELS IN MICE AFTER EXPOSURE TO
REFERENCE CIGARETTE SMOKE DURING ADAPTATION AND CHALLENGE
TREATMELdT
Group: 1
Adaptation Regimen: 10% smoke (-4 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke/
(Day 7) 30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure, 8
min exposure alternating with 16 min rest, 6
exposures/day, 48 p uffs/day.
Challenge
Treatment Regimen: 30% smoke ("'12 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke/30
(Day 15) sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure, 8 min
exposure alternating with 8 min rest, 9
exposures/day, 72 puff day.
Animal Percent Carboxyhemoglobin (COHb)
Number Day 7 Day 15
0217
23.3 a
0222
24.4 a
0218
28.8 a
Group Mean 25.5
S.D. 2.9
a
Animal died during challenge treatment.

Table 2D
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN LEVELS IN MICE AFTER EXPOSURE TO
REFERENCE CIGARETTE SMOKE DURING ADAPTATION AND CHALLENGE
TREATMENT
Group: 2
Adaptation Regimen: 10% smoke ("'4 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke/
30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure,
(Day 7) 8 min exposure alternating with 16 min rest,
6 exposure/day, 48 puffs/day.
Challenge
Treatment Regimen: 20% smoke ("'8 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke/
30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure,
(Day 15) 8 min rest after every 8 min exposure,
9 exposures/day, 72 puffs/day.
~
Animal Percent Carboxyhemoglobin (COHb)
Number Day 7 Day 15
0227, 0225 27.9 43.0
0224 23.8 54.4
0228 21.2 71.6
Group Mean: 24.3 56.3
S.D. 3.4 14.4

Table 3D
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN LEVELS IN MICE AFTER EXPOSURE TO
REFERENCE CIGARETTE SMOKE DURING ADAPTATION AND CHALLENGE
TREATMENT
Group: 3
Adaptation Regimen: 10% smoke ('"4 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke/
(Day 7) 30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure,
8 min exposure alternating with 16 min
rest, 6 exposures/day, 48 puffs/day.
Challenge
Treatment Regimen: 10% smoke ("'4 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke/
(Day 15) 30 sec smoke/30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/
exposure, 8 min rest after every 8 min
exposure, 9 exposures/day, 72 puffs/day.
Animal Percent Carboxyhemoglobin (COHb)
Number Day 7 Day 15
0229 27.7 26.9
0232,0230 24.8 25.3
0234, 0233 22.6 27.5
Group Mean: 25.0 26.6
S.D. 2.6 1.1

Table 4D
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN LEVELS IN MICE AFTER EXPOSURE TO
REFERENCE CIGARETTE SMOKE DURING ADAPTATION AND CHALLENGE
TREATMENT
Group: 4
Adaptation Regimen: 10% smoke (-4 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke/
30 sec air, 8 puffs/exposure, 8 min ex-
(Day 7) posure alternating with 16 min rest, 6
exposures/day, 48 puffs/day.ay.
Challenge
Treatment Regimen: 20% smoke ('"8 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke/
30 sec smoke/30 sec air over 8 min,
(Day 15) 8 puffs/exposure, 8 min rest every
two consecutive expos ures, 12 exposures/
day, 96 puffs/day.
Animal Percent Carboxyhemoglobz`n (COHb)
Number Day 7 Day 15
0239
23.2 a
0235
19.9 a
0240
23.8 a
Group Mean: 22.3 -
S.D. 2.1 -
a
Animal did not survive challenge treatment.

Y
I-172 5 . 007
Table 5D
CARBOXYHEMCGLOBIN LEVELS IN MICE AFTER EXPOSURE TO REFERENCE
CIGARETTE SMOKE DURING ADAPTATION AND CHALLENGE TREATMENT
Group Number: 5
Adaptation Regimen: 10% smoke ("4 ug TPM/ml) 30 sec smoke
(Day 7) 30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure,
8 min exposure alternating with 16 min
rest, 48 puffs/day.
Challenge
Treatment Regimen: 10% smoke ("4 ug TPM/ml), 30 sec smoke/
(Day 15) 30 sec air over 8 min, 8 puffs/exposure,
8 min rest after every two min consecutive
exposures, 12 exposures/day, 96 puffs/day.
~
Animal Percent Carboxyhemoglobin (COHb)
Number Day 7 Day 15
0242 21.5 35.3
0244 23.9 31.5
0245, 0246 21.8 49.1
Group Mean: 22.4 38.6
S.D. 1.3 9.3

Table 6D
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN LEVELS IN MICE AFTER EXPOSURE TO REFERENCE
CIGARETTE SMOKE DURING ADAPTATION AND CHALLENGE TREATMENT
Group Number: 6
Treatment Regimen: Sham exposed control, no cigarettes
Animal Percent Carboxyhemoglcbin (COHb)
Number Day 7 Day 15
0247 1.9 2.1
0248 1.5 1.3
0249 2.2 2.7
Group Mean: 1.9 2.0
S.D. 0.4 0.7

