Lorillard
Conference at the Office of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare - May 2, 1968 4-6 P.M.
Fields
- Area
- SCHULTZ/BASEMENT GMP (VPRD)
- Alias
- 01252931/01252944
- Type
- MINU, MINUTES
- Recipient (Organization)
- Hew, Dept of Health Education and Welfare
- Named Person
- Baker
- Clements, E.C.
- Cohen, W.J.
- Cullman, J.F. III
- Endicott, K.M.
- Finch
- Galloway, A.
- Grant
- Harrington, M.E.
- Kotin, P.
- Lee, P.R.
- Loosli
- Ramm, H.H.
- Stewart, W.H.
- Yeaman, A.
- Yellen
- Copied
- R, H.H. <Ramm, H.H.>
- S, P.A.
- Document File
- 01252708/01253007/General 65-71
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- Request
- R1-004
- R1-028
- R1-037
- R1-039
- R1-041
- R1-042
- R1-043
- R1-045
- R1-046
- R1-061
- R1-068
- Site
- G60
- Characteristic
- ATTE, ATTENDEE LIST
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Master ID
- 01252930/2944
Related Documents:
Document Images
.
r
CONFERENCE AT THE- OF FICE OF i. E SECRETARY OF HEALTft, EDUCATION
AND WELFARE - May 2, 1968 4-o P. M.
.
Present: Secretary Wilbur J. Cohen Earle C.'Clements
Dr. Philip R. Lee Joseph F. Cullman, 3rd
: Dr. William H. Stewart Edwin P. Finch
Dr. Kenneth M. Endicott Alexander Galloway
Mr. Tim Worth (Apparently.a Milton E. Harrington
Secretary)' Fred Haas
. ' H. Henry Ramm
~ Paul Smith
Addison Yeaman
Secretary Cohen opened the meeting by asking Senator
Clements to say a few words. The Senator stated that at the
previous meeting the industry's viewpoint had been presented
and that all industry.people present, as well as representa-
tives of companies not present, had been completely briefed
on what transpired at the meeting held April 1.
Messrs. Yellen and Grant of P. Lorillard Company were
expected to be present at today's meeting,-having accepted
1
.the invitation to come, but a matter arose that required
their presence in New York. One of the major companies had
declined the invitation to be present. -The Senator informed
the Secretary as to this,,not in derogation of that company's
position, in the hope that the Secretary would not regard 0
this as a serious matter.
Ul
N
W
W
1-+

2
;The Senator assured the Secretary that the results of
the meeting would be reported to the comftanz.es not present.
The Senator recalled.that at the previous meeting
.~ ~
the Secretary had recited his experience with a number of-
groups particularly ooncerned with pollution_and found as
a result of frank discussions with a large number of chief
executives of the companies involved progress was made.
The Senator said that the cigarette industry was in his
judgment prepared to proceed on all things that are worth-.
.while and to endeavor to achieve mutual confidence with
health authorities of the government. In absence of confi-,
dence the association would not accomplish much for either
From his previous discussions the Se~ator"harl inferred
.,
that the Secretary regarded research as very important.
Perhaps this meeting could proceed to aiscuss this area on
a policy level. However, the industry does not want to be
put in the same position as it was in connection with the Surgeon
General's.Advisory Committee report. In spite of statements
p
~
made to the contrary, the industry really had.nothing to do V
N
td
with the appointment of members of the Advisory Committee, ta
N

1
3
being given the opportunity only to strike names from a
list of.some three hundred submitted. The statements sub-
. sequently made about the industry's'participation in the
.selection of the Advisory Co:mzittee were not of the kind
t . ,.:
that-permitted develtipment of confidence by the industry
in its dealings-with government. Presumably it is not the
. purpose of this meeting to discuss details of research but
Secretary Cohen stated that his background for thirty-
four years seems to have been devoted to solving insolvable
problems. In view of his experience he is an optimist and
firmly believes that human beings have a capacity for solving
._the insolvable. Whenever there are strong differing points
,
of view it is helpful to have full discussian and rind some
areas of agreement and to break down the areas of disagree-
ment. .In dealing with leaders of industry in similar matters
which involved water and air pollution, the Secretary had
found that there were areas for cooperation.in working to-
gether with industry and government. The Secretary stated

i
4
that he received an awful lot of advice and was the most
advised man in Washington, having over two hundred advisory
co:n,-nittees: He conceives his responsibility as a generalist
whose function it is to examine all advice on the basis of
_ its overall affect on society and the general welf-are.,
He endeavors to approazh problems with humility and under-
.standing.
His responsibility, the Secretary stated, he regards
as falling within four separate and inter-related areas:
Research
HEW is a very vast research organization
which grows out of its commitment to safe-
guard public health. "'
Information to Congress.
HEW is required to make periodic reports
to Congress. It has a budget of some $14
billion and must report on its stewardship.
The Cigarette Labeling Act requires an annual
report about the cigarette indus~ry and;it
would be proper to discuss what might be in
that report.
Recommen-dations to Congress in changes in
legislation.
The Cigarette Labeling A_-t requires HEW to
report to Congress any recommendation it
has in changes in legislation. The staff has
been reviewing this matter and this also would
be an appropriate subject for further discussion.