I-1725.007
Table 7D-Summary
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN (COHb) LEVELS IN MICE AFTER EXPOSURE TO
REFERENCE CIGARETTE SMOKE DURING ADAPATION AND CHALLENGE
Group Mean Percent COHb + S.D. a
Grou Challenge
p Treatment
Day 7
Day 15
1 30%, 30/30, 25.5+2.9
8 min/ expos ure
8 min rest,
9 exposures
2
20%, 30/30,
24.3±3.4
56.3+14.4 b,c
8 min/ expos ure,
8 min rest,
9 exposures
3
10%, 30/30,
25.0+2.6
26.6+1.1 c,d
8 min/exposure,
8 min rest, `
9 exposures
4 20%, 30/30, 22.3+2.1
8 min/exposure, -
2 exposures fol-
lowed by 8 min rest,
12 exposures
b
5
10%, 30/30,
22.4+1.3
38.6+9.3 ,c
8 min/ expos ure, - -
6 2 exposures,
followed by
8 min rest,
12 exposures
Sham exposed,
.9+0.4
.0+0.7
144 min, - -
no cigarettes
Standard deviation
bSignificantly different (p <0.05, t-test) from Day 7.
cSignificantly different (p <_0.05, t-test) from
sham-exposed control (Group 6).
dNot significantly different (p >0.05, t-test) from Day 7.

Table 1E
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
Group 1
Adaptation Period: Day 1-14
Mice demonstrated some struggling and irregular breathing
during exposure. Immediately after exposure, mice were generally
lethargic, uncoordinated, trembling and had swollen noses.
On occasion, the mice had runny noses and were lying prone after
exposure.
Challenge Period: Day 15
Mice demonstrated severe struggling, gasping, irregular and
labored breathing during exposure. Mice went into convulsions
before death. All mice died in this group. ~'

Table 2E
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
Group 2
Adaptation Period: Day 1-14
Mice demonstrated some struggling and irregular breathing
during exposure. Immediately after exposure, mice were generally
lethargic, uncoordinated, trembling and had swollen noses.
On occasion, the mice had runny noses and were lying prone after
exposure and cold to the touch.
Challenge Period: Day 15
Mice demonstrated struggling, gasping and irregular and
labored breathing. All mice survived in this group.,_Immediately
after exposure, the mice were severely lethargic, uncoordinated,
trembling, unable to walk and were lying prone, cold to the
touch, and had swollen noses.
Twenty-four hours post exposure, mice appeared normal and
fairly active.

Table 3E
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
Group 3
Adaptation Period: Day 1-14
Mice demonstrated some struggling and irregular breathing
during exposure. Immediately after exposure, mice were generally
lethargic, uncoordinated, trembling and had swollen noses.
On occasion, the mice had runny noses and were lying prone after
exposure and cold to the touch.
Challenge Period: Day 15
Mice demonstrated some mild struggling, and shallow
breathing during the challenge exposure. All mice survived in
this group. Immediately after exposure, the mice wer`e severely
lethargic, uncoordinated, trembling, cold to the touch and had
swollen noses.
Twenty-four hours post exposure, mice appeared normal and
act ive .

Table 4E
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
Group 4
Adaptation Period: Day 1-14
Mice demonstrated some struggling and irregular breathing
during exposure. Immediately after exposure, mice were generally
lethargic, uncoordinated, trembling and had swollen noses.
On occasion, the mice had runny noses and were lying prone after
exposure and cold to the touch.
Challenge Period: Day 15
Mice demonstrated struggling, gasping, irregular and shallow
breathing during exposure. Extreme struggling and c6hvulsions
were observed before death. All mice died in this group.

'I-172 5 . 007
Table 5E
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
Group 5
Adaptation Period: Day 1-14
Mice demonstrated some struggling and irregular breathing
during exposure. Immediately after exposure, mice were generally
lethargic, uncoordinated, trembling and had swollen noses.
On occasion, the mice had runny noses and were lying prone after
exposure and cold to the touch.
Challenge Period: Day 15
Mice demonstrated mild struggling and labored and shallow
breathing during expos ure. All mice survived in this_group.
Immediately after exposure, mice were severely lethargic,
trembling, uncoordinated, unable to walk and were lying prone,
cold to the touch, and had swollen noses.
Twenty-four hours post exposure, mice appeared no rmal.

~
~, I-172 5 . 007
Table 6E
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
Group 6
Adaptation Period: Day 1-14
Mice demonstrated no unusual behavior during the sham-
exposures. Immediately after exposure, mice had swollen noses.
Challenge Period: Day 15
No unusual observations were made during sham-exposure.
Twenty-four hours post exposure, mice were normal.

Table 8
COMPARISON OF ACUTE TOXICITY FOR NAIVE AND ADAPTED MICE
Mean Number of Puffs Received + S.D.
Group Treatment
1 30%, 30/30
8 min/expos ure,
8 min rest,
9 exposures
2 20%, 30/30
8 min/exposure;
8 min rest,
9 exposures
3 10%, 30/30
8 min/exposure,
8 min rest,
9 exposures
4 20%, 30/30
8 min/exposure,
2 exposures
followed by
8 min rest,
12 exposures
5 10%, 30/30
8 min/exposure,
2 exposures
followed by
8 min rest,
12 exposures
Standard deviation.
Naive
(1-1725.001) Adapted
(1-1725.007)
7.8 +0.4 10.7+4.1 b
8.0+0.0 72. O+O.Ob
-
72.0+0.0 72.0+O
Oc
.
-~
11.0+2.5 20.0+21.6d
79.8+17.7 96.0+O.Ob
bSignificantly different (p <05,_t-test) from naive
animals (I-1725.001).
cAnimals received scheduled total number of puffs in each
experiment. By definition, there is no difference between
naive and adapted animals.
dNot significantly different (p >0.05, t-test) from naive
animals (1-1725.001).