I
5
Public education on health matters.
It is the responsibility of HEW to bring
to public knowledge information _as to
health matters. Responsibility is ''felt
especially with respect to children and
youth and this relates particularly as to
what should be said to young people about
smoking. It would be proper to discuss
this area of health education. ~_
,
The Secretary stated that'he was willing to start
today's discussion in the area of research and that the
other three.-areas ca-a be discussed at'subsequent meetings.
The Senator 'stated that if there is a comniunity of
interest in research, how cooperation can be achieved might
be a matter for discussion. The Senator referred to the
Lung Cancer Task Force and stated that this was a NI1i
oriented body, not connected with the industry, and that
there are areas of research other than luri~ cancei,- in which
:the industry is involved. The important thing, the Senator
.said, is to see if mutual confidence could be developed
whereby the structure of research can be understood by all
concerned. The Secretary stated that Dr. Endicott was pre--
Y

.
t
:.
Dr. Endicott referred to the Lung Cancer Task Force
and stated that the problem of lung cancer goes beyond the
tobacco industry. There are a number of things that have
-tv-be.exatnined that have nothing to do with tobacco.
As
an example he stated it is important to improve the cure
rate of lung cancer which is now only 5%. Clearly, there
t~ . . :. are factors other than cigarettes that produce lung cancer.
These include, a~nong others, chromate dusts, asbestos,
uranium mining and the coking industry. Another area for
1 research is concerned in exploring those factors relating
to the susceptibility of the individual hosts since out
of any large population sample only a portion of those ex-
posed to the same contaminants get lung cancer. The problem
of control is usually to identify w:lat there is in the en-
vironment:that causes a disease and them to remove them.
.In both atmospheric pollution and cigarette snloUng complex
mixtures are involved and the problem is to identify the
villains and to bring them down to safe levels. The ultimate
test is the effect on human beings, but since it may take
some thirty or more years for human beings to develop lung
cancer it is necessary to find some other biological test
system that can be used for experimentation. The first
. ~.

. . y
7
task is to determine which of the variety of available test
systems are trustworthy enough to work with. Even after
experimentation with test assay systems the final proof
-wi11 lie with tests on humans which may take 50 years or
more. The state of the art in terms of biologie al test
systems is much more advanced in lung cancer than it is
-_-: 9
in emphysema, bronchitis, and coronary heart disease. The
_.present program (apparently referring to Less Hazardous
Cigarette Work Group) is starting with lung cancer. However,
other Institutes than the Cancer Institute are involved--
the National Heart Institute being one--and they will par-
ticipate in the program. Agreement has been reached at
the National Institutes of Health that the less hazardous
cigarette program will be managed and directed by Dr. Paul
Kotin. Dr. Kotin is worrying most now as to how to find
funds for the program. Those participating in thb' program
from NIH know nothing about such things as growing tobacco
and how to make f ilters. Persons in NIH are howzver expert
in biological assay and their participation will be in this
regard in an effort to determine whether the industry is
proceeding in the right or wrong direction in modification
of its products. Dr. Endicott understood that the individual

.
8
;-:
cigarette companies wanted to remain independent of each
other and in position to produce their own individual kinds
of cigarettes.
Dr. Lee stated that competition had been the history
of the cigarette'industry and that he felt it was important
to inAintain this competition, particularly in the develop-
ment of improvements in cigarettes.
Mr. Ramm stated that one of the difficulties-apparently
is the difference in fundamental viewpoint between the
government and the industry. The government assumes that
it has been proved that.cigarettes cause lung cancer and
perhaps other diseases. The position of the industry is that
proof of causation is lacking and it is first necessary to
determine whether causation exists before determination can
be made as to methods to be adopted to' improveth5 product.
;
. Stewart stated that there is no question on the
basis of evidence that cigarettes are hazardous.
Mr. Yeaman stated that the industry regarded proof of
causation as a serious question and that nobody wanted more O
M
to explore this and find the answer than did the cigarette N
. cD
industry. Dr. Stewart respondedy by saying, you refer to ~W

9
:-,
the matter as a"question" where I say it .is a "problem".
He added that.there is no evidence that cigarettes do not
cause lung cancer.
Mr. Harrington stated that each of the com2anies had
done extensive research work and that the industry could
,
.coop,erate by furnishing--say to Dr. Kotiri--the results of
. ;~
this- research which would result in an econom'ic saving if
nothing else. Whatever information Liggett & Myers has
they will be glad to supply. Dr. Endicott stated that he
had had similar Offers from other con-panies and that he
could assure all concerned that any information w:zich might
be submitted on a confidential basis would be kept i.n confi-
dence. Secretary Cohen said that it is possible to work
out methods to assure confidentiality. Dr. Endicott said
that NIH had worked with the pharmaceutical people for ten
~ ?
15
years and much of the information submitte;I by that industry
had been of a confidential nature and- that there had been
no leaks. . ~
N
Mr. Finch statea'that companies in the industry had N
. ca
already discussed among themselves the matter of handling ~
any method of making a safer ci.garette---should it be found

most serious gap is the lack of an animal system in which
lung cancer can be reproduced as it is in man. _What is
nice in experimental work is the ability to produce in ex-
.perimental animals diseases identical to those in humans.
However, even though an animal system has not been found
r amentally following exposure similar to-that received by
I
that present cigarettes are not safe--and they all had agreed
informally to share such information with each other. Mr:
Galloway stated that if the companies-arid the government
cannot trust each other then we cannot work together.'
The Secretary then inquired as to whether there were
voids and gaps in knowledge that needed to be.filled. Dr.
Endicott responded that there are very large gaps in know-
ledge, the most serious being in the areas of emphysema and
cancer in other cites. With respect to lung cancer, the
man, the evi.dence in man Yiimselff is so strong that one has
to assume a cause and effect relationship between smoking
and lung cancer. The problems relating to,cardio-vascular
diseases and emphyse:.na are much more*difficult.
